Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Recent Posts
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Investors Are Busy in Irvine’s Low-End Housing Market
- Artist in Residence: Turtle Rock Glen Townhome
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $458,500 :: 3 Ultimo Dr, Irvine CA, 92620
- $398,900 :: 191 Lockford, Irvine CA, 92602
I am not one usually to advocate strategic default, but if the comps in your ‘hood are > 2/3rds off what you paid in 2004 (! what were people paying in 2006?), there is little reason to stay, as long as you can rent for considerably less than what you’re paying. Don’t feel bad for the banks. They wrote the loans that inflated the bubble in that area, there’s no reason for residents to shoulder a disproportionate share of the pain.
It requires caution to write about prices falling when even the WSJ article singles out LV and parts of CA/AZ/FL. The high concentration of foreclosures is itself concentrated in the bubble areas with the weakest non-housing/RE economies.
There were two foreclosure sales in our neighborhood in 2009. They were builder foreclosures largely the result of legal troubles for the builder. For one there was a minimal discount (the other was not complete, so there was a significant discount). They are a small number of the homes in the neighborhood and didn’t budge comps. Two homes on our street will sell for more than they did new in 2007 (one already did and the other is under contract). Two homes that have not been sold & on the market for 2 years are both being rented. One of which has to be rented for more than the mortgage payment.
The biggest issue with home prices, and one that seems to be very important to Irvine is supply and real demand. It’s not that a given median income will support a given home price. This is how I smelled the bubble in FL. They kept building $500k-$1M homes like it was going out of style, but I could see NO new jobs supporting those types of home prices. Looking back, it was probably all either people using bubble equity or speculators absorbing all that new inventory. No matter what home prices do, I can’t see enough jobs moving to that area to support that housing stock. A lot will turn into very expensive part-time homes for Canadians and South Americans.
As much as I hate to say it, South Cal is unique. People want to live here. They are willing to pay a premium to live here. Their purchasing power is not just based on income; yes most who buy here have very good salaries but also they often have other compensations like stock options and investments which generate additional income to their salaries. Also don’t underestimate the amount of purchasing money contributed from other memebers of their immediate families. To a lot of cultures, buying a house (a nice one in a nice neighborhood in one of the most desirable part of the U.S.) is a familial effort.
If people want to live here, that’s great, but the statistics don’t bear your thoughtline out. Orange County lost a net 108,000 people in 2010. They are likely being replaced over time by Service Sector employment jobs as per the County of Orange’s data. This means that if the average SS employment income is $30kpy, and the average home price is $450k, you’ll need quite the large family to bunk together in order to afford the monthly nut.
Southern California isn’t unique. It’s not immune, nor is it different than any other place with artificially puffed prices. Once we get to a Vegas or Phoenix style price deflation point, then it can be said recovery is neigh.
My .02c
Soylent Green Is People.
Case-Shiller indices for LA & San Diego are both down 36% from peak, so the idea that So Cal is ‘different’ in a way that is ‘different’ from either LV or other bubble areas is just false. The OC is represented in the LA index.
To say the whole county of SD is down 36% from the peak is just as false. Take Carmel Valley in SD for example. It’s down 10% from it peak due to its location proximity to the ocean and most importantly its excellent schools.
It’s an index of the whole SD area. I’ll leave it for you to research how it’s calculated, but it’s the gold standard of home price records. But, with it, you will see some areas of an index have better results than others areas in the same index.
Attention young newbee…
From old wise one who lived in “unique” So Cal though the last housing bust of the early 90s (soo last century). So Cal is not unique. Price declines have occured here before and will occur again. The fact that declines have not happened yet does not mean that they are not going to happen. Remember the the BLACK SWAN.
Lot’s of bullish sentiment here lately. It almost feels like we are back in 2006. I thought it would take a good 20 to 30 years before folks started whipping up the “it is different here” enthusiasm again.
How does the Kool-Aid taste?
“People” want to live here. What does that even mean? California has 37 million people, the vast majority are in SoCal, so I guess you’re right.
But then why are prices in the Bay Area, where fewer people live, higher than here?
So Cal is a desirable place to live, just as it was in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s. That factor has already been priced into the market for decades. When when the market contiues to inflate faster than wages or faster than real estate elsewhere… Is it because it is getting more an more special over time, or is it because it is a bubble?
Southern CA is more desirable? I guess with nicer weather it makes being homeless easier.
Thanks for your bright input.
newbee is a home owner.
Wrong. Currently renting at $2500/month.
Made a couple of offers in the last few months but chickened out each time because renting and buying cost about the same. Why take on more risks and headache when the upside of owning is limited?
Good schools sell houses. Period. Looking around, those neighborhoods with excellent elemtary, middle and high schools almost always fare much better than others with lower ranking schools in a down market. A lot of people recognize the importance of childhood education and are willing to pay a pretty penny to be in an area with excellent schools.
I hope the new Governor will manage to cut the state deficit. It means substantial cuts on public education. Then the number of students per Irvine teacher will be 40-50, all sport and art teachers will get pink slips. It’ll be difficult to advertise “excellent schools in Irvine”.
What about this private school: http://calvarylife.org/ccschool/index.html
The annual costs are $3,000-5,000.
It’s strange, but I haven’t seen many Latino students there; though, it’s in the middle of Santa Ana. How many students per teacher? Probably, 10.
Sadly that would likely improve Irvine schools relative to surrounding areas. The Irvine schools have a high ranking because of hard working students who come from families and cultures that value education. Those hard working students would continue to score high on the test that factor into school rankings. Surrounding areas would see further declines. The US education system is unfair.
Certainly, the US education system is unfair.
In the capitalist world, if you want to send your kid to a better school, you just pay more to the school itself. The school prospers and hires the best teachers. And the school can be located in a poor and bad neighborhood.
The truth is no boss in America cares about your school when he/she hires you to a technical position. You just have to pass a test measuring your technical, programming, etc skills. It doesn’t matter if your school was Northwood High or New Delhi High.
It’s different in Asian countries. If a kid graduates from a prestigious university, he/she is hired by a corporation for life. No tests are necessary.
“Are the shadow inventory deniers still making fools of themselves, or has everyone accepted that shadow inventory is real and not that hard to find?”
Did I read that correctly? Are you saying someone else looks like a fool? Am I not reading the Benedict Arnold of bubble blogging? The guy who can ridicule “Irvine Ponzi’s” in one paragraph as his ‘Irvine Renter’ persona, but then seamlessly transition into ‘Larry Las Vegas’ in the next paragraph—the parasite who relies on the misfortune of desert “ponzi’s” to operate his vulture house flipping business?
Do what you have to do, it is a tough economy and I am sure you may be involved in business ventures you would not have in the past—- in the interest of caring for your family. But as you mock others don’t forget the old saying about those who live in glass houses. Think about that as you head to the New Year. Think about how YOU might have gone a different direction—against your previous beliefs—- to support your family. Then apply that to the ‘ponzi’s’ you mock here for all their friends and family to see. Do you really know what drove their behavior? Think about those Buddhist teachings you implied you followed in the past. Given your ‘flip’ in the last year, maybe a little restraint in how you view the misfortune of others might be in order?
So that’s enough of this drivel for me. I should have stayed away after my year hiatus from IHB. Damn that peson who told me I needed to come back and read this blog again, that I would be amazed. They were right about the amazed part, though.
Happy New Year!
Don’t come back. You were not missed.
The Karma Police stopped by for a visit, similar to the spelling police very accurate and spot on with their post, but an emotional snore.
Hey IrvineRenter, is Patrick Star the rent skimming landlord whose house you took? I would be pissed off too!
I think Patrick Star is the fool who used to go by the username Newport Skipper. I don’t feel the least bit sorry for all these ponzi helocers losing their homes, fuck em. The sooner we get them out of the system, the sooner things return to normal. And if you can make money on the way, so be it.
Happy New Year!
Just to set the record straight PStar was neither a landlord, NewportSkipper or a HELOC’er… in fact, he was an Irvine renter, just like Larry.
lot of angry home owners today.
probably good news for renters :D
Entertaining article on HoA politics:
Housing Pain Pits Neighbor Against Neighbor in Florida
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703326204575616340542578852.html
Thanks for sharing your thought: “I don’t believe house prices will fall a large amount from here”.
In 1997, I stumbed across the book En Route to Global Occupation by Gary H. Kah; it shaped by conviction that one day I would see the economic collapse of the United States. That day is very near. From here I expect a fast economic fall; and as a consequence, I see practically no house sales and in that sense, the bottom is going to come in quite low.
Although I am not an Austrian Economist, I read their web sites to get an economic understanding of debt and currencies.
Michael Pinto in linked article Rising Rates Reveal Debt Reality relates: “the conceptalling interest rates and reduced durations have merely given the illusion of solvency to the US as compared to these other ailing sovereigns.”
“Right now, the US national debt is the biggest subprime ARM of all time. Much like homeowners who thought they could afford a mortgage that was 10 times their annual incomes, Messrs. Krugman and Wesbury are blinded by deceptively low current rates of interest. These ostriches won’t poke their heads up to see the writing on the wall: low rates and quantitative easing cannot coexist for long. As rates continue to rise, the reality of US insolvency will be revealed.”
Bank insolvency will probably show first….This country and county needs more jobs now….. debt reduction later. How much did housing prices fall during the 30’s depression peak to valley? Do you really think they will fall another 20% from here? Here’s for a better New Year in 2011…...
speaking of falling prices, dja’ all c this?
harry potter, i mean, henry paulson, after he TARPed the banks $700 large LOST a cool mill. on his OWN (i am sure fashionable) DC home.
and i quote:
Paulson sold his three-bedroom home in a tony Washington neighborhood last week for close to a third less than his initial asking price and more than $1 million below what he paid for it more than four years ago.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/31/AR2010123103722.html?hpid=sec-business
jed,
Hank Paulson’s net worth is about $700 million, so this $1 million loss on his Washington DC home is about 0.15% of his net worth. If you lost 0.15% of your net worth, would you sweat?
For people like Hank, real estate costs are just like our expenditure on electronics. Think about it: If your net worth is $1 million, then 0.15% of it is $1,500, about the cost of an HDTV.
Although prices have fallen since the peak, they are still far above their previous lows in 1996, even after adjusting for 40% or so inflation since then.
Why? Well, the difference is entirely due to government intervention in the housing market. Future taxpayers have been designated as the payers, to pay to keep home prices high. For young buyers, that means you will be paying the taxes that distort the market now, forcing you to pay more for a house today. A little double hit.
How low can house prices go in Southern California? It’s a cyclical market, and the last cycle bottomed in 1996. We are still way above that level, and the only reason is government intervention. Where prices go is not a function of the market. It is a function of Federal Reserve quantitative easing actions, and FHA and Fannie and Freddie supports for below-market loans.
This is not an anti-government rant. It’s just a statement of what factors will determine house prices in So Cal in the years ahead. The market has lots of room to go down (or up), as evidenced by history. All that matters now is the amount of money the government will direct at the housing market. They can dial the price level at will, and have already done so. I don’t know what they will decide to do next year, or in 5 years time.