Using rental parity to find bargain properties

Sep 2nd, 2011  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by irvine_home_owner
2011-09-02 08:26 AM

Nice math post today… my eyes are still crossed.

I would like to see a rundown like this on an Irvine property.

Today’s featured listing’s price is poorly researched, a model match sold for 630k, they are going have a hard time getting $700k. I think the bank has their details wrong, the pictures show it as a Soltice Plan 2, not Plan 3 so the actual square footage is 1840, not 2100 (that’s Plan 3 w/ the extra upstairs room option).

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2011-09-02 11:10 AM

I’m still scratching my eyes looking at the picture of the featured house.  Did TIC really think it was a good idea to cram a couple more houses into this development instead of having a GD sidewalk in front of the house.  This is a sign of the times.  I love the older neighborhoods with sidewalks and a nice parkway between the sidewalk and street.  I guess they weren’t running out of land or developers weren’t quite as greedy 40 years ago.

Astute Observation by Circumnavigate
2011-09-02 09:04 AM

The presentations are at PM not AM right?

Also how did you go about getting the comparable rents, is there a website that will find that information for you?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-09-02 09:21 AM

Yes, the presentations are PM. I obtain comparable rents directly from the MLS. I don’t know of a good website to get this history. You can infer a lot from asking prices on the MLS and Craigslist.

Astute Observation by Justin
2011-09-02 09:42 AM

Good analysis and write up, it’s too bad that these scenarios are difficult to find in Irivne. Vegas is exteremely devalued. Decent SFR’s for under 100k brings in investors.

How about doing a write up on say, Youngtown, Oh or Indianapolis, In? Those cities have even more attractive valuations.

Astute Observation by rkp
2011-09-02 10:42 AM

I pointed this out a few times.  Rental parity doesnt take into account upgrades or large lots very well.  Basically its great for the average house in the development but if one of the houses on an identical tract has a corner lot or is very large, the rental difference doesnt equate with the purchase price difference usually.  That is because what a renter prefers is different than an owner.

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-09-02 10:58 AM

also, it is a freakin pain the move with a family. Simple as that. No dollar amount plug in is going to show what a pain that is. These are where people live. This isn’t some financial instrument that is easy to value.

Moving around apts for “move in specials” year to year gets old really fast.

Try renting a SFR home under a 7 year lease agreement. Let’s see what kind of annual rental increases they will price in. Even at 3%, rents will be 22% higher by the end of the lease.

Also, in NV, there is no personal income tax. So rental parity will always be be lower than CA because the net after tax cost of owning a house is higher in NV while the after tax returns are higher for investors. Just a different type of market. Homes there should always in theory be closer to the “financial modeling” rental parity because of this skewing.

Astute Observation by winstongator
2011-09-02 12:09 PM

Having moved twice in the past year (with a family), and having had a stretch of moving 9/10 summers when single, I agree that moving is a pain.  However, it is a pain that can be dulled considerably with professional movers.

Maybe you haven’t paid attention to the past 10 years, but a good chunk of our country regarded their home as an investment.  Many more used it as collateral in cash-out refinancings to fuel consumption or debt consolidation.  That behavior is hardly the actions of someone who views a home as merely “where they live”.

I would imagine that some landlords would welcome long-term renters.  And the cost of those 3%/yr increases would be weighed against any extra you might pay to own.  You shouldn’t forget about the 6%/sale and other transaction costs with owning that might arise unexpectedly if a move is required.  Costs have to factor into decision making.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-09-02 11:01 AM

The weaknesses you point out are true for any aggregate analysis. The special circumstance properties are always undervalued in Zillow or epraisal or other automated valuation models because those models can’t pick up the unique character of the property.

“That is because what a renter prefers is different than an owner.”

That is only true to a point. Renters like nice properties like owners do, but renters are often not willing to pay what owners are willing to pay to obtain the niceties. Owners over-improve their properties all the time and add little value. Renters may discount these improvements more than other owners, but it isn’t discounted to zero.

Renters will pay more rent for corner lots with greater privacy or granite counter tops and other amenities.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2011-09-02 11:51 AM

IR,
Great analysis.  You had real interest rates for investor instead of the phoney owner occupied teaser rates used by other sellers.  The hard attributes to predict are future rent, repair expense and having enough reserves to survive a long vacancy or bad tenant.  I have not seen such properties in OC or coastal CA.  Some in inland CA with 17% unemployment that may turn into a money pit (sellers used a standard 5% vacancy rate :} that has no touch of reality). How are the true vacancy rates in LV?
I’m tired of looking in CA and may expand outward to LV.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-09-02 04:12 PM

The vacancy rates in Las Vegas are bad. However, when you think about vacancy, the problems tend to be concentrated at the bottom of the housing ladder. A property that rents for $1,200 per month can always find a renter by lowering the rent. A property that rents for $700 per month may not be able to find a warm body with a job no matter how much the rent is lowered. The key to investing in Las Vegas is to stay away from anything renting for less than $850 per month. I prefer SFDs to condos for this reason.

Astute Observation by winstongator
2011-09-02 11:59 AM

Around this condo, there are two ~1500sqft 3/2.5’s, one for sale @ $599k and one for rent @ $2700/mo.  Maybe different models, but seem to be pretty comparable.  $599k seems pretty close to rental parity.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2011-09-02 02:19 PM

In Turtle Rock $2500 to $2800 seems like a sweet point for renting a 3 bedroom condo with additional study room (2000 sf to 2700 sf).  The size varies alot.  For $1700 to $2200 seems to be a sweet spot for a 2 bedroom (900 sf to 2100 sf).  Single family houses seems to rent for more, and apt building for less.  Seems like the apt building in NPB are better value without factoring in the schools.

Astute Observation by working@Irvine
2011-09-02 03:48 PM

asking price: 122900
resale value in year 10: 215.127

annual appreciation rate: 5.75%

It seems too high to me.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-09-02 04:17 PM

I believe prices will decline for another year or two in Las Vegas, and appreciation will be slow for another year or two after that; however, once the supply problems abate, I believe the market will see a significant rebound appreciation up to rental parity levels.

Right now, the only reason more investors are not buying these properties is because they fear values will drop. Once it is widely believed the bottom is in, the 10%+ cap rates will be very attractive. Further, in 3 to 5 years, many people who walked away from their mortgages will be able to buy again. Between the investors who aren’t worried about continued declines, and the owner occupants who are re-entering the buyer pool, I believe prices will go up steeply for several years. Also, once the market has had a year or two of double-digit appreciation, then the kool aid buyers will be participating in full force.

I want to have all the properties I want before the crazies come bid the prices back up again.

Astute Observation by Shabaaz Leroy
2011-09-02 07:14 PM

“I want to have all the properties I want before the crazies come bid the prices back up again”

re: “bid”

take ur time ; it’s gonna’ be a while

Astute Observation by SanJoseRenter
2011-09-05 03:20 AM

IR:

My stomach always gets queasy when people start talking about “rental parity” and “California real estate” in the same sentence.

Substitute “tulip bulb” for “California real estate” and you’ll have the same experience.

After house prices in California decline to the American average of around $192,000, then it makes sense to talk about rental parity.

Until then, you’re just comparing tulip bulbs at bubble prices, which is nonsense.

Astute Observation by palffy
2011-09-06 03:33 AM

Interesting post, IR..

Is there a particular source that you use for your rental parity analysis data?

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main