Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- zovall on A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
Recent Posts
- A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
- $499,900 :: 84 Deermont 51, Irvine CA, 92602
Irvine Renter, we totally need to get a graphic for “hardwood”.
Pinocchio with a tent?
O!
LOL! Can you overlay some pergo wood flooring on the ceiling behind him? Then I can put a title: “Hard Wood Flooring”
I like it I like it
Maybe now you understand what I meant by “jpg homies”.
You probably look like that guy in the picture:
“Ooooo… look at this new jpg I made for IR!”
Irvine HO, you just don’t appreciate fine hardwood flooring.
Check out the updated post.
LOL! Mikey I think he likes (loves) it
Sold in 2007 for $525K.
According to irvine renter current market value is only 5% off peak for this strategic location - LOL.
But low and behold they are asking 10% over 2007 price.
Let’s see where this closes, the “epic crash” in Irvine continues. It may sell for 5% off peak or the same, maybe 10% more… Report on the devastation quickly.
You may want to update and be more precise with your price per square foot numbers.
Redfin shows an up tick to $355 per sq ft for 92602. For recent comps for this gem it’s showing $361.
The epic Irvine crash continues.
Statics can be used many different ways.
There’s not enough transactions in 92602, but I thought I’d post some numbers to show what’s really going on in that zip code. Per Redfin, 15 SFH’s sold in Feb. Per Redfin SFH medium price is down in this zip code -21.9% vs prior year, and SQFT off -8%.
Redfin also shows that SF home sales in Irvine @ 322 a sqft. Also, they show as of Feb 2011, sales off -6.8% vs previous month (I thought sales were suppose to increase after the new year), and off -10.6% vs previous year. Medium price off -3.3% from previous month, and off -7.7% from previous year.
Let’s wait and see what this sells for, shall we?
It may sell for more than 2008 price. There was a lot of panic at that time, and equity sellers were just wanting to get out. However, this is an awful location for this home ... just incredibly awful.
I think I know what’s going on. We’ve started the second part of the decline, and unless the govt/fed can up the ante with more debt/welfare, prices will continue to drop in Orange County, Irvine and 92602.
Let’s see were comps are at the end of the year, shall we?
“It may sell for more than 2008 price”
Ahhh progress and acceptance, I love it. So who exactly is presenting the wrong data now LOL.
I’m not accepting anything. I don’t have to be right. The numbers speak:
SFH in 92602 fer Redfin:
3/23/2009 = 332 SQFT
3/21/2011 = 327 SQFT
So prices are roughly the same ... this after the govt/fed threw trillions at this mess. Zero percent interest rates. The lowest mortgage rates in history. 2 trillion in quantitative easing. Special tax deductions. Political heat on the banks/lenders. Accounting rules manipulated for the banks. All of it.
The collapse was interrupted by the greatest expansion of debt in recorded history. The real question is, how much longer can this continue? I think it’s ending.
As I said before, let’s see were comps are at the end of the year ... the end of next year too, shall we? I don’t believe the govt/fed can continue this.
No way, let me get this straight: you are using list prices for 2011. Give me a second to laugh.
Sold is $355 per sq ft. What’s more important, sold or list or do you conveniently choose which one you want to use LOL. If this was priced at $540k it would likely already be pending, $361 show for the relevant area. Facts are facts.
You’re right ... I was using condo’s too in my field.
Given the list price this will probably take forever to sell. It may take a year before we know what it closes for and maybe there will be a trustee fip transaction in between unless there was a 20% down payment or more. End of 2007 might have required 20% down. I’d guess it bottoms around $520-525, though the $489 or $470 estimates are not unreasonable. $350 is unreasonable but crazier things have happened.
so one would argue that there has been huge intervention in the market Lee.
But that was done nationally, not only for Irvine. So given that, when the other truly bubbly areas fell by 40% or 50% (ala vegas and Miami), Irvine has held up relatively better.
That isn’t to say that prices may not go down some more but what made Irvine so special that the interventions specifically affected it differently from the other markets.
What?
You mean in Las Vegas there aren’t housing selling in 2011 for greater than their 2007 sales price? Say it ain’t so. Las Vegas must be different.
Strawman argument.
Even IR the Las Vegas flipping tycoon frankly admits that appreciation is not what will drive sales in LV, and in one of his LV posts he talks about deteriorating prices hurting profits on a couple of his properties with squatters.
So don’t try and argue against a position that no one here is taking.
This “strategic location” makes me think of other threads we’ve had about the fun health implications of living next to a major road like Jamboree: http://goo.gl/eEIZp
Here is a question that has perplexed me:
I fully understand why large banks would want to
throttle the shadow inventory sales rate to
keep prices artifically high. (as explained
above)
From what I can tell, the banks are emulating
the Debeers diamond business model. IE. keep
the huge oversupply of diamonds in the vault
and meter them out to create an illusion
of scarcity and force prices high.
What I don’t understand is why small/medium
size banks with limited R/E exposure would
not dump their entire portfolios on the market
to recover as much cash as *quickly* as possible?
In others words, why don’t the small banks
jump off the cliff first and thus maximizing
their total possible return?
Are all the banks linked together as a cartel?
If they are locked together in a cartel or not is as much conspiracy theory and anything else (IMHO).
What I do believe is going on is that the banks do not have the reserves to dump all these properties at the same time. They need the capital coming in from the ZIRP and other bailouts to feed the loses taken as they write off the bad loans.
Also, they only want to scale up the distressed processing operations so much. They are basically feeding a department to lose money. They want to keep that department just big enough to push through the amount of write downs they can afford.
Unless you are in New York. In that case let the guy sitting at the desk next to you live rent and mortgage free. Assholes.
The small banks, if they kept the loans in house, do not have the same percentage of bad residential loans. And they do market their REO quickly.
School Information
* Elementary School: Myford
* Middle School: Pioneer
* High School: Beckman
* School District: Irvine Unified
Beckman is Irvine Unified?
Yeah, tell that to the unsuspecting FCBs.
The FCBs know that West Irvine is Tustin Unified.
And even though, those schools in that area of Tustin Ranch are just as good (if not better) than Irvine Unified.
But the perception of “Tustin” does have some sway on price, West Irvine is typically lower than other areas of Irvine in IUSD proper.
Exactly,
It’s all good as long as the FCB punchbowl remains full.
Maybe someone has suggested this before, but periodically, you should have a “Price is Right” contest on polling for the actual sales price on a recently listed WTF price such as this
Closest to, without going over gets some kudos from you, and on their death bed, they will maintain total consciousness, which is nice….
My bid is 489,900 with a closing date of 8/1/2011
I would guess $525K with a $417K loan, though I could see $540-550K. Hard to know whether they need to sell.
REO, 350k on May 16th, 2013
I’m surprised PR hasn’t rebutted you with his awesome Irvine insight yet.
Chances of this going sub $500k is slim.
I’m with PR and an over/under of $525k due to bad location.
Having lived near a major street before, I would not buy this place for $400k.
Having lived near a major street before, I would not buy this place for $400k.
You wouldn’t do it for the sake of the children getting to go to a fine Irvine school?
Why does the Nar get quoted anymore? Aren’t their numbers suspect by definition?
A few years ago, there was a front page article in the OC Register that had a cool map. It detailed the distressed properties/foreclosure problem by zip code in Orange County. For example, if a zip code had more than 6 months of inventory, it got shaded red. Buried in the article, the writer talked about how he came up with the months of inventory….# of foreclosures + distressed properties divided by the sales per month. I thought, “WTF”. I wrote to the guy and asked what the rates would be if new inventory and existing (non-distressed) properties were factored in. And then I began my plans to sell our house.
Why does the Nar get quoted anymore? Aren’t their numbers suspect by definition?
Of course they are suspect, but who else are the reporters going to ask?
I’ll say short sale of $470K in November of 2011.
boy, boy, boy, prices in a double dip with the fed buying bonds and interest rates at serious artificial lows…. We have a long hard slow grind ahead of us for a decade or more. Prices slowly deflating as rates rise at best. The almighty help us if we get anything other than a slow rise in inflation and rates. Imagine buying any of this with 9% money…. pobre si!
B
We’ll see how things pan out when QE2 ends.
But then there’ll probably be QE3, 4, ..... (and to infinity).
Can’t beat a printing machine, ya know?
If we have a Q3 and more… the dollar is even more doomed. Rates will rise. They are higher now than they were 6 months ago and the fed is buying… If this keeps up the Fed will be the only one buying…
B
Wow… what would happen if rates just went back 7.25% - what I paid in 1999 with perfect credit and 20% down?? Most don’t really realize that rates falling for 20 to 30 years - depending on your definition - also, enabled this ginormous bubble. Now we will likely see a reversal to mean. Not all at once but, slowly. Rates will just rise slowly (if we are lucky) for as long as you can see…. I’m guess a 3-4 point rise in long term rates over the next 10-12 years.
Why do you think gold is going through the roof?? Just like the 70s…stagflation. Rising rates, rising commodities, rising inflation. And, declining values for anything and everything that requires borrowed money.
Yikes… I’m not happy about it. I own property but, also rent a place. Just a very tough decade or two in front of us….
BD
Interest rates will not go to 7% or 9% by magic or because it is the ‘mean’. 10-year rates were very low for much of the 50’s, so we can have today’s low rates for a while. Rates were higher in 1999 even in the face of an improving deficit situation - why? Maybe it is because investment dollars were gushing into stocks? Which also coincided with a very healthy job market?
Rates will rise with two factors: rising inflation and an economy moving closer to full capacity. What could produce higher rates is the fed saying its inflation target is now 4% instead of 2% (it gives more flexibility in the zero-bound situation we are currently in). We had rough 4% inflation in the 90’s and that was a decent decade economically (really, compare it to the 00’s), so 4% inflation would not hurt. If the fed did this, you’d have rates spike 2% higher…but you’d have 2% more inflation, keeping real rates nearly constant. Higher rates, with higher inflation are easier to handle than lower rates with zero or negative inflation.