Properties take a long time from the initial financial stress of the owner through foreclosure and on to sale in the open market. Today’s featured property is nearly two years into its journey.
Asking Price: $519,900
Address: 75 Burlingame, Irvine, CA 92602
How Long — The Eagles
Well I wish I lived in the land of fools,
no one knew my name
But what you get is not quite what you choose
Tell me, how long, how long
I first featured today’s property in the post Burlingame Over on July, 26, 2007. In fact, I still have the pictures from that listing, so that puts me one ahead of the listing agent. I do like his pretty REO sign out front though.
Based on the previous listing, this homeowner was either a flipper or someone who was overextended from the start and wanted to get out. The financial distress of being a loanowner finally caused them to default at the end of 2007. A formal notice of default is issued at least 90 days after missing the first payment, so we can assume by the 4/10/2008 NOD, that this owner has not made a payment since December of 2007, and maybe even further back than that.
Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 02/06/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)
Document #: 2009000052970
Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 04/10/2008
Document Type: Notice of Default
Document #: 2008000164962
The records show the lender took ten months from NOD to NOT. This is supposed to be a 90 day process; seven full months were added to the process. That is seven months of free rent in addition to the seven a homedebtor automatically gets in the foreclosure process.
Once the bank finally decided to foreclose, they did do it promptly. The action took place on 3/2/2009 and the H&R BLOCK BANK paid $611,036 for the property.
Based on what I am seeing, unless the foreclosure process picks up later in the real estate cycle, rather than this problem being resolved by 2013, it will probably drag out until 2016 or later. There will be no meaningful price appreciation until the foreclosure problem is behind us.
Asking Price: $519,900
Income Requirement: $129,975
Downpayment Needed: $103,980
Monthly Equity Burn: $4,333
Purchase Price: $712,500
Purchase Date: 5/31/2006
Address: 75 Burlingame, Irvine, CA 92602
Beds: | 2 |
Baths: | 2 |
Sq. Ft.: | 1,664 |
$/Sq. Ft.: | $312 |
Lot Size: | – |
Property Type: | Condominium |
Style: | Contemporary |
Stories: | 2 |
Floor: | 1 |
Year Built: | 2000 |
Community: | Northpark |
County: | Orange |
MLS#: | P689224 |
Source: | SoCalMLS |
Status: | Active |
On Redfin: | 1 day |
two bedroom and loft area close to pool and greenbelt area
Another I-don’t-give-a-shit description.
This property was purchased on 5/31/2006 for $712,500–let that sink in for a moment. Someone paid that much for a 2 bedroom 2 bath condo and thought it was rational. Anyway, the owner used a $676,875 first mortgage and a $35,625 downpayment. Since this was purchased right at the peak, there were no further refinances.
If this property sells for its current asking price, and if a 6% commission is paid, the total loss will be $233,794. The property is being offered for 27% off its peak purchase price.
It is still overpriced.
BTW, I thought you might find this 20 year rollback interesting. It is a condo in Corona selling for less than its 1989 sales price. The 1989 sale was near the peak of the previous bubble, and I long suspected we would find a rollback like this one in our area. This isn’t a trashout. The only reason it has rolled back 20 years is because that is what it is worth to a cashflow investor today. If the previous bubble got 20 years ahead of current valuations, how far ahead of time was the Great Housing Bubble?