Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Recent Posts
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Investors Are Busy in Irvine’s Low-End Housing Market
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
- $499,900 :: 84 Deermont 51, Irvine CA, 92602
More leaks regarding the state AGs’ settlement:
“...As things stand, the settlement, said to total about $25 billion, would cost banks very little in actual cash — $3.5 billion to $5 billion. A dozen or so financial companies would contribute that money. The rest — an estimated $20 billion — would consist of credits to banks that agree to reduce a predetermined dollar amount of principal owed on mortgages that they own or service for private investors. How many credits would accrue to a bank is unclear, but the amount would be based on a formula agreed to by the negotiators. A bank that writes down a second lien, for example, would receive a different amount from one that writes down a first lien…” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/30/business/a-foreclosure-settlement-that-wouldnt-sting.html?_r=2&ref=your-money&pagewanted=print
Thanks, I will use that in a post next week. At first glance, this settlement is a joke. The banks are going to get credit for losses they would have incurred anyway. It may benefit a few loan owners if they reduce principal and let the loan owners stay in their homes, but it isn’t clear whether or not the principal reductions will be part of short sales or unprompted reductions to keep people in properties they can’t afford.
I am eagerly awaiting the details. I don’t need a principal reduction, but I think a rate reduction (to current market rates) would greatly discourage strategic default by borrowers in similar situations to mine.
I think the rate reduction will serve to reduce strategic default at the margins.
It will be interesting to see if they allow it for non-owner occupants. Many landlords who currently have negative cashflow might come closer to breakeven if their rates are lowered.
I didn’t you could own real estate in China? They are still communist, right?
Sorry for the omission…...
I didn’t know you could own real estate in China? They are still communist, right?
Yes, they are communist, but they do allow private property ownership. It’s been part of their tentative embrace of capitalism. These Ponzi viruses may cause them to rethink some of their policies.
Just some Guy: Mao Tse Tung would turn in his grave.
I guess the only “Communists” in China are inside the Government. They only have one Party..the “Communist Party”. I was shocked to learn they live in the best Parts of Beijing in, wait for it..MANSIONS!!
Good luck to the Protesters…China doesn’t have freedom of speech or freedom of the press. It doesn’t tolerate dissent. Authorities can arrest and imprison people who threaten stability, as the party defines it. Any group that dares to protest, even against Property Values declining, will be treated brutally. There are no civil liberties, no labor unions, no centers of political power outside the communist party.
I expect the Corporations and Banks will be running the Country in the same way they do in the US before too long..what’s that? They already do? See, I told you!!
The Communist Party won’t last too long it’s only a matter of time because when those in power have to use violence against Citizens who protest, they will sooner or later fall.
It normally goes like this: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you..then you win.
A view of surrounding office buildings, and a small storage locker! Well hot-damn, all of my lifelong dreams in one place, I gotta get me a piece of that! Where do I sign up?
I note that the association fees are still at their reduced level. I wonder how they are paying for maintenance and repairs, and building up a contingency account for long-term requirements?
My guess is that they aren’t funding anything properly. I suspect there will be big assessments in the future for all the new homeowners.
Alan - you took the words right out of mouth. “View of surrounding office buildings” indeed! That is what I have always wanted - to live in a condo with a view of surrounding office buildings. Think about it…office buildings are so scenic and romantic. Unlike, say, the ocean or the setting sun they never change. They’re always there. Steel and glass, glass and steel…maybe the signage might change, but the buildings will always be there!
When the nearby Astoria was made into a leasing building instead of ownership building, the 6 people who owned apartments in Astoria were bought out. I know one of them. He got bought out at a higher $ value than he bought in.
Talk about getting bailed out, that guy should buy some lottery tickets.
I told him he was going to lose his ass when he bought that apartment in 2009…but I was wrong.
I wasn’t aware they reduced HoAs. Is there a link to that somewhere?
I was in Shanghai in 2008 and there were already many empty high rise condo buildings. But they were not empty because they hadn’t sold. Rather the buyers were mostly pure speculation buyers and they believed if the units were occupied then it would reduce their resale value. Craziest thing I ever witnessed. About the same time I visited Vancouver BC and also saw many empty condo buildings. Similar situation. All of the units were sold but the owners for the most part lived in China and used them as vacation spots. But they were not renting them out presumably because of resale concerns. Construction of new condo buildings were briskly continuing in neighborhoods surrounded with dozens of dark towers.
I was sure that these two markets were headed for a collapse, but at least in Vancouver have seen little sign of it happening. Different cultures have different bubble psychologies I guess.
You can’t sustain a real estate market trading empty boxes. We tried that for a while, and it didn’t work out. If these buyers are holding these units empty, they will eventually resort to plan B and rent them. When that happens, the bottom will drop out of the rental market which will in turn lower rental parity and put more pressure on resale pricing. The double whammy will push prices much, much lower for a very long time.
Look out below….
Good Post, IR.
I lived in China for three years and things are getting crazier than ever. It is worse than California ever was due to the lack of an open economy and a limited number of good investment opportunities. One of the great ‘benefits’ of communism is that the whole society has lost it’s sense of supply and demand. In middle-class areas of Shanghai, condos are stll trading for $500,000 and up, despite the fact that the prevailing wage in those parts is around US$10,000 per year. People don’t bother to rent them out because they are investing ‘for the capital gains’. Sound familiar?
In the smaller cities it is even worse.
Chinese (and Russian) real estate purchases in London, Australia and Vancouver are examples of capital flight.
Wealthy people know that they are only one informant or Cultural Revolution away from losing it all.
So they mainly care about parking capital somewhere else, and generating rental income is low on their list of priorities.
The wealth disparity in China is also so great that some rich people who have “made it” dream of emigrating to countries where they can have a lower profile. Or for now at least keeping their options open.
I think you’re referring to the very, very wealthy few Chinese who can actually move enough of their capital offshore to effect a purchase in a foreign land.
If many of them are “paper tigers” much like all the wanna-be RE tycoons here during our massive run-up then they’ve not got any real cash at all. No cash means no buying assets in foreign markets.
Guess that means that all those mysterious FCB’s (foreign cash buyers) who are supposedly going to save OC property values are now actually F***ked Chinese Busted.
As IR suggests .... LOOK OUT BELOW!!!