Ghost Estates: Twenty Percent of Ireland’s Houses Are Vacant

May 4th, 2010  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by E
2010-05-04 03:57 AM

“Fortunately, we have stringent building codes here, and most of the bubble era construction is very good; however, we certainly got much more than was required.”

Nonsense.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 08:43 AM

Take a look at the crap outside of CA.  The sacremento suburbs are going to be the most luxurious slums in the country.  That hard wood and granite in a 3000 sq. ft. McMansion tenament is going to last a long time.

People here say this will decrease the prices in areas like Irvine.  On the contrary it will make areas like Irvine even more premium to the alternatives.  If you disagree with me then move to Riverside.  If you aren’t willing to move to Riverside now you understand.

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2010-05-04 09:50 AM

Everyone has a price.

Everyone is willing to live in Riverside, just at different price points.  There is nothing price cannot fix.

Chuck

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 10:27 AM

I completely disagree.  Given what Riverside offers that vast majority of people with the money to consider buying in Irvine would never opt for Riverside.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-05-04 12:40 PM

Most of the readers of this blog would choose Irvine over Riverside. But your assertion that the Irvine premium goes up while other competing properties decline in value is beyond crazy. I recognize many of your comments are wishful thinking and justifying your own decision, but think for a moment about what you are saying.

If houses drop to $100K in Riverside or perhaps $300K in Lake Forest, you honestly believe that will cause prices to go up here in Irvine? Premiums are relative to alternatives, and the substitution effect is very real.

I can tell you from clients who have contacted us that a great many people would prefer Irvine, but when they see what they can get in Lake Forest or Tustin or some other nearby community they often buy there. The substitution effect works. It will continue to put pressure on rational buyers.

Now, if you want to argue that irrational people will continue to drive prices up in Irvine, I can’t argue with that. You are living proof.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-04 12:45 PM

I would choose Irvine over Riverside, but at the right price I would buy in Riverside.

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2010-05-04 01:17 PM

Having seen the kind of people that live in Irvine, and tasted of their bile, I think that it’s about sixes for me.

There are some beautiful estates in Riverside… just check out some of the Riverside Bubble blog’s entries and you’ll know what I mean.

For me, it’s the commute that makes it not yet viable.  But, if they’re giving away estates there, I’ll take one and live there.  How much are the tolls now?

Chuck

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2010-05-04 02:10 PM

A Castle in Corona? smile

http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/04/07/a-10-million-castle-in-corona/61665/

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 02:44 PM

The premium for high end goods will continue to increase as long as our economic growth continues to be based on bubbles.  This has been an undeniable trend.  The difference between the price of a Rolex watch and the cheapest watch continues to increase.

I agree that currently Tustin and Lake Forest are rational substitutes for Irvine.  The premium between those areas can increase just as the premium for a Prada bag can increase as wealth disparity increases.

Astute Observation by joe orange
2010-05-04 10:55 AM

Chuck has made a good point. The problem with Riverside is that the prices are still to high for people to move there.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 12:05 PM

All you need to do is line up your potential Riverside neighbor with your Irvine neighbor to change your mind.

If that doesn’t change your mind try lining up your childs Riverside classmates with his Irvine classmates.

This will change your mind before you even consider commuting or the weather difference.

There is no apples to apples comparison.  The premium is already far different than it was even 4 years ago.

Astute Observation by Eat that!
2010-05-04 12:12 PM

Seriously, you somehow think that people are dispecable based on the neighborhood they live in?

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 12:32 PM

It’s a self selecting process.  You can already buy a house in Riverside for the same cost as your Irvine cash down payment.  Really how much cheaper does it have to get?

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2010-05-04 01:13 PM

PR,

People who live in Irvine are just like the people who live in Riverside, only their zip codes are different.  To somehow deduce that people in Irvine are in some way superior to those in Riverside is hubris.

Riverside has some beautiful land and homes.  It seems like you say the worst home in Irvine is better than the best home in Riverside.  That’s being divorced from reality.

Chuck Ponzi

Astute Observation by brea
2010-05-04 08:30 PM

“If that doesn’t change your mind try lining up your childs Riverside classmates with his Irvine classmates.”

You are so out of touch here.  So let’s say you will buy in Riverside.  Will you go to one of the predominately minority neighborhoods and buy?  No.  You will buy in one of the neighborhoods that you feel comfortable and you would then feel comfortable with your schools.  In any city or neighborhood, if your kid wants to hang around with losers, that is because he has something in common with them.  You should stop talking about things you know nothing about.

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-05-04 10:27 PM

irvine kids have faster cars and better drugs. each generation increasingly moves away from its old culture frugality.  Germans, Chinese, you name it. I think i am pretty cheap, but grandpa puts me to shame.

The desire for younger generations to squander wealth is strong.  i think we will be forced to change in the future.

Astute Observation by Swiller
2010-05-05 06:41 AM

I agree with PR. It’s not about good humans and bad humans, it’s all about MONEY. Where there is money, there is good schools, good social upkeep, and usually a higher inclination to get further education.

The funny thing is, all the people saying “How dare you say something like that?” are the exact same people who would NEVER move into a piss poor community like most of the IE has become.

Our school system caters to the lowest common denominator (no kid left behind!!!) and do you think the kids in Irvine or the kids in IE will be at a higher education level for their age?

Like PR said, it is inevitable. Personally, I just see this as a manifestation of the two class, two party system I see being enacted in America.

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2010-05-05 09:18 AM

My education received in a rural Iowa public school is not that much different from the best schools in Irvine.  The motivation to do well is not different either.

It matters not how much money you have, but your access to quality education at a price you can afford.

many here want to invoke the china mirage.  Fine, look at china.  People there also gain excellent education while having little money.

Money does not rid one of stupidity.  One only need look at Irvine to confirm that simple truth.

Chuck Ponzi

Astute Observation by renter_forever
2010-05-04 11:31 AM

I have to agree with Planet here. I have been in Irvine for 7 years now renting.

The main reason I live here is the convenience. My work is just 10 min away and I can come home as I please to play with my newborn baby. All my friends are close by also.

I doubt I will move to riverside at any cost. For me life is too short to be spent commuting, I would rather spend that time with my Family even though there is a financial cost to it.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-04 12:48 PM

I would not commute either, but at the right price I would work in Riverside, or retire.  I do not know the names of the streets or nighborhoods, but there are some $mil neighborhoods there.  The neighborhood my mom grew up in, Casa Blanca, is not one of them and I do know the street names there.

Astute Observation by irvine_home_owner
2010-05-04 03:52 PM

Sorry… even at $1… I wouldn’t live in Riverside. It’s not just about price… it’s location too… closeness to friends, family, work and play.

I think some of you are not being honest here, homes in Riverside are already cheap enough to buy and pay less than it would to rent a 1BR in Irvine. Why haven’t you moved yet?

Upheaval of your life isn’t just about dollar per sft.

And while some may find Lake Forest and Tustin as a good substitute… I don’t think those areas are discounted enough. Summit Crest in Lake Forest has brand new 3000sft homes for $700k with no Mello Roos… yet we would probably rather buy a 2100sft motorcourt home in the dense 2010 HK Collection.

Astute Observation by Geotpf
2010-05-04 11:58 PM

This is very true.  There are some fairly high end, new neighborhoods in Riverside, such as Mission Grove, which would be indistiguishable from Irvine (other than larger lot sizes).  The schools in these newer areas are on par, or damned close to it, to Irvine’s (although I think this is due to students and their parents as opposed to anything actually being special with their schools-or Irvine’s, for that matter).  There are also some high end historical neighborhoods, such as Wood Streets and Victoria, that don’t exist in Irvine, but would not be that out of place in something like Beverly Hills.

There is also a “barrio” (Casa Blanca) and a “ghetto” (Eastside).  I would not want to live in either neighborhood for a wide variety of reasons.

I live in one of the neighborhoods that is in between the two extremes.

Riverside also has it’s own little “ghost estate”, Riverwalk Vista, on the corner of Indiana and La Sierra, across the street from the La Sierra Metrolink station.  They graded the lots, built the clubhouse and pool and a couple dozen houses, then boarded everything up and it’s just sat vacant for about three years now.

Astute Observation by Alan
2010-05-04 11:03 AM

I disagree about the durability of hardwood and granite. Even the highest quality (and maybe this stuff wasn’t really the best of the best) stains, chips, degrades when it’s not the owner and someone who worked long and hard to pay for it, who is using it. In some ways I think it is even more sensitive than cheap things, because who wants a nice, expensive granite counter top ... with a crack or a stain in it?n Or a hardwood floor with a deep scratch or burn marks?

Astute Observation by E
2010-05-04 02:34 PM

Ok Planet Stupidity.  You’ve finally proven beyond a shadow of a doubt what a moron you are.

Where the fuck did I say anything about Irvine?

That’s right.  Nowhere.

Quality construction isn’t about hardwood floors and granite countertops you fucking dolt.

Oh…BTW.  I have absolutely no desire to live in Irvine.  I read the blog because it’s funny.

Astute Observation by Frank
2010-05-04 03:20 PM

The bubble-era construction was done very, very poorly. I thought IR was joking when he wrote that. It was all done on the cheap with underskilled labor and Chinese drywall. Sure, there was some Pergo flooring and marble countertops put on, but the underlying construction is bad—bad materials, bad labor.

I do kind of understand your reasoning about truly premium areas maintaining or even increasing their premium. IR’s Brazil slum/deluxe apartment pic shows one example of how that might work. But I don’t believe that Irvine is “truly premium.” Hollywood hills? Sure, that’s for the truly rich. Irvine is for professional class workers, and without lending, the premium won’t hold. Honestly, even Rolex is not “truly premium.” If you want to see a premium watch, look at Patek Philippe or Jaeger-LeCoultre.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 04:00 PM

I have no desire to live in Irvine either.  I have no vested interest in Irvine.  I do recognize that a premium in Irvine exist.  I’m also fascinated by the trend of increasing premiums versus cheap substitutes.  When you have a true substitute you don’t have anyone complaining about the premium since they have already purchased the substitute and have moved on…

Astute Observation by JK
2010-05-04 09:30 PM

Actually the Chinese drywall problem was limited to most of the southeast corner of the US.

I don’t tend to agree with PR but if you look objectively I agree I would not move to Riverside.
(I also am not going to choose Irvine either). I live close to the coast because of the convenience of work but there are other factors.
The air quality, and I like the outdoors a lot, is better, the schools in general are better, and the crime rate is lower here than in Riverside. All factors that keep me here and leasing a smaller place than buying a Mcmansion inland.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 06:14 AM

The global bubbles have been much larger than the US housing bubble.  The Japanese asset bubble was significantly larger than the US.  This is exactly why the US is in such good shape.  Relative to everyone else the US is bad at blowing bubbles.

The US is in excellent position as there is only one pallatable way out for all of the politicians and banks around the world:  the inflation beast.  The politicians and central banks need not worry as they control the CPI calculation.  While inflation soars to evaporate the debt, the CPI will sit pretty at 3%.  Inflation will be worse in other countries.  The US bubble is smaller, the US has a lower debt to GDP ratio, and US debt is viewed as a safe haven.

Astute Observation by Yeppers
2010-05-04 06:25 AM

Yep, look at China. That country is in full bubble-mode with no end in sight.

Astute Observation by joe orange
2010-05-04 11:01 AM

There are a lot of countries with a debt to GDP ratio that is lower than the US. Mexico being one of them. But your right Japan is right next to Zimbabwe.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-04 12:51 PM

By far the largest bubble, interest rate swaps, is held by US institutions.  When interest rates in the US go up by more than 2 points, the interest rate swap OTC derivatives based on US debt will implode leaving US crrency as trash.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-04 12:57 PM

Sorry, 200 points and currency.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 01:11 PM

200 points LOL are you sure?  When do you expect the circular reasoning of your theory to occur?

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-04 01:39 PM

What do you think 200 points is?

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 01:47 PM

LOL the absurd arrogance makes it even better.

Are you willing to accept that if a mere 200 points led to the collapse of the currency the currency would have already collapsed?

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-04 01:59 PM

The notional value of outstanding OTC interest rate contracts as estimated by the BIS is about $500 trillion.  A 100 point change in interest rates would cause a transfer of $5 trillion, the vast majority of which would be in default.  The notional value of all the credit default swaps existant that brought the financial world to a cliff was less than $20 trillion in 2007.

Astute Observation by awgee
2010-05-04 02:03 PM

Darn, I almost forgot.  That $500 trillion of interest rate contracts are written on a total bond amount of $82.2 trillion.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-05-04 02:09 PM

You still didn’t answer the question.  Let me change the question for you:

If I were to flip a coin, heads the currency collapses, tales the currency does not collapse, doesn’t the currency collapse before my coin flip?

You are missing a key point in your logic.

Astute Observation by MalibuRenter
2010-05-04 05:42 PM

Gross or net?  The great majority of outstanding contracts net out.  Still, on a net basis, it’s large.

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-05-04 10:46 PM

what % of GDP is based on consumer spending? 70%?

at a certain point, no amount of CPI manipulation can hide soaring inflation, people see it at the store and gas station. 

inevitably rates will rise and what happens to consumer spending?
and what happens to the cost to service our debt when rates rise?

You are using rosy GDP numbers and assumed perpetual confidence to make a statement.

I do agree with some of your points however.

Astute Observation by scott
2010-05-04 07:55 AM

Not sure if you saw this article from The Atlantic entitled

“The Next Slum?
The subprime crisis is just the tip of the iceberg. Fundamental changes in American life may turn today’s McMansions into tomorrow’s tenements.


The Next Slum

Astute Observation by mike23w
2010-05-04 09:59 AM

thanks. interesting article.

Astute Observation by es
2010-05-04 09:03 AM

that “newer” graphic is hilarious and disgusting at the same time.  If Orange County needed a new flag, it should just be a picture of that lady.  Describes OC perfectly.

Astute Observation by Geoffrey Chaucer
2010-05-04 10:50 AM

All that roasted flesh - it’s like an overcooked version of the “turn key” graphic.

Astute Observation by Scrawny Kayaker
2010-05-05 10:04 PM

That’s not flesh, it’s skin over silicone.

Astute Observation by Alan
2010-05-04 11:12 AM

Like a granite counter top in an older tract house?

Astute Observation by Frank
2010-05-04 03:07 PM

...so to speak.

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-05-04 10:49 PM

don;t knock it ‘til you try it

Astute Observation by norcal
2010-05-04 03:33 PM

I thought that poor lady was a cancer victim with a double mastectomy.  I hope she’s alive and happy somewhere, no matter what your opinion of her looks may be.

Astute Observation by Patience
2010-05-04 09:23 AM

Turtle Rock Resiliency

I have some insight into the T Rock discussion from yesterday - I’ve been renting here for over 3 years. I was just informed by my landlady this weekend that her primary residence in Redlands is being foreclosed so she has to move back into my unit.

A neighbor had put down $20K on a property in another city just before the market fell. He realized he couldn’t sell his unit here for what he wanted so he forfeited the $20K and stayed put.

So since this neighborhood is older a lot of the places are paid for and these owners are staying put for now or using them as fallbacks. Granted, these are the cheapest units in the area.

So even though I have acted responsibly I’m personally getting screwed because I have to pay for a move I don’t want. I was planning to move only when I purchased a place. Now I have to move to another rental then move again when I purchase.

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2010-05-04 10:09 AM

Patience,

Such is renting.  The real advantage of renting is that you can move with little recourse.  The disadvantages are that you’re always priced at the margin and you don’t have control over whether you have to move or not after the contract term is up.

I’ve been renting for nearly 6 years after selling at what I thought was the bubble top.  2 times I chose when to move (new jobs), and the 3rd was induced by a out-of-touch landlord who wanted to raise the rent irrationally at the height of the biggest recession in history… it subsequently sat for 6 months and rented for less than what I was paying.  Nearly 2 years later, he’s back asking nearly the same rent I paid back in 2005.  That’s at least 5 years (and my landlord said since 2002 rents haven’t changed on that unit) of stagnant prices.

I’d rather be a renter for the forseeable future.  Even with all of the crap.  It’s still better than owning.

Chuck

Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-05-04 11:15 AM

I find that even the more hopeless landlords appreciate a renter who keeps the place clean and pays on time each month.

It helps if your landlord has had to deal with a non-paying flake. My current landlord is so happy to get the check on time that he leaves me alone.

Sure, it can end at any time, once the lease is up, but the feeling of being able to move without paying realtor commissions is one I cherish.

I may rent for the rest of my life.

Astute Observation by Soylent Green Is People
2010-05-04 09:50 AM

Doode. I saw that “Newer” picture some time ago and thought I had applied enough eye bleach to get rid of the image. Thanks for resurrecting that horror. I’ll get you back some day.

Scan your resources for any 15 year amortization loans and you’ll likely find some responsible homeowners out there. What would be sad is if there is a 15 year loan, plus the HELOC, that was spun out of control for same reasons everyone else had done.

My .02c

Soylent Green Is People.

Astute Observation by es
2010-05-04 09:53 AM

I was playing around with my hobby stuff and I dropped my soldering iron right on the webby part between my thumb and my index finger.  I got a nasty blister from the burn.  That’s *exactly* what her fake nasty boobs look like to me.

Astute Observation by newbie2008
2010-05-04 01:30 PM

It looks more like large welts.

TX, c.a. 1980’s, had a lot of knock downs on commerical RE building and some apartment building.  The upkeep cost and taxes were more than the rents.  The tax law depreciation schedule change did help either.  Liability was also an issue on the zero or near zero occupancy buildings.

On friend made very good on renovating crack houses.  Evicting the the druggies and dealers and renovating in the 1970’s to 1980’s.  He had the help of the police being in the family and mayor’s office.  Definately not for the timid.

Fire up them bulldozers.

freedomCM,
Aren’t the HOA liens wiped out on a FC?  Even if the HOA perfects the lein, they must also payoff the first and others upon sale of the property and the HOA is likely to be left with only a legal bill.

The paying HOA people will be forced to make up for the squatters and banksters.

LongBeach Renter,
HELOC adn HEW are just financing mechanism for terrorist on a shoe string.

Astute Observation by freedomCM
2010-05-04 10:20 AM

Reading yesterday’s TR post, I began to wonder what is going to happen to all the houses that are being squatted in with the bank’s approval, the shadow inventory.  Not when they will finally be taken back and sold, though.  But what will happen when they need a new roof?  When the water heater craps out?  when a pipe bursts?  A slab leak?

Are the squatters going to spend a few grand on repairs?

Also, in Irvine, what will happen when will the HOA fees not paid result in a lein by the HOA?  What will the bank do then?  Wont that force their hands?


Finally, in IR’s expenses, above, it looks as if the budget for repairs for this 30 year old house is $800/year.  How realistic is that?

Astute Observation by Long Beach Renter
2010-05-04 10:54 AM

Just read that the Times Square terrorist was also a HELOC abuser:

“In Shelton, Shahzad bought a house at 119 Long Hill Ave. in 2004 and took out a $218,400 mortgage from Chase Home Finance. In February 2009, he obtained a $65,000 home equity loan from Wachovia bank and seven months both banks began foreclosure.”

http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/FBI-searches-home-of-suspected-bomber-473341.php

Astute Observation by HydroCabron
2010-05-04 11:28 AM

I finally understand why everyone is so upset about terrorism: it can lead to HELOC abuse. Hell, if I were a HELOC abuser, I’d probably tell my family that I actually earned the money as a terrorist.

Terrorism is one thing, but HELOC abuse is another order of magnitude entirely. Shoot this piece of filth!

Astute Observation by Long Beach Renter
2010-05-04 04:41 PM

No, no, he was a HELOC abuser before he became a terrorist. The cause and effect goes the other way!  wink

Astute Observation by matt138
2010-05-04 10:54 PM

Newer.

should i try to clean the barf from my keyboard or just buy a new one?

Astute Observation by cynthia curran
2010-05-08 03:24 PM

Take Moreno Valley it appealed to a lot of hispanics and afro-ameicans who wanted to get out of the barrio or the ghetto in Orange County -Santa Ana-Anaheim or Los Angeles County. But, the roof fell out. One Mexican that moved there like it compared to Santa Ana -Anaheim where almost all people were hispanic and had higher crime.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main