Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- zovall on A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
Recent Posts
- A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
- $499,900 :: 84 Deermont 51, Irvine CA, 92602
A 1% rise in bond yields is not unusual in today’s environment, so it should not signal impending doom for Spain.
Spain’s problem, and Ireland’s too, is the Euro. Yes, their prices are too high, but relative to other Euro-zone countries that lent to their banks. They could very quickly get to where they need to be by a devaluation of the peso, but the Spanish peso is long-gone.
Also, for those saying gov’ts need to run low deficits or surpluses to be safe, that’s what Ireland and Spain did. It was private sector debt that is doing them in (for Ireland, it became public sector when they back-stopped their banks).
We are also not Spain, nor Ireland. Our debts are, for the most part, to other Americans, so the politics, while still thorny, is not nation-v-nation.
The one similarity is what inflated the bubble. Spain being on the euro made their debt seem the same risk-wise as German debt. In our case it was AAA rated sub-prime MBSs being considered comparable or better (they yielded better) than AAA rated prime MBSs.
No one is trying to re-inflate the bubble, at least no one in power at least. I think Obama finally understands the nature of the housing bubble .
“They could very quickly get to where they need to be by a devaluation of the peso”
What kind of mad man argues that stealing from citizens (via inflation via loss in purchasing power) is the solution?
Who is most a/effected by this sort of policy?
Please do the lower class a favor and reconsider ever voting again.
Subprime MBS offered a higher return because they had higher risk, not because they were comparable or better.
Our debts are short term and must be rolled over, in effect, an adjustable rate mortgage. Who is the largest holder of US treasuries? Last i checked it was the federal reserve (bag holder).
The potential devaluation of the peso would happen on its own, it wouldn’t take major intervention. The way you talk you sound like a return to the gold standard would fix everything. But, during the Great Depression, the nations that exited the gold standard first, recovered first, while the ones that stayed with it, were the last to recover.
You can look to many major debt crises over the past 30 years and the key problem is borrowing in someone else’s currency.
Subprime MBS and Prime MBS were considered comparable from a regulatory point of view. Both were AAA and required little capital held against potential loss. That is one of the basic problems of the credit crisis.
The fed is not the biggest holder of treasuries - that would be the SS trust fund (2.4T vs. ~1T). Even after QE2, that will only be up to about ~1.5T.
I agree the devaluation would occur sans intervention, as would the US dollar. Intervention makes the devaluation unnecessarily greater. Private sector debt needs to be liquidated, rates must rise, and the currency will suffer short term, but remain strong long term. The problem is private debt being transferred to the taxpayer. Therein lies the intervention.
Leaving the gold standard is the equivalent of defaulting. Discipline evaporates and wreckless spending is no longer kept in check as other countries following down the path of overspending and inflation. It may appear, through inflation, that countries recover quickly just as it appears we are recovering currently.
It matters not how regulators view different security products. The proper mechanism is the market mechanism of creditors/investors using their own judgement to determine the risk reward ratio. Relying on a regulator or rating agency is foolish.
I did not know the SS (Social Security I am assuming) trust fund is the largest holder. Big bagholder. Have we forgotten the percentage of foreign bagholders?
there are plenty of countries who dont run long term fiscal deficits who have fiat currencies.
In fact, in the 90’s, we ran fiscal surpluses.
As for inflation giving the appearance of recovery, GDP growth is measured in real terms, not nominal terms.
If you don’t believe GDP statistics, give us another measure that we can use for a 14 Trillion dollar economy. and what does this measure tell us about real GDP growth right now?
Not having a currency backed by anything other than the citizens ability to service the debt is dangerous, especially if you are the world reserve currency. Other countries are given less slack in spending as dictated by the market price of the currency. they do not have world reserve currency status and size, thus the market has lower perceived faith. It is possible to be fiscally conservative and fiat, but politically there is much temptation to overspend.
You’re measuring 2 metrics:
One which is manipulated to understate inflation and the other which includes a great deal of unproductive fluff and credit driven consumer spending bolstered by government subsidy. Experiencing true gdp growth during a contraction is impossible.
Private sector production would be the best metric. However, during a boom or bear rally fueled by cheap money, this number may be increasing due to business’ misreading indicators and making malinvestments. Such is the danger of using interest rates to control economies. It also results in a lot of confused citizens trying to figure out if up is down and down is up.
The gold standard is necessarily deflationary and does not promote stability any better than paper money - research the history of panics and depressions in the 1800’s.
Flexible exchange rates are generally accepted to be superior to fixed exchange rates. What’s our complaint with China? They aren’t letting their currency float.
If i have $100, deflation helps me. It encourages me to save money. This is capital creation and a necessary component for jobs. savings represents stability on all levels from the individual to sovereign level.
inflation hurts me. it encourages me to spend money on things with inherent value or gamble to keep pace with inflation. it encourages me to borrow so i can pay debt back with cheaper currency in the future.
Paper money gives the illusion of stability as problems can be deferred to the future. Money tied to a commodity discourages overspending and overborrowing as the consequences must be dealt with in the very near term. this inhibits a society from becoming laden with debt.
Use your mind and common sense to see which is more stable.
so let me get this straight, you want a deflationary environment because it encourage savings?
So a general environment where prices of assets and wages and other things always go down is conducive to inducing savings and investment?
Why don’t use your mind and common sense to actually learn basic economics.
You do realize that you have no idea what you are talking about right?
The basic definition of GDP:
GDP= Consumption + Investment + Government + net exports or minus net imports.
You seem to talk about economics like you understand them but are strangely lacking even the most basic understanding of how GDP is defined.
It is precisely because free markets and the pure gold standard lead inevitably to falling prices that monetarists and Keynesians alike call for fiat money. Yet, curiously, while free or voluntary deflation has been invariably treated with horror, there is general acclaim for the draconian, or compulsory, deflationary measures adopted recently—especially in Brazil and the Soviet Union—in attempts to reverse severe inflation.
But first, some clarity is needed in our age of semantic obfuscation in monetary matters. “Deflation” is usually defined as generally falling prices, yet it can also be defined as a decline in the money supply which, of course, will also tend to lower prices. It is particulary important to distinguish between changes in prices or the money supply that arise from voluntary changes in people’s values or actions on the free market; as against deliberate changes in the money supply imposed by governmental coercion.
Price deflation on the free market has been a particular victim of deflation-phobia, blamed for depression, contraction in business activity, and unemployment. There are three possible causes for such deflation. In the first place, increased productivity and supply of goods will tend to lower prices on the free market. And this indeed is the general record of the Industrial Revolution in the West since the mid-eighteenth century.
But rather than a problem to be dreaded and combatted, falling prices through increased production is a wonderful long-run tendency of untrammelled capitalism. The trend of the Industrial Revolution in the West was falling prices, which spread an increased standard of living to every person; falling costs, which maintained general profitability of business; and stable monetary wage rates—which reflected steadily increasing real wages in terms of purchasing power.
This is a process to be hailed and welcomed rather than to be stamped out. Unfortunately, the inflationary fiat money world since World War II has made us forget this home truth, and inured us to a dangerously inflationary economic horizon.
A second cause of price deflation in a free economy is in response to a general desire to “hoard” money which causes people’s stock of cash balances have higher real value in terms of purchasing power. Even economists who accept the legitimacy of the first type of deflation react with horror to the second, and call for government to print money rapidly to prevent it.
But what’s wrong with people desiring higher real cash balances, and why should this desire of consumers on the free market be thwarted while others are satisfied? The market, with its perceptive entrepreneurs and free price system, is precisely geared to allow rapid adjustments to any changes in consumer valuations.
Any “unemployment” of resources results from a failure of people to adjust to the new conditions, by insisting on excessively high real prices or wage rates. Such failures will be quickly corrected if the market is allowed freedom to adapt—that is, if government and unions do not intervene to delay and cripple the adjustment process.
A third form of market-driven price deflation stems from a contraction of bank credit during recessions or bank runs. Even economists who accept the first and second types of deflation balk at this one, indicting the process as being monetary and external to the market.
But they overlook a key point: that contraction of bank credit is always a healthy reaction to previous inflationary bank credit intervention in the market. Contractionary calls upon the banks to redeem their swollen liabilities in cash is precisely the way in which the market and consumers can reassert control over the banking system and force it to become sound and noninflationary. A market-driven credit contraction speeds up the recovery process and helps to wash out unsound loans and unsound banks.
Peso, peseta, irrelevant.
Note i used the word “includes” which does not mean those are the only components of GDP. Being able to recite the GDP equation is unimportant.
My point is that the consumption and government components of GDP can make it appear as if the 14 trillion dollar economy is “humming”.
In theory, government can always ride to the rescue, laundering money through govt jobs or subsidizing consumption, and increase GDP to keep public perception positive.
I want currency tied to a commodity to discipline government spending.
I do not want government and central bank arbitrarily expanding and contracting the money supply. It creates instability.
I want my cash to hold or increase in value.
Currency would hold value if the government was taken out of the equation. End fiat currency and let the free market decide what is or isn’t money.
Would we only be able to measure prices in nominal terms in a deflationary environment?
Pedantry attack: Spanish currency before the euro was the peseta, not the peso.
IR is correct that the Spanish situation is much, much worse than the American situation. My son lives there; he and his fiancee (especially the latter) have wanted to buy a house, but, using lots of quotes from IHB, we’ve talked them out of it. What is especially interesting is that the Koolaid has lasted much longer there than here—absurdly inflated prices were still being quoted to the kids as recently as 6 months ago (half-a-million euros for a very ordinary 3-bedroom townhouse in a not-very-convenient neighborhood in a provincial city, for instance). Around the big cities in the center of the country there are acres and acres and acres of empty developments with many unfinished buildings with huge signs trying to attract buyers—this in a country with 20% official unemployment and the salaries of government workers (a much higher % of the population than here) being cut by numbers like 5 and 7%. This is a scary situation.
Apologies for the error. It had been so long since it was used, I could not remember.
Sometimes I tried to *Wiki* almost everything I type before hitting the ‘Send’ button
FYI, the old Spanish currency was the Peseta, not the Peso.
subsidized mortgages allowing buyers to pay 25-40% above market:
?como se dice “knife catcher”?
check out distressed properties on google maps (this is for the SF bay area).
CRAZY!
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&q=&mrt=realestate&sll=37.391709,-122.026863&sspn=0.172391,0.362206&ie=UTF8&ei=lREBTdSEGovKpQSR8riaAw&attrid=ee6d68e1e5cb9843_&rq=1&ev=p&split=1&radius=11.93&hq;=&hnear;=&ll=37.333586,-121.973991&spn=0.172525,0.362206&z=12
credit to barry ritholtz for the google map trick:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/12/google-map-foreclosures/
Check out “Government, Fannie Mae Considering Help for Housing Investors” http://www.cnbc.com/id/40590863
Son of bitches again trying to make rich richer! Let the damn thing correct! If vulures want to buy, let them pay market rate and not discounted rate or any assistance!
Hello All -
It seems that the bond bubble and RE mortgage rates maybe starting to loose the hot air.
Let’s hope that QE 2/3/4 can keep things low long enough to absorb all of this overpriced housing in OC. If not we will see a significant step down in pricing. Also, please realize there is a huge difference between commodity inflation (which we see now) and the pressue put on “leveraged assets” like housing. It’s one thing to pay more for gas and milk (those prices will go up with inflation) but, totally different when you have to borrow money to pay for “leveraged assets” like housing.
There will be terrible compression IMHO for housing prices as rates rise. If people can barely afford housing at 4% rates wait untill you see what happens when rates hit 7,8,10% rates on a 30 year fixed.
It’s not the price point you buy at but, the price point you have to sell at in a decade when people have to borrow the money at much higher rates.
Inflation will raise the cost of cash purchases but, destroy the prices of assets that need leverage.
Just my .02
BD
All this said, I never would have thought that a bus driver in LA working for the city would make 65K a year. Let’s hope we all see huge wage inflation.
We are in a bad, bad, bad, scenario. This is the result of a bubble and huge excesses. We in the OC will likely be Japan. Prices grind lower for a decade and then go sideways for another….
BD
The public and private pension excesses will keep the ‘redistribution of wealth’ at the top of the agenda. We in CA and OC / LA / SF are in for a long bumpy ride over the forseeable future.
How do you raise taxes on the makers to give to the takers? Housing is just a symptom of the problem compounded by ‘never seen on Earth’ excesses in housing - especially in the high-priced markets.
Timber!
My .02
BD
Ben Franklin and FDR come to mind of American who used inflation to pay off the US debt. Pay back with cheapen money. It’s worked for 200+ years and the bankster got to Federal Reserve to keep that sort of inflating in check or at least for their members. It’s just human nature at work—greed.
Any long term graphes on Japan’s housing prices to see the span for the bubble and the burst. Mostly one the burst, but how long did it take to inflate? The US policy is Japan II, low interest, high unemployment and attempts to inflate housing. As I recall, there’s a number of Japanese Gen-Xers that have never worked. Their parents continue to work in their retirement year to support their grown children. Very sad and a high social cost that those families. Will it happen in America?
When will housing be affordable in OC?
Newbie 2001 -
Yep…! We are at a tipping point with housing in the OC.
Be not afraid! Ha! Housing prices and other leveraged assets will spiral down if we end up with a decade or more of rising rates. The best that can happen is slowly rising rates and modest inflation. The worst than can happen is the US economy recovers at the same time Brazil, Russia, India, and CHINA continue to consume larger and larger parts of the commodity pie i.e resources. Then we will see Carter like rates - 17% on borrowed money.
I dare anyone to go to a mortgage calculator and plug in 17% rates on a 30 year fixed and see if they believe thay can afford to pay 400K on a 1M property listed today!
Not possible.
My .02
BD
IR - Although not an Irvine property, will you work your magic and post a property history on this Riverside listing? The owner is an acquaintance and is bragging about not making a mortgage payment in 3 years.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Riverside/10133-Woodbridge-Ln-92509/home/6444230
Thanks for writing another interesting article.
1) You write: “the level of debt isn’t supportable by incomes are forces that will put more inventory on the market preventing house prices from rising until the debt is purged.”
The debt will never “be purged”.
I believe, currencies world wide will collaps, and then the debt be applied to all people, that is every man, woman, and child: all will live in debt servitude.
2) You reference your article of earlier this year where you state: “Prices are only sustained by very low inventories which are a result of lenders refusing to foreclose.”
It MAY be that this will continue.
3) In my article ...
Mortgage Backed Bonds And Real Estate Tumble Lower As The Ten Year Interest Rate Moves Higher ... I wrote: “The rise in the mortgage interest rate has terminated the bankers FASB 157 entitlement to mark real estate to managers best estimate; now higher mortgage interest rates are calling real estate prices lower.”
As interest rates go higher the sham of current valuations will be exposed and may produce an incentive for bankers and real estate companies to foreclose and rent.
4) In today’s article, which I have linked to, I write: I believe that we are on the verge of another strong sell off of the world’s major currencies, DBV, and emerging market currencies, CEW, driving financial and small cap shares quickly lower as concerns arise once again over the ongoing European sovereign debt banking symbiosis crisis.
5) You ended your article with this rather postive remark: We may find out here what prices are supposed to be in 2011. The Federal Reserve is no longer buying mortgage debt and the government tax subsidies have expired. The government is no longer directly supporting house prices; although, it can be argued that the explicit backing of mortgage debt through the FHA and the GSEs is a market support. With the props removed, the market will wend its way toward a natural equilibrium. Most likely that means falling prices in 2011.”
My response is that I see a catastrophic failure of banking both in the US and in Europe, and I see that coming withing days and weeks, most certainly by February 2011.
6) You write: “Since the banks were giving out free money, most homeowners (at least the ones who have tried to sell houses in Irvine since 2006) took the free money as it became available and spent it. Their goal seemed to be to make sure no equity was left behind.”
I find that helpful, because you are one of the few to reveal the truth of the widespread use of mortgage equity withdrawl ... No equity left behind was an important economic stimulus, that I believe after having read other reports, Alan Greenspan was aware of ... Not only was it the homeowners goal to make sure no equity was left behind, but also Alan Greenspan’s as well. He could have shut down toxic lending, but I think he wanted to have an expansionary economy, and I think that he and Robert Rubin, knew of a day when the banks and the Federal Government would be integrated into a combine, that is melded together into state corporatism. So he let things go their wild way.
Had I not found your blog, I would have been to “callow” to comprehend and believe in the widespread and deep practice of mortgage equity withdrawl, even to the point of leaving no equity behind.
My callowness precluded me from getting and coolaid and stimulus.
7) The Fed has a real problem on its hands, its QE2 is not working, as it has set the bond markets on fire. And there is 1 Trillion in excess reserves that will continually destroyed by higher interest rates. And it has distressed securities, which trades like junk bonds, on its books.
So I am expecting deleverging, disinvestment and falling financial market prices and no real estate sales.