The fallacy of a painless housing market recovery

Jan 6th, 2011  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by EconE
2011-01-06 04:57 AM

If I was a F*cked Borrower, I certainly wouldn’t take a loan mod.

Just take a look at what the debtors are jumping for joy over…

http://www.loansafe.org/forum/success-stories-homeowners-who-fought-back-won/22045-boa-successful-permanent-mods-2.html#post307153

Then again, they were probably pretty excited when they signed the docs for that $0 down NegAM toxic loan.

Astute Observation by flyovercountry
2011-01-06 01:42 PM

They are upside down on mortgages and instead of principal reductions, they are getting back interest lumped onto their principal.  They have an illusion of savings because the loans terms are being stretched out and have a lower interest rate, so the payments are lower.  But they are still probaly higher than rent would be.

How long will it be before they have any equity and can sell the place for enough to pay off the loan?

Astute Observation by EconE
2011-01-06 06:06 PM

They’ll probably never have equity.  Some even have deferred principal that will need to be refinanced after the 30-40 year loan period.  It won’t be them refinancing it as they’ll probably be dead by then, so it will be their heirs.

People are giddy about “keeping” their homes but in fact are literally being locked into their homes forever.  By the time they are paid off, they’ll most likely be ready for the bulldozer.  They’re pretty much renting their homes from the bank but they’re responsible for all the maintenance.

Debt slavery at it’s finest.

I’m surprised that there aren’t any bubble blogs that have covered these “modifications” in detail.

Astute Observation by ochomehunter
2011-01-06 09:26 AM

Looks like post from yesterday did not get enough attention, posting again!

Treasury Drops Short Sale Requirements
http://www.cnbc.com/id/40930787/comid/1/cache/718#comments_top
Treasury, last week, decided to change the rules a bit:

HAFA no longer requires that servicers verify the borrowers finances
HAFA no longer requires servicers to determine if the borrowers monthly payment is higher than a 31 percent debt-to-income ratio.
HAFA no longer requires second-lien holders to agree to accept 6 percent of the unpaid principal balance owed them, up to $6,000. Servicers now decide who gets paid how much, with a cap still at $6000.
HAFA now requires borrowers seeking a short sale get an answer/agreement within 30 days.


What caused the bubble? NINJA loans! What will cause the collapse? NINKJA afadavits! with 30-day rule and no seller financial verification, flood of sellers will want to get out of the misery while the rule lasts. Short Sales are going to go thru the roof.

Watch housing market and prices crash hard here.

Astute Observation by awgee
2011-01-06 09:44 AM

Why would this make the housing market crash.  It seems to me that this makes loan mods easier and will result in keeping squatters in homes longer and extend the inevitable result.

Astute Observation by ochomehunter
2011-01-06 09:51 AM

Why? Because HAFA is a short sale program and not loan mod program. Loan mod program has not changed and still requires stringent (BS) standards. Its shocking that since HAFA was implemented, only 661 homes were sold under this program due to previous requirements. Its ironic that Govt. thought you could fight stringent standards of lending against the same NINJA loans, it was DOA.  Now its NINJA with NINJA affidavits, it will do wonders and prices will fall hard.

Astute Observation by awgee
2011-01-06 10:27 AM

Thanks.  Makes perfect sense now.

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2011-01-06 09:55 AM

Housing bust creates new kind of declining city
A study says cities where home prices have fallen the most — including Riverside, San Bernardino and Fresno — could suffer long-term deterioration similar to that of the Rust Belt.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-fi-ghost-towns-20110106,0,3388283.story

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2011-01-06 12:01 PM

I dunno.  Riverside County had the highest population growth last year (percentage wise) of any county in the state.  And much of it was migration (people moving there) as opposed to more births than deaths.

http://californiacitynews.typepad.com/california_county_news/2010/12/slow-to-grow-population-figures-show-modest-increase-riverside-county-w-highest-growth.html

I’ve seen no widespread abandoning of neighborhoods here in the city of Riverside (unlike places like Detroit), although I expected to.  Many houses which seemed like they would never sell were eventually purchased by flippers, fixed up, and resold at a profit.

Here’s a good example:

http://www.redfin.com/CA/Riverside/3680-Franklin-Ave-92507/home/4934263

This is a house which, when I first started tracking it, I thought would remain vacant forever.  Small, old house in a bad neighborhood.  Instead, it eventually was flipped for 2.5 times what the (very small) amount the flipper paid for it.

Then again, I’m talking about the City of Riverside only.  Elsewhere in the county, you have insanity like this…

http://www.redfin.com/CA/Palm-Springs/398-W-Palm-Vista-Dr-92262/home/6044258

This is a house which got flipped five times during the boom, going from $36,000 to $450,000.  Since the crash, it has sold three times on the open market, at prices from $20,000 to $32,500 (so, as little as 95.6% off peak pricing).  The house is trashed and unlivable, and Google Street View caught a drug deal in progress a block north of it.  This part of Palm Springs has a chance to become quite Detroit-like.

Astute Observation by Stan Olshefski
2011-01-06 10:14 AM

This one put 20% down and didn’t withdraw equity. Glad to see that there were at least a few responsible borrowers out there.

I feel sorry that they bought at the wrong time and that they’re going to be soaked.

Astute Observation by Bird
2011-01-06 11:45 AM

I was once an irvinite.  One of the first.  Utopia in a bottle, smothered by the 405 and 5 as they choked it.  Glad to be removed.

Oh, and please,  as it may not be important to you, but would be to Mr. Altman,  Johnny Mandel wrote music for the film,  but Robert Altman’s son wrote the lyric that you credit to Mr. Mandel.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-01-06 03:47 PM

“Johnny Mandel wrote music for the film,  but Robert Altman’s son wrote the lyric that you credit to Mr. Mandel.”

Thanks for the clarification.

Astute Observation by Vincenzo
2011-01-06 01:11 PM

>The Federal Reserve exists to foster moral hazard by preventing banks, businesses, and consumers from feeling the ill effects of their poor financial decisions.

It seems that the Federal Reserve last efforts to ignite inflation and cover mortgage losses actually work.

http://fastfood.ocregister.com/2011/01/06/food-prices-especially-breakfast-items-soar-10-percent/84312/

“Year-over-year food prices rose 10 percent for the most popular store-bought grocery items, especially breakfast foods”

10% up for just one year. Jobs are difficult to find, salaries are going down,... but eggs and milk are getting more expensive.

Astute Observation by flyovercountry
2011-01-06 01:41 PM

To quote one successful loan mod receipient: “Giving God all the glory… will be so relieved to see the updated mortgage statement, but until then I am keeping the faith!!! “

Man, and I thought the old testament god was vengeful.  The new millenium testament god is even worse what with his loan terms!

They are upside down on mortgages and instead of principal reductions, they are getting back interest lumped onto their principal.  They have an illusion of savings because the loans terms are being stretched out and have a lower interest rate, so the payments are lower.  But they are still probaly higher than rent would be.

How long will it be before they have any equity and can sell the place for enough to pay off the loan?

Astute Observation by Swiller
2011-01-06 02:25 PM

So on one hand, when people default they suck and are bad people with no morals or ethics, on the other hand, if they take a mod to *try* and keep the house, they suck and are stupid asses.

I am a “success story” in regards to getting a mod, and that was with the HELP of Loansafe.org and the people that post there.

I got a 30 year fixed, years 1-5 are 2%, every year there after, it rises by 1% and caps at 5%.

Remember, I put 20% down as well and I STILL am tempted to walk because after 2012, the Mortgage Forgiveness Act goes away, and I don’t want to be held to the taxes.

Either way you look at it, I’ve been b&ttfuc;?. So for now, I watch and wait, and if things look like they will stagnate or fall further, looks like another house will go on the backs of the taxpayer. Sucks, but I will not be broke when I retire…and I *will* retire, I’ve got quite a bit of stash in my retirement account as it’s the only place the greedy bastards can’t garnish.

Wall St. made housing a casino, and for that I blame the lack of regulation which started with Saint Ronald Reagan stripping it down. Go Merril Lynch, er, I mean Donald Regan.

Astute Observation by EconE
2011-01-06 06:11 PM

WTF?

You’ve been talking about walking for over a year now yet you get conned into a mod?

I take it you’re not in California as you have now “refinanced” and if you were in Cali, you would have gone from a non-recourse loan into a fully recoursable one.

I wouldn’t consider a single one of the mods that I’ve seen “success stories”.  Not by a long shot.

Astute Observation by ochomehunter
2011-01-06 06:17 PM

This reminds me to bring up a point that one of my friends two homes went into foreclosure in 2009.  two months ago, he received judgement letters from collection agencies looking for 100% of 2nd mortgages. 

It never ends I guess, my friend is scared shit now. I told him to call them back and ask them if they would like a $1000 instead. LOL

Astute Observation by Swiller
2011-01-06 08:47 PM

I wasn’t “conned” into a loan, the entire mortgage industry was fueled by fraud, but none-the-less.

A household of 3, cannot make more than $70,000 and declare a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you *have* to file Chapter 13, which is a payment plan of 36 or 60 months, and the amount to be payed back is determined by the court and your ability to pay.

1st Mortgages or non-recourse regardless whether you re-finance or not as this is California State Law.

HELOCS are fully the owners resposibility, and when the collection agency/ banksters find out how much you make (and they will), they will come seeking you for payment, thousands of people who tried to scam the system will get judgments against them, as it should be.

Those of us who tried to be “conservative” but bought at the worst time in American history, well, we shall suffer loss either keeping the home, or losing it.

Astute Observation by EconE
2011-01-06 09:26 PM

Fair enough.

I said for the longest time that the people who bought as you did were the ones that got screwed the most in the whole deal.  I remember seeing an article in the L.A. Times showcasing a high earning family that bought in Watts for $500k and touting the supposed “gentrification”.  I immediately said “They’re ****ed.”

One question I have…WRT your loan mod, while it’s at the 2% level, are you able to make extra payments to drive down the principle or are there stipulations prohibiting that?

Astute Observation by Swiller
2011-01-07 08:49 AM

No stipulations against early payment. I was one of the very few who made the required DTI in order to satisfy the loan mod requirements.

It wasn’t easy because my lender refused to negotiate with me so I had to force the hand of Chase. by defaulting for 3 months.

The “trial modification” was a contract for 3 months to show ability/discipline to pay, but after 3 months and signed documents, the lender Chase would not finalize my modification…that is until I defaulted AGAIN. After 2 more months of no payment, I was finally given what I been told was the “cadillac” of loan mods. At the time maybe it was, until 30 year fixed mortgages for those who could buy/re-finance went to 4%.

As usual, the ones struggling, trying to do the “right” thing to keep the house, do not get help, while those who live large and have no need for lower rates, get re-financed to have even more discretionary spending.

Astute Observation by ochomehunter
2011-01-07 08:58 AM

I feel for you man. One of the personal I know happens to be a crook! He went to the bank and asked for loan mod, he was told that he needs to default first by BAC, he makes decent 6 figure income. He defaulted and went back to BAC and then they said that you have disposable income, you need to show your expenses are higher than your income, so he went on and bought $50,000 SUV on 3-yr payment plan, for sure he fell within the guidelines. He got the mod, his home value was not lowered but he says that his some $30,000 worth missed payments were forgiven which I dont believe. Anyway, this is the world of crooks and there is no place here to compete with them.

I put an offer on a home at $550,000, with FICO over 800 and downpayment of 10% at hand, bank sat on the short sale offers for 5 months saying that want cash, in the end they sold the home to cash buyer for $460K, and that home recently without any upgrades got flipped for $600K, so go figure.  I definitely believe that bank officers are part of the fraud that is still happening here. Bank was Wells Fargo.

Astute Observation by EconE
2011-01-06 09:28 PM

@OCHomeHunter…

Damn.  Makes you wonder how much the collection agencies are paying for the debt in the first place.

Pay 10c on the Dollar and then go after 100%?

What a racket.

Astute Observation by Serenity Now
2011-01-06 03:03 PM

“In fact, home prices still must fall 23 percent if they are to revert to their long-term mean (Chart 1)”

Keep in mind that the “mean” is based on an average of many up and down market cycles. I would add that, since we are in a down market, the prices should actually fall below their “long term mean”... so, more than 23%.

I’m not claiming Irvine will fall 23+%, but those numbers have to come from somewhere.

Astute Observation by Befuddled
2011-01-06 03:29 PM

I’m trying to make sense of this:  In today’s post IR references an entry from September 17, 2010 entitled How the Lending Cartel Disposes Their REO will Determine the Market’s Fate.  Fair enough.  Always a good idea to go back and examine one’s theses.

However toward the end of the astute observations DarthFerret references a listing in Westpark that is priced at $172/sq. ft.

“$172/sf for a 5BR SFR in Westpark?!?!
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Irvine/32-Vienne-92606/home/4623407
Yep, you read that right. It’s a Westpark 5BR SFRIt will be interesting to see what this eventually sells for. This one will most certainly be flipped, but it is yet another data point on where home prices are headed in Irvine and all of The OC.”

I don’t mean to pick on Darth as I enjoy his input (I just think he got snookered on the short sale come on price as you’ll see in a moment) but he does say in a second post that this is evidence of how Irvine housing prices are being “CRUSHED.”  And perhaps many of else interpreted this the same way.

Unfortunately we were dead wrong.

Being a curious sort I googled the address and surprise surprise, the house sold less than a month later for $965,000 ($333/sq ft). http://www.redfin.com/CA/Irvine/32-Vienne-92606/home/4623407

I understand that the $469,000 asking price was short sale horseshit from a sleezeball realtor,  but the final price makes me wonder if anyone can truly predict housing prices. Or if it even makes sense to try.  I mean it sold for more than TWICE a not altogether unreasonable price ($500,000ish), if one believes that prices are dropping, only two months ago?!  So much for the great contraction of prices.
It all seems incomprehensible to me.  Anyone know a good shrink?

Astute Observation by irvine_home_owner
2011-01-06 05:24 PM

Actually… I don’t think that a short sale, that was a price gimmick by a realtor who uses auction style bidding to get a house sold in one day.

The company is called Rex (I think) and they’ve done a few of these. They basically list a home for a week, dropping the price every day until the day of auction. You’re not allowed to view the home prior to that day and the auction day is the only opportunity to view it. The next day they delist the property, gather the bids, find the highest bid, call ever bidder and give them a chance to beat it.

They’ve done several in Irvine and it’s always a madhouse because of how low the final list price is (which they claim is the reserve but I highly doubt). It seems that they have kept their promise and sold the homes at the highest bid.

Another realtor recently did that with a home in Columbus Grove off of Camilia. Had the auction etc etc but would only call back the top 10 buyers. It looked like it went pending but is now relisted with a different(?) realtor at $1.1m:

http://www.redfin.com/CA/Tustin/16615-Camilia-Ave-92782/home/7202506

Long story short… don’t be fooled by abnormally low prices in Irvine… or anywhere.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2011-01-06 08:56 PM

Another shadow inventory house in Irvine.

It’s listed for half price and ends up selling like it’s 2 houses.

Fools like Darth were a magnet for these shadow inventory listings.

Astute Observation by Befuddled
2011-01-06 03:33 PM

Sorry should read “And perhaps many of us (not else)

Astute Observation by ochomehunter
2011-01-06 03:38 PM

Befuddled, IMHO that low ball original listing was to keep real buyers away instead of spark a bidding war. A lot of realtors who are listing agents are trying to make two commissions representing both buyers and sellers. I have encountered this on two homes that I pursued and I concluded that in this market (Aug to Dec 2010) if you want to buy, you need to partner up with Listing Agent.  I asked one of the listing agents over why they hit so low price, I was told that in short sales the bank sees what the agent shows them (which is wrong) but its done that way. By putting a low offer, it brings in pool of lower offers, much lower than the market value of home. This creates a spread between what his client offered vs what the lower offers are at, and it helps the agent close the deal with his client for below the market value, tricks the banks and lower offer folks. I would not discount the fact taht a lot of short sales have under the table money exchanges between investor buyer and agents+bank negotiators. Fraud may still be at full swing here, these folks dont ever learn and are crooks.

Well, the time has definitely changed now, with prices being lowered everywhere at pace faster than I have ever noticed. There is sense of panic out there by sellers and those who follow prices on Redfin can testify it. The fun has just begun!  And yes, Irvine is not immune!

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2011-01-06 03:49 PM

Where in Irvine are the prices being lowered at a faster pace?

Astute Observation by ochomehunter
2011-01-06 04:04 PM

There aren’t even enough listings in Irvine, but that doesnt mean that are no distressed homes. There are thousands of homes. As South OC corrects at faster speed, it would take out the buyers who would chase value.  Remember, Irvine may fall the the last but it will.  From Peak prices did fall, its just that inventory was held and is being held. With new short sale HAFA rule, we may see acceleration of fradulent sales from the past sold in short sales fradulenty again!

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2011-01-06 04:14 PM

There are many different segments to the Irvine market.
Certain areas like Columbus Grove are well under $300/ft. while other areas have held up and appear healthy.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main