The Bernanke Put: The Implied Protection of Mortgage Interest Rates

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by winstongator
2010-03-01 05:13 AM

Keeping interest rates low in the face of falling/stabilizing prices is one thing, keeping them low in the face of rapid increases (G’span) is another.  Your armageddon scenario would be much worse than the other two because of the collateral damage, unemployment, actual destruction of housing stock in disgruntled foreclosures, etc.

BigBen also is dealing with the nation, not just Irvine.  In SEFla, prices are pretty much as 2000-2003 levels depending on the area.  In many places, the bubble has popped and they are in recovery mode.

Purchase mortgage apps are down because purchases are down, no the other way around.  When the tax credit was expiring in Nov, a huge amount of demand was pulled forward, demand that’s not around now.  I always wondered that if a super option-arm with no documentation needed didn’t get all the on-the-fence home buyers into the market, why would an 8k credit do it?  There aren’t many renters waiting to move in and buy (in most of the country, Irvine prices still have some room to fall).  Combine that with people’s low interest rate refi’s, and you will have low existing home sales for a while, and even lower once rates increase.

I was talking to a mortgage banker at a big, but not too-big-to-fail bank that has weathered the storm about as good as any.  He mentioned that after the 2003 wave of refi’s only a small fraction of their loan book was more than a year or so old - 10% is the number the pops to my head.  Any idea now at the average age of a mortgage?  It really is like a reset button has been hit…twice in the naughties.  Problem is, we don’t have another shot at a reset.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-03-01 07:25 AM

If you want to understand where interest rates can and will be take a look at Japan.

As Japanese debt increased dramatically over a 20 year period, interest rates on debt kept getting lower and lower.

Believe it or not, the US has plenty of room to ramp up debt when compared to Japan.  Expect this to drag on for a long time with low interest rates for debt probably getting lower.

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2010-03-01 12:43 PM

Planet Reality,

I agree, but am very conflicted.  The reason that Japan was able to take on this level of debt is because they have such a strong saving class, which made their government debt a better risk.

We have household and government deficits to the sky.  We are a much bigger risk than Japan.  We also spend like drunken sailors.  I wouldn’t lend money to us at these rates; I can only assume this is debt monetization; trying to force inflation with a combo monetary/fiscal one-two punch.  Any other theories?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-03-01 01:11 PM

“I can only assume this is debt monetization; trying to force inflation with a combo monetary/fiscal one-two punch.  Any other theories?”

That is how I see it. Bernanke as an academic wrote about this scenario, and so far, he is doing what he said he would as an academic. He will print money in any form he can—mortgages were expedient—until inflation starts, and then we can only hope he turns the printing press off.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-03-01 07:25 PM

Chuck and IR,

The best part is that the US can have it both ways.

The US can print all the money it wants and has plenty of savers for all the debt the US wants.  You didn’t think the savers had to live in the US did you?  Ultimately this will end badly but given the current state of debt to GDP versus the rest of the world I am confident it can continue 50 to 100+ years.  It’s a long slow burn to the collapse.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-03-01 08:41 AM

Is it the lighting in the photo, or are the cabinets mismatched in the kitchen? If this is a renovation warranting a 35% increase in value, I don’t see it.

Astute Observation by Long Beach Renter
2010-03-01 11:15 AM

I think they’re mismatched. But the photography is definitely weird—- it makes it look like there isn’t a right angle in the whole house. I felt almost dizzy looking at these pictures.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-03-01 09:03 AM

When you take the time to ponder the consequences of mortgage rates at 6 - 10%, it’s easy to conclude rates will stay low.

I predict a flatter ice scenario for Irvine, but a deeper ice scenario for most of Orange County.  Irvine might even get back to peak pricing faster.

Astute Observation by Stock Investor
2010-03-01 09:05 AM

“The Federal Reserve will intervene if problems become too big.”

There are limits to government’s power. High unemployment, budget deficit and upcoming inflation may be more serious issues than housing market.

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-03-01 04:03 PM

Free market forces will eventually limit this BS. I hope it comes sooner than later.  I embrace viability.  It seems everyone else justifies playing musical chairs forever to avoid the inevitable.  Children.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2010-03-01 09:51 AM

That is one ugly house, it looks like it started as a one story rancher and then a box was added on top of the garage.  Anybody who pays almost 800K for this is completely insane.

Regarding interest rates, I’m sure Big Ben and the other stooges already have their memos written for extending the MBS purchase program.  This current economy won’t function with higher rates, it barely functions as is.  That’s ok, we’ll just have the next few generations clean up this collosal mess.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-03-01 09:53 AM

http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/where-home-prices-are-rising

Are these real, oranges to oranges or apples to oranges comparisons?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-03-01 11:00 AM

Yes, the data is accurate.

“Inventory has dropped in these markets, suggesting demand is up, and prices in California rose overall from January 2009 to August 2009.”

The mistake is obvious in this sentence; inventory dropped but since volume is down 20% below historic norms, demand is clearly not up.

Astute Observation by freedomCM
2010-03-01 12:01 PM

While median price is up, that reflects the sales mix. 

Case-Shiller is flat.

I guess flat is the new “up”?

Astute Observation by LC
2010-03-01 12:12 PM

I know that I have gotten flack before for mentioning Hemet. But that was when I thought that prices for almost new 3000 sq ft house around $187k were simply impossible to ignore by the good people of Irvine. Well, guess what? These prices are down to $99k.

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-03-01 01:56 PM

Now is a great time to buy investment homes in Hemet! For less than the price of a downpayment on an Irvine condo, you could own a home outright in Hemet and rent it out should you decide not to live there! Positive cashflow!

A good friend of mine owns two rental homes in Hemet, and you’d never guess, but it’s not easy finding quality reliable renters out that way. I happen to like the area and wouldn’t mind living there, but there are no jobs available in my line of work, and my wife’s not fond of the desert.

Astute Observation by NOT
2010-03-01 02:11 PM

lowrydr310,  I love the contradictions between the first par above and the second:
Par 1: Great time to invest
Par 2: No jobs, hard to find renters, not fond of the desert

hmmmmm….. Makes one think it may not be a great time to invest as one’s “investment” may sit empty.  Sort of takes away from “Positive cashflow!”

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-03-01 02:49 PM

Sarcasm my friend. I guess it’s not as obvious in my writing as I thought.

Sarcasm in the first paragraph.
Seriousness in the second. My friend and his parents own several homes in Hemet that are rented out. Some have worked out, while others haven’t. Overall I don’t think it’s worth the effort as they’re always fixing something, trying to rent out, collecting the rent, etc. Ten years ago it was relatively stable; now not so much.

Astute Observation by winstongator
2010-03-01 04:57 PM

It was obvious to me smile.  When an ! comes after ‘great time to invest’ always have an eye out for sarcasm.

Astute Observation by NOT
2010-03-01 02:03 PM

So, if you are talking about the houses that say “Investor Cash Sale!! Home can not be occupied per the City of Hemet. Former Model Home in Peppertree Development. 5 Models being sold together or separate. All Buyers must sign disclosures (see supplements) prior to offer submissions. Properties are in a senior retirement community. “

I am sure that does not count.

Astute Observation by Soylent Green Is People
2010-03-01 10:02 AM

The MBS extension whispers started literally hours after the Fed gave a March termination date for the program. Never consider the loud headlines, but listed for the still, soft voices saying otherwise.


As long as your not the only one hearing those said same voices, of course…. Did I just say that out loud?

My .02c

Soylent Green Is People.

Astute Observation by Alan
2010-03-01 11:24 AM

“How much speculation is occurring due to buyer’s beliefs in perpetual government supports?”

If the government is going to support the market for the next several years, doesn’t this open up a window of opportunity for flippers and speculators to do their thing? They just have to make a guess about how much and how long the support will be there, and try to get out before a significant rate rise.

Astute Observation by quailoverthehill
2010-03-01 11:44 AM

Is there any corner of Irvine that a Realtard won’t call “highly sought-after,” “desireable” or “exclusive”? College Park is bounded on the south by the Amtrak and Metrolink tracks (“You’ll get used to it”) and the houses are approaching 40 years old, which, in Irvine, is almost prehistoric. What IS highly desireable is the near-absence of HOA fees and no Mello-Roos.

Astute Observation by Soylent Green Is People
2010-03-01 12:49 PM

The HARP program (Home Affordable Refinance Program) has been extended to 2011 as per recent press release. If it’s been extended AND rate are suppoosed to go up, what good is extending the program. A sign, IMHO, that the Fed will continue MBS purchases.

My .02c

Soylent Green Is People.

Astute Observation by tonye
2010-03-01 01:23 PM

I love Jim Croce’s songwriting and singing.

Actually, when it comes to Croce’s songs, the best fit to Bernanke would be Bad Leroy Brown, after all they’re both GAMBLERS…

....
And it’s bad, bad Leroy Brown
The baddest man in the whole damn town
Badder than old King Kong
And meaner than a junkyard dog

Now Leroy he a GAMBLER
And he like his fancy clothes
And he like to wave his diamond rings
In front of everybody’s nose
He got a custom Continental
He got an Eldorado too
He got a 32 gun in his pocket for fun
He got a razor in his shoe
...

Great songs.

Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-03-01 01:24 PM

A title search would turn up a previous owner, one D. Downer.

Based on the haunting photographs, this is a home is a place for depression and regret; for learning afresh each day that hell is an endless conversation with oneself. A negative force sucks you into each image, beckoning your psyche into a closed loop of self-absorption and alienation.

The non-rectilinear photo of the façade suggests that the house itself is rearing up in preparation to strike at the viewer. The patio photo beckons you toward a dark place, uncertain only in its particulars, but not in its finality. The reticulated kitchen flooring places you in a chessboard worthy of Dali: the pieces may meet at right angles in the foreground, but as they move away, who’s to say what at what angle they ever met?

The remaining photos of bedroom interiors are the final, decisive clanging shut of the prison door of depression. Each has just enough light from a far-distant window to allow one to contemplate the futility of the treadmill on which we march to nowhere but death. Perfect rooms in which to awaken each morning, as Philip Larkin:

  I work all day, and get half drunk at night.
  Waking at four to soundless dark, I stare.
  In time the curtain edges will grow light.
  Till then I see what’s really always there:
  Unresting death, a whole day nearer now,
  Making all thought impossible but how
  And where and when I shall myself die.

...

  And so it stays just on the edge of vision,
  A small unfocused blur, a standing chill
  That slows each impulse down to indecision
  Most things may never happen: this one will,
  And realisation of it rages out
  In furnace fear when we are caught without
  People or drink. Courage is no good:
  It means not scaring others. Being brave
  Lets no-one off the grave.
  Death is no different whined at than withstood.

Or Auden:

  The glacier knocks in the cupboard,
  The desert sighs in the bed,
  And the crack in the tea-cup opens
  A lane to the land of the dead.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-03-01 04:07 PM

Bravo! Thank you for brightening my day.

Astute Observation by avobserver
2010-03-01 02:22 PM

I wish Bernanke had an option not to stop buying RMBS …
It should be obvious to many by now that the whole US (as well as most of the nations in the developed world) economy over the last 20 years resembles nothing but a house of cards – economic prosperity/expansion and low unemployment were built on fast growth in consumption which was in turn built on easy credit/debt and wealth effect induced by appreciation of asset price, which was in turn built on expansion of bank lending, which was in turn built on rapid house price appreciation that support the underlying securitized debt, which in turn was supported by Fed’s low interest rate policy at the very bottom. Fed’s 0% rate and QE (buying MBS and Treasury) is about the only thin layer of glue that holds the house of cards together (at least for the time being). Remove the prop the whole thing collapses - not just house prices, but the entire economy.
The thing about a Ponzi scheme is that once it is set in motion there is no turning back. It is strictly a one way street. You need to keep going by increasing the bet but the moment you think about reversing the course, game is over. In the next several years Bernanke will have no choice but to up the ante every time the previous stimulant begins to wear off. Not only will helicopter Ben not stop buying MBS, he is far more likely to buy ever larger quantity of MBS down the road to keep this Ponzi scheme going. If Japan experience is of any indication, it won’t be far-fetched to envision the US mortgage rate to eventually slide down to 2-3% range. As more and more demand gets pulled forward it will take increasingly larger incentives to boost “affordability” and entice people to buy. But buyers will soon figure this out and opt to wait for even lower rates or sweeter deals.
When subprime loans imploded in 2007 we probably all thought that was the end of the whole Ponzi scheme. But as it turned out housing correction was only a road bump for the schemers. Central banks around the world have far more chips to dispense to get the game going than I had ever imagined. Here at home Bernanke should keep the re-inflating going for at least another 3-4 years. With USD as the world reserve currency Fed is free to monetize debt.  So just relax, go get yourself some popcorns, find a good seat, and enjoy the show… it amazes me just how any society built on saving, sound investment and productive innovation, would one day mutate into something that’s all about mindless consumption and wild financial chicanery.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-03-01 03:21 PM

Ben is between a rock and a hard place, but we do not know if he sees it.  If he allows free market interest rates to rise, as they would without Fed intervention, the US treasury and all civic issuers of debt would not be able to roll over their present paper or be able to pay the interest on their debt.  The US federal government alone must roll over $5 tril in the next 18 months.

China has already started selling their US paper and if Ben does not allow interest rates to rise, they will sell much more, and Japan may sell theirs, causing massive inflation and a rise in interest rates.

There is no where for Ben to go or anything for him to do.  Toast

Astute Observation by Muzie
2010-03-01 04:13 PM

Ben can’t see he’s between a rock and a hard place, but random commenters on a blog are right there on the pulse of the world economy?

Puuulease. Sometimes the level of arrogance around here is staggering.

I could believe Bernanke is deceitful, somewhat conniving, and with a less-than-completely-fleshed-out-plan; then again most people seem pretty short on solutions to fix the problem that don’t involve draconians measures that would get any president in office voted out in a second.

But I don’t think the man is dumb. He may have his vested interests, yet so do many people around here nowadays.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-03-01 05:45 PM

It may be arrogant, but I have right more than Ben Bernanke has.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-03-01 07:37 PM

I have BEEN right more than ...

Astute Observation by Muzie
2010-03-02 03:26 PM

It matters very little that you were more right or wrong.

It matters if you think with all your worldly economic experience, you think you would have the knowledge, skills and connections required to replace him and succeed in setting an entire country towards a better future path than he has.

From my point of view of reading passing anonymous commenters on a blog, that seems like a pretty preposterous proposition.

Astute Observation by avobserver
2010-03-01 06:38 PM

A pedigree neoliberal thinker like Bernanke is a prisoner of his own rigid doctrine. Given the choice between reality and his plutonic theories he would choose the latter without blinking his eyes. How else would you explain the fact that he completely missed the housing bubble back in 2005 when many “random” and “arrogant” blog commenters saw it coming?

What Bernanke thinks probably mattered a lot more back in 2001, when Fed still had the chance to nip this Ponzi scheme in its bud. But fast forward to 2010 - he now has no alternative but to keep the scheme going at all cost. Any time they hesitated (as in Lehman Brothers episode) they got a nice foretaste of what is come. Face it – we have long passed the point where our policy makers still have the option to make any meaningful changes.

As I said a Ponzi scheme is a one way street. We either choose to stop, crash and burn now, which is politically unacceptable, or keep it going until the inevitable bigger crash and burn in the future when the scheme can no longer go on.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-03-01 03:25 PM

Oh gosh, and that is not even considering the trillions in interest rate swaps that go boom when interest rates rise.

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-03-01 04:14 PM

It amazes me the number of people who feel the gov/fed has absolute control over interest rates.  They don’t.

Astute Observation by IR Fan
2010-03-01 09:09 PM

I really like the monthly cost analysis. In the short term, I’d probably exclude the equity hidden in payment (if I assume that housing values stay relatively flat and someone has to pay over $50K in transaction costs to sell the house in 6 years, they’ll barely break even). So would the rental parity of this property be $3,036 + $729 = $3,765?

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-03-01 09:16 PM

Rental Parity can be whatever you want, but you may never by a house.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main