The Debt Star Has Cleared the Planet

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-04-07 06:37 AM

The cost of ownership is $2600 per month for a 2700 square foot home with a yard in Irvine?

Ring the bell !!!
If you still have a job and your income has increased you are now a winner.

If not, thanks for playing the game.  Better luck next time.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2010-04-07 07:25 AM

No thanks.  I’ll keep my 140K downpayment.  Five years from now, the cost of ownership of this place will be the same or less.  With all the risk out there, there isn’t too much incentive to buy today.

Great job SGIP!!!  Maybe we can have AZDave be the guest writer one day.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-04-07 07:46 AM

You will be wrong about the cost of ownership.  It will be more five years from now.  However the price may be the same or less.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2010-04-07 09:10 AM

You are assuming big interest rate increases.  If we have massive inflation, I should be seeing 15% pay increasing per year…right?

Like I said, buying right now doesn’t make much sense.  It does for you, so you should go out and buy several properties and rent them out!

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-04-07 09:47 AM

This place already rents for more.  There doesn’t have to been any massive inflation.  Five years from now, 6% mortgage rates at the same price would be enough.

Astute Observation by alles_klar
2010-04-07 10:13 AM

How do you know this place rents for more?  I’m not doubting that it does, just wondering what resource you use to determine that.

Astute Observation by Chris
2010-04-07 09:55 AM

That 140k will probably not be worth 140k in today’s dollar in the (near?) future.

Sadly, I’m in the same boat.

Astute Observation by buster
2010-04-07 11:09 AM

Invested wisely, it will be worth far more.  But as interest rates rise, the “value” of the property will be far less.  So your $140,000 will likely be more like a 32% down payment.  Yeah!

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-04-07 12:23 PM

“Invested Wisely”

Care to provide any insight? In this environment, what is considered wise investment?

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2010-04-07 12:33 PM

That’s the way I see it.  Home prices 5 years from now will be lucky to be where they are today.  Here is a hypothical situation:  I have the 140K downpayment today.  I keep renting and save 200K in the next 5 years.  If this house still is 700K in 5 yrs, I can put down almost 50%.  Meanwhile, I have not exposed myself to any additional risks from buying today.  Seems like a much better solution, it just requires patience.

Astute Observation by tacoshark
2010-04-07 01:09 PM

However, factor in that you are throwing $2000-$3000 away a month on renting the place you’re at. Over 5 years, take the average $2500 rent for SFH and that comes to $150,000 gone. Renting isn’t free.

Astute Observation by Marc
2010-04-07 01:26 PM

He is probably renting for less than that. Also, the place above requires monthly cash outlays of $3,700, way more than you will ever pay in rent. And renting gives me the flexibility to relocate on short notice and not being stuck with an overpriced property in Irvine.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2010-04-07 07:18 PM

If the whole purpose is to save money for a few years, you can rent cheap.  I pay $1500/month for a nice apartment 1 block from the beach.  If you have kids and need a bigger place, that might change things.  For a person in my situation, it makes sense to rent and wait out the storm.

Astute Observation by Eat that!
2010-04-07 09:59 AM

Right because everyone has an extra $140K lying around and making $140K/yr.  Yep, that’s everybody.  What is amazing is that it will sell and eventually it will go into default and it will end up sitting with another squatter.  Free homes for everybody!  That’s my plan and I’m sticking with it.

Astute Observation by Rental parity
2010-04-07 11:20 AM

I would not have thought so but the subject property is at ~ rental parity when considering the potential income-tax savings and equity hidden in payment. A friend of mine rents in Northwood a 2,500 sq.ft. house for $2,900/month.

Still, the $3,800 monthly outlay is substantial and would require two good incomes.

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-04-07 12:17 PM

That sure sounds good, but I believe right now it doesn’t scale very well. Suppose I want a 1500 square foot home, the monthly cost of ownership surely isn’t anywhere near $1500.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-04-07 12:35 PM

A 1500 square foot home in Irvine rents for between 2200 and 2500 depending on how nice it is..

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-04-07 08:53 AM

The house has seven bedrooms?  I guess if you have six kids this is the place for you.  Or maybe a frat house or a boarding house.  Rent out each bedroom for $500-800 a month and I guess you could make a profit.

I’m not sure why you are amazed that they paid $800k in 2004.  Redfin’s “Nearby Similar Sales” indicates it’s worth almost that much ($778,453) today.

Astute Observation by tonyE
2010-04-07 10:34 AM

Yep, this place should rent rather well as a boarding house.  You could put in your manager/cleaner/maintenance person for free in the two downstairs bedrooms and then have five renters upstairs.

I figure at 700 bucks a month you got 3500 bucks with no hassle.  That should net around 500 bucks a month after insurance and taxes.

6000 per year from $140K comes out to over 4% which is more than you get in a CD.  No hassle, built in manager.

If you wanted to be really cheap, then you could cut the bennies for your manager to only one bedroom and then you got six bedrooms for rent. 
That’s about 4200/mo gross, 1200/mo net, or $14K a year.  A return of almost 10%.

I suppose that all those bedrooms are legal?

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-04-07 02:31 PM

The bedrooms may not be legal.  The “Public Facts” portion of the Redfin entry says it’s a 4 bed/2.5 bath with 2,078 sq ft, while the listing calls it a 7 bed/3.75 bath with 2,770 sq ft.  But it’s also possible the tax records missed a permitted addition.

In any case, SFRs with huge numbers of legal bedrooms do exist (sometimes they are even built that way to begin with).  Cities and other local governments rarely restrict the number of bedrooms or total square footage of a house, provided there are adequate setbacks from the house to the property lines.  Now, local governments frequently prevent additional full units on a lot zoned for SFR (you can’t build a second house in most cases), but building a 12 bedroom 7 bath house-no problemo.

Astute Observation by tonyE
2010-04-07 02:39 PM

My understanding is that there are limits in Irvine on the number of residents per household.  I think the number is predicated on garage size and parking. 

For example, building a fifth bedroom home is more difficult now that when we did it in Y2K.  I think my neighbor mentioned that he needs a three car garage to build a 5th bedroom.

I suppose those of us who built before the zoning changes would be grandfathered by the old rules.

Phew….

Astute Observation by cran
2010-04-07 09:01 AM

We keep hearing about the coming foreclosure wave for months now (probably years), but yet the foreclosures are not here. What makes you think that this time it is different?

I am waiting to buy in Irvine/Tustin Ranch for a few years now, but the prices are still at unbelievable high levels. In 2007 I thought I am going to buy in 2008/2009, then in 2008 I thought I am going to buy at the end of 2009, and here I am in April 2010 and I haven’t bought yet because prices are still too high.

I guess my question is what is different this time than last time(s) when everybody was convinced that the foreclosure wave is forming, it is going to be huge and is hitting soon? Is it because the Fed has stopped buying MBS? Is it because that BofA guy said that BofA will increase foreclosures? Is it because HAMP/HAFA etc have failed? Is it because the tax credit is ending? Is it because of a combination of all these factors?

Is this another tactic by banks to increase foreclosures for 1-2 months to make the government launch another stupid program to save the nation?

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-04-07 09:21 AM

You need to understand that fractional reserve banking is a made up game of bullshit numbers.  You can keep faking it and will never lose provided you have grown large enough to destroy the economy.

Astute Observation by Eat that!
2010-04-07 10:02 AM

Or until it becomes more profitable to foreclose on your broke a$$ and kick you out.  That’s the draw back of an up market.  So you might not want to wish for increased appreciation just yet.

Astute Observation by Walter
2010-04-07 09:27 AM

I know exactly how you feel and wonder the exact same things.

But every time I think of buying, I get cold feet when I come to the conclusion the downside risks are greater then the upside risks.

I am going to do some serous soul searching on buying towards the end of the year after all these changes are working in to the market, or the the gov has bailed us out AGAIN!

Astute Observation by Chris
2010-04-07 10:07 AM

Cran, people like you and a lot more folks in Irvine who are not housedebtors are probably the reason that Irvine has not seen a huge housing price reduction (i.e. waiting to buy).

Tell me, by replacing the words “Irvine/Tustin Ranch” with the word “Detroit” in your comment above, would the rest of the words still stick? I bet you that you could probably be pass off as a landowner in Detroit by now if you were to sink your money in that city.

Sadly, you probably won’t see much more drop in Irvine even if all the stimuli have been exhausted. The best that you can probably hope for is a repeat of early ‘09 price.

That’s just my 2c.

Astute Observation by cran
2010-04-07 11:38 AM

“Sadly, you probably won’t see much more drop in Irvine even if all the stimuli have been exhausted. The best that you can probably hope for is a repeat of early ‘09 price.”

Chris, that may be true, who knows. No one has a crystal ball to see the future. Maybe there are enough people that will overpay and sustain the market as it is. Maybe the large number of notices of default that we see now are because homeowners try to get a mod and they default intentionally, but they will cure whether or not they get the mod.

However, I am curious to see where the market will move when all government programs will end or will fail.

I still have hope that prices will come down to earth because I believe the market is not healthy as long as the government is involved in it.

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-04-07 12:34 PM

As much as it hurts to say this, I’m starting agree with one of Planet Reality’s observations: we’ve recently taken part in a *massive* transfer of wealth.

The pretenders are getting kicked out (foreclosed), and those with money are moving in. The definition of “normal” has changed. It all comes down to how many non-pretenders are in Irvine.

I don’t have a crystal ball and I’m not financially comfortable paying today’s prices in Irvine (rent or buy), so Irvine is simply out of the question for me.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-04-07 12:58 PM

IMHO Irvine isn’t that nice.  There are far nicer places to live in South OC that cost 20% less for more land.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-04-07 02:50 PM

Depends on the definition of “nice”.  Irvine does possess the combination of very low crime and very highly ranked schools.  It is those two things that drive up prices in the city.

Astute Observation by cran
2010-04-07 03:39 PM

Planet Realty,

I agree that there are nicer places in South OC that are also cheaper than Irvine. One place that I like in particular is Dana Point.

However, South OC does not come without the disadvantage that you have to drive to a nearby employment center. If you factor in the time to drive from Dana Point to Irvine, the cost of gas and possibly toll road and the need to replace/repair your car more often, you may end up paying more for the same house in Dana Point.

Now I may be different than others, but I really hate driving more than 15-20 minutes to work.

Astute Observation by Chris
2010-04-07 11:29 PM

“I still have hope that prices will come down to earth…”

What’s your price definition for *earth*?

Irvine’s *earth* price is probably more than other locations in OC except for Newport area.

Astute Observation by cran
2010-04-08 08:35 AM

“What’s your price definition for *earth*?”

2000 - 2001 prices

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-04-07 09:06 AM

Beds: 7
Baths: 3 full 1 part baths
Home size: 2,770 sq ft
($252 / sq ft)

Why go to Europe for a vacation when you can live in Irvine.  These European style bedrooms will take you to Europe with the tiny hotel room feeling.

Buy before your priced out of the market.
If the interest rates goes up, the sale price should go down and monthly mortgage payment will go up a little and RE taxes down.  I would rather leave with my debt settled than doing a walkaway with either loss downpayment or leaving fellow taxpayers holding the bag. 

Note: I wrote taxpayer and not the bank, because the banks are just transferring the bad loans to the Fed, who transferrs the bad loans to the taxpayers.

Scotty, Beam me up.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-04-07 03:09 PM

2,770 sq ft is sufficient for 7 bedrooms and 3.75 baths, IMHO.  The bedrooms could be 15’ x 15’ each, the baths 10’ x 10’ each, and that would leave about 800 sq ft for the kitchen and living room.  From the listing, it also looks like some of the bedrooms could be more like a den or a dining room that could be counted as a bedroom only if you stretch things.

Astute Observation by John
2010-04-07 09:08 AM

This is what I don’t understand:

When people stop paying their mortgages, who absorbs the month-to-month loss on the nonperforming loans?

If it’s the MBS investors, then won’t they demand the bank or loan servicers to foreclose?

If the loan is on the banks’ balance sheets, then why don’t we hear them loose more?  (maybe they’re making up the loss with profit from other business?)

Another question:

This house went into auction.  If nobody bid, then it belongs to the bank, right?  So how come it still belongs to these people (the owner)?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-04-07 11:23 AM

John,

When the debtor stops paying, often the servicer is required to make the payment for the debtor and add it to the loan balance (it is a loan from servicer to investor). The investor still receives his money, but the value of the investment is deteriorating because the investors are basically paying themselves. If it is a GSE or FHA loan, those entities will pay the investor and eat the loss.

Ordinarily, banks would be required to recognize the loss when the loan goes bad, but with suspension of market-to-market accounting rules, lenders do not need to take their write downs and impact their balance sheet.

Right now, banks are borrowing money from the FED at 0% and loaning it to home buyers at 5%, so the spreads are rebuilding their capital base. Now that they have enough reserves, they can take the write downs.

This house hasn’t gone to auction yet. It is scheduled for auction, but the lender keeps postponing as part of the amend-pretend-extend dance. That is one of the big things that is going to change now that the government is streamlining the short-sale process.

Astute Observation by Chris
2010-04-07 11:36 PM

“If it is a GSE or FHA loan, those entities will pay the investor and eat the loss.”

This is true. I have Ginnie Mae bond fund and the govt is currently eating the loss on the interest payments.

Sadly, taxpayers (including myself) will inherit this loss. Oh well, at least I’m paying myself grin

Astute Observation by Walter
2010-04-07 09:32 AM

Side question for IR.

We own a strip mall and now own a small plot of land next to it. We want to expand the parking lot. Do you know any good contractors that do paving/parking lot work?

The lot is near USC.

Thanks in advance if you can help with this.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-04-07 11:26 AM

I see All American Asphalt everywhere. I haven’t managed any paving construction in several years, so I don’t have any first-hand recommendations.

Astute Observation by Walter
2010-04-07 04:40 PM

Many thanks for the info. I will contact them for a proposal.

Keep up the top quality blogging.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-04-07 10:20 AM

Greenspan Passes The Buck on Financial Crisis.

Blames “the Congress” for encouraging so much homeownership.

Claims that the Fed “warned” of subprime mortgages but apparently did nothing because “the Congress” would have “clamped down” on them.

Since when does the Federal Reserve answer to the Congress now?  I thought the whole reason for not auditing them was to preserve their Holier Than Thou Independence so they can make those politically unpopular decisions.

How can this little lemming take ZERO blame for himself?  Yes, the economy was destroyed by a flood of easy money rushed into the system that we created from thin air but it’s not our fault for not keeping the politicians sober.  It’s not our fault for pouring all that alcohol and getting everybody drunk as a skunk.  The drunks should have exercised sober thought!  Don’t blame the bartender!

Astute Observation by Chris
2010-04-07 11:44 PM

“How can this little lemming…”

AZ, he’s not a lemming but a vanguard of the bubble.

Bernokio, however, takes the crown by 1% (ZIRP).

Astute Observation by fisher
2010-04-07 11:08 AM

What are the things Irvine city council members really concerns: Great park, Great park and Great park. In last two elections the spot light is Great park. Do not surprise if next election’s topic still Great park. Maybe city council members should ask Irvine company for next election theme so they know what to do for the election.

IMHO, the major problem now for Irvine is too many zone conversions with too many new 4th floors apartments allow to be built after the master plan is set (a beautiful back door strategy). This cause traffic congestion and over-clouded school.

The excuse of conversion being allowed is the demand. But I am afraid its just too much $$$$$ for Irvine company to take, I image from zone conversion, Irvine company may make more than $1 billion in last of few years and I am not sure what benefits council members can get from this.

IMHO, from now on, any zone conversion needs to be approved by majority of Irvine home owners. Otherwise, at least 50% of the amount money that IAC make from zone conversion should inject into Irvine school district and Irvine city.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-04-07 11:31 AM

Personally, I don’t mind the conversions from commercial to residential because those actually decrease traffic. A commercial or office complex generates more traffic than high-density apartments.

The Irvine Company was looking for a place to invest its cash (they have huge positive cashflow and little or no debt). Apartments are an investment they can do today with immediate return. They would be waiting another 5-7 years for more commercial.

I am not sure how this impacts the schools. I am not sure which school children living near the Spectrum would go to. They paid huge impact fees when they build the development, so whatever impact there was, the Irvine Company paid for it.

Astute Observation by tonyE
2010-04-07 11:38 AM

With the exception of Northwood, The whole area East of the Santa Ana Fwy is a mess. 

They started to build homes alongside the “proposed” tollway back in ‘90 but the homeowners were not told that the nearest on ramp would require a toll… I remember seeing the model homes and the implication was that the toll would be to go “over the hill” not down to the Santa Ana Fwy (for which there is no connector road either…).

To make matters worse they went nuts since Y2K building homes up there.  Which even with Beckman HS is straining the school systems, huh?  The traffic sucks, the density is terrible, some of them are not even in Irvine, but they call themselves “West Irvine”... even though they are NE of Irvine… WTH.

IMHO, we should change their phone area code to the 909 (except for Northwood… is it still 714 out there???).

It’s gonna be carnage, prices will indeed come down to earth, but you know what?  By the time we see carnage in West Irvine it will be Armageddon in the rest of the area.

Astute Observation by Pure speculation
2010-04-07 12:16 PM

Regardless of whether West Irvine is an appropriate designation, West Irvine is actually holding up pretty good and there’s nothing messy about it. The same goes for Tustin Ranch, Tustin.
If carnage is going to happen, then it will be all or most of Irvine. Now, I imagine Woodbury is more vulnerable due to its newness and the higher M.R. fees. Yes, the area code is 714 in W Irvine but it’s 949 in Northwood but who cares?

Astute Observation by tonyE
2010-04-07 02:36 PM

All the NEW areas are most susceptible to big drops in price because everyone will be upside down. 

The newer the subdivision the worse off.

The OLD areas have still significant equity and a lot more room to go down without panicking.  Not everyone dipped into HELOC hell.

Thus, the carnage will be felt more significantly in the newer areas, including Turtle Ridge and Quail Hill.

Additionally, the closer to the ocean the more mild the carnage will be… except of course for TRidge and Quail Hill which were priced accordingly at nose bleed prices from day one.

Astute Observation by Will anyone listen?
2010-04-07 01:00 PM

Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer, On Wednesday April 7, 2010, 3:07 pm
WASHINGTON (AP)—A Federal Reserve official says the Fed should start boosting interest rates “soon,” warning that delay could eventually unleash inflation. He does not specify when it should act.

Thomas Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, in a speech in New Mexico raises concerns about leaving rates at record lows for too long. He suggests the Fed soon start moving its key rate—now near zero—toward 1 percent.

When rate increases are delayed, “the outcome too often is greater inflation, significant credit and market imbalances, and an eventual financial crisis,” he says.

Hoenig, a member of the Fed’s interest-rate setting committee, opposed the committee’s pledge at its past two meetings to hold rates at record lows for an “extended period.”

Astute Observation by Chris
2010-04-07 11:39 PM

Hoenig will be the fire that will lid the massive gas buildup in this current bubble.

Just watch what will happen if ZIRP is abandoned. Not even mark-to-fantasy will assuage the potential blowup.

Astute Observation by Sac_Boomer
2010-04-07 01:44 PM

The utter unfairness and morale hazard is painful to watch. If I were to stop making mortgage payments, my servicer would ask me politely to continue, and if I failed to comply, they would be forced to ask me politely again. If one of my kids skipped their rent, the sherrif would be assisting them to the street.Great post SGIP!

Astute Observation by Joe Manausa
2010-04-07 04:00 PM

Very well written, thank you. My favorite line (which I might have to borrow) “as I observed the housing bubble go from OMG to WTF”

I think the shadow inventory nationwide is much larger than anybody has considered and we might get your ‘How Star Wars IV Should Have Ended’ ending.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-04-07 08:42 PM

” Greenspan: ‘I was right 70% of the time’ – CNNMoney.com “

Like saying “I was right 1 out of 9 times having my neighbor’s kids playing Russian Roulette.” 

Did he have a significant amount of his money at risk?

SGIP, very funny but educational.  Loan modification to back-end the payments.  $1430 premod to $838 postmod for x years.  Are they modifying the loans into 2 loans one for a trustee sale on the primary loan and a second loan to go after the other assess later?  If so, the unsuspecting home owners are walking into a TRAP.  Like Esau selling his long-term birthright for a quick meal.  But at least the “owner” can pay some rent and squat longer.  The banks can unload the non-preforming loan the Fed.  Welcome to the dark side.

Astute Observation by theyenguy
2010-04-07 09:27 PM

Thanks for your articles; they are consistently insightful; I do have two comments.

You relate: “There is a reason we have a foreclosure process: when people stop paying, we need to get them out of the property and recycle it to someone who will pay for it”. My reply: the foreclosure process will not make properties available at an affordable price; so the homes will go vacant; statistics show that nationwide vacancy is at 13%; it will be going up.

And you relate: ” I reasoned we would have an orderly foreclosure process that would bring must-sell inventory to the market and lower prices. It never occurred to me that lenders would simply not foreclose on people and allow borrowers to squat. It didn’t seem possible. I am not terribly surprised by what lenders have done, but I don’t see how it solved their problem.”

My reply is that not foreclosing solved a very big problem that being a loss on the income statement reducing their balance sheet capital. Under the interpretation of FASB, the banks have been able to carry the loans at mark to fantasy, not mark to market. In the last year the Ben Bernanke Portfolio, that is Financial Revenue Shares, RWW, ETF increased 96%; today it turned down 0.4% as the stock market has now turned from Bull to Bear now that the Fed’s Quantative Easing has ended and a new financial quarter begun and Moody’s Downgraded $1.9 Trillion Of Subprime RMBS. 

So yes, now, the Banks, as you have reported will start foreclosing and short selling; but the economic downdraft that is coming is going to be another Great Depression; and Los Angeles is going to be an epicenter of economic desolation as its debt was downgraded just today; the net result is going to be very little house buying and a lot of empty houses.

Astute Observation by flyovercountry
2010-04-08 09:09 AM

I know that a lot of OC residents don’t care to hear about prices in other areas of the country, and compare any place between the coasts to Detroit…

But prices are at levels where buying can make sense in other parts of the country.

I’ve been following this blog for a couple years now to give me some insight about what the economy was likely going to do.  If I just looked real estate in OC, there is NO WAY I could be willing to buy a house right now.

Fortunately I am not in CA. I just bought a 2800 sq foot house on 1/3 of an acre, 3 bedroom 2 full, 2 1/2 baths, 5 car garage, covered porch, full basement.  granite, stainless steel, and ceramic kitchen, built in 1995.  Cost was less than $118 per square foot.  That is less than the construction price alone.

This is not in Detroit, but in Columbus OH.  Which is a bit grey in the winters for my preference, but it is certainly not Fargo cold.  We have a diversified job base, a major university, good airport, reasonable crime rate and schools, and a large number of bike paths, parks, and resevoirs. 

A spike in interest rates would hit the value of my new house, but it can’t realistically reduce it too much when it already costs less than replacement value even ignoring the cost of the land.

I can’t see increased foreclosures in the big 5 really hurting my values in the long run, so bring it on.  The sooner we work our way through that mess the better.  The only reason I like extend and pretend is that it helps squeeze a little more money out of the people who overextended themselves, which reduces the cost to banks and taxpayers.

Astute Observation by NOT
2010-04-08 04:01 PM

Totally unrelated AND off topic but IR, I noticed you were interested in this on the weekend: Saturn’s Strange Hexagon Recreated in the Lab.  IR Feel free to delete this note.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main