How Gaming Interests Could Save the Las Vegas Housing Market, and Why They Should

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2010-05-19 05:42 AM

Las Vegas: Building Is Booming in a City of Empty Houses

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/business/16builder.html?src=busln

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-19 06:32 AM

This is a classic example of the mis-allocation of resources being caused by the restricted inventory policies of lenders:

“Home prices in Las Vegas are down by 60 percent from 2006 in one of the steepest descents in modern times. There are 9,517 spanking new houses sitting empty. An additional 5,600 homes were repossessed by lenders in the first three months of this year and could soon be for sale.

Yet builders here are putting up 1,100 homes, and they are frantically buying lots for even more.

Las Vegas is trying to recover by building what it does not need. It is an unlikely pattern being repeated in many of the areas where the housing crash was most severe.”

This is shadow inventory and one of the problems it creates.

Astute Observation by es
2010-05-19 09:35 AM

there are two flaws in your argument, IR, although I generally agree with your ends. 

1)  Las Vegas locals, as far as I know, do not frequent the casinos.  They will not spend the other $1500 in a casino.  However, I believe that money will recirculate through the local economy and give the casinos some sort of boost indirectly.  Casinos are supported almost entirely by the tourism business.

2)  People may be weary of their employer also owning their home.  That just “doesn’t smell right,” for lack of a better term.  Although, your assertion that employees will be thrilled to be out from under the mountain of of debt is almost certainly accurate.  Who is to say “Superfund” won’t also start taking advantage of its renters?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-19 10:23 AM

The Las Vegas locals gamble and spend heavily in the casinos. The entire Station casino chain caters almost exclusively to locals as does the Coast casinos. It is big business.

Company towns are as old as industry itself, and there is a danger of them controlling rents and keeping them artificially high. That hasn’t bothered the Irvine Company, so I doubt it would bother the casinos very much.

Astute Observation by Paul
2010-05-19 02:46 PM

My grandmother used to live in Vegas, and she gambled in the casinos.  Of course, by her accounts she almost always won.  wink

Astute Observation by Brad
2010-05-19 06:12 AM

Such a 180.  I lived in Las Vegas for a year and a half, 2004-5.  My coworkers were deep in the housing bubble fiasco.  Real estate was a huge topic in the office.  Had coworkers moving to new bigger houses and selling or renting their old ones.  They all had the latest toys and cars.  I think I was the only renter in the office of 25.  I felt so poor hehe.  I was renting a 1000 ft^2 studio loft with all appliances for $650 a month.  If I stayed another year I prolly would have been sucked into it.

Now that I think back it was kind of funny.  Noone ever mentioned hanging out at the casinos after work.  I only went into casinos with coworkers to just go to the theaters in there.  They were all anti-gambling as a pastime.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-19 08:02 AM

This is a brilliant idea if your goal is to end up on the cover of the Wall Street Journal in handcuffs all for the promise of a 6% roi.  Advice for Casino owners: the last thing you need is to bite the hand that feeds you. 

I would avoid investing in Las Vegas just as I would avoid Riverside.  They are both in full fledged death spirals.  When house prices are down 50% and unemployment is at 20% there is no where to go but down.  Put your money in safe havens.  If you want to live in Riverside or Las Vegas that’s a different story.  Investing in residential RE in either place is a fools game.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-19 09:26 AM

I appreciate that you come here and provide an opposing point of view. I completely disagree with every statement you made above, and for a variety of reasons, I believe you are completely and totally wrong.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-19 09:47 AM

The fact that nobody would do this shows that I am right.  Who in their right mind seeks out a 6% roi with immense risk?  The liabilities in this plan are outrageous they include but are not limited to: declining rents, increasing vacancies, fraud lawsuits, debilitated lending relationships, etc. 

Thankfully there is one thing keeping you from losing millions of dollars.  You don’t have access to hundreds of millions of dollars.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-19 10:32 AM

I would like to leave you with the last word, but you keep spouting complete nonsense, so I feel I must respond.

First, the capitalization rate investors find in Las Vegas are nearly double what they get in coastal California. Basically, only kool aid intoxication and the inability to compute a rate of return would make someone favor investing here over investing in Las Vegas.

Second, the list of liabilities you made up is utterly ridiculous. The only one that has any merit is the possibility of declining rents, but I don’t see that as likely in Las Vegas—Detroit maybe, but not Las Vegas.

Third, as far as whether or not someone will back this idea with millions of dollars is not your business. I am certainly not asking for your money, nor would I want money from someone who does not believe in the opportunity. Money put into Las Vegas real estate right now has far less downside potential the money put into coastal California.

The people like you who fail to see the obvious investment potential of the great positive cashflow these properties provide is exactly why people like you miss the best deals when they are presented.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-19 10:47 AM

I assume you have the ability to buy a cash flow investment in Riverside or Las Vegas.  Perhaps I assume too much, the hurdle rate is so low.  Why not put your money where your mouth is and make a small investment.  Report on the investment and tell us how it goes in 3, 5, 10 years.

You fail to recognize the extreme momentum 50% price declines and 20% unemployment have on any cash flow opportunity.  The best way to learn is to front some money, pay some tuition to learn your lesson.

You don’t see the fraud liability on both the lending and tenant side?  You don’t see the relationship liability for a casino owner on the lending side?

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-05-19 07:57 PM

IrvineRenter,
Earlier this year you gave the best investment observation to me.  The Joe Six pack is usually investing after the upward movement has been exhausted.  LV still has lots to fall with the high vacancy rate, high unemployment and economy that based on discretionary spending (gambling and entertainment that requires a special trip and time).  Location, Location, Location applies to to impulsively acting out on this temptation. 

LV and coastal RE might both be bad investments at this time.

Astute Observation by brea
2010-05-19 09:16 PM

PR,

Could you please specify whether you mean Riverside or Riverside County when you make your predictions.  I doubt that Riverside will drop 40% but maybe some area in Riverside County does.  It is a big place.

For the record, a lot of western Riverside County commutes into Orange and LA county to work.  When one of those guys loses his Irvine job, the statistic show up in Riverside county as higher unemployment.  Also, it will not necessary to add jobs in Riverside county to reduce our unemployment rate.  Our prospects are not as hopeless as you predict.

Astute Observation by alan
2010-05-19 09:01 AM

Used to golf at RSJ every Sunday for years..it’s a so-so course, built on a landfill so sometimes there was an odor, but you could at least get on without a tee time.  Mile square was impossible on a Sunday without an advance time.

Always thought those condos on the course looked like dumps, the kind made for the “lower” working classes.  I certainly did not want to live there.

No offense to the bulls but I would never pay north of $300K for anything there.  But if you want to pay $500k to own a dumpy apartment built on a municipal golf course that was built on a landfill… more power to you.

Astute Observation by Walter
2010-05-19 09:05 AM

“If values never come back, you are certainly no worse off by renting”

Are they obligated to stay on as renters? What if rents go down but Superfund is increasing the rent 2% a year?

Then they should walk from Superfund because prices most likely were flat to down.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-19 09:23 AM

Renters who move out can always be replaced. Landlords do this every day. Most former owners who are renters will not move out because they will still feel like it is their home. As it stands, these people are willing to pay double market rents in a mortgage payment to stay in their homes. If they pay only 5% to 10% above market rents, they are getting a relative bargain.

Astute Observation by Lucky Victim
2010-05-19 09:29 AM

Superfund is a great idea.  Sadly as stated it requires a ton of money for minimum return financially (but maximum in karma!)

Astute Observation by avobserver
2010-05-19 09:56 AM

Exactly. LV may only have achieved a temporary rental parity,  not a permanent one. There is no guarantee rent will stay constant or go up in today’s environment. Unless you think that gaming industry is anti-cyclical, i.e., economic depression will drive more people to gambling.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-19 10:41 AM

Las Vegas is much, much less expensive than rental parity. That is why it is such a good investment. If you were a resident, you can now own property for about 30% less than the cost of a rental. Even the really nice stuff trades at or below rental parity.

The gaming industry does not need to be anti-cyclical. This recession will finally end, and people will go back to Las Vegas and gamble. When they do, employment will pick up, rents will increase, and property values will recover to their historic trendlines.

Astute Observation by avobserver
2010-05-19 11:43 AM

Agreed. if LV market already overshot 30% then the buffer zone should be large enough for the next 5 years.

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-05-19 01:10 PM

Even if a massive decrease in american standards of living ensues (the question is not if but when) the asians will come here and gamble with their newly increased purchasing power.  I hate vegas and wont invest there but I see that happening.

If I’m wrong, all the overbuilding of homes and casinos of the past decade will be firesold and investors will scramble for business as supply of homes and casinos will drench demand.

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-05-20 05:39 AM

Nobody is going to walk away from this global mess with increased purchasing power. If anything deflation is starting to kick in making our dollar more valuable, despite the printing presses running in hyperdrive. Cash is king. Debt and holding bubbly assets are bad.

Astute Observation by Stock Investor
2010-05-19 09:28 AM

IrvineRenter: “you will need to wait two years before getting a new government insured loan to purchase a house”

Two years is a long time. Nobody can guarantee that lending standards will stay the same. Credit scoring models are changing dynamically to mitigate losses. It is purely mathematical. The more foreclosures, the more effect they have.

By the way, it may sound absurd, but some non-FICO scoring models already punish people for living in hardest hit zip codes. It would be nice to see more redlining.

IrvineRenter: “You will be paying an above-market rent to stay in your home. Plus, you will agree to a 2% automatic yearly rental increase.”

Why to pay much more then other renters?

Moving is not expensive for do-it-yourself guy. Just $250 can buy the best monthly rent (U-Haul truck, 2 helpers, free boxes, pack and unpack yourself).

Astute Observation by darms
2010-05-19 09:56 AM

Moving is a non-trivial task, especially when you’ve lived in a house for a long time. I’ve been in my house for 18 years and shudder to think of what would be required to move out of here. Over 18 years one can accumulate a great deal of stuff…

Astute Observation by theyenguy
2010-05-19 09:48 AM

You relate: “The gaming interests in Las Vegas can save their local housing market” ... “My friends and I with Superfund are coming to town, and we want to save your home and clean up the mess that lenders made of your life.”

How altruistic!

I read recently where MGM may go bust soon; Ritz Carlton Lake Las Vegas Hotel Casino And Resort in Henderson, owned by DB, went bust, so the liquidity even in the gaming interests themselves is not there ... like Las Vegas these organizations are all illusion and sleight of hand.

I once worked for a mining company that owned a property in Platoro Colorado that had yen carry trade loans from a big bank in Japan. And it bought and fixed up cabins for its workers in the town of Platoro, near Antonito: it was a type of wild-cat investment you propose in your blog today. The properties were dilapidated, but with investment, improved quite nicely; the company’s investment restored the community. Unfortunately, the mining company never found the mother load of silver and gold, and left Colorado. I do not know what became of the nicely restored mountain cabins; but I do know the company lost tens of millions of dollars on its project: it was a gamble, that unfortunately, did not pay off.

Sheryl Crow sings she’s Leaving Las Vegas—smart woman. A global financial collapse is coming and it is going to be “mean”. I suggest that one leave the city for the country. Yes, the safest and best place to live, is out in the country; like out in Whatcom County in Washington state on a farm.

The mutual fund Vicex, traded as VICEX, which trades in “sin stocks”, has done well over the years. It has outperformed the Russell 2000, IWM and the Dow, DIA, since its inception. From 2003 to 2005, it rose 80% and then went on to a peak gain in 2007 of 160%. You relate that home prices in Las Vegas doubled between 2003 and 2005. So if one took out a second or a HELOC on his property and invested it in VICEX, then one could have had 80% gain on the loan proceeds.

The Las Vegas Case Shiller Price Chart is a valuable investment chart; I had the opportunity to invest in a rental condo in Las Vegas in 1992 and 1993, but thought the market overpriced and declined to invest. Then came financial deregulation with the repeal of Glass Steagall. It was a vote of 92 to 8 in the US Senate for repeal. Being a naive-simpleton, I had no idea of what the true meaning of the term “financial deregulation” meant: it legalized new products such as CDOs and Option ARMs to capitalize the insightful and impoverish the foolish. Financial deregulation is Orwellian Doublespeak at its best. Look how real estate values took off right after Glass Steagall was repealed and as Alan Greenspan, the Czar of Credit Liquidity, lowered interest rates! The Senators and The Fed Chief remind me so much of The Cat In The Hat, come alive, that is the Dr. Seuss Character who wearing a tall, red and white-striped hat and red bow tie, lead the children in a riotous party. So today, the riotous party continues with HAMP, GSE 96.5% LTV home loans, and the FASB 157 entitlement allowing banks to value mortgages to manager’s best estimate rather than to market. But wait, there is more, just this month the European Finance Ministers met in Summit and announced a sovereign debt bailout superfund that has created an EU Treasury and made Jean-Claude Trichet effectively the European Economic Government Seignior responsible for selling state and corprated debt and issuing seigniorage aid for Greece. Thus more Cat-In-The-Hat-Ism.   

The Case Shiller chart shows a bell curve—prices must return to normal—they will return to 1993 level when there is a black swan event, such as a failed Treasury Auction, or war between Israel and Syria, that suddenly evaporates credit liquidity from the Ten Year US Treasury market place.   

The article references Summerlin; it is interesting that it is a master planned community of The Howard Hughes Corporation, an affiliate of General Growth Properties, (hat tip to Wikipedia); prices have a long, long ways to fall.

And they even have a much, much, much further way to fall in Paradise Valley. What a name! I never knew there was such a place until I read the Melinda Fulmer MSN Real Estate article Hard Times In Paradise. I then went Redfin and found the average priced home at 1.7 Million, like the one at 7131 E Berneil Ln, Paradise Valley, AZ 85253.

Why, just why in the world, with a depression coming soon, would someone buy the condo you feature? I sure do not want to be living near UCI and the 405 freeway, now or ever, and be committed to a mortgage.

Well thanks for another good article; please keep warning of the California koolaid. I feel sorry for the people trapped in mortgages.

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2010-05-19 10:56 AM

Vacations and gambling are discretionary expenses. If the boomers find their govt handouts disappear when the debt gets too big, if average working Joe finds the price of oil inflates gas, food, etc way faster than his pay - will they still feel like going to Vegas?

Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-05-19 12:23 PM

Riverside and Las Vegas are frequent topics of discussion here. I don’t fully comprehend the economy of Riverside, but I know that if peak oil is for real, and if it happens anytime soon, that the price of a plane ticket or a gallon of gas will be the one variable which determines whether Vegas lives or dies.

At $8/gallon gasoline, Vegas will be the new Detroit.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-19 12:49 PM

Don’t forget air conditioning cost. 

There is nothing that special about these desert communities with low paying jobs, education deficient, and high unemployment.

It’s not a question of whether Las Vegas will go the way of Detroit.  It will, it is only a question of when.

Astute Observation by avobserver
2010-05-19 12:50 PM

“At $8/gallon gasoline, Vegas will be the new Detroit.”

At $8/gallon over 80% of USA will be the new Detroit.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-19 01:18 PM

It’s all relative, I’m happy in the OC with $8/gal gasoline.  Less traffic, and being close to job centers becomes more valuable.

Good luck in the desert with gas, electricity, and water commodity prices and few industries for employment.

Astute Observation by Chris
2010-05-19 09:14 PM

“...close to job centers…”

Will there be job centers with that condition?

Hmmmmm…....

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-05-19 11:03 AM

The Senators and The Fed Chief remind me so much of The Cat In The Hat, come alive, that is the Dr. Seuss Character who wearing a tall, red and white-striped hat and red bow tie, lead the children in a riotous party.

The Cat In The Hat had a magic cleaning machine to clean up the mess before mom came home. Do the Senators and Bernanke have such a device to clean up the mess?

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2010-05-19 11:49 AM

The Cat in the Hat could magically conjure up 26 cat helpers (little cats a, b, c, etc) to clean up the mess.

Bernake is not limited to just 26 ... The printing press can make a near infinite number of dollars ...

Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-05-19 11:34 AM

“I suggest that one leave the city for the country. Yes, the safest and best place to live, is out in the country; like out in Whatcom County in Washington state on a farm.”

I enjoyed your post, but I think the concept of the pastoral refuge should not be uncritically accepted.

Rural areas are traditionally the bastion of narrow-minded, suspicious, proudly judgmental people who live there because they can’t handle living anywhere else. There are exceptions, but there is also a reason why even some pretty conservative people fled the countryside during the 1930s and never looked back.

These days, even in good times, one of the great economic engines of rural America is meth.

If you hope to defend yourself against angry mobs on your homestead, you should not delude yourself: the historical record shows a score of Angry Mobs over homesteaders, 884,372 to 0.

And a return to subsistence farming is not for amateurs or the faint of heart - there is some question as to whether it’s for professionals. It will be subsistence farming - as in “not-for-profit” - because the gigantic agribusiness interests now own the market in profitable farming.

Astute Observation by Sue in Irvine
2010-05-19 10:01 AM

Does anyone have an opinion on the new Irvine development Central Park West? It’s located at Jamboree and Michelson. The grand opening is Saturday. There are about 6 different residences.

Astute Observation by es
2010-05-19 10:12 AM

Buy all 6.  Real estate prices in Irvine never, ever go down.  They’re not making any more land!

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-05-19 01:12 PM

I also heard in the news within the past week that the housing market is set for a rebound. I’m really confused, especially since there’s an article today about how delinquencies and foreclosures have set a new record.

What’s the deal with all the misleading headlines?

Astute Observation by Marc
2010-05-19 12:34 PM

Too close to the 405, not sure who wants to live there unless prices are really appealing (which I doubt). Also, isn’t this part of the Santa Ana School District?

Astute Observation by Eric from Austin
2010-05-19 10:31 AM

You’re a genius, robert. I love how you spell things out.

I really feel that the only way to get past all this mess in the world is default.

Let homeowners default.
Let sovereign nations default.
Stop rolling over the debt with endless bailouts. Why is it so inconceivable that people/governments are unable to pay their debts? Let it happen- that’s the risk part investing. If there is no risk there is only moral hazard.

Astute Observation by theyenguy
2010-05-19 11:00 AM

Prices begin at $400,000 for the Maxfield, $500,000 for the Granville, and $600,00 for the Chelsea.

Redfin provides a search listing for condominiums in Irvine; and relates they sell for $341/sq which is a 10.9% decrease over the last year. After reading this blog, and knowning that prices are falling, and likely to continue to fall, why, just why, are you interested in a buying a condo?

You can use the link to go to photos of the condos; frankly I don’t think they look that great.

Astute Observation by Sue in Irvine
2010-05-19 12:37 PM

yenguy. I’m not interested in buying at Central Park West. We bought our condo in Woodbridge in 1993. I was just asking because I wonder if they will sell like Woodbury 2 and the new Portola condos are selling.

Astute Observation by Sue in Irvine
2010-05-19 12:55 PM

Oh, and yenguy..according to The Register’s graph today of April’s home prices and sales…my zip in Irvine 92614 has the median sale price up 45.9% from ‘09 and sales up 25% from ‘09.

Astute Observation by LV2LA
2010-05-19 11:43 AM

We were within months of moving out of LV now we might have to stay.
Housing here is a complete cluster fu&*.
We sold our two houses here in 2005 and have been renting ever since.  I cannot tell you how many friends here are set to walk away from their homes.  People owing $400k on a home that is now worth $120k is the norm.
Problem is these homes were complete crap to start with.  Now that we may be staying we see great prices on homes that we do not want.
Homes that were built in the past 10 years have virtually no yard and these subdivisions popped up in the least desirable places.
I can see some areas going the way of Detroit and being bulldozed.
It is a real mess.

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-05-19 02:18 PM

Oversupply is inevitable.  This will put downward pressure on rents.

Astute Observation by Nicholas
2010-05-19 04:37 PM

No yard?  That’s the norm in Irvine.

Astute Observation by Aquanomics
2010-05-19 02:39 PM

I read this twice and still can’t decide if you are serious.

1) Every Las Vegas taking a toxic mortgage/heloc did so willingly.

2) They - lenders and borrowers - should all burn, figuratively speaking of course.

3) We Las Vegans live in a recourse state, meaning creditors will wait (after a strategic default) until you’re back on your feet and then pounce.

The nationwide pity party for “poor, disadvantaged” borrowers has really gotten out of hand.

Astute Observation by es
2010-05-19 02:48 PM

good point.  I do not believe that this will work in any recourse state.  If creditors can attach your wages, etc., you’ve got no prayer of ever coming out from under the mess unless you leave the country.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-19 03:55 PM

“I read this twice and still can’t decide if you are serious.”

That is one of the features that makes this post a good one…

Las Vegas already has a very high bankruptcy rate, and many will need to go through bankruptcy to be fully cleansed.

The borrowers are going to get hosed one way or another, and nothing the Superfund would do would make their consequences any less other than they would get to keep their homes. It does put them on a path to a better future by reducing their debts and payments which is what bankruptcy is supposed to do.

The lenders get hosed by the write downs, which is a fate they are trying to avoid. Widespread strategic default would cause lenders huge losses and make them feel the pain they deserve.

Astute Observation by bltserv
2010-05-19 02:44 PM

I have been going to Vegas almost quarterly for a decade or more. Gaming is off 30%. Hotel room cost down about 20%. Locals dont gamble nearly as much as you would think. Most DONT at all. They can`t afford it. And most long term residents burn out after just a couple years of living there. Last place a Casino worker wants to be after work. When the next round of foreclosures blasts through the system. Vegas will be in even worse shape housing wise. Commercial is sucking wind even worse. Just too much supply now that the growth has contracted so quickly and broadly. All those Europeans I saw a couple years ago when the Euro was at $1.60+. They were vapor on my last trip. Chinese still strong. Midweek the place is damn near empty.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-05-19 07:44 PM

IrvineRenter,
I think the evil banker beaten by the Invincible is mislabeled.  With the govt near unlimited bailouts, the banksters are likely to beat the day lights out of the taxpayers.  I see govt attempts to reinflate bubbles and just actively transferring liability on the defective loans and defective ratings from the banks to the taxpayers.

The comeback of Las Vegas is not a given—Detroit and Gary were booming cities.  Every body wants a car and the US needs steel. LV’s has new competition on the lower end from the Indian casino and on the high end from new Asian gambling centers and older European establishments.  LV still has advantages such as boxing and big draw entertainers and cheap airfare, no passport requirements.  Foods also better than the Indian casino that I’ve visited.

BK will likely be the best path to wipe out the debt in a recourse state. 

LV might need to do some late 1980’s TX style bulldozing of empty houses and commercial buildings.  Detroit is starting the “right sizing.”

Astute Observation by steveforreal
2010-05-20 08:30 PM

I was just in LV less than 3 weeks ago.

The only heavy gamblers are asian.  Many flown in at the hotels’ expense.  (A little known secret is how many gambling addicts there are in the Asian community - but i digress.)

I talked to all the casino workers - consierge, etc. and - to a man they wined at how vegas is dead.  They say all the current patrons are “discount/coupon” tourists, there in heavily discounted rooms who sight-see, go to discounted shows, but do not gamble, do not buy in the Casino stores/spas and DO NOT TIP. 

Even the LV Club scene with its reality TV celebs they pay to come party are in trouble.

LV housing market is dead.  IR, LV was not growing on its own, that was SOCAL home sell money flowing in that caused the run-up.  LV is not a self-contained market.  Until CAL is up running and creating profit, LV RE is not going anywhere.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main