Category Archives: Real Estate Owned

The FHA Will Fail Like Subprime

The FHA has stepped in to the role subprime lenders used to fill in our housing market. Will the FHA suffer the same fate?

708 LARKRIDGE Irvine, CA 92618 inside

Irvine Home Address … 708 LARKRIDGE Irvine, CA 92618
Resale Home Price …… $286,000

{book1}

A court is in session, a verdict is in Debtor’s Prison 4
No appeal on the docket today
Just my own sin
The walls are cold and pale
The cage made of steel
Screams fill the room
Alone I drop and kneel
Silence now the sound
My breath the only motion around
Demons cluttering around
My face showing no emotion
Shackled by my sentence
Expecting no return
Here there is no penance
My skin begins to burn

My Own Prison — Creed

Underwater homeowners who do not walk away are trapped in a prison of their own choosing. Our Government, the Federal Reserve and the lending oligarchs have conspired to make that choice for people and keep them in perpetual debt servitude.

One author whose voice I admire on the housing bubble is Dean Baker, Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, D.C. He has written a great piece titled, FHA Troubles Are Likely to Curtail Demand, that is the focus of today’s post.

Most modification plans leave homeowners without equity and paying excessive housing costs.

The Federal Housing Authority has been taking steps over the last month to tighten its standards on the loans it guarantees, most notably by dropping several initiators who have had especially bad track records. While this is a necessary and appropriate step given its financial situation, tighter standards from the FHA will have a dampening impact on the housing market in the coming year.

Remarkably, little attention has been given to the extent to which the FHA filled the gap created by the collapse of the subprime market. At the peak of the bubble in 2006, subprime mortgages accounted for almost a quarter of all mortgages. This share fell to near zero in subsequent years. The FHA, which had been marginalized by the explosion of subprime, saw its share increase from less than 3 percent of the market in 2006 to 23 percent this year. In a context of falling house prices and double-digit unemployment, this rapid expansion virtually guaranteed that the FHA would face problems.

Now that the FHA is tightening up, its market share will presumably fall back towards its historic level in the 8-10 percent range. While some FHA borrowers will be able to find other loans, many will not. If the FHA market share drops by 10 percentage points and half of the would-be FHA borrowers cannot find mortgages elsewhere, this implies a drop in demand of 5 percent, or more than 250,000 potential buyers. This will have a substantial impact on the housing market.

Subprime crowded out FHA during the bubble. FHA fell from
its historic norm of 8%-10% of the market to being only 3%. Why go
through the brain damage of FHA (the application process is rigorous)
when the application process for subprime was nil?

Now that subprime
has imploded, FHA has filled in as the only lender willing to accept less than 20% down, so their market share has gone up to replace subprime. Can low downpayment programs prop up a falling real estate market?

Monthly Percentage Change of Owners’ Equivalent Rent, 2000-2009

The continuing decline in nominal rents is making it ever more apparent that the main beneficiaries of mortgage modification programs are likely to be banks. Under some of the proposals being discussed, the government would pay up to $50,000 to keep homeowners in their homes. In the vast majority of these situations, even after a loan has been modified, homeowners will be paying considerably more on their mortgage and other ownership costs than they would to rent the same home. In the markets that were most inflated by the bubble, this difference can be well over $1,000 a month. In other words, each month that the government keeps the family in their home as a homeowner is a further drain on their income and savings.

This is what I have been saying here at the IHB for years. To me, the most obvious sign of the bubble was paying a premium for ownership. When rents are less than the cost of ownership, appreciation is required to compensate for the additional cost. Once appreciation goes away, it is crazy to pay more to own than to rent. As many have pointed out, rents are falling, and cashflow values fall along with them. This trend will continue until the recession is over locally.

Back to the post:

Also, in the vast majority of cases, homes are sufficiently underwater such that there is no reasonable prospect that the homeowner will ever build up equity in their home. It seems that many policymakers even now have not come to the grips with the housing bubble. They fail to recognize that the surge in house prices from 1996 to 2006 was a one-time blip that is now in the process of being corrected. There is no more reason to expect that house prices will rise back to bubble-inflated levels than there is to believe that the NASDAQ will return to the peaks of the Internet bubble in 2000. As a result, most of the homeowners who receive modifications are likely to find that they either have to bring cash to a closing, arrange a short sale, or default at some future date.

If mortgage modifications cause homeowners to pay more money for housing for each month they stay in their home and still leave them with no equity when they sell their home, it is difficult to see how this policy helps homeowners. The money that the government pays out is going to banks and other lenders, allowing them to collect much more money on their loans than would likely be the case without modifications. Unlike the TARP funds, which were loans that had to be repaid with interest, the money that the government pays in modifications is simply given to banks.

Policymakers who are interested in helping homeowners facing foreclosure must focus on developing policies that either ensure that homeowners will be paying comparable amounts to the rent on a similar unit and/or that they will actually have equity in their home at the point where they sell it. A policy that both raises monthly housing costs and leaves homeowners with no reasonable prospect of accruing equity is not helping homeowners.

The only reason people are not pissed off about loan modification programs is because they still believe houses will be back at peak values in a couple of years. There are many people who are trying to stay in houses that are dramatically underwater because they believe the rate of appreciation they witnessed during the bubble will return soon. With the direct and unprecedented manipulation of mortgage interest rates by the Federal Reserve, many homedebtors believe the Government has their back when in reality, the Government is bending them over.

I am of the opinion that the FHA is going to be forced to tighten lending standards and increase downpayment requirements because if they don’t the FHA will lose money just like subprime, and the US taxpayer will finally call an end to the madness — years later, some bean counter will produce a report claiming the FHA made money while stabilizing the market; the report will be bullshit.

The road ahead is clearly through the FHA. Stabilizing the bottom of the market is a foundational step. After we reach the bottom, those that purchased will gain equity and begin the chain of move-ups that signifies a healthy real estate market. We are many years from that level of market stability.

708 LARKRIDGE Irvine, CA 92618 inside

Irvine Home Address … 708 LARKRIDGE Irvine, CA 92618

Resale Home Price … $286,000 https://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/debtors_prison_1.jpg
Income Requirement ……. $59,760
Downpayment Needed … $10,010
3.5% Down FHA Financing

Home Purchase Price … $410,000
Home Purchase Date …. 7/29/2005

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(141,160)
Percent Change ………. -30.2%
Annual Appreciation … -7.9%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.08%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $1,495
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $2,080
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $1,690

Property Details for 708 LARKRIDGE Irvine, CA 92618

Beds 1https://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mozilojail.jpg
Baths 1 full 1 part baths
Size 868 sq ft
($329 / sq ft)
Lot Size n/a
Year Built 1999
Days on Market 6
Listing Updated 12/14/2009
MLS Number S598717
Property Type Condominium, Townhouse, Residential
Community Oak Creek
Tract Oakp

According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.

Elegant townhome in the highly sought-after and gated Oak Creek community featuring a spacious master suite, one & one-half baths, sun-splashed patio & direct-access two car garage with custom storage cabinets. Large living & dining room with recessed lighting and sliding glass door access to balcony. Beautiful designer upgrades include hardwood floors, custom paint, plantation shutters and custom baseboards! Gourtmet kitchen, opens up to the living room, boasting honey-maple cabinetry, built in microwave, pantry and recessed lighting. Spacious master suite with walk-in closet and master bath with dual sinks. Just steps to resort-style pools, spas, fitness center, tennis, basketball, volleyball, award-winning schools and Oak Creek Village Center with Gelson’s Market and upscale shops & restaurants.

Maximizing Home Ownership

It is long-standing government policy to maximize home ownership, but is that really a good idea?

30 GRAY DOVE   Irvine, CA 92618  front 2

Irvine Home Address … 30 GRAY DOVE Irvine, CA 92618
Resale Home Price …… $909,000

{book1}

Here comes the action
Here comes at last
Lord give me reaction
Lord give me your chance

You should follow me down
In satellite towns
There’s no colour and no sound
I’ve been ten feet underground

I gotta get out of this satellite town

Black and White Town — Doves

I don’t know who the blogger is over at Finance My Money, but the posts are excellent. Below is an exerpt from Housing’s Treacherous Path: From 44 Percent
Homeownership to 70 Percent. The Levittown Dream and Nothing Down
Madness. How a Nation lost its way with Homeownership
.

The cookie cutter planned community madness started with Levittown
after World War II. These towns were built in communities in New York,
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Puerto Rico. The communities were built
with speed and efficiency. It is interesting that the communities
started out as rental units and within two days 2,000 units had been
rented. With demand surging the properties were then sold as purchase
units with the help of the Federal Housing Administration (more on them
later).

Levittown is now used in a derogatory sense to highlight massive
cookie cutter suburbia. Many people in these communities actually
enjoyed their towns but critics were everywhere. Yet we went from
Levittowns to McMansion Villages with the twist that homes were bigger
for ever smaller families. Once the credit markets were freed from any
shackles by deregulation banks pushed the limits on the borrowing
population. That is how places like California saw home prices triple in less than a decade.

The problem with believing that homeownership is part of the
American Dream is that it misses the fundamental economic question. By
labeling something a dream it makes it harder to confront with factual
data. This reminds me of the parents that let their kids audition for
American Idol even though they sound like a cat in heat. Many people
should not be homeowners and that is okay. Yet politically this must
be like kryptonite because who in the world is going to want to pop
that dream? Can you imagine being labeled the anti-homeownership
candidate?

This insistence on allowing the homeownership dream to permeate the
country has pushed the homeownership rate to unsupportable levels:

home-ownership-rates

Now during the Great Depression homeownership dropped to 44
percent. It is also the case that during this time many loans were
also based on 5 year balloons which made it hard for many to borrow,
especially in the bank failing environment of the depression. Yet
after that bump, homeownership increased from 1941 all the way to our
housing peak in 2005 reaching a peak near 70 percent. Yet very few
even bothered to ask if this was even good for our economy? Clearly it
wasn’t.

{book4}

I discussed this issue in The Great Housing Bubble:

Before a policy can be formulated, there needs to be an open
discussion of the goal of maximizing home ownership. Owning a home has
become synonymous with the American Dream. Every Presidential
administration has had the expansion of home ownership as one of its
goals. The tax code is structured to give tax breaks to home owners to
encourage home ownership. The idea of home ownership is deeply embedded
in our culture.

Managing the rate of home ownership is analogous to managing the
rate of economic growth. It is not the policy of our government or the
Federal Reserve to maximize economic growth. Instead, the Federal
Reserve balances economic growth with inflation and tries to manage
economic growth to keep it on a sustainable path. This policy grew out
of our painful history of economic cycles of boom and bust. It was
realized that economic growth must be tempered to a sustainable level
to minimize the damage of economic downturns. Similarly, the rate of
home ownership should not be maximized. Home ownership will never reach
100%, and this should not be the goal of housing policy. Just as
economic growth is tempered by the rate of inflation, home ownership
rates are tempered by the rate of default of mortgage loan programs.

The harsh reality is that a certain percentage of the population
lacks the desire, discipline or responsibility requisite to be a
homeowner. There is a percentage of the population who do not want to
be homeowners. Many people require mobility to pursue career
opportunities or other goals. Some people like the freedom of renting
and do not want the responsibilities of home ownership that go beyond
monthly payments. There are some people who simply do not make housing
payments consistently. This group is not capable of sustaining home
ownership. There may be opportunities for policy initiatives to
increase education to make this group smaller, but there will always be
some people who cannot or will not do what is necessary to keep a
house: make their payments. There is a percentage of the general
population who should be renters.

There is a natural, sustainable level of home ownership. Home
ownership rates in the United States increased markedly at the end of
World War Two as the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage became the commonly
accepted vehicle of home finance. In the 60 years that followed, home
ownership rates stabilized between 60% and 65% through good economic
times and recessions and interest rates ranging from below 6% to above
18%. Subprime lending demonstrated that increasing the home ownership
rate through the widespread use of lending programs with high default
rates is inherently unstable. Managing the home ownership rate is not a
subject of governmental policy. Any legislative initiative to
specifically limit home ownership rates would be politically
unpalatable; however, either a market-based initiative or a legislative
initiative that prevents the widespread use of loan programs subject to
high rates of default rates would effectively manage the home ownership
rate and prevent painful declines in that rate. Home ownership rates
decline as homeowners become renters, a painful process known as
foreclosure.

Do you think we should be using the GSEs to put people into homes when they can’t sustain ownership? That is what we are doing.

30 GRAY DOVE   Irvine, CA 92618  front 2

Irvine Home Address … 30 GRAY DOVE Irvine, CA 92618

Resale Home Price … $909,000

Income Requirement ……. $188,432
Downpayment Needed … $181,800
20% Down Conventional

Home Purchase Price … $1,215,500
Home Purchase Date …. 12/13/2006

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(361,040)
Percent Change ………. -25.2%
Annual Appreciation … -9.6%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.01%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $3,908
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $5,630
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $4,350

Property Details for 30 GRAY DOVE Irvine, CA 92618

Beds 3
Baths 4 baths
Size 2,717 sq ft
($335 / sq ft)
Lot Size 4,481 sq ft
Year Built 2006
Days on Market 1
Listing Updated 12/11/2009
MLS Number P713959
Property Type Single Family, Residential
Community Portola Springs
Tract Lasc

According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.

Portola Springs beauty! Three bedrooms upstairs- each with their own attached bath! Downstairs comes with charming court yard and living area- kitchen boasts stainless steel appliances, and granite countertops. Come see this one this weekens as it won’t last!

There are a few IHB readers who have told me they looked at properties over $1,000,000 in Portola Springs in early 2007 and after reading the blog, they decided to wait. Today’s featured property puts those families about $350,000 ahead of the purchaser of today’s featured property. Based on the purchase date, my early analysis posts came out two months too late. Sorry.

This property was purchased for $1,215,500 on 12/13/2006. The owner used a $972,160 first mortgage, a $121,520 HELOC and a $121,820 downpayment. The downpayment may explain why he held on so long…

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 09/18/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 06/12/2009
Document Type: Notice of Default

The lender, US Bank National Association, bought the property back for $887,826 on 11/12/2009.

Irvine Housing Blog No Kool Aid

I hope you have enjoyed this week, and thank you for reading the Irvine Housing Blog: astutely observing
the Irvine home market and combating California Kool-Aid since
September 2006.

Have a great weekend,

Irvine Renter

Deep Peace

The Lakes in Northwood is ground-zero for Irvine foreclosures. Despite the beating prices in this old condo development are taking, the design of the property and grounds is quite good.

43 LAKEPINES Irvine, CA 92620 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 43 LAKEPINES Irvine, CA 92620
Resale Home Price …… $349,900

{book1}

Deep peace
Of a running wave to you
Deep peace
Of the flowing air to you
Deep peace
Of the quiet earth to you
Deep peace
Of the shining stars to you
Deep peace
Of the gentle night to you
Moon and stars
Pour their healing light on you
Deep peace to you

Deep Peace — Bill Douglas

Some people want a property in the middle of the action, and some people want a property where they can relax and be at peace. The challenge for designers of exterior spaces is creating places of beauty with limited space and and it harmony with what are often undesirable buildings. The more urban a setting is, the more difficult the task becomes.

The Lakes is an old condo development, but the designers did try to make a good land plan with nice exterior spaces. Contrast this development with most garden-style apartment complexes with straight lines of buildings surrounded by a sea of parking. Having designed many of these myself, I can tell you that developers operate by arranging parking, access roads and building footprints to obtain maximum density. If there happens to be any irregular triangular spaces (there always is), the land plan is considered inefficient, and special care must be taken to wring out every available square inch for development purposes, within constraints set forth by the approving body.

The Lakes Irvine California

The land plan of The Lakes (above) at first glance looks like a chaos of poorly arranged buildings. Couldn’t they have straightened out the buildings at the top? Isn’t there a more efficient way to arrange those awkward buildings in the middle? The answer to both is “yes,” but the real issue is how does it feel on the ground. By breaking up long lines of building edges (like the ugliness along Irvine Boulevard on the lower left) the experience on the ground is much improved.

The Lakes Irvine California birds eye

If you look at the arrangement of buildings and the resulting greenspaces, you see ample room for pools and other water features. Also, the additional spacing between units gives a greater sense of privacy that encourages people to actually use the spaces they are provided. When you look at the exterior space pictured in the listing, it looks like a nice location to sit and enjoy the beautiful surroundings.

Perhaps the beauty of these grounds will comfort the underwater homedebtors there; perhaps not.

43 LAKEPINES Irvine, CA 92620 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 43 LAKEPINES Irvine, CA 92620

Resale Home Price … $349,900

Income Requirement ……. $72,121
Downpayment Needed … $12,247
3.5% Down FHA Financing

Home Purchase Price … $436,000
Home Purchase Date …. 3/7/2006

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(107,094)
Percent Change ………. -19.7%
Annual Appreciation … -5.8%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 4.96%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $1,804
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $2,430
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $1,740

Property Details for 43 LAKEPINES Irvine, CA 92620

Beds 2
Baths 1 full 2 part baths
Size 1,204 sq ft
($291 / sq ft)
Lot Size n/a
Year Built 1977
Days on Market 4
Listing Updated 11/30/2009
MLS Number S597487
Property Type Condominium, Residential
Community Northwood
Tract Lk

According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.

Turkey

Great Bank Owned Condo located in desirable Northwood Location in Irvine. Unit has a back patio off the stream that runs through complex, allowing you to sit and relax. The unit also features custom ceramic tile flooring downstairs, living room with fireplace, recessed lighting, white appliances including refrigerator-washer-dryer, white tile on kitchen counters, 6-panel doors, carpet upstairs, 2 bedrooms stairs with 1.75 bathrooms upstairs, 1/2 bath downstairs, unit appears to have been painted recently… Good condition, turn key, ready to move in. The unit is also located close to Northwood High School, shopping, dining and entertainment. The complex includes 2 pools, tennis facilities, stream running throughout.

One of the interesting features of this property is the owner, the FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION. The GSEs do not have much exposure to Irvine because much of it was financed at amounts much larger than the conforming limit.

The owner refinanced this property on 04/03/2007 for $364,000. As you may recall, the GSEs were not responsible for the housing bubble, and their late entry into subprime mortgages and the lowering of lending standards was a response to the loss of market share they experienced when CDOs took over. This loan was one of those stupid ones they bought in reaction to the runaway market of the bubble. Now is when they pay for their mistakes — or to be more accurate — we will pay for their mistakes.

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 10/05/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 06/30/2009
Document Type: Notice of Default

Most of the loss is being absorbed by the owner and the second mortgage. The owner put about $45,000 down, and there was a second for about that much; the remainder will be covered by the US Taxpayer.

Black Friday

Is everyone out shopping today? Our retailers certainly hope so.

120 TALMADGE Irvine, CA 92602 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 120 TALMADGE Irvine, CA 92602
Resale Home Price …… $421,900

{book1}

When Black Friday comes
I’ll stand down by the door
And catch the grey men when they
Dive from the fourteenth floor
When Black Friday comes
I’ll collect everything I’m owed
And before my friends find out
I’ll be on the road

Black Friday — Steely Dan

The news headlines with green shoots sprouting from Government bullshit indicates retailers are hoping this season will be better. Wishful thinking is not a great business plan, or so I have read.

Pinched us Retailers Started Their Black Friday on Thursday

Black Friday may top last year’s Washington Post

120 TALMADGE Irvine, CA 92602 kitchen

Irvine Home Address … 120 TALMADGE Irvine, CA 92602

Resale Home Price … $421,900

Income Requirement ……. $87,359
Downpayment Needed … $84,380
20% Down Conventional

Home Purchase Price … $645,000
Home Purchase Date …. 9/22/2005

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(248,414)
Percent Change ………. -34.6%
Annual Appreciation … -9.9%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.00%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $1,812
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $2,620
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $2,150

Property Details for 120 TALMADGE Irvine, CA 92602

Beds 2
Baths 2 baths
Size 1,479 sq ft
($285 / sq ft)
Lot Size n/a
Year Built 2002
Days on Market 3
Listing Updated 11/17/2009
MLS Number S596312
Property Type Condominium, Residential
Community Northpark
Tract Aubr

According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.

BEAUTIFULLY UPGRADED HOME IN THE PRESTIGIOUS, GUARD-GATED COMMUNITY OF NORTHPARK! HIGH CEILINGS W/ LOTS OF WINDOWS. OPEN FLOOR PLAN W/ PLENTY OF SUNLIGHT. DESIGNER PLUSH CARPET & CUSTOM PAINT THROUGHOUT. GOURMET KITCHEN FEATURES GRANITE TITLE COUNTERTOPS, BREAKFAST BAR, & LOTS OF CABINET SPACE. PRIVATE OVERSIZED MASTER BEDROOM OFFERS VERY GENEROUS CLOSET. LARGE SECOND BEDROOM W FULL-SIZE BATHROOM. OPEN LOFT CAN BE USED AS A LIBRARY OR OFFICE. BALCONY GREAT FOR ENTERTAINING. LAUNDRY ROOM ON MAIN FLOOR. PLENTY OF STORAGE SPACE IN 2 CAR TANDEM GARAGE. QUIET INTERIOR LOCATION, WALKING DISTANCE TO POOLS, SPAS, BBQS, CLUB HOUSE, SPORTS COURTS, TENNIS, TOT LOTS, WALKING TRAILS & MORE. EASY ACCESS TO SHOPPING, DINING, ENTERTAINMENT & FREEWAYS. COME & MAKE THIS YOUR PERFECT HOME!

ALL CAP

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 09/01/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 07/10/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 03/17/2009
Document Type: Notice of Default

At least this one was processed quickly….

Irvine Housing Blog No Kool Aid

I hope you have enjoyed this week, and thank you for reading the Irvine Housing Blog: astutely observing
the Irvine home market and combating California Kool-Aid since
September 2006.

Have a great weekend,

Irvine Renter

🙂

California Kool Aid

The belief in rapid home price appreciation is deeply held in California. Now with HELOCs to give access to this pot of gold, California Kool Aid has never tasted better.

108 TIMBERWOOD Irvine, CA 92620 front 2

Irvine Home Address … 108 TIMBERWOOD Irvine, CA 92620
Resale Home Price …… $399,000

{book1}

Now you know it’s a meaningless question
To ask if those stories are right
‘Cause what matters most is the feeling
You get when you’re hypnotized

Seems like a dream
(They) got me hypnotized

Hypnotized — Fleetwood Mac

The belief in endless rapid appreciation took hold in the 1970s, and like a persistent disease of faith, it hypnotizes its victims with dreams of limitless wealth and spending power. Will the cycle ever end? Or will a few months of rising prices make kool aid as tasty again?

During the bubble, people borrowed their appreciation and spent it. The lenders and investors in mortgage-backed securities have absorbed most of these losses; therefore, we have a large population that was hugely rewarded when prices went up that has been spared the consequences of their stupidity. In my opinion, this moral hazard has made California Kool Aid more addicting. What incentive does our current system have in favor of prudence and responsibility?

108 TIMBERWOOD Irvine, CA 92620 front 2

Irvine Home Address … 108 TIMBERWOOD Irvine, CA 92620

Resale Home Price … $399,000

Income Requirement ……. $73,940
Downpayment Needed … $79,800

Home Purchase Price … $585,000
Home Purchase Date …. 2/14/2006

Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(209,940)
Percent Change ………. -31.8%
Annual Appreciation … -10.1%

Mortgage Interest Rate ………. 5.06%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $1,725
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $2,430
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $1,870

Property Details for 108 TIMBERWOOD Irvine, CA 92620

Beds 2
Baths 2 full 1 part baths
Size 1,442 sq ft
($277 / sq ft)
Lot Size n/a
Year Built 2001
Days on Market 4
Listing Updated 11/9/2009
MLS Number S595565
Property Type Condominium, Residential
Community Northwood
Tract Coll

According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.

Corner unit 2 bedroom, 2.5 bath townhome across from award winning elementary and high schools. Direct two car garage access. Wrap around front patio. HOA includes two swimming poools, tennis courts, volleyball, built in BBQs and hiking trails.

What is a poool?

This REO was originally purchased for $585,000 on 2/14/2006. The owners used a $468,000 first mortgage. The information on any second mortgages has been wiped out. Late last year, they quit paying:

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 07/09/2009
Document Type: Notice of Sale (aka Notice of Trustee’s Sale)

Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 04/02/2009
Document Type: Notice of Default

The property is for sale at 31.8% off its 2006 purchase price. Ready to restart the cycle?