Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- zovall on A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
Recent Posts
- A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
- $499,900 :: 84 Deermont 51, Irvine CA, 92602
IR:
I hope that you can do some more digging and make it worthwhile to do milestone updates at 1000 days and 1095 days (3-year mark.)
I’m not surprised about house prices falling and credit standards tightening, but extended squatting sure caught me off guard.
The 3 years mentioned are a national estimate. Looking at OC and Irvine, can’t this be longer ? Or, considering the fact prices haven’t gone down too much, can it actually be shorter, as price would catch up (downward) ?
Also your comment about different market is right on, I’m amazed at the difference in low-end vs high-end. Or OC vs IE. I also had a friend about to buy a house in Sacramento. amazing, prices are in the ~<200$sqf for ~3000sqf houses. And it dropped ~30% within 18months.
I wonder if Irvine is going to see a big drop in the mid range within the next 6months.
The Atlanta woman was referring to the ‘move-up’ market that I’ve seen people mention here, and heard of doing in SoFla. Put 40k down on a 200k home in 2002. ‘Value’ goes to $300k in 2004, sell, take the $140k, and you could put a dp on a $700k home. 700k in 2004 becomes maybe $1M in 2006. Now you have $440k ‘equity in that home. This type of ‘move-up’ helps with down payments, but not with capacity to make payments, as the mortgages went from $160k to $560k.
This is one reason focusing on down payments and not DTI is problematic. If you think as long as there’s a good DP, then the loan will be OK, then you’re biased towards people who already owned pre-bubble.
The ‘move-up’ market is a myth that should be shattered. You should ‘move-up’ when either your income has ‘moved-up’, or you want to transfer more savings into your home (using income-produced savings to buy a more expensive home is fundamentally different than using appreciation fueled equity, and distorts markets much less).
How the “property ladder” used to work was that a young couple would buy a house to fix up, sell it and move up. Repeat.
Of course, after a few rehabs, many relationships are on the rocks. Living out of cardboard boxes and all.
With California’s 20% annual house appreciation the math gets sketchy though. You needed to skip over starter homes and go straight for the McMansion or “be priced out forever.”
My sister “supervised” her husband and he did the house rehab thing for a decade, since she didn’t have the patience for manual labor.
I was referring to houses above. I don’t understand how the “property ladder” math works for condos outside Manhattan.
Condos lard on enough fees to make profitability less likely. They’re popular with young people and those who don’t have the down payment for a real house, but still want to be called a “homeowner” - afraid of “throwing away rent money.”
Whenever former condo owners talk about their condo sale, they always say they got their money back. I rarely have the heart to ask if their condo fees, property tax, sales commission and interest were covered too.
Read about a couple for whom that seemed to work. Wife had the steady income with health benefits (nurse or something). Husband was the construction type, his “job” would be to repair a fixer upper and they would move frequently. Seemed to work for them.
That is not the ladder that person was talking about, as it is limited in the percentage of people it will work for, and for the frequency that can be done. What those people are doing is flipping houses - doing the contracting themselves. that is a different market than the general homeowner environment. Also, especially the home flipping shows, the profit due to the renovation is often swamped by the general appreciation of the property - you’d get almost as much gain if you did no rehabbing. Again, that is totally different than real rehabbing of properties, but what you’re describing is a limited slice of the total market.
As for condos. I’ve seen plenty in SoFla sell for > 75% off 2005/6 peak bubble pricing. So someone who sold then banked…bought then, not so much.
Yeah, that’s flipping, not the property ladder. I think the property ladder was with IHB’s “rent-saver” type of owner. When the cost of owning is less than renting, it makes sense to buy and save up money for a down payment. Having increasing property values could be slightly positive, as long as the next house’s price doesn’t increase faster than the stepping stone house. I think some people would then rent out the stepping stone house, but only if it’s cash flow positive.
I don’t think this is relevant anymore, at least in California.
Why do people have to move up the property ladder? The number of news stories about those about to retire who went up the ladder to a bigger fancier SFR and then lost their jobs and so can’t pay the mortgage, boo hoo, astounds me. Aren’t you supposed to have paid off your house before retiring? And why do you need a bigger SFR after the kids all grow up and leave the nest? It’s crazy.
The lost interest on this house is close to $75k. How long would it have taken the occupant to save $75k after taxes? Lenders need to do a better job. A rental will kick you out after only a couple months of missed payments because they can, but a bank can’t forcibly evict until post-foreclosure? The ability for a bank to hold a loan at one value pre-foreclosure and a much lower value post-foreclosure is a travesty and any bank getting FDIC benefits should not be allowed to do that.
I love some of the quotes like “Right now, buyers know it hasn’t hit bottom, so they’re sitting on the sidelines.”
They make it sound like the majority of America is slick investors like Wall St. Yup, we have hundreds of thousands of dollars just waiting to invest in property, but the time isn’t good enough.
How about the fact WE THE PEOPLE in America will not continue to be debt slaves to the financial world that never gets their hand dirty, and only make money off usury. 6X-10X incomes to purchase the holy grail? I think not, because people ultimately know that life is worth living, and you aren’t doing much living when all your income goes to the BANKSTERS.
Everyday I get closer to defaulting myself, as I cannot stand seeing my monthly payment be significantly more than rent, while prices dive, and there will be no recovery in time to even re-coup my already lost capital before I retire. The scam has been played, and the responsible, conservative, WORKING are victims. Most like me hold on, but how long can the hamster run?
Swiller,
Realize that we are all one day closer to the grave than we were yesterday. Live for the eternal. Be gentle as a dove but wise as serpent.
Most of the run up in the market are herd effects and justified by ad hoc arguements to start the stampede by the earlier purchasers-investment houses. the quick wins, the rest loses. Know the difference between s* and shinenola. Beware of those serving s* while calling it chocolate.
So let me make sure I understand…
You’re upset that you bought a property and the value went down, and now the bank won’t share in you’re financial discomfort.
If the price would have risen would you have offered to share some of the profits with the bank?
Basically you want it both ways. Profits exclusively to you, risks to someone else. The American Way.
Yes. Loans are made on a non-recourse basis in California. Upon foreclosure, the banks only have recourse to the house, not the borrower. That means profits to the homeowner, and risks to someone else.
Before you start blaming homeowners for this, remember: banks were issuing the 0% down, neg amort., no W-2 needed loans in droves.
If you want to blame anyone, blame the banks.
“If you want to blame anyone, blame the banks. “
Nice to see personal responsibility is alive and well.
Personal responsibility? Loan documents allow default. It’s not against the law. It’s not a sin. The consequence is you lose your home and your credit is ruined. Everyone involved knows this. If you’re willing to suffer the consequences, the bank agreed it would foreclose only on the home.
Billion-dollar-sized-banks agreed to this arrangement. Why blame the little homeowner if they act rationally in their best interests?
Yikes…all after home refinances for HELOC money etc. are full recourse loans in CA.
Lots of people are going to be suprised that the bank will hound them to hell or at best ‘forgive’ the debt and make them pay income on a 1099 basis.
Lots of pain to come on that basis.
BD
[url=“http://www.lvrj.com/business/nevada-s-unemployment-rises-climbs-to-14-4-percent-103275189.html”]Nevada unemployment rises to 14.4 percent
[/url]
If you’re seeing positive cashflow from a house that is rented out, declining values won’t bother you much, but with unemployment this high what happens to your supply of quality renters? How long can your cashflow scenario remain positive?
IR, I know your bullish on LV RE, but what’s your take on this? To me, it still seems like there’s a lot of downside left in LV.
I was thinking about buying investment property in Las Vegas as well. A ton of homes have already been sold to investors. But what bothers me is there’s still a HUGE shadow inventory in LV.
Eventually, that inventory will get sold, possibly to more investors. If there’s too many rental properties chasing quality renters, then won’t rental prices drop?
Why won’t the shadow inventory cause rental prices to drop?
This is ridiculous.
The realtor must be from out of the area.
Everyone knows it needs to be priced at $288,888 to generate those multiple all cash FCB offers.
My ex purchased a 3 bedroom condo in the same development in 2006 for $740,000. For a few years she made neg am payments on a option ARM. She did this on an income well below 6 figures. She was in complete denial about the market and her ability to afford this property. In late 2009 I convinced her, with the help of a RE lawer and my tax accountant, that strategic default would be the best option. Her father fought with me about the direction of the market at that time, quoting such luminaries as Eli Broad who stated the market was near a bottom at that time. Overall I lost a tremendous amount of money trying to help her get out of that bad situation. We separated late 2009, so I have no idea if she has had any success negotiating with the bank (B of A formerly Countrywide). She still lives at the address. Chances are she’s still squatting and pocketing the payments.
How can anyone who makes less than $250K a year think she can even halfway afford anything near $740K?
Nobody who made it past 4th grade is that inept at basic arithmetic. This woman was taking part in the mass delusion promoted by our policy makers and the finance & real estate interests they serve at our expense…. a delusional state borne of 60 years of the greatest affluence the world has ever known, which cannot possibly last forever.
One pundit out here remarked that Americans are “very childish people who think that if they wish upon a star, their dreams will come true”. We’ve promoted the American Dream (how I absolutely HATE that term!)for 60 years, and the idea that we are somehow a very special country for whom the ordinary terms of existence do not apply, and that we can safely ignore the laws of nature.
Tens of millions of Americans are now discovering that wishing and “creative visualization” won’t make it possible to defy gravity or make gold out of garbage. As the wonderful science fiction writer Phillip Dick one wrote, reality is what doesn’t go away when you stop believing in it. When people stopped believing in ever-increasing house values, they went away. But the bad debts won’t. Someone will have to absorb them and that would be the rest of us, whose realities are sacrificed to pay for the dreams and delusions of 5% of the population.
LL,
Don’t you know that American think they are the world’s best in math. Your math is just not good enough to figure out what all the business models have put forth of increasing salaries and better pension.
I’ve had co-worker who were part-time RE and mortage brokers, fume at me when saying no to buy because I did the math and could not affort the property. Just a herd effect in price, some will be left holding the bag (the latter buyers and the latter sellers).
I guess some animals are created more equal than others.
That’s interesting about Case’s house. I saw a picture of Shiller’s house (can’t find the link). It was an older modest SFR he bought a long time ago. Definitely looked like just a place to live in, not an investment.
I have seen house prices drop up to 70% here in Palmdale and yet the builders are continuing to build despite having thousands of empty houses.
It would seem that the builders have no interest in seeing property values rise.
IR “...The foolish series of mistakes made by people in our government and their lending overlords has squandered our resources and accomplished nothing—expect perhaps to shift these losses to US taxpayers.”
That why they continue to do the different programs and continue to “fail” by your (IR) standards. The programs are extremely sucessful if you understand the true intent of the new loan assistance programs. They show for the elections that the govt cares for the needed (make squatters) and are trying every measure to fix the bubble problem. Mostly smoke and mirrors to transfer liabilities, while collecting new bank fees.
I fully understand holding on a property to sell at a later date if the expenses outweights other investments and you get something out of the property. On a free and clear vacation property:
Oportunity cost: 0.5- 1.5% with the current low interest rates.
RE Taxes: 1% (if Prop 13 then even lower)
Maintance: 1%
Utilities and insurance: $1500
Income: Short-term rents and virtual income personal usage (saved vacation money).
Why would the opportunity costs be so low?
30 year Treasuries are at about 3.8%
I’m using short-term rates. Who knows what will happen in 2 years, yet alone in 30 years?
Just use 4% and test if the vacation property is economically worth keeping for a few years. If not, do the emotional aspects tip the balance? Such as the house was my grandfather’s, father’s, now mine. I want to pass it to my children. That can be worth more than the money portion.
BTW - the house from the Godfather movie you had a picture from the other day is now on the market
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/09/former-hearst-davies-mansion-for-sale-for-95-million.html
Have any of you seen this?
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/09/latest-real-estate-time-bomb-title-of-foreclosed-properties-clouded-wells-fargo-dumping-risk-on-hapless-buyers.html
Irvine Renter ... this one bedroom you feature sure looks like “home sweet home” to me ... being a single person who keeps to my self, it would be ideal ... and in Turtle Ridge ... like WOW ... unfortunately all I could afford would be the association fees and utilities.
I’ve provided a link to the Keith Jurrow, RealEstateChannel article Shadow Inventory, an Avalanche That’s Coming Soon? He relates:
Adding all of these together, we come up with a total of roughly 6.97 million residences which are almost certainly going to be thrown onto the resale market as distressed properties at some point in the not-too-distant future. This massive number of homes will put enormous downward pressure on sale prices. To believe that prices are firming now is to completely ignore this shadow inventory. Ignore it at your own risk.
Will three years be enough to bring prices back up as the title of your article suggests?
Well if there are now 6.7 million homes in shadow inventory to hit the market, and more next year, then home prices are never going to come back up.
It will be like in Detroit where as Sarah Cwiek reports on September 17, 2010 in Detroit Michigan Radio article Tax Foreclosures Surge In Wayne County:
“Wayne County County puts a record 13,000 tax-foreclosed properties on the auction block starting today (Friday). Ted Phillips is Executive Director of the United Community Housing Coalition in Detroit. He says the number of occupied properties facing tax foreclosure jumped tenfold this year.
Phillips says the economy is driving the problem, but tacking water bills and high interest rates onto back taxes contributed to the sudden surge.
He adds the huge amount of property available raises fears that speculators could buy much of it on the cheap, further degrading already hard-hit neighborhoods.
“In past years there’s been a half a dozen out of town investors that have purchased the property,” Phillips says. “We’ve been at this now long enough to see properties that were purchased at the auction that are now coming back onto the auction because the investors don’t pay the taxes, don’t keep the property up.”
The Wayne County Treasurer’s office says the sheer number of properties is forcing them to conduct the auction online.”
Finally here is something to ponder, I am writing at 4:00 AM Pacific Time on September 21; and at 2:15 PM Eastern Time the FOMC will announce the minutes of its meeting.
A bear market in stocks started September 17, 2010 as currency traders sold the Euro, FXE, in response to the Bank of Japan intervening in the currency markets on September 15, 2010 and selling Yen, FXY, to stop the rise of its currency; this caused the Yen to fall to its 20 day moving average, which in turn terminated “long carry trade investing”. The Euro, FXE, fell 0.32% to close at 129.88.
Yesterday, September 20, 2010, September 20, 2010, the currency traders went long the the Australian Dollar, FXA, and the Swedish Krona, FXS, in front on the US Federal Reserve Meeting, causing stocks to rise.
Whether there be disappointment or satisfaction with the Fed Meeting, I believe the Euro will fall from the region of 129.88 and that this will cause continuing disinvestment from stocks as well as all currencies, including the US Dollar over time, to fall lower in value.
Yes debt deflation has come to stocks and bonds. And with falling currencies, real estate as well.
Irvine Renter please understand the only bottom is zero, like in Detroit.
Just ask anyone in Hungary, as their currency the Forint has fallen, and no one, repeat nobody repays the Austrian and Switzerland banks back on their Euro and Franc home loans.
I said it before, and I’ll repeat it again .... While many write that Ms Warren has been appointed as a lapdog, I believe that Ms. Warren, is more likely to turn out to be the top dog, that is the Seignior, meaning top dog who takes a cut, and be called upon in time of crisis, to assume the role of Financial Regulator overseeing investment, banking, lending, credit, seigniorage and house leasing as her many articles would apparently qualify her for such a role.
Hi,
I was wondering where you got the income requirements for the FHA loan numbers—-is this income listed your gross income or after taxes? It seems downright dangerous to take out a loan because it takes up an overwhelming amount of one’s income.
Taking the listed income of $58,768 this amounts to $4897 per month, but that’s GROSS. If you have taxes taken out, and being very generous here, maybe you get $4000 each month—this means that your monthly out of pocket expenses are over 50% of your monthly check. Even if no taxes are taken out, it’s still 44% of pay!!
I don’t know, but unless you want to eat top ramen and bike to work, this is not a plan that can realistically work.