Monthly Archives: February 2008

Irresponsible

Call me irresponsible

Call me unreliable

Throw in undependable, too

Do my foolish alibis bore you?

Well, I’m not too clever, I

I just adore you

So, call me unpredictable

Tell me I’m impractical

Rainbows, I’m inclined to pursue

Call me irresponsible

Yes, I’m unreliable

But it’s undeniably true

Call Me Irresponsible — Michael Buble

.

.

Being financially responsible can be difficult. I haven’t always been, but I guess there are none so religious as the converted, right? There is a belief in our culture that one can be “responsible with debt.” Personally, I think the whole idea is BS perpetuated by the credit purveyors (drug dealers) who want everyone to be hooked on their product. The most responsible way to manage debt is not to have any and use savings instead.

Most people don’t budget well if they budget at all. Instead of running a surplus each month and putting money into savings, most people (who at least try to be responsible) will target a monthly breakeven where they at least do not fall behind. The problem with this approach is the unexpected always comes up and puts you behind. Budgeting for the unexpected is called saving, and most people do not bother or do not realize its importance.

The true spenders do not set out to run up a mountain of debt, but if they see something they want, they buy it, and they end up with a mountain of debt because of this behavior. Usually this behavior will go on as long as someone will extend them credit to enable their lifestyle. These people are only stressed when all their credit lines are tapped and they actually have to live within their incomes (minus debt service of course.) The longer this behavior goes on and the more it is enabled, the more debt this person will take on until finally they experience a personal Minsky Moment, and all of their debts come due. This is generally a very painful experience.

Today’s seller is a profile of a spender who was enabled by the housing bubble. She bought a small place at the bottom of the last cycle in 1997. Over the 10 years that followed, she refinanced 5 times. Each time it was for a small amount and it was likely used to pay off credit card debt (I am speculating, I don’t know for sure.) Rather than run into a credit limit barrier which might inhibit her lifestyle, she was enabled by the speculative equity building in her little condo to continue this pattern of overspending for a full 10 years. Only now that prices have stopped going up and credit is tightening is she going to be faced with a curtailment of her spending habits. If she drops her price much more, she may even become a short sale, and that would cut off credit altogether. This is where the analogy between credit and drugs breaks down — when you go cold turkey from credit, you don’t have any withdrawals.

Perhaps it is unfair to call this behavior irresponsible, particularly if the bills are paid on time and no creditor is facing a loss; however, this seller could have made $350,000 in equity profit which could have been used for more worthy purposes (retirement, move-up housing, etc.) This was perhaps a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to gain wealth through fortunate timing in a speculative market, and she blew it. If living this way is not irresponsible, it is at least unwise.

46 Monroe Front46 Monroe Kitchen

Asking Price: $554,900IrvineRenter

Income Requirement: $138,725

Downpayment Needed: $110,980

Purchase Price: $163,000

Purchase Date: 12/3/1997

Address: 46 Monroe #77, Irvine, CA 92620

Beds: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq. Ft.: 1,456
$/Sq. Ft.: $381
Lot Size:
Type: Condominium
Style: Contemporary
Year Built: 1986
Stories: Two Levels
View(s): Park or Green Belt
Area: Northwood
County: Orange
MLS#: S518939
Status: Active
On Redfin: 10 days

Gourmet Kitchen Award Largest model, end unit & ‘premium’ large side yard. New paint in & out. New carpet in master & newer laminate flooring in living room, stairs, hallway & 2 BR. New Italian tile flooring-all bathrooms. Toilets have all been replaced, as water heater, motors in furnace, washer & dryer. 4 ceiling fans. Designer archway with colomns lead to ‘gourmet kitchen’, all stainless appliances, sink, potrack with light over a large added kitchen island. Granite look countertops, custom recessed lighting, all cabinets have been replaced, pull out drawers & built-in ‘wine cooler’! Custom french sliders lead to lush topical paradise paved with flag stone, dramatic lighting, Koi pond and water fall, a place to sit under palm trees and enjoy the soothing sound of rushing water. Evenings entertain in this tropical setting around the built-in bar-b-que (which stays) and can be used with butane or with the newly added gasline. New rollup garage door has just been installed. All this & priced to Sell!!

.

.

So how did this seller manager her mortgage?

  • The property was purchased in December 1997 for $163,000. There was a first mortgage for $156,000 and a $7,000 downpayment.
  • 12/15/2000 the property was refinanced for $190,000.
  • 12/5/2001 another refinance for $194,500. Christmas shopping money?
  • 1/10/2003 a refinance for $232,000. Pay off Christmas shopping debts?
  • 11/28/2005 a refinance for $381,000. Remodel?
  • 1/3/2007 a refinance for $418,000 with an Option ARM.

Ten years and a steadily increasing loan balance on the property. Now if they sell for asking price (which seems high at $381/SF) they stand to walk away with less than $100,000 in cash from a property that went up almost $400,000 in price. Does this seem like good financial planning to you?

What is Equity?

Hey that’s the poor man’s house

Everybody get a look at the poor man’s house

Everywhere they went before must have turned them out

And now they’re living in a poor man’s house

There’s nothing like poverty to get you into heaven

They got a lot of wine and fish up there

And the bread’s unleavened

They got a lot of ears that heard a whip go crack

Lots of missing toes and fingers and scars upon their backs

Daddy’s been working too much for days and days

He doesn’t eat

He never says much but I think this time it’s got him beat

It isn’t that he isn’t strong or kind or clever

Your daddy’s poor today

And he will be poor forever

Hey that’s the poor man’s house

Those kids are living in a poor man’s house

They walk to school with the soles of their shoes worn out

And come home in the evening to the poor man’s house

What are you chopping that wood for

Why are you growing that corn

Mama’s sewing a brand new shirt and

You’re wearing the one that’s torn

I guess it’s for some one elses kid who wasn’t born

In a poor man’s house

Hey take a look at that house

Everybody we’re living in a poor man’s house

Seems like everywhere we go they find us out

Find out that we’ve been living in a poor man’s house

Poor Man’s House — Patty Griffin

.

.

What is Equity?

In simple accounting terms, equity is the difference between how much something is worth and how much money is owed on it (Equity = Assets – Liabilities.) People who purchase real estate use the phrase “building equity” to describe the overall increase in equity over time. However, it is important to look at the factors which either create or destroy equity to see how market conditions and financing terms impact this all-important feature of real estate.

Types of Equity

For purposes of illustration, equity can be broken down into several component parts: Initial Equity, Financing Equity, Inflation Equity, and Speculative Equity. Initial Equity is the amount of money a purchaser puts down to acquire the property. Financing Equity is the gain or loss of total equity based on the decrease or increase in loan balance over time. Inflation Equity is the increase in resale value due to the effect of inflation. This kind of appreciation is the “inflation hedge” that provides the primary financial benefit to home ownership. Finally, there is Speculative Equity. This is the fluctuation in equity caused by speculative activities in a real estate market. This can cause wild swings in equity both up and down. If life’s circumstances or careful analysis and timing cause a sale at the peak of a speculative mania, the windfall can be dramatic. Of course, it can go the other way as well. If a house is purchased at its fundamental valuation where the cost of ownership is equal to the cost of rental using a conventionally amortized mortgage with a downpayment, the amount of owner’s equity is the combination of the above factors.

Initial Equity

The initial equity is equal to a purchaser’s downpayment. If a buyer pays cash for a home, all equity is initial equity. Since most home purchases are financed, this initial equity is usually a small percentage of the purchase price, generally 20%. A downpayment is the borrower’s money acquired through careful financial planning and saving or from the profits gained at the sale of a previous home. Downpayment money is not “free.” This money generally is accumulated in a savings account, or if a buyer chooses to rent instead, downpayment money could be put in a high-yield savings account or other investments. There is an opportunity cost to taking this money out of another investment and putting it into a house. This cost and its impact on home ownership costs are detailed in Rent Versus Own.

Financing Equity

Financing equity is controlled by the loan terms as described previously in Financially Conservative Home Financing and Your Buyer’s Loan Terms. With a conventionally amortizing mortgage, a portion of the payment each month goes toward paying down the loan balance. As this loan balance decreases, the owner’s equity increases. This is a substantial long-term benefit of home ownership. With an interest-only mortgage, the loan balance does not decrease because only the interest is paid with each payment. With this kind of loan, there is no financing equity. One of the major drawbacks of using an interest-only loan does not become apparent until the house is sold and the seller wants to take the equity to the next home in a move-up. Since no financing equity has accumulated, the seller obtains less equity in the transaction. This means the move-up buyer will be able to afford less. Over the short-term, financing equity is not significant because the loan balance is not paid down by a large amount, but if the house has been held for 10 years or more, or if the loan was amortized over a shorter term, the financing equity can be a large amount. This can make a real difference when the total equity amount is to be put toward a larger, more expensive home. Also, financing equity is a great reservoir for retirement savings. In fact, it is the primary mechanism for retirement savings of most Americans.

Negative Amortization

The worst possible loan is the negative amortization loan because of its impact on equity. As noted in the chart above, if a negative amortization loan is utilized, it will consume all equity in its path. It is a cash-out financing that reduces equity. This loan relies on inflation and speculative equity to have any equity at all. The negative amortization loan will only begin to build financing equity after the loan recasts and becomes a fully-amortized loan and the payment skyrockets — assuming the borrower does not default. Most people cannot afford the fully-amortized payment, or they probably would not have used this form of financing initially. Even after the recast and the dramatic increase in payments, the loan does not get back to the original balance for many years.

Inflation Equity

House prices historically have outpaced inflation by 0.7% nationally. In a normal market, this is the only appreciation homeowners obtain. This appreciation is caused by wage inflation translating into higher housing payments and the ability of borrowers to obtain larger loan amounts to bid up prices. In areas like Irvine where wage growth has outpaced the general rate of inflation, the fundamental valuation of houses has increased faster than inflation; however, there are reasons to believe that Appreciation is Dead. The related benefit to home ownership obtained through utilizing a fixed-rate, conventionally-amortizing mortgage is mortgage payments are frozen and the cost of housing does not increase with inflation. Renters must contend with ever-increasing rents while homeowners with the proper financing do not face escalating housing costs. Over the short term this is not significant, but over the long term, the monthly savings accruing to owners can be very sizable, and if the owner owns long enough or downsizes later in life, housing costs can be nearly eliminated when a mortgage is paid off (except for taxes, insurance and upkeep.) Although this benefit is attractive, it is not worth paying much of a premium to obtain. The long-term benefit is quickly negated if there is a short-term additional cost associated with obtaining it. For instance, if a property can be rented for a certain amount today, and this amount will increase by 3% over 30 years, the total cost of ownership — even when fixed — cannot exceed this figure by more than 10% to break even over 30 years. The shorter the holding time, the less this premium is worth. In short, capturing the benefit of inflation equity requires a long holding period and a minimal ownership premium.

Speculative Equity

Speculative Equity is purely a function of irrational exuberance. It has become a common element in certain markets, and capturing it is the dream of every would-be speculator who buys residential real estate. As was noted in Speculation or Investment? it is a losers game, but it does not stop people from chasing after it. The first chart in this post approximates the conditions from 1997 to now in Irvine, and extrapolates a future repetition of the same conditions witnessed from 1997 to 2007. Will these conditions repeat themselves? Who knows? Human nature being what it is, the delusive beliefs of irrational exuberance may take root and the cycle may continue. In the aftermath of the Great Housing Bubble legislators may pass laws from preventing it from happening again. Of course, such laws require enforcement, and when greed takes hold, enforcement may simply not occur. For those that purchased at the peak of the bubble, they need another bubble or they will not get back to breakeven in the next 20 years. If however, there is another bubble, those who purchased at rental equivalent value after the crash will have an opportunity to reap a huge windfall at the expense of those who purchase at inflated prices in the future. As PT Barnum noted, “There is a sucker born every minute.”

Peak Buyer

The speculators who purchased at the peak of The Great Housing Bubble who put no money down (no Initial Equity) and utilized negative amortization loans — and there were a great many of these people — they will have a painful future. The loan balance will be increasing at a time when resale home prices are falling. They will be so far underwater, they will need scuba equipment to survive. Plus, during the worst of their nightmare, their loan will recast, and they will be asked to make a huge payment on a property worth roughly half their loan balance. What default rates will these loans see? Realistically, they will all default. Why wouldn’t they? The only reason they purchased was to capture speculative profits which did not materialize. Even if some of these people hold on, and there is another speculative bubble similar to the last one, it will take 10 years or more for them to get back to breakeven, not including their carry costs. If there is no ensuing bubble, it will be 20 years. If you factor in their holding costs, they may never get back to breakeven.

Conclusion

Equity is made up of several component parts: Initial Equity, Financing Equity, Inflation Equity, and Speculative Equity. Each of these components has different characteristics and different forces that govern how they rise and fall. It is important to understand these components to make wise decisions on when to buy, how much to buy, and how to finance it. Failing to understand the dynamics involved can lead to an equity chart like the one for the peak buyer who purchased at the wrong time and utilized the wrong terms. Nobody wants to suffer that fate.

.

.

BTW, if you want proof that speculators who bought at the peak with no equity will walk in large numbers, please watch the following video:

.

.

Shiller on House Prices

From Calculated Risk:

.

.

I would also like to share with you an email and a series of charts I received from a reader named Kirk:

Hello IrvineRenter,

I thought you might find these charts interesting. I made them from the following sources:

Case-Shiller Housing Price Index for Los Angeles:

http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_csmahp/0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0.html

Effective Federal Funds Rate, 3 Month Treasury Yield, 10 Year Treasury Yield:

http://federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm

Consumer Price Index:

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt

The Y axis represents the various interest rates.

Since the housing price index is an arbitrary number, I scaled it so that it filled the chart from top to bottom.

For the nominal charts, I scaled inflation relative to the first data point for the housing price index – Jan 1987. When housing crosses below the inflation line on the chart it means that the prices were less (in adjusted dollars) than they were Jan 1987.

Some people have been yacking about how the Fed rate cuts are going to prop up housing prices, but if you take a look at the 1987-2000 charts this is obviously not true. The Fed cut rates very aggressively from 1989-1993 and it didn’t stop that slide. They even had more room to cut than they do now.

Take it easy,

Kirk

Los Angeles 1980-2007 Nominal

LA Adjusted

Los Angeles 1980-2007 Inflation Adjusted

National Nominal

Los Angeles 1987-2000 Nominal

National adjusted

Los Angeles 1987-2000 Inflation Adjusted

Crush 'Em

Party time, going down

you better not mess us around

the stakes are rich, take a hit or stay

the price is high, someone’s gonna pay

Looking for trouble, now you’ve found it

you’re a drum and we’re gonna pound it

Last one standing wins the fight

hear us scream and shout all night

down on the floor and eat the grit

this is gonna hurt a little bit

Heads I win, tails you lose

out of my way I’m coming through

roll the dice don’t think twice

and we crush (crush), crush ’em (crush ’em)

Megadeth 2Don’t need reason, don’t want names

just a John Doe to put to shame

step aside let me explain

the name of the game is pain

Now we’ve found you

We’re gonna pound you

We’re gonna beat you

Gonna defeat you

We’re gonna bust you

We’re gonna crush you

We’re gonna crush ’em

Crush ‘Em — Megadeth

.

.

Financial markets can be brutal, particularly for those who speculate. Today’s property was purchased for nearly double its cashflow value as were all the other properties in Northwood II. These properties were all built in 2004 and 2005 near the peak of the housing bubble. Most of them were purchased by speculators, and the featured property today was one of these. So what did the market do? It crushed him…

20 Torrey Pines Front20 Torrey Pines Kitchen

Asking Price: $780,000IrvineRenter

Income Requirement: $195,000

Downpayment Needed: $156,000

Purchase Price: $847,500

Purchase Date: 11/15/2006

Address: 20 North Torrey Pines, Irvine, CA 92620

Beds: 3
Baths: 2
Sq. Ft.: 1,765
$/Sq. Ft.: $442
Lot Size: 5,000 sq. ft.
Type: Single Family Residence
Style: Other
Year Built: 2006
Stories: One Level
Area: West Irvine
County: Orange
MLS#: P618797
Status: Active
On Redfin: 4 days

Gated community, best location next to green belt on the end of the Cul De Sac, bright light open floor plan. Tumbled stone flooring, granite kitchen counter’s, maple cabinets w/ cognac finish. Northwood school district.

Cognac finish? I would rather drink the stuff than finish my cabinets with it.

.

.

If this seller gets their asking price and pays a 6% commission, they will have lost $114,300 in a little over 1 year. Since this price is only 10% off the peak, and we have seen many properties going for 20% or more off peak, this property’s asking price may be $75,000 over market. This speculator may lose over $200,000 in their little foray into the housing market. It is a good thing they are getting out now, properties in this neighborhood could easily drop to near $500,000 in the next couple of years.

Judgement

That concludes another week at the Irvine Housing Blog. Come back next week as we continue chronicling ‘the seventh circle of real estate hell.’ Have a great weekend.

🙂