Time Estimates for Clearing Shadow Inventory Are Too Low

The latest estimate to clear shadow inventory is 40 months. Based on tightening credit standards and very low sales rates, this estimate is likely too low.

Irvine Home Address … 14 BLUEBELL Irvine, CA 92618

Resale Home Price …… $499,000

I'd rather kill myself than turn into their slave

Sometimes

I feel that I should go and play with the thunder

Somehow

Cause somehow I just don't wanna stay and wait for a wonder

I've been watching

I've been waiting

In the shadows for my time

The Rasmus — In The Shadows

How many of you lurk in the shadows waiting for lenders to release their shadow inventory? Personally, I refuse to become a debt slave, so I've been watching, and I've been waiting in the shadows for my time.

Some pundits believe Shadow Inventory Signals Three Years of Falling Prices. Some think it will take much longer. I side with the latter group.

The whole reason banks have accumulated a shadow inventory is because there are not enough buyers to replace all the delinquent borrowers — at any price. It is clear that Low Interest Rates Are Not Clearing the Market Inventory, and Low Interest Rates Will Not Create Demand. There is only one viable solution: Fix the Housing Market: Let Home Prices Fall.

Las Vegas has demonstrated that if you lower prices, sales rates go up. All estimates of time to clear the shadow inventory assume sales rates will be at or near historic norms. Right now, that isn't happening. In August Existing-Home Sales Sank to Lowest Level Ever Recorded. Inflated markets like Orange County see sales rates about 20% or more below normal.

As the economy improves and people go back to work, the sales rate will improve somewhat, but until prices are lower, sales will not improve enough to clear out the shadow inventory in a timely manner.

Further, estimates of shadow inventory are static. They are not estimating how many more homes will be added to shadow inventory as other borrowers give up and accelerate their defaults. The big false assumption here is that an improving economy will eliminate the mortgage distress and people will start paying back their loans again. That isn't going to happen. The debt is far too large. Many of the people who are hanging on will eventually succumb to the debt disease. As these people give up, they will add new delinquencies to shadow inventory.

The market needs a cathartic event. The kool aid intoxicated borrowers need to puke up their debts and clear the system. Until then, the economy will sputter as the over-indebted give up their meager incomes to keep the illusion of solvency at our major banks.

Over 7 Million 'Shadow Homes' May Take 40 Months to Clear, Says Fitch

Posted by Alex Finkelstein 11/09/10 8:00 AM EST

If you thought the U.S. housing market is showing any signs of improvement, a new report by New York City-based Fitch Ratings puts the damper on that view.

Fitch says seven million homes in the "shadows" will take 40 months to clear.

Just in case you are in the "Irvine is different" crowd, keep in mind that There are 3,600+ Distressed Properties in Irvine, and There are 36,000+ Distressed Properties in Orange County. Further, Emergence of Shadow Inventory to Push Prices Lower in 2011: Altos Research, Fiserv.

The agency defines the shadow supply of properties as loans that are delinquent, in foreclosure, or real-estate-owned (REO) by the servicer. Fitch says based on recent liquidation trends, it will take at least 3 ½ years to clear this existing distressed inventory.

DSNews.com reports that according to the ratings agency, the number of months between the date of the borrower's last payment and the date of liquidation has steadily increased over the past several years, and is now at more than 18 months on average.

Fitch says that is the highest figure on record.

Thinking About Accelerated Default? The Average Squatting Time Is Up to 449 Days. .

While the volume of newly delinquent mortgages has begun to improve in recent quarters, Fitch says liquidation rates of existing distressed properties have been constrained by weak demand and expanded initiatives to modify loans for troubled borrowers, DSNews reports.

On top of that, the agency's analysts believe the recent discovery of defects in the residential mortgage foreclosure process will further extend liquidation timelines, slowing the resolution of distressed properties in the shadow inventory and preventing home prices from finding a floor.

"While the reduced volume of distressed sales since 2009 has temporarily helped home prices, Fitch believes that the extension in foreclosure and liquidation timelines is simply prolonging the housing correction underway," the agency reported.

Government Props Weakened the Housing Market and Delayed the Recovery. Notice that Fitch is talking about a temporary bottom. They see prices rolling over too.

The total number of troubled loans reached a peak in early 2010 and had begun to show some improvement prior to the most recent foreclosure moratoriums resulting from documentation issues, Fitch said.

Fitch says for judicial foreclosure states, such as Florida, it is expected to take longer than the national average of 40 months to resolve the distressed loans, while for non-judicial foreclosure states, like California, the inventory will likely be resolved faster.

The agency points out in its report that the market's ability to absorb the supply of distressed homes has been affected by limited demand for home purchases, DSNews reports.

While interest rates are near historical lows and affordability has improved, fewer potential buyers can qualify for new loans due to the heightened credit standards, Fitch says.

Fed: Banks expect tight lending standards for foreseeable future. "In general banks have stopped tightening standards (they are already very tight), and demand has stopped falling (there is little demand for loans). …[A] special question asked banks whether their current level of lending standards remained tighter than the average level over the past decade and, if so, when they expected that standards would return to their long-run norms, assuming that economic activity progressed according to consensus forecasts. For all loan categories, substantial fractions of respondents thought that their bank's lending standards would not return to their long-run norms until after 2012 or would remain tighter than longer-run average levels for the foreseeable future."

Banks will never return to the standards to the 00s unless they want to lose a trillion dollars again. What we now consider tight standards — 20% down and conventionally amortized loans — were the standards prior to the housing bubble. All we are doing is returning to what works and what's stable.

Additionally, high unemployment, weak consumer confidence, and uncertainty about the future of home prices have prevented some potential buyers from entering the market.

"Recent concerns about the title-transfer process for foreclosed homes could further weigh on demand," Fitch noted.

The agency says at this point, it is still unclear how much the foreclosure process will be extended specifically due to document defects.

Should You Fear You Won’t Get Clean Title to Real Estate? .

However, even prior to recent developments, Fitch assumed the ultimate resolution of the backlog of distressed properties would result in further home price declines and prevent sustained home price increases for a number of years, DSNews reports.

"Fitch is currently assuming approximately a further 10 percent home price decline nationally, with the majority of the adjustment occurring by the end of 2012," the agency says.

"However, the timing of the adjustment will be affected by the timing of the distressed inventory resolution."

Absolutely correct: How The Lending Cartel Disposes Their REO Will Determine the Market’s Fate.

How long will it take? I estimate it will take five to seven more years before this mess is behind us. For three to five years, the foreclosure machines will be operating 24/7 at the maximum rate the market will absorb. After that, it will take another two to four years of elevated foreclosure volumes to finish the job. It's a bit like draining a bathtub when your drain is partially clogged. It's going to take a long time, and there isn't much that can be done to speed the process.

The Squatter's Lair

I first profiled today's featured property back in September of 2009 in the post Bluebell, and then I profiled it again in One Defaulting Owner’s Free Ride: Three Years and Counting.

  • The owner of today's featured property paid $465,000 on 10/23/2003. She used a $372,000 first mortgage, a $93,000 second mortgage, and a $0 down payment.
  • On 12/30/2004 she refinanced into an Option ARM for $486,500.
  • Two months later on 2/3/2005 she opened a HELOC for $67,000.
  • Total property debt is $553,500 plus 3 years of missed payments, negative amortization, and fees.
  • Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $88,500.

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 02/08/2010

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 12/03/2008

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 08/28/2008

Document Type: Notice of Default

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 08/08/2007

Document Type: Notice of Rescission

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 05/25/2007

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 01/24/2007

Document Type: Notice of Default

First the bank lost a great deal of money, and now a flipper is going to lose money too.

This property was purchased by a flipper (Mamo Properties Inc.) on 8/23/2010 for $470,000. I don't know what they thought they could sell this for, but it looks like they spent about $20,000 fixing the place up, and with the other costs and fees, they are likely in this for over $500,000. Unless this is a no-cost listing, the flipper is going to lose money.

While I was raising money for the fund, I told many people that I was hesitant to buy in Orange County because in July and August, I was watching flippers pay what I thought was too much, and I believed prices were going to roll over. So far, both my observations have proven correct.

How much do you think this flipper will lose on this property?

Irvine Home Address … 14 BLUEBELL Irvine, CA 92618

Resale Home Price … $499,000

Home Purchase Price … $470,100

Home Purchase Date …. 8/23/2010

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(1,040)

Percent Change ………. -0.2%

Annual Appreciation … 24.1%

Cost of Ownership

————————————————-

$499,000 ………. Asking Price

$17,465 ………. 3.5% Down FHA Financing

4.21% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$481,535 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$94,234 ………. Income Requirement

$2,358 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$432 ………. Property Tax

$150 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$83 ………. Homeowners Insurance

$160 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$3,183 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$371 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$668 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment

$26 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$62 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$2,232 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$4,990 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$4,990 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$4,815 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$17,465 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$32,260 ………. Total Cash Costs

$34,200 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$66,460 ………. Total Savings Needed

Property Details for 14 BLUEBELL Irvine, CA 92618

——————————————————————————

Beds: 2

Baths: 2 full 1 part baths

Home size: 1,508 sq ft

($331 / sq ft)

Lot Size: n/a

Year Built: 2000

Days on Market: 31

Listing Updated: 40484

MLS Number: S635284

Property Type: Condominium, Residential

Community: Oak Creek

Tract: Acac

——————————————————————————

Quiet, Cul-De-Sac location. This beautiful home shows like a model featuring maple hardwood floors, new upgraded carpet, gourmet kitchen with granite countertops and new appliances. Great floorplan with dual master suites: Oversided garage, one suite with full bath on ground level and one suite with loft/office on top level. Tropical Oasis backyard with palm trees. Enjoy resort-style amenitities such as pool and spa. Walk to shopping, dining and more!

Oversided? amenitities?

IHB Special Event

Tonight, Wednesday, November 10, 2010, at 6:30 until 9:00, there will be an IHB special event at Dave and Busters in the Irvine Spectrum. We will be gathering in the patio room to the left as you enter.

I invite all the fund investors to come out on Wednesday evening. I can give you an update on my progress in person. Also, anyone else considering investing can come out and talk to me about getting in before the November 18 closing date.

Have you been reading the IHB anonymously and quietly? I invite all the lurkers out there to attend tonight's meeting. I want to meet you.

Everyone is invited to a night of real estate talk, free appetizers and drinks, and a chance to meet with some reporters who find these IHB gatherings interesting. Please come out and show your support for the IHB.

Thank you.

Victims and Martyrs of the Housing Bubble

Everyone has a sob story from the housing bubble. Many have cast themselves as victims and martyrs. Most are victims of their own lack of financial sense.

Irvine Home Address … 39 SONGSPARROW Irvine, CA 92604

Resale Home Price …… $674,000

The crown of emptiness,

As night descended slowly

Maybe it's an illusion,

One fake dream, one grey plastic

Reality of tears and of repentance.

I felt my life crossing like

A stream of sadness

Wearing a martyr's crown

The crown of sadness

The crown of emptiness

Nightrage — Wearing a Martyr's Crown

Why do people tell sob stories? Is their real motivation to appeal to the sympathy of others in order to gain some special advantage? Should we feel bad for people who borrowed too much and give them a break? Should we let people experience the consequences of their poor decisions? If we give in to the victim mentality, we encourage people to engage in risky and foolish behavior. Why wouldn't they if they believe others will bail them out?

Woman Holds Hunger Strike To Stop Foreclosure

Baltimore Resident Wants Audience With Governor

POSTED: 6:44 pm EST November 8, 2010

BALTIMORE — A Baltimore woman fighting to keep her home has set up a mini-residence outside the state capital and is on a hunger strike in hopes of bringing more attention to the effects that foreclosure has on people.

Lauren Rymer, of Baltimore, said she's watched how the economy and other issues have forced people out of their homes.

The primary issue that has forced people out of "their" homes is the fact that they quit paying on the massive debts they took on to acquire them. Remember, Responsible Homeowners are NOT Losing Their Homes.

She started a hunger strike against foreclosure and said she's prepared to remain at the corner of Maryland Avenue and State Circle — right across the street from the state house in Annapolis — for as long as needed.

"I feel like I'm really representing a lot of people out here," she said.

Yes, there are many people just as foolish as this woman.

Rymer works for a nonprofit agency. She said she bought her two-bedroom southeast Baltimore home with an interest-only loan and still owes more than $200,000 on the mortgage.

In other words, she couldn't afford this house from the beginning. The only reasons people use interest-only financing is because they are ignorant, or they can't afford the fully amortized payment. Since she works for a non-profit, she doesn't make much money, and she doesn't have prospects for a big raise any time soon. Why would she take out an interest-only mortgage under those circumstances? Do you think she was banking on future mortgage equity withdrawal? I do.

She claimed she doesn't live beyond her means and sought help after the property taxes on her home went up 55 percent in the past couple of years.

The taxes are paid with her mortgage bill. Rymer said when it jumped from an affordable $1,500 a month to $2,100 a month, she couldn't keep up.

This womans taxes went up $7,200 a year during a period when home values declined. I call bullshit on that one.

She said she didn't realize she could have challenged the property tax assessment until it was too late.

"I just didn't understand why — at this time when times are so rough and the governor called three weeks before for (federal) banks to stop moving forward with foreclosures on their clients — the state government was moving forward with a foreclosure on mine without trying every possible channel to help me stay in my home," she said.

Borrowers are now entitled to have lenders and the government go to extreme lengths to help them, right? Is that the new entitlement that has come out of the housing bubble?

Rymer said her mortgage had been bundled and sold several times, finally ending up in the hands of the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development. In less than 45 days, she could lose the house she's owned for four years.

Wait a minute. She hasn't owned anything. She is renting money from the bank with an interest-only loan. Further she is underwater and has no equity. She owns nothing. (see Money Rentership: Housing and the New American Dream).

She is being evicted from a house that has her name on the title because she is failing to make her rent payment on the money she borrowed. This is closer to an eviction than a foreclosure.

The foreclosure notice was taped to her front door on Election Day, she said. Rymer said she wants a few minutes with Gov. Martin O'Malley to tell him it's not just about the amount of foreclosures.

"Everyone that's being affected is a human being … are people that want to have a home, and that's why they bought homes," she said.

The MDHCD told 11 News that it can't discuss a homeowner's file but it will always work with homeowners to explore every viable financial option. The agency said it has set up a meeting with Rymer about her problem.

And at that meeting they will tell her that if she catches up on her mortgage payments she can keep living in the house, and if she doesn't, she needs to get out to make room for someone who can. What else is there to say to her?

Viewer Stories: Housing Market Victims

Our culture of victimhood has plenty of great stories from the housing bubble. Some of these stories are sad, but most are people dealing with the consequences of their poor decisions.

Brenda from Las Vegas I have read all the stories and really do completely understand the concerns of all. My husband, son and I moved from California to Las Vegas in 2001 when the housing market was just starting to climb. We sold our Cali house in 3 days…made a little profit and purchased a new home in Vegas for a good deal. Hubby had a job as Engineer for Lucent Technologies and made 90K so I didn't have to work anymore. It was heaven! Then 9/11 came to pass… 25 percent of his department was laid off so we went from living really well to being financial paupers overnight. It took him over a year to find a job that paid less than half of what he had been making… and I went to work for the Clark County School District being severely underpaid for my skills. We had to re-fi our home twice to make ends meet and not lose our home. Now our house payment is 3K a month plus utilities and many bills. We are deep in debt just surviving day to day fighting to hang on as we don't want to walk away. We would re-fi again to lower the payment but our home will not appraise for the amount we need in order to do so at this time. We purchased our home for 274K and now owe 390K. If not for taking out a monthly sum from his retirement portfolio of 2,500 we would have lost all.

So somewhere along the way did this family ever consider cutting back on some of their entitlements? Perhaps a loss of income should be matched with a decline in spending? They took out $116,000 and still couldn't make ends meet? What didn't these people do wrong?

Denise from Indianapolis Two years ago I bought my home on a two-year arm, being convinced by the mortgage company I would be able to refinance before the two years were up. Well, the two years were up in September and no one will touch it. I am now being told I owe more than my house is worth. On Sept. 1 my payments went from $850.00 a month to $1,233.00, and Nov. 1 it's going up another $50.00. I am a single mom and only bring home $1,500.00 a month. I am now two months behind. The mortgage compant is not willing to work with me at all. Their only advice was to conact a realtor, which I have to pay for, and try to do a quick sale. If I can't pay my payments, how can I pay a realtor? I am losing a home that I love. The American dream is huge joke!

Listening to mortgage brokers was her mistake. Not understanding the terms of the contract she was signing was another. Those mistakes are costing her the family home.

Justine from Greeley, Colo. I have been in the mortgage industry for 40 years this fall. I have been dedicated to responsible lending. Because of the greed of the CEO and upper management of mortgage companies and banks, who left with their millions in salary and bonus each year, those of us dedicated to financing homeownership responsibly are now faced with loss of income. And I am personally faced with providing for an invalid husband and trying desperately to hold onto my own home.

How many other mortgage brokers feel the same way?

Shannon from Kansas City, Mo. My stress levels are so high that Xanex have become my best friend. My husband and I are in our mid-30s with 4 children. We both work in the corporate world and I attend college for my bachelor's degree at night because we cannot afford for me not to work while I go to school. We fell into one of those adjustable mortgages and were completely scammed to the point our mortgage went up $900 more per month and we were forced into foreclosure and bankruptcy. The bankruptcy courts do not allow us any extra money for savings so when things like life occurs and gas prices, grocery prices, cars breaking down,death in family, medical bills occur we are just completely screwed.

If two corporate employed working Americans can't make it, how do people in third world countries get by? Letting go of a few entitlements would probably help get off the Xanax.

"Average Joe" from Georgia I am 35 years old and working since high school. In the heat of the moment, I purchased a pricy home, expensive home gadgets and a porsche. Now I am bankrupt.

Do you think he sees any cause and effect in his actions and the outcome?

Mike from Merced, Calif. My wife and I bought a house we could afford. Had a 30-year fixed. We made all the payments, never refinanced. Then we got divorced and needed to sell the house. Fifteen months later, we have our second offer. Due to all the forclosures we are losing around $60,000 just to get rid of it. $6,000 out of pocket at closing, the rest is the 20 percent, plus down payment and the $13,000 worth of loan we paid down. We were responsible. We paid. Now we are losing what we had invested. Those of you who banked on good interest rates "down the road" have taken the rest of us down with you. Additionally, everyone is talking about bailing out those near foreclosure, but who's helping those who did it right, but lost tons of money? I can't even write it off as a loss on my taxes!

That is a sad story. These people did nothing wrong, but they are being wiped out anyway.

Remember, The Face of Housing Entitlement Today?

Jennifer from Red Lion, Pa. Because of the housing slump our family was able to finally afford our dream home. There are two sides to every story.

Amen, Jennifer. Amen.

Four years squatting… and counting

Today's featured property is playing the short-sale game. It appears on the MLS periodically while the negotiations over who loses what goes on. It was listed last week when I spotted it, and now it is gone again.

  • The property was purchased on 4/8/1999 for $349,000. The owners used a $313,920 first mortgage and a $35,080 down payment.
  • On 1/31/2000 they refinanced with a $346,500 first mortgage and got back most of their down payment.
  • On 8/30/2000 they obtained a stand-alone second for $35,000.
  • On 6/27/2001 they refinanced with a $388,000 first mortgage.
  • On 9/3/2004 they got a $162,500 stand-alone second.
  • On 7/8/2005 they refinanced with a $765,000 first mortgage.
  • On 9/29/2005 they got a $42,500 HELOC.
  • Total property debt is $807,500.
  • Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $493,580.
  • Total squatting time is 48 months so far.

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 09/28/2010

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 10/14/2008

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 07/19/2007

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 02/26/2007

Document Type: Notice of Default

This guy went delinquent sometime before November of 2006. He has not made a mortgage payment for as long as the IHB has been around.

How many rent or mortgage payments have you made while you have been an IHB reader?

Irvine Home Address … 39 SONGSPARROW Irvine, CA 92604

Resale Home Price … $674,000

Home Purchase Price … $349,000

Home Purchase Date …. 4/8/1999

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $284,560

Percent Change ………. 81.5%

Annual Appreciation … 5.6%

Cost of Ownership

————————————————-

$674,000 ………. Asking Price

$134,800 ………. 20% Down Conventional

4.21% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$539,200 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$127,282 ………. Income Requirement

$2,640 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$584 ………. Property Tax

$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$112 ………. Homeowners Insurance

$80 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$3,416 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$433 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$748 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment

$203 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$84 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$2,522 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$6,740 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$6,740 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$5,392 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$134,800 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$153,672 ………. Total Cash Costs

$38,600 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$192,272 ………. Total Savings Needed

Property Details for 39 SONGSPARROW Irvine, CA 92604

——————————————————————————

Beds: 4

Baths: 2 full 1 part baths

Home size: 1,946 sq ft

($346 / sq ft)

Lot Size: 5,136 sq ft

Year Built: 1976

Days on Market: 81

Listing Updated: 40464

MLS Number: Y1005246

Property Type: Single Family, Residential

Community: Woodbridge

Tract: Cust

——————————————————————————

According to the listing agent, this listing may be a pre-foreclosure or short sale.

Huge price reduction! Seller eager to sell property. Beautiful house located in a highly desirable area of Woodbridge. Very quiet neighborhood. Close to shops and schools. Seller had plans to add almost 400sq feet of living area. Blueprints will be provided to buyer at no cost. HOA provides many amenities including community swimming pools, two man-made lakes, tennis courts, sand volleyball courts plus much more! Big backyard!

Low Interest Rates Will Not Create Demand

Low interest rates are not created the demand for housing that low prices does.

Irvine Home Address … 19 GEORGETOWN 25 Irvine, CA 92612

Resale Home Price …… $439,000

Man I ain't getting nowhere

I'm just living in a dump like this

There's something happening somewhere

baby I just know that there is

You can't start a fire

you can't start a fire without a spark

This gun's for hire

even if we're just dancing in the dark

Bruce Springsteen — Dancing in the Dark

Not long ago I noted, Low Interest Rates Are Not Clearing the Market Inventory. Well, I am not the only one who has noticed. Richard Fisher, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, has also noted that low interest rates will not fix the ailing economy, but super low rates will have many deleterious effects not anticipated by others at the Fed.

Dallas Fed president: Low interest rates won't spark demand

by JACOB GAFFNEY — Monday, November 8th, 2010, 3:28 pm

The environment of exceedingly low interest rates is great for banks, according to Richard Fisher, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, but is doing little to help the overall economy get back on track.

"Despite their theoretical promise, reductions in interest rates to Lilliputian levels have not done much thus far to spark loan demand," he told the Association for Financial Professionals in San Antonio Monday.

Home loan demand is well off historic highs as Existing-Home Sales Sink to Lowest Level Ever Recorded and refinance demand has dropped because everyone either already has refinanced or they are unable to because they are under water on their mortgage. Plus, who is anxious to use low interest rates to buy assets at inflated prices? There is only one sure-fire way to stimulate demand: lower the price. Fix the Housing Market: Let Home Prices Fall.

On the weekend open thread, the clearest example of lower prices stimulating demand can be readily seen in Las Vegas:

Notice the crash in prices has resulted in a large boost in sales. Buyers in Las Vegas are currently more active than they were at the peak of the bubble.

So how is Southern California doing?

While home prices have bounced off the false bottom, the rate of sales has declined significantly from the peak and remains at very low levels? Why is that? Why are sales rates higher in Las Vegas than in Southern California relative to the peak?

It's the price.

Every once in a while I see threads in the comments where the sales strength of the market is touted. Look carefully at the charts above: sales rates are down in Southern California — way down. Anything else is spin. Yes, people are buying homes, but they are buying far fewer of them because the prices are too high. In Las Vegas more people are buying homes because the prices are lower. In fact, they are so much lower that outside people like me are buying homes because the prices are so low.

Lower prices stimulate demand, not lower interest rates.

Back to the article….

Liquidity seems to exist in other markets, notable commodities, he said. But it worries him that the money markets aren't coming back strong enough and short-term lending to small business remains restricted to a point of macroeconomic pain.

"It concerns me that liquidity is omnipresent on bank and corporate balance sheets, and yet it is not being used to hire American workers," he said.

Who are the banks going to loan that money to? The over-indebted American consumer? Few creditworthy borrowers exist in the current economic environment. Too much bank money is tied up in non-productive loans, non-productive assets, and low yield government treasuries.

Fisher claims that banks already hold over $1 trillion in excess reserves. Holdings of government securities as a percentage of total assets on bank balance sheets are growing, he said, and loans as a percentage of assets are declining.

The recent Fed cash pump, referred to as QE2, will also keep rates low and weaken the dollar, Fisher said. And the inflow may not stop at the current allotment to purchase $600 billion in Treasuries between now and the end of the second quarter of next year, which is on top of the amount projected to replace the paydown in mortgage backed-securities.

"I could not state with conviction that purchasing another several hundred billion dollars of Treasuries — on top of the amount we were already committed to buy in order to compensate for the run-off in our $1.25 trillion portfolio of mortgage-backed securities — would lead to job creation and final-demand-spurring behavior," he said. "But I could envision such action would lead to a declining dollar, encourage further speculation, provoke commodity hoarding, accelerate the transfer of wealth from the deliberate saver and the unfortunate, and possibly place at risk the stature and independence of the Fed."

Wow! A guy at the Fed who really gets it. Bernanke has openly stated he wants a weaker dollar too help stimulate inflation. The excess liquidity is bound to find its way into momentum plays as money chases the few asset classes with any real prospects and other money follows. This speculation leads to mis-allocations of resources and continued economic weakness. The theft from savers is obvious. Have you seen the interest rate on your savings account lately?

This activity should put the stature and independence of the Fed at risk. It is clear the Fed exists to promote moral hazard and prevent the normal cleansing function of recessions from occurring.

Despite the Feds best efforts, house prices in Las Vegas have crashed back to mid 90s levels, and because of it, the debt is being purged, citizens have affordable housing, sales rates are up, and the groundwork is being laid for a healthy recovery.

Because of the Feds best efforts, house prices in Orange County remain elevated at 2003-2005 prices, and because of it debt is being preserved, citizens have expensive housing, sales rates are down, and a sustained economic recovery is being delayed and weakened.

Las Vegas will prosper because once the crash has erased the excess debt, home owners will have more spending money as a percentage of their income than Orange County residents will have. This extra spending money will make its way to auto dealerships, local restaurants, and other businesses.

Borrowers in Orange County will be spending a much higher percentage of their incomes on interest and debt service, and only the hope of future mortgage equity withdrawal based on herd-induced appreciation keeps the whole system together. The local economy will suffer as local incomes are diverted to far-away interest recipients who are not stimulating the California economy. We can have high house prices or a vibrant economy, but we can't have both without Ponzi borrowing.

Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke recently defended QE2 in an editorial in The Washington Post:

“This approach eased financial conditions in the past and, so far, looks to be effective again. … Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth … lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending.”

Whenever I read one of Bernanke's statements, I assume he says stupid things like that because he has to. It frightens me that he might actually believe it. I think Greenspan believed his own bullshit.

First, easier financial conditions — whatever that means — will not necessarily promote economic growth. Bernanke's zero interest rate policy hasn't fixed things so far. It has prevented asset prices from crashing to market-clearing levels, but I consider that a failure of policy; Benanke considers that a success.

Second, lower mortgage interest rates will not allow underwater loan owners to refinance, and even if they did, they still have too much debt relative to their incomes. Financing enormous sums at 4% isn't doing borrowers any favors as long as they have too much debt.

Third, lower bond rates may not encourage businesses to invest. What will they invest in? What is there a demand for that is not already over-supplied? Real estate? LOL!

Forth, higher stock prices — when inflated by air from the Federal Reserve — are Ponzi profits likely to evaporate once the Fed stops its inflationary policies. Is this a sustained element of demand upon which we should build our economy?

Fisher said he is already seeing foreign money go to other lands, funds that would normally be diverted into the American economy and that if more careful steps aren't taken, the nations can experience "super ordinary" levels of inflation.

The sad part of our policy is that we will export the inflation we tried to create at home. Japan's decades-long low interest rate policy helped inject excess liquidity into other Asian economies over the last 20 years, yet inflation in Japan remains elusive. It's hard to say where our excess liquidity will end up. China perhaps? Like water seeking its natural level, the liquidity will flow somewhere, and that isn't likely to be into the inflated real estate values in Southern California. With such low cap rates and only the prospect of Ponzi profits, why would rational money flow there? To pick up "investments" like today's featured property?

Orange County's version of a cashflow property

Most investors in Orange County who claim they are cashflow investing are still buying because they plan on obtaining and spending the price appreciation as income. it isn't true cashflow investing. Today's featured property is the type of property a cashflow investor should look for. It is near the university, so it is easy to rent, and it is relatively small, so there is not as much maintenance. The HOAs are ridiculously high, and so is the price relative to rents, but if you can extract equity to boost your returns, properties like this can be profitable. The problem is that appreciation is not stable and consistent, and it may or may not materialize. Contrary to popular belief, it will not materialize here to any degree over the next several years. As a true cashflow investment, this one is a loser.

  • This property was purchased on 8/3/1999 for $235,000. The owner used a $223,250 first mortgage and a $11,750 down payment. Even at that price, this isn't a particularly good cashflow investment. With the huge HOA, this property doesn't start to be attractive until it gets below $150,000.
  • On 11/30/1999 he opened a $24,750 HELOC. Think how that boosted his return.
  • On 11/6/2000 he obtained another HELOC for $47,000. If you can extract an additional $20,000 a year from the property, suddenly the cashflow looks much better. Of course, since that is an unsustainable Ponzi scheme, I don't consider that much of an investment.
  • On 11/15/2001 he refinanced the first mortgage for $236,000 and obtained a $29,500 stand-alone second.
  • On 9/23/2002 he refinanced with a $260,000 first mortgage and obtained a $32,000 HELOC. Notice the steady mortgage equity withdrawals are mimicking income. In reality, he is steadily increasing his debt.
  • On 3/3/2004 he refinanced with a $260,000 first mortgage and obtained a $223,000 HELOC.
  • On 1/4/2006 he obtained a $60,000 HELOC.
  • On 3/1/2006 he refinanced with a $480,000 first mortgage.
  • On 3/17/2006 he obtained a private party loan for $150,000. Given the short timeframe between the two loans, I wonder if the private party knew he was subordinate to that huge new first mortgage?
  • Total property debt is $630,000.
  • Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $406,750 over a seven year stretch. If you believe that is sustainable, this property was a tremendous bargain when he purchased it in 1999. Since this has proven not to be sustainable, it was a costly mistake. He made good money during the bubble, but now he doesn't have any income from this property, and his credit is ruined. In this instance, I would rather be the tortoise than the hare.

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 06/16/2010

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 01/04/2010

Document Type: Notice of Default

Irvine Home Address … 19 GEORGETOWN 25 Irvine, CA 92612

Resale Home Price … $439,000

Home Purchase Price … $439,000

Home Purchase Date …. 4/4/1999

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(26,340)

Percent Change ………. -6.0%

Annual Appreciation … 0.0%

Cost of Ownership

————————————————-

$439,000 ………. Asking Price

$15,365 ………. 3.5% Down FHA Financing

4.29% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$423,635 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$83,696 ………. Income Requirement

$2,094 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$380 ………. Property Tax

$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$37 ………. Homeowners Insurance

$282 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$2,793 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$332 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$579 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment

$24 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$55 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$1,961 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$4,390 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$4,390 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$4,236 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$15,365 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$28,381 ………. Total Cash Costs

$30,000 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$58,381 ………. Total Savings Needed

Property Details for 19 GEORGETOWN 25 Irvine, CA 92612

——————————————————————————

Beds: 2

Baths: 2 full 1 part baths

Home size: 1,457 sq ft

($309 / sq ft)

Lot Size: n/a

Year Built: 1983

Days on Market: 87

Listing Updated: 40480

MLS Number: L33738

Property Type: Condominium, Residential

Community: University Town Center

Tract: Cc

——————————————————————————

According to the listing agent, this listing may be a pre-foreclosure or short sale.

APPROVED SHORT SALE at $450,000.00 !! 2 Bedroom , 3 bath attached condo. With upgraded kitchen, granite counters and custom cabinets. Great location, near Univeristy High School and UCI.

IHB Special Event

Tomorrow night, Wednesday, November 10, 2010, at 6:30, there will be an IHB special event at Dave and Busters in the Irvine Spectrum. We will be gathering in the patio room to the left as you enter.

We have a long history of these events. Back in 2007, the first meetings were held when we still kept our identities secret. The biggest meeting was two years ago in November 2008, when I revealed my identity on the cover of the OC Register and held the big book-signing event for The Great Housing Bubble.

We have continued our meetings on and off over the last two years. During the summer, we held a number of meetings to raise money for the fund. I want to invite all the fund investors to come out on Wednesday evening. I can give you an update on my progress in person. Also, anyone else considering investing can come out and talk to me about getting in before the November 18 closing date.

One thing that was interesting about the investor meetings was how many long-term readers attended these events — readers I had never met. I would like to invite all the lurkers out there to attend as well.

Everyone is invited to a night of real estate talk, free appetizers and drinks, and a chance to meet with some reporters who find these IHB gatherings interesting. Please come out and show your support for the IHB.

Thank you.

A Plan to Transfer Losses on Jumbo Toxic Mortgages to Taxpayers (repost)

Due technical difficulties with our threaded comments, we closed the comments on the original post. The entire post is now here, and comments are open.

Do you want to pay the losses from jumbo loans — big loans to rich people — with your taxes?

Irvine Home Address … 7 PEPPERCORN Irvine, CA 92603

Resale Home Price …… $767,000

We be fallin up (up)

Never fallin down (down)

We keep it at a higher level elevating now,

(put it in your) in your area,

(city or your) town,

Black Eyed Peas — Fallin' Up

In our modern mortgage era, nearly all loans are backed by the US government. At one time we had something resembling a free market, but the quasi-governmental entities Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae crowded out much of the mortgage market, and when they were taken over by the Treasury department, they basically took over the mortgage market together with the FHA.

The GSEs and the FHA were originally intended to provide mortgages to lower and middle income Americans who where not being served by the free market. Rich people can get loans because they have assets and often high incomes.

There hasn't been much need to subsidize rich people, and there isn't much support among the electorate for such subsidies. That is why we have a conforming limit to GSE and FHA loans. Raising this conforming limit would offer a government subsidy to wealthy or high-income borrowers. It would also give opportunity for lenders to refinance many of their toxic jumbo loans into government-backed toxic loans and shift losses to the US taxpayer.

Total Mortgage founder: Increase jumbo loan limit nationwide to spur the market

by CHRISTINE RICCIARDI — Thursday, October 28th, 2010

John Walsh is founder and president of Total Mortgage Services, a direct mortgage lender and broker based in Milford, Conn. For this edition of In This Corner, Walsh gives his take on the jumbo loan market and the limit restrictions imposed across the country.

HousingWire recently spoke with an analyst who said jumbo loans are now performing similarly to the subprime market during the housing bubble. The delinquency rate for this type of mortgage is becoming abnormally high. How does this compare to your experience in the marketplace?

There's been a large loss in value in the jumbo market that has to do with a number of factors: the loss of liquidity on the jumbo side and the fact that there are fewer jumbo outlets has put further pressure on the jumbo housing market. I think that's the reason why there are troubles in that sector.

Let's put the horse back in front of the cart. The reason there is less liquidity and fewer jumbo outlets is because 10% of the borrowers are delinquent, and there is no government agency stepping up to take these losses. The lack of liquidity is the symptom of the market's real trouble: delinquent borrowers.

As far as a percentage decline in value, the jumbo market seems to have been hit extremely hard which has contributed to the performance on those loans — a lot of those jumbo loans are underwater.

That being said, prices have gotten to somewhere near a low.

What tea leaves did he read to come to that conclusion?

With the mortgages that we're giving out today, the loan-to-value requirements are a lot steeper, the credit score requirements are a lot steeper, the debt-to-income requirements are a lot more stringent. So I think the jumbo loans being written today as opposed to the ones written even as little as six months ago or a year ago, are going to perform significantly better. That's why you're beginning to see an ease on the jumbo side of loans.

The tightening of requirements he is talking about has also reduced the number of borrowers in the jumbo loan pool considerably. Think about how many homes are priced over $1,000,000 in Orange County, and pair that with the number of borrowers who can actually qualify for and make the payments on a jumbo loan — not factoring in mortgage equity withdrawal to make Ponzi payments. The supply of these homes greatly exceeds the potential demand.

There's also a lot of legacy jumbo problems which I think is just a function of the value of homes.

The legacy problems are a function fo the value of homes? I thought the problems were because lenders were insanely stupid and gave out huge loans to anyone with a pulse. And in fact, it was giving out those stupid loans with inflated the housing bubble and a created the problem with home values we have today.

There was a lot of no income (documentation) loans that were done on jumbo borrowers — that seemed to be the way a lot of the jumbo loans were done. A lot of places did no income option ARMs. So a lot of those problems, that's what you're seeing now from a legacy side of things.

Legacy loans: a feel-good euphemism for everything stupid in the housing bubble. The word legacy almost makes it sound regal, just, and important, like something meant for the aristocracy. I say we let the aristocracy eat the legacy loan cake they baked.

Going forward, the loans that are being written today are significantly better credit risks. That's why you're beginning to see some liquidity in the jumbo market.

As far as the demand for jumbo loans, where do you see most of the demand coming from? What kind of loans are these?

We don't really do commercial lending, so it's all residential lending on the jumbo side. The jumbo side is not really regional, there's just more people calling about them these days. I would say demand is up at least 25% over the past couple of months. We're beginning to refinance some of our customers from two, three, four years ago that got really good jumbo mortgage rates, but because the rates have come down so much, they're beginning to come into that area where a refinance makes sense. We have seen a fairly significant uptick in the jumbo refinances recently.

Phone calls asking about jumbo loans is not demand. I can imagine the calls he must be getting…

Qualified borrowers is real demand, and that kind of jumbo loan demand is not increasing with near 10% unemployment.

You mentioned in a statement that you believe conforming loan limits should be raised across the country, not just in "high-cost areas." What do you mean high-cost areas? How would this change affect the market?

There's a conforming jumbo now, so in certain areas of the country you can go and get virtually the same prices as a conforming loan and get the loan to go to either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Normally the conforming loan limit is $417,000, but in certain areas you can go up to $729,750 as a mortgage amount. That's only in 20 metropolitan areas. So even though you're in one town, where you may only be able to go up to $650,000, in another town the limit is $729,000. So it varies from ZIP code to ZIP code. My thought is you should expand that increased conforming loan limit countrywide because a lot of people fall between $417,000 and $729,750.

Do the taxpayers want to subsidize loans between $417,000 and $729,750 everywhere? I think it is a ripoff for the taxpayer that those loans are insured here, but to do that everywhere would simply expose the taxpayer to more risk.

It would put a lot more people in the purchase market that wouldn't necessarily qualify under the jumbo program, but may qualify under this particular program. You also bring FHA into the possibility, which is 3.5% down up to $729,750. I think it would expand a ton of potential, not only buyers and a lot more purchases in the range $417,00 to $729,750, but also allow a lot of people to refinance and take advantage of these unbelievably, historically low rates.

We may be able to re-inflate the housing bubble nationally if we allowed 3.5% down loans up to $729,750. I don't think that would be a good thing, particularly since the taxpayer would be absorbing all the losses when the echo bubble burst.

A lot of people just don't qualify based on their loan-to-value; a lot of people have lost so much equity they can't capitalize on these low rates. And if all these people have the ability to refinance, you're looking at a lot of people saving money, a lot more money being pumped into the economy from a refinancing perspective. From a purchasing perspective, obviously when people buy a home they hire more contractors and go to Home Depot more. The good things that happen when people buy houses will happen and spur the purchase market even more all across the country; not in just these defined areas.

I am always amazed that people think you can borrow your way out of debt. Excessive debt is the problem. Adding to that debt is not a viable solution, and neither is refinancing excessive debt at a lower interest rate.

I think that could be a great thing on top of all the things the government is trying to do.

I think it is a terrible thing to do just as the other failed things the government is trying to do.

It's not like the short sale refinance program where they're actually going to subsidize the write down or the mortgages. This is just you're taking on a larger loan size.

Great idea: take on more debt because you can't afford the debt you already have. Brilliant!

I think it's a great time because the underwriting standards have gotten so much more stringent these days you're getting a lot more qualified borrowers.

Why hasn't the government already put in place some policy to deal with jumbo loans?

I'm sure there's a rationale as to why they only did it in pocket areas. I think they did it upon median income in particular areas. I sort of understand why they did it, but my philosophy in that area is this: just because you live in Fairfield, Conn., you have the ability to take advantage of this program. But if you live in Omaha, Neb., and you have a loan amount that meets the value of the home and you still have to meet the same underwriting guidelines, why can't you, in Nebraska, take advantage of that particular program? Again to spur more purchase activity and also to take advantage of lower rates for the ability to refinance and put more money back into the economy.

This idea is dumb for many reasons, but as the jumbo loans losses continue to mount, expect to see this dumb idea resurface. Personally, I don't want to become liable for the extravagant borrowing of fools with huge losses on their jumbo loans. As you read about today's featured borrower, ask yourself if you want to pay his bill.

Buy, refi, and bye-bye

Most of the foreclosure properties I see today have this familiar pattern: fools overpays during the bubble, and as prices go up, they add to their bloated mortgages until finally they implode and lose their property. Many of these people borrow enough to recoup their down payment and get some extra money out of the bank, and some do not. The owner of today's featured property had access to his entire down payment, but unless he used the HELOC, he may have left the down payment in the bank.

  • This property was purchased for $720,000 on 7/16/2004. The owner used a $575,200 first mortgage, and a $144,800 down payment.
  • On 8/8/2005 he refinanced for $584,600 and recovered some of his down payment.
  • On 10/14/2005 he opened a $180,000 HELOC.
  • He quit paying in late 2008, and he squatted for about 21 months before the auction.

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 07/08/2010

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 05/11/2009

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 02/05/2009

Document Type: Notice of Default

The flipper that purchased the property at auction is playing games with the listing price. This is the slow grinding loss of imaginary equity.

Date Event Price
Nov 04, 2010 Price Changed $767,000
Oct 23, 2010 Price Changed $772,000
Oct 15, 2010 Price Changed $775,000
Oct 01, 2010 Price Changed $779,000
Sep 23, 2010 Price Changed $785,000
Sep 17, 2010 Price Changed $789,000
Sep 01, 2010 Listed $795,000

Irvine Home Address … 7 PEPPERCORN Irvine, CA 92603

Resale Home Price … $767,000

Home Purchase Price … $661,500

Home Purchase Date …. 8/23/2010

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $59,480

Percent Change ………. 9.0%

Annual Appreciation … 60.7%

Cost of Ownership

————————————————-

$767,000 ………. Asking Price

$153,400 ………. 20% Down Conventional

4.21% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$613,600 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$144,845 ………. Income Requirement

$3,004 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$665 ………. Property Tax

$225 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$128 ………. Homeowners Insurance

$222 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$4,244 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$704 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$851 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment

$231 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$96 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$3,015 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$7,670 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$7,670 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$6,136 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$153,400 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$174,876 ………. Total Cash Costs

$46,200 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$221,076 ………. Total Savings Needed

Property Details for 7 PEPPERCORN Irvine, CA 92603

——————————————————————————

Beds: 3

Baths: 2 full 1 part baths

Home size: 2,046 sq ft

($375 / sq ft)

Lot Size: n/a

Year Built: 2004

Days on Market: 66

Listing Updated: 40486

MLS Number: P750630

Property Type: Condominium, Residential

Community: Quail Hill

Tract: Laur

——————————————————————————

A True Turnkey Property with An Incredibly Open And Spacious Floor Plan Boasting High Ceilings, Plantation Shutters, Hardwood Flooring, New Paint, and Stainless Steel Appliances!!! Along with the Bedrooms there is any Extra DEN downstairs & LIVING AREA upstairs!!! Customized Tiles and Kitchen with Granite Countertops and Stainless Steel Appliances with a Brand New Wine Cooler! Boasts a TRUE Master Bedroom Features Walk-In Closet, Private Balcony, Dual Sinks, Roman Tub & Separate Shower. Inside Separate Laundry Rooom And Plenty Of Storage. This Fantastic End Unit Share Only 1 Wall. Situated In A Quiet Location Of A Very Desireable Complex Located In The Heart Of Irvine. Close to Restaurants, Theater And Shopping. Close To The Toll Road And It Is One Of Irvine's Newest complexes.

Why is this in Title Case?

Do you feel the excitement with the exclamation points!!!