New home sales down 80% from peak, down 18.6% last year, down 11.1% last month

Feb 28th, 2011  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by winstongator
2011-02-28 05:10 AM

“How fast prices go down depends on the rate at which product is released to the market.”

How much product is available to go onto the market makes almost as much of a difference.  Areas where there have not been a lot of foreclosures, and delinquencies are < 5%, the speed of REOs hitting the market is not as important as people who can afford to sell at lower prices taking those lower prices.  The real bargains in our price point have been homes of relocating mid-management people, where either a relo specialist or their company eat the loss (biggest price drop I’ve seen was 20%).

A ‘healthy’ market with REOs moving quickly will not see prices drop as much as an unhealthy market with a slow trickle REO.  It is supply & demand though, and areas with weak demand already & excess supply, will not do well with extra REO supply hitting the market.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2011-02-28 05:56 AM

Those margins are lower than I expected you would see in Vegas.  I expected around 5% average per flip.  Those are probably some of your worse so maybe overall you are still at 5%.  At 2% if you can turnover 4 times per year you’ll achieve 8% yearly which still isn’t bad.  I believe those margins include you paying someone to deal with the white trash tenants or debtors, their dirty underwear left, garbage left, dogs left, extortion fee to walk away peacefully, etc…  8% per year would be bad if you had to experience all of that first hand.

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2011-02-28 10:55 AM

Agree, I was thinking the number ranged anywhere from 10%-15% per flip.
Isn’t that what they’re getting on flips in Irvine?
Given the risk and headache 5% seems rather low.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-02-28 01:01 PM

Usually you want to net 8% to 10%. If the net were only a 5% margin, the risk would not warrant the reward.

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2011-02-28 01:23 PM

You’ll need to net north of 10% to stay ahead of inflation.

Astute Observation by SantaAnaRenter
2011-02-28 08:09 AM

Principle Reduction?

If so, please I hope someone digs-in to prove it and splashes this story on the front page of some MSM.

If true… Some guy whines and pleads, claims some “hardship”, threatens (got a lawer?), and gets a principle reduction of over $250,000 - only to turn around, sell and put it in his pocket?

That is ridiculous.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2011-02-28 08:24 AM

But think of the children, they will be able to go to the finest private colleges with no debt and get the best jobs on wall street or boutique consulting firms.

Astute Observation by winstongator
2011-02-28 10:02 AM

If the property is worth anything close to the asking price, they had no business getting a mod, the bank would just push to a regular sale, or speed through a foreclosure.  If there’s equity left, foreclosures can be a boom for fees & other costs.

Now, it’s BoA, and SoCal, might this be a friends of Angelo program not available to everyone?

Astute Observation by Sue in Irvine
2011-02-28 09:18 AM

Ok, that’s an amazing pool. But, not much of a kitchen for the price. And how did they come up with $1,133,800?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-02-28 09:28 AM

My guess is they calculated their closing costs and commissions and set the price to get out at breakeven for what they paid.

I love that pool.

Astute Observation by Sac Boomer
2011-02-28 12:48 PM

IR & Sue

I don’t know about that pool. My first impression was that it looked like the Calico Mine Train Ride at Knott’s!

SB

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2011-02-28 03:47 PM

Forget the pool.  Did you see those amazing Elegant Palms?

Simply marvelous, darling.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2011-02-28 03:49 PM

And custom base boards? WOAH!

Truly a resort style house!

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-02-28 03:57 PM

I missed that one. Next time.

Astute Observation by Walter
2011-02-28 09:59 AM

Correction:

Private (but not quiet) end of cul-de-sac location backing to Irvine Center Dr.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2011-02-28 10:23 AM

It is possible the home owner refied to get a lower interest rate, and that was only available up to the jumbo limit, so he really did come to the table with a quarter million bucks.  Maybe he then immediately regretted it, so he turned around and put it on the market.  Or maybe this is one of those “If somebody is crazy enough to pay my high price, I’ll sell it, but if not, meh” things-the asking price appears to be significantly above sold comps (or even other active listings), especially if you factor in that it backs to a busy street.

Astute Observation by Perspective
2011-02-28 12:25 PM

That is possible.  We’ve been considering that for months now.  It’s a tough question.  If you have enough cash to make-up for the underwater portion, do you choose to refi to lower rates (150+ bps in our situation)?

We haven’t yet, but re-evaluaute every month…

Astute Observation by winstongator
2011-02-28 10:25 AM

Both those homes in LV seemed to be at the very outer edge of development.  Has there been a big discrepancy in how neighborhoods have held up that far out relative to more central areas?

New construction will be the canary in the coal mine for when housing will really turn.  In a lot of areas, I don’t see construction getting back to peak levels for a very long time.  Too much supply overhang and economies too tied to housing.  Construction will pick up when supply/demand pushes the prices of existing homes up.  So it might not lead by much, but a real housing recovery requires a healthy level of new construction.

Astute Observation by getTheFactsStraight
2011-02-28 10:35 AM

I am a regular reader of this blog, but never thought the author will write something without doing proper homework…

Please get your facts straight.

You will wait quite a long time for your so called loan mod information to appear on this property.

BTW, what’s wrong with putting down $250K to get a better interest rate and what’s wrong with moving up when you possibly can?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-02-28 01:08 PM

What specifically did I write that was not factual? I have written about what is in the property records. Nothing more.

There is nothing wrong with paying the mortgage down $250,000 to lock in lower financing. If this owner did that, why are they selling 30 days later? Why not just sell and pay off the loan? If they really did pay the mortgage down $250K only to sell it a month later, what have they gained? They are spending a few thousand in loan fees to achieve the same net. Perhaps this isn’t a loan modification or a principal reduction. Perhaps the owners just like giving money to mortgage brokers.

Astute Observation by getTheFactsStraight
2011-02-28 01:44 PM

All your facts may be correct, but assumptions are NOT correct…

- the title “Take the loan mod money and run” is incorrect (this is your assumption)

- refi can be $0 cost

- If property sells, move up, else enjoy the savings on interest with reduction of rate by ~175bp.

(source: I know the owners)

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-02-28 03:55 PM

I will take your word for it. Please see the updated post.

Astute Observation by IndieDev
2011-02-28 10:37 AM

I pulled most of my money out of Bank of America (MF, HIC, etc). I keep the balance to around $5,000 to use for paying bills every once in a while. BofA must have a lot of former WAMU and Countrywide executives on its board.

Astute Observation by chris
2011-02-28 02:34 PM

So where did you transfer your cash ? = which bank do you consider more secure than BoA !?

Astute Observation by IndieDev
2011-03-01 10:28 AM

BofA has the worst risk rating of all the big banks based on mortgage liabilities. Chase is a close second. Wells is third.

I’d keep your money out any of those banks.

That being said, I’m not certified to give financial advice, take to your CPA. But a no-load mutual fund would be a simple example of a better place to keep your cash right now until all of this silliness washes away.

Astute Observation by Kelja
2011-02-28 02:49 PM

Now that the servicers have commenced write-downs on the principal for underwater homeowners, won’t it encourage others close to the edge to stop paying their mortgages?

Are the floodgates opening up?

Astute Observation by Perspective
2011-02-28 03:52 PM

They (government agencies and depts) have been pretty clear about the need to not tie principal write-downs to defaults because they understand this encourages default.  HAMP and other commentary has been around writing-down principal and interest sufficient to get that over-debted borrower, but not too-over-debted borrower, down to a reasonable front-end DTI (33%?).

FHA’s short refi program only cares about the underwater position.  Regardless of whether you’re “troubled” or not, if you’re underwater, it requires the first to write-down 10% and has incentives to extinguish any seconds.  This is a voluntary program right now, but I’ve read that two major banks/servicers have signed-on to complete FHA short refis.  So there may be more pressure now for others to join.

Astute Observation by South County
2011-02-28 03:05 PM

With the Irvine Company you need to look at the sole owner, Don Bren. The fact that now his development AND home construction are self funded we have a sense/depth of his wealth. He has restarted his merchant homebuiling division and soon opening a homebuyer design center for his buyers (high margin options). With a land cost base going back to 1983 on the ranch and a solid drop of % in his hard construction/land development costs I think his margins are north of 50% per “for sale unit” with land factored in. I know this is a huge number. By far Don Bren has the best thing going in residental development in the United States.

Bren has no need for public homebuilders to takedown his lots, he is just making to much money on his own.

By the way it was great when Dan Young was on your IHB pod cast, thanks IR

Astute Observation by NOT
2011-02-28 03:20 PM

Read a Dilbert, thought of here:

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2011-02-28 04:02 PM

I am still waiting for Professional Landscaping.  I have missed that one.

Astute Observation by LarryB
2011-02-28 04:55 PM

You all have to drive by this place to truly get an idea of how ludicrous the market is in Irvine.  Three quarters of a million bucks?  I guess someone will pay it (because of the schools). http://www.redfin.com/CA/Irvine/86-Windjammer-92614/home/4692722

Astute Observation by rkp
2011-02-28 05:56 PM

love that the 2000 price was substantially less than the 1989 price…man i wish i was older in 2000…would have bought up houses left and right

May 04, 2000   Sold (Public Records)    $176,000   -2.1%/yr   Public Records  
Jun 29, 1989   Sold (Public Records)    $222,500   —  Public Records

Astute Observation by EconE
2011-02-28 07:37 PM

From the listing…

“Beautifully upgraded end unit cottage home that underwent a complete addition and remodel in 2007. Owners cost of improvements exceeding over $300,000

Sounds like a 2007 cash out refi with an ARM that’s gonna reset in 2012.

Future foreclosure I’ll bet.

Astute Observation by JK
2011-02-28 08:21 PM

Do you really believe they spent $300,000? Okay, a lot on that pool..but realtards tend to overestimate the cost of improvements. (you think?)
As if it will justify the high prices some delusional sellers list at.

Astute Observation by EconE
2011-03-01 05:59 AM

We’re not talking about the home that IrvineRenter profiled.  We’re talking about the one on Windjammer that LarryB pointed out.

They expanded the home substantially in 2007.

Astute Observation by JK
2011-02-28 08:16 PM

I commend you for sharing the info about your own flip. While PR stated if you do four of those you would get a 8% return I’m not sure that’s good. If you are on average getting a lot higher than that’s another thing. I look at that flip and say to myself..$3,000 dollars for four months work..that’s only $750/month. To tie up that much money for that low a return is a dangerous game. All it would take is a sudden downturn even more in that market and you would start losing money.
Have you lost money on a flip yet? If so/not what happens if you do in the future? Could you weather a sudden downturn?
Is this a personal flip or part of the fund that you started?

My own strategy has been to buy/hold/and rent. Still, I wish you luck.

Astute Observation by BD
2011-02-28 09:28 PM

Hey IR -

I have a question for you and the group.  I wonder to myself about this very question because it impacts me directly.  So here is the question: 

What do most people plan to do when the retire with their SoCal RE?  I personally would like to believe that I will have enough savings and retirement income that I can keep my dream home in CA in retirement. 

That said, it’s hard for me to believe that most Irvinites or other SoCal owners can buy their dream home for say $1M without significant downpayments.  So let’s say I put 250K down on the 1M dream and finance the remaining 750K over 30 years. 

This downpayment will take a large ‘chunk’ out of my retirement savings.  Furthermore if I’m 50 it means I will have to work untill I’m 80 to pay the thing off - at 40 until 70yrs to pay the thing off.  Let’s say I do this and work until I’m 70 or 80 to pay the thing off… In all likelihood I will not have enough money now in retirement and SS to pay my basic bills for property tax, HOA, Cable, electric / energy etc.  Much less travel or buy a car. 

I just wonder how any of this is possible for most??  I think most plan to buy here Irvine SoCal now with THE HOPE that the place doesn’t loose too much value or better yet appreciates so that they can move to a much lower cost area or a much smaller place. 

I’m single and earn well i.e., have no college to plan for or other currently.  I can’t imagine working until I’m 70-80 to just retire and be forced to sell the place to move to LV or Kansas.  But, this is the only option that makes practical sense. 

Again the question:  Does anyone here plan to retire here in their DREAM HOME?? 

Thanks,

BD

Astute Observation by awgee
2011-02-28 11:17 PM

Yes, we are planning that the next home we buy will be our last.

Astute Observation by winstongator
2011-03-01 04:58 AM

The home you need in retirement could very easily be different than the one you need.  Our current house, close to our ‘dream’ house, has a lot of space that would go for our kids.  When they are grown/out of the house, we’ll likely downsize/price.

There is also the option of a 15 year mortgage, or putting more money down.  I don’t get 30 yr mortgages to 50 year olds.  Shoot, they were giving 30 year mortgages to 60, 65, 70 year olds.  I’m not for age discrimination, but if you’re qualifying someone based on job income, will that be there at age 85?

You might be better figuring on a lower down payment, but 15 year mortgage.  You will afford less, but it will be paid off sooner, without hitting your retirement as much.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main