My wife and I both work for a Big 4 Accounting Firm, with offices and transferable jobs in every major US (and international) city. It would be very easy for us to pick a spot on the map and go. As the cost of California has skyrocketed out of our range in the past 5 years, we have gone through the pro’s and con’s of leaving many, many times. I travel a lot with my job, and get to see a lot of different places—- many times my wife will join me for a long weekend in these other cities, to assess and see if we could make a go of it there. Most recently we have spent time in Chicago, Dallas, and Seattle. But I have to say….Each time we come home with the same answer: The only problem with leaving California is that you have to leave California.
Sure, there are a lot warts here as I am sure we all could spend hours documenting. That said, there are a lot of things to love about it—- and things that you will never find anywhere else. So for us, while all those places have certain merits (mainly the cost of housing), we just cannot reconcile what we get for what we would have to give up. Sure, we could buy a big house in Dallas or Chicago, but geez—- your house better be big, because you are spending half of the year indoors because of the weather—- either too cold or too hot. Personally, I would rather be out enjoying the world (and all that So Cal has to offer) with a little smaller house.
I’d be interested if anyone else goes through this similar love/hate relationship….Love the place, hate the cost of living….And what your decision has been?