Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- zovall on A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
Recent Posts
- A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
Categories
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
- $499,900 :: 84 Deermont 51, Irvine CA, 92602
Looks like another one of those “investor properties”.
The seller must have read a little too much Rich Dad Poor Dad before signing the dotted line.
Someone should do a “drive by” and leave a copy of “The Great Housing Bubble” on the doorstep.
I feel out of place for not splurging the last 8 years. Years ago I kept thinking “Where do these people get the money to buy all these expensive cars?” You’ve answered that question many times over IR.
Now I am seeing telltale signs of the reverse. My daughter’s friends in the best parts of Northpark are admitting that they may lose their house AND there cars.
I had a good laugh when I saw what “close to everythings” meant. Paying $400K for the right to own essentially a condo with a closeup view of the I-5 AND Culver is a real bargain. Yeah… right.
I heard those words many, many times from 2002 - 2006. Then I left <strike>the Dark Side</strike>California, and those words haven’t troubled me since.
I laughed out loud. Seriously!
That’s exactly how those guys made me feel.
What is amazing is how high these prices got. They have come down a lot and yet they are STILL too expensive…
Absolutely too high. $2000 rent x 120=$240k.
“Close to everything” - of course, it is right on the busy exchange of I5.
Bwahahahaha!
Ah, I love the “tenant occupys” notice. In other words, the owner is renting it out to cover some of the costs, but still figures that he can make something close to what he paid for it by selling it out from underneath the tenant. What’s sneaky is that “drive bys only” suggests that the tenant has no idea. If the poor schlub (and it’s probably the owner’s mother or other relative) is paying month-to-month, I’d be worried about the probability of being evicted…if anyone was dumb enough to pay this price.
Yes, you have to love how these FB real-estate Tycoons are too cheap to let the house sit empty while they try to sell it.
Why not add a “sold as is” clause to the description while you are at it?
Who would seriously consider buying a house based upon a “drive by”?
When the market was going up 10% per month.
“...it’s probably the owner’s mother or other relative…”
Funny you say that - A friend of mine is kicking-out her mother-in-law from her rental property. Of course, like many mini real estate moguls, it’s renting at a negative cash flow, and with the downturn, the rent’s stopped completely.
So family or not, you’ve got to go!
I imagine that is going to make for an uncomfortable Christmas gathering…
Exactly why you never want to do business with family.
There you have it folks. A house (condo) that the average Joe in the “OC” can afford. A 1200SF condo. On secend thought, with the impending bankruptcy of our state and the inevitable tax increases coming to get out of it we should probably wait till the price comes down to $299K. This place is F’d!
Where are all of the bulls who horse laughed and mockingly stated that they themselves were going to come in and snap up all of these properties if prices ever got this low?
“This low” has since moved. Now its, when it gets to $800/sf they’ll laugh and buy everything up. Of course, when it gets there, it will be $400/sf as the new buy position. (Ok, I’m over-stating it, but you get my point.)
On this property generally. NEVER EVER buy a place for your own personal use with a tenant in it unless you can see the inside. I’ve owned and managed dozens of rental units and man, some people are insane with what they do to properties. If its an investment property for you, then it probably doesn’t matter as much unless Jeffrey Dahmer is living there.
Ipoplaya? CK? 25w100k+? Bueller…? Bueller…?
I have never thought of Ipoplaya as a bull; just someone who thinks Irvine will never run out of knife catchers. I feel he, like I, thinks he is wrong.
If someone was willing to sign a half a million mortgage (+ assoc fee/Mello ?) for a 1200 sf apartment near a freeway, way inland in Irvine, we should not blame anybody for suspecting that we have enough wackos living amongst us or who want to live amongst us. What kind of mindset does one need to have to sign that mortgage ? Someone raised in Manhattan or some densely populated country ?
I just leased on a SFR in West Irvine for $2,600. Two year lease, moving in next week. I’ve always consistent that I thought Irvine would bottom out at $250/sq ft….Still think that. Nothing I have seen yet indicates otherwise, but I’m open to being wrong. There are some properties right now that are getting to price points I would consider buying, but the house we found for rent was too good a deal and too perfect a situation to pass on.
Even if we were at a bottom now (and I don’t think we are), there will be no appreciation for at least the two year period we are leasing. Worst case is we are flat to today in two years, best case we are another $100k or so lower. I’ve never been a bull, but just tried to be realistic that Irvine is not going to ever cost the same as the dirt suburbs of Phoenix.
Irvine is special, I havent heard that in a long time.
I suspect somewhere around 200 SF if not lower based on the tremendous deflation happening in the economy with job loss, stocks, credit crunch,..etc, Irvine is no different.
How are u CK. Good luck with the move, make sure the owner is not in trouble.
Thanks mmg….no trouble with the owner, we know them personally. All good. At this stage, a situation like this is about the only private party rental arrangement I’d get into. If we didn’t know these people would never go for anything but IAC. I’m pretty sure Bren is a stable landlord.
How about $225K for this?
This North Park zip code has a median income of $112,399, making it one of Irvine’s wealthier neighborhoods.
That means a median dwelling in this area should be $400K at the most, to be in line with area earnings.
But this is a sub-median dwelling for this zip. This is a starter, or empty-nester, or single person’s dwelling. $225K would not be out of line for someone making $85K a year, based on a 10% down payment and a reasonable loan-to-income ration of 2.5X income, provided the borrower is not too burdened with other debt. Highly unlikely, considering the cost of cars.
We still have a long way to drop, especially if people start wanting to pay down debt and accumulate savings. We as a nation are undergoing a profound and rapid shift back to frugality and saving, and that will drive prices down further, especially for condominiums in areas where most folks prefer single family homes.
I found a better listing photo for this property. The Redfin photo doesn’t show both sides of the street.
LOL! That combination of images really captures this listing.
Another classic…
It looks like the mainstream media is beginning to talk about the pending Option ARM implosion that has been discussed at IHB for quite some time now.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28035238/
I noticed on redfin that this property has $7k of taxes based on a $500k valuation. Assuming the property was sold for the asking price of $400k (which seems way high for 2BR but be that as it may), does $400k automatically become the new tax assessment so the new owner would get c. 20% reduction in tax? If so, I can see how California has some massive problems if it had a property tax system that never factored in that prices could go down.
Yes, $400k would become the new assessment with the new owner.
But, it gets worse. You don’t even have to sell the house. You can just ask the assessor to reassess, and they are supposed to change the tax basis to market value. Many assessors are automatically reviewing a large number of assessed values without even being asked.
A 40% drop from peak home prices won’t lead to a 40% drop in property tax revenue. Much of the assessment base is commercial and industrial, which hasn’t taken as much of a hit. A lot of properties haven’t changed hands in many years, and are still assessed far below current market. Older areas like LA and SF are in a better position than newly built areas.
The places which are the hardest hit have the highest number of recently built or recently sold homes. Think Merced, Riverside, Coachella, Santa Maria. If new homes were being built there, huge amounts of sales taxes were being collected on building materials, and now there is very little of that revenue either.
There are a few factors which help the quickly growing areas. They usually do not have a large amount of pension and retiree medical expenses which they have to pay. On average, their public sector employees are paid less than the big cities. Still, if you’re looking for municipal layoffs, look for the biggest home price drops and the biggest vacancy rates.
Prop 13 protects CA from itself. Because of Prop 13 the state can rely on a study stream of income from property taxes. The state’s biggest problem is the punitive income tax structure of 9.3% on individual income above $40k.
As goes the above-the-median income earners, so goes the CA coffers.
The State’s income tax system causes its own volatilities. It is especially sensitive to IPOs, stock options, and gains on sale of stock.
Prop 13 gives state and local government a bad downside if prices drop quickly. However, if prices recover quickly, the assessments can rise to purchase price + 2% per year trend in as little as a year. So, someone buys a house for $1 million in 2006, it’s worth 700k now. It’s assessed at $700k now. If the market price goes back to $1.1 million next year and the assessed value can go to $1.061 million in 2009.
Something similar to this happened with a lot of properties in the late 1990s. They were purchased 1987-1990, had their assessments reduced 1991-1996. Then, the assessed values were able to rise quickly 1998 onward. Most of them caught up with the purchase price + 2% trend by 2002 or 2003.
Thank you for clarifying that. I was not sure if the original purchase price was retained as the basis once it was reappraised for a lower value. It does make the virtue of buying at the bottom more important.
How about Mello Roos? Would they be a fixed amount that would not change with the value of the property? My guess is that as the value drops, the effective tax rate would go up.
Thanks in advance for your take on this.
That’s something I never really understood about this mess. If the valuation of these properties kept going up and up, where were people getting the money to pay these taxes, on top of hoa, and possibly mello-roos?
From their home equity lines of credit. The essence of a Ponzi Scheme is borrowing from Peter to pay Paul, and that is exactly what people did.
It would be interesting to find out what the tenant is paying. Anyone up to doing both them and us a favor?
I would think that even as an investment/rental property, you would absolutely need to have a good look at the inside before making a bid. All that the next tenant has to do is find some mould or whatever and claim health problems to force a major renovation and maybe some compensation and damages as well. If the current tenant gets screwed out of their security deposit along with getting booted out on a couple of weeks or days notice, they could do a lot of damage as payback.
A greast interview with Elizabeth Warren:
http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=98123372&m=98125398
From the picture, I’m a little confused, but maybe not considering the market environment, does that price include the whole block of condo’s? ha ha.
IR, sorry to say this but recently I haven’t seen any property for sale in Irvine (including this one) that is both **desirable** and **affordable** as price has actually stabilized somewhat. The more desirable ones are still asking above $300/sf and $400/sf ones are pretty easy to find.
Most of the quick sell properties are simply 1) fugly, 2) too close to freeway(s) or large road(s), 3) recently built with 3+ stories (and you need good knees for those stairs), 4) too old.
Unless I’m not looking at foreclosures, I dunno what I’m missing here.
I’m hoping you would profile SFHs built in the 90s with few years left of Mello Roos that have the above criteria mentioned in the first paragraph. Suffice to say that we may have hit bottom if you can’t even find those profiles.
Today I received a brochure from Serra at Portola Springs. The front cover says, “The nesting instinct HAS FLOURISHED in Irvine for years…” (the all caps are there) Then you open it and the brochure says, “Give in today to the IMPULSE FOR LUXURY” WTF???? A luxury home is an impulse purchase? Maybe in 2006 when the $$$$$ was flowing, but not today!! Then, just to further my hysterics, at the bottom it says
“Birds of a feather flock to the
HILLS OF PORTOLA SPRINGS
I found it hilarious, and just had to share. Have a great weekend!
I’m going to “drive by” and drop a note on this guys door to tell him he’s about to be evicted.
oo bad it’s not in the lausd like this jewel at over $880/sq. ft.:
http://listings.listhub.net/pages/SOCALMLS/F1792521/?channel=zillow
many bagholders
desperate for a bailout
will not find a one
-
enclosed in a cell
each one a personal hell
thought they would be rich