What's Happening with Orangetree Estate?

Previously, I took a look at the condition of the real estate market in Irvine’s most expensive housing market, Shady Canyon. That was the highs; today it’s the lows. In other words, today I will write about one of Irvine’s most inexpensive housing markets, Orangetree.

Orangetree is in the 92618 ZIP code. This contains the Oak Creek, Stonegate, and Portola Springs neighborhoods as well as the planned Great Park neighborhoods. Therefore, the price of homes in this ZIP code varies greatly. Orangetree is the most affordable neighborhood in this ZIP as well as in much of Irvine. In spite of being one of Irvine’s most affordable communities, Irvine’s most recent housing element grades the condition of housing in this area with an A. The housing element concludes that this may be due to the existence of the homeowner’s association, which has fees range from approximately $200 to $350. Orangetree is located near Irvine Valley College, Irvine Spectrum, the Irvine Metro train station, and Oak Creek Golf Course as well as the Orange County Great Park.

According to Redin, 6 locations in Orange Tree currently have homes on the market. This is in addition to numerous sales that are pending. Orange Tree homes range in size from about 500 square feet to about 1200 square feet. The small number of square feet is a big contributor to the relatively small price. As the chart below shows, most Orange Tree homes are condos.

The median list price of Orange Tree homes is $216,000 or $252 per square foot. Redfin stats show that 5 homes sold in January 2012. The median selling price for these 5 homes was $205,000 or $249 per square foot. This median selling price per square foot is down 4.2% from the previous month and down 13.5% from the previous year.

An Orange Tree home listed near the median price per square is at 405 Tangelo. This 1983 condo has 2 beds and 1.75 baths with 1,051 square feet. It’s listed for $258,000 or $245 per square foot. The HOA fees are $298 and $19 per month.

The highest priced home in this market (excluding sales pending) is at 22 Tangerine. It’s a 2 bed and 1.75 bath single-family home with 1,202 square feet and an attached garage. The list price is $359,305 or $299 per square foot. The HOA fee is $186 per month. Redfin stats also show that this home was listed for $425,000 in September 2011. After this date, the list price went on a roller coaster ride with the price being lowered and raised various times until it was listed at the current price of $359,305. According to Zestimate, the value for this home has decreased by $12,000 during the last 30 days. The current Zestimate of this home is $346,100.

The Redin listing in Orangetree with the least expensive price tag (excluding sales pending) is 42 Orange Blossom. It’s a 1 bed and 1 bath condo with 717 square feet and a carport. The list price is $161,500 or $225 per square foot. The HOA fees are $280 and $20. This home sold for $201,000 on May 29, 2003, and according to Zestimate, the value of 42 Orange Tree has increase by $2,000 in the last 30 days. The current Zestimate is $168,900.

Now we’ve had a tour of the highs and low in Irvine real estate. Maybe next time I’ll write about the in-betweens. We’ll see.

Discuss below or at Talk Irvine.

API & Equity

The first formal education system was developed during 300 BC by Sumerians and Egyptians to serve as centers for teaching reading and writing. Later on, Confucius added music, literature and ethics to the learning list, and turned schools into enrichment centers. By the time we went to school, they served dual purpose of educating us, and setting the stage for our career choices. However, in the past decade education has evolved into a “race to the top” purely based on numbers. API ranking, API Growth Scores, Test Scores, SAT Scores, GPA – all these numbers have become vital in deciding a student’s future, and in controlling the real estate prices.

Whether we like it or not, for a large population that resides in Irvine, school district was the decisive factor. But even in the best school district, are some schools better than others? Does that affect the price for the particular neighborhood? Before we tell our children that our equity rests in their hands and ask them to bolster their test scores, let’s have a look at the Median Price/SF in the Irvine Villages and the percentage of price change in the last year (disregarding the age of the village, the ethnicity of the residents, the proximity to the freeway and other factors)

Village

School

Median Price/SF

Y-O-Y % change

Northwood

(Perfect 10)

Northwood Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 937

Santiago Hills Elementary

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 961

Brywood Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 926

Sierra Vista Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 948

$292/SF

-7.6%

Northwood Point

(Perfect 10)

Canyon View Elementary

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 966

Sierra Vista Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 948

Northwood High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 908

$328/SF

-7.1%

Lower Peter’s Canyon

(Biggest Y-o-Y percentage drop)

Hicks Canyon Elementary

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 942

Myford Elementary

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 951

Pioneer Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 939

Orchard Hills Middle School

API Rank: Not ranked yet

API Growth: 952

Arnold Beckman Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 866

$275/SF

-21.9%

Portola Springs

(Perfect 10)

Stonegate Elementary Schoo

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 954

Sierra Vista Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 948

Northwood High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 908

$293/ SF

1.4%

Woodbury

Woodbury Elementary School

API Rank: 9

API Growth: 918

Sierra Vista Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 948

Irvine High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 881

$292

-16.8%

Woodbridge

Springbrook Elementary

API Rank: 9

API Growth: 897

Meadow Park Elementary

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 947

Stonecreek Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 958

Eastshore Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 940

Lakeside Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 933

Southlake Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 916

Woodbridge High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 877

$273

-6.2%

Oak Creek

(Perfect 10)

Oak Creek Elementary

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 925

Lakeside Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 933

Woodbridge high School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 877

$261/SF

-20.4%

Quail Hill

(Perfect 10)

Alderwood Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 961

Rancho San Joaquin Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 954

University High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 908

$326/SF

-13.3%

Turtle Rock

(Perfect 10)

Turtle Rock Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 978

Bonita Canyon Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 965

Rancho San Joaquin Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 954

University High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 908

$295/SF

-14.2%

West Park

(Highest Price/SF)

Culverdale Elementary School

API Rank: 8

API Growth: 857

Southlake Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 916

University High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 908

$356

-11.2%

West Park II

(Perfect 10)

Stone Creek Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 958

Plaza Vista Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 958

Lakeside Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 933

Woodbridge High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 877

$305

-14.8%

University Park

University Park Elementary

API Rank: 9

API Growth: 909

Rancho San Joaquin Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 954

University High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 908

$281

-10.8%

Walnut Village

(Perfect 10)

(Lowest Price/SF)

Deerfield Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 937

College Park Elementary School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 927

Venado Middle School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 927

Irvine High School

API Rank: 10

API Growth: 881

$259

-12.8%

Observations:

Walnut village has the lowest price/ sf in the Irvine villages listed about, and has three schools with a perfect 10 API Score. The API Growth Score is good too, but still it ended up at the bottom of the list.

West Park has the highest price/sf in the list, but the elementary school has API rank of 8, and the API Growth Score is not above the desirable 900.

The year-over-year percentage drop was the biggest in Lowers Peters Canyon (West Irvine and North park, North park Square) area, and it has Tustin Unified School District schools with a perfect 10 API, and high API Growth Scores.

Portola Springs saw a percentage hike over last year’s median price/sf, and the schools have a perfect ten API rank and good API growth score. But many other villages are on par with those numbers.

Even though the boundaries of the City of Irvine command better prices in Orange County because of their schools, school boundaries within Irvine aren’t dictating the prices yet.

Would you choose one Irvine village over another based only on the schools? Do you think it is the schools that help Irvine hold the premium over other cities?

Discuss below or at Talk Irvine.

Closed Sales from 2/23/2012 to 2/29/2012

Date Sold Address Zip Tract Sold Price Beds Sq Ft
Airport Area
2/23/12 5144 Scholarship 92612 The Plaza $900,000 2 1930
2/24/12 2220 Watermarke 92612 Watermarke $195,000 1 635
2/27/12 2243 Martin #121 92612 Metropolitan $260,000 1 808
2/27/12 2282 Scholarship 92612 Avenue One $210,000 1 725
2/29/12 2243 Martin #311 92612 Metropolitan $215,000 1 941
2/29/12 1380 Scholarship 92612 Avenue One $330,000 2 1037
Columbus Grove
2/23/12 42 Honey Locust 92606 Kensington Court $450,000 3 2125
2/27/12 54 Fringe Tree 92606 Kensington Court $515,000 3 2125
El Camino Real
2/27/12 36 Goldenbush 92604 Deerfield Townhomes $340,000 3 1550
2/28/12 17 Snowberry 92604 Deerfield Townhomes $300,000 2 1150
Northpark
2/29/12 42 Idyllwild 92602 Monticello $345,000 2 1500
Northwood
2/23/12 224 Pineview 92620 The Lakes $260,000 2 1204
2/23/12 4 Hudson 92620 Oakleaf $695,000 4 2145
2/23/12 941 Somerville 92620 Greystone Villas $335,000 2 1260
2/24/12 2012 Timberwood 92620 Collage $390,000 2 1267
2/28/12 159 Pineview 92620 The Lakes $184,900 1 932
2/28/12 20 Grape Arbor 92620 Camellia $843,000 4 2460
Oak Creek
2/29/12 81 Eaglecreek 92618 Kenwood $978,000 5 3123
Orangetree
2/23/12 81 Tarocco 92618 Orchard Glen $267,000 2 995
2/24/12 2310 Apricot Dr 92618 Terrace $270,000 3 1350
Portola Springs
2/28/12 54 White Sage 92618 Bougainvillea $510,000 3 2050
Quail Hill
2/27/12 83 Reunion 92603 Ambridge $433,000 2 1656
2/29/12 46 Reunion 92603 Sage $465,000 2 1145
Rancho San Joaquin
2/28/12 11 Morena 92612 RSJ Villas $360,000 2 1145
Shady Canyon
2/23/12 23 Cactus 92603 Custom $6,500,000 8 12016
2/29/12 33 Prairie Grass 92603 Villas of Shady Canyon $2,800,000 4 4215
Turtle Ridge
2/24/12 34 Rose Trellis 92603 Ledges $1,400,000 3 3186
Turtle Rock
2/24/12 6 Brigadier 92603 Summit Regency $1,850,000 5 3336
2/27/12 8 Nidden 92603 Summit Regency $1,839,000 5 3259
Walnut
2/24/12 14592 Oak Ave 92606 College Park $611,000 4 1873
2/28/12 475 Deerfield Ave 92606 Windwood Townhomes $325,000 2 1239
West Irvine
2/24/12 18 Hidden Brook 92602 Amberwood $695,000 4 2478
Westpark
2/28/12 46 Festivo 92606 Cortina $914,000 4 2450
2/29/12 3742 Claremont 92614 Culverdale $542,000 5 2754
2/29/12 12 Cigliano Aisle 92606 Corte Bella $465,000 3 1614
Woodbridge
2/23/12 23 Lakeside 92604 Crossing $400,000 2 1477
2/23/12 2 Rosemary 92604 Villager $335,000 3 1123
2/23/12 3 Halfmoon 92614 Summerfield $670,000 4 1887
2/23/12 64 Greenfield 92614 Alders $285,000 2 1060
2/28/12 3 Perch 92604 Townhomes $377,000 2 1120
2/28/12 53 Pinewood 92604 Crossing $675,000 3 1910
2/29/12 20 Cedarglen 92604 Villager $255,000 3 1123
2/29/12 12 Hollowglen 92604 Glen $350,000 3 1220
Woodbury
2/28/12 32 Herringbone 92620 Cortile $350,000 2 1148
2/28/12 138 Vintage 92620 Lombard Court $320,000 2 1205

Discuss below or on Talk Irvine.

What is the Condition of Irvine's Housing Stock?

In a previous post, I wrote about the Irvine city council’s most recent encounter with the California Housing Element. Since the housing element will be fundamental in determining what is built or not built in Irvine, I thought I would review the document. Following is part of what I found.

Irvine’s housing element has many aspects, and one of these is a survey of the condition of Irvine’s housing stock. That is what I’ll look at today. The following information, which can be found in Irvine’s most recent housing element (2008-2014 Irvine Housing Element), is based on the 2008 Housing Conditions Survey. This survey focuses on seven areas in Irvine with high levels of older homes that were built before 1990. Therefore, not all Irvine neighborhoods are listed below. Note that much of the text found below is taken directly from the 2008-2014 Irvine Housing Element.

Here is a map of the areas that are the focus of the survey:

The grading system is as follows:

A – Good: No visible factors of deterioration evident

B – Fair: 1-2 actors of visible deterioration evident

C – Poor: 3-5 factors of visible deterioration evident

Area 1 – University Park, University Terrace, Parkside, Parkwood Apartments

  • Number of Homes Surveyed: 2,753

  • Type of Units:

    • University Park—single-family detached homes and condos

    • University Terrace and Parkside—single-family attached condos and townhomes

    • Parkwood Apartments—apartments

    • Condition of Homes:

  • Condition of Homes

    • University Park—Grade A

      • A few homes required minor roof repairs.

      • Six homes in the area received an A- due to missing/damaged roof shingles.

    • University Terrace and Parkside—Grade A (maintenance provided by HOA)

    • Parkwood Apartments—Grade A

Area 2 – Culverdale/Westpark

  • Number of Homes Surveyed: 3,112

  • Type of Units: predominately single-family detached homes

  • Condition of Homes: Grade A-

    • A small number of visible factors of deterioration evident existed.

    • Most of the houses needed numbers re-painted on the curbsides.

    • Some of the older houses had splintering support beams and sagging garage doors.

Area 3 – Orange Tree

  • Number of Homes Surveyed: 412

  • Type of Units: single-family (Although these homes are listed as single-family in the housing element, many of these homes would be considered as condos by some.)

  • Condition of Homes: Grade A

    • When compared to other neighborhoods in Irvine, Orange Tree consists of many older homes.

    • However, in spite of the large number of older homes, the quality of maintenance was high.

    • The high quality may be due to the existence of HOAs.

Area 4 – Deerfield Apartments, Deerfield Park, The Ranch, California Homes, The Willows

  • Number of Homes Surveyed: 2,573

  • Type of Units:

    • Deerfield Apartments—apartment

    • Deerfield Park–single family detached dwellings

    • The Ranch—older development

    • El Camino Glen development (formerly known as California Homes)— older development

    • The Willows—not listed in the housing element

  • Condition of Homes:

    • Deerfield—Grade A

      • The homes were in good condition considering this is an older multiple-family development.

      • No visual signs of deterioration existed.

      • The structures are sound.

    • Deerfield Park—Grade A

      • These homes were found to be in generally good condition.

      • A few homes required minor paint and roof repairs.

      • Nine homes in the area were identified as having cracked/peeling paint.

    • The Ranch—Grade B-

      • Many homes were undergoing roof repair or replacement.

      • Some homes had sub-par landscaping as well as poorly irrigated front lawns.

      • Most of the single-family homes were well kept.

    • El Camino Glen development (Formerly entitled California Homes) – Grade B-

      • One potential deferred maintenance condition is the need for garage repair or replacement.

      • Five homes on Yearling St. had warped, sagging, or missing garage doors.

      • A total of 16 homes within El Camino Glen were in need of garage replacement.

    • The Willows – Grade C+

      • Several homes were in need of roof repair, fresh paint, garage door replacement, window repair, and landscape up-keeping.

      • Many homes had chipped, weathered or damaged wooden fences across their front lawns.

      • Damaged front porch beams and unpaved driveways were other deferred maintenance conditions that were abundant across the neighborhood.

      • The Willows has no HOA.

Area 5 – Irvine Groves, College Park, Green Tree Park, The Colony, The Racquet Club

  • Number of Homes Surveyed: 2,461

  • Type of Units:

    • Irvine Groves—condominium style units (These are listed as condominium style units in the Irvine Housing Element; however, many of us would refer to these as mobile homes. Also, this is a 55+ community.)

    • College Park—detached homes

    • Green Tree Park—not identified in the housing element

    • The Colony—single-family homes

    • Racquet Club—not listed in the housing element but this is a detached single-family community

  • Condition of Homes:

    • Irvine Groves—Grade A

      • These homes were in good condition.

      • This was the best rated community in Area 5.

    • College Park—Grade B+

      • A moderate amount of homes needed minor repairs.

      • Many of the homes had dead lawns that might have been due to the season.

      • The pool area buildings showed some signs of deferred maintenance.

    • Green Tree Park— Grade B

      • Many houses had overgrown trees with poorly irrigated landscaping which resulted in signs of decay.

      • Due to damaged roofs, cracked driveways, warped garage doors, and fading paint, many houses were in need of upgrades.

      • Many houses were undergoing construction. In addition, the construction sites were substandard; large amounts of trash and debris were visible.

    • The Colony—Grade B

      • This was the most deteriorated community in the Area 5.

      • Cars were parked on the street for over 72 hours and seemed non-operational.

      • Most houses had curbside house numbers that were faded and hard to read.

      • Many houses had leaf build-up causing poor street run-off and drainage.

      • A large amounts of dead, unkempt trees existed on Hemingway and Utrillo.

    • Racquet Club—Grade B

      • Many homes had unsanitary garbage areas.

      • Many houses showed signs of decay, overgrown lawns, poor landscaping and leaf build-up.

      • The leaf build up in certain specific areas caused drainage issues.

      • Many houses in the area had cracked or asphalt driveways as well as weathered porch beams that were in need of upgrading or repair.

Area 6 – Woodbridge

  • Number of Homes Surveyed: 2,653

  • Type of Units: single-family detached and attached homes that are relatively new when compared to Irvine homes listed in the other six areas

  • Condition of Homes: Grade A with no evident signs of deterioration

Area 7 – Turtle Rock

  • Number of Homes Surveyed: 1,885

  • Type of Units: single-family detached homes

  • Condition of Homes: Grade A

    • These homes were in very good condition

    • No signs of deterioration or blight existed.

Here is what the Irvine Housing Element says about the condition of affordable housing in Irvine:

“Substandard conditions and the need for rehabilitation is not an issue with the City’s affordable housing inventory since units are well maintained by property owners. Moreover, like the rest of its housing stock, a majority of the City’s assisted units are fairly new and in good condition.”

And here is how the city is addressing housing that is in need of repair:

“To address deteriorating housing conditions, the City has operated a Residential Rehabilitation Program (RRP) since 2003. The purpose of RRP is to provide deferred loans and/or grants to very low, low and moderate income owners of single-family detached dwellings, townhomes, condominiums, and mobile homes for the preservation of decent safe and sanitary housing. The RRP corrects hazardous structural conditions, makes improvements considered necessary to eliminate blight, promotes the construction of healthy, sustainable and resource-efficient housing, improves disabled access, and corrects building, health and safety code violations. Financial assistance through the RRP previously only consisted of emergency grants up to $5,000 for emergency repairs such as leaking roofs, faulty plumbing or electrical wiring, or other necessary repairs. In 2010, the City established a loan program that provides three percent deferred loans of up to $25,000 to assist low-income Irvine homeowners with critical home improvement needs.”

Planning for the Irvine’s next housing element, which will be in effect for eight years, is currently in process. The planning commission and city council will be discussing the new version this year and next. So stay tuned to see how Irvine’s new housing element compares to the current housing element.

Discuss below or at Talk Irvine.

A Review of the Las Colinas Tract at Portola Springs

Las Colinas is one of the larger (and pricier) tracts in Portola Springs. They’re currently in their final phase and have about seven properties left. I reviewed the property on a beautiful Saturday morning. Clear blue skies put me in the buying mood for some reason, so my review may have a positive twist. I noticed that the neighborhood was quiet, which was almost an eerie feeling since I’m so used to loud neighbors. The demographics in this neighborhood were different than the other Portola Springs communities. I saw the age 40+ crowd walking their dogs or jogging. I observed this very quickly since I’m used to seeing kids everywhere in the other neighborhoods. Indeed, the Las Colinas housing feels like it’s not built for families. The aura and atmosphere felt like it catered to an older, more established homeowner. I could never imagine skateboarding ramps or Hop Scotch chalk drawings on the sidewalks. Maybe that’s why this neighborhood appealed to me.

The builder of this tract is Taylor Morrison. Their motto is “homes inspired by you.” I tend to agree with their tag line. Out of all the builders that I’ve seen, Taylor Morrison is my favorite. They have hits and misses, but overall I like them the best because they’re the most practical and share my love of big bathrooms. The neighborhood does have its down side. It’s constructed like a quarter slice of a piece of a pie—literally. Depending on where your lot is positioned, you could experience street noise from Portola Parkway. Granted, there is a berm of trees and shrubs shielding you from the ugly street view, but if you get one of those loud construction trucks barreling down the street, you’re going to hear it. The outermost houses border Ridge Valley, so no matter where you go you’ll hear some street noise. Welcome to California.

Would I live here? Yes—if the house was given to me. If I had to sink money into it, I’d choose to bypass this property. It’s too big for someone like me. Even if I was married I still couldn’t imagine living in the space, unless I did a large volume of entertaining and had house guests often. Pricing ranges in the high $900,000s but you’re probably looking at well over $1 million if not higher. I’m not sure I can justify the price. I’d want a bigger lot size for that chunk of change. I’m sure it’s comparable to other properties, but I’m a dreamer and still holding out for that “gem” of a property that gives me more bang for my buck.

Pricing

Community Overview

Site Map

Floorplans

Residence 1X (La Cumbre)

Number of bedrooms: 4 bedrooms

Number of bathrooms: 4 baths

Square footage: 2,988 sq. ft.

Garage: 2 cars

Base price: $996,885+

The entry to Residence 1 surprised me. You’re greeted by a series of architectural arcades that give the illusion of length. The rounded arches are Romanesque, which would typically attract my attention, but my initial instinct was that it made the entry seem cold. It’s grand and luxurious. Maybe Daddy Warbucks would like it, but my preference is cute and charming. Right away my guests will experience the comfort of my home without having to walk down a stretching hallway. To the right of the door is what they refer to as the “Loggia.” Basically it’s an extra seating area with a view of the backyard. It’s functional if you entertain a lot and want to offer guests seating. My personality profile says it’s impractical for my lifestyle—not matter how cool it is to say your house has a “Loggia.”

Once you walk through the arcade, you’ll spot the formal dining room. It’s a nice feature to have a separate space dedicated to dining. We spend a lot of time eating in front of the television, so having a separate space to enjoy your meals is attractive to someone like me. However, practicality dictates that somehow we’ll still find a way to eat near a television (it’s part of our lifestyle), so I’m not sure if I would use this space other than for “show.” I’m just being realistic.

The kitchen wasn’t as large as I expected. It was nonetheless beautiful with a huge island. The island is perfect for bar style seating, and is even big enough to serve dinner for 2-4 people. The one element that shocked me was the minimal overhead cabinetry. Remember my post from Laguna Altura? My complaint was that there was too much cabinet space, which created a “too much kitchen” feel. Residence 1 has a smaller amount of upper cabinet space, but compensates by providing adequate lower cabinet storage. I liked this concept. There is a large pantry. It’s shelving, not a walk in. I don’t eat that much food but it would be ideal for 2-4 people. Nestled near the window is a space that the builders call a “Morning Room.” I prefer to think of it as the informal dining room. You could seat a rectangular table for 6 people. They carved out a nice space and I could see myself sitting there on a Saturday morning, drinking my glass of OJ and enjoying the view of my backyard.

The living room isn’t as large as I thought it would be. I’d opt to have a fireplace installed to make it a little extra cozy. The living room is shaped like a square, so the furniture fits just right. I think it’s a sufficient space and will offer plenty of seating with room for a large coffee table.

The other features on the ground floor include the powder room (small and functional) and an under the stairs storage closet. The backyard isn’t what I expected size-wise. It was rather narrow and small. The model’s backyard was “L-shaped” and extended past the Loggia. They had a fountain that could be viewed from the Loggia, but I still felt like it was a tight squeeze. Somehow they were able to fit a kid’s swing set back there—kudos to them.

The master bedroom is located at the top of the stairs. If the house doesn’t have a lot of foot traffic, this might be acceptable. If I had kids with elephant feet stomping up and down the stairs while I’m napping, it would bother me.

I enjoyed the master bedroom. I felt like it had a pleasant aura to it. Maybe it’s because there were plenty of windows and the model had a view of the backyard. It was just the right size for me. The only down side that I saw to the master bedroom was the sliver of wall space, where your headboard would typically go. If you have a King, Queen, or Cal King bed you’ll be hard pressed to fit a headboard on the wall since it’s wedged in between two windows. If you turn on HGTV you’ll find a plethora of options to give you the illusion of a headboard. It’s not a deal breaker for me.

The master bathroom has a split sink vanity with an oval tub sandwiched between them. This is a reoccurring feature in Taylor Morrison’s designs. I wished the vanities had more countertop space. I was a little disappointed in that. The walk in shower is skinny, but gets the job done. It was very nice, and less to clean. The bathroom also included a large walk-in closet. I’d have lots of fun filling up the space with my wardrobe! Tip: I’d opt to get the mirror upgrade installed on the closet door since there aren’t any full length mirrors elsewhere.

The second bedroom is a decent size. The model has it set up as a nursery, but there’s definitely room for growth. The room includes its own bathroom and a spacious walk in closet. The bathroom has a tiny vanity and a very narrow tub. I was wondering if I was too tall to fit in it. It doesn’t seem conducive for an adult bath retreat. There is a tiny balcony accessible off the second bedroom. I call it the “Romeo Balcony” because you can literally take one step out the door and not be able to go any further. It’s perfect if you have a Romeo serenading you in the moonlight. Otherwise, I see no purpose for it!

The third bedroom is also an acceptable size. There are dual split closets, which I was pleasantly surprised with. The model also featured a third closet, just in case you have an overflow of clothes. The ensuite mirrors the bathroom in bedroom 2, so there isn’t any wow factor to the bathroom. On the plus side, the bedrooms have their own bathrooms. The negative is the cramped space, small vanities and narrow tubs.

Residence 1 has a nice layout, and my complaints are only grumblings. There wasn’t anything blaringly wrong with this place upon my first sweep through, but like any house it has to fit your lifestyle. Residence 1 does not fit my lifestyle or personality.

Residence 3 (El Morro)

Number of bedrooms: 4 bedrooms

Number of bathrooms: 4 baths

Square footage: 3,109 sq. ft.

Garage: 3 cars

Base price: $1,008,675+

When I walked through the outside wooden door to Residence 3 I almost gasped. It was like entering a garden paradise. It was beautiful. The backyard functioned as a front yard. Dual purpose! The actual front door to your house is accessed off the garden. I wanted to buy the house just for this feature. Every day I’d walk through my entry just to see how wonderful my outdoor living space was. It almost felt like I was in an Italian Villa. They had a fire pit, fountain, BBQ, and a huge covered dining room. It’s perfect for the Summer, if you do a lot of entertaining. The lovely landscape of course is how the model features the space. You will inherit a pile of dirt. Hopefully you’ll be able to create something very similar to achieve the same effect. My smile was HUGE. Love it! Love it!

To the right of the entrance is the formal dining room. It’s a great space. It’s at the foot of the stairs, which I’m not thrilled with, but in my honest opinion this space is more for show than for practical eating habits.

To the left of the entrance is a small guest bedroom and bathroom. When I say small, I mean small. I could barely squeeze in to get a picture. There are dual split closets which are a nice feature, but I didn’t find room for a television. You can stick overnight guests here, or make the space into something else.

The great room/living room isn’t overly grand. It’s just the right size to suit my tastes and has a wonderful view of the backyard. There’s a fireplace in the great room, which adds an extra element of coziness to the space.

The kitchen didn’t have as much counter space or storage as I thought. The island is huge, and accounts for a big chunk of cabinet storage, but for the price I’d pay for the house I’d expect a larger kitchen. I also would’ve liked to have seen a double oven. I’m pleased with Taylor Morrison’s kitchen designs, and I’m not trying to be overly critical. It’s a workable space.

Off the kitchen is the conservatory. It’s a rectangular room that almost has a lodge feel to it, especially if you opt to have the fireplace built into it. I’m still trying to figure out exactly what I’d do with the room. The model features it as a dining area with additional seating. It would be nice on those cold California nights to dine by firelight! I almost feel like having two fireplaces on the ground floor is excessive. I’d rather see the second fireplace in the master suite.

At the top of the stairs is the bonus room, which can either be turned into a bedroom or another space such as an entertainment or billiard room. It’s actually really nice. I wasn’t expecting this unique layout at the top of the stairs. Unless I have a large family, I’d turn this space into something really unique. I could have a lot of fun decorating. It leaves room for creativity and because the layout is so open, I feel like you’re not restricted to turning it into a bedroom.

The master bedroom is lovely—very nice. The attached master bathroom is huge. I’m very particular about my bathrooms and I did not like this bathroom. It was very chic and sexy, but because it was so big that I became a little turned off. The tub is surrounded by lots of counter space. In all practicality I’m imagining my daily beauty routine with all the bottles, shave gel, razor, loofah etc…and if I leave any of them out, the entire bathroom would look junky. I’d either have to be immaculate, diligent about putting my beauty items away, or find a clever way to conceal them! The bathroom has an entire wall of linen cabinets/storage. It’s really nice and looks pretty, but I’d be hard pressed to fill them up. I’m not THAT high maintenance!

The second bedroom had a “boxy” feel to it. The closet was too small. The bathroom was slightly larger than bedroom 3, but the narrow tub is wearing on me. I wasn’t impressed with bedroom 2.

The third bedroom was a decent size with a standard walk-in closet. Bedroom 3 has access to a deck. My experience with bedroom decks is that you either spend a lot of time on the deck or no time on the deck. Since the deck is long and narrow perhaps a bistro table with two chairs or another petite furniture configuration would work best out here. The one thing I didn’t like about the third bedroom was the small wall space between the bathroom and closet. You can fit a small dresser, but where’s the space for a television? I was thinking about the televisions in my house and wondering if they could fit in this space. Even my smallest tv might be a stretch.

One other cool feature that I wanted to mention was the study loft, located in between the bonus room and master bedroom. The model featured it with shelving, hinting at a library but I’m sure you can find other options for this space if you’re not a bibliophile.

My overall impressions of Residence 3 are positive. Would I choose to live here? No. Why? Because it’s simply too big for me. I don’t need a conservatory or a library. I would LOVE to have my backyard configured like the model. However, seeing as every plant I own dies within two weeks, I’d definitely have to hire a gardener to maintain my property. These are extra expenses resonating in my head. I think the builders did a decent job at defining Irvine luxury, but as the French would say “c’est pas mon truc!” (It’s not my thing!).

Discuss below or at Talk Irvine.