Nobody Wants This One

Jan 16th, 2009  
by IrvineRenter  in Short Sale

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by NoWowway
2009-01-16 05:28 AM

My “creative” solution involves a price drop.  I guess that disqualifies me from winning….  wink

This thing has been languishing for over 278 days, so it has not been priced well.  I would think that if they offered it for slightly less than $200/SF - Say $199/sf - they might possibly attract a “value” investor.  It would make the property stand out - more like Santa Ana prices, than Irvine prices.

Oh, and this is not actually IN the new part of “Westpark”.  This is located in the previously-named “Culverdale” which is OLD.  The photo says OLD.

It’s a fairly large home on a fairly large lot.  This would be attractive for a fairly large family.  However if said lot and home need massive makeovers in landscaping and carpet/paint - the size and scope of those projects become unattractive real quick.

As far as who all bought this property back in 2005 - probably a “group” of “investors” who were going to fix the place up and sell when it doubled.  They were planning on replacing the carpet and repainting and doing a flip - that’s why it is mentioned in the MLS description.  That’s my guess.

Astute Observation by Gray
2009-01-17 02:31 AM

Still strange. Why didn’t they fix this place in 2005, when many still believed real estate could only go up???

Astute Observation by Forbear
2009-01-16 06:02 AM

Pray every night an airplane crashes into it and turns it into an inferno.  Oh yea, make sure your not at home.

Astute Observation by BitterRenter
2009-01-16 06:47 AM

I think Irvine needs an old fashioned “Boston Tea Party” on housing. Get out your gas cans and lighters folks, were going to let places like this light the sky!

Astute Observation by mav
2009-01-16 10:53 AM

Would this be organized by the home debtors or bitter renters?  Seems like a good way to keep Irvine prices high.

Astute Observation by BitterRenter
2009-01-16 06:43 PM

Well actually it will bring down the median prices since we’ll only be lighting up $1mil+ homes….hehe

Astute Observation by buster
2009-01-17 09:08 AM

I don’t think there are any bitter renters anymore, only grateful renters.

Astute Observation by doug r
2009-01-17 11:07 PM

Fire!
Sale!

Astute Observation by scott
2009-01-16 07:15 AM

Back in the last big downturn here on the east coast you saw alot of houses like these picked up out of foreclosure by contractors.  You aren’t seeing alot of people these days doing additions to their home so you have alot of contractors looking for work.  Owner occupiers that can afford $500k-ish for a home can do better than this, and this is where the contractors come in.  I don’t think prices are low enough to make the economics work but we know they will get there at some opint, and i think that is a type of buyer you will find for this type of property.

Astute Observation by h
2009-01-16 08:03 AM

They could at least repaint inside.  You can do several rooms if you do it yourself for less than $100, and that might help a little.

Astute Observation by Chuck
2009-01-16 10:17 AM

I agree.  I mean, come on, how much time/effort/money does it take to do some basic things to make a place look better.  Grab a paint can and some brushes, replace the old outlet and light switches, get some decent inexpensive carpet installed from Home Depot.  Then list it as “new paint, new carpet, recent upgrades” and attract some of the many people who were scared way by the original description.  I think today’s sellers (and agents) unwillingness to do some basic work on thier properties continues to amaze me.

Oh yes, dropping the price signifiantly might also help!

Astute Observation by mav
2009-01-16 10:45 AM

In Irvine’s plastic consumer world, it takes hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix this place up.

Does anyone remember what life was like before mass consumer credit?

Astute Observation by Chuck
2009-01-16 11:30 AM

I remember when I bought my house (many years ago!) it looked awful.  Brown shag carpeting, ugly paint, no landscaping.  But back then if you provided some beer and pizza to your buddies you could have a “painting party.”  And through trial and error and some help from friends I was able to put in a lawn and sprinker system.  I think reverting to the “do it yourself” mindset would be healthy for everyone.  Mow your own lawn and save $100 per month.  Have a potluck dinner with your frineds rather than going out to an expensive restaurant.  Man, I am beginning to sound like my parents…...

Astute Observation by mav
2009-01-16 11:35 AM

Chuck, it’s amazing how mass consumer credit changed our lives over the past 30 years.  Due to consumer credit we have been living in a socialist america for 30 years.  Consumer credit has been the great equalizer.  I for one can’t wait until this unsustainable life style goes away.  The idea that anyone would HAVE to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix this place up is completely absurd.

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2009-01-16 04:21 PM

Speaking of which, it’s not just the “do it yourself” crowd which is insane.

For example, we were at my wife’s parents’ house for christmas.  I saw an ad for replacement windows that promised triple glazed, argon filled, low-e glass windows, 10 for $3995 installed and discounts for more.

When I came back, I got a mailer for where I live in Laguna Niguel with a fancy picture advertising double-glazed “insulated” glass windows (no argon, no low-e properties) 10 for $9995 installed, no discounts mentioned.

The cost to do things in SoCal is sometimes multiples of what it costs elsewhere.  BTW, we paid $1.32 for a gallon of gas when we left and came back to $1.89 gallon.  This place is a rip off, and the taxes just add insult to injury.

In the words of the Tan Man, “California Sucks”.

Astute Observation by Lee in Irvine
2009-01-16 08:05 AM

One thing many Orange County home sellers are gonna have to reason with, homes in the “desirable” areas are gonna be the ones the take the next big hit in this market.  Especially on a dollar basis.  The fact of the matter is the typical Santa Ana or Corona SFH has already been killed, in some cases REOs are selling for .30 cents on the dollar vs. the peak sell price.  Unlike Irvine an other “desirable” areas, people can actually get financing in the less expensive communities.

This is very simple ... the best, most desirable bedroom communities in Orange County are gonna go straight to hell, without passing go.

Astute Observation by nefron
2009-01-16 09:46 AM

The agent didn’t bother to list the house’s two biggest selling points:  this neighborhood is assigned to University High, and the homeowner association dues are about the lowest in Irvine.  Other than that, yup, it’s overpriced.

Astute Observation by tustin boy
2009-01-16 09:56 AM

“So let me get this straight: This house is a trashed and needs to be completely done over inside and out. Before I can even begin, I have to spend $600,000. I will need a $120,000 downpayment, plus cash reserves, plus another $100,000 to fix the place up. When I am done, I will be out-of-pocket over $220,000 cash, I will have a $480,000 mortgage, and I will have a 40-year old property in Irvine that will be worth less than my mortgage in two years.”

But it’s Irvine, when you say that to people that aren’t from here they look at you like your crazy, anytime a property has no pictures of the inside, BEWARE

Astute Observation by Cal's Caddy
2009-01-16 10:27 AM

Per the Realtor, “very nice neighborhood”... I think not. Me thinks this is the 3rd worst neighborhood in Irvine.

1) Worst is the few blocks of houses wedged between Irvine HS and Culver Plaza next I-5 freeway.

2) Followed by Orange Tree… non-descript homes in a non-descript neighborhood shadowed by IVC with very few local amenities.

3) Westpark (wink, wink) south of San Leandro, squeezed in by the 405 and Culver. Not really Westpark, these 40 year old homes next to the freeway suffer for the delusion of higher home values due to the proximity of the newer and nicer actual village of Westpark.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-01-16 10:37 AM

San Clemente seems to be another OC area where prices on desirable units over 500k have yet to budge significantly on both sfh and condos. Price per sq/ft is about $350-450 and varies without logic up to $750 or more. One 35 y/o 2br ocean view condo is listed at $495k ($415 sq/ft) down from $675k in Aug, 2006, that would have sold for about $145k in 2000. It is being rented now for $1700/mo unfurnished. Assuming a rent/income ratio of 180, price would be $306000, still well above the $215K that traditional annual increases of 4.5% would reach from 2000-2009. I think prices in the $500K-1.5M range in south OC have a lot further to ultimately fall than 20-25% - more like 40-50% from current levels.

Astute Observation by Patience
2009-01-16 11:08 AM

Thanks for the info on San Clemente. I’ve been looking there.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-01-16 01:27 PM

Patience: check my response to priced-out-it- guy below. Patience is the key. My wife and I decided when we sold in 1999 that if we wanted to buy back in SC a few years after selling when I retired, we could do so at a reasonable price. Who knew!! Consider renting while you wait; rentals are coming down in price. I suspect you’ll end up spending a lot less renting 1 or 2 years than buying 2 years early! And you’ll get to know the community. It’s changed significantly since 1978!

Astute Observation by Patience
2009-01-16 04:24 PM

Maybe I should go by the moniker Goldilocks. I have been looking for 2 years (renting in Turtle Rock now) and I will continue to look until everything is juuust right!

Astute Observation by Priced_Out_IT_Guy
2009-01-16 12:44 PM

SC is owned by old folks or their kids. Most homes from Christianitos to Pico own them outright (excluding new developments like marblehead, talega, and rancho). I wouldn’t count on getting an affordable property in SC anytime soon. Trying to establish oneself in a beach city is pretty difficult.

Astute Observation by Priced_Out_IT_Guy
2009-01-16 12:46 PM

I’d also like to say that I’ve yet to meet a Marine or anyone else from other parts of the country that flock to SC for the beach lifestyle and be able to own a home and put down roots. The younger generate like myself rents and supports the local economy temporarily, finally realizes that we’re 20 years too late, and then moves inland or back home.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-01-16 01:21 PM

Sounds like your very familiar with San Clemente. Why do you suppose so many old folks stayed there - lots of other places in OC??!!
I’m one of the old folks who bought a 3br/2ba condo w/ nice ocean view in 1978 for 105K and sold 21 years later to our second son for $200k (a fair price at the time without a realtor). I agree that those people don’t have to lower their price but there have already been and, I think, will be more who have bought in the mania and will have to sell. In addition, I saw the same percentage price decreases/increases during the 78-99 period that occurred in so. OC. And the kids who won’t be able to use the property will end up selling, too. In short, In my view, SC will be no different than elsewhere in so. O.C. during the next 2-3 years.

Astute Observation by Can't remember my original name
2009-01-16 02:23 PM

Most homes from Christianitos to Pico own them outright (excluding new developments like marblehead, talega, and rancho). I wouldn’t count on getting an affordable property in SC anytime soon. Trying to establish oneself in a beach city is pretty difficult.
—————————-

Are you a card-carrying member of the NAR?  Ha.

By the way it’s Cristianitos - no H.  I guess an area expert wouldn’t know that, though. 

Most homes in this area are certainly NOT owned outright.  Ever heard of running title?  I suggest you do it, sometime.

Astute Observation by Party Pooper
2009-01-16 10:49 AM

Creative Solution

1. Stop paying mortgage. Save up mortgage payment for at least a year bc free living in the house.

2. Once house sells at auction, get free extra money from lender’s REA to move out before 60 days is up.

3. Wait 2 yrs for FHA loan (FHA loans not score driven, only need 12 months on-time payments) or 3 yrs for conventional financing with major $$$ down from a year of no mortgage/rent.


Easy.

Astute Observation by george8
2009-01-16 11:02 AM

Agreed. Just join the crowd. Stop paying mortgage and taxes. Live in it for free just like so many others.

Astute Observation by Jim Jones
2009-01-16 10:54 AM

5,100 Sq. Ft is considered a large lot?

Astute Observation by Gemina13
2009-01-16 12:38 PM

It is for Irvine, where million-dollar homes sit on sod-covered postage stamps.

Astute Observation by Texas Triffid Ranch
2009-01-16 11:00 AM

Yeah, I have a solution for the owner.  Have a friend “accidentally” drive a truck through the house, and declare it a total loss.  He did pay his insurance on time, right?

Seriously, I have a sneaking suspicion that the lot is the reason why the owner bought this dump in the first place.  The original plan wasn’t to do anything to the original house:  the plan was to sell it to an even bigger sucker, who’d demolish it within hours and build some zero-lotline American Godawful on the remains. 

I’ve been watching this happen in Dallas, over and over, with great amusement.  I used to be angry at how these schlubs would tear down older houses with incredible charm in order to build some soulless McMansion, but now I laugh.  The reason is because the schlubs bought the houses at exorbitant rates, demolished them in preparation to rebuild, and then either have the resale fall through or run out of money to build them themselves.  Ergo, they get stuck paying an obscene mortgage on a weed-strewn vacant lot, paying for someone to mow the weeds every week before they get fined by the city for creating an eyesore, and they don’t even have the benefit of renting out the property to cover property taxes.  I mean, a couple of these would make good garden spaces, but why go to that kind of trouble for a spot that’s probably going to be foreclosed upon in another six weeks?

Astute Observation by Craig
2009-01-16 12:41 PM

Hey, it IS a big house by Irvine standards—why not rent out each of the 5 bedrooms to families that have been foreclosed on and lost their homes?  Since Irvine rent is so high, they may even be able to cover their mortgage payments.

The yard has room for a few tents, too—rent out campground spaces.

Astute Observation by tlc8386
2009-01-16 02:38 PM

People expect an older home to be improved over the years doing nothing does not deserve the increase in price.
Not painting or fixing it up is simple maintenance that so many do not seem to do here. I painted my last house with a 12 year paint and that is what sold it besides it being in perfect near new condition at ten years old.
It was worth the price simple as that.

The bubble mentality is going to take a long time to change in people’s minds. You are no longer calling the shots—get over yourself Irvine owners and price your homes with some kind of reality. Think would you buy it yourself?

Astute Observation by Anthony
2009-01-16 02:55 PM

“Don’t worry”, I’d say to the owner.
Heck! You’ll have your loan reduced.
‘bama and Barney (Frank) are coming with a big bailout check.
You’ll live free and clear!
Courtesy of The “Socialist United States of America” - SUSA

Astute Observation by Joe/RI
2009-01-16 05:11 PM

To Scott’s point, here on the East Coast, I know several small contractors that are actively looking for and buying properties like this one (but definitely lower $/sq ft). They have little to no work but do have some cash along with cheap labor. So they target the distressed properties because of lower prices and these properties typically scare away families looking to move in and live life, which also opens the door to price negotiation. Each one I have talked to has plans to rehab and then rent it out and keep it for sale during the rental period. In their view, it’s a way to keep their small crews working and building wealth via asset acquisition for that next big payday bubble.

Astute Observation by dafox
2009-01-21 11:20 AM

just testing something in an old thread:
test

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main