Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- zovall on A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
Recent Posts
- A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
- $499,900 :: 84 Deermont 51, Irvine CA, 92602
I have to agree with the geographic component. Foreclosures have not been slow, or missed the ‘safe havens’ in SEFL. Prices have fallen on many of those very expensive properties. It puzzles me that Irvine props would be so slow to get foreclose. From what I’ve seen, many toxic loans were originated out of Irvine. If the bank foreclosure operator, based in Irvine, sees a dq loan in Miami or Irvine, which would he be more likely to push through quick, and which will he drag his feet on?
CA has to adjust its property tax law. You have to increase the tax value to the appraisal used for a cash-out heloc/refi, or at least a maximum 1.25X loan amount (don’t want to punish someone who takes a loan from 10% LTV to 20% LTV).
THE PROPERTY NEEDS RENOVATION.THE BUYER SHOULD INVESTIGATE THE PROPERTY WITH PROFESSIONAL INSPECTORS, AND SHOULD REQUEST ALL PROPERTY INFORMATION FROM THEIR AGENT.
I suspect the above is going to become a fairly common disclaimer in listings for properties with a long history of squatting.
I’d also add following the article posted above today that while I think most in California/FL/AZ are aware of housing problems in their markets the rising problems elsewhere aren’t on the radar. I’m in NJ and when I mentioned to people that NJ is 3rd in the country for delinquent mortgages (after FL/NV) the reaction is that I am making it up and am delusional. I’m not even sure I can say we are in the denial stage - you have to be aware of an issue to deny it and I don’t think that is even the case.
I live in NJ, and know exactly what you’re talking about. The thing is that there are many parts of NJ where homes are relatively affordable; however the rest of the state is made up of the McMansion pretenders who believe they’re special.
NJ is a RECOURSE state. This mistakenly leads people to believe that there won’t be any problems with housing, since it’s not as easy to walk away from your mortgage. In this case you bank goes after you for their loss, you claim bankruptcy, and the problem is solved.
At least in NJ, there’s some effort to crackdown on fraud:
Feds arrest 20 in alleged N.J. mortgage-fraud operation
Defendants in N.J. mortgage fraud ring tried to take more than $5M ...
Man, mother are convicted in mortgage fraud scheme
Owner of N.J. title search company accused of $2.7M mortgage fraud
I love the one about the title search company owner - “Cichy and Nowak, who has dual U.S. and Polish citizenship, used the proceeds from the alleged scheme to run his construction business and pay for a Mercedes Benz, furniture, clothing and trips to Aruba and Poland, authorities said.”
See how Real Estate can facilitate living the American dream!!! Ballin’!
For 819K, the property should be ready to move in and ready for renovation. I have a feeling we are at the tail end of this RE dead cat bounce. Buyers were brought forward due to the gimmicks and the economy is not improving. In a sane world, a property like this would probably go for 600 to 650K. Hopefully sanity will return.
Another implication of this squatting is that people are still living in the “jumbo loan neighborhoods” who should by now be looking to either buy or rent in lower-priced areas.
This in turn is discouraging genuine “move-up” relocation by adding an extra, artificial, amount to the natural location premium.
At some point this will probably revert to the mean, and in fact if financial factors were all that mattered (and I acknowledge this is NOT the case) you might see some folks attempting to capture the artificial premium. Possibly by selling and renting in the premium area while buying and letting in the beaten-down area, intending to reverse the process later.
Alan Greenspan is opening his trap again:
Greenspan Says U.S. May Soon Reach Borrowing Limit
Did you read that, Planet Reality? Think low rates are here to stay permanently for the next decade or two?
Then again, Alan Greenspan hasn’t exactly had the best track record lately when it comes to making economic predictions.
Sure the rates could go up, that is a really good way to kill off what little recovery there is , followed by another recession and they drop again. The only way you’re going to see them go up is when the demand for credit exceeds the supply and the economy improves enough to raise them. Not sure when that is going to happen, but I have not seen any serious indication of it. Anyone seen hoards of consumers beating down doors to buy things? Anyone seen unemployment dropping as all those businesses hire new employees to handle all that demand? Did not think so…
The current problems with the Euro simply drive’s down the rates in the US as investors move into Treasuries and drive down the yields. So if you want interest rates in the US to go up, the Euro has to solve their problems and bring back investors. Like that is going to happen any time soon. More likely the Euro is going to self destruct over the next year or so. Whatever is left over is not going to be all that stable and attractive. You could by the “new” German Mark and help to drive up that currency, thereby killing their export market, but that is about it. No way it can absorb all those dollars.
Maybe you are counting on the Chinese to solve the problem, like letting their currency rise and stop buying treasuries so that the dollar will drop and punish us for being bad debtors. That is a pretty good way to kill their export market and create millions of angry unemployed Chinese. That sounds like lots of fun, but not going to happen either.
So get used to cheap money and pretty much free debit for the foreseeable future. As the recession moves in to the future there is simply nothing on the horizon that is going to overcome these conditions.
I agree with you there.
One positive thing that came out of this whole financial/economic mess was the cost of my education, and the cost of paying the loans back. I locked in the tuition price before the giant college tuition bubble, then when it came time to pay those loans back rates were ridiculously low. I consolidated my federal loans at 3.25%, and my private loans (which are adjustable rates) have been hovering around 3%.
Steve
a) there is no recovery currently
b) recession/depression does not guarantee rates will go down
c) treasuries are the next bubble to pop
d) china wont buy treasuries forever, and if they do, they will demand much higher returns
e) a rising chinese currency means the chinese can buy what they make instead of loaning us money to buy it
f) if your neighbor bought a house in 2004, heloc’d the money out to buy fancy cars and vacations, just got a pay cut, and came to you to borrow money, would you lend it to him at 3%?
How exactly do these “analysts” come up with the number of months of inventory? The article listed says that “Miami has the largest backlog with a 62-month supply. But unlike New York, Miami’s shadow inventory has fallen from its March 2008 peak of 129 months.”
So somehow in the last 27 months (since March 2008), 67 months worth of inventory has cleared. Either I don’t understand time or this “statistic”.
The months of inventory calculation is the total inventory divided by the sales rate. For instance, if a market has 1,000 homes in inventory, and they are selling 10 a month, they have 100 months of inventory. The calculation is very sensitive to changes in the rate of sales, so it can fluctuate wildly in a thinly traded market.
I used this calculation in the recent posts I did on distressed inventory in Irvine and Orange County.
Yeah, I get it. But more generally I question the utility of a metric that is off by such a wide margin. Is claiming that we have 127 months of inventory so helpful if, in reality (because apparently this actually has happened), the inventory can be cleared in half the time? In my opinion, not so helpful.
I’m going to make a mental note to ignore this statistic from now on.
I don’t use it very often for the reason you described. Steve Thomas from Altera Real Estate uses it often, and the OC Register picks up on it in their capacity as real estate shills.
The calculation has some value in the resale market where sales figures are more stable, but it isn’t anything I would read much into.
IMO, it is fairly good indicator when one uses SALES as you are referring to. Steve Thomas does not used closed sales. He uses homes in escrow or as her refers to them, “deals”. Using homes in escrow miscounts by a factor of at least 200%, therefore his monthly inventory calculation is misleading at best and most likely an intentional fabrication, LIE.
I didn’t realize that. The only reason he would use escrows rather than sales would be to intentionally deceive. I can’t imagine another purpose for using escrows which is subject to frequent cancellations other than to make the denominator larger and make the number of months of inventory look smaller.
Check it out for yourself on Lansner’s blog. At first Thomas called them sales until a few folks pointed out that his “sales” were incorrect by huge numbers. He then admitted that he used pending sales and now refers to them as “deals” in his matrix. I have personally compared his “deals” with sales and properties in escrow when he applied his calculations to specific areas and found that his “deals” matched the total number of homes in escrow, not accounting that the properties are in escrow each time he counts, therefore he is counting each time as a deal. Nor does his use of deals account for the numerous times short sales are in and out of escrow.
And check out the esculpatory language Lansner uses to distance himself from the results.
Another assumption is the first 10 sales and last 10 sales are created equally (i.e. a Linear function). That simply isn’t true especially in the Jumbo range market.
Two edge sword of the short seller.
In a non-recourse state as CA, the seller may be better using a FC with no other recourse than using a short sale. The short sale contract may have clauses to reimburse the banks at a latter date for the shortness of the sale. Best to read over the contract with a fine tooth comb and have a RE/contract lawyer also look it over.
As for the rate of FC on Dq’s by lenders. Who would your forclose on first, your neighbor or some one 1000 miles away? As a bankster, who would you rather foreclouse on, your co-worker with a 2 million HEW withdraw and 2 years Dq or Joe six pack with a 20% down who’s behind 6 months Dq?
IrvineRenter,
How’s your FL and the Great Depression blog coming along?
We visited this house.
It is empty. It needs total re-build = paint, all windows, all floors, all bathrooms and kitchen. Everything needs to be redone, including roof and garden. The sweemingpool is very small and the whole back yard is a mess. But there is no evidance to an intentional damage by the former occupants of the house. It is only old and neglected. Never been treated. One more thing - It doesn’t look like a 3000 sqf. Maybe they count the garage which is a very large 3 car garage. The neighborhood is nice, and the comperables are around 830-860. Given the house’s condition, one must count 80-100k for renovations.
We were told that there are offers for 750-785k, and thought it is much too high for the risk of this house. Unfortunately, as long as there are buyers out there that give that kind of money, the prices won’t come down. At least if that house will be sold for 785k, it will be a new lower comperable, still not low enough though.
As to the question if and when to buy - We pay 45K/year for rent (though we don’t pay taxes, HOA exc.), and we don’t get tax discount for our renting payment like we would for our mortgage payment. We also have very nice downpayment from our old house (overseas, and from many years of hard work and saving,(we are not so young any more) always paying the full credit statment at the same month. so it makes sense to buy, even if the house price will fall 35k/year. The thing is - no one knows how low it will fall, and as I said before, as long as there are people who pay, the prices won’t fall. We are still waiting.
IR, you wrote:
“The areas where prices have not crashed yet are the areas without many subprime loans and subprime foreclosures.”
Does Irvine fall into that category?
If not, why are many prices at peak levels and how is TIC able to raise prices each phase for their new homes?
If so, wouldn’t banks be foreclosing faster in Safe Haven areas since price retention is better?
Yes, Irvine does fall into this category. We did not have much subprime here.
Prices are near peak prices in select neighborhoods because some people are willing and able to pay peak prices there. In neighborhoods where the squatters haven’t been pushed out, there have been few distressed sales. A quick look at foreclosure radar shows how much visible distressed inventory there is, but these sales are postponed over and over again.
The entire Irvine market is about 20% below peak prices.
The Irvine Company raises prices with each phase because that is what builders do to create a sense of urgency to sell homes. They have been selling houses for under market prices until just recently in order to maintain positive price momentum. They are smartly taking advantage of the lender’s policies of squatting to sell a few homes into the restricted supply conditions.
I think banks would be wiser to foreclose and get what they can in areas where prices haven’t crashed yet, but they have another view. They seem to believe they can make prices go up by removing all the supply, then they can meter it out slowly once prices are back at the peak. I think this policy will fail as the cartel weakens. Only time will tell who is right.
Yes, Irvine does fall into this category. We did not have much subprime here.
That’s how I feel, but I think many readers of this blog think that Irvine is the capital of subprime lending. Many of the lenders may have been HQ’ed here but that doesn’t mean the majority of the buyers in Irvine used them.
they used Option ARMs and HELOCs, and the HQs are in Irvine for a reason: a talent pool of employees that know the mortgage industry.
do they “know” the mortgage industry on as superior a level as the Mortgage Bankers Association?
A “prime” option-ARM is still a “subprime” loan.
There’s also no HOA for the first year plan on the new condo’s at Teller. Good to have the HOA start on a good footing—at least the first year’s budget will not be shot with squatters and the paying members making up for the units not sold.
If the govt allows bank borrowing from govt at near zero percent, 4% down on purchases and unlimited squatting, the cartels can keep the prices up until the govt removes the support. I’m getting discouraged from the freebies the govt is giving the ilresponsible borrowers and banksters and all the libaility coming my childrens’ way.
“I am shocked by the squatting. I really am. It never occurred to me that lenders would simply give away homes to people. Do lenders really believe they can do this without dramatic long-term consequences on borrower behavior?”
Sadly, this is what’s currently happening. All that talk late last year about Option ARMs blowing up and a few months ago where BofA is going to increase foreclosure processes have not panned out. We’re still not seeing massive increase in short sales, NODs, NOTs, and regular sales by folks cashing out while the going is good.
I said a few months ago that patience is virtue. Well, that virtue is starting to dry out.
Sad….just sad….especially for folks who are **actually** paying rents.
There’s one other option. Banks go under when there’s no one to save them. Once the mortgages are in the hands of another private entity (not the government of course) there will be no reason to pretend and there will be action. A change of attitude in Washington could come from anti bailout candidates.
Ya i totally agree with your statement every one is stuck now by there own magic created to increase the nation economy.
Ethan McCord, seen carrying wounded children in the Wikileaks Apache attack video, writes an apology letter to the grieving family and to Iraq. He also wants the wars to end.
http://www.askbutwhy.com/2010/06/ethan-mccord-talks-about-wikileaks.html