Irvine payment affordability skyrockets, hits new 11-year high

Over the last few months, falling interest rates, falling prices, and rising rents have made payment affordability hit an eleven-year high.

Irvine Home Address … 14772 DONCASTER Rd Irvine, CA 92604

Resale Home Price …… $505,000

Work it harder,

make it better

Do it faster,

makes us stronger

More than ever,

Hour after

Our work is never over

Daft Punk — Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger Lyrics

For the first time in the nearly five years I have been writing for this blog, prices across most of Irvine are trading at or below rental parity. There are significant market headwinds which will likely prevent house prices from moving higher, so relatively affordable prices may be with us for a while, and I think that is great news.

Today, we are going to take a detailed look at the Irvine data. This is the same data I present in our monthly OC housing market presentations. We will be taking December off, but we will be back in January to provide a live presentation of the current market data.

Months of Supply

In October and November, months of supply typically increases. Many sellers keep their homes on the market hoping for a late-year sale, but the demand dries up. With low demand and large supply, the months-of-supply calculations move much higher. The market is undeniably weak, but these numbers make circumstances look worse than they really are.

The importance of rental parity

I write frequently about rental parity because it represents the threshold of affordability. When prices are above rental parity, it costs more to own than to rent, so owning is not a wise financial decision. Owning may still be right for people, and many are willing to pay the premium to own to obtain the emotional benefits of ownership; however, on a purely financial basis, paying more than rental parity is generally not wise.

When prices are below rental parity, it costs less to own than to rent, so owning under these circumstances is generally a wise choice. Since a buyer who pays less than rental parity for a house is saving money, there is a clear financial benefit obtained irrespective of fluctuations in resale price.

When the cost of ownership is less than rental parity, an owner is far less likely to be forced to sell at a loss. The property can always be rented to cover costs rather than sell for a loss. Further, this ability to rent and at least break even provides the owner with flexibility to move if necessary. Mobility to take a new job or buy a different house is denied to those who overpaid and who are stuck paying more in the cost of ownership than they can obtain in rent.

With these advantages, buying at a price below rental parity using fixed-rate financing is critical. Every buyer should consider rental parity in their buying decision.

How rental parity is calculated

Each month I calculate rental parity using aggregate data from the MLS. It requires two data points to make the calculation:

  1. Average rental rate
  2. Current mortgage interest rate on 30-year fixed-rate loans.

I also make some key assumptions.

First, as mentioned previously, I assume a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. It's the only mortgage product which provides sufficient payment stability to ensure the property will always be affordable.

Second, only a percentage of the rent can be put toward a mortgage payment. It's not as simple as assuming the rent equals the payment.

The payment is generally smaller than the actual cost of ownership (today's featured property is a rare exception). The cost of ownership usually includes other costs like HOA dues, Mello Roos, maintenance expenses, and insurance. These costs erode the buying power of the rental payment. There are offsets with tax breaks and loan amortization, but generally, the cost of ownership is bigger than the payment.

Conventional financing

There are two assumptions which change depending on the type of financing used. A buyer using conventional financing does not pay private mortgage insurance or FHA insurance premiums. This means the cost of ownership is much closer to the actual payment. Or looked at another way, the rent which would be applied to the payment would be higher. When I make these calculations, I assume 90% of the rent could go toward making a loan payment. In areas with no HOAs or Mello Roos (like today's featured property) that assumption is too low, but in areas where the HOA and Mello Roos is high, the assumption is too high.

I take 90% of the aggregate rent as a potential loan payment. I calculate the mortgage balance such a payment would service at today's interest rate. The result is the loan component of rental parity. To the loan balance, I add an appropriate down payment. For conventional buyers, the down payment applied is 20%.

For example, if an area or zip code has an aggregate rent of $2,500 — a common number in Irvine — I will assume $2,250 is available to make a mortgage payment. At 4% interest, a $2,250 payment would service an astounding $471,288. If $471,288 were the loan balance, the down payment would be $117,822. The sum of those two is $589,110 which represents the rental parity equivalent of a $2,250 payment applied to a 4% fixed-rate mortgage using conventional terms.

FHA financing

FHA financing yields very different results, so I track both of these separately. The two main differences are the mortgage insurance and the lesser down payment. With FHA financing, I assume only 75% of the rent goes toward the loan payment, and the down payment is only 3.5%.

In the example above, the $2,500 rent yields only $1,875 toward a loan payment. At 4% interest, a $1,875 payment only services $392,740. Further, a 3.5% down payment means the borrower is only adding $14,244 to the loan balance. The resulting rental parity for an FHA buyer is only $404,984 instead of the $589,110 for the conventional buyer.

The added costs and smaller down payments make houses much less affordable for FHA borrowers than they are for conventional borrowers. It's the main reason Irvine and other move-up communities are maintaining higher prices while those communities dominated by FHA financing are experiencing more serious declines.

Data for buyers using conventional financing

The following two graphics show the state of house prices relative to rental parity for buyers using conventional financing in Irvine, CA. Notice that prices are the lowest relative to rental parity of any time over the last 11 years.

Nearly every zip code and Village in Irvine is at or below rental parity. The lone exceptions are the Villages in the 92603 zip code of Turtle Rock, Turtle Ridge, Quail Hill and Shady Canyon.

Data for buyers using FHA financing

The following two graphics show the state of house prices relative to rental parity for buyers using FHA financing in Irvine, CA. Prices for FHA buyers are still inflated, although the recent declines have put them at nine-year lows.

The FHA data may be a bit misleading because FHA insurance used to be much less expensive than it is today. Prices are still inflated for FHA buyers, but it may not have been quite as inflated a few years ago when FHA insurance was much more affordable.

Year-over-year percentage change

Real estate market exhibit strong seasonal patterns and a strong tendency to trend for long periods. The only way to gain an accurate understanding of what's happening in the market is to ignore the month-to-month fluctuations and focus on year-over-year changes.

Further, I prefer to look at data on a per-square-foot basis. The median is too susceptible to fluctuations based on the change of mix to be reliable. Looking at per-square-foot costs provides a more accurate picture of what buyers are obtaining for their money.

As you can see, prices are falling all over Irvine. On a per-square-foot basis, prices are down nearly 10% year-over-year, and they have been falling at that pace for the last 4 months. Much of the increase in affordability is explained by this decline in price.

The other factor which has improved the rental parity picture is a firming of rents over the last year. Rents stopped their decline in late 2010, and rents have been climbing at a slow but steady pace ever since.

The zip code showing the most weakness is still 92620 which is Northwood and Woodbury. Rents finally turned positive in the last two months after a year of steady declines.

The bottom line is that prices are falling, interest rates are falling and rents are rising. That combination of factors is making houses much more affordable, and this trend should continue through the winter until the season spring rally bumps prices up a bit.

Short-Sale and REO Workshop

Shevy Akason and Larry Roberts will host a short sale and REO workshop at 6:30 PM Wednesday, November 16, 2011, at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618).

Long term owners who went Ponzi

The previous owners of today's featured property bought so long ago their purchase is not on my database. Their taxable basis was $93,605 which suggests they likely bought in the 1970s. By 4/6/1999 they had increased their first mortgage to $169,600. They followed by refinancing a few times including a $343,000 HELOC on 6/21/2005 and a $270,000 mortgage on 8/28/2006. The bank took the property back on 2/14/2011 for $238,000. They did get to squat for a while…

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 12/01/2010

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 08/12/2010

Document Type: Notice of Default

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 12/09/2010

Document Type: Notice of Default

Their loss is your gain

In real estate many times buyers profit at the expense of distressed or motivated sellers. The Ponzi who dumped this property on the bank is long gone, but now the bank has to deal with the property. Bank REO is, by definition, distressed property.

The point of this post is to demonstrate how affordable the combination of lower prices and low interest rates is having on affordability. Today's featured property is a 2,336 SF three bedroom two bath home with a monthly cost of ownership for a conventional buyer of $1,884. This house would certainly rent for much more than $1,884 per month.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

This property is available for sale via the MLS.

Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707

949.769.1599

sales@idealhomebrokers.com

Irvine House Address … 14772 DONCASTER Rd Irvine, CA 92604

Resale House Price …… $505,000

Beds: 3

Baths: 2

Sq. Ft.: 2336

$216/SF

Property Type: Residential, Single Family

Style: One Level, Traditional

Year Built: 1970

Community: El Camino Real

County: Orange

MLS#: S679315

Source: CRMLS

Status: Active

On Redfin: 2 days

——————————————————————————

BANK OWNED!!! New carpet and paint throughout. Great curb appeal, single level with lots of space for a growing family. Additional family room, dining room perfect for entertaining or easily converted to bedroom. Added wetbar. Mirrored wardrobe doors in master, nice fireplace in family room. Gated front courtyard. Close to schools, shopping and freeway. Excellent Irvine school district

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

Proprietary IHB commentary and analysis

Resale Home Price …… $505,000

House Purchase Price … $238,000

House Purchase Date …. 2/1/2011

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $236,700

Percent Change ………. 99.5%

Annual Appreciation … 93.8%

Cost of Home Ownership

————————————————-

$505,000 ………. Asking Price

$101,000 ………. 20% Down Conventional

4.06% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$404,000 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$96,218 ………. Income Requirement

$1,943 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$438 ………. Property Tax (@1.04%)

$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$105 ………. Homeowners Insurance (@ 0.25%)

$0 ………. Private Mortgage Insurance

$0 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$2,486 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$316 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$576 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment (Amortization)

$144 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$146 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$1,884 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$5,050 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$5,050 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$4,873 ………. Interest Points

$17,675 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$32,648 ………. Total Cash Costs

$39,200 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$71,848 ………. Total Savings Needed

——————————————————————————————————————————————————-

18 thoughts on “Irvine payment affordability skyrockets, hits new 11-year high

  1. awgee

    I think that placing too much emphasis on rental parity may be a bit short sighted. Yeah, maybe you can buy for less than you can rent, but that is right now. That doesn’t mean that you may not lose all your equity due to deceasing values or become upside down in the future.

    1. IrvineRenter

      I believe prices will fall further, and they will stay low for quite some time, but that doesn’t mean a buyer from today will necessarily lose money. Anyone buying with a cost below rental parity can rent the property out until prices come back. That stands in stark contrast to those who bought during the bubble who need to sell in order to stop the monthly bleeding.

      IMO, prices will get much more sticky on the way down once they fall below rental parity because buyers at those price points are not nearly as distressed as buyers to paid more than rental parity.

      1. awgee

        “Anyone buying with a cost below rental parity can rent the property out until prices come back.”

        Fairly good point, but … the owner has to live someplace. And from a strictly financial standpoint, there can be a large opportunity cost to tying up or losing down payment equity.

        I don’t know if comparing recent prices to bubble prices is relevant either. My wife likes to tell me she saved money by not buying something. I never quite know how to respond.

        1. IrvineRenter

          “And from a strictly financial standpoint, there can be a large opportunity cost to tying up or losing down payment equity.”

          That’s one of the reasons we include the opportunity cost in our cost of ownership calculations. Most people ignore this cost.

          BTW, I went to Peter Schiff’s presentation last week. I am starting to change my mind about gold, at least until we hit the top of the next interest rate cycle. We are going to print our way out of debt and devalue our currency. Gold will do well until interest rates move much, much higher.

          1. awgee

            ” … at least until we hit the top of the next interest rate cycle. We are going to print our way out of debt and devalue our currency. Gold will do well until interest rates move much, much higher.”

            Well, it seems we agree on something. 🙂

          2. matt138

            went to the Barclay presentation as well. i want to see Planet Reality eat his words with a fork and spoon when this treasury bubble bursts, we default, and rates are in the stratosphere.

            What did schiff say some 40% of US debt rolls over in the next year? USA = Option ARM on a teaser rate.

            Is it true Gerald Celente and clients lost $ during this MF Global BK because they were invested in PAPER gold? They were betting on paper, not gold. That is a big argument for owning physical PMs only.

            Eric sprott has a portfolio allocation of 80% PMs. I think his net worth is > $1B. He might be one of the wealthiest on the planet once this debt/fiat currency debacle has run its course.

          3. matt138

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W02n-wjPqNE&feature=feedu

            Celente paper gold kneecapping.

            If you are going to invest in gold, physical is the only way to go IrvineRenter. Welcome aboard. the occupy movement would be much wiser and more effective to just stay home and swap cash for gold coins. Capitalism cannot exist / will not function efficiently without honest money and market interest rates. All else results in massive distortion and economic inefficiency.

            I remember the gold debates in the forums on this blog back when. as we exit the eye of this economic hurricane, gold prices – ‘we aint seen nuthin yet’

  2. Clueless

    Maybe I missed this, but what are you using for you average rental prices? Where did you come up with this number?

    all I saw is this:
    “For example, if an area or zip code has an aggregate rent of $2,500 — a common number in Irvine — I will assume $2,250 is available to make a mortgage payment.”

    1. IrvineRenter

      I am getting the rental numbers straight from the MLS data. This data does not include Irvine Company apartments.

      1. Clueless

        Do you think that is an accurate way to get rental data? Not that I know any better way but I have never ever looked for rentals through the MLS. I would guess that a very large number of rentals are not posted on the MLS or at least it is only the higher end homes that may typically be rented through the MLS. Don’t most people look for rentals via craigslist, westside rentals or other means?

        Again I am not really sure, but you could be using a vastly inaccurate input for rentals into your analysis. Just questioning your data. Wondering if garbage in, garbage out is happening here.

        1. IrvineRenter

          A significant number of rentals are leased outside the MLS, but a great many are on the MLS as well. There is no shortage of rental data. In fact, there is often more rental data than sales data. It’s easier to rent a home than it is to sell it. With so many data points on the MLS, I have to believe it is a reasonable representation of what is going on in the market.

  3. Perspective

    Jumbo Mortgage Holders Pose Highest Risk of Strategic Default
    Los Angeles Times (11/13/11) Harney, Kenneth R.
    A new Moody’s study has determined that homeowners with jumbo mortgages now constitute “greater strategic default risk” than any other type of borrowers. A steep number of jumbo loan owners continue to be dogged by negative equity. More than 50 percent of the jumbos that Moody’s analyzed in which owners are still making payments have home market values lower than their outstanding loan balances.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-harney-20111113,0,200940.story

  4. Casual Observer

    Sorry. The concept of “rental parity” based only on a comparison of ‘average rentals via MLS’ and the calculation of what that amounts to in terms of a 30 year, conventional fixed rate loan with no PMI, is, simply, too simple for single-family homes in Orange County. Even as long ago as 1975 some single family homes in the county had HOA fees. And that was long before Mello-Roos became a resident. Yes, there are some tax benefits on the interest side, but HOA and Mello-Roos, and insurance are like throwing money into a hole, unless you really want to live there. But to suggest that a comparison between a rental payment and only the mortgage portion of the cost of ownership being EQUAL is not accurate. MLS data on rentals is more unreliable than for sales. And to exclude TIC rentals is simply missing the point. Housing prices in Irvine are being artifically inflated (yes, another balloon) because of control of the market to an extent that exists nowhere else simply because TIC owns 39,000 apartments in Irvine alone. They are inflating their own bubble in order to continue to inflate the value of their land, retail investments, commercial investments, etc.

    1. IrvineRenter

      Perhaps you are right, but it is the best methodology I could develop with the data available. Plus, it matches what we have been seeing on daily posts for the last few months. Most of the properties I profile are selling at or below rental parity.

  5. Carl Pham

    You may be wrong about that rental figure. This is a big house, so you’d be looking for a family rental — and the house is right next to the drug-dealer’s park. I sure wouldn’t rent it for $1800. There’s a good reason properties over there are now like $100k less than properties on the other side of the railroad, or the other side of Yale.

    1. IrvineRenter

      If you can find a 3 bedroom single-family detached home anywhere in Irvine for under $2,000, please provide the link. I can’t locate one on Craigslist or on the MLS. Even the Irvine Company’s three bedroom apartments rent for more than $2,000.

      1. Tony

        good question. There’s a park near the house but it’s always the usual Irvine stuff: basketball, barbecue…etc. A detached SFR house in this part of Irvine will rent for at least $2,200 a month. It’s hard to find even a 3-bedroom condo for less than $1,900.

        I think that Carl Pham guy is spreading rumors and only he knows why.

Comments are closed.