Foreign Buyers Rush to Catch Falling Knives

Oct 14th, 2010  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-10-14 07:27 AM

The FCB consortium officially thanks you for your comments.  One day they hope to achieve your status.  The FCB has the luxury to understand the most valuable asset in life.  This is time, not money.  One day the FCB hopes to achieve your ability to control your time and destiny.  With that they may be able to finally achieve your level of intellect, judgement, stability, and wealth.

Astute Observation by norcal
2010-10-14 05:52 PM

A lot of FCBs are people who managed to save a lot of money in their home nations, where they are either priced out of real estate, or can find only savings accounts yielding about .12% or less.They need a safe place to park their cash and hopefully make some money some day - but they are neither evil, stupid, nor omniscient.

Astute Observation by norcal
2010-10-14 05:54 PM

That is, no more than native people who bought in this market.

Astute Observation by winstongator
Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-10-14 09:50 AM

I would like to see the deadbeats out of their bank-owned shelters, and into rentals. At the same time, I would like to see the banks penalized for every fraudulent affidavit signed by their employees.

I feel so alone in my views. So under-represented. Why should I take sides? I want all applicable parties to suffer consequences.

And, yes, bad affidavits are fraudulent. There’s that word: Fraud. Fraud, fraud, fraud.

Astute Observation by winstongator
2010-10-14 10:12 AM

I don’t think you are alone in your views.  That both parties get what they deserve is what I think also.  I think many would agree with that.

Astute Observation by flyovercountry
2010-10-14 10:27 AM

Count me in on your way of thinking.  Banks should be fully capable of accurately filing their foreclosure paperwork, and should be doing so for everyone who is not making their payments.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-10-14 01:10 PM

IMHO, every single employee, and their bosses, of those who falsified those documents should be tried for fraud.  However, once that is done, the bank still should foreclose on the deadbeats (assuming there were no actual errors in the mortgage paperwork, and if so fix them).

Astute Observation by Kirk
2010-10-14 01:55 PM

You are not alone. I also tire of seeing only the loan owners being blamed or only the banks. It was both.

I blame the banks more though. People spend most of their life at their job. If their job is not finance or economics then they don’t fully grasp how things work and will make panic’ed decisions.

That is how the real estate industry worked during the bubble. Scaring people into buying. Kind of like how W scared people into Iraq. Sure, both W and the voters are to blame. But, who is more to blame?

Astute Observation by breaking the law
2010-10-14 10:55 AM

How about this one?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ontheblock/detail?entry_id=74531

Family yanks 380K out of the housing ATM, defaults, and is evicted.  The house is sold in the foreclosure process to an investor and then resold after there was 40K worth of work to refurbish the house.

The original family now breaks back into the house and aquats as their attorney files a lawsuit. Oh yeah, they did this with their attorney and camera crews by their side.

Worst part is that the police came out Saturday and didn’t arrest anyone.

Game changer here if all foreclosure “victims” start doing this.

No chance I buy a prior foreclosure if this attorney is going to have his clients break into my house after I buy it and I can’t get the police to act.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 11:43 AM

I got a real kick out of reading this story today.  You want to talk about a clearcut case of immoral squatting, here you go.  I might be more sympathetic if these folks had been current on their mortgage when they were evicted but it’s clear that they were not.  Now they are trying to game the system with the “Show Me The Note” nonsense.  They are going to be skewered in the end of all of this and they will be liable for the expenses.  Pretty dumb.  Get ready for another eviction followed by an order of restitution to the investment company that owns the house.

Astute Observation by EMc
2010-10-14 01:41 PM

This is where some of the $380K went.  They even rented a cherry picker to install lights

http://www.danielleslightshow.com/id1.html

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 02:02 PM

OMG ROTFLMFAO if that is in fact the same people.  They can be the poster children of HELOC wasteful spending.  Maybe put out a donations tip jar at this years light show.  I’m sure the neighbors will be sorry to see them go.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 02:20 PM

Email’s away:

Hey Danielle,

Hello from the land of people who pay their bills.  As a renter who pays on time each month every month, it makes me feel great to know that the taxes being taken from my paycheck are being diverted to the banking sector to help pay off the mortgage that you will never repay.  Please enjoy the free rent as you squat in that house while I keep slaving away to make your lender whole. Your entitlement is on me.

Regards,

-David

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 05:18 PM

Astute Observation by honcho
2010-10-14 02:15 PM

Wow.

Maybe the worst legal advice I have ever seen. I saw some bad lawyering going on the last couple of years out of foreclosure attorneys in California, but this one takes the cake.

We have a little rule called tender here in California.  To challenge a foreclosure, you must tender the amount that is owed on the mortgage.

It also looks like the foreclosure has already occured.  There is a heavy presumption that a foreclosure is valid in California once completed (otherwise, you would have chaos regarding title and no one would ever buy a foreclosure).

This case is a loser for these defaulted borrowers.

Astute Observation by Honcho
2010-10-14 02:28 PM

I’ll be a little more precise.

There is a CONCLUSIVE presumption that a foreclosure sale was valid once the trustee’s deed has been delivered.

Wow.  I still can’t believe this.  Wow.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 02:33 PM

One of the commentators on the WSJ article says that the attorney filed his own bankruptcy in Jan 2010.

The observer hilariously refers to it as “the bankrupted leading the bankrupted”

Would you take advice from a lawyer who can’t manage his own finances?

Astute Observation by Major Schadenfreude
2010-10-14 02:35 PM

The observer should have said “the bankrupted leading the bankrupted against the bankrupted” to the detriment of the taxpayer, of course.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 02:38 PM

Good one, Major.  You should post that over there.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 03:33 PM

Oh and apparently the lawyer was arrested the other day for the same stunt with a different family.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39660038/ns/local_news-orange_county_ca/39659722

So this hustler is basically going around finding these vulnerable folks and using them to get some attention for himself.

What kind of lawyer tells their client to go and bust the window with a hammer in front of the cops?  Shouldn’t he be stripped of his license to practice law for instructing people to commit breaking and entering?  WTF?

Astute Observation by Major Schadenfreude
2010-10-14 02:33 PM

It made the news.  No mention of the HELOC\refinance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3biQwMTW-1Y&feature=player_embedded

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 02:52 PM

There you have it, folks.  The media pumping it as some kind of a victory for these losers.  Hopefully the cameras will show up again and we’ll get some good footage of the chairs being carried back out to the car.

How about that lawyer?  Lookin pretty spiffy there in his suit and the media just happened to show up to cover it.  Wow, what a coincidence!

What a fiasco.  A total mockery of the system.

Astute Observation by Kirk
2010-10-14 11:58 PM

And the buyer already remodeled the house!

And the news labeled these freeloaders as “Homeowners”. No! No, they are not! They are squatters for f*cks sake!

Astute Observation by Honcho
2010-10-14 02:46 PM

We are headed for Thunderdome.

Astute Observation by Honcho
2010-10-14 03:59 PM

New development.

This attorney treid it in Newport Beach.  GOt his client arrested.

http://www.ocregister.com/news/pines-271058-home-foreclosure.html

“A Newport Beach man was arrested Wednesday after an attempt to regain possession of the home he claims his family was wrongfully evicted from 16 months ago.

Rene Zepeda, 72, was accompanied by his attorney and several Newport Beach Police officers as he made his way to the back yard of the spacious home at 19 Crystal Cay and, wielding a hammer, broke a window to gain entry. Officers promptly arrested Zepeda and attorney Mike Pines for trespassing and carted them away in a police vehicle.”

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2010-10-14 07:45 AM

It’s a myth that foreign cash buyers are smart money that purchases bargains. FCBs are generally dumb money that overpays for declining assets.

NY Times ~ Japanese Buy New York Cachet With Deal for Rockefeller Center
Published: October 31, 1989

“Richard A. Voell, Rockefeller’s president and chief executive, said Mitsubishi would pay $846 million in cash for a 51 percent interest. The proceeds will go into the family trusts established by John D. Rockefeller Jr. in 1934 and be used to diversify the family’s holdings.”

FAST FORWARD 7 YEARS

NY Times
NBC Will Buy Rockefeller Center Space
Published: May 4, 1996

“Yesterday NBC announced that it would pay $440 million for the 1.6 million square feet it has long occupied at 30 Rockefeller Plaza, the flagship building of the 63-year-old complex.”

“Mitsubishi’s worst fears, however, were realized. The real estate investment trust’s debt service on Rockefeller Center had been predicated on having the annual rents rise as high as $65 a square foot by the early 1990’s; the center was lucky to get half that amount after the recession hit.”

Oh, those smart foreign all cash buyers!  LoL

Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-10-14 09:35 AM

h, those smart foreign all cash buyers!  LoL

You are mistaken, friend.

Manhattan is a backwater, in no way like the center of wealth, commerce, brains, and gracious homes that is Irvine. New York is a city of the past, populated by ungracious blackguards and ruffians, full of jackanapes debtors unknown to Irvine. Far to the east of even Riverside, Manhattan is a cesspool of subprime failure, too far a commute from the good jobs and schools of Irvine to ever enjoy economic growth or home appreciation.

Astute Observation by adeptic
2010-10-14 10:47 AM

Hydro! you hit the nail on the head!!!

thank you for the laughs!  that was great!

Astute Observation by Walter
2010-10-14 08:59 AM

“and just because that price is cut in half doesn’t make the price any better.”

While it still might not be a good investment, half off is better then peak price and you will get to break even much faster then if you had paid peak price.

Or am I missing something?

Astute Observation by winstongator
2010-10-14 10:07 AM

I was going to post a similar sentiment.  It’s also not like there were no FCB’s in south FL in 05-07.  Unlike what is somewhat portrayed in the article, many FCB’s now, especially the Canadians, are planning on using or renting their condos.  South Americans fall into that group too, although many of them were bubble flippers too.

The article also focused on the high-end.  There are lots of sub-50k condos in the Miami-Dade/Broward/Palm Beach tri-county area, and many of those are getting scooped by fcb’s.

Astute Observation by Sac_Boomer
2010-10-14 10:29 AM

I am sucking it up and preparing to buy a cash flow rental in Sac. They are 2+2 condos trading at 1989 prices, that now will yield 7-9% at 10 months occupancy, with 20% down. They would seem undesirable by Irvine standards, but they are > a mile from CSUS, have reasonable HOAs and are popular rentals. If this works, I’ll do it again. My point is, I would never have given this a thought until I started reading this blog. I. R. & company have made it possible to eventually retire debt free, by retiring debt. Thanks!

Astute Observation by bltserv
2010-10-14 11:48 AM

http://www.housingtracker.net/asking-prices/sacramento-california/

Wow. Only down 14% this year. And the Median off over 55% since the peak in 2006. Good luck to ya.

Like I tell IR. Calling a bottom to RE Prices and Rental Prices in these distressed areas is not for the faint of heart or wealth. No its not Detroit. But damn close as far as the damage done to property values.

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-10-14 12:37 PM

I didn’t interpret Sac_boomer’s strategy as calling bottom; he’s buying for cashflow. Who cares what the entry price is if you can afford it and the condo brings in money.

In the worst case where there are more job losses and rents get driven down to the point where it can’t cover costs and the value is hopelessly underwater and he can’t sell, Sac_boomer could quit paying and continue to collect rent until the bank forecloses; and that’s only IF their agents properly review and sign the foreclosure documentation.

If there’s one thing that this past decade has taught me is that traditional beliefs regarding homeownership have gone out the window; there’s no point in trying to be responsible when you know you’ll get bailed out and be able to walk away free. Risk takers get rewarded. Conservative savers get left in the dust.

The only thing that could really change this mentality is to make mortgages full-recourse and prevent mortgage debt from being discharged during bankruptcy.

Astute Observation by Sac_Boomer
2010-10-14 12:42 PM

Thanks! I’m not calling bottom. This is just a point where cash-flow buyers are entering, and I am joining them. It’s strictly a cash flow deal, If the value goes down or never goes up, it won’t matter. I am gambling on the possibilty of rents going down though. I am trying to make this a non-emotional transaction based on what return I can expect and what risk I can accept. I am trying to conciously wipe out the notion of appreciation.

Astute Observation by bltserv
2010-10-14 02:22 PM

Sac.

As long as you consider it gambling your doing just fine. Hopefully you live in Sac still. Having to travel or paying someone to manage your rentals will really take a huge chunk out of the incentive if you live down here. “What do you mean the plumbing is backed up and flooded the unit”. Or my favorite. I am only 3 months behind on my rent. Give me a break please. Or like Lowrdr says. Just collect rents and let em go to forclosure if it does not pan out.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-10-14 01:19 PM

Sacremento bottomed last April 27th, 2009:

http://www.redfin.com/city/16409/CA/Sacramento

(graph in the middle of the page, sold figures)

Basically every single market bottomed in Spring or Summer of 2009.  Now, condos are doing worse than houses there, like in most markets, and might still go down.  Of course, all of this is immaterial for a cash-flow rental property.

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2010-10-14 11:16 AM

It’s foolish to underestimate the impact of FCBs in Irvine
TIC’s 2010 NHC sales surpassed everyone’s expectations.
They’ve ramped up building in Portola Springs, with Laguna Crossings and Orchard Hills on deck.

In other news, residential construction remains at a stand still or is non existent in most parts of the state and country.

Astute Observation by bltserv
2010-10-14 11:56 AM

Hey Ten

I wonder on the Laguna Crossing build how those cash buyers are going to enjoy the concerts blasting below the hill behind them. More than likely this will be the end of the Amphitheater once those go to market next year. Bummer.

Astute Observation by jumpcut
2010-10-14 01:20 PM

You are correct.  Irvine Meadows will be permanently closed prior to buildout of Laguna Crossing.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-10-14 12:51 PM

Ignoring FCBs really shows little understanding of Irvine’s current trends and Irvine’s future.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2010-10-14 11:59 AM

I would like to see more of these 2008 housing gamblers who are throwing in the towel.  We’ll be seeing a massive surge in strategic defaults by the younger folks in this group over the coming year or so as they come to realize they were had back in ‘08 and manipulated into buying overpriced properties from baby boomers.

Astute Observation by BB
2010-10-14 01:11 PM

Wasn’t this home purchased after the meltdown when losing loans were supposedly obtainable?  I’ve seen another situation where a home owner refinanced and is now in the position to short or walk away (and likely will) just three months later.  Are tax payers still picking up the tab for money the banks are giving away in todays market?

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-10-14 01:28 PM

Prices were already falling significantly, but they really fell off a cliff after the stockmarket crash in the fall of 2008.  I guess you could say this happened during the meltdown, but goofy loans were still available in May 2008 if you looked hard enough.

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2010-10-14 03:38 PM

Billion dollar home

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/8063385/Indias-richest-man-Mukesh-Ambani-moves-into-630m-home.html

Astute Observation by breakingBad
2010-10-14 06:19 PM

Don’t confuse FCB’s with new immigrants with good jobs and a healthy habit of saving. I would venture to say that most of the so called FCB’s in Irvine are actually immigrants mistaken as foreign buyers (many potential buyers I bumped into at open houses who carried their conversion in a language other than English actually work in OC), not foreign investors. Historically new immigrants tend to congregate in the same area and prefer to live close to people with the same cultural background. There are also added benefits of stores and restaurants and other social services that cater to people who speak their own language.

Irvine seems to have become a new immigrant center of some sort – particular for people of Asian origin. This trend certainly provides a boon to the local RE market due to new immigrants’ saving habit and obsessive drive to get their offspring into a good school. But markets heavily relying on immigrants’ cash often see their good fortune change over the time for these simple reasons:

1.  The place may reach saturation and high RE prices drive new comers to surrounding cities. New immigrant children will eventually improve the school quality (I mean test scores) in those peripheral areas once critical mass is reached. And buyer pool gets diluted and dwindles.

2.  The 2nd or 3rd generation will not be as attached to the place as their parents and move out. The place will lose its lure over time.

IMHO Irvine is quickly approaching its mature stage as the new Asian immigrant hub. I have seen increasing number of new comers got completely priced out of the market and decided to move to other cities. It’s just a matter of time. Think about all the parts of LA, SF or NY that at one time or another in history that were identified with the people of a particular ethnic group who lived there, and take a look at those places today – and you will know what I mean.

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2010-10-15 07:36 AM

One example is “Little Italy” in NYC…. the real Italians all moved to Jersey and Staten Island, and now it’s now just an extension of Chinatown.

Keep in mind it took 50 years for that transformation to occur, and there were different circumstances that enabled it (one being the development of the Interstate Highway system in the 60s).

Asian immigrants are also aware of the different classes within their culture; there are plenty of other Asian hubs in SoCal that are much less expensive than Irvine (Norwalk/Cerritos comes to mind), but there’s definitely an appeal to Irvine over those places.

I’m not trying to say that Irvine is immune from any price declines (it’s going to fall just as hard as the IE, just give it more time; there’s still a lot of hope and a lot of people looking to put their money somewhere that seems to have more hope than a -2% return); but the Asians buying in Irvine are buying for the same reasons anybody else is.

Astute Observation by Joe R
2010-10-14 10:12 PM

I know from personal experience that
there is a very
close link between foreign cash buyers
and resident immigrants.  I have seen
with my own eyes bank statements of
accounts maintained by recent immigrants
for cash rich relatives who wanted to
get money out of a country with a lot
of corruption (in which they were
heavily involved).

I have been saying that there is a lot
of foreign money being spent in the
desirable middle and upper class
neighborhoods in SoCal.  I’m glad to
see more discussion of this issue here
in IHB.

The national business press has picked
up on the foreclosure slowdown due to
less than ideal documentation, and the
legal cases mentioned above.  I wonder
what the experts at IHB think of the
problem. Will it be possible to
get title insurance if you purchase a
foreclosure in the near future?  This
is something that has me really
worried.  Am I worrying needlessly, IR?

I’m thinking about making some real
estate deals next year if the market
here and in the Northwest are both
favorable.  Hopefully no crazy assault
on the whole residential real estate
mortgage industry by the shysters
representing the deadbeats will
cause everything to grind to a halt.
By deadbeats, I mean the “strategic”
defaulters and HELOC abusers.  If
you’ve lost your home because of an
unforeseen dramatic loss of income,
don’t put the shoe on.  But I still
think that foreclosure is necessary in
your case too. No one is entitled to
make a commitment to pay a debt and
then walk away with everything without
paying.  If you don’t pay on your
car, you get it reposessed.  If you
don’t pay on your home you get it
foreclosed.  In bankruptcy, a Judge
decides by the law what you can and
cannot keep.

Joe

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main