Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Recent Posts
- A Review of The Field Tract at Lambert Ranch
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
- $499,900 :: 84 Deermont 51, Irvine CA, 92602
I’m still amazed that you find SO MANY of these particular examples:
Purchased 13 years ago (should be half paid-off by now), but instead over 10 years later they are trying to sell at TWICE their purchase price - yet IT’S A SHORT SALE… Over a decade later!
A half-million-dollar (overpriced) short-sale on a home purchased for $285k. But the bank should reduce her balance, right, to avoid foreclosure?
I didn’t see anything in this article blaming HOMEOWNERS like this one, and they should!
“I’m still amazed that you find SO MANY of these particular examples”
I am still amazed at how bad these cases are. I thought that perhaps I had documented some of the worst in 2008 and 2009 because the most distressed borrowers gave up first. However, even now in 2011, I still find people like today that were so irresponsible, people who took out so much mortgage money, even after 4 years of writing about HELOC abuse, it is still shocking.
I wonder the degree to which people were using heloc money to pay their mortgages. Say you have a home paid for, then refi at 80% LTV. The cash-out money would last a long time towards payments.
I guess that more often the money went for 2nd and 3rd houses/condos as investments, with some rent money and further refinances and HELOCs pooled together to pay the mortgages, plus some toys to keep up appearances. On second thought, since down payments weren’t required, you may well be right.
Purchased 13 years ago (should be half paid-off by now), but instead over 10 years later they are trying to sell at TWICE their purchase price - yet IT’S A SHORT SALE… Over a decade later!
Hey ... come on. Did you not see a spike after 9/11 in European Luxury/Sports cars? How about those 2-tone Rolex watches that are/were so common on middle aged, balding, overweight, Ed Hardy wearing pretenders? Then there’s the middle aged MILF’s in The OC had to go get their boobs enhanced ... top it off with a new Louie Vuitton purse. Remember this shit?
Right after 9/11, George Bush told everyone to go out and BUY, BUY, BUY. Alan Greenspan took the hint and promptly dropped the discount rate to 1%. “FREE MONEY EVERYONE, let’s party”!
We’re all rich ... selling houses to each other, and moving paper around.
Now we watch the aftermath. :/
Yves Smith had a good entry in the room-for-debate section of the NYTimes. She has a more complete version with the same main idea on her blog. The gist is that terms like “greed, ineptitude or both” are simply not strong enough and not fully accurate.
You can say that a torturer was mean and nasty, but if he’s severed your legs and done even worse, calling him mean and nasty, while accurate, just doesn’t capture what happened. The FCIC could have gone further, but that would have led to real changes, which it seems few want.
Excellent point!
Just think, 3 years after the equity markets went kaput, TARP and Lehman, we still have no true reform. Not only that, but all the Too Big To Fail Banks have all become bigger.
Sometimes I ask myself, have I become jaded due to my age, or is it because of the history that we’re presently watching.
Because of when she bought it seems to me that had she just made regular payments (30 yr. fixed)and sold at the peak of the bubble she might have made quite a bit of money comparatively. Not knowing her interest rate and what this property went for at the peak who knows.
Of course when you factor in the free rent she’s had…maybe her method was better.
Greenspan didn’t see the problem because he didn’t want to. He was wholly (or holy) devoted to the markets. His faith was (was not is) unshakable. His belief that markets are self-correcting and self-regulating were bedrock to his faith. He was really more of a high-priest than anything else.
“His belief that markets are self-correcting and self-regulating were bedrock to his faith. He was really more of a high-priest than anything else.”
Yes, he was an Ann Rand disciple who kept his faith in markets above reason and data.
I’m sorry but I just don’t buy the ignorance excuse. This crap is not rocket science. If you just follow history anybody can understand the effects of federal or centralized banking. He’ll they even give this Financial fleecing a “cyclical” term .. “the business cycle”. As if it has somthing to do with business.
These people are not stupid. They know exactly what the game plan is.
I doubt anything will change. In fact I won’t be surprised when people will have to borrow money for fuel or food in the future. Housing has been controlled by the banks since the first mortgage was introduced after ww2.
There is no such a thing as a free market when govt subities or lending is involved.
Hey Me ... did you know that that type of talk used to be conspiratorial, now it’s mainstream.
It *used* to be conspiratorial, but that was when they feared that the american people would actually do something about it. Now they know most would rather watch brain mush TV. Most people I talk to in life DON’T WANT TO KNOW…period.
They don’t want to know about fractional reserve banking, groups that direct and control the world, or anything that involves THINKING.
Every now and then the tree of liberty needs to be watered with blood, if liberty is to remain. We are very close to that time, and usually, it’s the little people’s blood like yours and mine.
Swiller, You sound like you just watch the animated film American Dream. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU
IrvineRenter, while i usually respect your opinions and observations, how can you be so blind as to the effects of manipulated interest rates on an economy?
It sends false signals to every sector. It breeds widespread malinvestment. It creates the illusion of prosperity.
It is the fountainhead of our current woes.
Read greenspan’s “gold and economic freedom” in rand’s “capitalism: the unknown ideal”. Is it not glaringly obvious his actions of late are a complete contradiction to his earlier writings?
Business and consumer will only make poor choices when the air is clouded with the fog of cheap money.
American, wake up.
AG and Ben are two of the smartest persons we can pick form this plant. But they are also the shameless too.
The Fed chair position just too precious, if you ever watch Lord of Ring you will understand what I am saying. The only care re-nomination, they mortgage this country this China, India already.
Without Fed chair position, they just an ordinary professor, live in an humble 500K house , in a college town.
Bush, Obama and even Ron Paul will re-nominate Ben in 2013 anyway, because they already the Fed to election machine: continue refinancing our country to give an illusion of false prosperity, so the president can get re-elected.
His belief that markets are self-correcting and self-regulating were bedrock to his faith..
How can a man who gooses the entire economy by manipulating interest rates be said to believe in free market forces?
If he had said, “we need the market to correct and that means recession. we need the market to set interest rates instead of us, the fed. recession is the cure. those with unsound leverage positions need to fail. people need to get out of debt, prices of goods need to fall to reach market equilibrium” then you could argue the case he still follows Rand, believes in free market forces, and capitalism.
Maybe she took the money purchased elsewhere and rented this one out.
The list price is close to what is owed.
It appears to me that she’s looking to unwind this at a minimal loss.
If she rented this one, she could easily have been collecting rent w/o making payments to the bank. Similar to squatting, but cash-in-the-pocket.
Exactly,
I think this happens more often than not.
IR
“What is shocking to me is that this report got so much right. Government reports are usually whitewashes of their own ineptitude”
And your basing this opinon on ‘what’? You may have a low opinion of our goverment but congressional reports are generally good. The report on the Space schuttle disaster was right on in identifying the O-ring failure and the 911 report was very good.
Cash-out refinances need to reset property value for tax purposes. There is no good argument against this, and it will serve two good purposes: help balance CA’s budget, and discourage heloc abuse.
correction…
“all” refinances should be reported to the state and trigger a property tax resest. However, HELOCs are not refinances, you are taking out a loan which backed by collateral - your house. Up until the great bubble, HELOCs were not risky because housing values didn’t change that much. They also weren’t as common before the bubble either. So this property should only have be reappraised in 2006 and 2007 for property tax purposes when the 1st loan was refinanced.
On the business side… whole nother problemo… because corps keep business properties for multiple decades, unlike most personal property. Corporate property should be reassesed every 5 to 10 years period.
Of course, this mean re-opening prop 13.
I said cash-out because you should not treat someone who is refi’ing to get a lower rate in the same way you treat someone who is refi’ing to cash-out.
To get a HELOC you need some appraisal. If the appraisal and to-be borrowed total debt exceeds the tax value of the home, tax value goes up. If appraisal > tax value, BUT total borrowed debt < tax value, no reassessment.
You’re wrong about housing values not changing much. If housing values didn’t go up at rates greater than inflation, what do you have prop 13 for? Prop 13, in principle is a sensible rule, but needs slight modifications. I understand the likelihood of change is inversely proportional the insanity index of CA’s gov’t - iow, not very likely.
all we need are decades of rising interest rates and real estate will not outpace wage inflation.
I happen to have some additional info on this property. First, it is scheduled to go to a foreclosure sale this week, according to my discussion with the realtor this past weekend during an open house. There is also an $11,000 2nd mortgage that the lender is refusing to release that the buyer would have to pay off in order to get it before the foreclosure sale. And last but not least, there is over $3,000 in termite damage to the house that the new buyer would have to pay to repair.
Touring through the house, the flooring appeared in decent shape, but there have been zero upgrades to anything else in the house. This may be inside the Woodbridge loop, but I’d still categorize it as a fixer-upper. Over the past couple years, it seemed like problem properties used to be confined to the less-desirable fringes of El Camino Real (e.g. along the RR tracks) and Orangetree, but now we’re seeing them migrate further and further into the mainstream of Irvine. I guess the flood of foreclosures and shadow inventory is just too much for the flippers to absorb. Hence the price declines.
Irvine is NOT immune!
-Darth
I’ve said this a million times, and I’ve never, EVER gotten a response… I’ll say it again.
Going back to 2001/2002- what would have happened if Greenspan/ Bernanke/ Anyone suggested tighter mortgage regulations? required 20% down for a new mortgage? require equity for refinancing? Required notarized documentation for loan origination? yeah, that’s right, all you people, yeah you, would have been yelling “COMMUNISTS! FASCISTS! LET THE FREE MARKET WORK! THEY’RE TAKING OUR GUNS!”
So, in the end everyone deserves what happened.
LOL. What a moronic observation. I can just picture the author frothing about the mouth as he typed that.
no, I’m not the one frothing. I’m *imagining* the frothing that would have occurred had *anyone* attempted to cool down the absurdly hot RE market. Think back to then dude- EVERYONE was making insane amounts of money. Everyone who touched RE made 6 figures per transaction it seemed. Just imagine the recoil if Greenspan, or anyone for that matter said anything to try to temper the frenzy.
Go back to 1999, and imagine trying to tell people pets.com is a bad idea. They’ll just scoff at you. As IR as pointed out over and over again, a bubble is inflated by irrational exuberance. You can’t take that away from people.
Of course whoever is benefiting from the current system is not going to want to change it. That’s why the Fed is supposed to be independent - so they can make those politically tough decisions.
I am benefitting from it and I would end the Fed, fiat currency, and fractional reserve banking tomorrow if I was given the chance. I invest based on what is, not on what I would like.
> you, would have been yelling “COMMUNISTS! FASCISTS! LET THE FREE MARKET WORK!”
es:
actually, the groups yelling that were the politicians, regulators and minority boosters bribed by the fees whore class (banks and realtors.)
Anybody who warned about the bubble was shouted down by politicians, which is documented reasonably well online.
“Greenspan and Bernanke were incompetent. “
I take except to that comment. Both men are extreme bright, versed in acedemic and in practice experence. IR and critics are forgetting who these two men work for. Hint: It’s not the US government.
As for market forces not at working, the market for these bankers include knowing that the corporation/shareholders would pay for their mistakes and if faced with BK’ed, then US taxpayers would be forced to bail them out. They maximized their profit (personal) and left the taxpayers holding the bag. That was the model and it did work. You just feel bad about it because you’re left holding the bag. Suck it up and hand over the money. I’m sure Ron Paul is not the only one in Congress who’s figured it out. The rest just want their share.
<stands up, applauds>
Right on, the sooner people accept reality the sooner they will be at peace with what continues to occur and they will make better decisions.
So does your anus hurt?
I mean, that is reality, isn’t it (or you can say you’re not a taxpayer and so it doesn’t hurt)?
Agree 100%.
BHO and the Feds are doing a wonderful job in exporting inflation and unrest to foreign lands. The unrest destabilized foreign currency and markets, thus causing flight to US currency and market for lower US interest rates and high stock prices. Only thing, the special interest groups will demand sending humanitary aid and peace keeping troops, so the taxpayers will need to buy good to send over and pay for the goods and troops. Hopefully the troops will be using US made ammo and not Eastern European ammo.
You are correct once again. They have been extremely sucessful at utilizing the US strength to minimize the damage at home while inflicting pain else where.
The banking cartel and it’s political chronies are not giving up any time soon.
What’s so hard to understand?
Government Sachs tells the FED what to do.
Print money and buy equities.
Is it just me, or does Ben Bernanke look like Karl Marx?
It’s interesting that these reports now state that there is fault with the Central banks yet each one of them blames them for not REGULATING the underwriting and loans that were made. Government officials, in general, don’t see that policies that distort supply and demand are the root problem. As much as the agencies blame the Central Bank they still receive more power to guide the economy to “prosperity”...LOL