School of Hard Knocks on Scholarship, Jamboree Corridor, Irvine

Jun 11th, 2009   by IrvineRenter  in

The school of hard knocks is a costly way to learn about real estate markets. The owners of today’s featured property are learning a very hard lesson as their property has lost 39% of its resale value in just over two years.

5053 SCHOLARSHIP outside 5053 SCHOLARSHIP inside

Asking Price: $550,000

Address: 5053 Scholarship, Irvine, CA 92612

Schools Out For Summer—Alice Cooper

School’s out for summer
School’s out forever
School’s been blown to pieces

I have been educating people on the workings of residential real estate since I began writing for the IHB more than two years ago. Two of the concepts I focus on are the cashflow valuation of property as its fundamental value and the price appreciation due to irrational exuberance. Any readers who have absorbed these concepts have a framework for understanding the rise and fall of home prices, and they have a reasonable approximation on price levels where the market will stabilize. This is a significant financial advantage of those who speculate and randomly guess where house prices will go next.

Many people who purchased during the bubble had little or no understanding of real estate markets (despite their beliefs to the contrary). Many of the clueless masses are learning very painful lessons from the school of hard knocks. Today’s featured property is one such learning experience.

IHB Party 6-30-2009 at JT Schmids at the District

5053 SCHOLARSHIP outside 5053 SCHOLARSHIP inside

Asking Price: $550,000

Income Requirement: $137,500

Downpayment Needed: $110,600

Purchase Price: $902,000

Purchase Date: 5/15/2007

Address: 5053 Scholarship, Irvine, CA 92612

Beds: 2
Baths: 3
Sq. Ft.: 1,430
$/Sq. Ft.: $385
Lot Size: -
Property Type: Condominium
Style: Hi-Rise/Mid-Rise Condominimum, Modern/Hi-Tech
Stories: 1
Floor: 5
View: Canyon, City Lights, City, Hills, Mountain
Year Built: 2007
Community: Airport Area
County: Orange
MLS#: S577049
Source: SoCalMLS
Status: Active
On Redfin: 1 day

lite-brite

WOW!! HIGHLY UPGRADED LUXURIOUS CONDO. EAST SOUTH SIDE, VERY LIGHT
& BRIGHT. SPACIOUS 2BED W/ VIEW & 2.5 BATH. REMOTE CONTROLLED
ALL WINDOW SHADE. UPGRADED LIGHTINING SYSTEM.GORGEOUS HARDWOOD
FLOOR.ALL GRANITE COUNTER TOPS.BUILT-IN WINE REFREGERATOR.GORGEOUS
ITALIAN CABINETS.MORE MORE!!! A PLUS PLUS.

WOW!! ALL CAPS AND MULTIPLE EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!

A PLUS PLUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS MINUS

This property was purchased on 5/15/2007 for $902,000. The owners used a $725,000 first mortgage and a $177,000 downpayment. The owners opened a HELOC for $87,700 a few months later. For their sake, I hope they maxed it out.

In the two years that have passed since they made this investment, they have lost every penney they put into the deal and their credit is trashed. All this in only two years; that is a hard knock.

You can just imagine the sale back in 2007, the buyers thought they were savvy real estate investors poised to make a fortune in the new OC high rise. It hasn’t exactly turned out as planned.

Some may look at this and think, “it was the market,” as if there were no indications that this investment might not turn out well. Many people foolishly buy into the narrative without doing the math. They buy a load of bullshit about real estate always goes up, or buying into these new towers where all the foreign investors will buy them later at inflated prices, or any of the fantasies of speculation on appreciation. Narrative does not measure value, it measures gullibility.

Buy the math, not the mythology.


home property listings

IHB Fundamental Value Report


real estate home sales

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by Observer
2009-06-11 04:46 AM

And only $1000 a month association fees? What a deal! Plus no pictures of the actual condo, just photos of the common areas. The condo itself must be too beautiful to show online…

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2009-06-11 07:44 AM

I’m completely amazed people are willing to pay over a grand a month in HOA fees.  That’s more than my complete monthly costs (payment+insurance+taxes) on my house in Riverside.  A grand a month is like making a payment on a $200,000 loan.

Astute Observation by Illuminatus
2009-06-11 05:46 AM

Almost every one of the descriptions you post has typos.  I’m just amazed that there’s so little interest in not looking like they dropped out of high school.  This one has an interesting one though:  UPGRADED LIGHTINING SYSTEM.  While “lightning” (the bolts in the sky) is one thing, and “lighting” (lamps, wall/ceiling lights, etc.) a very different thing, did they mean to say that they have an upgraded system for combating the hazards of lightning, or just some HoPo track lighting installed?

Thanks for keeping up the great posts IR - it is my daily “reality check.”  Being in coastal CA, everyone here says things are fine (given the continued WTF listings in my area).  Yesterday, though, I saw signs that the facade may be cracking.  At the edge of Fashion Island, just north of Macarthur and PCH (off Avocado), there is a shopping center with a Bristol Farms, Sur La Table, Peet’s, etc.  Lots of high end shops.  Well, two stores have FOR LEASE signs in their windows, and they are right next door to one another: Amadeus Spa and Salon, and Waterworks.  I guess the nouveau riche are having to tighten up a bit on the spa services and high end bath fixtures a bit, while trying to keep up the illusion that their houses are still worth what they paid and more, etc.  I tell you, the signs are there - the pain is coming to the high end very soon, whether they like it or not.

Astute Observation by Jonathan
2009-06-11 06:58 AM

You were not in Irvine.  That shopping center you describe is the Corona Del Mar plaza in Newport Beach.

Astute Observation by Illuminatus
2009-06-11 07:13 AM

Never said I was in Irvine - Newport is right next door.  Never mentioned Irvine in fact!

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2009-06-11 10:17 AM

Newport is different.

It’s worse there.

Astute Observation by movingaround
2009-06-11 08:15 AM

check out how many homes are for sale in newport beach on redfin - I did the same search I do for Irvine (3 bed, etc) in Newport and it was about double the number of homes for sale.  I think concern is starting to set in on the beach…

Astute Observation by ockurt
2009-06-11 09:14 AM

Folks in NB are probably only concerned if they really have to sell…if they get their WTF price then fine, if not oh well…they’ll just wait it out.

Astute Observation by Eat that!
2009-06-11 09:43 AM

Isn’t that the same thing they said about Irvine?

Astute Observation by ockurt
2009-06-11 09:09 AM

The shopping center right next to us on Newport Coast Drive/San Joaquin Hills has a few vacant stores.  The restaurants seem to be doing OK (for now) but like you mentioned, I think specialty high-end stores are the ones suffering.

The rents in these places must be astronomical so unless you’re doing a lot of volume you ain’t gonna survive.

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2009-06-11 09:56 AM

Still a long, long line ou the door at Sprinkles though smile

Astute Observation by Illuminatus
2009-06-11 10:59 AM

High school girls buying cupcakes for end-of-year stuff isn’t going to support the economy, but they ARE good!

Astute Observation by AVRenter
2009-06-11 10:32 AM

Speaking of poor intelligence spelling, I saw this gem this morning. 

”...& a tantum 3-car garage.

I’m guessing that’s where the children are sent when their tempers run amok.


http://www.redfin.com/CA/Aliso-Viejo/26-Sunswept-Mesa-92656/home/5773484

Astute Observation by zubs
2009-06-11 11:32 AM

You know, the upgraded lightning system makes this place worth 900,000.  You can play Zeus and throw lightning bolts at cars ont he 405.

Astute Observation by zubs
2009-06-11 11:37 AM

Wasn’t there 2 people who died of lightning strikes last week?

and now this seller wants to get rid of his apartment with the lightning system….coincidence? I don’t think so.

Astute Observation by alan
2009-06-11 07:58 AM

This is listed as a short sale, chances the bank will approve are slim and none, REO coming.

Astute Observation by Lee in Irvine
2009-06-11 08:34 AM

I wonder why the banks are not approving more short sales?  I wonder if it has something to do with the gov’t backstopping the banks?  Yes.

I wonder why the banks are allowing default owners to live in the property rent free for months without forcing a foreclosure?  I wonder if it has something to do with the gov’t backstopping the banks?  Yes.

I wonder why it takes so long from the time the bank takes possession of the REO, to list the property?  I wonder if it has something to do with the gov’t backstopping the banks?  Yes.

Under normal circumstances (without govt support), all three of these events would cause havoc on a banks balance sheet.

Astute Observation by Chris
2009-06-11 11:28 PM

I wonder why everything is starting to seem fine even though we’re still losing jobs by the minutes? I wonder if it has something to do with gov’t backstopping everything? YES!!!

Astute Observation by jimfromJaxFla
2009-06-12 11:20 AM

Well said Lee..
Not only do the Banks make $$ on the sales of homes..  Receive Backstopping $$$$  from the Gov’t..  they also get the asset back as well… what a deal.. Can’t lose..  Moral hazard anyone?? 
I guess the FED really does control our Country now…

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-06-11 08:00 AM

In case you forgot, there is a serious problem with recasting ARMs, particularly Option ARMs:

Option ARMs: Paying $98 a month on a $350 Thousand Mortgage

Option ARMs Threaten U.S. Housing Rebound as 2011 Resets Peak

Astute Observation by Lee in Irvine
2009-06-11 09:39 AM

Just think ... you can leverage $350,000 with a monthly obligation of $98.  And the loan doesn’t recast until it reaches 145% ltv.  LoL WTF  What the hell kinda of a ponzi scheme, bullshit loan is this?

BTW, Freddie Mac says the avg 30-year fixed increased to 5.59% this week, from 5.29% last week.  Up 30 bps ... LoL

Astute Observation by Gemina13
2009-06-11 11:01 AM

How on earth was this woman qualified for a $350,000 second mortgage?  How much was her income, and where was it coming from?  What assets did she put up as collateral?  If she had insufficient income (which definitely seems the case) and few or no assets, who was the idiot that approved this loan?

Yeesh.  Who wants to bet that she was shown a ton of paperwork, hurried through it, and assured everything would be fine?  And because she thought she was getting an unbelievable deal, she signed it?  Yet another excellent example of why we desperately need financial education included in schools.  Too many people have no clue, as IR stated above, how to do the math.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-06-11 11:10 AM

Excellent questions. She owned the house for 45 years. The mortgage should have been paid long ago and she’d have been mortgage free for 15 years. My guess is she’s been refinancing for current consumption with no thought to repayment and hit the jackpot when the $350,000 option became available.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2009-06-11 01:11 PM

Exactly.  That’s a damned nice loan.  You give me $350,000, and I only have to pay you $98 a month?  And it takes forever to recast?  I’ll take a dozen, please.

Heck, the lady is 73.  She might die before it recasts.

Astute Observation by Lee in Irvine
2009-06-11 02:40 PM

She might die before it recasts.

It’s about the bank inheriting her home instead of children/grandchildren.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-06-11 11:01 AM

Irvine Renter:
Thanks for the link. An excellent article.
Question for you:
  A current article quantitating the mortgage problem states, “... there are still about half a trillion dollars’ worth of option ARMs, which allow borrowers to add unpaid interest to the principal they owe. There’s an even more alarming $2.5 trillion in “alt-A” loans…”
Option ARM is a type of loan; alt-A is a type of borrower. I see loads of articles quoting numbers in this manner. To me, the numbers are meaningless since the categories overlap, perhaps very significantly - am I correct or missing something?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-06-11 02:15 PM

No, you are correct; they do overlap. The media is just quoting numbers without really understanding them. The important point is that most of these loans are still outstanding. Some people have commented here and on other blogs that perhaps these loans have already made there way through the system and that there may not be many future foreclosures because of these loans. Those people are wrong, the second wave of foreclosures is still coming, and it is going to be huge.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2009-06-11 11:04 AM

IR,
You want the bank to deprive her of a $98 monthly payment on a $350,000 loan.  She’s 73 yo and is entitled to essentially a free ATM for life.  IR, you must be really heartless.  :}

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2009-06-11 11:12 AM

IR, I forgot the banks and underwriters are also entitled to large fees for each loan made.  No matter if the borrow can pay.  You don’t want to see their children and spouses suffer going without the latest fashions and newest cars?
We need MORE bailout for them and the banks.  :}

IMHO, this property with unlimited utilities cost by common metering is a time bomb.

Astute Observation by george8
2009-06-11 08:41 AM

How much can a unit like this rent for a month?

Astute Observation by Perspective
2009-06-11 10:33 AM

$2,000-$2,500. The Villa Siena apt complex is right across the street making comparison shopping easy:  http://www.rental-living.com/Communities/Villa-Siena/Prices-And-Floorplans/.

It’s interesting watching these towers built right around Villa Siena because we were renting there for three years during all of this development.  The premium you’d pay to “own” one of these units was really unbelievable as compared to what you could rent at Villa Siena.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2009-06-11 01:19 PM

So, half the monthly rent will go to pay the $1,036 monthly HOA.  ROTFLOL.

That makes the value of the property something like $200-250k.

Astute Observation by Mitoman
2009-06-11 09:01 AM

Wow, renting the apartment out can barely pay for HoA…

Astute Observation by ockurt
2009-06-11 09:11 AM

IR, what do you think this place is worth with the HOA’s and all?

$300k tops?

I see a very limited market for these high-rises.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-06-11 09:27 AM

Yes, the valuations here will be similar to the North Korea towers down the street. With low interest rates (which seem to be fading) an owner-occupant breaks even at about $350K, but cashflow investors would look for about $250K. If interest rates keep rising, those numbers keep falling.

Astute Observation by panda bear
2009-06-11 09:33 AM

My starting bid $115, max at $150

C’mon now, it’s only 2BR.  Doesn’t matter how nice it is, it’s an apartment.

Astute Observation by Gemina13
2009-06-11 12:32 PM

I don’t understand the mindset either.

10 years ago, a friend and his wife bought a cramped townhome in Pasadena for about $330K.  I wandered through it and remarked, “For what you’re paying, you could rent a nicer unit just down the street.”

For my trouble, I got the never-ending lecture about how buying was better, even at what was then a WTF price.

In 2002—and I don’t know how this happened—they sold the townhome at a loss.  They moved to Phoenix, and bought a McMansion a few miles east of Lake Pleasant for $310K.  In 2008, when they divorced, the house next to theirs was sold for $245K.  Same floor plan, same square footage, slightly different elevation.  They didn’t even try to sell the house this time.  As for equity, they didn’t have enough to bother cashing it out.

There are people who are simply convinced that they must buy, no matter what the price, because renting is just for losers.  It really doesn’t matter if it’s a cheap block of stuccoed styrofoam, or a glorified apartment—if it has a price tag and can be financed for 30 years, they have to have it.

Astute Observation by Laura Louzader
2009-06-13 01:45 PM

The first thing a prospective buyer in this building should do, if he ‘s really serious about the place, is examine the building’s financial statements to see just how that $1000 HOA is allocated. I hope a good part of it goes toward a reserve fund for future repairs.

$1000 is excessive for a new unit, even one this size, even if it includes utilities. My basis for comparison are vintage (80 years old or more) condos and co-operative high rises here in Chicago, which are known to be maintenance nightmares. I am looking at a beautiful 1675 sq ft unit in a 1928-vintage highrise, which has a HOA fee of $690 a month including heat, and part of it is going to the building reserve, against future major repairs. This is an OLD building, and maintains a good reserve, yet the HOA isn’t nearly so high.

Remember that the building amenities like the pool, the large lobby, the concierge, the garage, have to be paid for every month, and those costs will rise, especially as the place ages and needs major repairs.

Astute Observation by bill shoe
2009-06-11 09:18 AM

IR, Since this post is using the school/education theme you should point out that this property combines Irvine prices with the Santa Ana school district!  Raise a new generation of kids who don’t learn to spell and then become realtors!

Looking forward to JT Schmids at the end of the month.

Astute Observation by Priced_Out_IT_Guy
2009-06-11 11:33 AM

LMAO!

“Raise a new generation of kids who don’t learn to spell and then become realtors!”

That should be the new slogan of the Santa Ana School District.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
Astute Observation by newbie2008
2009-06-11 10:42 AM

If the BO plan did not allow for creative accounting to make the banks appear solvent (i.e., WTF pricing on the underwater assets) and CA’s FC delays, the FC rate would be much worse.  FC’ed houses would actually be on the market instead of the shadow inventory, and many more house will be foreclosured.  The govt’s plan is like having a treatable cancer but taking pain meds to treat or reduce the pain or symptoms instead of treating to cure the cancer.  Japan III here we come.

Astute Observation by Lee in Irvine
2009-06-11 09:47 AM

Freddie Mac says mortgage rates at 7-month high.

LoL

Astute Observation by grabasnorkel
2009-06-11 10:16 AM

Ahh, many people knew those condo buyers would end up like this. IIRC the total HOA on these places was upwards of 1000-1200/mo and more. Add in ~1000/mo in taxes, and you’d be lucky to cash flow even without any interest expenses! Why throw your money on rent when you can buy AND rent at the same time? LOL

IR, why don’t you profile one of the defaulted properties owned by the Real Housewhores of OC? I’m sure many will get a kick out of that. It’s Coto de Caza, not Irvine, but who’s counting? smile

BTW, thanks for quoting me last week in one of your posts - I’m glad people understood the point I was trying to make.

Astute Observation by grabasnorkel
2009-06-11 10:33 AM

Oh, one more thing, I seem to recall from my college days that this was once a toxic waste dump. Quick - buy now - they’re not making any more superfund sites! LOL

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-06-11 10:46 AM

It’s good to hear from you. Thanks for stopping by. You comment was right on about lending; in fact, it really changed my perspective as to what solutions are realistically available to solve the debt problem.

Astute Observation by awgee
2009-06-11 02:16 PM

Because IR’s buddy features homes in CDC.

http://www.cotohousingblog.com/

and find the post named “Woo Hoo” cheese

Astute Observation by Eat that!
2009-06-11 12:17 PM

Anyone noticing more REO listings than usual?

Astute Observation by Gemina13
2009-06-11 12:37 PM

Amazing, isn’t it?  Hoocoodanode that imposing a 90-day moratorium on foreclosures would just create a backlog of defaults? wink

I have a feeling we may see that many would-be flippers/knife-catchers tried to grab up properties in that 90-day window, and are now desperately trying to unload them.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2009-06-11 01:42 PM

Absolutely.

I track Redfin searches of the city of Riverside, houses only, exclude short sales, exclude under contract, <$175k.  The selection in this category is 95% REOs or so.  The low was 121 homes for sale on both 6/4 and 6/5.  Today the number is at 148.  I started tracking this dataset on 4/1, where the number was 336.  The high was 337 on 4/3, and, with brief exceptions, it has been falling every since, until the past couple days.

I don’t think the banks have started releasing more REOs recently-I think the cause for the rebound in supply is that higher interest rates have driven away buyers, so they aren’t getting snapped up immediately upon being released to the market any more.

Astute Observation by Newport Golf
2009-06-11 09:45 PM

Wait until the construction lender forecloses on the unsold developer units…

Astute Observation by LC
2009-06-12 12:32 AM

The only thing “urban” about that place is the incessant traffic jam on Jamboree.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

<< Back to main