2009 bear rally knife catchers consistently overprice their homes

Aug 31st, 2011  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by awgee
2011-08-31 06:31 AM

So, when someone says that not paying their mortgage is just a business decision, they are saying that they are as untrustworthy in their business life as they are in their personal life.

Astute Observation by Schadendude
2011-08-31 09:35 AM

Can’t disagree more.  A business contract is dispassionate and free of any moral stipulation. It is enforced by our justice system.  That is why provisions for default are contractually agreed upon.  In my business, contracts are cancelled all the time, and the entity cancelling does so for their business benefit.  My organization has very carefully constructed language and penalties to ensure we don’t lose money (and benefit in many cases).  If we fail to negotiate good terms for ourself during the legal process of the deal, the other side had better representation, therefore they “win” in the transaction. 

It has nothing to do with trust.  Trust is what you need if you don’t have a contract.  Trust is a handshake. 

So you’re saying that anytime a business exercises the termination clause they entered into, they’re acting “immorally?”

Sorry, I just don’t follow that logic at all.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2011-08-31 12:13 PM

Even if it is in the contract, it may not be unforceable in court for legal reason and for non-legal reason (political). 
Some animal are just more equal than others.  One should consider the cost to enforce the contact and if it is a loss in court if one should try to make it a Pyrrhic victory for the future.  An example would business contracts that were only enforceable one way, which eventually expanded into the on-going civil right movement.

Astute Observation by awgee
2011-08-31 01:29 PM

Let’s see who I can steal from, as long as I can do it legally.

Astute Observation by Jeff
2011-09-06 01:16 PM

Neither business nor contractual matters are conducted outside of morality.  Would a “business contract” to have someone killed- by a dispassionate, disinterested party- be OK simply becuase the parties deemed it part of their business life, rather than their personal or social lives?

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2011-09-06 02:09 PM

The illegal activities are usually excluded from contract and work agreement.  Sometimes employers need reminding that the agreement is for lawful actives and does not include illegal activities.  When an employee needs to remind their company on these matters, it usually time to leave.

The modern business paradign is to maximize profits, which includes personal profits.  This is very different from 50 years ago.  The application of these changes the demise of many American business.  I hear more talk about helping the communities from business, but see actually less care in the decision process from companies.

Astute Observation by Kelja
2011-08-31 10:52 AM

Let’s see—- you’re saying that if someone is horribly underwater on their home - let’s say to the tune of 200 - 300 - 400K - or more they should tough it out? They made a mistake, they were stupid, they were taken advantage of, whatever caused it, they should walk away.

Banks do it all the time.

Astute Observation by winstongator
2011-08-31 07:53 AM

I think the overpricing of 09 sales has more to do with those people thinking they got a great deal then and wanting to cash in on it now.  Also, those listing homes purchased closer to 2006 may have been struggling with (or not making) payments for a longer period than buyers in 2009, by virtue of their being in the home longer and having paid a higher price.  There probably were some great deals then, mostly foreclosure & other distressed sales, and I’ve seen a lot of very good relocation situations where the relocation firm sold at what might be considered below market price to find a buyer quicker.  I’ve also seen a few where the owners have moved, and not been distressed, but lowered the price quickly to finally move the property.

One thing that will give people pause when buying today, as opposed to the 5-15-25% per-year appreciation days is the >6% transaction costs buying & selling property.  If it takes you 3 years to save the 20% down payment, and then you have to turn right around and sell, losing 6% of the sales price, that is a full year of savings lost.  To many, that is a significant downer.

Astute Observation by architectdave
2011-08-31 08:20 AM

I know of a family who aren’t even bubble rally buyers listing their 2003-purchased Irvine condo at what appears to be about 25-35% higher than the current comparable market in hopes of simply covering the outstanding mortgage, let alone the closing costs for resale. They’ve actually paid down the original mortgage a good $10K on top of a higher than 20% down payment and they don’t have a second or even a HELOC. I think we could consider them responsible borrowers, other than being caught like everyone else 7-10 years ago in buying overvalued property and getting very little for what was paid for. Even for them, pre-bubble, it’s simply a matter of time before capitulation sets in if they want to sell. Or else stay put and continue to pay the overpriced mortgage on a tiny home.

Astute Observation by lunatic fringe
2011-08-31 08:41 AM

Ugh, I would hate to be paying the summer AC bill for a 3600 SF home in Portola Springs…

Astute Observation by Casual Observer
2011-08-31 08:49 AM

Don’t you all think this will be the case for the foreseeable future?  IMO, the move away from foreclosures and toward short sales was designed exactly to deflate the bubble over a longer period of time rather than taking the losses in sharp intervals.  However, the public wasn’t told about this strategy.  Instead, everytime there is any upward movement in the marketplace, it is deemed a victory….“We’ve reached bottom!!”  “Time to buy!”  The “rally” in Irvine in 2009-2010 was a false market.  With upwards of those ‘buyers’ paying cash, many here on tourist visa’s, a temporary buying surge happened.  NOT a market recovery.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-08-31 02:27 PM

“Don’t you all think this will be the case for the foreseeable future?  IMO, the move away from foreclosures and toward short sales was designed exactly to deflate the bubble over a longer period of time rather than taking the losses in sharp intervals.”

Yes. I also think the new crop of buyers will be less distressed, so they will hold out for their wishing prices longer.

All of this will make for lower transaction volumes and many hungry realtors.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2011-08-31 08:56 AM

Wow, $8300/month cash outlay to “own” this place with 20% down.  That’s a bitter number to swallow!  Good luck selling this place, but I’m sure there’s a FCB waiting in the wings…hahahaha.

Astute Observation by Pwned
2011-08-31 09:21 AM

I’ve seen a lot of anecdotal evidence that this is happening, but it’s interesting to see the stats back it up. On my street two very similar houses were listed - one at $689k and one at $795k. Guess which one sold within a few weeks? I think there’s a year or more of this silliness built into the system, as sellers desperately cling to the illusion that they didn’t over-borrow. And yes, some of them will win the lottery, with foolish buyers (i.e. non-IHB readers) stepping in to save their shirts. There’s a very limited number of those buyers tho, and really, even the people who bought that $689k house overpaid and will be trapped for years…

Astute Observation by Kelja
2011-08-31 10:54 AM

Didja hear? Obama is gonna save all those underwater homeowners, um, loan-owners, next week.

And he’ll screw us savers and renters.

No justice.

Astute Observation by SoIrvine
2011-08-31 11:39 AM

Isnt Portola Springs located right next door to the Orange County landfield (OC dump) ???

Who is their right ming would pay lots of money to live near a toxic dump?

Ewwwwwwwwwwww….....

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2011-08-31 12:21 PM

Is that an active dump?

Turtle Ridge is near an inactive dump.  The odor is strong (swamp/gargage odor) at time along Culvert.  The kids said they could smell it. I looked into it more and found the old dump site.

I don’t know the toxicity level, but the smell was a factor in not buying for me and feeling that the nice looking houses were way over priced for the location that smelled.

Astute Observation by irvine_home_owner
2011-08-31 01:12 PM

Yes… the dump is active:

Bowerman Landfill

You can hear the trucks going up Sand Canyon all the time.

Astute Observation by phil
2011-09-01 11:19 AM

Wait, is that what is causing the loud sound/vibration I hear periodically in the daytime and early evening?  I live near Irvine Blvd/Yale.

If not the trucks, does anyone know the answer to this mystery?

Astute Observation by irvine_home_owner
2011-08-31 11:55 AM

2 weeks without Hedonic Data… I’m going through withdrawal.

The one remarkable thing about today’s listing is the large 8300sft view lot… but it’s next to the toll roads. I’m actually surprised that StanPac was able to sell these Serra homes for over $1mil during the bubble’s deflation.

Astute Observation by FreedomCM
2011-08-31 01:04 PM

View lots?

I looked through the pics, and saw neither coastline, nor Catalina.

Astute Observation by irvine_home_owner
2011-08-31 01:09 PM

I didn’t say what kind of view.  grin

I do think you can see those things claimed in the listing… on a perfectly smogless day.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-08-31 02:30 PM

I have been up on the ridge in Portola Springs on a clear day, and you can see the ocean. It is a very thin line on the horizon, but it is visible. The views are just okay compared to some of the more interesting views in Turtle Rock and Turtle Ridge.

Astute Observation by SoIrvine
2011-08-31 04:31 PM

“View lots?

I looked through the pics, and saw neither coastline, nor Catalina.

But you can smell the active landfill right next door! hahaha LOL

People are soooo very STUPID to be paying $1 million for a house, that is located right next door to a toxic shithole landfill.

Just goes to show you just how STUPID some people are….

Astute Observation by Jaysen Gillespie
2011-08-31 01:29 PM

@IHO: Glad you enjoy the hedonic analyses.  I’m going to have to ask irvinerenter to keep your withdrawl trembing down with a pleasant drip of daily, though non-hedonic, real estate analysis for the coming weeks.

That said, the hedonic analyses work well on a quarterly basis, and I’m very interested to see what the Q3 numbers look like.  Q3 includes July/Aug/Sep months in which we’ve heard a lot of anecdotes about continued declines in price.  The data will allow us to see exactly what the Irvine price trend has done in Q3.  Should be ready towards the beginning of October. 

Q4 should be even more interesting, as it represents a seasonally downward quarter coupled with renewed concern about a slowing economy.

Astute Observation by IndyLew
2011-08-31 04:25 PM

Hello?  What, suddenly “owners” set the opening price on residential property, not real estate agents after that famous “free market analysis!” Agents have 95% of all sales go through their hands and MLS.  What, no agents help set too high a price?  gosh.  Well, in the real world, Agents have and will always promise anything, especially an unrealistic price, to get the listing first and foremost; one can cut the price later when the owner is beaten down, and thanks to the cozy deal where real estate agents don’t offer more than 3% off any other agent’s property even with the “real” price, well, who’s to challenge this age old game? The real estate agents are as opportunistic and trained to get that listing at all costs, as a car salesman or time share salesman or mortgage salesman is at their unique and disturbing manipulative craft(while appearing “professional” to gain that trust, natch).

Astute Observation by jb
2011-09-01 07:46 AM

Turtle Ridge is next to a dump..and the smell of methane gas is present. Portola Springs is next to an active dump. 5,000 homes have been approved for the “Great Park”, which sits on decades of toxic material. I wonder how the One Ford Road residents in Newport are feeling these days. Their beautiful homes were built on remediated soil after decades of toxic dumping by Ford/Loral/Lockheed. But I’m certain that they were assured that everything is within tolerance. Nothing to see here.

Astute Observation by Misstrial
2011-09-01 09:23 AM

So true. And Sage Private School is built right on top of methane deposits the equivalent of small bombs.

Just think of what could occur during a movement of the Newport-Inglewood fault?

~Misstrial

Astute Observation by Casual Observer
2011-09-01 11:11 AM

Something actually newsworthy happened today.  I got an e-mail solitation from Lennar to me as a Broker to sign up to be a VIP Agent @4% commission for any and all of their projects in San Diego, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties.  IMO that is signaling a major change in the way new homes will be sold.  Most other states operate this way and have for years.  They may continue to have a reduced on-site sales staff, but rely on local realtors for more than just close-outs.

Astute Observation by jb
2011-09-02 07:16 AM

Misstrial - How can that be true? Is there a way to verify the Sage Hill/methane? That is scary.

Astute Observation by Jeff
2011-09-06 01:20 PM

IHB- I like and respect this blog tremendously, which is why I beg you not to use awful business speak like “takeaway.”  Unless of course you’re talking about take out food in Australia.

Ken Smith’s “Junk English” shows how phony our corporate language really is, e.g. “skill sets” instead of “skills.”

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main