Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Recent Posts
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Investors Are Busy in Irvine’s Low-End Housing Market
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $398,900 :: 191 Lockford, Irvine CA, 92602
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
Do you think it is banks not hesitating to foreclose in Vegas that has pushed prices so low, or is it a supply-demand fundamental.
The cost of housing should instantaneously have only loose correlation with incomes. If you have excess housing, sale prices will be low, even if there are high incomes in an area. Likewise, if supply is tight, then people will push DTIs. What should cancel that out is the invisible hand of new construction.
A huge problem with supply-demand with housing, relative to real consumptive goods, is that the supply does not really move downward. The housing supply only gets bigger. (I understand that some homes eventually get condemned and torn down, but that is a much slower process than shutting down a line at a GM factory).
This becomes an even bigger problem, the higher the rate of home construction, because of the intensity, you can have a large percentage of your local jobs in the home industry. So when it goes, not only do you have this supply overhang, you’ve got lots of workers unemployed, creating more supply overhang…
Another occurrence related to the inability for housing supply to be downwardly elastic is the rate of speculative purchasers who do not intend to live in the homes, or have them function as cash-flow investments. Especially with the zero-low down mortgages, these buyers are the first to walk. As with Miami condos, where 80% of peak bubble purchasers did not intend to occupy, you can get a complete evaporation of demand, leaving supply hanging.
One idea that might be implemented related to underwriting is using an average of people’s incomes, especially if they are business-cycle dependent. How many construction workers/realtors/mortgage brokers used their 2006 incomes - the best they would pretty much be of all time - to qualify for loans? When you ramp up those groups’ purchasing power, with them being a significant portion of a local economy, and then have their incomes yanked, you get trouble.
Exactly.
The real reason Vegas crashed so hard has nothin to do with bank behavior.
Vegas ceased hard because of the huge amount of speculators and huge amount of unnecessary invenorty. Only 30% of Vegas is owner occupied. There are twice as many houses in Vegas as needed.
On top of this the bubble money flowed to vegas revenue. That’s gone. The Vegas job market will continue to be abysmal. The Vegas job market is based on jobs a high school drop out can do. When you add it all up Vegas is not at fundamental value, but not because housing is cheap. Vegas fundamental values are lower than current market values due to speculators (30% owner occupied), twice as many houses built, poor revenues, and high school drop out level jobs. This isn’t getting better any time soon.
Vegas city is 60% oo, Clark county, the same. It is below the national 67% average. Irvine is 55% oo.
The official home ownership rate in Las Vegas is 59%, similar to Orange County which is typically in the low 60s. Please get your facts correct.
Admittedly, that is the 2000 number. The 2010 number is probably lower (not known yet), but 30% sounds too low to me.
A CLOSER LOOK
A comparison of the percentage of owner-occupied, single-family homes in Southern Nevada shows the changes between 2005 and today:
??In North Las Vegas, 59 percent in 2005, 53 percent today of 58,209 single-family homes. The number of single-family homes increased 15,449 since 2005. Of that, 5,955, or 39 percent, are owner-occupied.
??In Henderson, 74 percent in 2005, 68 percent today of 78,541 single-family homes. The number of single-family homes increased 11,829 since 2005. Of that, 4,596, or 39 percent, are owner-occupied.
??In unincorporated Clark County, where land-use matters are overseen by the Clark County Commission, 65 percent in 2005, 58 percent today of 183,473 single-family homes. The number of single-family homes increased 32,632 since 2005. Of that, 8,503, or 26 percent, are owner-occupied.
??In Las Vegas, 67 percent in 2005, 61 percent today of 143,265 single-family homes. The number of single-family homes increased 12,311 since 2005. Unlike the other jurisdictions, the number of owner-occupied homes dropped from 88,388 to 87,770. Meanwhile, the number of nonowner-occupied homes increased 12,929.
As you can see the homes built since 2005 are about 30% owner occupied. Twice as many homes were built as necessary. In Clark County it’s only 26% owner occupied, with over 30,000 homes built.
In Irvine? They can’t build them fast enough.
100% of Americans are unemployed!!!
Oh, I mean, Americans born since 2005, sorry for the confusion.
I would go further in flame to say that every home built in Vegas from 2006- was unneeded. However
. You’re extrapolating to a whole market what might apply to 5% of the market’s total. Even if none of those homes were occupied, it would only impact TOTAL owner-occupancy rate by 5%!
“In Irvine? They can’t build them fast enough”
You’re right. That’s why the Irvine Company has been building out their land as fast as they can in the last few years.
Oh, wait….
What are you talking about?
They’ve been selectively rolling out product to keep the supply low and demand high.
Projects like Orchard Hills have been mothballed by TIC for at least the past three years.
Have you bothered to drive down Irvine Blvd. lately? You should, as you will be witnessing the last open space that was used for agriculture.
You know, that crazy thing that FEEDS people, the thing that our county got it’s name from.
TIC is building out the very last little available open land…enjoy!
So, what you meant to say was that 30 percent of homes built since 2005 are oo, not the entire inventory, right? Because according to your numbers that’s what it looks like. So I guess if you were saying that, both are right: 60% of total inventory are oo, 30% built since 2005 are oo.
What are we arguing about again?
You don’t think it’s significant that 50,000+ homes were built
and 30% are owner occupied???
That’s 5 years, going on 6 years of home sales, never mind no point in trying to educate the dense.
We are taking over a half decade, Las Vegas has absolutely nothing in common with Irvine. Time to accept reality.
Oh but 738 Irvine homes for sale, a whole 3 months inventory is apocalyptic.
I think Las Vegas homes must be similar to dog years for you guys.
1 Irvine home must equal 500 Las Vegas homes, minus a few hundred good jobs
@Swiller:
There’s actually still quite a bit of land left in Irvine… one of the few (if not only) central Orange County cities that can still build new homes in large numbers.
In addition, they are planning to build homes in the Irvine Business Complex… a work/live urban-style project (even I have my doubts).
Land is not running out any time soon… yet people are still paying a premium for it… it’s mind boggling and so unfundamental.
There are a couple [citation needed]s in your post. I seriously doubt twice as many houses were built than were needed (which would indicate one out of two houses in Vegas are currently empty, which is certainly not the case). I also doubt only 30% of houses there are owner occupied.
The vacancy rate there appears to be between 4.5% and 7%. High, but nowhere near 50%.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/nov/15/vacant-homes-fewer-people-vegas/
In 2000, 59.1% of houses in Las Vegas were owner occupied. (2010 data will be out in a couple months.)
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/32/3240000.html
Great news:
Per IHB
1/24/2011 Irvine Inventory 738 homes
1/25/2010 Irvine Inventory 485 homes
Per Housing Tracker
01/17/2011 OC 75% asking price $629,900
01/31/2010 OC 75% asking price $724,475
Are there any industry rules on how fast banks can move from NOD to NTS?
As IR said, this home went through the process fast… but there are many others that have taken quite a few months to years to move.
Homes that we looked at the early part of last year that were in default are just hitting the market now… even months after the bank (or other party) has taken ownership from auction.
And if lenders tighten credit standards even more, won’t that keep interest rates from rising in order to keep the “qualified” people borrowing?
Nice simian theme today… I feel at home.
“And if lenders tighten credit standards even more, won’t that keep interest rates from rising in order to keep the “qualified” people borrowing?”
That is entirely possible. Of course, that scenario also means demand is weak which isn’t positive for the market.
I’m sorry I keep going back to this refrain. But, it doesn’t matter what price you buy at…it only matters what price you sell at that matters.
If you buy now and live in your home in Irvine or the expensive OC coast for 20+ years you will likely make money within limits. That said, if you buy now and pay $1M for a nice home in Irvine what will happen IF you have to sell in the next 5-10 yrs??? You will likely be buying with 5% money or less leverage only to sell into 8% to 12% money in a decade.
Every 1 point rise in rates evaporates 10% purchasing power. If rates rise 5 points over the next decade (which the could easily do with inflation and a weakinging dollar) you could easily loose 50% of the purchasing power to those that will be bidding a decade from now!
There is no hurry to buy…just a slow grind lower in home prices in OC as rates rise.
This story has an result. It is nearly identical to what happened to Japan only worse…
The home will become an underperforming asset class for a decade or more. God forbid CA raises taxes on RE or on income or the feds reduce the tax deduction on interest paid on a home.
Somebody PLEASE make any case that prices will be higher a decade from now!!! If they are you only have one thing to hope for…and, that is a dramatic rise in incomes that exceeds the coming rise in rates….
Please- make the case!
My .02
BD
Hello?? PR or other please make the case for prices higher for Irvine or costal RE in a DECADE or more.
Unfortunately, too many think of RE is like a liquid investment that doesn’t involve serious leverage. Somebody, tell how prices will rise from here??
Ask yourself the following questions:
1. Do you think mortgage rates will rise over the next 5-10 years?
2. If they don’t rise then what does that tell you about the US economy and what is happening to the US consumer and unemployment?
3. If they do rise, how much will they rise from artificially low numbers put in place by the fed to help save debtors - and allow them to refinance leveraged purchases at lower rates?
4. Do you believe that rates have anything to do with prices? (rates have dropped consistently over the last 30 years allowing people to pay more for the same monthly payment)?
5. Do you believe that incomes are going to rise dramatically in SoCal?
6. If incomes do rise and unemployment shrinks in SoCal do you belive they will keep up with rising rates for leveraged purchases?
7. Do you believe in regression to mean? Regression around housing costs and ability to pay? Or costs of renting vs. owning? Or Housing prices in SoCal to the rest of the country? (it really doesn’t matter what you belive it happens always and is a statistical fact.
7. If only a few of these things happen what will the result on RE be in SoCal?
I know this is disappointing info. The good news is that people that bought and sold RE in Irvine and SoCal durring the housing bubble likely skipped 20 years of appreciation and captured it immediately (if you bought in 1999 and sold in 2005). These people will live a grand early retirement. Their properties earned more than they did in many instances on a yearly basis.
Just do the math and look forward. Housing in SoCal has been like MSFT stock! Growing wildly for many decades but, hits the limit of large numbers.
At best, we will see flat numbers for 5-20 years from her as rates rise and incomes slowly respond.
For instance, I’m getting ready to lease a condo in HB that costs me $2700/month but, at 4.5% rates it costs me 3600/month to own. I know this is an anectdote but, this is what you have in Irvine and desirable OC coast.
Just think! And PR and others just give me a business case for why prices will be higher a decade from now when adjusted for inflation?????
My .02
BD
Hah,, i love the monkeys.
I don’t think anyone can be assured that housing prices will increase. Currently the way home prices are moving, inventories are filling up and it seems that confidence is dropping faster than ever in our financial systems. Very little points to our housing market stabilizing this year, let alone rising home prices. I just hope that we have dissolved the bubble and are at more realistic valuations currently.