This week starts a showdown on mortgage-lending rules. How strong the protections will be for consumers will depend upon how successful lenders are at softening the rules proposed by Congress.
Irvine Home Address … 67 WATERSPOUT Irvine, CA 92620
Resale Home Price …… $750,000
We are young, heartache to heartache we stand
NO PROMISES, NO DEMANDS
Love Is A Battlefield
We are strong, no one can tell us we're wrong
Searchin' our hearts for so long, both of us knowing
Love Is A Battlefield
Pat Benatar — Love is a Battlefield
This week starts a showdown on mortgage-lending rules. How strong the protections will be for consumers will depend upon how successful lenders are at softening the rules proposed by Congress. Up for grabs are rules for: loan repayment; appraisals; how much skin lenders must have in the game; and suing a lender for fraud or poorly underwritten mortgages.
Most of these rules ultimately will affect the cost of mortgages and the types of mortgages pushed by lenders. One of the key rules that mortgage lenders want to soften is the rule requiring lenders to hold a 5 percent stake in loans that are bundled and sold with other loans. Those bundles are the mortgage-backed securities that imploded and caused the financial disaster.
By requiring lenders to hold a stake, Congress believes that they will be more cautious about their underwriting. When lenders had no skin in the game they were very careless with their underwriting, allowing "liar loans" and other exotic types of mortgages that are now the most likely to default.Some lenders worry that these stricter rules will make mortgages more expensive for consumers, especially loans with terms other than 30-year conforming fixed-rate mortgages. But consumer groups support "encouraging the market" to choose to sell those safer products, according to Barry Zigas, director of housing and credit policy for the Consumer Federation of America. He thinks these rules are "very important and reasonable" to prevent a repeat of the "economic disaster" we all just experienced. Sounds like the right way to go. Hopefully lenders will not be able to soften these rules during the process of reconciling the bills between the House and Senate this week.
Under these new rules you will need to push more paper to get a mortgage, but it probably won't be much different than what we are seeing in today's very cautious mortgage market. Banks may become even more diligent about collecting the documents that prove your income. Self-employed people without two years of provable business income likely will find it nearly impossible to get a mortgage under the new rules.
Another major rule lenders would like to change involves how lenders are compensated. Under the new rules, lenders no longer can pay commissions based on the rate or type of loan you choose. This form of compensation encouraged mortgage brokers to steer people into higher interest loans or more risky loans for which brokers received better compensation. This change is critical to protect all consumers. It would be a travesty if lenders kill this new provision this week.
The good news with the new law: The burden of proof would shift from the consumer to the provider of mortgage services, to prove that the fees they charge are justified. Under the old law, the consumer had to prove that the fees were not justified. This change will make it much easier for consumers to shop and compare mortgage loans.
Mortgage lenders will be limited in their ability to charge fees if you refinance or pay off your loan early. Also, lenders would have to prove that it was in your best interest to refinance. They won't be able to push you into a new loan just because they will benefit from new fees or get a great commission.
Another key provision that lenders hope to kill is the ability to sue your lender under certain circumstances. Right now, lenders want to delete or revise language that will allow borrowers to to sue lenders for violations of underwriting standards. The law as now written will allow you to sue your lender or mortgage investor if you can prove the loan was written fraudulently or poorly underwritten. Some in the industry say this will make mortgage investing too risky.
One other key issue up for grabs is the rules on appraisals. Real estate agents and brokers want changes in the current rules on ordering appraisals. These new rules were established after the mortgage market collapsed because there was so much evidence of game-playing in the appraisal marketplace. But real estate professionals say the rules have gone too far, and too often an appraiser is assigned who does not understand the local real estate market.
In this case, I hope something is done to correct this problem. I live in one of those types of developments where the homes inside the development are upscale and very different from the surrounding neighborhoods. Many home sales have fallen apart because appraisals came in well below true market value when they were done by appraisers who were based hundreds of miles away from my community and didn't understand neighborhood differences. Some tweaking is definitely needed to improve the current appraisal mess.
- The owner of today's featured property paid $848,000 on 10/28/2005. She used a $650,000 first mortgage, a $113,050 HELOC, and a $84,950 down payment.
- On 1/3/2007 she obtained a HELOC for $135,000 from Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, and on 1/18/2007 she got a HELOC from IndyMac for $196,000. The timing of those two HELOCs looks suspiciously like parallel processing and mortgage fraud. Both loans are delinquent.
- Total property debt is $981,000
- Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $217,950.
- Total squatting time is at least 17 months.
Recording Date: 07/07/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale
Recording Date: 03/26/2009
Document Type: Notice of Default
I don't know if both of those final HELOCs was fully funded and outstanding, but the timing looks suspicious. It is possible that she changed her mind on the first HELOC and only used the one from IndyMac, but I rather doubt it.
Irvine Home Address … 67 WATERSPOUT Irvine, CA 92620
Resale Home Price … $750,000
Home Purchase Price … $848,000
Home Purchase Date …. 10/28/2005
Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(143,000)
Percent Change ………. -16.9%
Annual Appreciation … -2.6%
Cost of Ownership
$750,000 ………. Asking Price
$150,000 ………. 20% Down Conventional
4.80% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate
$600,000 ………. 30-Year Mortgage
$151,778 ………. Income Requirement
$3,148 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment
$650 ………. Property Tax
$317 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)
$63 ………. Homeowners Insurance
$105 ………. Homeowners Association Fees
$4,282 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays
-$763 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)
-$748 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$275 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)
$94 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
$3,140 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership
Cash Acquisition Demands
$7,500 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%
$7,500 ………. Closing Costs @1%
$6,000 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan
$150,000 ………. Down Payment
$171,000 ………. Total Cash Costs
$48,100 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves
$219,100 ………. Total Savings Needed
Baths: 2 full 1 part baths
Home size: 1,949 sq ft
($385 / sq ft)
Lot Size: 4,000 sq ft
Year Built: 2005
Days on Market: 507
Listing Updated: 40238
MLS Number: S562006
Property Type: Single Family, Residential
According to the listing agent, this listing may be a pre-foreclosure or short sale.
This property is in backup or contingent offer status.
Approved Short Sale!! Best Buy In Woodbury! Home Is Model Perfect! Light, Bright, Airy & Tranquil with Upgrades Galore: Granite Counters, Plantation Shutters, Custom Paint, Romantic Fireplace In Living Room, Cathedral Ceilings, Bamboo Flooring, Security System, Built-In Office, Interior & Exterior Surround Sound. Fabulous Master Bath with Spa Tub & Separate Custom Shower. Home Is Tucked Away in a Quiet Corner of the Community with Great Sunset Views. A Must See!