Monthly Archives: July 2009

In the Neighborhood

What is it worth just to be in the neighborhood? Why do the houses that surround you make so much difference?

15 Cedarlake 60   Irvine, CA 92614  kitchen

Asking Price: $715,000

Address: 15 Cedarlake #60 Irvine, CA 92614

Down on the corner, out in the street,
Willy and the poorboys are playin;
Bring a nickel; tap your feet.

You dont need a penny just to hang around,
But if youve got a nickel, wont you lay your money down?
Over on the corner theres a happy noise.
People come from all around to watch the magic boy.

Down On The Corner — Creedence Clearwater Revival

Why do properties obtain a premium due to the houses around them? When you look at certain properties, comparable properties in other neighborhoods may carry a 25% premium that is reflected both in resale prices and in rental rates. Why is that?

One obvious answer is the perception of the quality of life within the community. This is what makes Irvine so special. The people who live in Irvine all believe in the Irvine story; low crime, beautiful surroundings, warm community, abundant conveniences, and other intangibles you can name. This makes Irvine attractive to high wage earners, and it makes properties in Irvine carry a premium relative to similar properties in surrounding communities (see Open Thread 7-11-2009 for an example).

Even within Irvine, there are Villages that command premiums over other villages. There are identical floorplans found in many of the Villages of Irvine, but they consistently show differences in rents and resale prices. This reflects a consumer preference for certain Villages that can be measured as premiums (sorry, I don’t have a good data analysis for you yet). This premium is understandable because some villages have a better location and access, differences in landscaping and monumentation, and of course, differences in “trendiness” and the “cool” factor.

Where it gets more difficult to identify and understand is when you get down to the level of the neighborhood. For instance, today’s featured property is very nice, but when you consider it is a duplex with no view and a tiny yard, what makes it so much more valuable than similar properties? It has to be the neighborhood. If you look back at the price history, this property has carried a 25% premium to the median throughout its existence. What is the advantage of being “in the neighborhood?”

I am always most struck by neighborhood premiums when I see pricing in beachfront neighborhoods. The properties right on the water are going to carry a premium because they are very rare and special, but why does the property across the street — the one with no view, no yard and no parking cost much more than a comparable property inland? The ocean air and climate is part of it, but many homes seem to command premiums far in excess of their use or utility. Is proximity to premium a premium itself?

How much of the premium in neighborhoods like this are the result of “keeping up with the Joneses?” Do people overpay for properties like this so they can be close to the really wealthy people who own on the water? Does it raise their status to be near others with status?

Some of these neighborhood premiums are easier to quantify than to explain. In the end, it really doesn’t matter because both rents and resale prices are effected, so the relationship to rental parity is the same. It is fun to speculate on why some neighborhoods are more desirable than others. What is your theory?

15 Cedarlake 60   Irvine, CA 92614  kitchen

Asking Price: $715,000

Income Requirement: $178,750

Downpayment Needed: $143,000

Purchase Price: $795,000

Purchase Date: 5/27/2005

Address: 15 Cedarlake #60 Irvine, CA 92614

Beds: 3
Baths: 3
Sq. Ft.: 2,194
$/Sq. Ft.: $326
Lot Size: 4,000

Sq. Ft.

Property Type: Condominium
Style: Traditional
Stories: 2
Floor: 1
View: Greenbelt
Year Built: 1984
Community: Woodbridge
County: Orange
MLS#: S581448
Source: SoCalMLS
Status: Active
On Redfin: 6 days

Turkey NOT A SHORT SALE OR FORECLOSURE! South Lake showcase home just steps to
lake, beach club, pool/spa. Completely renovated last year with $60k of
upgrades. Absolutely turnkey with new hardwood floors, new windows and
skylight, shutters and custom built-ins throughout, even in garage.
Huge master suite with retreat and walk-in closet. This model very
rarely comes up and there is nothing like it now on the market in
Woodbridge. It’s priced below recent comparable for a quick sale. Move
your family in for the new school year. This home will not last!

It looks like this property was purchased as an investment on 5/27/2005 for $795,000. The out-of-town owner used a $596,450 first mortgage and a $198,550 downpayment. If he gets his asking price, and if a 6% commission is paid, he will recover $75,650 of his downpayment.

Is this a fear listing? Is he selling out of fear before he goes underwater? He has reason to fear….

Rental Parity and Beyond

What is Rental Parity? What features or characteristics create value above rental cashflow value?

34 Coldbrook   Irvine, CA 92604  kitchen

Asking Price: $1,425,000

Address: 34 Coldbrook Irvine, CA 92604

{book1}

I’m solid gold
I’ve got the goods
They stand when I walk
Through the neighborhoods

Makin’ It — David Naughton

The concept of Rental Parity is often discussed on this blog, but to date, I have never devoted a post to defining it and explaining it before today.

I first discussed Rental Parity in How Inflated are House Prices?, and later I added Rent Versus Own to explore the cost of ownership and relate it to the cost of rental. Finally, I added a subjective refinement to the rental parity basis in I Will Not Call a Bottom.

What is Rental Parity?

Rental Parity is a mathematical relationship between rental rates and property values where rent is equal to the monthly cost of ownership. There are many assumptions and variables that impact Rental Parity — so many that it takes a spreadsheet to try to explain it. (We have a calculator that provides the total cost of ownership on a monthly basis to compare
to the cost of renting. What is perhaps more useful to buyers is the
ability to run the calculation in reverse — If you know what you spend
on rent, you can estimate how much house you can afford.)

The fluid relationship between rents and prices provides a conceptual understanding of value. Rental rates establish where property values should be. Rental Parity is a balance point where there is no financial advantage to choosing renting or owning; a point of theoretical indifference.

If we had a group of theoretically indifferent people who always acted rationally based on perfect information, prices would always be at Rental Parity; any price below rental parity would be perceived a bargain and bid upward, and any price above rental parity would be perceived as too high, and there would be no bid interest. Of course, we all know that people are not indifferent; in fact, they can become very emotional about buying and selling real estate. When they participate in a market, they get caught up with the herd and move prices without regard to fundamentals; short-term price movements become accepted as the market’s long-term trajectory. Trees really can grow to the sky.

Rental parity becomes a baseline — a fundamental. Prices are loosely tethered and may depart for long periods, but prices always manage to return to rental parity in time because as a logical point of indifference; it is the natural resting point for a market purged of kool aid intoxication.

Rents Capture Premiums

Rental Parity provides a useful measure of desirability and premium. When people are deciding between renting and owning and comparing costs (you all do that now, right?), some will chose to rent and some will chose to buy. Both parties are going to take a portion of their income and go obtain housing in their own way. Neighborhoods with high rents will have high home prices, and neighborhoods with high home prices will have high rents. The intrinsic desirability will be mirrored in the rental and for sale markets.

Applying Rental Parity

Rental Parity is a guideline for value, but this number can be refined to adjust for some of the intangibles of ownership — good and bad.

Each property is evaluated to determine its
desirability as a long-term residence — this is an opinion; it is not a mathematically provable. If
the best properties in the entire market would rank a 1, and if the
very worst would rank as a 5.
The little green dot represents a subjective evaluation of a property.

The black dots represent different important price points every
buyer should be aware of. The first is the “value,” if you want to call
it that, of comparable sales in the market. This has nothing to do with
cashflow, and it is based totally on what people are currently paying
for similar properties in the market. The
Comparable Sales Value floats up and down this chart based on whatever
people are currently paying.

The next black dot on the list is the asking price. This can also be
just about anywhere. The frequent WTF listing prices I profile here
would be off the top of the chart. Some short sales are priced well below comps to attract attention.

The next black dot on the list is the Maximum Cashflow value of the property. Do you remember the post, Investment Value of Residential Real Estate?
As I described in that post, there is a legitimate
financial reason to pay more than rental parity for blue-chip
properties a buyer plans to own for 10 years or more. This is not a
large premium over rental parity. The calculations in that post
demonstrate you can pay up to 10% more than rental parity on a
long-term hold because you obtain the benefit of the inflation hedge.
This is not a price point for homes you know you will want to move up
and out of in a few years.

The next black dot on the list is Rental Parity.

The zone between rental parity and cashflow investor levels is the
gray area where all the less desirable properties fall. This would
include most condos, any two-bedroom properties and what are commonly
known as “starter homes.”

The final black dot is the cashflow investor level. This is the
price point where an investor can acquire a property, rent it out, and
turn a monthly profit from owning the property. This is the bottom of
the line for Irvine properties, and it is usually about 25% below
rental parity.

The final number on the chart would be those properties nobody wants
to live in. Does everyone remember Dr. Housing Bubble’s series Real Homes of Genius? Those are the properties I am talking about. What they really need is a bulldozer.

Moving Beyond Rental Parity

Are their influences on the prices of homes beyond income and rent? Are there properties, neighborhoods or communities where money is stored like a reservoir, and values are sustained at levels not justified by incomes?

I have been contemplating the disparity between home prices and incomes in areas like Malibu to see if there really is something that makes certain neighborhoods or certain properties conform to a different set of rules.

In areas like Malibu where there are many cash buyers, prices are determined more by the wealth of a few than the income of the many. Any times you get truly unique properties of very high quality, and the people competing to own them are not wage earners, they are people of great wealth who see something they want. They are bidding on percentages of their net worth rather than percentages of wage income.

When the disparity of wealth sees a shift toward wealth concentration (our recent governmental policies have favored wealth concentration), special properties in a place like Malibu get bid up to very high prices. The prices go so high because the people bidding have very large fortunes. For some of these people, a $20,000,000 house is a small fraction of their holdings.

The implication is that real estate in places like Malibu will be subject to fluctuations in the general pool of wealth in society. Since deflation has ravaged people’s investments, real estate will likely fall in equal measure.

That is all very interesting for Malibu, but Irvine is a working-class city where property values are largely determined by income. Is there any stored wealth in real estate here?

Uniqueness and Quality

There are only two things that creates the capacity to hold wealth beyond cashflow value in real estate; uniqueness and quality. To illustrate the value-adding feature of uniqueness, I thought I would share with you a great scene from an episode of Star Trek The Next Generation. Commander Data, a one-of-a-kind android, has been taken hostage by a wealthy collector who is obsessed with unique objects.

Clip is 5:00 in the video, or click the link below; it is at the right starting point.

The Most Toys — Star Trek The Next Generation

Uniqueness adds value. Wealthy people will compete with one another to obtain unique items, and they are not subject to pressures of financing. When you enter the realm of unique properties, you abandon ideas of Rental Parity.

If something is unique, substitutes are limited. An architect designed mansion on the beach is completely unique, and there is a limited number of comparable properties. When you see properties like the Hearst Castle, there simply are no comparables. In Irvine, there are few unique properties; most properties have many close comparables. Many floorplans are duplicated around town, and properties with comparable sizes and configurations are everywhere. Most of Irvine is an undifferentiated mass.

Quality adds value. Donald Trump, whatever you may think of the man, always strived to create the highest possible quality in his product, even if the pricetag was beyond ridiculous. Most people think pergraniteel is adding quality; it isn’t. Pergo wood flooring is imitation wood, and nothing of quality stands in imitation. Quality is not cheap. Most attempts at quality end up as over-improvements and return less value than cost. There are some very high quality, unique properties in Irvine, mostly in Shady Canyon because it is the only neighborhood where lots are big enough to create unique estates.

Reservoir of Value

Real estate can be a reservoir of value. When properties are unique and of very high quality, the wealthy become interested in possessing them, and prices become based on wealth rather than income. These properties are few and far between. Irvine is not a community where homes will be a tool of the wealthy. Our real estate is simply not that unique, and it is generally not at exceptional levels of quality. That doesn’t mean individuals in Irvine do not store wealth in real estate. Anyone who pays down their mortgage and enjoys appreciation from wage growth can accrue a substantial nestegg. The value of that nestegg in Irvine will always be determined by local wages not by the buying and selling of the very wealthy.

34 Coldbrook   Irvine, CA 92604  kitchen

Asking Price: $1,425,000

Income Requirement: $356,250

Downpayment Needed: $285,000

Purchase Price: $875,000

Purchase Date: 7/14/2000

Address: 34 Coldbrook Irvine, CA 92604

Beds: 4
Baths: 3
Sq. Ft.: 3,400
$/Sq. Ft.: $419
Lot Size: 7,210

Sq. Ft.

Property Type: Single Family Residence
Style: Traditional
Stories: 2
View: Hills, Lake, Mountain
Year Built: 1979
Community: Woodbridge
County: Orange
MLS#: S581546
Source: SoCalMLS
Status: Active
On Redfin: 5 days

Picture yourself hosting friends and family in this beautiful, large
home with views of the Woodbridge North Lake from almost every room.
Entertainer’s back yard with pool, spa and expansive wood and concrete
decks. Roomy master suite with vaulted ceilings, sitting area and
balcony overlooking the pool. Beautifully appointed formal living and
dining rooms with hardwood floors and fireplace with custom mantle.
Expanded kitchen with breakfast nook and counter. Huge upstairs bonus
room with brick fireplace. Downstairs bedroom/office with adjacent 3/4
bathroom. Large laundry room with sink. Crown molding, updated doors,
windows and baseboards. Intercoms in most rooms. Many parts of home are
wired for audio from the entertainment center. Inside the loop location
just steps from lake, tennis club and swimming lagoon. Walking distance
to elementary, middle and high schools. *** No Mello Roos / Low HOA
dues ***

This must be the most entertaining property in Irvine.

Today’s featured property is very desirable. Finishes have been upgraded to the pergraniteel level, it has a private pool, and there is a view of the lake — albeit sideways. There are fewer substitutes for this property because of some unique features, but there are also some substitute houses that are superior (how about the homes right on the water?) It’s cashflow value is probably around $1,000,000. Is there $425,000 in uniqueness and quality here? Is the $1,425,000 price justified?

Open Thread 7-18-2009

Welcome to the weekend open thread.

I was directed to a realtor in Malibu who has been telling the truth about his local market, Rick Wallace.
I don’t know him, and I have no business relationship with him, and
this post is not compensated. He has written some good stuff, so I
thought I would share it with you.

Rick Wallace: Malibu’s Expert Realtor

The listing below is not one of his.

31634 SEA LEVEL Dr   MALIBU, CA 90265  entry

Asking Price: $9,295,000

Address: 31634 SEA LEVEL Dr MALIBU, CA 90265

I have Mr. Wallace’s permission to share some of his excellent work:

Real Estate Revolves Around Time and Money

Time is money. Money can buy time. In virtually every activity of our day, the choices we make involve a consideration of the cost in time and the cost in money.

The real estate market is founded on these two assets. In fact, all statistics to measure the marketplace involve those principles. During 2007, over the course of 12 months, for example, the median price of a home sale in Malibu was about $3 million. A measure of money over time.

Every individual makes decisions regarding real estate that involve the weight of time and money. That includes many who do not invest or ever buy a home. They are making a decision that the money they have, at least at that time, is not enough to purchase the asset they wish. Instead, they rent, and pay money to a landlord over time.

In negotiations, the weight of time and money is everything. The result of a negotiation, including one that ends with no deal, is the result of the two parties, separately and privately, measuring their time and money threshold and positioning themselves accordingly. A buyer can take their time to decide when to spend the money they have available, which is always in a state of flux, as long as, over time, the values are not moving away from their capability. If a buyer suddenly has extra funds, that may accelerate the moment of decision to pounce on the house or condo they desire.

Most interesting is the behavior of sellers in the real estate market, something I have been studying for my 21 years in the business. My final conclusion is that half the time sellers behave in a smart way. Half the time they are just plain stupid.

Of course, sellers do not know what is going to happen in the future. Nevertheless, the one universal truth of a person or party selling a home is they believe that time will probably work in their favor to bring the most money they can receive. Everyone believes that at first. But it is not always true. In good markets, it makes sense. When the prevailing trend is that the value of property is increasing, a person selling is confident that over more time, more money can be gained. More time equals more money.

When, then, does that person ever sell at all? The obvious reason, that they determine separately and privately, is that they do not have the luxury of time to wait. They need or want to sell soon for whatever private reason they may have – a job change, wanting to scale down, anxious to move to a different lifestyle. In the end, time is such a valuable asset; it trumps the potential of waiting for more money. It is an underrated and undervalued aspect of negotiation. Often, time is more valuable than money.

Hundreds of times, I have seen sellers sell a home for much less money than they should’ve. Or less than they COULD HAVE! How does that happen? It is because for much of the time, money is more important to them. Then, they change their value choice to a preference of time. This is the frequent behavior of a person who puts their house on the market at a ridiculous price, whether by ego, or stupidity or just mere wishing, and when it does not sell over a long time, suddenly they need or want to sell more badly.

The best deals a buyer can make are often from a seller that started too high in price and has lasted on the market a long time. To make up for lost time, that seller may give up the most money in the end. It is a quirky but inevitable fate. The cost of asking too much, unbeknownst to many sellers, is that they grow exhausted over time and their passion for money disappears in the end.

Sellers, before hitting the market, should make a decision of what is important to them, time or money. In the current market, which is clearly demonstrating lowering prices, many sellers HAVE TIME and do not need or particularly want to sell. They won’t, most assuredly. The money is more important and since they will not get the money they desire, they will make use of the time. Other sellers are in the opposite situation. They do not have time. And the longer they take, the less money they will get anyway. In a market like this, as I have advised my clients, the money you get NOW, no matter how disappointing it is, is still better than taking any more TIME, particularly if time is not a luxury. The money later will only be less and time will be lost.

{book2}

Gap widens between number of homes listed vs. homes sold

Realty in Malibu Ignores Reality

Many thousands of people would love to own a Malibu home. Hundreds inquire about the possibility every month. The sideline is packed full of wishful buyers. Malibu is the dream of multitudes who crave beauty, recreation and a small-town feeling for their lives, as well as the ultimate reward for accomplishment. Yet, in 2008, only about two homes per week sold here.

Despite the deep romantic chemistry between the public and our town, the transitive property of equality (if A = B, and B = C, then A = C) is ignored by many Malibu homeowners.

“A” is a real estate market that statewide and in the Los Angeles region has seen values drop more than 40 percent. “B” is the historically proven notion that realty trends in the region similarly occur in Malibu. “C” follows that Malibu is experiencing a 40 percent drop in real estate values, or more. Our town, however, has been in a long period of denial. The assumption of insulation from the market has been dominant. Many listings still come on the market at higher prices than were recently paid for the same house, as if a profit is still expected in this economy. Other listings sit for months with no offers.

The result: almost no marketplace at all; very few sales; a Malibu real estate industry with barely a pulse.

It is true that the lending and home value collapse had a delayed effect on Malibu, as well as on other high-end areas of Los Angeles. Now, however, every price range, including the revered upper-end, is suffering from a harsh lack of willing and able buyers. The discrepancy between the number of active buyers and sellers is large. Many in the industry and the town seem unwilling to face it.

I believe Malibu risks a much greater value decline than necessary unless price stabilization occurs sooner than later. Just as the individual who starts with an aggressively high asking price is often the most motivated seller later on, settling for a much lower than anticipated price, our market as a whole risks a greater decline in the long run because reality is disregarded in the short run.

Only 100 homes sold last year? This is more challenging than any market of the 1990s when we had a prolonged housing slump. Last year was probably the worst year for sales in Malibu history, with only about 2.5 percent of existing homes transacting. Yet many listings are currently priced as though year 2004 appreciation is still in effect when, really, a 2004 sales price now might be fortunate.

The marketplace requires that either a buyer have a good amount of cash, is taking a profit out of their recent home sale, or can get a large loan. All three sources are limited. Investment portfolios are diminishing, home equities have narrowed or been eliminated, and lending market requirements are anything but relaxed.

While banks are operating with the right hand making it thorny for anyone to get a loan, the left hand takes back more properties lost by sellers because buyers cannot get a loan. Only when prices are so low that lenders feel little risk left from the market will they go back to taking chances with borrowers.

That means that competitive pricing is vital. Before a real estate recovery can occur, let alone rising prices, some equilibrium needs to be established. Sales and value data need to be in place. Buyers and sellers (and Realtors) need to be working from some knowledge base. Our community lacks that simple guide at this time.

Individuals can never be expected to put their needs behind those of the community, but this is a time the stars are aligned. All of Malibu will benefit from smart sellers. The best advice now, I believe, is the same as during the past 18 months: “Mr. and Mrs. Homeowner, with values heading downward, you are better off selling sooner than later. And if you don’t need to sell, you are not getting any offers and you decide not to lower your price, it is probably not the right time to be competing in the already saturated market. Unless you’re willing to price your home with the growing number of short sale and foreclosure sale prices (the prices most buyers are watching), just sit back a few years and enjoy your lovely Malibu home.”

Prices are easily forecast for the next six to 12 months, if supply and demand trends are clear. In Malibu, when the annualized sales projection is equal to the current inventory of homes for sale, prices likely remain flat. In good times, yearly sales totals were in the 300s and the inventory was only about 150 homes for sale; prices were going skyward. But now, with a pace of 100 projected homes selling annually and 200 to 250 on the market, prices are guaranteed to keep going down. With the current discrepancy, it may be a steep drop.

Sellers have a choice of burying their heads in the 2006 sands, taking a 2002-2004 number now or looking at a lower, year-2000 price down the road. I hope Malibu’s retreat on the calendar is as brief as possible. Clarity of the market environment may help.

Conversely, Malibu in good cycles has grown in value exponentially better than the rest of the state. To illustrate, in 1972 the median value of a home in Malibu was twice that of the state. By 1990, it was three times greater. By 1997, it had gone up to four times the state median; recent years, five to six times. While prospects for the long term are fabulous for Malibu investors, at the moment the median asking price in Malibu is 14 times the state median sale price. I feel it is out of sync with reality.

Malibu real estate will always be the best that can be found, but this is a time to be cutting losses, not attempting gains. Malibu is not immune from the rest of the world; pricing needs to adapt to conditions. Those who realize this soonest will be rewarded, as will all of Malibu.

31634 SEA LEVEL Dr   MALIBU, CA 90265  entry

Asking Price: $9,295,000

Address: 31634 SEA LEVEL Dr MALIBU, CA 90265

Beds: 4
Baths: 4
Sq. Ft.: 3,035
$/Sq. Ft.: $3,063
Lot Size:
Property Type: Single Family Residential
Community: Malibu Beach
County: Los Angeles
MLS#: 09-349943
Source: TheMLS
Status: Active
On Redfin: 147 days

A brand new architectural showcase located on the beach on a desirable
gated street in Broad Beach area of Malibu. This ultra chic David Gray
designed masterpiece features four bedrooms, cement floors and
finishes, bi-fold doors opening to the ocean, walls of framed glass,
two fireplaces and impressive architectural details throughout. This is
truly the definition of “home as art”. Also for lease @$50,000/MO.

Well, if you can lease it for $50,000 and buy it for $9,295,000, the GRM is 185.9. That actually puts this property at rental parity — assuming someone would underwrite a $7,000,000 loan.

Date Event Price
Jun 17, 2009 Price Changed $9,295,000
May 30, 2009 Price Changed $9,950,000
May 06, 2009 Price Changed $10,750,000
Apr 08, 2009 Price Changed $12,500,000
Feb 21, 2009 Listed $15,000,000

Properties like this and in many special neighborhoods, the traditional math of cashflow valuation breaks down. Next week I am going to explore the reasons for this.

An Open Invitation to The Irvine Company

This is an open invitation to representatives of the Irvine Company to come to the IHB. We want you to be part of our community.

Smiley Face

We know you guys read the blog and the forums, and some of you even participate without revealing who you are. It is time the elephant quit hiding in the room. Come out and join us.

Your customers want to know you. They want to know what you are doing and why you are doing it. It affects your customers; it affects us.

We are your customers. We buy your houses, rent your apartments and shop at your shopping centers. When you set out to create a great community, you did it for us. We know what we like and what we don’t like, and here we talk about it.

This is an opportunity for you. Come to the blog and our forums and participate. Identify yourselves as who you are. Don’t try to disguise that you may have a bias or you will eventually get caught and it will be worse. If you speak the truth with authenticity, people will accept that you may be biased, but your information is good and truthful. People are here for good information.

We talk about what you do, and we speculate because we have no other sources of information. If you are not participating in our conversations, or if we do not know who you are, you cannot correct bad information when it gets presented. It is one thing to be damned for who you are, but it is another to be damned for who you are not. Talk to us. Give us good information, and we will be a happier community.

We also provide you a great mechanism for getting feedback directly from your customers and your potential customers. You can go pay for market data and studies, or you could ask questions directly to your customers for free in our forums. People will respond. Sometimes we get so bored that we start silly threads that are the online version of chit chat. If you give us something to talk about, it will be welcomed.

I am sincere in this invitation. No tricks. No agenda. Just an invitation for you to come join our community and make it better.

I also invite each member of our community to be open to anyone from The Irvine Company who identifies themselves on the blog or the forums. Call the BS, but embrace the truth.

If you want to contact us. I can be reached at irvinerenter@irvinehousingblog.com and Zovall can be reached at zovall@irvinehousingblog.com. We look forward to hearing from you.

Money Maker?

By 2004, the primary reason people bought homes was to make a profit. A home was a money maker that gave you shelter. What a deal.

52 Winding Way   Irvine, CA 92620  kitchen

Asking Price: $1,199,000

Address: 52 Winding Way Irvine, CA 92620

{book}

Shake your money maker
Like somebody boutta pay you
Don’t worry about them haters
Keep your nose up in the air
You know I got it
If you want it, come get it
Stand next to this money

Money Maker — Ludacris

Real estate is a money maker. Don’t listen to those haters at the IHB. BUY NOW!!!

In the past couple of weeks, we have had a couple of new posters
from beach communities remind us of how much kool aid is still in the
market. The Irvine bulls have been quiet for a while now, and although
the used house salesmen are calling the bottom, we all know prices have
not bottomed yet. As long as interest rates are artifically low,
unemployment is very high, and default rates continue to set new
records, there isn’t much chance of prices stabilizing.

The last bastions of kool aid denial are the beach communities.
Perhaps prices there will defy the downward pull of nearby communities.
Perhaps not. Personally, I think prices there are going to crash very, very hard. We will see.

There is a legitimate financial reason to buy a home: it saves you money versus renting. I have written often about rental parity and waiting to buy when it is cheaper to own than to rent. We are seeing this in neighborhoods all around Orange County, largely due to the artificial affordability in the form of 5% interest rates orchestrated by the Federal Reserve.

However, the primary financial reason people in California buy homes has nothing to do with rental parity or saving money; it is all about speculating on appreciation. Perhaps the collapse of real estate prices and the resulting foreclosures and bankruptcies will change people’s attitudes. With the strength of the kool aid in California, it will take a long and painful collapse to change people’s minds. (For anyone who needs a refresher on the difference between cashflow investment and speculation on appreciation, please read Speculation or Investment?)

52 Winding Way   Irvine, CA 92620  kitchen

Asking Price: $1,199,000

Income Requirement: $299,750

Downpayment Needed: $239,800

Purchase Price: $1,545,000

Purchase Date: 6/21/2006

Address: 52 Winding Way Irvine, CA 92620

Beds: 4
Baths: 5
Sq. Ft.: 3,477
$/Sq. Ft.: $345
Lot Size: 5,717

Sq. Ft.

Property Type: Single Family Residence
Style: Tuscan
Stories: 2
Floor: 1
View: Park or Green Belt
Year Built: 2006
Community: Woodbury
County: Orange
MLS#: S580793
Source: SoCalMLS
Status: Active
On Redfin: 3 days

STUNNINGLY BEAUTIFUL home: reflects a bit of Hawaiian Style with a
relaxed elegance. Rich hardwood flooring, custom painting tastefully
done, a mixture of plantation shutters and vertical blinds, crown
molding throughout. LARGE GUEST SUITE ON FIRST FLOOR, suitable as a
second master bedroom. Every bedroom has its own full bath. SUMPTOUS
MASTER BEDROOM AND BATH. Double sink vanities with limestone counters ,
polished stone flooring, travertine shower stall with custom tile.
Media niche in master bedroom. UPSTAIRS MEDIA CENTER AND SECOND FAMILY
ROOM. Custom built-in cabinet center holds a large flat panel TV.
EXTRAORDINARY BACK YARD: AN OUTDOOR KITCHEN: large covered grill,
double burners, storage, icemaker, FRIG. supports two umbrellas, a bit
of BBQ Heaven. TWO KITCHENS: INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. Across from one of
Woodbury’s beautiful private parks with pools and a tot lot.

Stunning!!!

Intermittent CAPS LOCK

What? Two kitchens, and neither of them is gourmet?

These are the kind of owners I feel bad for. They purchased right at the peak on 6/21/2006 for $1,545,000. They used a $1,235,700 first mortgage and a $309,300 downpayment. They did not use conventional financing, and I imagine they cannot afford the payment on anything other than the ARM they used. Now that they cannot refinance and the market has gone south, they are being compelled to sell at a loss. If this property sells for its current asking price — 22% off — and if a 6% commission is paid, the total loss on the property will be $417,940. Their $309,300 downpayment is lost, and their credit will be trashed.

That sucks.

I hope you have enjoyed this week at the Irvine Housing Blog. Come back next week as we
continue chronicling ‘the seventh circle of real estate hell.’ Have a great weekend.

🙂