Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Recent Posts
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Investors Are Busy in Irvine’s Low-End Housing Market
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $398,900 :: 191 Lockford, Irvine CA, 92602
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
“I wonder if you can pick up any good cashflow properties there now that prices have crashed?”
If you’re patient and you do your homework, like Senator Dodd, the sky is the limit.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124545642440632999.html
Thanks for posting that article. I didn’t see that one when it came out at the time. Those guys are all crooked, aren’t they?
Good things happen to friends of Angelo…
Did he get censured for that in the Senate? Oh well, perhaps just a slap in the wrist anyway.
And FCB thought THEIR countries are all run by crooks….<snark>
Irvine Inventory
821 = 3/17/11
545 = 3/18/10
786 = 3/18/09
919 = 3/16/08
Homes like these sold for $300k in 1999.
Even with 9 Springbuck at $488k, that’s still 40% away.
Irvine has a long way to go to hit AZDave’s benchmark.
Course correction time:
Does anyone still think Irvine will hit $200/sf? I think even IR modified his to $275/sf.
Good point IHO,
I’m having trouble understanding the large decline predictions here.
The $275/sq.ft.prediction is based on what?
9 Spring Buck sold for $311/sq.ft and it’s over 30 years old.
26 Wayfarer sold for $669,000 on 8/26/2004 ~ Same model
24 Sweet Rain sold for $510,000 on 11/13/2003 ~ Same model
So keep telling yourself, “SEE, prices are up”.
The rest of us are watching the second stage of the decline.
“Does anyone still think Irvine will hit $200/sf? I think even IR modified his to $275/sf.”
Oh please ... Stop the bullshit! You’re only telling part of the story!
The home home right down the street (1 Spring Buck) sold for $683,000 on June 19, 2008. It only has 2 bedrooms, and it’s 370 sq feet smaller.
Then there’s 17 SILKLEAF, which is in the same tract, the same model, and it sold for $600,000 on May 29, 2008.
So the way I see it, homes like these in Irvine have lost about $120,000 - $150,000 in the last two and half years. And this has happened with an unprecedented effort by the govt & Federal Reserve to prevent it.
I could easily see homes like the one mentioned above, fetching prices below 300K in the future. The people that deny this, never thought we were in a bubble in the first place.
Lee, wtf are you talking about?
IHO’s claim is that people predicted $200/SF. He doesn’t see how people can predict that.
Then you quote two sales from 2008 to invalidate his claim and you say “stop the bullshit?”
He never said prices didn’t go down.
I am not saying there was no bubble. Nor am I saying that these have not dropped in price.
What I am saying is I find it hard to see all of Irvine drop to 1999 prices.
Even IrvineRenter is no longer saying that. Why are you not throwing profanity at him?
And the losses you pointed out… 20-25%. Where are the 40-50% ones that are going to be across the board in Irvine? IR says another 5% down for this year… so I guess at this rate, 2016 is when I can jump back in?
No need to be angry… just giving people a chance to clarify their stance since we’ve now seen that the gov can and will intercede.
Just give it a little more time. The only thing ‘different’ about Irvine is the desirability by people with significant amounts of cash to put down.
Irvine HO -
I have never predicted that Irvine prices will fall to 1999 prices. What I have said is that I, personally, would not pay 1 penny over the 1998 comp. I have the luxury of saying that as I do not live in Irvine nor do I care to live there so it is not my problem if it ever happens or not. On a long enough time scale, inflation will catch up. Could Irvine plateau for 20 years while that happens? Sure, but I would not want to be making interest payments in the meantime just to catch inflation.
Prices in my neck of the woods are closer to 1998 than yours and I suspect they will get there before inflation catches us. I understand that Irvine is among the flavor du jour with real estate gamers in Southern California and maybe they will keep you guys pumped up for longer than other areas. What I am saying is that I as someone who is looking at buying will avoid areas like that - the gamers can have them. I have no intention of paying a windfall to some baby boomer who benefited from the years of falling interest rates and now feels entitled to sponge off the younger generation.
@AzDave:
What do you call this… “moving the goalposts”?
From what I remember I specifically asked you if Irvine could get to 1999 non-inflated prices and you said yes. I’ll find it when I have the time.
But, since you are capitulating… what is your prediction for Irvine now?
BTW: I recall you saying if a price on a certain home drops to $250k, you’ll buy… is that going to be all cash?
It’s not moving the goal posts at all. I would not pay a dime over the ‘98 price and I stand by that. That is not “capitulating”. You are doing your usual strawman argument by setting up an argument that I supposedly made and claiming that I am not capitulating against something that I did not say.
You really need to read more carefully.
The “moving” part is in reference to your claim that prices in Irvine would go back to 1999. Now you are saying you never made such a claim. You have not denied it before this but now you are saying otherwise… that’s the capitulation.
Here you go:
Here’s another:
Whoah… 1997?!?
No straw man here… it is you that is bailing the hay.
Maybe when I have free time, I’ll find the comment where I asked you about inflation adjusted or actual prices.
Dave, do you have absolutely ANY evidence that baby boomers are the large majority of sellers, to make this claim that they are “sponging” off of the younger gen? Sounds pretty irrational to me.
Yes, ask yourself how many people who are 25 years old today were buying houses in the 80’s and early 90’s. Look at the sales prices and compare them to what they ask for in today’s market. Look at the trend in interest rates from the early 90’s to today and ask yourself which generation is benefiting over the other. Use your brain, go ahead, try it - it won’t hurt.
You write: “Savings will provide the internal capital for Ireland to prosper again.”
I respond that I do not see Ireland propering ever again.
In my blog article … European Financials Fall Turning The Euro Lower … As Exhausting Quantitative Easing Turns The Nasdaq, Technology And World Shares Shares Lower … I relate European shares, VGK, fell 3.1% lower on falling European Financials, EUFN, -3.6%.
The falling European Financials turned the Euro, FXE, 1.8% lower. Germany, EWG, -3.6%, Italy, EWI, -4.3%, Spain, EWP, -4.1%, The United Kingdom, EWU, -3.2% and Sweden, EWD, -3.1%.
Competitive currency devaluation is now underway as the US Dollar,$USD, is rising and most all currencies except the Yen and the Franc are falling.
The failure of quantitative easing is specifically seen in the trading lower of the distressed Fidelity mutual fund FAGIX, which approximates the value of the US Federal Reserves’ assets taken in under TARP, and which together with Excess Reserves, serves as the basis of Neoliberalism’s seigniorage.
Today’s rising Dollar is evidence of quantitative easing failure and also the end of neoliberalism.
Junk bonds, JNK, manifested massively bearish engulfing today providing even more evidence of the failure of neoliberalism’s seigniorage.
Failed neoliberalism means there will not be economic growth.
Failed neoliberalism also means the world is passing into The Age of Deleveraging which will be characterised by inflation destruction, debt deflation, credit ill-liquidity, instability, economic contraction and austerity.
The European Leaders are effecting a bloodless political economic coup which draws out an important concept that the rule of the sovereigns replaced neoliberalism and democracy in February and March of 2011.
The rule of the sovereigns is now the governing political and economic regime and construct.
Neoliberalism was the political and economic regime that governed mankind from the time that the Free To Choose economic theory of Milton Friedman replaced the gold standard in the early 1970s, to the exhaustion of Ben Bernanke’s quantitative easing 1 and 2 on February 22, 2011, which was reflected in the fall in value of the distressed securities, which underwrote quantitative easing, and which are approximated by the Fidelity Mutual Fund FAGIX.
It was on February 22, 2011 that the value of FAGIX, and world stocks, ACWI, both fell lower.
Under the rule of the sovereigns, leaders meet in task groups such as the Pact for Euro, that is the Pact for Competitiveness, to develop Framework Agreements.
Then leaders meet in summits to formally announce Framework Agreements, which set forth regional political and economic governance which replace treaty, constitutional and historic rule of law. The Leaders’ Agreements waive national sovereignty. One is no longer a resident of a sovereign nation state; rather one is a resident living in a region of global governance, as called fro the Club of Rome in 1974.
Government minsters and business leaders appoint stake holders who effect the mandate of the leaders which promotes global corporatism, that is combined state corporate rule. Policies are enacted which promote the security and prosperity of corporations, and enforce austerity for the people.
Neoliberalism and democracy are replaced by the rule of the sovereigns, where the word will and way of the leaders is law.
The European sovereign crisis will intensify, and out of Götterdämmerung, an investment flameout, a Sovereign, and a Seignior an Old English term for top dog banker who takes a cut, will emerge to establish a common EU Treasury with fiscal sovereignty, as well as a new seigniorage replacing the currently failing US Federal Reserve’s Quantitative Easing seigniorage; and the Bank of Japan’s failed Yen Carry Trade seigniorage.
These two will assure the security and prosperity for select corporations while providing austerity for all people. Global Corporatism and the Rule of the Sovereigns will replace Neoliberalism as the world’s economic and political regime.
Banks will become even more integrated with government; and leased property living like that presented in the 1973 movie Solyent Green will be the norm
Ummm, the YEN has been getting stronger since the disaster and the BoJ has been trying to prevent that.
3/17/11 78.89 JPY
3/16/11 79.59 JPY
3/15/11 80.72 JPY
3/14/11 81.63 JPY
3/11/11 81.84 JPY
3/10/11 82.98 JPY
3/ 9/11 82.74 JPY
3/ 8/11 82.67 JPY
3/ 7/11 82.24 JPY
3/ 4/11 82.32 JPY
3/ 3/11 82.45 JPY
3/ 2/11 81.87 JPY
3/ 1/11 81.86 JPY
2/28/11 81.78 JPY
2/25/11 81.68 JPY
2/24/11 81.89 JPY
2/23/11 82.51 JPY
2/22/11 82.77 JPY
2/21/11 83.14 JPY
I guess I wanna hear from those who insisted that inflation can not occur without a concurrent rise in wages.
what do you want to hear? that services represent 40% of overall GDP?
Even for durable(10% of gdp) and non-durable goods(20%), wages represents about half the COGS?
That raw materials/inputs for food products (such as wheat for cereal) represents less than 5% of the final product cost?
That the majority of government spend (20% of GDP) is also the purchases of services?
And yet, prices of food and energy are increasing while wages are not.