Monthly Archives: January 2007

The City of Irvine Zoning Map

While reading the thread about the Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, I saw a post by EvaLSeraphim that mentioned a development called Stonegate to be built just north of Woodbury (across Irvine Blvd). I tried to find more information about this but so far I haven’t had much luck.

During my search, I came across the City of Irvine’s Zoning Map:

If you haven’t seen this yet, check it out! This map is dated 1/22/2007 so that’s pretty cool. From looking at this map, you can see that the Landfill is closest to Portola Springs (Planning Area 6).

Casalon – Hoping to break even in Quail Hill

Address: 45 Nightshade, Irvine, CA 92603 (Quail Hill)

Plan: 1553 sq ft – 3/3

MLS: S469390 DOM: 37

Sale History: 3/31/2005: $647,000

11/26/2003: $438,000

Price Reduced: 01/10/07 — $709,000 to $685,000

Current Price: $685,000

This is a former model home in the Casalon tract built by John Laing Homes in the village of Quail Hill. The current owners bought this place almost 2 years ago with 10% down. In December 2006 they put it on the market for $709,000. I’m pretty sure they didn’t get a good response so a few weeks later they dropped the price by $24,000.

It’s also available as a rental (MLS #S469388) for $2700/month (originally at $3000). My guess is that if it sells soon, the price will be pretty close to what they paid for it. If sold at the current asking price (assuming 6% in selling costs), they are looking at a loss of around $3000. And that does NOT include the money they are losing every month while it is sitting there vacant!

You would think that everyone at this point would understand that real estate cannot continue to appreciate indefinitely. But I’m sure there are still tons of misinformed buyers out there. If you come across one, send them this way! 🙂

"Niche Housing"

Today’s OC Register (Marketplace Page 3) runs a modified version of the same story they ran last weekend. It reads more like a builder’s marketing piece than a news article. I wouldn’t be surprised if California Pacific PR people had a hand in its creation.

I was really peeved when I read the first version of this article last week. It stated that Bowen Court (Woodbury) and Vientos (Portola Springs) were designed for singles, part-time parents, and gays and lesbians who wanted to hide their true relationship and appear to be just roommates. I’m not kidding. It really said that! Interestingly, today’s article says nothing about gays and lesbians. Perhaps I was not the only person who was bemused and dumbfounded by that statement?

“Bartender Shaun Karpow didn’t think he could afford to by a house he liked in Orange County, much less Irvine, on his own. He was considering a move to Nevada when a relative told him about a neighborhood in Portola Springs called Vientos, where detached homes are designed for single buyers or a divorced parent who might get the kids on weekends. The homes in the neighborhood range from 990 to 1,405 square feet and are priced from $393,720 to $572,030. Unlike traditional condos and townhouses, buyers own the land the house is on, and there are no shared walls.”

“After choosing some upgrades, Karpow, who is single, paid $450,000 for the 1,087-square-foot “OneXM” model and moved in last month.”

“Homebuilders, real estate experts and marketers said the Vientos project is rare for Orange County.”

“That’s quite unique to find detached homes with that small of a square footage, but that does make it more affordable,” said Linda Mamet, a vice president of sales and marketing for the John Laing Homes’ South Coast Division.”

I find it interesting that Brian Martinez, the author of this article, chose to interview competitor John Laing Homes to provide commentary on this development. I visited John Laing’s “Sendero” in Portola Springs yesterday at their grand opening, and I also visited Laing’s “Four Quartets” when that debuted a few months ago in Woodbury. I found both developments to be ho-hum at best. Many of their floor plans are “carriage-style” with just the garage on the first floor, or just the garage and a tiny study. The kitchens are pretty decent, but the models all felt like upscale apartments to me. I would consider renting one certainly, but I’d never purchase one of these awkwardly-designed townhouses. Sendero’s floor plans run from 1,312 to 1,958 square feet, 2-3 bedrooms, and are listed as starting from $532,880 to $657,880.

All things considered, I like the Vientos/Bowen Court 1,405 square foot Model Four a lot better than any of the Laing offerings. I like the way it offers a small courtyard and, in Woodbury’s version, the builder even offers to open up a wall of the second single car garage to create a loggia off of the living room. That appeals to my desire to enjoy the “indoor-outdoor California lifestyle.” What I don’t like about Model Four is the stupid, stupid, stupid placement of the microwave, at knee level, in the kitchen. They really designed this for part-time parents, huh? Guess the architect, David Ko of Angelino Associates, wasn’t really paying attention when his kids were in the toddler/preschool age. Visions of my pots and pans or, even worse, my cat, being stuck in that kid-friendly-height microwave would keep me from sleeping at night.

Going back to the brochure (oops, I mean the OC Register article), ” ‘One model in Vientos has two equally-sized master bedrooms, which can be purchased by two singles,’ Ko said.”

That was the paragraph that in the previous version of this article, discussed the benefits of such an arrangement for “in-the-closet” homosexuals. I just have nothing at all to say about that selective editing. Good grief.

And finally, “One of the models at Bowen is designed for [part-time parent architect] Ko’s situation. Since the buying power of a single parent tends to be low, Ko looked to cut costs wherever he could. So he designed a two-bedroom house that has a half-bath downstairs and only one full bath upstairs, which the parent shares with his or her children on the days they stay there.”

That would be Residence Two, which is about 1,030 square feet. Back when Vientos first debuted this model was listed from $500,000. Now it’s priced at $445,000.

I am a (almost full-time) single mom. (My son stays with his dad every other weekend.) I do NOT consider my buying power to be all that low. As many readers of our blog already know, I have an MBA and earn $120,000 a year (and will soon earn closer to $130k after my raise next month) in addition to receiving child support every month. I have almost $150,000 stashed in high-yielding CDs from my half of the proceeds of selling our home in January 2006 when we divorced. Given all this, it simply blows my mind that a 20-something BARTENDER paid $450,000 for one of these cramped little units. How the HELL can he afford that much mortgage? Unless mommy and daddy gave him a couple hundred thou as down payment, his monthly payments (including the roughly $1000 per month Mello Roos and HOAs) have got to be close to $3500-$4000! I consider $500,000 to be pushing the top of my sanity limit for a home purchase. And there is no way that ANY of these little units are worth what the builders are asking for them, even after the recent price drops.

Good luck with that creative marketing, friends. Just beware that the majority of the people that I have seen traipsing through your models were moms and dads with little kids. Because whether or not you want to admit it, your little boxes that were not designed for families are still out of reach of most fiscally sane families in Irvine.

Glenneyre at Lanes End – Northwood

Address: 206 Garden Gate, Irvine, CA 92620 (Northwood Pointe)

Plan: 1200 sq ft – 2bd/2.5ba

MLS: S469456 DOM: 22

Sale History: 9/1/2006: $625,000

11/10/2004: $527,500

Current Price: $665,000

This Plan 2 in the Glenneyre at Lanes End tract built by California Pacific Homes in Northwood Pointe was most recently purchased on 9/1/2006 for $625,000 with 5% down. And it went back on the market less than 3 months later. Did someone really buy this home in September 2006 with the intent to flip it?!?! Or could it be a forced relocation or something else?

Anyways, it was relisted at a price $40k higher the day after Christmas. (I’m pretty sure prices did not move up 6.4% since September.) Why $40k? Well if they get their asking price of $665k and we assume 6% in selling costs.. Suprise, surprise, they will have sold their home for the same price they bought it for. Too bad this probably isn’t how it’s going to play out. For $665k there are a lot of other options in Irvine and in this market the seller will be hard pressed to find a GF.

Tract specific pricing and discussions

We’re in the process of accumulating tract specific pricing for the various new home neighborhoods in/around Irvine.  Sometimes it’s nice to know what the exact prices are without having to visit the models or call the sales office up.  All the data we’ve collected is located in our forums here: http://forums.irvinehousingblog.com

Several members have added information they’ve collected and this makes it easy to see how much prices have come down in some of the new neighborhoods (Over $100k drops in some tracts).  If you have info on any of these tracts, I encourage you to share it here.  If you feel like creating a thread for a neighborhood that hasn’t been posted, please do! 🙂

We’ll get back to some blog posts on flips/sales soon!