Bargain

Jan 30th, 2008   by IrvineRenter  in Rentals


The Who I'd gladly lose me to find you
I'd gladly give up all I got
To catch you I'm gonna run and never stop

I'd pay any price just to win you
Surrender my good life for bad
To find you I'm gonna drown an unsung man

I'd call that a bargain
The best I ever had
The best I ever had

Bargain -- The Who

.

.

There are always bargains in the rental market. Something has to define value, and as has been discussed in numerous posts on this blog, rents are where it is at. Today I want to look at the rental market for 3 bedroom units. I am excluding pseudo-apartments and looking at both attached and detached properties to see where the leading edge of rents (and thereby house values) can be found.

Rental
$2200 / 76 Sequoia Tree Lane

This property is the least expensive 3/2 with an attached two-car garage I could find. It does not appear to be updated or particularly well kept. It is located in University Park in a quiet, interior location with an easy walk to 2 community pools.

$2295 / 3br - CHARMING DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOME

This looks like a particularly good deal. It is relatively inexpensive, fully detached, it doesn't look to bad from the one interior picture shown, and it has a very spacious yard by Irvine standards. An address is not given, but the Walnut/Yale intersection would put it in El Camino Real.

$2300 / 31 Potomac

This unit is in Northwood just behind the small shopping center on Yale and Trabuco Canyon. It is a short walk to a tot lot and community swimming pool. I have seen units in this neighborhood, and I would guess there is a small, concrete-patio back yard. Very good price though.

$2300 / 3br - 2.5 Bath in Irvine

This property is also in Northwood near the Potomac property. These are attached condos that feel like an apartment complex. The unit itself is newly updated with granite tops in the kitchen.

$2350 / 3br - 3 bed/2 bath with 1244 sq ft in Woodbridge

This appears to be a single-story attached condo in Woodbridge. There are others in this area asking $2,500. This isn't a bad price for the area.

$2500 / 3br - ..3 bed/2.5 ba/Garage/Upgrade/townhome...agent 2500

This Corta Bella unit seems reasonably priced, but no real bargain. It appears to be being offered by an agent. Do you think he is a floplord?

$3200 / 3br - Beautiful House in Turtle Ridge

I put this one in just for fun. I have seen lower priced rentals in Turtle Ridge. I guess you just need some kool aid...

.

.

Based on the above comps, we can establish the leading edge of rental values for non-updated, small 3/2s with attached garages are going for $2,300 in the market. This puts their fundamental value at $368,000 assuming the rents remain stable. This time last year, I was looking for rentals, and I do not remember so many 3/2s being offered for under $2,500. One of the reasons I wanted to do this series of posts on rentals is to document the rise and fall of rental rates over time. We will check back again later.

If properties of this description are worth $368,000, how much are they currently asking in the for-sale market?

19 Deodar

 

Price: $470,000

 

GRM = 204


19 Deodar, Irvine, CA 92604

Beds: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq. Ft.: 1,517
$/Sq. Ft.: $310
Lot Size: 2,112 sq. ft.
Type: Condominium
Style: Other
Year Built: 1976
Stories: Two Levels
Area: El Camino Real
County: Orange
MLS#: S504840
Status: Active
On Redfin: 137 days

Unsold in 90+ days

BEAUTIFUL IMMACULATE HOME!!! REMODELED WITH HARDWOOD FLOORING, TILED BATHROOMS, AND CUSTOM TOUCHES THROUGHOUT. STAINLESS STEEL APPLIANCES. CATHEDRAL VAULTED CEILINGS. FIREPLACE IN LIVING ROOM AND MASTER BEDROOM, BRIGHT AND OPEN KITCHEN. LARGE PATIO.

.

.

9 Ericson Aisle

 

Price: $499,999

 

GRM = 217


9 Ericson Aisle, Irvine, CA 92620

Beds: 3
Baths: 2
Sq. Ft.: 1,679
$/Sq. Ft.: $298
Lot Size: -
Type: Condominium
Style: Townhouse
Year Built: 1989
Stories: Two Levels
View(s): Peek-A-Boo, Has View
Area: Northwood
County: Orange
MLS#: S507288
Status: Active
On Redfin: 119 days

Unsold in 90+ days

Gorgeous townhome in highly sought-after tract. Premium interior location + one of the largest models available! Inviting floorplan enhanced by soaring vaulted ceilings + custom upgrades. Expansive living room features recessed lighting, custom slate-wall fireplace & a myriad of well placed windows. Charming chef's kitchen boasts raised ceilings + eating area & attached patio. Huge master suite w/ lavish bath & private balcony. Easy access to shopping, entertainment & freeways. WOW!

.

802 Terra Bella

 

Price: $465,000

 

GRM = 202


802 Terra Bella, Irvine, CA 92602

Beds: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq. Ft.: 1,476
$/Sq. Ft.: $315
Lot Size: -
Property Type Attached, Condominium
Year Built: 2000
Stories: 2 Level
View: Pool
Area: Out of Area
County: Orange
MLS#: C08008466
Status: Active
On Redfin: 8 days

Northpark community. Great corner unit, very private. Balcony with view of the pool and green belt. Spacious living room with fireplace, bright kitchen with view of the green belt. ceramic tiles in all the bathrooms, kitchen, laundry room and berber carpert. Lowest price for a 3 bedroom unit. Submit all reasonable offers. Lender owned sold "as is" no warranty. All information believed to be correct please verify for your client.

.

59 Sapphire

 

Price: $499,900

 

GRM = 217


59 Sapphire, Irvine, CA 92602

Beds: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq. Ft.: 1,500
$/Sq. Ft.: $333
Lot Size: -
Type: Condominium
Style: Contemporary, Mediterranean
Year Built: 2001
Stories: Two Levels
View(s): Mountain, Park or Green Belt, Peek-A-Boo, Trees/Woods
Area: West Irvine
County: Orange
MLS#: S514971
Status: Active
On Redfin: 47 days

STUNNING SHOWCASE HOME! Very PRIVATE END UNIT w/ Larger PATIO than most. Lots of High Quality Upgrades featuring; Corian Kitchen Counters w/ full backsplash & Maple Cabinetry, High-end GE Profile Appliances, Designer Italian Porcelain Tiles, Custom-Designed Entertainment Center w/ Surround Sound, Security System, Ceiling Fans & Recessed Lighting throughout home. Elegant French Doors leading to Flagstone Patio. Functional Loft/Tech Area & Upstairs' Laundry Room. VERY LOW ASSOCATION FEES.

.

.

As you can see, GRMs for this product are hovering between 200 and 220. This is real progress from the 250-280 units like this were going for at the peak. These products are the least desirable of the 3/2s in the market, so there is the very real possibility they may drop below parity with rents because not everyone will want to be an owner-occupant. The bottom for these will probably be closer to 140 which translates to a bottom price of about $325,000. We still have a way to go.

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by Timing It Right In OC
2008-02-03 01:28 PM

C’mon—those condos are hideous!  Who wants to buy a pink condo in 2008??!!  Dated - dated - dated.  What shape is the HOA in?  How is the infrastructure holding up?  What are the monthly HOA fees and how much is in the HOA reserves?  The one issue not being mentioned much is that where condo owners can’t pay their mortgages, they certainly aren’t paying their HOA fees.  In communities with lots of HOAs—like Aliso Viejo—HOAs are starting to have some serious cash flow issues.  Aliso Viejo is poised to become - IMO—the biggest slum of South County.  HIGH density housing; new sub-associations that are not even selling (Vantis lofts & the new golf course homes - lobbied for by the idiot mayor); coupled with a high volume of morons who used their homes as ATMs to buy the plasmas, new furniture, SUVs, etc. = extremely high foreclosure rate = vacant homes = squatters = higher crime = declining neighborhoods = blight - blight- blight.  Anyone driven through that rat hole lately?  Landscaping is seriously deteriorating.  The MLS lists several homes on the market >$1M.  Total joke.  No one would take that kind of $$ to that kind of community.  At least Irvine has better schools/community services/more adequate law enforcement.

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2008-02-01 08:47 PM

If you believe inflation is rising, and likely to continue doing so the best possible thing is to borrow as much money as you can.

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2008-02-01 08:46 PM

Housing beat the pants off inflation for a decade, thus inflation has some catching up to do.  That is part of the bailout plan.  Put a temporary floor in, and wait for fundamental (ahem incomes) to increase to a supportive level.

Astute Observation by tonye
2008-01-31 11:45 AM

Again.. the farther away from the ocean the most difficult it is to justify a high price.

In a RE price contraction the homes farther from the ocean are more likely to lose more value.

What people paid in the last bubble is irrelevant.  There we no new SFH on the ocean side of TR that sold under 1.5MIL or so.  Hence, folks went out and bought stuff way out on the other side of the Northwood.  It was a marketing schema not tied to geography nor California RE history.

Sorry, but those areas were grossly overpriced and the notion of a “premium” location is a flat place like that feels just too contrived.

Now, if you were talking Tustin or Anaheim Hills.... those neigborhoods are very nice and many homes have views. 

But not on the OC inland flats.

Astute Observation by CK
2008-01-30 11:44 PM

Hey IPO....lol.  But tell me this—if given the opportunity tell me you would not want to spend just one day in the shoes of Mr. Brady???  That dude is DEFINITELY livin the life.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 11:04 PM

CK my boy, who’s talking about APIs?!  I just hate Beckman’s mascot… Patriots, who wants their kid to be a Patriot?  Makes me think of Tom Brady and that makes me want to vomit.

smile

Astute Observation by CK
2008-01-30 11:02 PM

Sorry Fair Economist (from the discussion board)....I meant “Capitalism Works”.  I guess econ and capitalism tend to blur together in my brain…

Astute Observation by CK
2008-01-30 10:00 PM

Fair Economist and IPO --- C’mon guys, don’t push that propoganda that the TUSD schools serving Irvine are somehow inferior to IUSD schools. 

Beckman comes in a little lower than the Irvine comps --- But Beckman API is 804, not 700.  Northwood is 858 and Irvine HS is 827.  Check for yourself:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/apireports.asp

Further, anyone who remembers how they drew the boundary for Beckman knows why score is 804.  A little drilling into the Beckman numbers reveals a score of 890 for Asians, and 836 for Whites. Northwood HS is 895 for Asians and 834 for Whites. This indicates to me that little Emma or Ethan is going to get a pretty comparable education regardless of which side of Culver they live on. Not to mention that Beckman is the newest HS in the area by half a decade --- which equals the latest technology. 

One more thing --- Pioneer MS in TUSD outscores ALL Irvine middle schools at 923.

Astute Observation by alan
2008-01-30 09:07 PM

Does this include a free pass to drive on 17 mile drive?

Astute Observation by awgee
2008-01-30 06:57 PM

Inflation does not guarantee a rise in home prices, and in this particular cycle it appears that home prices will decline while other prices will rise.  The rise is non-discretionary goods may even cause home prices to fall further.

Astute Observation by No_Such_Reality
2008-01-30 05:45 PM

That’s a nice place, but at 119 days on the MLS it has the appearance of a ‘make me move price’.

Look at the new purchase price in 1998.  5% annual inflation puts it at $730K.  3% puts it at $620K.

Today probably needs $999K to sell.  Or maybe $900K.

Astute Observation by Genius
2008-01-30 05:30 PM

Any gain or loss is vapor until you press the magical sell button.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 05:09 PM

The prices that people have paid over the past few years tells the story tonye.  The house under discussion here sold for $1.25M in 2004… Pricing at peak was probably $1.4M.

You may be partial to TR, but obviously others disagree with you as they have paid big money over the past few years to buy in Northpark.  Not as much as to live in TR, but much more than probably almost every other area in Irvine.

You are a wise and educated fellow.  In spite of personal preferences, I am sure you realize that people have different tastes and that where the dollars go tells the story about valuations.

Astute Observation by surfing in newport
2008-01-30 05:05 PM

I must not have been clear.

Mortgage Rates = future inflation + spread.

Spread is approximately 2 to 3%

Most likely, fed will cause inflation so that deflation in the housing sector does not spread to the rest of the economy.

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 04:59 PM

You really think we would have higher interest rates without the threat of inflation?  I guess I could come up with some crazy scenarios, but chances are much higher interest rates and higher inflation will go hand in hand.

The other likely scenario (IMO) would be low interest rates and deflation.

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2008-01-30 04:52 PM

Ipop,

That’s a very nice house indeed.
I don’t think you could go wrong with that one.
We’re just in different places, schools and kids are not a factor for me right now, but I can see where you and others are coming from.

Astute Observation by surfing in newport
2008-01-30 04:48 PM

I see two distinct types of housing economies:

1) Bubble market where housing is bid up to what the marginal buyer can just barely qualify for.
2) Normal market where housing and rents are balanced...don’t care what the GRM is, just that it’s where it “should be”. That is based on home appreciation at just over the rate of inflation.

In scenario #1, rising interest rates will cause housing prices to decrease because the price is determined by what people can afford. If the interest rate is higher, then the price must decrease to stimulate demand. So why would I want to buy when interest rates are at historic lows? The only thing that can happen is for interest rates to go up and therefore the price of my house to go down.

In scenario #2, rising interest rates are because the “experts” feel inflation is going to be higher in the future. The spread between mortgages and 10 year T-bills and between T-bills and inflation are fairly constant. That is why the fed lowering interest rates had no effect and by ipop’s account causes mortgage rates to rise. Why? Because cheaper credit usually means more inflation. So in this scenario, rising interest rates will increase the monthly payment, but you will be willing to live with the higher payment because while it is more expensive than rent now, you have locked in that payment for 15-30 years, so eventually it will be cheaper than rent and inflation will make your house worth more. But note, that if you invested your down payment, your investment returns would also be greater, so it’s not that big of an effect. So in this case, the interest doesn’t matter with respect to rent vs. buy, just as long as the interest rate reflects the actual expectations of inflation.

Given that we are currently in scenario #1, I’m personally hoping for rising interest rates.

Astute Observation by thisblogsavedme$100K
2008-01-30 04:44 PM

If you think the OC is bad...I live in Carmel.  Inventory is not moving here at all.... I live in a 3 bed room, 2500 sqft 1959 house.  It sold in August for $1,240,000.  I rent it for $2700, on a month to month.  60 second walk to the beach.  I stand in the front yard and look at the 18th at Pebble Beach wink

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 04:40 PM

Capitalismworks,

was that directed at me?

I don’t assume rates will go up or down.  I think they should go up based on the state of our economy, but I realize I have no control over them..... and I also realize our government is prone to make mistakes.

Astute Observation by tonye
2008-01-30 04:39 PM

Super Premium?  On the wrong side of University Drive?  You gotta be kidding me man.  ROTFLOL.

You are the victim of the Irvine Co.’s marketing.

Astute Observation by tonye
2008-01-30 04:36 PM

We just locked in two CDs.  One for a year at 5.05% APR and another for two years a hair below that.

Hopefully my wife’s 401K trustee will get off their ass and send us her money so that we can lock into more CDs before the interest drops crater the market.

I don’t know if you remember.  Back in 1981 CDs peaked at 18.5%.  I had my parents sell all of their CDs at 15%, take the penalty and invest the money into 18.5% for anywheres between 2.5 to 4 years.

They thought I was a genius.

He made money.

Since I have a fixed 30 year, I wouldn’t mind a bit of 15% rates for a while so long as my income keeps up with inflation.  It would make my mortgage flat out cheap.  ;-D

Low interest rates and low inflation are not good for long term ownership.  We want some serious inflation to make our payments cheap.

BTW- What is a “chef’s kitchen”?  It was in one of those listings.  Is that like a gourmet kitchen without the granite, stainless steel and gas range?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-01-30 04:32 PM

Inflation certainly has some strange effects on people’s behavior. In the late 70s, people were purchasing houses with DTIs over 60%. It sounds insane, but if inflation is running 20% per year, and the economy is in a wage/price spiral that DTI drops very quickly to something manageable.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 04:29 PM

Personally, I’d rather have this one in Northwood:

http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1182645

If you have little kids, you get Canyon View.  High school kids, you get a short little walk to Northwood High.  Forget Beckman.

Astute Observation by lendingmaestro
2008-01-30 04:23 PM

Let them buy.  Sales prices and the median price can’t fall until people start buying.  It won’t be enough to stop the freefall in prices so they will continue to fall until more people want to buy than sell, at which time prices will start to be bid up.

Astute Observation by tonye
2008-01-30 04:22 PM

Just tell her that at that point it won’t matter which were good ones to start with.

With the money you save you’ll be able to rebuilt the kitchens, bathrooms and most of the house before you move in. 

The end result is that you’ll have a home that was made for you.

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2008-01-30 04:20 PM

What if interest rates don’t get this low again for oh 20 years?  Does that change your outlook on the realtor proposition regarding rates.  For some reason everyone assumes that low interest rates are guaranteed inthe future.  You must have a lot of faith in the Fed, and that the inflation genie is safely bottled up.

Astute Observation by janitorTom
2008-01-30 04:14 PM

great observation

Astute Observation by Iblis
2008-01-30 04:14 PM

I’ll wait for the TV miniseries, hopefully starring Sally Field.

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2008-01-30 04:12 PM

Oh those lucky sellers are certainly short housing.  I don’t know that the metaphor is all the bad however.  The point is the both renters and homeowners can be considering speculators on inflation with homeowners betting on rising inflation and renters betting decreasing inflation.  The assumption that the call option on inflation is the premium an owner should be willing to pay to the renter (subsidized rent) in order to immunize future housing costs from inflation, is my argument for the base price on housing for owners always falling above the rental equivalent value (in a rational market).

Don’t confuse being “short” with short selling.  I am not referring to short selling a house (and yes there is not way to do this, there was a futures contracts designed to payout based on regional housing index movements, but last time I checked there was not enough liquidity on the contracts to the long side).  By short I am referring to a view on a an economic variable, in this case inflation.  If one believes that inflation were likely to spike to late 70s/early 80s type levels in the near future the fundamental analysis used to compare rent vs. buy changes completely (I don’t believe this, but then again I am not 100% sure). In an environment of rapid reflation (rising inflation), the renter is forced to endure ever rising costs of housing because he is “short inflation”.  To a large extent this increased cost of housing should be mitigated by rising wages with the assumption that the economy can’t have sustainable reflation in asset prices without the commensurate increases in wageds (the dreaded wage/price spiral). 

On the other hand, the hedged homeowner using a fixed rate loan is immunized from reflation in housing prices, thus he is “long inflation”.  In this instance the homeowner benefits tremendously because while his wages are increasing along with everything else, his real cost of housing is shrinking.  Again this is exactly what happened in the late 70s and early 80s.

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2008-01-30 04:05 PM

Now that you mentioned it, I’ve looked at and am highly interested in 21 Upland.
This is one sweet house, an absolute trophy, and I liked it better than 1 Poway.
Only problem is the 1.299M price tag, not to mention the seller isn’t moving, at least not now.

Astute Observation by furious sugar
2008-01-30 03:58 PM

I actually lived in Terra Bella in 2001- I bought and sold an “02” unit just like the REO floor plan.  Only lived there 8 months.  It is a pretty complex on the outside-- but what they don’t show you is that most of the units (including this one) have detached garages- and you have to enter your unit thru a main hallway (florescent lighting, indoor/outdoor carpet, et all).  The “02” units start on the second floor of the bldgs- so you come in the main “hall” thru your garage and walk up a flight of stairs to your front door. 

And- the condo board at the time was run by some nutty people.

Glorified apartment if you ask me..... with nice upgrades.  We lost approx. $20K over our mistake (and I say we got out lucky!).

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2008-01-30 03:24 PM

Problem with those places is the schools.  You wanna send your kids to Beckman with ~700API?  Unless you are planning on ponying up the dough for a private school, these places seem fairly undesireable for families with school age children.

Alternatively if you are considering moving into one of the less desireable school areas and sending the kids to private school, you may consider the amount of mortgage that private school tuition could carry.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-01-30 03:21 PM

wink

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 03:18 PM

well i guess a boat is fun… but you still need to be able to pay off that loan.... the equity is vapor, the boat and loan are real

Astute Observation by No_Such_Reality
2008-01-30 03:06 PM

Recently is 10% ago.

literally that is how fast the market is deteriorating.  Something that entered escrow in late December will likely 5-10% underwater by the time they close escrow.

Look at redfin, they have plenty of competition at their price point.  There are a couple that are cheaper too.  21 Upland tilts in at a full 10%/sf cheaper.

Astute Observation by awgee
2008-01-30 03:01 PM

The same psychology that makes owning more emotionally attractive than renting reverses during a complete real estate cycle and renting becomes more attractive than owning.

Astute Observation by awgee
2008-01-30 02:58 PM

American_Screamer - I don’t know if this helps, but when my wife used to say stuff like, “All the good ones will be taken”, I replied, “The worse things get, the more good ones will come to market.”

Astute Observation by Let's go Anteaters
2008-01-30 02:54 PM

that’s the rub, incomes may well be falling as prices fall.  probably not as quickly, but it isn’t hard to visualize a nasty feedback loop between the two when one considers how real-estate dependent the socal economy is and was.

Astute Observation by Let's go Anteaters
2008-01-30 02:52 PM

that’s a bad metaphor.  a short position in equities is not a cash position.  there is no way to do a literal short sale on real estate to my knowledge - i.e., a deal where the sale comes before a purchase with the buyer pocketing the difference.  a much better equivalent to equity shorts are the ‘owners’ who successfully refied at the market peak and managed to walk away, perhaps even buying a similar property at lower levels.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 02:47 PM

$1.2M is a 2004 rollback on 1 Poway.  You are talking about a super premium property in one of the best parts of Irvine IMHO.  No way in the world they take less than $1M today.  2800sf places in NP in less desirable locations are still going for $1M+.  Take 18 Sunnyvale for instance.  In escrow now for I’m sure over $1M.  Another 2800sf on Sunnyvale closed recently for over $1M as well.

I don’t think you’ll see a sub $1M price on something like 1 Poway until 2009.  Someone will buy that puppy for $1.1-1.15M before too long and feel like they got a deal…

Astute Observation by camsavem
2008-01-30 02:23 PM

If you are a serious buyer, offer them 900 and see what they say, it never hurts to ask, you might be surprised at the counter.

Astute Observation by lawyerliz
2008-01-30 02:02 PM

Why don’t you make an offer and see what happens?

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 02:01 PM

Thanks for explaining, I understand your argument, but from a rent saver standpoint all you care about is the GRM that makes renting equivalent to buying, Today....  that varies by interest rate.

What you are describing sounds like speculation to me.... all be it, educated speculation.

Astute Observation by no_vaseline
2008-01-30 01:46 PM

Blame Prop 13.

Astute Observation by no_vaseline
2008-01-30 01:45 PM

Hey, we’re gonna be neighbors after June of ‘09 or so!

Astute Observation by no_vaseline
2008-01-30 01:41 PM

I can tell you I absolutely don’t have this problem with my wife.  But, in all fairness, she’s the smart one and I have the MBA.

Astute Observation by surfing in newport
2008-01-30 01:33 PM

The buy now because interest rates are low is a lie from realtors. If you want to get a bargain, you should buy when interest rates are high and then refinance when they go lower.

While interest rate go up and down, for 10 year and longer notes the interest rate relative to inflation stays fairly constant. If you finance with a fixed rate mortgage, you fix your house payment for the next 15-30 years. However, inflation will increase the rent for your apartment and increase the value of the house in the future. You have to compare the present value of the house after the expected number of years you will live there with the present value (cost) of all the rent payments you will be making over the same number of years.

These are long term and average trends. In the short term and for specific markets, housing prices are always determined by supply and demand. The assumption here is that the type of housing and rentals available for the market match the living style affordable by the people in the area. What I’m trying to say is that this analysis only works if people are not stretched to the limit by the payments. Under this assumption you can substitute between the amount of cash used for other investments and cash used for the housing investment. that is, the demand for housing is not constrained by the maximum payment a person can make. Obviously this is not the case right now, but at the bottom that should be the case because you will have a supply of renters that want to be homeowners.

You’ll see actual GRM’s flucuate with interest rates because interest rates are based on expected inflation and expectations can be wrong. You also have affordability issues. If interest rates spike, then all of a sudden higher priced homes become unaffordable, not because they are bad investments, but because demand dries up because fewer people can make the payments. But after several years, you will find an equilibrium with a normal GRM because empty houses/condo’s will be converted to rental units causing rental supply to increase and therefore rental prices to also drop. So, higher interest rates will cause prices to fall, but it will also cause equivalent rentals prices to drop because of the empty units.

When I talk about GRM’s, I’m referring to what I would expect them to be under normal times, not during and right after a bubble. And not right after sudden changes in interest rates.

Astute Observation by 25w100k+
2008-01-30 01:30 PM

Yeah.  The rediculous mello roos are going to keep me from places like VoC.  And 330 a squate ft?  Still too much for anywhere but Shady Canyon or TRidge.

Did anyone see this nice quail hill condo for 285 a sq ft?

I’m a little shocked.  Prices all over irvine might be in for a sharp decline sooner rather then later.

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2008-01-30 01:23 PM

Ipop,

When are we going to see similar drops in Northpark? 
I’m still waiting for the seller at 1 Poway to cut their price from 1.2M to 950K so I can scoop it up.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 01:13 PM

Damn mortgage rates have done nothing but go up since the stimulus package BS was announced.  I was so close to locking a sweet refi and rates just keep moving further and further away…

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 01:11 PM

Nah mav.  In a bull market, you can borrow against it.  It’s not vapor if if you can get a boat with it…

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 01:06 PM

isn’t home equity vapor in any market, bull or bear?

Astute Observation by Major Schadenfreude
2008-01-30 01:04 PM

“...and they are part of a larger project I am working on...”

That’s called turning lemons into lemonaide!

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 01:02 PM

surfing in newport,
explain yourself further
my understanding of GRM is that it simply compares todays rents to todays housing payments.  todays rents are fixed (more or less, fairly inelastic), while interest rates on a fixed rate mortgage can drop or go up, impacting the GRM equivalent for renting vs. buying

Astute Observation by shiny
2008-01-30 01:01 PM

IR:  I would point out that these are the advertised asking-for rents.  Everything is negotiable, including rents.  I have always negotiated my leases.  Thus, I say the actual rents these places get will be some percentage below their asking prices, just as is the case for homes for sale. 

Again, one can tout that such and such place should rent for $3200 but it is another thing entirely to actually write a non-deductible 3K rent check every month, even when you are relatively well paid.  There is a monstrous bubble in OC whose implosion will bring down a lot of things, rents included.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 12:55 PM

OMG, the mello roos alone are $6900 per year on this property and that ain’t changing no matter how low the price goes…

Even at a purchase price of $700K, the full property tax (MR’s included) on this VoC property would be $14,500 per year.  Egads what were these people thinking!

Astute Observation by Alan
2008-01-30 12:53 PM

Actually, I had renters who brought in animals that did just that.  Ended up ripping out all the carpet, the padding was rancid w animal urine.  Had to take them to small claims to recover the recarpeting costs.

Astute Observation by surfing in newport
2008-01-30 12:46 PM

But you forget, this is not an decision based on just this years payments. If interest rates are going up, it’s because the “experts” feel that inflation will be higher in the future. So, you should expect rents and housing prices to increase relative to your fixed payment. Both of which making owning a house more desirable.

Basically, it’s a wash.

It’s real interest rates that matter.

It’s real interest rates for 10 year T-bills that matter...and those actually went up today.

Astute Observation by Major Schadenfreude
2008-01-30 12:39 PM

“Equity evaporation” if you will.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-01-30 12:36 PM

Had to post this one… $125K price drop coming on this VoC bad boy.  A little capitulation action.  New list is $799K:

http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1404362

The all-in price on this house was probably about $1,050,000 in 2006.  That’s a pretty quick $275K or so gone.

Astute Observation by Major Schadenfreude
2008-01-30 12:32 PM

“Being able to whip out your **** and piss all over the carpet, walls, and kitchen: priceless.”

Actually, this goes under the plus column for renting!

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 12:32 PM

Interest rates have a big impact on monthly payments.

The GRM compares rent versus monthly payments… hence GRM varies by interest rate.

IMO..... interest rates should go up, but that does not mean they will.  Who knows what our crazy government will do.
In the short term it looks like interest rates are likely to go down.

Astute Observation by mav
2008-01-30 12:30 PM

Tim,

It’s true rents vary by neighborhood, but home prices have a much larger variance by neighborhood vs. rents.  This is due to the fact that renting is short term while buying is longer term.

Astute Observation by surfing in newport
2008-01-30 12:01 PM

Risk aversion in individuals is a complex subject. For example, in gambling (lottery, vegas, penny stocks, ...no money down financing) you find that people are risk seekers. That is, they play the game even though they know the odds are not in their favor. On the other hand, if the game can not be repeated, they turn risk averse. For example, the payout offered in Deal/No-Deal is always less than the expected payout. This is because the player only gets fewer and fewer chances at winning as the game goes on, while the bank continues to play game after game.

So what is more risky now: owning or renting?

Astute Observation by surfing in newport
2008-01-30 11:53 AM

...but the yield on 10 year T-bills is up...and that’s what mortgages track.

Astute Observation by CK
2008-01-30 11:49 AM

Right on, Skek.  Right on.

Astute Observation by John
2008-01-30 11:34 AM

1.25% rate cut in 8 days!!!
another bubble is on the corner, could it be real estae?

Astute Observation by Genius
2008-01-30 11:32 AM

Half percent cut.

I predict price declines of 85% off peak in los angeles.  Tokyo, here we come.

Astute Observation by Genius
2008-01-30 11:23 AM

You’re making me not want to get married.

Astute Observation by 25w100k+
2008-01-30 11:09 AM

Has the overall GRM for irvine EVER been at 140?  I believe I saw a chart on here that showed pre-bubble it was closer to 200.

I could be wrong though.

Also, while I DO think all those condos will come down another 10-20% (hopefully) in the next year or two, they are kind of an apples to oranges comparison.

You would really actually prefer to live here

opposed to
here?

Astute Observation by skek
2008-01-30 11:03 AM

I agree that too many on this board take a purely economic view of the own vs. rent question.  While there is nothing wrong with making the choice to rent (and lately, it has been the more financially prudent decision), some people clearly see an intangible benefit to owning that would cause a reasonable person to be willing to pay a premium over renting.

Now, whether that premium is at 160 GRM (IrvineRenter has indicated that cash flow investors are likely to get in at 100-120, so 160 already represents a premium to some extent) or higher, I don’t know.  But if I had the choice to rent or buy the exact same house as a long term residence for my family, I’d pay a premium to buy.  How much depends on the house and my personal financial situation.  Economically irrational, I know, but c’est la vie.

Astute Observation by camsavem
2008-01-30 10:56 AM

IR, thanks for the great information.....

I follow this blog but mainly I am interested in resale properties in North Tustin. I lost my job in the tech bubble after I had just purchased a property in late 2000. Not wanting to work for someone else, I sold in 01 and used the profits and equity to start my own business. My business has been succesful, but the house I sold in 01 for 475,000. shot up to almost a million dollars in three years. Needless to say we have been priced out of the market now for 7 years.

I cant tell how gratifying it is to see this market crater. I got so tired of all the talk about “the house down the street just went for”, “back up offers over asking”, “putting in a new gormet kitchen, Viking...”. It was like they would look at me and say “It must suck to be you!!!!! As they were all doing the rising equity/heloc parties because they were all so smart and bought their homes (with help from their parents) in the 90’s.

Well that talk has ended and now those homes that were fetching 900K are on the market as short sells in the 600’s and the banks are taking offers in the 500’s. My feeling is recovery is a long way off, but there are some deals to be had even now if you are willing to be patient. IMO every asking price right now is WTF, no one is getting asking price and realtors are begging for ANY offer to take to the seller weather that be a occupier or a bank. If a place is listed at 650K, offer 525, you never know.

I guess what I’m saying is I dont think making an offer now is a bad thing as long as you price in the decline. IOW, if you have a price point for a property dont be afraid to ask for it. Everyone knows there is going to be a lot more inventory comming on line here in the next six months and they want to get their propery moved. So whether they are bank owned or the owner has lots of equity, right now the name of the game is PRICE, and it is a buyers market.

Can you tell I have been a bitter renter?

Not because I have had to rent, and not because the prices went through the roof, but because of the attitudes of all the morons that taked down to me like I was an idiot and did not join the “O.C. Real Estate Party”.

Astute Observation by skek
2008-01-30 10:41 AM

and they are part of a larger project I am working on

Is IrvineRenter writing a future NYT best-seller on the rise and fall of the Orange County housing market?  I’d buy that book…

Astute Observation by NanoWest
2008-01-30 10:06 AM

I rented an irvine company property right next door to terra bella.......3 beds, 2 bath........rent is about $2350 if you want to sign a 1 year lease. The unit is 1260 sq. feet.

I cannot see paying more than about $200,000 for one of these units.....I may be out of my mind but I would just as soon rent for the rest of my life.

The GRM is an interesting concept if there is balance in the market....that is that there are a constant flow of first time buyers with a down payment large enough and DI ration large enough to purchase a home. At this point it is not clear what the supply of potential first time home buyers is...but my guess is that it pretty small.

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2008-01-30 10:04 AM

No, you are paying a premium for the call option on inflation/HPA.  It’s pretty simple.  The housing market is made up of longs are shorts.  The longs are betting that inflation will rise over the long term to a point that offsets the “call-premium” paid via ownership.  The shorts are renters who believe that same call-premium is over priced and the inflation will likely not compensate howeowners.

However not everybody is taking an explicit view on inflation.

Included with renters are those that simply don’t have the money buy, and will be lifelong renters.

Included with the long are price insensitive buyers, or place added value on the control premium afforded homeowners.

Astute Observation by American-Screamer
2008-01-30 09:53 AM

This is precisely the problem I have now...I try to convince my wife that although it appears that prices have fallen and there are good deals...the prices are still way over fundamentals.  She’s addicted to redfin and other sites constantly showing me 3/2 SFH in the low 600s built in the 80s.  I say look at the sales history and what was it going for in say 01-02 (usually 250-350, I think) and I say that’s where the prices are going.  Her response.."By the time the prices get there all the good ones will be gone.” Oy.