Anyone been watching the Towering Inferno at Marquee Place? |
|
|
| Posted: 12 February 2008 05:58 PM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 51 ]
|
|
|
Condo
Total Posts: 435
Joined 2008-01-31
|
Eh, i’d take a west facing unit on one of the upper floors for 400k. Seems mighty inconvenient, but the view *might* make up for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 12 February 2008 07:17 PM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 52 ]
|
|
|
Custom Estate
Total Posts: 5364
Joined 2007-01-28
|
New requirement for the ridiculous HOA…
On Friday nights, there must be an open bar happy hour, from 5pm to 9pm, for residents with up to 3 guests, with only premium alcohol (no well crap, and gawd forbid grey goose), and cheap, but tasty tapas. Hey, if the towers in SF have the same high HOAs, but with chefs like Michael Mina and Gary Danko, then I expect the same here in OC. I mean, all the bulls like to compare OC to SF, so then the amenities need to match, if not exceed what they have there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 13 February 2008 12:50 PM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 53 ]
|
|
|
Condo
Total Posts: 370
Joined 2007-07-23
|
the problem with the south or west facing units is they get really hot from the afternoon sun beating on the glass, plus the light shows all the dirt on the windows. These units would require shades most of the day, preventing one from really enjoying the view. A north or east high rise view stays cooler and the windows appear cleaner and you can leave the shades up to enjoy the view during the day. Unlike a house, highrises just have views in just one or two directions. Just my two bits worth of observations from living in a highrise for a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 11 March 2008 06:48 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 54 ]
|
|
|
McMansion
Total Posts: 1038
Joined 2007-05-03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 11 March 2008 04:05 PM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 55 ]
|
|
|
Custom Estate
Total Posts: 3693
Joined 2007-04-22
|
morekaos, thanks for the links….but Aqua is not a luxury condo. It was cheaply built, the cabinents are low grade….the whole place is CHEAPO! Nice location though….but nowhere near worth the listing prices. It also looks like a 2nd "condo fee" (special assessment?) has been tacked on… I recall the building to the East flooded (went unnoticed for a weekend) a few months prior to completion. They had to rip out 15 floors of drywall and carpet and start over. Could it be a mold problem ? Hmmm….. I do like the views though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 12 March 2008 01:23 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 56 ]
|
|
|
McMansion
Total Posts: 1038
Joined 2007-05-03
|
No doubt, I just wanted to post a taste of what is going on elswhere. There are 2 other projects in that area that seem to be blowing up. These few listings show how much the pain has set in. Marquee listings only show 1 out ouf 19 or 20 purchase prices in order to compare where the original buyer sits. Probably alot of presale buyers so we don’t really know what they paid. The LB Towers are a bit older and the price tracks are still fresh in the snow
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 13 March 2008 02:05 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 57 ]
|
|
|
McMansion
Total Posts: 1038
Joined 2007-05-03
|
Also the dues in these units runs $525 a month. Not 1200 at marquee but as trooper says with a second "condo fee" added it is up there still. What a joke. Tower living cannot be worth all that
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 13 March 2008 02:11 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 58 ]
|
|
|
Custom Estate
Total Posts: 4257
Joined 2007-05-16
|
Many Highrise development in OC enlisted John McMonigle as their selling agent hoping to borrow his image and branding to promote the lifestyle of rich and good taste.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 13 March 2008 02:20 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 59 ]
|
|
|
McMansion
Total Posts: 1038
Joined 2007-05-03
|
I don’t even think that magician can extracate them before they suffocate
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 06:43 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 60 ]
|
|
|
IAC Rental
Total Posts: 157
Joined 2007-10-02
|
I thought you all would be interested to hear - Lennar and Intergulf are now officially shopping the Astoria building for sale. They are looking for an apartment investor to take it off their hands for $800K per unit (which is about their cost). Problem is that it is worth way less than that as an apartment buildings - rents can’t get near high enough to support that valuation.
At least this is a better attempt to get out than the one KB took by burning down their Warner Center development this morning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 06:59 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 62 ]
|
|
|
Living with Parents
Total Posts: 99
Joined 2007-01-05
|
Oh, this gives a whole new spin on "Towering Inferno."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 07:11 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 63 ]
|
|
|
IAC Rental
Total Posts: 157
Joined 2007-10-02
|
Inside info. But it is not rumor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 07:21 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 64 ]
|
|
|
Condo
Total Posts: 307
Joined 2008-01-21
|
Joe, are you a broker? Who is the listing agent/firm? Thanks for this update. Any news on A-Town?
That KB project was going down in flames anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 07:34 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 65 ]
|
|
|
McMansion
Total Posts: 1195
Joined 2007-05-01
|
So jcaraway.
Like I said way back in this thread. Lennar is bailing out while the company is still in business. Lets see who buys it ? Nobody in the right mind would fund a purchase like that. The business plan that built these High Rises is in a shredder now. What about the rest of the CPW development ? Looks like its just going to sit for a few years empty ?
[ Edited: 24 March 2008 08:03 AM by bltserv ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 08:03 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 66 ]
|
|
|
IAC Rental
Total Posts: 157
Joined 2007-10-02
|
I am not a broker. I am an investor. I don’t think Astoria is formally listed yet so I probably shouldn’t say who is shopping it around.
A Town is on hold and I would be shocked to really ever see it done in it’s current form. That will have to wait until the next cycle. And even then I imagine they will have to amend it to be 4 story over garage parking as opposed to high rise. I don’t know how high rise can pencil again in Orange County for a long time.
KB does formally have their Warner Center (the one that burned today) and Platinum Triangle properties listed for sale with Moran & Co. I am not sure why they appear to be holding off on their Irvine project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 08:41 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 67 ]
|
|
|
Condo
Total Posts: 307
Joined 2008-01-21
|
KB thinks they have a purchaser lined up for that one.
Just nod your head if O/A is listing.
So bltserv.
We keeping score? Your claim was that this was a blight and you were afraid lennar would walk away leaving half completed buildings that would crumble to the ground (you were also afraid of holes). First of all, this is just the high rise building, not the entire community. I still stand by my claim that this was an ignorant remark as someone, whether it be lennar or an apartment builder or the bank, will come in and complete construction. I’ve been by the site and it’s obvious that they are still proceeding the completion of the existing buildings.
IMHO, here’s lennar’s plan, they are going to complete construction on all projects in progress at CPW and sell the completed buildings to an EQR or some other institutional investor. They can’t sell as-is to another builder to complete construction as the liability to assume construction mid-way will reduce the value of the project below the cost of the land, not to mention the amount spent on improvements. They won’t start construction on the parcels that are undeveloped, the land is more valuable that way and they take less of a loss.
$800K per unit for the high rise may sound high, but that’s the about par for so cal hi rise apts, which is what i’m sure lennar’s comps are erroneously based off of. I think it’s very likely that a high end apartment REIT is going to come to town and take a gamble on the project. I’m not saying that they will be successful, i’m just prediciting that this is whats going to happen.
Also, I heard one of the tower’s at The Plaza is going apt as well. Wonder what will happen to skyline in santa ana. That project has got to be a complete disaster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 08:53 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 68 ]
|
|
|
IAC Rental
Total Posts: 157
Joined 2007-10-02
|
O / A does not ring a bell.
As for EQR or any other reit buying, I doubt it. Right now the reit’s are primarily on the sidelines do to the decline in their stock. A couple of them are shopping around (udr and aimco) but that is only because they have exchange dollars from exiting some other slow growth markets.
At $800K per unit astoria is about a 3% cap. If you have to buy it empty, lease it up, deal with the empty and half built CPW as the front door to your property for years, you better be getting more like a 6% cap. Somebody might pay a 5%. And you have to factor in all of the lease up cost, negative cash flow, etc.
Plus for 240 units at $800K per, that is almost a $200 million deal. There just aren’t any buyers looking to deals that size right now….too much risk. Maybe $500K per unit.
High rise construction doesn’t pencil in OC for apartments because the rents just aren’t there to support it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 09:12 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 69 ]
|
|
|
Condo
Total Posts: 307
Joined 2008-01-21
|
Well, I don’t understand how one can come up with your cap rates that one could have any confidence in seeing as there is no comparable product in OC. I’m not saying that $800K is the number, but I think it could be somewhere in that area. Here’s why, this high rise could be seen as a niche market or a monopoly on the for rent high rise market in OC. Obviously, no body is going to build any more of these high rises and the four that have been built were sold as condos. We’ve got Astoria, 3000 The Plaza, and Skyline as the remaining tower product in oc, that’s about 700 units that could possibly go for rent?
Again, i’m not saying this is what i believe, this is what I think a market report is going to tell you that 1) there is no for rent hi rise in the OC 2) no for rent hi rise will be built for many years or ever in the OC 3) OC still is a wealthy market full of jobs
I agree, equity is tight, we all know it is, but this is a high profile project. There might be a sovereign fund out there willing to make a gamble worth 0.001% of their total equity. Might even be one down the street.
I’m suggesting that insitutional investors would purchase the 4 story product, sticking to their MO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 09:15 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 70 ]
|
|
|
Custom Estate
Total Posts: 2025
Joined 2007-01-19
|
Joe,
nice detail. I was kinda thinking that you’d have to be at a minimum of 5% cap rate to get it though the banks (BUT you’d have to streamline your staff and management for cost issues). Plus 200M is an awfully big risk in real estate right now and 240 units is just too small for such a big cost.. You’d need at least 30-50% more units to make that cost palatable to any sort of REIT (at least a liquid one and one in the market and one willing to take a risk AND….).
As it is you probably won’t see a profit from this until 5-7 years and even then its going to be reaching for pennies to get it done.
Oh well, just a few of my old ideas.
-bix
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 09:45 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 71 ]
|
|
|
IAC Rental
Total Posts: 157
Joined 2007-10-02
|
Caraway….OK, I will give you that a sovereign fund may come in and do something unusual. I guess I am commenting based on the traditional US based institutional investment world…..which have been the only buyers in the last several years. Certainly the world is changing.
I have not seen any sovereign funds come in to the local commercial RE market yet, but I wouldn’t be shocked to see it happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 09:50 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 72 ]
|
|
|
Condo
Total Posts: 307
Joined 2008-01-21
|
But don’t get me wrong, even I still think it’s a long shot and that a responsible, educated rational investor shouldn’t offer more than 500K a door.
Well, maybe not a true commercial RE market, but a soverign fund did purchase john laing homes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 10:33 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 73 ]
|
|
|
IAC Rental
Total Posts: 157
Joined 2007-10-02
|
Bix,
Financing an empty building would be extremely difficult. It would likely have to be sold to an institutional investor who was willing to just pay all cash. They could finance it after they completed the lease up.
They could try to get some type of interim bridge financing to cover the lease up, but the magnitude of negative cash flow and corresponding interest reserve would be so large that it would torpedo the economics of the deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 10:45 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 74 ]
|
|
|
Custom Estate
Total Posts: 2208
Joined 2007-08-08
|
After reading all the posts on this thread, I am astounded that these things got built at all. Had the bubble not burst, it still seems unlikely that these high rise projects would ever be a success in Irvine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: 24 March 2008 11:24 AM |
[ Ignore ]
[ # 75 ]
|
|
|
IAC Rental
Total Posts: 157
Joined 2007-10-02
|
Nude,
At bubble inflated pricing they worked all day long…..Bosa made a bunch of money on their first 2 towers…i think Opus made a bunch of money on their first two Plaza towers.
The developers thought the bubble pricing was here to stay. It didn’t help that Bosa let investors buy multiple units at Marquee. The activity at Marquee gave the rest of the developer market a sign that there was a big market for high rise in OC. It was obviously a false signal.
|
|
|
|
|