Donald Bren on the recovery: "No. I don't see the light."

When asked if he sees the light at the end of the economic tunnel, Donald Bren replied, “No. I don't see the light.”

Irvine Home Address … 69 CARTIER AISLE Irvine, CA 92620

Resale Home Price …… $400,000

I never cared much for moonlit skies

I never wink back at fireflies

But now that the stars are in your eyes

I'm beginning to see the light

Ella Fitzgerald

While the Irvine Company touts their bold building plans as a beacon of hope for a recovery in the real estate market, Donald Bren, the chairman of the Irvine Company isn't quite so optimistic.

Irvine Co.'s Bren plans for slow recovery

Published: Oct. 28, 2011 Updated: Oct. 31, 2011 7:20 a.m.

By JONATHAN LANSNER

COLUMNIST

THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

jlansner@ocregister.com

“No. I don't see the light.”

That's how arguably the most successful American real estate developer – Donald Bren of the Irvine Co. – answers the “Do you see the light at the end of the tunnel” question about the overall economic outlook.

Bren, 79, was honored last week by the Urban Land Institute trade group with its new Vanguard Award for a career of cutting-edge real estate planning and development. The billionaire – ranked No. 26 on Forbes' list of America's wealthiest with an estimated $12 billion fortune – sat down with The Orange County Register to discuss his business success and the economic outlook.

He described an overall national economy in deep distress. To Bren, the business climate suffers from both a lack of leadership – a slowly reacting government and skittish business leaders – plus limited financing that only provides fresh funds to the lowest-risk individuals and companies.

We've all been into it for five, six years,” Bren says in an exasperated tone that symbolizes the frustrations of most Americans – business icons as well as modest individuals – at the slow pace of the rebound from the Great Recession of last decade.

Bren and the Irvine Company embraced the false rally of 2009. I think they were genuinely surprised when it fizzled out. Their plans were clearly to build on momentum from the false bottom in 2009 with a large production run in 2010 extending into 2011 and beyond. When the props were removed from the market and the underlying problems frequently discussed here surfaced, I don't think they anticipated it. Empty developments like Orchard Hills and half-dead developments like Portola Springs speak to this reality.

Bren's own businesses are seemingly faring far better than the lethargic regional and national economy. The owner of the large, private development company kept most of his finances out of the discussion at a conference room overlooking the Pacific at his company's Newport Beach headquarters. He did mention that the company has been profitable each year throughout the downturn. Plus, the company's grade A credit rating remains intact – a rarity for real estate enterprises. That financial resolve has allowed the Irvine Co. to finance its recent growth spurt, in part, through business lines of credit.

Bren has been conservative in his use of debt which is part of his success. Most real estate entrepreneurs lever up to the max and roll the dice. If they win, they win big, but if they lose, they completely crap out and lose everything. When I look at the Irvine Company's holdings what impresses me the most is the wide variety of blue-chip cashflow properties they have developed and acquired. Their biggest hurdle is figuring out how to invest all the excess cash they have coming in.

It's no secret that construction is in a horrific slump nationwide. But look around Bren's land holdings and you'll see a rarity: extensive building of new homes, apartments – and even an office tower at Fashion Island.

This activity isn't any wild bet. It's largely the result of Bren's basic business mantra: “We can't predict, but we can plan.”

Based on how heavily they bet on the bear rally, I would agree: they can't predict.

He's leveraged the long-running homebuying appeal of Irvine – plus tax incentives for buyers in 2009 and 2010 – to get an early jump on a new homes rebound, selling 1,722 residences in north Irvine since the start of 2010. That's almost triple the budgeted pace.

That sounds great, but they were touting they sold 1,350 in 2010, so tha puts them on a pace to sell less than 400 in 2011.

His extensive apartment portfolio is nearly full with tenants, so he's aggressively adding new complexes in Irvine – plus in Silicon Valley. And he's constructing a new office tower around the bend from Irvine Co. headquarters only after he signed a world-class tenant to occupy the building: money management giant Pimco.

But Bren admits his overall business hasn't grown this year as fast as hoped. Rentals of his office space, for example, may be on the upswing – but the rents tenants will pay aren't acting in tandem. Then again, shopping increases at his malls are a pleasant surprise.

“What we do is plan, then make adjustments,” Bren says.

SIMPLE PLANS

What you don't get from Bren – in watching him accept the ULI award or in an hour's interview, at least – is as much bravado as you'd expect from a guy who's survived four-plus decades of vicious real estate cycles and emerged with America's largest real estate fortune.

He heaps praise on members of his executive team, as well as William Pereira, who authored the original Irvine master plan. Plus, he cites old-school real estate logic – “Location, location, location” – because he's owned land in a great spot.

Bren's humility is admirable. The man's genius is apparent in how me managed to add 30%-50% to the value of the land he purchased through good planning and a commitment to quality. He could have amassed a fortune building out the Irvine Ranch as a run-of-the-mill subdivision, but he aspired for something greater, and he succeeded in creating it.

Bren notes that geography tells one a lot about economic opportunity these days. Especially, when he speaks of what he calls “two Californias.”

His analysis essentially divides the state, down the middle, west to east. (He mentions this confused East Coast financial types, who tend to think of north-south divides. And it bemuses Bren that major financial players have yet to figure out a state that Bren boasts has the eighth largest economy in the world.)

Bren's “two Californias” comprise a reviving, even “vibrant” collection of coastal metropolitan areas – with 100,000 jobs added in a year, by his math. That's in harsh contrast to California's inland areas that are “devastated, maybe as bad as Nevada.”

I guess he won't be picking up any cashflow properties in Las Vegas….

The state hot spot, in Bren's eyes, is clearly Silicon Valley. There, he says, some of this era's greatest artists – and Bren is a student of art – are creating innovative new products and services. Not to mention creating jobs and a thriving regional economy.

The industrial art discussion leads to brief talk about the late Steve Jobs of Apple fame. Bren says he'll soon be diving into a new biography of the technology visionary, part of what he's said is a lifelong pursuit of understanding other business giants' wisdom.

As for the state as whole, Bren's a touch optimistic, saying the trend line is “positive … barely.” California's economy, “has been jolted,” Bren says, and clearly the recovery is at a pace “not what we're used to.”

Without rising house prices and the associated Ponzi borrowing, the California economy will continue to suffer.

He knows too well that economic challenges abound in the state. Still, there's this coastal rebound and a continued influx of new residents.

“People do leave, to Texas and places,” a tiny dig at critics who use the Lone Star State as an economic example. “But that's just a small part.”

QUIET CRITIC

In part of the ULI award ceremony in Los Angeles on Thursday, Bren expressed his great frustration with land-management bureaucracy.

He bemoaned the fact that it's unlikely that we'll see more major master-planned communities like Mission Viejo and Irvine that he helped create. Current regulations, he fears, would make it too difficult. He noted it took a 28-year battle with California's Coastal Commission to win approval for resorts and homes at Newport Coast.

He is probably right. The era of the large master-planned community is probably over. For starters it's too difficult to assemble a large enough parcel of land unless you go way out in the hinterlands, and with the perpetual tightening of regulations, it's far too difficult to develop over multi-decade timeframes.

Yet he's not in the all-regulation-is-bad camp. When he talks about what got the nation into its economic mess – particularly housing – and what might get it out of its funk, Bren bluntly notes government's role. In the middle of last decade, it was obvious to Bren that the mortgage process was being abused by everyone from borrowers to mortgage makers to Wall Street that was reselling the loan to investors. Shoddy loan-making eventually killed real estate.

While it may have been obvious, he didn't mind taking advantage of the morass to sell overpriced homes.

Post collapse, Bren is pained that the government isn't more effective in helping real estate rebound. In housing, for example, a new move by the Obama administration to give refinancing help to troubled homeowners may help, but Bren doesn't think it will be enough. And Bren says calls from some political and economic circles to force more foreclosures and “cleanse” the housing market will only lead to another disaster.

Government help, he says, “has to go further … it has to go beyond normal.

Bren knows the value of his holdings is quite volatile depending on the resale value of houses he can build on his land. Raw land is a very leveraged asset due to the way residual value winds up in the land. When prices go up, most construction costs are fixed, so the price increase becomes profit. Unfortunately, when prices go down, the reverse is true. (See Valuation of Lots and Raw Land). His comments seem self serving, and they probably are.

Much of Bren's criticisms are subtle, polite – and worth noting.

Yes, a crazed mortgage market – with many to blame – created the real estate debacle. But Bren says homebuilders didn't help their cause by continuing to sell “50-year-old designs.”

The Irvine Co.'s recent house selling success has been tied to novel designs that eliminated lightly used formal dining and living rooms, traded for large great rooms that tied into small-yet-functional patios. As is expected from Bren, these new designs were hatched only after two years of extensive consumer research.

The Irvine Company has really been touting these “innovative floorplans.” I like them, but they only real innovation I see is they managed to create a functional space they could build for $50/SF so they could make greater profits at lower price points.

And Bren is clearly no fan of Wall Street, saying that the Irvine Co.'s private ownership is a tactical advantage. He thinks the fickle, short-term demands of Wall Street investors mess with the long-term nature of solid real estate strategy. And Bren knows: Two decades ago, he briefly ran his apartments business with public ownership.

In discussing the failures of other master-planned communities, he explains that juggling real estate planning plus quarterly profit goals – not to mention bankers' demands on land-purchase mortgages – zaps a key trait required of the successful developer: “Patience.”

You know, having that vision thing.

He is undoubtedly right. Wall Street demands short-term performance at the expense of creating long-term value. Bren is expert at creating long-term value, but his plans may never have come to pass if he had tied in with Wall Street money.

Bren's accountants wince that he chose to give away more than half of his Irvine Ranch to open space – and swatch of raw property five times the size of original plans. Sure, part of that was philanthropy and legacy building. Though, establishing surrounding parkland also creates a tangible asset sold to folks considering Irvine housing vs. some of the wall-to-wall development on hills and valleys seen in other parts of his region.

It was also likely a condition of his approvals that he donate open space. Plus, most of the open space he donated was undevelopable anyway.

“Looking back 100 years, we'll see the open space is the most important feature of Irvine,” Bren says. Then he adds, “And the university” – UC Irvine that sits on land Bren donated to the state.

Donating the university was one his best decisions. Having a university in town brings a more educated and higher paid workforce to pay for his houses. The university added much more value to his land than it ever cost him.

And Bren probably didn't have to heavily design everything from his strip malls to his luxury resort to make a buck. But the art historian in Bren wants a product with a lasting look.

Bren didn't directly answer a question seeking his favorite slice of his development career. Yet he took great pride in discussing the pool at the Pelican Hill Resort. He noted fine details, such as its lining of 1 million tiles. And that the pool is visually framed by a series of columns inspired by the Roman-era architectural writing of Marcus Vitruvius.

“Two thousand years old,” says Bren of Vitruvius' logic, “And still valid today.”

Despite the criticism of Irvine as banal, Bren did create a beautiful community with architecture that will stand the test of time. As with any architecture, it will be dated, but the quality is there, and the dated look will be part of the desired style.

I would also note that not all the looks created have proven timeless and popular. I personally felt the commercial center at Culver and Walnut was ugly, and Bren must have felt the same because it was just redone with a completely different architectural feel.

Ah, longevity. Think what you want about Donald Bren's empire. Nevertheless, remember that not only is he still in business – no small feat, in itself – his company is actively expanding.

He's clearly on the list of business leaders putting big dollars on the line today. And, sadly, that list is a short one.

Contact the writer: jlansner@ocregister.com or 949-777-6727

That was a good report. Kudos to Mr. Lansner.

Larry Roberts is hosting a Las Vegas cashflow properties presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: Las Vegas cashflow property – Intercap Lending

Bought at the peak but still got $100K

The owner of today's featured property bought in mid 2005 with 100% financing, and still managed to extract an additional $100K next year before the market imploded. Not a bad deal. He puts nothing down, gets to live in a property for a year, and the property provides him with $100,000 in spending money. I want one of those too.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

This property is available for sale via the MLS.

Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707

949.769.1599

sales@idealhomebrokers.com

Irvine House Address … 69 CARTIER AISLE Irvine, CA 92620

Resale House Price …… $400,000

Beds: 3

Baths: 2

Sq. Ft.: 1593

$251/SF

Property Type: Residential, Condominium

Style: Two Level, Mediterranean

Year Built: 1989

Community: Northwood

County: Orange

MLS#: U11004470

Source: SoCalMLS

Status: Active

On Redfin: 5 days

——————————————————————————

WELCOME HOME TO THE CITY OF IRVINE AND TO ONE OF THE VERY BEST CITIES IN ORANGE COUNTY. THIS IS A CONDOMINIUM THAT LIVES LIKE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME. LOCATED IN THE SOUGHT AFTER AREA OF NORTHWOODS IN THE COMMUNITY OF NORTHWOOD VILLAS. THE PROPERTY FEATURES THREE BEDROOMS, AND TWO BATHROOMS, WITH CLOSE TO 1,593 SQUARE FEET OF INTERIOR LIVING SPACE THAT MAY BE JUST THE RIGHT SIZE FOR YOUR ACTIVE LIFESTYLE. YOU ARE PART OF AN ASSOCIATION THAT CREATES THE FEELING OF BEING ON VACATION IN AN EXCLUSIVE RESORT. YOU WILL ENJOY THE ASSOCIATION POOL, SPA, AND COMMON AREAS. THE LOCATION IS FANTASTIC YOU ARE CLOSE TO ALL THE GREAT THINGS IN IRVINE; PARKS, SCHOOLS, RECREATION, TRANSPORTATION AND SO MUCH MORE. SO COME HOME TO IRVINE, AND START TO LIVE THE ORANGE COUNTY LIFESTYLE TODAY.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

Proprietary IHB commentary and analysis

Resale Home Price …… $400,000

House Purchase Price … $549,000

House Purchase Date …. 5/23/2005

Net Gain (Loss) ………. ($173,000)

Percent Change ………. -31.5%

Annual Appreciation … -4.8%

Cost of Home Ownership

————————————————-

$400,000 ………. Asking Price

$14,000 ………. 3.5% Down FHA Financing

4.18% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$386,000 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$112,142 ………. Income Requirement

$1,883 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$347 ………. Property Tax (@1.04%)

$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$83 ………. Homeowners Insurance (@ 0.25%)

$444 ………. Private Mortgage Insurance

$140 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$2,897 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$296 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$539 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment (Amortization)

$21 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$70 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$2,153 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$4,000 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$4,000 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$3,860 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$14,000 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$25,860 ………. Total Cash Costs

$33,000 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$58,860 ………. Total Savings Needed

——————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Larry Roberts and Shevy Akason are hosting an OC housing market presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: OC Housing Market – Intercap Lending.

Government-backed loan limits may go back up

The Senate passed a measure that would increase the loan limits on federally guranteed loans back to $729,750. Now it's up to the House of Representatives to decide.

Irvine Home Address … 50 EAGLE Pt Irvine, CA 92604

Resale Home Price …… $285,000

A circumstance beyond our control, oh oh oh oh

The phone, the tv and the news of the world

Got in the house like a pigeon from hell, oh oh oh oh

Threw sand in our eyes and descended like flies

Put us back on the train

Oh, back on the chain gang

Pretenders — Back on the Chain Gang

Every time politicians do the right thing and allow the housing market to wean itself off subsidies, pressures from loan owners prompts them to change their minds. We're being put back on the train leading to temporary market supports which merely delay the recovery.

In the latest dumb move from Washington, the Senate passed a bill which would raise the federally guaranteed loan limits back to $729,750. Apparently, private money is too expensive and somewhat risk adverse — as they should be — so lenders and loan owners are turning to the government to assume this risk and pay for the inevitable losses.

Right now, it's up to the House of Representatives to decide if they want to act on the Senate bill. It faces an uphill battle in the Republican House — thankfully. I suspect it will not pass.

Donovan on Loan Limits: Let’s ‘See What the House Decides’

By Alan Zibel — November 2, 2011, 4:03 PM ET

When it comes to dealing with Congress, the White House’s latest slogan is, “We can’t wait.”

But when it comes to lifting federal mortgage caps, the message seems to be, “You decide.”

Back in February, the Obama administration called for a decline in the maximum size of government-backed home loans as a way to start drawing back federal support for the nation’s mortgage market. They dropped on schedule on Oct. 1 but now a movement is afoot to revive the higher limits to support the ailing housing market.

Obama showed the courage to do the right thing despite pressures from the extreme left. He lacks the courage to say no to this bill, and he is hoping the Republicans in the House will kill it and take the heat for him.

Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan said in an interview Wednesday that while administration officials want to reduce the government’s support of the housing market “in the long run,” they also understand the need to support a weak part of the economy.

I wish I understood the need to support a weak part of the economy. It makes no sense to me at all. The housing market will support itself once prices find their natural bottom and the toxic debt is replaces with stable loans with much smaller balances and payments.

“We have to make sure that we’re taking these steps in concert with what’s happening in the market and ensuring that we’re supporting recovery,” in housing, Donovan said. “Obviously that’s the debate that Congress is having… Honestly, we’ll have to see what the House decides. We haven’t weighed in on it…I don’t think this changes the long-term view that we have” about reducing government support for housing.

Obama is trying to steer clear of this issue to avoid angering his left-wing base, but he clearly does not want to see this loan limit raised again, or he would openly support this measure.

Lobbyists for real-estate agents and other housing and mortgage industry groups are pushing on Capitol Hill to restore higher limits on the maximum size of home mortgages that can be guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration.

They argue that the housing market is too weak for the U.S. government to withdraw its support for more expensive loans. The loan limits fell to $625,500 on Oct. 1 in expensive markets such as New York and San Francisco from $729,750. A spending bill passed by the Senate earlier this week would lift those limits until the end of 2013.

The NAr is wining and dining politicians to restore supports which they incorrectly believe are good for their incomes. Realtors would be much better served by allowing the market to clear. Transaction volumes would rise, and despite the lower prices, realtors would generate more commissions and make more money. They are arguing against what is in their own best interest, but they are too ignorant eo see it.

In the House, the issue of raising loan limits has emerged as a point of contention among Republicans, and one that puts House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) in an awkward position.

Mr. Boehner is under conflicting pressures on the issue. Republicans in high-cost areas such as California and New York want to lift the limits. Others such as Rep. Scott Garrett (R., N.J.) and Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R., Texas) argue that raising the loan limits is equivalent to endorsing the unpopular and expensive bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Any increase in the conforming limit will increase the losses at the GSEs and will serve as a bailout to the banks. When the conforming limit was high, banks could offload their toxic crap through purchase or refinance to the GSEs. Once the conforming limit dropped, banks were stuck with their remaining bad loans.

In February, the administration endorsed allowing the loan limits expire on schedule. And at an event in June, Bob Ryan, a top HUD housing policy adviser, said allowing the loan limits to drop would be a “reasonably modest pullback.”

However, the housing market and the broader economy are in a weaker state than economists expected at the start of the year.

Noted housing-market experts such as Ivy Zelman, chief executive of Zelman & Associates, and Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, have said it was a mistake to let the limits drop.

Lawmakers adopted the higher limits in 2008 after private lenders pulled back from making “jumbo” loans, which are loans above the federal mortgage caps.

I haven't read where Ivy Zelman said dropping the conforming limit was a mistake. It clearly was not a mistake. It quite predictably lowered high end prices and contributed to the ongoing weakness in the housing market. What people fail to recognize is that this price correction is a necessary and health-restoring process the market must go through.

Larry Roberts and Shevy Akason are hosting an OC housing market presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: OC Housing Market – Intercap Lending.

2002 rollback

The asking price of today's featured proeprty is just above its 2002 purchase price. When commissions and negotiating room is factored in, this will be a 2002 rollback.

  • The owner paid $270,000 on 9/26/2002 using a $216,000 first mortgage and a $54,000 down payment. She went Ponzi shortly thereafter.
  • On 6/16/2003 she borrowed $221,000 with a new first mortgage.
  • On 5/9/2005 she obtained a $105,000 stand-alone second.
  • On 1/13/2006 she finished with a $200,000 HELOC.
  • Total property debt is $421,000.
  • Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $$205,000. She nearly doubled her mortgage debt in three and one-half years.

All the Ponzis will be flushed from the system before the crash is over. Each of them crossed the Ponzi threshold and became dependant upon mortgage equity withdrawal to make ends meet. Now that lenders aren't giving out free money, these loan owners cannot make ends meet and cannot afford their houses.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

This property is available for sale via the MLS.

Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707

949.769.1599

sales@idealhomebrokers.com

Irvine House Address … 50 EAGLE Pt Irvine, CA 92604

Resale House Price …… $285,000

Beds: 3

Baths: 2

Sq. Ft.: 1135

$251/SF

Property Type: Residential, Condominium

Style: Two Level, Contemporary

Year Built: 1978

Community: Woodbridge

County: Orange

MLS#: Y1106555

Source: SoCalMLS

Status: Active

On Redfin: 2 days

——————————————————————————

FIRST FLOOR. THIS CONDO HAS AN EXTRA BATHROOM. TITLE FLOORS. GREAT WOODBRIDGE COMMUNITY. WALKING DISTANCE TO THE LAKE. CLOSE TO FYW 5 and 405. IT HAS A NICE SIZE PATIO. THIS IS A SHORT SALE PROBATE.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

Proprietary IHB commentary and analysis

Resale Home Price …… $285,000

House Purchase Price … $270,000

House Purchase Date …. 9/26/2002

Net Gain (Loss) ………. ($2,100)

Percent Change ………. -0.8%

Annual Appreciation … 0.6%

Cost of Home Ownership

————————————————-

$285,000 ………. Asking Price

$9,975 ………. 3.5% Down FHA Financing

4.18% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$275,025 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$90,633 ………. Income Requirement

$1,342 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$247 ………. Property Tax (@1.04%)

$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$59 ………. Homeowners Insurance (@ 0.25%)

$316 ………. Private Mortgage Insurance

$377 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$2,341 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$211 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$384 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment (Amortization)

$15 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$56 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$1,817 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$2,850 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$2,850 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$2,750 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$9,975 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$18,425 ………. Total Cash Costs

$27,800 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$46,225 ………. Total Savings Needed

——————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Larry Roberts is hosting a Las Vegas cashflow properties presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: Las Vegas cashflow property – Intercap Lending.

IHB Presentations 6:30 PM and 8:00 PM Wednesday, November 9, Intercap Lending Offices

November's presentations have been moved

Due to competing demands from holiday parties, we have decided to move the November and December presentations to the classroom at the offices of Intercap Lending.

Larry Roberts is hosting a Las Vegas cashflow properties presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: Las Vegas cashflow property – Intercap Lending

Larry Roberts and Shevy Akason are hosting an OC housing market presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: OC Housing Market – Intercap Lending

Housing bubble causes mobility to fall to record low

The weak economy and crashing house prices has left many trapped in their homes unable to move.

Irvine Home Address … 40 ATHERTON Irvine, CA 92620

Resale Home Price …… $423,000

I'm holding you captive

(You can't be released)

Captive, holding you captive

(I won't let you go)

Holding you captive, you captive

(You leave?)

Holding you captive, captive

(The answer is no)

Chris Brown — Captive

Americans are captives in their own homes. The economic malaise and the abundance of underwater loan owners has immobilized our country. The mobility rate has recently fallen to its lowest reading every recording — and records go back as far as 1948.

Mobility falls to record low as Americans stay put

Published October 27, 2011

WASHINGTON – Yet another symptom of the economic downturn: Americans aren't moving.

Young adults are staying put, often with their parents. Older people aren't able to retire to beachfront or lakeside homes.

And loan owners are trapped underwater in the bank's house. Underwater borrowers are the root of population immobility.

U.S. mobility is at its lowest point since World War II.

New information from the Census Bureau highlights the continuing impact of the housing bust and unemployment on U.S. migration, after earlier signs that mobility was back on the upswing. It's a shift from America's long-standing cultural image of ever-changing frontiers, dating to the westward migration of the 1800s and more recently in the spreading out of whites, blacks and Hispanics in the Sun Belt's housing boom.

Rather than housing magnets such as Arizona, Florida and Nevada, it is now more traditional, densely populated states — California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York and New Jersey — that are showing some of the biggest population gains in the recent economic slump, according to the data released Thursday.

Residents have been largely locked in place. Families are stuck in devalued homes and young adults are living with parents or staying put in the towns where they went to college.

Population mobility has always been a key aspect of American society. People can more freely and easily move from state to state to take a better job or start a business. Without population mobility, America does not get the most value from its workforce creating a drag on the economy.

“The fact that mobility is crashing is something that I think is quite devastating,” said Richard Florida, an American urban theorist and professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management. He described America's residential movement as an important element of its economic resilience and history, from development of the nation's farmland in the Midwest to its coastal ports and homesteading in the West.

“The latest decline shows we are in a long-run economic reset and that we never really recovered — we've just been stagnating along,” Florida said.

There are other reasons than mobility that are contributing to our economic stagnation. The huge mortgage debt overhang which drains our economic resources and dampens household buying power is the real culprit. This debilitating debt also causes much of the social immobility.

About 11.6 percent of the nation's population, or 35.1 million, moved to a new home in the past year, down from 12.5 percent in the previous year. The current level of low mobility comes after the recession technically ended in mid-2009, beating a previous low of 11.9 percent in 2008.

It is the lowest in the 60-plus years that the Census Bureau has tracked information on moves, dating to 1948.

The share of people moving has been declining for decades, due in part to increases in two-income families that are more tied down by jobs and to an aging population that is less mobile. The peak for U.S. mobility came in 1951, when it hit 21.2 percent. The rate had leveled off at around 13 percent before falling off notably in 2008 during the recession.

Among young adults 25 to 29, the most mobile age group, moves fell to 24.1 percent from 25.9 percent in the previous year.

Longer-distance moves, typically for those seeking new careers in other regions of the country, remained largely flat at 3.4 percent.

The biggest drop-off occurred in local moves, down to 15.4 percent from 17.7 percent in 2010. It's a sign that young adults in the prolonged slump weren't even willing to venture outside their counties, continuing instead to live with relatives or on college campuses.

People most often cite a desire to live in a new home as the main reason for moving, as well as reasons of family or economy such as marriage or a new job. But analysts say with many young adults delaying marriage while struggling to find employment and aging baby boomers expressing financial worries about retirement, the current mobility freeze could continue for several more years.

There is no reason to think the problems with mobility will go away until we deal with the issues of underwater loan owners and excessive mortgage debt. Foreclosures and short sales are the way ahead.

An Associated Press-LifeGoesStrong.com poll this month found that more than half of baby boomers born between 1946 and 1964 say they are unlikely to move somewhere new in retirement; about 4 in 10 say they are very likely to stay in their current home throughout all of their retirement.

The annual growth of retirement-destination counties, typically in Sun Belt states such as Florida, Arizona and New Mexico, has fallen sharply since the recession that began in late 2007. It's down nearly half compared with the period 2000-2007, according to recent census data.

I think Nevada and Arizona will see a resurgence in retirees moving in over the next several years. The baby boomers are just starting to retire, and house prices in Nevada and Arizona are relatively cheap.

As I mentioned in a previous post, my parents have purchased three homes so far in Las Vegas. One is going to be empty half the time as they split between their Florida home and the one in Las Vegas. The other two homes are investment properties which provide enough excess cashflow to cover the expenses of the one they use half the year. Basically, a retiree with $50,000 and the willingness to own rental properties can obtain a modest primary residence with no monthly costs. It's a sweet deal that won't go unnoticed by other retirees.

In all, the mid-decade housing boom and subsequent bust took a toll on virtually all age and race groups.

Homeownership declined in 47 states and the District of Columbia while the national ownership rate fell by its largest amount since the 1930s. Hispanics who moved and purchased homes in new destinations in the Southeast were hit especially hard, with bigger drops in average income and increases in poverty after low-wage construction jobs dried up in states such as South Carolina, North Carolina, Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee.

In contrast, middle-class blacks from the North who migrated to Southern states such as Georgia, Florida and Texas fared better, maintaining higher incomes than African-Americans who remained in declining industrial centers such as Michigan and Ohio.

Other bright spots in the housing bust included urban, high-tech college meccas that are proving to be a draw for young, college-educated adults of all races and ethnicities.

The data covering 2008-2010 show that Raleigh, N.C.; the Texas cities of Austin, San Antonio and Houston; Denver; Pittsburgh; and Baltimore and Washington, D.C., had some of the biggest gains in residents. All of them tend to promise specialized tech jobs and hip lifestyles.

Pittsburgh is hip now?

William H. Frey, a Brookings Institution demographer who reviewed the education and race data, said many of these cities will continue to attract new residents after the economy fully recovers. He said other cities must seek ways to diversify their industries, draw new investment and build partnerships with local universities to attract young talent, much like Pittsburgh has been striving to do after the collapse of its steel industry.

“Right now, the 'cool' cities are serving as way stations for the small number of adventurous young people who are willing to move in a down economy. But when the broader economy picks up, a much larger group of people will move to wherever the jobs spring up,” Frey said, noting that people are staying put for now because they have to, not because they want to.

“We are now just in a lull, albeit a hyperextended one,” he said.

Other findings:

— Texas posted increases in average income across all race groups even after the housing bust. The District of Columbia had the biggest overall gain in average income between 2005-2007 and 2008-2010 time periods, increasing 9 percent to nearly $60,000. Thirty-six states had declines.

— The district, New York, Connecticut, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, Alabama and California have levels of income inequality that rise above the national average. Broken down by large metropolitan areas, New York City, Miami, Los Angeles, Houston, Memphis, Tenn., New Orleans, San Francisco, and Birmingham, Ala., each had wider-than-average gaps between rich and poor.

— Across smaller areas of geography, Fountainhead-Orchard Hills, Md., just north of Hagerstown, had the greatest measured income inequality. Country Knolls, N.Y., near Albany, registered the least.

— Suburban and rural homeowners were more likely to stay put than others. Some 93.5 percent of the suburban and 93.7 percent of the rural population in owner-occupied units are residing in the same house as one year ago, up from the 2005-2007 time period, according to Kenneth Johnson, senior demographer at the University of New Hampshire.

Renters were more mobile: Overall, 68.8 percent lived in the same rental unit one year ago.

Besides not losing hundreds of thousands of dollars, being a renter for the last ten years has given me the freedom to move wherever and whenever I wished.

John R. Logan, a sociology professor at Brown University, described consequences for mostly minorities should U.S. mobility stay frozen for extended periods. His research on neighborhood segregation has found that the average black or Hispanic household earning over $75,000 lives in a poorer neighborhood than the average white resident earning under $40,000.

“Being locked into place has its most severe effects on blacks and Hispanics, who are often segregated into disadvantaged neighborhoods regardless of their own incomes,” he said. “Many middle-class homeowners in these neighborhoods have lost home equity, making it harder to move to communities with better schools and safer streets. Even the slow decline in black-white segregation that we've seen in the last 20 years will be hard to maintain under these conditions.”

The lack of mobility kills the move up market. It's not that people are moving shorter distances, it's that they are not moving at all.

The census findings were based on the Current Population Survey as of March 2011, as well as comparisons of the 2005-2007 and the 2008-2010 American Community Survey to provide a snapshot of every U.S. community with at least 20,000 residents. Figures on income inequality come from a census analysis of survey data from 2005-2009.

A few weeks ago, I noted that an entire generation is trapped in their starter homes. This is a big problem, and it will be with us for a long time.

She went Ponzi

The owner of today's featured property bought near the end of the last housing recession on 11/17/1998. She paid $226,000 using a $180,800 first mortgage and a $45,200 down payment. It didn't take her long to start making withdrawals.

  • On 12/7/1999 she obtained a stand-alone second for $50,000.
  • On 7/9/2001 she refinanced with a $251,500 first mortgage.
  • On 11/21/2002 she refinanced with a $269,160 first mortgage.
  • On 7/28/2003 she refinanced with a $285,000 first mortgage.
  • On 4/19/2004 she obtained a $60,000 stand-alone second.
  • On 4/29/2005 she got a $90,000 stand-alone second.
  • On 4/20/2005 she refinanced with a $388,000 first mortgage.
  • On 8/22/2006 she refinanced one last time with a $564,000 first mortgage.
  • Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $383,200.
  • Total squatting time is more than a year so far.

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 04/25/2011

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 01/18/2011

Document Type: Notice of Default

This woman pissed away nearly $400,000. The shocking part is how ordinary she seems. I have profiled many larger cases, and despite how obvious it was that this woman had gone Ponzi, her lenders didn't seem to care. After profiling nearly a thousand of these cases, $400,000 in mortgage equity withdrawal hardly registers. It doesn't even earn my half-million dollar club graphic. No, this is an ordinary borrower living an ordinary Irvine life. That's what's so shocking.

Larry Roberts is hosting a Las Vegas cashflow properties presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: Las Vegas cashflow property – Intercap Lending

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

This property is available for sale via the MLS.

Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707

949.769.1599

sales@idealhomebrokers.com

Irvine House Address … 40 ATHERTON Irvine, CA 92620

Resale House Price …… $423,000

Beds: 3

Baths: 2

Sq. Ft.: 1668

$254/SF

Property Type: Residential, Single Family

Style: Two Level, Cape Cod

View: Park/Green Belt, Trees/Woods, Faces South

Year Built: 1980

Community: Northwood

County: Orange

MLS#: S677776

Source: SoCalMLS

On Redfin: 3 days

——————————————————————————

Charming 3 Bedroom Townhome Located In The Desirable Sheffield Manor Community. Light & Bright Floor Plan Features Laminate Wood Flooring, Vinyl Slider, Custom Baseboards, 6 Panel Doors, Plantation Shutters, Ceiling Fans & Mirrored Wardrobes. Upgraded Kitchen Includes Granite Enhanced Counters, Stainless Steel Appliances, Breakfast Counter Bar & Garden Window Overlooking The Private Patio Area. Large Master Bedroom Suite With Raised Ceiling, Greenbelt Views & An Upgraded Bath With Granite, Travertine Tile & Shower. Wonderful Association Amenities & Steps To Award Winning Elementary & Middle Schools. Centrally Located Near Walking Trails, Restaurants & Shopping. Low HOA Dues & No Mello Roos

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

Proprietary IHB commentary and analysis

Resale Home Price …… $423,000

House Purchase Price … $226,000

House Purchase Date …. 11/18/1998

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $171,620

Percent Change ………. 75.9%

Annual Appreciation … 4.9%

Cost of Home Ownership

————————————————-

$423,000 ………. Asking Price

$14,805 ………. 3.5% Down FHA Financing

4.18% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$408,195 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$121,375 ………. Income Requirement

$1,991 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$367 ………. Property Tax (@1.04%)

$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$88 ………. Homeowners Insurance (@ 0.25%)

$469 ………. Private Mortgage Insurance

$220 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$3,136 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$313 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$570 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment (Amortization)

$22 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$73 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$2,348 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$4,230 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$4,230 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$4,082 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$14,805 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$27,347 ………. Total Cash Costs

$35,900 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$63,247 ………. Total Savings Needed

——————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Larry Roberts and Shevy Akason are hosting an OC housing market presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: OC Housing Market – Intercap Lending.

North Korea towers to Shanghai towers: a tale of two bubbles

The indelible symbols of the housing bubble are the empty towers left in its wake. We have them here in Orange County, and the Chinese have them in every major city.

North Korea at NightMarquee at Park Place at Night

Irvine Home Address … 3131 MICHELSON Dr #507 Irvine, CA 92612

Resale Home Price …… $390,000

If you feel so empty

So used up so let down

If you feel so angry

So ripped off so stepped on

You're not the only one

Refusing to back down

You're not the only one

So get up

Let's start a riot, a riot

Let's start a riot

Let's start a riot, a riot

Let's start a riot

Three Days Grace — Let's Start a Riot

The Chinese have long known they have a problem with real estate values. Over the last several years, the Chinese government has enacted a series of half-hearted policies aimed to slow the increase in real estate prices. Unfortunately, the Chinese housing bubble is a runaway freight train heading for an awful crash.

Shanghai Homeowners Smash Showroom in Protest Over Falling Prices

October 25, 2011, 4:17 PM HKT

A weekend scuffle in Shanghai over a drop in apartment prices adds to increasing evidence that China’s efforts to tame a surging property market are having an impact – even as it offers a hint of what could happen if the measures go too far.

A group of around 400 homeowners in Shanghai demonstrated publicly and damaged a showroom operated by their property developer after the company said it cut prices. Home buyers had wanted to speak with the developer to refund or cancel their contracts but were unsuccessful, according to local media. One report said the price cuts exceeded 25% per square meter.

Can you imagine? These people are on the verge of rioting over a small decline in prices — at least it's small compared to what is coming.

I remember the fervor over rising house prices here and the hostility people exhibited at the mere suggestion that prices might go down. I had to blog anonymously for the first 18 months I wrote for this blog for fear of what the crazies might do. Given the behavior of these protestors in China ransacking a showroom, it appears my fears were well founded. When people realize they bought a steaming pile of crap rather than a pot of gold, they get pretty upset.

The local media reports said an unspecified number of people were injured. The property developer, a unit of China Overseas Holdings Ltd., didn’t respond to requests for comment. Photos of the event showed broken glass in the sales office, homeowners marching with banners and a phalanx of police watching over.

Chinese media separately reported that another group of Shanghai homeowners gathered on Saturday to speak with Longfor Properties Co., after it dropped asking prices to 14,000 yuan per square meter from 18,000 yuan per square meter at a residential development in the city’s Jiading district. Longfor didn’t return calls for comment. In an Oct. 20 release, it said it posted stellar sales following an aggressive sales strategy for three of its projects in Shanghai and in the city of Hangzhou.

It's time to line up the bagholders. Anyone who buys now in China will watch their investment turn to garbage overnight.

Beijing has been tightening control of the property market this year to tame surging property prices, amid fears that unaffordable housing could lead to greater social unrest. Measures include a massive 1.3 trillion yuan program to build about 10 million public housing units for low-income earners this year, as well as limits of purchases of second homes and other restrictions.

Data in recent weeks have suggested that the curbing efforts are having an impact. China’s housing prices were largely unchanged in September from a month earlier and grew at a slower pace than in September 2010, indicating Beijing’s efforts to cool the real estate sector are having an impact.

Speculation has turned to whether authorities will now relax restrictions. On Monday, China’s eastern city of Nanjing said it would let residents borrow more money from the city’s housing provident fund to buy “ordinary homes,” in a move designed to give the struggling property sector a boost. While it didn’t elaborate, such homes are often defined as no larger than 140 square meters.

In the southern city of Foshan earlier this month, local officials announced they would lift some property-market restrictions, then postponed that move the next day “to seek further public opinion and to make an assessment on the effects of such measures”, without giving further details.

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao on Saturday stressed that all levels of government need to reinforce China’s controls of the property market, and that tightening efforts in the property market and the construction of public homes in China are at a pivotal moment.

It will be interesting to see how the Chinese react to this problem. They surrendered central control of all pricing and embraced a modified form of capitalism. With capitalism comes its associated ills, one of which is Ponzi viruses. Once a Ponzi virus in unleashed on the financial system it reproduces like a cancer cell until it grows so large it imperils the economy. China should have stamped out this virus years ago, but the ensuing development it created was highly sought after by the government, so they didn't recognize the danger in what they were doing.

They now have a Ponzi scheme so large it threatens everything. The civil unrest at this showroom is a minor skirmish in what could easily grow into a massive outpouring of violence when the crash wipes the illusions of wealth of the entire nation. If people are this upset over a 25% decline, they are obviously quite attached to their notion that prices only go up.

The Shanghai property-owner demonstration found little support on China’s Internet, where most still expressed worries that housing prices are too high. In an informal poll posted on the Twitter-like microblogging site Sina Weibo that had attracted more than 34,000 votes by Tuesday evening, 80% said they that thought it was normal for housing prices to fall and that the Shanghai protestors were just playing up the issue.

“This is an immoral action,” Weibo user Xiaobai Yeyou Naxieshi wrote in one of the 7 million property-related posts Sina had collected Tuesday on a special topic page. “Buying a house is a form of investment and every investment involves risk. If prices didn’t fall, people who can’t afford to buy an apartment would really have to wait forever.

Interesting that your average Chinese citizen realizes people cannot be priced out forever, but the average Californian doesn't get the concept.

Dear Government, can you please cancel my purchase of Petrochina shares? A refund based on the IPO price would be fine,” joked Linshi Renyuan. Petrochina, which debuted on the Shanghai stock market at 16.7 yuan per share in 2007, was trading at to 9.85 yuan per share at the end of the day Tuesday.

LOL! But real estate is different. Prices only go up. Real estate is an investment with no risk, right?

That said, a sustained drop in housing prices could spark its own displeasure. It could also spark criticism that Beijing’s policies don’t address long-term issues.

Outspoken Chinese real estate tycoon Ren Zhiqiang, whose properties haven’t been involved in the demonstrations, said on his microblogon Monday, “Does the government really want to solve the housing (issue) for the public or is it just using the property market as a tool to balance between economic growth and the public sentiment?”

The answer is obvious: the Chinese government doesn't care at all about providing affordable housing, it simply wants economic growth and the perception of wealth even if that wealth is an illusion based on a Ponzi scheme.

“Why doesn’t the government work on land supply, land prices and tax incentives? Why doesn’t it raise wages and lower home purchase taxes, and raise the affordability for the citizens?” Mr. Ren asked.

– Esther Fung with contributions from Amy Li and Josh Chin

Yes, why doesn't the Chinese government work on those things. They demand they have created is artificial, just like ours was. They need to create real demand based on higher wages and increased worker productivity. The rest is an illusion.

North Korea towers in Irvine

Shanghai will be littered with empty housing towers built for high-end residents who simply don't exist. Orange County is also littered with empty housing towers built for high wage earners who simply aren't present. One of the most obvious examples of this phenomenon is the North Korea towers in Irvine, otherwise known as the Marquee at Park Place.

Most building and development happens in reaction to prices in the resale market. If developers believe they can sell a certain product for a certain price, they will provide that product if they believe they can do it profitably. Unfortunately, when the resale value is an illusion created by a housing bubble, developers build projects like these and either sell them to bagholders like the North Korea towers, or they become the bagholders like the Astoria across the street.

These false price signals sets in motion a great deal of wasted economic activity. The resources devoted to producing the worthless assets could have been, and should have been, diverted to other uses which would have had more societal value. This misallocation of resources is the problem with Ponzi viruses. For example, in the 16th century, the entire Dutch economy revolved around producing tulip bulbs. The misallocation of resources created a severe economic slump when tulip prices crashed.

Each dollar spent constructing an empty housing tower was robbed from a better use. Whatever this use might have been, it certainly would have helped the economy far more than the empty towers which serve as a testament to the folly of housing bubbles everywhere.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

This property is available for sale via the MLS.

Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707

949.769.1599

sales@idealhomebrokers.com

North Korea at NightMarquee at Park Place at Night

Irvine House Address … 3131 MICHELSON Dr #507 Irvine, CA 92612

Resale House Price …… $390,000

Beds: 2

Baths: 2

Sq. Ft.: 1500

$260/SF

Property Type: Residential, Condominium

Style: One Level, Contemporary

View: Yes

Year Built: 2005

Community: Airport Area

County: Orange

MLS#: S677328

Source: SoCalMLS

On Redfin: 6 days

——————————————————————————

The unit is on the 5th floor of the Marquee at park Place. This unit is a 2 bedroom plus den with 2 baths. View of surrounding office buildings. Two parking spots in the second level. Small storage locker.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

Proprietary IHB commentary and analysis

Resale Home Price …… $390,000

House Purchase Price … $817,500

House Purchase Date …. 1/20/2006

Net Gain (Loss) ………. ($450,900)

Percent Change ………. -55.2%

Annual Appreciation … -12.1%

Cost of Home Ownership

————————————————-

$390,000 ………. Asking Price

$13,650 ………. 3.5% Down FHA Financing

4.18% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate

$376,350 ………. 30-Year Mortgage

$136,919 ………. Income Requirement

$1,836 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment

$338 ………. Property Tax (@1.04%)

$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)

$81 ………. Homeowners Insurance (@ 0.25%)

$433 ………. Private Mortgage Insurance

$849 ………. Homeowners Association Fees

============================================

$3,537 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

-$289 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)

-$525 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment (Amortization)

$20 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)

$69 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves

============================================

$2,813 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands

——————————————————————————

$3,900 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%

$3,900 ………. Closing Costs @1%

$3,764 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan

$13,650 ………. Down Payment

============================================

$25,214 ………. Total Cash Costs

$43,100 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves

============================================

$68,314 ………. Total Savings Needed

——————————————————————————————————————————————————-

November's presentatations have been moved

Due to competing demands from holiday parties, we have decided to move the November and December presentations to the classroom at the offices of Intercap Lending.

Larry Roberts is hosting a Las Vegas cashflow properties presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: Las Vegas cashflow property – Intercap Lending

Larry Roberts and Shevy Akason are hosting an OC housing market presentation at the offices of Intercap Lending (9401 Jeronimo, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) on November 9, 2011. Please RSVP at sales@idealhomebrokers.com. Register online here: OC Housing Market – Intercap Lending