The double dip is showing up in the NAr statistics, and the spin and bullshit from the NAr is laughable.
Irvine Home Address … 35 ABRAZO AISLE Irvine, CA 92614
Resale Home Price …… $249,000
Lost in a dream
Nothing is what it seems
Searching my head
For the words that you said
I try to let go, but I know
We'll never end 'til we're dust
We lied to each other again
But I wish I could trust
Megadeth — Trust
One of the key features of many posts on the IHB is the art of critical reading. There is so much garbage in the mainstream media, and corrupt organizations like the National Association of realtors use this cesspool to dispense its bullshit in hopes that someone, somewhere will take it at face value. I read real estate articles every day looking for facts, truth, and insightful analysis. I have only ever found facts, questionable facts, in NAr press releases. Truth and insightful analysis is always lacking.
It's been a couple of weeks since I declared victory over the local realtor association, but the NAr is still practicing the dark art of spinning bullshit into gold. Today we are going to look at their July sales report and see what truth we can salvage from the published debris.
The specifics of data, spin and bullshit
As a reminder:
Data: Factual statements that present statistics or some measurable phenomenon. Presenting data is ostensibly the reason for a real estate press release. However, the real intention is to spin the data or otherwise manipulate the interpretation.
Spin: The offered interpretation of data that forwards the agenda of the organization issuing the press release. Spin is usually a plausible interpretation that is most often taken out of context, knowingly, by the authors.
Bullshit: An interpretation of data that is either not factual, or the data itself is not factual, or an interpretation that is not plausible based on the data. Bullshit is an obvious lie an organization passes off to a gullible public in hopes that nobody catches on.
With that, let's see what the esteemed National Association of realtors had to say about the dismal market conditions in July.
Washington, DC, August 10, 2011
Median existing-home prices declined modestly in the second quarter with 27 percent of metropolitan areas experiencing price gains from a year ago, while state home sales declined from the second quarter of 2010, according to the latest quarterly report by the National Association of Realtors®.
Notice how the declines are downplayed while the increases are emphasized. What's worse is the emphasized increase masks the extremely negative flipside: 72% of MSAs experienced declines from a year ago. Declining prices and declining sales is a sign that more declines are on the way. If sales had been up, at least an argument could be made that buyers are entering the market to get bargains.
The median existing single-family home price rose in 41 out of 151 metropolitan statistical areas1 (MSAs) in the second quarter from the same period in 2010, including four with double-digit increases; one was unchanged and 109 areas showed price declines. In the first quarter, 34 metro areas had posted gains from a year earlier.
Notice how the sentence above starts with spin to put a good face on the really bad news that follows.
Do you think an NAr spokesman will risk what little credibility they have and use this opportunity to call a bottom?
Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said home prices have been moderating. “Median home prices have been moving up and down in a relatively narrow range in many markets, which shows a stabilization trend,” he said. “Markets showing consistent price stability or increases are those with solid labor market conditions, such as in Washington, D.C.; San Antonio; or Fargo, N.D.”
Falling prices during the one period of the year when prices nearly always rise is certainly not a sign of stabilization. Think of what will happen this fall and winter — a time when prices nearly always fall — after the conforming limit is lowered and the already scarce buyer pool goes into hibernation.
Yun noted the median price measurement reflects the types of homes that are selling during the quarter and can be misleading at times. “The level of foreclosures, which can artificially depress median prices, can vary notably in given markets. The annual price gauge smoothes out the quarterly swings and has shown fairly stable price trends in most markets.”
Foreclosures don't “artificially depress” anything. Foreclosures are the market. That doesn't mean there are not some markets (like Las Vegas) where prices have been pushed well below their historic levels of support, but that is not “artificial.” It is merely the state of the market right now. Foreclosures are going to impact prices for quite some time.
He added the housing market should be stronger. “With home prices in a broad trough and historically low mortgage interest rates, high housing affordability conditions and rising rents could stimulate a more rapid sales recovery if banks get back into the business of lending to more creditworthy borrowers,” Yun said.
Yun was in rare form with that sentence. In some markets, sales and prices should be stronger. Mortgage rates are very low, and affordability is excellent in markets where prices are also low. While it's true that rising rents could stimulate a more rapid sales recovery, this isn't very likely because rents will not rise quickly in a weak economy, and many wouldbe buyers will be forced to rent because the short sale or foreclosure on their record keeps them out of the buyer pool. The bullshit about lowering lending standards is a common meme in realtor circles. It's an easy thing for them to advocate as they take none of the risk but obtain all of the benefit.
NAR’s Housing Affordability Index stood at 176.6 in the second quarter, the third highest on record after the first quarter of 2011 and fourth quarter of 2010. The index measures the relationship between median home price, median family income and mortgage interest rates; the higher the index, the greater household purchasing power. Recordkeeping began in 1970.
I haven't studied the NAr housiing affordability index. I don't have to in order to recognize it is an unreliable gauge because I know the source is not trustworthy. Back during the housing bubble, prices were so high that their affordability measure stated that only about 2% of the population could afford the median sales price. So what did they do? They changed their affordability metrics from measuring against a 30-year amortizing mortgage with a 20% down payment to using an interest-only mortgage with a 10% down payment. Suddenly, prices were affordable again.
The national median existing single-family home price was $171,900 in the second quarter, down 2.8 percent from $176,800 in the second quarter of 2010. The median is where half sold for more and half sold for less. Distressed homes,2 typically sold at a discount of about 20 percent, accounted for 33 percent of second quarter sales, down from 39 percent in the first quarter; they were 32 percent a year earlier.
Did you notice that distressed sales have increased over last years high level? You weren't supposed to. They put in the factoid about 39% of properties were distressed sales in the first quarter to make you think distressed sales are declining when, in fact, they are increasing.
Total state existing-home sales, including single-family and condo, declined 5.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate3 of 4.86 million in the second quarter from 5.14 million in the first quarter, and were 12.7 percent below a 5.57 million pace during the second quarter of 2010. June 2010 was the closing deadline for the home buyer tax credit.
Half way through the press release, and we finally get to some very revealing information. Sales are down — dramatically. Sales dropped 5.4% from the first quarter to the second quarter. This is typically when both sales volumes and prices are rising. Further, the rate of decline as compared to last year is an astonishing 12.7%. He tries to make excuses by mentioning the tax credit, and that was certainly part of the reason, but the market is very weak right now, and it's more than just the removal of market supports.
NAR President Ron Phipps, broker-president of Phipps Realty in Warwick, R.I., said the key to healthy housing is credit access. “It’s frustrating for many creditworthy potential home buyers to realize that when they’re ready to make a move, banks remain risk averse,” he said.
Yes, I imagine is very frustrating for people who previously could make up income numbers and get 100% financing to be faced with the cold reality of needing good credit, verifiable income, and a down payment. Of course, lenders may find an innovative solution to the problem….
“People with good jobs, long-term plans and who are willing to stay well within their means deserve an opportunity to realize their American dream of home ownership. When banks return to normal and safe but sensible lending standards, housing will be able to contribute its traditional share to economic growth.”
People with good credit, stable jobs, and a down payment are buying homes. The problem is there are not enough of those people to absorb the supply from the people who couldn't sustain ownership.
It really annoys me when I read these calls from realtors to lower lending standards. Let them put their money at risk if they believe standards are too tight. If they are right, they have an opportunity to make large profits from the low default rates they will experience on the loans they underwrite to all the creditworthy people they believe deserve loans.
Housing has no traditional share of economic growth. Homebuilding does, but we built too many homes in the 00s, and we are currently recycling that inventory through foreclosure. Realtor commissions don't do anything for economic growth other than through the spending power of realtors themselves. realtors add no value to homes, they merely profit from the sale of them. Perhaps they add service value to the buyers and sellers — at least I hope we do — but by and large, realtors drain value from real estate not add to it. If the thousands of realtors who left the profession got trained in something more productive, then we might see some benefit from the housing bubble after all.
Yun clarified the point on economic growth. “The direction of the economy will be determined principally by the housing market recovery, and indications now are pointing toward only a modest recovery,” he said.
Yun couldn't resist the temptation to interject more bullshit into the press release.
The share of all-cash home purchases was 30 percent in the second quarter, up from 25 percent in the second quarter of 2010. Investors, who make up the bulk of cash purchasers, accounted for 19 percent of second quarter transactions, up from 14 percent a year ago.
Increased sales by cash buyers is a sign of a market bottoming. When cash buyers come in, prices have reached market clearing levels. This is the only real good news in the data presented, and the NAr didn't recognize it as such.
First-time buyers purchased 35 percent of homes, down from 46 percent in the second quarter of 2010.
This is an important tidbit they buried deep in the press release. Together with cash buyers and investors, first-time homebuyers are key to the market's recovery. If first-time homebuyers are not absorbing the inventory, prices will continue to decline, and sales will continue to suffer.
Repeat buyers accounted for a 56 percent market share in the second quarter, up from 40 percent a year earlier.
These are probably repeat cash buyers. There isn't much of a move up market, particularly as prices continue to slide.
In the condo sector, metro area condominium and cooperative prices – covering changes in 54 metro areas – showed the national median existing-condo price was $169,200 in the second quarter, which is 3.5 percent below the second quarter of 2010. Fourteen metros showed increases in the median condo price from a year ago and 40 areas had declines.
Notice how the NAr presents the good news first to blunt the impact of the really bad news that follows.
The rest is region specific data generally showing the same pattern of price and sales declines.
Regionally, the median existing single-family home price in the Northeast rose 2.0 percent to $245,600 in the second quarter from a year ago. Existing-home sales in the Northeast declined 4.6 percent in the second quarter to a level of 763,000 and are 19.9 percent below the second quarter of 2010.
The median existing single-family home price in the Midwest fell 5.4 percent to $139,800 in the second quarter from the same period in 2010. Existing-home sales in the Midwest were down 3.1 percent in the second quarter to a pace of 1.05 million and are 18.3 percent below a year ago.
In the South, the median existing single-family home price declined 2.7 percent to $153,000 in the second quarter from a year earlier. Existing-home sales in the South fell 3.4 percent in the second quarter to an annual rate of 1.89 million and are 9.9 percent below the second quarter of 2010.
The median existing single-family home price in the West declined 3.1 percent to $218,000 in the second quarter from the second quarter of 2010. Existing-home sales in the West dropped 10.8 percent in the second quarter to a level of 1.16 million and are 6.2 percent below a year ago.
The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing 1.1 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.
The NAr is the voice for real estate, and they always have the same message, “Its always a good time to buy or sell a house.”
840 square feet that once appraised for $386,500
The owner of today's featured property is a typical Ponzi. He managed to milk this property for $262,350 from his $3,850 down payment back in 1999. I could compute the return on investment, but it would be astronomical. It's owners who had experiences like this guy who keep kool aid intoxication alive. He won the housing lottery, so anyone can, right?
- This property was purchased for $128,000 on 11/24/1999. The owner used a $124,850 first mortgage and a $3,850 down payment.
- On 12/26/2000, just over one year later, he got his first mortgage equity withdrawal with a new $136,000 first mortgage. That probably paid off a few Christmas gifts.
- On 10/18/2004 he refinanced again with a $146,300 first mortgage.
- On 2/22/2005 he refinanced with a $236,000 first mortgage and obtained a $90,000 HELOC. With those two loans, he nearly doubled his mortgage, but he got $150,000 to play with.
- On 8/2/2006 he got an Option ARM with a 2% teaser rate for $344,000.
- On 10/5/2006 WAMU gave him a $42,500 HELOC. This loan was particularly stupid. I can't believe banks gave out seconds on top of Option ARMs. They deserve to lose their money on that one.
- Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $262,350. We know the guy didn't spend much on the property as the description says it's a fixer. I would be shocked if I hadn't seen a hundred of these before.
What amazes me about properties like this one is that they appraised at such a high value. This is an 840SF 2 bedroom 2 bath condo. It is comparable to an Irvine Company apartment that likely rented for about $1,800 per month back in 2006 when the final loan was approved. Since the final refinance was with an Option ARM, this owner probably had payments near rental parity. Like many others, he believed he would be able to serial refinance into another Option ARM and pull out more HELOC booty when the loan payments were due to increase. In other words, he went Ponzi.
This property is available for sale via the MLS.
Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707
Irvine House Address … 35 ABRAZO AISLE Irvine, CA 92614
Resale House Price …… $249,000
Sq. Ft.: 840
Property Type: Residential, Condominium
Style: One Level, Other
Year Built: 1988
On Redfin: 3 days
This floor plan is hardly ever on the market and its a lower unit located near the pool and has an interior tract location it needs a little TLC and is reflected in the price.
Proprietary IHB commentary and analysis
Resale Home Price …… $249,000
House Purchase Price … $128,000
House Purchase Date …. 11/24/1999
Net Gain (Loss) ………. $106,060
Percent Change ………. 82.9%
Annual Appreciation … 5.7%
Cost of Home Ownership
$249,000 ………. Asking Price
$8,715 ………. 3.5% Down FHA Financing
4.19% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate
$240,285 ………. 30-Year Mortgage
$77,754 ………. Income Requirement
$1,174 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment
$216 ………. Property Tax (@1.04%)
$50 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)
$52 ………. Homeowners Insurance (@ 0.25%)
$276 ………. Private Mortgage Insurance
$241 ………. Homeowners Association Fees
$2,009 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays
-$185 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)
-$335 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment (Amortization)
$13 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)
$51 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
$1,554 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership
Cash Acquisition Demands
$2,490 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%
$2,490 ………. Closing Costs @1%
$2,403 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan
$8,715 ………. Down Payment
$16,098 ………. Total Cash Costs
$23,800 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves
$39,898 ………. Total Savings Needed