Janet - 19 December 2008 07:35 PM

You consider her pasting her comment in two places at (essentially) the same time, “two reprimands”.  That is shockingly dishonest of you.  Your original implication was that I did not obey and had to be told twice, which is a blatant lie.  You could apologize, but I know you won’t.

My original implication is that you are a bold faced liar.

You are all a pack of jackals, looking to line your pockets with the flesh of responsible homeowners everywhere, ignorant of the pain your ilk causes. I don’t know how you leeches live with yourselves. There is the innocent blood on the hands of all you vile voyeuristic scum.

Karma will get you.

Damn, “Who let the dogs out?”. Who,Who, Who.

I haven’t checked in for a few days and this thread went wild. I think it may have disrupted my harmony clear up on my mountain top in Arizona. I felt the bad vibes!!

Enjoy!

Janet - 19 December 2008 08:18 PM

I did not knowingly put people into homes they could not afford.  I was in wholesale, with a relatively conservative lender.  You should apologize.

You were at Barrington Capital (Page 13)

http://www.ocaor.com/ocbrjune06 (1).pdf

You were at Windsor Capital (post 89)

http://forums.redfin.com/rf/board/message?board.id=LA_OC&thread;.id=75&page=9

You were at Coldwell Banker:

http://realtyagentsportal.com/local/4/156556/California

People who work wholesale don’t ususally shill as “Honest Broker” and get headshots in industry rags, but get down with your bad self!  Never let the FACTS get in the way of you LIE.

no_vaseline - 20 December 2008 04:42 AM

People who work wholesale don’t ususally shill as “Honest Broker” and get headshots in industry rags, but get down with your bad self!  Never let the FACTS get in the way of you LIE.

Owwww… i ate too much and have to pee from laughing so hard!

-bix

Janet - 18 December 2008 09:49 PM

I would suggest removing this, Irvine Renter.

I would suggest removing this, Irvine renter.

You have proved diddly-squat.  Most people who have active licenses hang them with various organizations even when they are not using them.  In fact, you can (and should) keep your license hung somewhere even for your own personal use (as I did with CB).  You have zero evidence of, well, anything!  And even if you did, which you don’t, why is that an issue?  This isn’t child molestation we are talking about here, it is a profession with knowledge (which I shared here many times) and skills that many people want and (desperately) need.  Your emotional Tourette Syndrome outburts are laughable!  Lest you forget:  I posted from day 1 under my real name (something that will never, ever be possible for you).  Notice the 634 posts under “Janet”?  It wasn’t until I found out there are unstable people on the interweb who can, and will, terrorize you that I decided to be (more) anonymous!  Notice how you don’t scare me any more?  Thank you for that.  You have nothing left in your arsenal.

You were way more fun on Lassner’s blog.  Here you are just a sad bitter little person.

Janet - What’s your take on the closing price for 16613 Sonora?  It’s something like $235 per sf?  Is it a fluke or new market reality for Columbus Grove?

IPO, the adjustment in SFR prices in Columbus Grove is old news.  They were overpriced, and experienced most of their drop in 2006.  In 2006, Lantana had already dropped 20%.  Sonora is a large home, thus you see a low psf due to economy of scale.  It went for $908,000.  I haven’t seen what’s in it.  I know you hate CG, but many people like it.  I know you think a townhome is a crappy choice, but many people like them.  I love not having to care for a yard, after my last home, it is a relief.  It is a lifestyle choice, just not yours.

Janet - 19 December 2008 07:39 PM

Comps up to six months are fine.  Some of those were quite recent, and could be adjusted to another floor plan.  I just scored 100% on a Broker Price Opinon test, so I think I have a clue!

Tests don’t accurately reflect reality sometimes.

I just closed escrow on my house 2 weeks ago so I think I would have a clue too. The appraiser would not use a 6-month old comp if more recent comps existed. And… they don’t just use the exact same floorplan/builder/model… they’ll look at other homes in the vicinity with the same features.

I’m sure this the same story for any sale nowadays as banks are more strict on house valuations considering the decreasing market.

Ask anyone who has sold their home recently if 6-month old comps are looked at heavily.

In theory (or on tests), 6-month comps may be fine… but in reality… not so much.

Also, I never said the unit will go for $799,000, I said a comp exists.  The irresponsible trustee opened the door to a vulture and that means he will sell it quickly for what he can get.  I swear, it is near impossible to have an honest discussion here.

So what’s the point of illustrating a 6-month old comp of $785k (you keep saying $799k)?

I’m merely pointing out that it’s not a good comp. And if it sold for $800k in 07, and $785k 6 months ago… would you not, in your broker pricing opinion, valuate the price even lower?

Appraisals on townhomes and condos are slightly different than those on SFRs, as they are a far more uniform product type.  Condos and townhomes should always have 2-3 comps from within the complex, and one from outside.  You are correct about 3 month old comps being used….when they are available.  In my example, they were not available, therefore the expansion to six months.  In a rapidly-moving market, a time adjustment would simply be made to the comps, if needed.

The disprepancy on the $799,000 (MLS) versus $765,000 (Recorder) is due to a data conflict.  I conceded the $765,000 is likely correct.

Stop saying Janet.  I’m trying to relax over here….