Monthly Archives: December 2009

IHB News 12-19-2009

I hope you are enjoying your pre-holiday weekend. Are you finished shopping for the holidays? Spend or save — what’s an American supposed to do?

41 GILLMAN St Irvine, CA 92612 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 41 GILLMAN St Irvine, CA 92612
Resale Home Price …… $510,000

{book1}

The battled starts adversaries
We bathe in our blood
The worst is yet to come
We’ve reached the covenant
To kill what we have started

Escape the Fate — The Guillotine

IHB News

When I first started writing for the blog, there was no set format or template for anything, so each post was made from scratch or with a little cut and paste. Over time, with the desire to improve accuracy, deliver more information, and do it quickly (and still have a life), I developed an Excel Spreadsheet I use to create the structure of a post.

Each week I sit down to select properties and write my posts for the week (yes, I batch them). My first task is to look up the average APR on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage and put it into my template. Each property I evaluate will be using the same interest rate assumption, and as long as the post isn’t delayed too long, the rates are current. I use the average APR instead of the average interest rate because I want to look at the true cost of financing instead of the rate that gets attention.

For each post, I need 6 specific data points plus the data dump from the MLS. The key data points are (1) address, (2) asking price, (3) original purchase price, (4) original purchase date, (5) Mello Roos fees, and (6) HOA Fees. Information below the property details is cut and paste from the IDX so there are no inaccuracies in typing.

The cool part is how much calculation goes on in the background to generate the tables of numbers.

The Income Requirement started out as a simple 25% of purchase price. I wanted to emphasize to people back in 2007 to the fact that house prices bottomed at 4-times income, and if you go back to traditional financing, you need much larger incomes to support the prices at the time. Well, that served its purpose, but to give a more accurate vision of the financing picture, I created a formula that takes traditional underwriting standards to calculate the income it takes to support the asking price at current interest rates. People can judge for themselves if a property is affordable or desirable.

The Downpayment needed used to be a simple 20% of the purchase price. Again, back in 2007, I wanted to emphasize to people who were not accustomed to 20% downpayments that these monsters were coming back, and the sticker prices on houses was going to have to adjust to the fact that nobody has a downpayment (cue FHA). Now, the formula I use is more nuanced; it displays 20% down for any property over $417,000 (a somewhat arbitrary cutoff), and it displays 3.5% down for any property under $417,000. The assumption is that lower priced properties are probably first-time buyers using FHA financing, and their financial picture is different than the 20% down buyer.

I used to get out a hand calculator and type the details of each transaction to calculate the total profit and loss. I am amazed I did not make more mistakes. Now it is in a spreadsheet, and I accurately represent the amount the owner (or lender) netted after sales commissions. A benefit of this is that I can accurately measure the financial performance of the “trade” — since so many are obsessed with making a fortune in real estate, it seems appropriate to see the truth, good or bad.

The calculation of annual appreciation is the most complex of the ones I make. It is really an internal rate of return calculation where I assume the purchase price was spent in period 1, and the proceeds come back later. The calculation is difficult because the holding period for houses can range from a few months to 30 years so getting a stable number of periods that did not crash the calculation was tough. I finally duplicated the formula in three different time periods, and I take the result of the most precise time period that does not return an error… I think this is probably only interesting to Excel buffs, but…

The Mortgage Payment, Monthly Cash Outlays and the Monthly Cost of Ownership are directly from our fundamental value reports. I don’t display it in the post, but my spreadsheet has the complete breakdown of the cost of ownership including the Mello Roos and HOA fees. I investigate those for each property, but I don’t directly post the result. I can if people are interested, but I want to keep the size of the posts manageable and the content relevant.

So that is where we are with the post information and presentation. Sometimes the interesting part of the post is in these numbers, and sometimes it is not. Either way, the data is always available, and I try to make it as accurate as possible.

Housing Bubble News from Patrick.net

Luxury-House Owners in U.S. Walk Away More Than Others (bloomberg.com)
Debtor’s Dilemma: Pay the Mortgage or Walk Away (online.wsj.com)
Shadow inventory looms over housing market (centralvalleybusinesstimes.com)
Federal government is selling lots of houses in South Florida (sun-sentinel.com)
More People Remaining Unemployed Longer (courant.com)
Spend or save — what’s an American supposed to do? (latimes.com)
Banks walk away, while telling you not to! (market-ticker.denninger.net)
Citigroup to stop admitting losses for 30 days (usatoday.com)
More foreclosures on horizon in LV (lvrj.com)
Housing’s Treacherous Path: From 44% Houseownership to 70% (financemymoney.com)
Many counties in California are still overpriced. Massively overpriced. (doctorhousingbubble.com)
Foreclosure buyer demand dips as supply mounts (reuters.com)
Realtor: “All the CRAZIES are out there buying now” (healdsburgbubble.blogspot.com)
Underwater Houseowner Should Have Waited Longer To Buy (online.wsj.com)
The Fed will hike rates — in 2011 (money.cnn.com)
The biggest real estate flops of 2009 (finance.yahoo.com)
Luxury house markets show bigger % price cuts (lansner.freedomblogging.com)
California house values likely to be down in 2010 (nctimes.com)
Nearly 650,000 are long-term jobless in CA (economy.freedomblogging.com)
Another wave of Phoenix-area foreclosures forseen (google.com)
Why a 35% Decline in Housing Values Would Be Good for the Nation (Charles Hugh Smith)
Weathering the Downhill Slope of Recreational Real Estate (nytimes.com)
Fannie Mae Losses May Exceed $200Bn (housingwire.com)
America’s municipal-bond market: State of pay (economist.com)
How buying a house is gambling (seekingalpha.com)
Los Angeles-area foreclosure rate increases in October (latimesblogs.latimes.com)
California housing market will face another bad year in 2010 (doctorhousingbubble.com)
Foreclosures fall, but banks bracing for next big wave (csmonitor.com)
U.S. House rejects mortgage “cramdown” measure (news.yahoo.com)
Goldman Trades Shouldn’t Get U.S. Aid, Volcker Says (bloomberg.com)
Interest Rates Are Low, but Banks Balk at Refinancing (nytimes.com)
There is no “Free Market” Housing Solution (newgeography.com)

Housing Bubble News

Payback For Bernanke

ForbesJoshua Zumbrun‎Dec 17, 2009‎

Worse, he denied that the housing bubble was a concern, and as a highly-regarded Harvard- and MIT-educated economist, who went on to chair the economics

Which Bubbles Should The Fed Pop?

Atlantic OnlineDaniel Indiviglio‎Dec 14, 2009‎

The tech bubble of the late 90s, for example, didn’t hurt many people who lived outside Silicon Valley or didn’t own many tech stocks. The housing bubble

FHA Troubles Are Likely to Curtail Demand

Monthly ReviewDean Baker‎Dec 12, 2009‎

It seems that many policymakers even now have not come to the grips with the housing bubble. They fail to recognize that the surge in house prices from 1996 .

41 GILLMAN St Irvine, CA 92612 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 41 GILLMAN St Irvine, CA 92612

Resale Home Price … $510,000

Income Requirement ……. $105,721
Downpayment Needed … $102,000
20% Down Conventional

Home Purchase Price … $265,000
Home Purchase Date …. 8/31/2001

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $214,400
Percent Change ………. 92.5%
Annual Appreciation … 7.5%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.01%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $2,193
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $2,800
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $2,240

Property Details for 41 GILLMAN St Irvine, CA 92612

Beds 2
Baths 2 baths
Size 1,594 sq ft
($320 / sq ft)
Lot Size 6,608 sq ft
Year Built 1965
Days on Market 85
Listing Updated 12/8/2009
MLS Number S598344
Property Type Single Family, Residential
Community University Park
Tract V1

According to the listing agent, this listing may be a pre-foreclosure or short sale.

Beautiful single level home, 2BD/2BA + den. Nicely upgraded, well maintained, wood flooring throughout. Spacious kitchen. Bright, open floor plan. Fireplace in living room and den. Large lot which includes a spacious back yard and an enclosed front yard. Walking distance from association pools/club house. Conveniently located in University Park, top schools. This unit is a must see unit.

When I first saw this property listed as a short sale, I figured it was a familiar story; Irvine homeowner more than doubles mortgage and ends up walking away. This one is not quite so clear. From my data source, it shows about $310,000 in mortgage debt and about $90,000 in mortgage equity withdrawal. There may be an mortgage or refi that isn’t showing up in my data source to explain why this would be a short sale.

Maximizing Home Ownership

It is long-standing government policy to maximize home ownership, but is that really a good idea?

30 GRAY DOVE   Irvine, CA 92618  front 2

Irvine Home Address … 30 GRAY DOVE Irvine, CA 92618
Resale Home Price …… $909,000

{book1}

Here comes the action
Here comes at last
Lord give me reaction
Lord give me your chance

You should follow me down
In satellite towns
There’s no colour and no sound
I’ve been ten feet underground

I gotta get out of this satellite town

Black and White Town — Doves

I don’t know who the blogger is over at Finance My Money, but the posts are excellent. Below is an exerpt from Housing’s Treacherous Path: From 44 Percent
Homeownership to 70 Percent. The Levittown Dream and Nothing Down
Madness. How a Nation lost its way with Homeownership
.

The cookie cutter planned community madness started with Levittown
after World War II. These towns were built in communities in New York,
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Puerto Rico. The communities were built
with speed and efficiency. It is interesting that the communities
started out as rental units and within two days 2,000 units had been
rented. With demand surging the properties were then sold as purchase
units with the help of the Federal Housing Administration (more on them
later).

Levittown is now used in a derogatory sense to highlight massive
cookie cutter suburbia. Many people in these communities actually
enjoyed their towns but critics were everywhere. Yet we went from
Levittowns to McMansion Villages with the twist that homes were bigger
for ever smaller families. Once the credit markets were freed from any
shackles by deregulation banks pushed the limits on the borrowing
population. That is how places like California saw home prices triple in less than a decade.

The problem with believing that homeownership is part of the
American Dream is that it misses the fundamental economic question. By
labeling something a dream it makes it harder to confront with factual
data. This reminds me of the parents that let their kids audition for
American Idol even though they sound like a cat in heat. Many people
should not be homeowners and that is okay. Yet politically this must
be like kryptonite because who in the world is going to want to pop
that dream? Can you imagine being labeled the anti-homeownership
candidate?

This insistence on allowing the homeownership dream to permeate the
country has pushed the homeownership rate to unsupportable levels:

home-ownership-rates

Now during the Great Depression homeownership dropped to 44
percent. It is also the case that during this time many loans were
also based on 5 year balloons which made it hard for many to borrow,
especially in the bank failing environment of the depression. Yet
after that bump, homeownership increased from 1941 all the way to our
housing peak in 2005 reaching a peak near 70 percent. Yet very few
even bothered to ask if this was even good for our economy? Clearly it
wasn’t.

{book4}

I discussed this issue in The Great Housing Bubble:

Before a policy can be formulated, there needs to be an open
discussion of the goal of maximizing home ownership. Owning a home has
become synonymous with the American Dream. Every Presidential
administration has had the expansion of home ownership as one of its
goals. The tax code is structured to give tax breaks to home owners to
encourage home ownership. The idea of home ownership is deeply embedded
in our culture.

Managing the rate of home ownership is analogous to managing the
rate of economic growth. It is not the policy of our government or the
Federal Reserve to maximize economic growth. Instead, the Federal
Reserve balances economic growth with inflation and tries to manage
economic growth to keep it on a sustainable path. This policy grew out
of our painful history of economic cycles of boom and bust. It was
realized that economic growth must be tempered to a sustainable level
to minimize the damage of economic downturns. Similarly, the rate of
home ownership should not be maximized. Home ownership will never reach
100%, and this should not be the goal of housing policy. Just as
economic growth is tempered by the rate of inflation, home ownership
rates are tempered by the rate of default of mortgage loan programs.

The harsh reality is that a certain percentage of the population
lacks the desire, discipline or responsibility requisite to be a
homeowner. There is a percentage of the population who do not want to
be homeowners. Many people require mobility to pursue career
opportunities or other goals. Some people like the freedom of renting
and do not want the responsibilities of home ownership that go beyond
monthly payments. There are some people who simply do not make housing
payments consistently. This group is not capable of sustaining home
ownership. There may be opportunities for policy initiatives to
increase education to make this group smaller, but there will always be
some people who cannot or will not do what is necessary to keep a
house: make their payments. There is a percentage of the general
population who should be renters.

There is a natural, sustainable level of home ownership. Home
ownership rates in the United States increased markedly at the end of
World War Two as the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage became the commonly
accepted vehicle of home finance. In the 60 years that followed, home
ownership rates stabilized between 60% and 65% through good economic
times and recessions and interest rates ranging from below 6% to above
18%. Subprime lending demonstrated that increasing the home ownership
rate through the widespread use of lending programs with high default
rates is inherently unstable. Managing the home ownership rate is not a
subject of governmental policy. Any legislative initiative to
specifically limit home ownership rates would be politically
unpalatable; however, either a market-based initiative or a legislative
initiative that prevents the widespread use of loan programs subject to
high rates of default rates would effectively manage the home ownership
rate and prevent painful declines in that rate. Home ownership rates
decline as homeowners become renters, a painful process known as
foreclosure.

Do you think we should be using the GSEs to put people into homes when they can’t sustain ownership? That is what we are doing.

30 GRAY DOVE   Irvine, CA 92618  front 2

Irvine Home Address … 30 GRAY DOVE Irvine, CA 92618

Resale Home Price … $909,000

Income Requirement ……. $188,432
Downpayment Needed … $181,800
20% Down Conventional

Home Purchase Price … $1,215,500
Home Purchase Date …. 12/13/2006

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(361,040)
Percent Change ………. -25.2%
Annual Appreciation … -9.6%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.01%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $3,908
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $5,630
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $4,350

Property Details for 30 GRAY DOVE Irvine, CA 92618

Beds 3
Baths 4 baths
Size 2,717 sq ft
($335 / sq ft)
Lot Size 4,481 sq ft
Year Built 2006
Days on Market 1
Listing Updated 12/11/2009
MLS Number P713959
Property Type Single Family, Residential
Community Portola Springs
Tract Lasc

According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.

Portola Springs beauty! Three bedrooms upstairs- each with their own attached bath! Downstairs comes with charming court yard and living area- kitchen boasts stainless steel appliances, and granite countertops. Come see this one this weekens as it won’t last!

There are a few IHB readers who have told me they looked at properties over $1,000,000 in Portola Springs in early 2007 and after reading the blog, they decided to wait. Today’s featured property puts those families about $350,000 ahead of the purchaser of today’s featured property. Based on the purchase date, my early analysis posts came out two months too late. Sorry.

This property was purchased for $1,215,500 on 12/13/2006. The owner used a $972,160 first mortgage, a $121,520 HELOC and a $121,820 downpayment. The downpayment may explain why he held on so long…

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 09/18/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 06/12/2009
Document Type: Notice of Default

The lender, US Bank National Association, bought the property back for $887,826 on 11/12/2009.

Irvine Housing Blog No Kool Aid

I hope you have enjoyed this week, and thank you for reading the Irvine Housing Blog: astutely observing
the Irvine home market and combating California Kool-Aid since
September 2006.

Have a great weekend,

Irvine Renter

Unemployment and Foreclosures

As unemployment keeps rising so will foreclosures; in fact, foreclosures will not peak until well after unemployment does.

35 POTOMAC Irvine, CA 92620 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 35 POTOMAC Irvine, CA 92620
Resale Home Price …… $599,999

{book1}

I been laid off from work
My rent is due
My kids all need
Brand new shoes

So I went to the bank
To see what they could do
They said son – looks like bad luck
Got-a hold on you

Money’s Too Tight to Mention — Simply Red

A recent Bloomberg article, U.S. Foreclosures to Reach Record 3.9 Million in 2009, “We are a long way from a recovery,” John Quigley,
economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley,
said in an interview. “You can’t start to see improvement in
the housing market until after unemployment peaks.” The UCLA Anderson Forecast Orange County, believes foreclosures can decline in the face of rising unemployment. I don’t know why. As I noted:

The recession in the early 90s was caused by a slowdown in housing
and real estate just like this one. That recession also saw slowdowns
in defense contracting and other industries that made problems even
worse. The recession ended in 1992, but the effect lingered as people
had to be retrained to work in other fields, so unemployment did not
peak until 1993. The delay between the end of the recession and the
peak in unemployment is well documented
.

There were many reasons for the foreclosure crisis of the mid 90s,
and we have all of those problems back with more force. The
foreclosures caused by unemployment do not occur on the day a borrower
loses their job. The delay caused by draining all sources of savings,
maxing out credit lines and utilizing legal maneuvers can slow the
process for two or three years — as we have seen with properties
profiled here daily; therefore, it is reasonable to assume foreclosures
will peak two or three years after a major unemployment crisis
. In
fact, I would argue it is unreasonable to assume that foreclosures have
peaked for this cycle — as the UCLA Anderson Forecast does —
considering unemployment has not peaked, and the newly unemployed will
cause defaults.

Last time around house prices bottomed as foreclosures peaked. It is
unclear if either one caused the other. For example, if house prices
bottomed simply because prices were affordable and supply was low, then
foreclosures may peak not because borrowers are not distressed, but
because distressed borrowers can sell into the resale market rather
than go through foreclosure. Remember, foreclosures are not a sign of
distress as much as they are a sign of distress that cannot be masked
by selling in the open market.

You can buy a house if you plan to be there for a long time and you recognize prices will probably go lower. If you are buying a house because you think prices have bottomed, and you better hurry because you might be priced out, you will be upset and disappointed.

35 POTOMAC Irvine, CA 92620 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 35 POTOMAC Irvine, CA 92620

Resale Home Price … $599,999

Income Requirement ……. $124,377
Downpayment Needed … $120,000
20% Down Conventional

Home Purchase Price … $540,000
Home Purchase Date …. 3/15/2004

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $23,999
Percent Change ………. 11.1%
Annual Appreciation … 1.8%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.01%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $2,580
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $3,240
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $2,580

Property Details for 35 POTOMAC Irvine, CA 92620

Beds 3
Baths 1 full 2 part baths
Size 1,424 sq ft
($421 / sq ft)
Lot Size 3,500 sq ft
Year Built 1985
Days on Market 4
Listing Updated 12/9/2009
MLS Number S598384
Property Type Single Family, Residential
Community Northwood
Tract Gl

Highly upgraded two story home with nicely landscaped wrap around yard, attached 2 car garage; hardwood floors,totally remodeled kitchen with granite counters, added counter space; new cabinets; custom window coverings;large master bedroom with ceiling fan; dual sinks in master bath; two closets. This home is gorgeous!! Must see!

Exclamation points and the venerable “Must see.” Typical realtorese.

I do like the photograph of the front of the house. The rich blue sky, the fall colors and the interesting shadows make it a nice photo. I don’t know if it helps sell this house as the front yard looks unkempt, but it is a cool photo.

When the current owners bought this place back in 2004, they must have felt they had reason to celebrate. They paid $540,000 on 3/15/2005, but after waiting 60 days, they managed to get an appraisal for $594,000, and opened a HELOC bringing their debt to that amount. It is possible they simply went through the motions to get the credit line as there are no further refinances after 2004.

Lenders Can Hold Real Estate Indefinitely

Did you know that the only pressure on lenders to dispose of their real estate owned comes from shareholders?

15 MORRO BAY Irvine, CA 92602 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 15 MORRO BAY Irvine, CA 92602
Resale Home Price …… $1,629,000

{book1}

So sure
So sure you are
Nothing can
Touch you now
I need to know
Did you think of me
But you’re forgettng me now
Slow down
Don’t be so
Eager to let me go
Realise it could change you
It could change your mind

Repetition — Blur

Today I briefly want to again Revisit Option ARMs, and I want to address a common misperception about REO; lenders do not have to sell REO due to regulatory pressure. Shareholders may dissuade lenders from becoming real estate investors, but the banking regulators will not.

The Option ARM Kingpins: Who Holds the Elusive Option
ARMs?

$189 Billion Securitized and Outstanding and big Three of Wells
Fargo, JP Morgan, and Bank of America Playing with Time
.

There have been many charts … and much of the confusion is around a few key points:

-1. Banks have been circumspect given the actual number of option ARMs

-2. Many option ARMs are in California (roughly 60 percent of the market)

-3. Many of those behind on payments are now simply not paying their mortgage but banks are not moving

It is hard to quantify the above data since this is something banks
would like to hide. Nearly 60 percent of all current outstanding
option ARMs are in the hard hit state of California.
As many of you know, the median price of a home in California has
fallen by 50 percent. The peak in home prices was reached in 2007, the
last year option ARMs were made in mass. Since that time, option ARMs
were merely ticking financial bombs.

But what if homeowners balk? Many in California are strategically
defaulting. In many cases, unless their mortgage meets with market
rents many will walk away. Also, the California unemployment and
underemployment rate is at 23 percent so no amount of modifying can
help out with a loss of income.

So let us sum up the option ARM market:

option arm market data

$750 billion in option ARMs were originated between 2004 and 2007.
The top 10 option ARM originators cornered over 60 percent of the
market. Of these, many are now part of the too big to fail banks.
We know that $189 billion is still securitized in investor portfolios
while many billions are still on the banks books (i.e., $107 billion
with Wells Fargo and $50 billion with Chase). The bottom line is the
option ARM issue is still here and we will be contending with this for
the next couple of years.

That doesn’t sound very good, does it?

From yesterday’s discussion about Shadow Inventory, matt138, said, “Shadow Shadow inventory – the people who are currently thinking, “why the hell am I still paying if nobody else is?” I did some calculations and my result was: A LOT.”

What I find interesting is how much of the Option ARM problem has already been resolved (probably through foreclosure). If $750B was issued, and only $200B remains, only 20%-25% of the Option ARM problem remains — at least in the form of Option ARMs. Many of these original borrowers already went through short sale, foreclosure or walked away. The Option ARMs didn’t go away due to market sale because the homedebtors were all underwater, and these loans did not go away through successful loan modification because cure rates are very low.

The good news is 75% of the Option ARM holders appear to have defaulted early. The bad news is most of the homes of these borrowers will end up as REO sold on the open market, it is only a matter of when. This problem is going to be stretched out as long as possible, and the abundance of overhead supply will prevent appreciation from saving the market for many years.

Lender’s Options for REO

The lenders I have spoken with are genuinely concerned about the auditors forcing them to reclassify loans. Many lenders are not properly categorizing their loans for accounting purposes — the still have it on their books as if it is a good loan and the borrower is making their payments. Many, many non-performing residential loans are still classified as performing while lenders have the shield of government loan modification programs. The reality is many of these loans are not performing, they are never going to, and lenders are not being forced to recognize this fact until their balance sheet ratios support it.

Regulators are not concerned with what a lender does with the REO it picks up through the foreclosure process as long as the losses are accurately accounted for — in theory. Once the REO department gets a property, the only pressure they get to sell property comes from through management from shareholders.

Shareholder Pressure

People who invest in banks are investing in a business that writes loans and carries loans on its balance sheet. If a balance sheet becomes polluted in the eyes of investors with real estate assets, it starts to look less like a bank and more like a real estate investment trust or a hedge fund. When banks cease to be banks, investors bail out and stock prices crumble — at least that is the belief of bankers, so the management does not want to hold real estate. Also, REO is lingering evidence of prior poor lending practices, and nobody wants to keep that around.

The implication for the market is simple, there will be no forced dump of REO instigated by bank regulators. That isn’t to say we don’t have a huge pig to send through the snake, but it can be digested in smaller pieces rather than one massive chunk. We may (probably will) see a cartel arrangement evolve, but the large amount of supply and the competition to dispose of it will serve as a drag on prices until the inventory is exhausted. In some markets that will take decades.

Direct from an Asset Manager

As part of my work, I go to Building Industry Association meetings on a regular basis. As a courtesy to them, I am keeping my sources anonymous, but should any of you wish to attend a BIA meeting, you can see and here these people yourself. The meetings are open to the public for a fee.

At a recent meeting I listened to asset managers from two major West Coast banks. I asked one of these asset managers to detail his banks policy toward REO based on market conditions. He said that in markets where they do not see recovery in a longer-term horizon (think Lancaster), they may sell at reduced prices to clean up the mess; however, if they do see the market recovering in a reasonable time, they will hold the property, and perhaps even rent it out while values improved. In short, the REO departments of these banks are empowered to act as responsible asset managers trying to obtain the greatest recovery for the bank. This also means there will be no massive inventory dump forced by a government regulator.

Each bank will evaluate its own financial circumstances, its exposure to the market and other factors and pursue a policy of maximizing recovery while disposing of these assets. Certain banks will dump in some markets and hold in others. It will be the chaotic collapse of a cartel with much volatility, and most likely slowly declining prices for several years as lenders slowly release their inventory to obtain price recovery.

Blue skies are not here yet.

15 MORRO BAY Irvine, CA 92602 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 15 MORRO BAY Irvine, CA 92602

Resale Home Price … $1,629,000

Income Requirement ……. $337,684
Downpayment Needed … $325,800
20% Down Conventional

Home Purchase Price … $791,875 ???
Home Purchase Date …. 3/28/2001

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $739,385
Percent Change ………. 105.7%
Annual Appreciation … 8.3%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.01%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $7,004
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $9,040
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $6,540

Property Details for 15 MORRO BAY Irvine, CA 92602

Gourmet Kitchen Award

Beds 4
Baths 4 full 1 part baths
Size 4,464 sq ft
($365 / sq ft)
Lot Size 8,285 sq ft
Year Built 2000
Days on Market 4
Listing Updated 12/10/2009
MLS Number P713549
Property Type Single Family, Residential
Community Northpark
Tract Cmbr

**Bring your checkbook & RUN…DONT WALK!** Drop-Dead GORGEOUS & *PRICED TO STEAL!* PREMIUM GREENBELT Location, Serene PRIVACY & Tranquil PARK VIEWS! Rare *OVERSIZED LOT* w/Huge ENTERTAINERS BACKYARD! Location! LOCATION! **THIS HOME SURPASSES EVERY HOUSE IN THIS PRICE RANGE!** Must See to Believe! Exquisite Architecture w/Romatic Archways, Dramatic 10-Ft Ceilings, Walls of Windows, Splendor of Natural Light & Inviting French Doors that Welcome Outdoor Living & Entertaining! Spacious Open Design offers 4 Bedrooms w/Bath en suite (Including Main Floor BR & BA) & BONUS ROOM (Optional 5th BR) plus Office, Exercise Rm/Study, & Elegant Formal Living & Dining. Huge Gourmet Kitchen w/Chefs Island Opens to Charming Breakfast Nook & Generous Family Room w/access to Sprawling Backyard & Custom BBQ. An Entertainers Delight! Master w/Retreat, Fireplace & Huge Closet plus Generous secondary bedrooms w/walk-in closets & tranquil park views! EVERY ATTENTION TO DETAIL! *ACT FAST!* Only ONE like this!!!

This description is awful on every level. It contains (1) RANDOM CAPS LOCK, (2) three exclamation points, (3) random asterisks, (4) numerous cliches, (5) over-the-top writing, (6) Intermittent Caps, (7) cheap techniques to create urgency, (8) and a general lack of substance. If the nonsense were strpped from the description, the number of words cuts in half and the reader is spared needless distraction.

My data records do not show the original purchase price, but it does show me the original first mortgage. I assumed the mortgage was 80% of the purchase price. That may not be correct.

As borrowers, the owner’s of today’s featured property did not add to their mortgage. Kudos. That is a rare accomplishment worthy of recognition.

Shadow Inventory Revisited

Since I first estimated Shadow Inventory others have been trying to figure out how big the problem really is. Today’s featured property is an example of Shadow Inventory finally coming to light.

12 FOXHILL Irvine, CA 92604 inside

Irvine Home Address … 12 FOXHILL Irvine, CA 92604
Resale Home Price …… $594,900

{book1}

If you ever feel like something’s missing
Things you’ll never understand,
Little white shadows sparkle and glisten,
Part of a system, a plan

White Shadows — Coldplay

One of the carryovers of the Great Housing Bubble zeitgeist is the high level of suspicion about the people who are gaming the system to their advantage. The general public has little or no perception of the Titanic forces competing for their money, and discussions about sinister elements at the Federal Reserve sounds like conspiracy-theory nonsense to some.

Similarly, discussions of “Shadow Inventory” sound like the ravings of madmen. But those of us paying careful attention to the numbers know we have a problem. These ravings are the voice of reason staring at the chaotic struggle of greed and pointing out the economic ripples. These ripples are growing to a tsunami of foreclosed properties.

I am utterly astonished at the level of Government intervention, but we will see more. IMO, if you look far enough down the road, losses to the FHA — losses directly absorbed by the US Taxpayer — will finally call an end to government market props. Pressure is already building to increase downpayment requirements and eliminate tax subsidies. FHA is subprime, and everyone knows it. Will this batch walk away when they go underwater? Probably.

Shadow Inventory Revisited

In Shadow Inventory Orange County, I explored one method of calculating or estimating the number of
truly distressed property owners in Orange County. Since then, others
have written on the same subject including a new blog I am introducing today.

New Blog

I like to recognize excellence when I see it, and I found a new blog through Patrick.net called Finance my Money. The “About” doesn’t say much about the author, and the blog has only been around since August of 2009, but I found two excellent posts there:

California Notice of Defaults hit Record in 2009: Approximately 476,000 Notice of Defaults but Foreclosures Fell. HAMP Most Active in California. Approximately 5,900 Permanent HAMP Mods in California.

California Housing Inventory Mystery: 206,000 Homes on MLS but is the Real Inventory 412,000 or closer to 618,000?

The first post confirms, “California is at the center of the foreclosure wave. Of the 306,000
foreclosure filings in November 23 percent hit in California. You
cannot talk about housing distress without looking at the state of
California. The California housing market will be in a slump for many
years and there are a variety of reasons why California housing will see no recovery in 2010.
One of the most important leading indicators of housing distress is
notice of defaults. With so much talk about housing recovering the
data is showing that 2009 will set a record in terms of NODs filed in
California. 476,000 notice of defaults will be filed by the end of the
year setting a pace of over 1,300 NODs filed per day in 2009.”

In Shadow Inventory Orange County, I discussed that one method of leaving Shadow Inventory is by curing the loan, generally with a loan modification. Since loan modifications are billed as a housing market panacea, it is worth seeing how these programs have done:

Many have argued that HAMP will help many of these loans. California is the largest HAMP state:

hamp modifications

Yet the above number is a misnomer. In fact, nationwide only a handful of modifications have become permanent:

hamp perm

Of the 759,000 HAMP trials started only 4 percent have become
permanent. This number is abysmal. In fact, if we take the 148,000
trial mods in California we can assume that only 5,920 have made it to
the permanent stage. We had 476,000 notice of defaults filed in 2009!
The HAMP is merely a delay of reality.

The cure rate was 6.6% back in September. It isn’t improving.

In defense of the HAMP program, the cure rates will get better because there are people who have made 1 or 2 months payments that will cure when they get to three months, so there is a lag in the reporting. The headlines will ignore the lag two months from now when the real cure rate is revealed.

For what it is worth, I guestimate cure rates will be between 10% and 15% as currently defined; however, there will be pressure to lower the bar. Did you notice three months is considered permanent? Three years maybe, but three months of consecutive payments doesn’t seem like much to ask. Despite how low this bar is, it could go lower. In fact, this program could fail to produce a single loan that survived to a market sale or payoff, and by their standards it would be a success.

We pick up the Shadow Inventory issue again in the second post:

So even though notice of defaults for 2009 are reaching the 475,000
mark actual defaults for the year are going at a pace of 230,000. In
other words, there is a major gap in the data. This isn’t because
loans are curing either. Recent cure rates are under 5% and for
California, they are even lower. So most of those 475,000 notice of
defaults are going to become additional inventory at some point. In
fact, how many of those 475,000 homes are even listed in the 206,000
current inventory? That is the major question and brings up the shadow
inventory trends.

A recent report from Amherst Mortgage Insight tackled this question:

shadow inventory

There is another method of calculating shadow inventory. It’s out there, and the lenders don’t really want you to know it.

12 FOXHILL Irvine, CA 92604 inside

Irvine Home Address … 12 FOXHILL Irvine, CA 92604

Resale Home Price … $594,900

Income Requirement ……. $123,320
Downpayment Needed … $118,980
20% Down Conventional

Home Purchase Price … $852,000
Home Purchase Date …. 10/17/2005

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(292,794)
Percent Change ………. -30.2%
Annual Appreciation … -8.4%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.01%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $2,558
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $3,160
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $2,510

Property Details for 12 FOXHILL Irvine, CA 92604

Beds 4
Baths 2 full 1 part baths
Size 2,522 sq ft
($236 / sq ft)
Lot Size 5,400 sq ft
Year Built 1975
Days on Market 4
Listing Updated 12/10/2009
MLS Number F1827782
Property Type Single Family, Residential
Community El Camino Real
Tract Dc
According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.
REO.CASH ONLY! Open bright & airy. Landscaped backyard. Close to parks, schools, malls and freeways. 4 Bed + 2.5 Baths.

This was a loan issued by Nationpoint; it didn’t perform very well. The owner of this property paid $852,000 on 10/17/2005. He used a $680,000 first mortgage, a $170,000 second mortgage, and a $2,000 downpayment. On 6/20/2006 he got $10,000 out of the property. About a year later, he stopped paying the mortgage.

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 03/05/2008
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 11/30/2007
Document Type: Notice of Default

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 11/30/2007
Document Type: Notice of Rescission

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 11/14/2007
Document Type: Notice of Default

This property was purchased on 7/15/2008 for $620,034 by DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO, ; FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006.

Shadow inventory coming to light?

There is not much chance of this property selling for asking price as comps are much higher. This property will be bid up well over asking — not because Fundamental Value says so — it is overpriced at listing price on that basis, but if you look at what buyers are able to finance today, comps for this house are much higher than $600,000.