Monthly Archives: November 2008

Purple Kool Aid

Purple Kool Aid — Incubus

But then they’re not crazy they’re just high on kool-aid

Evidence of kool aid intoxication can be found in nearly every property I examine. Everyone in the ownership chain began extracting home equity starting in 2000-2001 and continuing up through 2007 when the lenders cut everyone off. Our society in California has become completely dependent upon ever-increasing home prices to permit mortgage equity withdrawal to fuel our economy. This borrowed money flowed into cars, boats, trips, home remodels, and many consumer goods, but it also flowed into business start ups, commercial rents, computers, phone systems, employee salaries and many beneficial uses as well. Unfortunately, none of it was sustainable. It was all built on a Ponzi scheme of debt structures and false insurance which has now come crashing down.

At this point, the residents of California are as addicted as any opium addict. In fact, OPM, or other people’s money, is the drug everyone craves. The conventional wisdom, if there is such a thing, in California right now is that house prices will go up again because demand is high, but people just can’t get loans. There is a certain truth to this as people proved during the bubble that they are kool aid intoxicated enough to take on any loan offered to them; however, the lenders are not going to make these loans available again. Making toxic loans at extreme property valuations is what caused them to lose so much money. The days of lenders enabling this behavior are over.

Today’s featured property shows the pattern of mortgage equity withdrawal and ever-increasing loan balances with previous owners of the property. The final owner was the bagholder who used 100% financing and passed the losses on to the lender (who incidentally is Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac which is now us).

15 Liliano Kitchen

Asking Price: $587,900IrvineRenter

Income Requirement: $146,975

Downpayment Needed: $117,580

Monthly Equity Burn: $4,899

Purchase Price: $775,000

Purchase Date: 4/21/2006

Address: 15 Liliano, Irvine, CA 92614

Beds: 3
Baths: 3
Sq. Ft.: 1,556
$/Sq. Ft.: $378
Lot Size: 3,045

Sq. Ft.

Property Type: Single Family Residence
Style: Mediterranean
Year Built: 1987
Stories: 2 Levels
Area: Westpark
County: Orange
MLS#: P662686
Source: SoCalMLS
Status: Active
On Redfin: 4 days

Bank owned home sold in as-is conditon. All offers should be submitted
with proof of funds and prequal. letter. Home is completely upgraded
from top to Bottom. Granite Countertops in Kitchen and Bathrooms.
Traventine floors , Berber Shag Carpet, Faux Painting. Customer
Fireplace, Inground Spa & Firepit. Custom wrought Iron staircase
railing. Quiet Communnity in Westpark. Close to Malls, Shopping
Centers, Freeways & John Wayne Airport.

The first owner my records show in the chain of ownership purchased on 3/20/1996 for $224,000. The owners used a $179,200 first mortgage and a $44,800 downpayment. This was typical at the time. In 1998, they refinanced for $182,000, and in 2001, they opened a $23,000 HELOC. When they sold the property, they had more debt than when they started.

The second owner purchased on 4/3/2002 for $395,000. She used a $315,500 first mortgage, a $40,000 second mortgage, a $40,000 HELOC, and a $10,000 downpayment. As you can see, downpayment requirements were already dropping by 2002. This owner sold in less than one year.

The third owner purchased on 1/29/2003 for $457,500. He used a $366,000 first mortgage, a $91,500 second mortgage, and a $0 downpayment. It is early 2003, and downpayments are already a thing of the past. About a year later, the owner refinanced for $445,000, and opened a HELOC for $35,000 taking out $22,500 in spending money.

The fourth owner purchased on 4/21/2006 for $775,000. She used a $620,000 first mortgage, a $155,000 second mortgage, and a $0 downpayment. Since this was the peak of the market, she let the property go into foreclosure, and it was auctioned for $634,800 on 9/9/2008.

Of the four owners shown in the property records going back to 1996, none of them paid down their mortgages by any amount. Two of the four added to the mortgage, one of the four didn’t own the property long enough to do so, and the final owner never had any equity to withdrawal. These patterns of behavior are very widespread, and deeply engrained into the society. As I have said before, mortgage equity withdrawal was the rule not the exception.

The lender who now owns the property is not even trying to get their money back. If this property sells for its asking price, and if a 6% commission is paid, the total loss on the property will be $222,374. The Fannie/Freddie second mortgage of $155,000 is already gone, and the holder of the first mortgage is going to lose the rest.

This property is being offered for 24% off its peak sale price.

{book}

The purple kool-aid cult is back, I’m paranoid again
Would someone please appease all the stress of my

Sorry friend, there’s no way I can stay
Wish I could explain the reason why
I’m being chased so please pardon my haste
Please appease the stress of my brown head

Four years and as many days float on by
??? carry out that silicone ?? atacious?? left behind
I’m going next door to celebrate I say
??? purple ??? koolaid ??? is the punch that’s got me drunk today

Next thing I know I’m standing on a chair
whipping my arms around the friendly air
I preached the words around a year ago
i now surrender to the certain glow?

The purple kool-aid cult is back, I’m paranoid again
Would someone please appease all the stress of my

Sorry friend, there’s no way I can stay
Wish I could explain the reason why
I’m being chased so please pardon my haste
Please appease the stress of my brown head

Ohhohohohohoh!

I’m being…
I’m being chased by seven kids high on kool-aid
But then they’re not crazy cause they’re high on kool-aid
But then they’re not crazy they’re just high on kool-aid

Purple Kool Aid — Incubus

Open Thread 11-1-2008

Dazed and Confused — Led Zeppelin

The election is coming up in a few days. Has all the bull$hit being thrown around left you dazed and confused? I got a call from Robo-Bill Clinton today. I felt so special. I am planning to sit down with my California General Election voter information guide this weekend and make up my mind on how I plan to vote on the various initiatives. Since the topic of the weekend is politics, I thought it would be good to explore some of the politics of the housing bubble.

There are many ideas floating around the blogosphere regarding what can and should be done about the housing crisis. I have received a couple of emails recently from people with ideas on changes to our current system. One is from a local realtor named Shevy Akason who is championing legislation that would help the flagging housing market and get it on more solid ground (His blog is here). This isn’t a bailout, and although I think there are some issues, it is a proposal worth examining:

The proposed bill adds provisions to the current IRS code that allows for SEP IRA deductions outlined in IRS Publication 560 to be expanded to cover HEA (Home Equity Accounts). The bill will allow prospective homeowners to put money into a designated HEA (Home equity account). This money must be used for the down payment or closing costs on a primary residence. In addition, this legislation will allow current homeowners that have less than 50% equity to place money into an HEA account designated for homes they purchased after January 1, 2000 and before Jan 1, 2009 or 180 days after this legislation takes affect, whichever is later. Finally, it allows current homeowners that participate in this program and remain current on their mortgage to go back as far as 2000 and claim an income tax deduction on any money paid toward the principle of their home including their original down payment. To participate in this program homeowner must be in or re-finance into a fully amortized fixed rate 1st mortgage. The legislation should take affect immediately upon passing and be limited to 360 days with options for extensions.

Above is merely the summary. The PDF contains more information. It is an interesting proposal. Personally, I like the idea of a tax advantaged savings account for downpayments. However, I don’t believe expanding our subsidization of real estate through the tax code is a good idea. We already oversubsidize real estate with the home mortgage interest deduction. Encouraging debt in this way is part of the problem. I do like how the proposal encourages saving and paying down mortgage debt. I do think this program would not do much for those on the margins who are likely to go into foreclosure. The problem these people have is too much debt and too little income. To qualify for the program as outlined, people would need to refinance into a fixed-rate mortgage. I like that idea, but very few marginal borrowers can afford to do this, and those who are distressed are underwater and could not obtain fixed-rate financing even if they could afford it. Basically, this proposal would help those who need it least.

The proposal is not a fix for the foreclosure crisis. There is no fix. It does address the problem of saving for a house and the use of exotic financing, and I like that.

I also received an email from MalibuRenter:

As I was looking at your model of the cost of
buying vs renting, I realized the potential of a simple policy change: make the
standard deduction much larger. For example, instead of the current
$10,200, go to $20,000 for a married couple. About 75% of all home
mortgages are for $300k or less (see http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2008/pdf/hmda07draft.pdf , page 53). For someone with a new $300k loan at 6.5% and no other
itemized deductions, they would no longer have to itemize. For people with
a few other itemized deductions like income taxes and property taxes, they
still might take the higher standard deduction with a $200-$250k
loan. That would mean more than half of all mortgageholders would have no
reason to itemize.

This has some nice implications. 1. For
anyone whose itemized deductions including mortgage interest fits under the new
limit, they are no worse off. Usually, they will be better off. Many
more people with modest incomes will not have to keep records or have to
understand the code in order to itemize. It is a way to both reduce and
simplify taxes for people with modest incomes. 2. Paying off your loan
earlier, or starting to pay faster, would not lower your income tax deductions
for people under the $20,000 standard deduction. 3. There would be more
incentive to refinance to lower interest loans, because the Federal Govt would
subsidize less of the interest cost, frequently they would subsidize none of
it. 4. There would be less marginal incentive toward larger
homes, higher loan to value ratios, home equity loans, and cashout refis.
5. In general, homes would be financed with less leverage.

I like the idea. The following was my response:

This would also make interest-only loans less appetizing because you
would get less bang for the buck. It would certainly be more
politically feasible than trying to eliminate the HMID. I wonder, would this create a tipping point where you would have
incentive to jack up your mortgage. Once you crossed the threshold, the
larger your deduction the better. I suppose you could always lower the
cap as well. You could make the window of opportunity to benefit from
the HMID so small that only a small band of middle to upper income
homeowners get any benefit. Also, for our new Democratic president and Congress, raising the
personal exemption lowers the taxes on the most needy and trickles its
way up to the middle class. They would like that.

The Home Mortgage Interest Deduction is a direct government
subsidy of ownership that encourages excessive debt loads. It would be
very difficult to get rid of politically, but since excessive debt was
the primary cause of the house price collapse and huge lender losses,
it is something that should be examined.

{book}

I
have my own proposals for preventing the next housing bubble. The
following is the last chapter of my book The Great Housing Bubble:

When
the new administration comes into office this January, the housing
crisis will be one of the most important issues facing the new
President. There will be many ideas floating around. Some of them good;
most of them bad.

What do you think of these ideas? What do you think should be done?

Been Dazed and Confused for so long it’s not true.
Wanted a woman, never bargained for you.
Lots of people talk and few of them know,
soul of a woman was created below.

You hurt and abuse tellin’ all of your lies.
Run around sweet baby, Lord how they hypnotize.
Sweet little baby, I don’t know where you’ve been.
Gonna love you baby, here I come again.

Every day I work so hard, bringin’ home my hard earned pay
Try to love you baby, but you push me away.
Don’t know where you’re goin’, only know just where you’ve been,
Sweet little baby, I want you again.

Been dazed and confused for so long, it’s not true.
Wanted a woman, never bargained for you.
Take it easy baby, let them say what they will.
Will your tongue wag so much when I send you the bill?

Dazed and Confused — Led Zeppelin