Vacant Bank-Owned Properties Are Being Sold Into the Market Rally

May 26th, 2010  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by No_Such_Reality
2010-05-26 07:01 AM

There is no distressed inventory.  There is destroyed inventory, there is mangled inventory, but there are no distressed sellers.

The bank short sale process is now becoming an automated no people interaction process where the bank look at the comps from the last 6 months and sets the price.

Take it or leave it.


Prices are not going to move lower until the banks are forced to acknowledge their non-performing assets.

If a seller is distressed, frankly, IMHO, they’re a fool.  What’s to be distressed about?

Hell, I’m a fool in hind sight for not grabbing a $2 million dollar home with a liar loan and squatting for two years and ripping out an extra million in tax free refi money and moving my wife and I to a cozy little retirement in Costa Rica.  No payment were necessary.  No payments are now necessary.  It’ll be a year before the bank really gets nasty and if you spend a little to fight it or limp it along once and a while, two maybe three years seems possible.

If you own a home, why are you paying your mortgage?

No, honestly, that’s a serious question.  If you own and don’t have significant equity, why are you making payments?

Astute Observation by Perspective
2010-05-26 09:19 AM

We’re making payments despite being underwater (mortgage is probably 10-15% greater than value).

We’re still making payments because:

1) Equivalent rent, considering taxes, is probably $250-500 less;
2) Our current front-end DTI (PITI & utilities!) is less than 23% of our monthly gross household income; and
3) The amount we’re underwater (currently) represents just 35% of one year’s gross household income;

Considering the “walk option” will always be available (with no recourse as the mortgage is “purchase”), we’re choosing to hold the option.  The mortgage is fixed and fully-amortized, so the balance is declining (at a snail’s pace of course).  We have six months’ income in cash which we’re building on aggressively, but if we suffered a prolonged income disruption, it’s comforting to know that there’s a possibility we could live rent-free for a year while determining our next move.

A friend/coworker is in a similar position as us, and we discuss this topic regularly.  We’ve come up with a standard for seriously considering voluntarily walking (assuming rental parity is not completely out-of-whack).  You should probably consider voluntarily walking when the amount you’re underwater exceeds one year’s household income.  How does that sound?

Astute Observation by Stock Investor
2010-05-26 04:16 PM

“You should probably consider voluntarily walking when the amount you’re underwater exceeds one year’s household income. How does that sound?”

It sounds wrong. In other words, there are more factors to consider.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-05-26 07:15 AM

Um, this house was sold in Feb 2008, according to Redfin.  That is, the bank foreclosed on it in 2007, sold it in Feb 2008, and it’s now for sale again, apparently as a standard sale since they are asking more than they paid for it (the sold price was either $590k or $600k-the MLS and government records differ).  This is no longer a bank owned property and hasn’t been since Feb 2008.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-26 07:55 AM

You are correct. My primary data source is incorrect, and I had to consult another to pick up the 2008 sale as going to a 3rd party.

It will be a nice flip if they can sell it for asking.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-26 07:17 AM

“What are we going to do with all those homes?”

In premium areas with substantial job centers there is no problem.  It is a piece of cake to clear inventory in areas like Irvine.  Either a house is purchased with 100% cash at auction or a buyer quickly steps up with hundreds of thousands for a down payment. 

Take this house for instance.  It is priced at or below rental parity and it is only 10% off peak pricing.

The bottom 50% of housing markets with high umemplyment and too many homes have a serious problem.  The future is bleak for these areas.  Anything the government does to try to bailout these areas won’t help.  On the other hand any bailout for these areas further props up the premium areas.  Buyer incentives and low rates help premium areas while the bottom have continues to decline.

If mortgage rates fall to 4.0% this house will be at rental parity at peak pricing.

Astute Observation by Happy Not In Cali
2010-05-26 08:24 AM

Who are these cash buyers or those with hundreds of thousands for a down payment? Where do they come from? I don’t really understand what you are saying. 

Government bailouts aren’t going to help anyone in the long run I agree but I don’t see why Irvine isn’t equally fucked as every other housing market that has had a substantial run-up in prices to lax lending standards that encouraged rent-seeking behavior in home purchases.  I mean, why would Irvine is okay, but it is not fundamentally different from Bend Oregon, Riverside California, Las Vegas Nevada or even Bozeman Montana in terms of how its housing market operates.

What am I missing?

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-26 08:44 AM

IMHO what you are missing is that a ton of wealth was created during the various bubbles of the past 15 years.  This wealth flocks to premium areas.  It is the evolution of a capitalist society.  The top 20% of markets for any good do not have to react the same as the bottom 80%.  Wealth continues to flow to the top, the rich get richer and the middle class pays for it.

There is definitely no over supply of homes in Irvine.

Astute Observation by Happy Not In Cali
2010-05-26 08:56 AM

I fundamentally disagree that any wealth was created by these bubbles as that’s like saying that a lottery “creates” wealth.  What you’re talking about is that a lot of wealth was redistributed. A few winners, a lot of losers, and those few winners do not make up enough cash buyers to keep Irvine’s prices propped up at bubble levels.  It’s a national economy and what happens in Riverside is going to affect Irvine in a major way, period. I don’t see how it could be any other way.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-26 09:01 AM

Much of the wealth transferred into the Irvine housing market in the last 9 months was created in the stock market.  If the equities markets continues to fall, and I have no idea if it will, the down payments on Irvine homes will decrease dramatically.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-26 09:18 AM

What you are saying is only half true.  Some wealth was repaired over the last 9 months but even that wealth was created long before that in an earlier bubble.  It is just as easy for wealth to be created in a down market as an up market.  Even if markets correct significantly wealth is being tranfered to people with the correct foresight.

My guess is the lambs sitting long are not looking to buy in Irvine over the next year.  Those folks would be in cash equivalents.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-26 09:59 AM

What I am saying is way more thah half true, although it was a generality. 

It is not as easy for wealth to be created in a down market as an up market.  It is amazingly more difficult and very few people have the ability to make money in a bear equities market or on the short side.

And your guess is also wrong.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-26 10:11 AM

It’s also a generality but difinitely not wrong.  Current trends show that the generality is true.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-26 10:54 AM

Darn.  I was trying to yank your chain, and was unsuccessful.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2010-05-26 11:54 AM

Awgee, did these people short the market when it plunged or go long at Dow 6500?  I would imagine that most people lost money in that time period.  Trying to time the peaks and valleys is almost impossible.  And who in their right mind would gamble a housing down payment in a completely irrational, insane stock market? 

This just doesn’t add up to me.  I’m sure there are some people who made a fortune in the market the last 2 years…but that is a very small minority.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-26 12:45 PM

From those I have spoken with who purchased where I reside, many have cashed out stock holdings and they felt confident to purchase based on the increase in their portfolio.  I can not remember anybody telling me they bought at 6500 or that they had timed the market, but I imagine, like you said that you imagine, that their portfolios had gotten kicked during the downturn and they were now feeling more flush.  It does add up and it is what I have been told by those who have purchased.  I guess the folks who have told me this could be liars, but I have not reason to think so.  No one said anything about anybody making a fortune or gambling in an insane irrational stock market, nor is that a prerequisite to buying based an increase in net worth.  I think you are adding factors which are not existent in the equation.

Astute Observation by BD
2010-05-26 09:00 AM

...just an FYI on ‘rental parity’... OC rents and IRVINE rents have been declining now for 7 consecutive months.  Check the OC Register. 

B

Astute Observation by Happy Renter
2010-05-26 11:24 AM

Yep, and that’s the fallacy with Planet Realty’s assumption that rental parity has created a bottom in the prices.

Astute Observation by Happy Not In Cali
2010-05-26 09:19 AM

Another thing I’ve gotta say, even if Irvine is a premium housing market (which to me is like saying the Lexus ES 330 is a premium sedan - kinda, but not really) that doesn’t mean that the wealthy buyers are necessarily going to buy into Irvine or anywhere for that matter; they might just park the money in other investments. 

In my opinion wealth and consumption do not necessarily go hand in hand because the way rich people become rich is that they spend less than they make.  It has nothing to do with whether they spend more than the rest of the population.

Astute Observation by mikeD
2010-05-26 10:37 AM

Never under-estimate the power of a herd of asians.

Astute Observation by jimmyD
2010-05-26 01:09 PM

“Never under-estimate the power of a herd of asians. “


ESPECIALLY asian WOMEN…

Astute Observation by tonye
2010-05-26 01:51 PM

Specially when they’re driving Lexus ES 300s.  ;-D

Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-05-26 07:30 AM

I checked my credit score the other day, then wondered “Why do I bother? Does it make sense to get a loan in the future?”

I made the mistake of selling while I had equity, and moving to the rental world. Should have HELOCed the place, bought Krugerrands, enjoyed 1-2 years of rent-free living, then become a Krugerrand-laden renter. My bad.

But it occurs to me that thrift and no debt, punished though they have been during the ‘00s, might now actually pay off. Recent mortgagors now look to be debt slaves, living with a sliver of positive equity - representing a little less than the principal they have paid down minus a small amount each year in a gradually deflating market.

And the more who think as I do, the worse the deflation will be.

Seriously, it looks as if those who eschew debt may enjoy a generation of vindication, as a shrinking debt load deflates all asset classes normally purchased with debt.

I wonder if this will become a positive-feedback loop: more people shaving off their debt, causing prices to drop, causing more to conclude that debt makes no sense, and so on.

Someday this war’s gonna start!

Astute Observation by Perspective
2010-05-26 09:30 AM

Dave Ramsey’s a big proponent of not caring about your credit score (in the sense that you shouldn’t be worried about obtaining future credit because you shouldn’t borrow money).

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-26 10:16 AM

I am a big fan of Dave Ramsey. I recently purchased two of his books and two of his videos. So far, I have found very few areas of disagreement.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-26 10:52 AM

Know who he is and kinda what he says.  Don’t have any of his books.  If I wanted to read his books, I would check them out from the library. smile

I have no idea what my credit score is.

Astute Observation by avobserver
2010-05-26 10:13 AM

“Someday this war’s gonna start! “

The war already started – in a WWI meat grinder trench warfare fashion. Long drawn out and boring, with mounting casualties to the net worth of American middle class families as the only indicator that time and things are still moving forward.

Last time SoCal RE market went thru a 6-year correction largely due to a mild recession and a downsizing defense industry. This time we had a great housing bubble, a severe global recession and debt crisis that was slated to have a long lasting negative impact on private industries as well as state/local gov’t. Any one bother to guess how long this correction will last?

My guess is – to borrow a clichéd baseball analogy, right now we are probably at the end of the first inning, or maybe the beginning of the second, of the game. Scores (market is up or down 5, 10%) probably do not mean that much at this point. There have been some ups and downs, some are predictable, some are not. The only fun part is to watch people get all keyed up by various fake rallies along the way.

Astute Observation by Sue in Irvine
2010-05-26 07:34 AM

Why are there no men at the ass pool?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-26 07:49 AM

I couldn’t find a good image. How about this one?

Astute Observation by Happy Not In Cali
2010-05-26 08:42 AM

IrvineRenter FTW!  That is why there are no men in the ass pool.  It’s like dancing on the bar - ladies only, please.

Astute Observation by Irvinian
2010-05-27 01:20 PM

where is this pool located?

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-05-26 11:34 AM

Bubble are rapid transfers of weath and not creation.  Bubble transfer weath from one area to another.  LV gambling doesn’t create weath, but moves it to LV from other areas. 

Real weath creation is by inovation of new discovery to make something, make something with less resources.  Much of “inovation” is just another term for confusing people—change for change sake or change to keep the weath transfer going.

Astute Observation by Laura Louzader
2010-05-26 12:28 PM

“Real wealth creation is by innovation of new discovery to make something, make something with less resources”.

Yes, that is true, but we could add that it takes capital to apply the discovery to manufacturing something and getting it to its market.

We have many new technologies, technologies that could vastly enhance our efficiency, make use of new fuels (thorium, anyone?),and otherwise enhance our lives and render us truly productive once more, thus vastly increase our wealth. But we blew our capital and went deep into debt to sustain the unsustainable economy based on borrowing and buying ever bigger houses for ever greater multiples of income. We took the easy road of financialization and killed our industrial base. Our authorities are now asset-stripping what wealth remains to the population in order to sustain the old, fake economy based on borrowing and asset inflation, to the detriment of the new, innovative technologies that could be the foundation of a honest, productive economy.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-05-26 12:54 PM

LL,
Very ture.  The road to wealth destruction is much easier than the road to wealth creation.

American has been on the road to its wealth destruction, while the many other countries have been on the road to its wealth creation.  Capital (equipment and durable assets) and liquidity (cash and equilvents) have been wasted.  Mass education, the mind of the middle class, has also been wasted.

Astute Observation by Swiller
2010-05-27 10:04 AM

And our minds have been wasted because as a people we refuse to accept certain truths. War on Drugs…abject failure and TERRORISM on our own people, 99% of the time, the poor and uneducated.

War on Poverty…..hows that one going?

We are so warlike as a people, in the absence of an enemy, we target ourselves and make our own people enemies.

CEO pay has risen 654% while in comparison the common worker (mostly you and I) has risen a meager 1%.

They very worst thing about unrestrained capitalism is that soon very few people will control everything. You see, there HAS TO be wealth transfer, but it has to be done properly, with people working and getting a FAIR SHARE of the pie, but between the defacrats who give benefits for ZERO work, and the banana republicans who want to assure every CEO never has to even touch the earth they are created from, the system is BROKEN.

If it doesn’t get fixed, there will be people dying, and unfortunately, that usually means the poor and middle class start dying or being incarcerated. As Africa about how much intervention they get in comparison with countries rich in natural resources the new plutocracy so lusts for.

Astute Observation by Credit Debt Relief
2010-05-26 03:28 PM

I believe the banks are hesitant to foreclose on many of their properties because once they do and put them up for short sales, they can’t claim assets they have and then borrow against them.

For example, if the bank owns a mortgage on a 450k house, they can borrow against that. If they foreclose on that home and short sell it, they end up with a 250k asset to borrow against. There are a ton of individuals in San Diego for example who are months behind on payment but not about to be foreclosed upon.

Astute Observation by Ochomehunter
2010-05-26 10:16 PM

We know how current stock market rally and some of the miners such as FCX, BHP, and few others ran all the way up to their bubble levels, while there was no real commodity demand. look at how these companies are sucking tits now.

Banks cannot and will not sit on it forever. If anything, the current financial reform will restrict speculative borrowing from FED discount window for trading, this is something that banks have been doing lately to show profits. Everyone at walstreet knows the real asset value of their portfolio, its just a matter of time. Most banks are illiquid and insolvent right now. This BS cannot go on for long, reason is simple, Europe is falling apart and US is next, with no appetite for US Treassuries, let alone MBS, if FHA tightens the min. downpayment terms watch how things fall apart.

I have been patient for 6-years, now I just need to stretch another 8-months to see how it pans out.

By the way, those who play stock markets, Elliott Wave folks have issued a stark warning for US Equities, Dow Jones to be under 1000 by 2016, 6-year downtrend started this month. The reason is implosion of Euro, Dollar, and failure of big banks and sovergin debts.  Watchout. I am shorting this market and making a killing.

On to house, I plan on getting into one shortly, even if I pay a premium. I am in commercial construction and unemployment is above 40% in this industry. With no hopes for improvement, not sure if I will be employed in next 8-months. I need to have means to stay for free and eat from unemployment checks. The only way to do it is to have a home where I can squat when the time comes.

I know if I lose my job I will get kicked out of my rental place, at least home ownership will keep me in it until the excess ahead of me gets cleared first.

Astute Observation by Doomsday scenario ? Nop
2010-05-26 10:33 PM

Dow will never ever hit 1000. Why? Because all it takes is printing money and the DOW will float. The world’s economies are suffering from imbalances between consumers and producers - that’s for sure. But fundamentally, the world’s capacity to produce goods and services remains undiminished. There will definitely be winners and losers as a result of the bitter pills and fixes.

Astute Observation by WaitingToBuyByAndBy
2010-05-27 12:22 AM

Disclaimer: I’ve been out of the loop for at least 6 months, so feel free to take this with a grain of salt.

Are there not boatloads of properties currently for sale on Redfin? Are there that many foreign cash buyers and investors that can swallow all these?

If nobody else has called it yet, I’m calling the rest of 2010 the “price slide”, all downhill ‘til 2011 (based on increasing supply and decreased demand (fewer buyers).

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-27 07:04 AM

Consider: What if interest rates keep decreasing?

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-27 07:19 AM

Nobody wants to answer this question.  If they do they will talk about Japan with very little true knowledge of the Japanese bubble.  Rental parity does not exist in Tokyo.

Astute Observation by justaguy
2010-05-27 03:47 PM

ok. maybe I’m missing something on your numbers.

Purchase price of 719K = 623 in property tax and 60 for homeowner’s insurance?

Just closed escrow on a house for 170k and am paying 270 in prop tax and 60 in homeowners insurance.

Either I’m getting hosed somehow or IrvineRenter’s numbers aren’t right.

Astute Observation by property tax numbers
2010-05-27 04:55 PM

I think it’s $623 per month on a home purchased for $719,000 is a little more than 1% annually which makes sense (in California) if there are no “special assessments” AKA Mello Roos…etc. Houses older than 20 years old are likely NOT to have “special assessments”. IR usually allocates about 0.20%, or so, annually for homeowners’ insurance which should be about $120 per month on $719,000 home. Of course, insurance covers the structure not the land so it’s not a direct relationship to home’s total value (total value includes both land and structure), and thus property INSURANCE can vary. If your property is in California, then you’re likely to have “Mello Roos” assesments… It’s probably a good idea to check. Also, maybe the assessor will re-assees your property later on at the new value which is probably lower than previously.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main