Foreclosure filings expected to rise 20% in 2011

Jan 18th, 2011  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by octal77
2011-01-18 07:48 AM

“Foreclosures are expected to remain elevated throughout the year, pushing home prices down another 5 percent nationally before finally bottoming out.”

5% ?

bottoming out?

Is she kidding?

How is it possible that the REO pipeline could
be possibly cleared in 2011?

When REO’s rates are at historical levels,
then maybe we are at bottom.

Astute Observation by ENM
2011-01-18 07:59 AM

“Denial must be the driver of investment related reporting.”

No kidding. Has anyone noticed how often even the most discouraging economy news is presented in a positive, optimistic light?

Astute Observation by where are the REOs
2011-01-18 09:59 AM

Where is the surge of foreclosed properties?  One just hears about it but hardly sees them showing up in the for-sale inventory.  All are just regular equity sales.

Where I live (southern Cal), the inventory is very very low.  Sellers are very slow to lower prices cos they don’t have to.  I don’t sense the impending imploding of REOs at all.  It’s like I am living in a different world from the reported doom and glooms.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-01-18 10:20 AM

Banks are withholding inventory. The foreclosure filing, the first step in the process, is now starting to increase. After the filings come the foreclosures, and after the foreclosures come the REO. Banks can delay and withhold inventory at any step in the process. They will drag this process out as long as possible to ensure you pay the most possible for a property to make up for the losses on the stupid loans lenders made.

Astute Observation by sterling
2011-01-18 10:39 AM

If they paid their mortgage, they would not have this problem.

I agree that faulty loan docs should be contested, as well as fraud by the banks.

However, living rent free and squatting is not the best way to go is questionable at best.

Where is the sympathy for all the savers?

Deadbeats deserve what they get!

Astute Observation by cry baby
2011-01-18 11:06 AM

You’re just wishing you had the guts to default.

If you’re underwater this is actually a smart thing to do. Banks do it all the time silly.

Astute Observation by Swiller
2011-01-18 11:48 AM

All business will default if they deem it advantageous. NAR itself defaulted on a purchased property. Millionaires go BK, and then they are right back on top.

Enough bullsh1t games. Whats good for the aristicrats, is damn well good enough for me, and if the RULE OF LAW has degraded into such a mess that only ordinary workers like you and I have to comply, while the “others” do not; aka, police who consistantly and blatantly break the law, politicians who commit fraud and are “censured” rather than thrown in jail, banksters who commit fraud, lose investments, and are COVERED by the U.S. government instead of being thrown in mother f’ing jail, we have a problem Houston!

That being said, I really could give two sh1ts about anyone’s judgment. The saddest part of the story is the majority of americans are still ignorant schmucks who look to victimize the victims, and suck taint to their mammon masters as long as their precious Wall St. investments produce for THEM.

Personally, I hope the housing prices collapse, and America goes into a depression. We deserve it.

Astute Observation by gepetoh
2011-01-18 12:50 PM

Well, can’t say I disagree with you on anything you said.  The shame is that the general public has veered into the mentality that it is okay to not have to live up to one’s obligations because “someone” will bail you out.  So yeah, we deserve it.

Astute Observation by cry baby
2011-01-18 07:35 PM

@gepetoh

“live up to one’s obligations because “someone” will bail you out”


Can you let me know were the CHECKBOX is that says ‘you’re obligated’ to pay this back?

BTW… you can stop looking now. There isn’t such a checkbox. It is a brainwashing technique that you acquiesce to… sadly most of these things go unchecked.

There is a great movie on youtube about this called ‘esoteric agenda’... search for it. It is quite empowering indeed. Better than any horror movie you have ever seen.

Astute Observation by Swiller
2011-01-19 07:51 AM

@ geo…thanks, yes it’s sad, but this is the state of America. No one should have been “baild out”, no one, no homeowners, no banksters.

Living up to “one’s expectations”....what does that mean? You live according to what you can AFFORD, and hopefully, not go into debt unless it’s for a gain over the long period.

Banksters have the collateral of the home, it’s not my fault they allowed Wall St. to turn the housing market into a casino game, however, it *is* my loss, and apparantly according to the Federal Gov, your loss as well.

The whole thing stinks and my opinion, as well as how I conduct my life, has changed. RULE OF LAW indeed….yes, but which laws?

Astute Observation by sterling
2011-01-18 01:15 PM

Defaulting when you can pay doesn’t take guts, it takes loads of cowardice, though.

I am over 50% underwater on my Chicago home and defaulting is taking the easy way out.

Banks do it all the time.  Hmmmmm.  Let’s see, criminals kill all the time, but I am not going to kill anybody.

Defaulting when you can pay is reneging on a basic and powerful social contract.  Even though (some) banks may do it, doesn’t mean we should as well. 

SILLY!

Astute Observation by lowrydr310
2011-01-18 01:38 PM

I disagree with you. You don’t have any social contract - you have a contract with a bank that likely says they can take your home if you stop paying. Whether you choose to do so is up to you.

Everyone’s circumstances are different, but I don’t think that defaulting is “the easy way out.” Comparing a loan default to criminals killing is irrelevant; it’s not illegal to default on a loan.

I’m not really one to speak because I never put myself in such a situation, however you have to do what’s best for your life. If I was throwing good money after a depreciated asset, I would certainly take a step back and carefully evaluate my situation.

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx
2011-01-18 07:21 PM

I have been slowly changing my opinion about strategic defaulters.  While I still get infuriated with the people who are squatting in houses they are not paying for and gaming the system, I have no ill will toward folks who want to jingle mail their bank.

Just remember, all of that money that you “borrowed” from the bank was actually created out of thin air.  The funds that you received to buy the house were not taken from anyone and given to you.  The bank simply wrote some numbers into an account for you and now you get to slave away to make those payments plus interest on money that the bank never owned to begin with.  Why is it moral for a bank to collect interest on monies that it did not have to earn?  Why are banks allowed to counterfeit money and “lend” it to people?

The system is rigged so that the banks never lose.  Fate struck, the banks lost, and the government went rushing in to make sure that their friends never lost a penny.  How moral is that?

Astute Observation by no bottom
2011-01-18 11:02 AM

Bottom?

This elevator still has 10 more floors to go. Not going even close to clearing TODAY’S shadow inventory for 2-3 years. BTW, that ain’t including all those NEW defaults on the way.

There is a threshold of pain whereby the bleeding [underwater] home owner will finally just stop paying on debt gone bad. When these ‘paying’ home owners actually come to their senses there will be default foreclosure chaos. It will look like that National Geographic scene where the zebras are crossing the river.

Astute Observation by NateGeo
2011-01-18 11:10 PM

I believe that would be wildebeests grin

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 11:05 AM

The second wave is clearly here.

From Lansner’s blog:

Highlight’s of DataQuick’s December homebuying report for Orange County:

  * Orange County home prices finished 2010 at an 11-month low — with the median selling price falling to $410,000, lowest since May 2009.
  * That 19-month low is 5.7% below December 2009?s median price — ending a 15-month winning streak that dated to August 2009.
  * The first time the monthly median selling price hit $140,000 was June 2003
  * Orange County shoppers bought 2,739 homes — down 5.1% from a year ago and the sixth straight year-over-year drop.
  * 30,737 residences were sold in 2010, down 1% from the previous year.
    *More to come throughout the day!

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 11:09 AM

FYI ... Per DataQuick, Single-Family Median Home Price for The OC:

2010 Monthly/Weekly
$490,000 = Jan
$490,000 = Feb
$515,000 = Mar
$505,000 = Apr
$515,000 = May
$515,000 = Jun
$517,500 = Jul
$530,000 = Aug
$525,000 = Sep
$500,000 = Oct
$500,000 = Nov
$470,000 = Dec -Today’s median Epic FAIL!

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-01-18 01:08 PM

epic fail because?

Have you factored in seasonality? Have you factored in mix of housing selling since this is median price.

And even if you have, a Jan to Dec change of 4% is “EPIC FAIL”

lol. Not saying whether house prices will go up or go down. Just saying your data point to justify “EPIC FAIL” are clearly lacking.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 02:08 PM

When I refer to “epic fail”, I’m really talking about the Ponzi banking coming from the Fed, and the Ponzi accounting from the big banks.  All this was an attempt to push back gravity in asset prices, most notably, the real estate market.

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-01-18 02:18 PM

Ponzi banking from the Fed? What do these mean exactly? I know what the Fed is doing but how exactly is this a Ponzi scheme? They don’t need a greater fool theory to keep their mechanism going.

Also, if prices haven’t cratered to 1998 levels like everyone on this blog was predicting, then hasn’t the fact that prizes have gone down 4% in your “EPIC FAIL” point to an “EPIC SUCCESS” ....this EPIC FAIL is in light of seasonality (with dec always the worst month of the year) and without factoring for mix of homes determining the median.

It doesn’t have to go back up to pre-bust levels to be a EPIC FAIL. It just doesn’t need to down uncontrollably and thats seems like a “EPIC SUCCESS” in terms of THEIR STATED OBJECTIVE, whether or not you agree with their objective.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 02:40 PM

When the Federal Reserve Bank can swap a 5 year note with an accounting entry (as needed), and they can do this to the tune of a trillion (plus) dollars, that’s a ponzi scheme.

The only thing that has prevented a complete collapse in real estate has been this massive ponzi scheme at the Fed and the big banks.  Many of us housing bears, believe that the ponzi scheme tricks are presently being overwhelmed by the sheer number of defaults and the lack of credibility of a phony economy.

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-01-18 02:54 PM

from wiki:

A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to separate investors, not from any actual profit earned by the organization, but from their own money or money paid by subsequent investors.

You should use a different term.

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-01-18 03:08 PM


The only thing that has prevented a complete collapse in real estate has been this massive ponzi scheme at the Fed and the big banks.  Many of us housing bears, believe that the ponzi scheme tricks are presently being overwhelmed by the sheer number of defaults and the lack of credibility of a phony economy.

So prices are down 35% from your stats and the fed intervenes to slow down decline and you object because it proved “us bears” predictions wrong?

So you would have preferred the great depression again?

Why don’t “us bears” play out your scenario of a “complete collapse” in real estate and tell us what kind of world this looks like. Where are real estate prices? What is unemployment like? Is there political stability or do we set the ground work for WWIII?

Do enlighten us as to what this world looks like.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 03:28 PM

So you would have preferred the great depression again?

Great question.  Let me answer it this way ...

I would prefer the great depression II over a Japan style perpetual decline in asset prices at the cost of trillions of dollars thrown on the backs of our kids.

See, we did this ... WE ARE THE ONE’S THAT SHOULD PAY FOR IT!  NOT THE KIDS.  Just think about this ... we’ve spent trillions of dollars in an attempt to prevent a “depression”, and we’re still not out of the woods yet.  Who’s to say, we’re not in a depression now?  Ask an unemployed friend if we’re in a depression.  WTF is a “depression”?

We are going to be the first generation in US history to pass on to the next, a lower standard of living.  It’s simply not fair.  We’re stealing!

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-01-18 03:41 PM

lol. trillions thrown on the backs of our children from the bail out? Really?

Why don’t you show us how much debt was created by the fed exactly. The trillions of debt you speak of is being created by social security, medicare and common defense that go up every year when tax revenues are down due to a wtf is depression or recession.

So you think given the choice, the japanese would prefer the great depression and subsequent WWII and hardship over the last 10 years of their terrible economy where they are still are one of the richest nations in the world per capita huh?

Jeez, have some perspective.


Careful what you wish for.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 04:01 PM

Oh I do have perspective!  We don’t even know what’s going to happen in real terms with our economy.  Remember, we’re by no means out of the woods, however, we’ve spent trillions in an attempt to prop-up asset prices.

Remember what happened last May when the Dow dropped 1,000 points in a matter of minutes, only to come raging back within the hour.  This is the kind of BS that happens when markets are being manipulated.

It’s NOT gonna work.

Astute Observation by cry baby
2011-01-18 07:38 PM

@lee
c
Please go to youtube and search for ‘debt as money’ then search for ‘the secret of oz’....

People are waking up to the mess… the time is NOW.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 02:28 PM

The median ASKING price:

Housing bubble pops

2006
Oct ~ $667,200
Nov ~ $660,750
Dec ~ $651,225

2007
Oct ~ $599,379
Nov ~ $588,475
Dec ~ $573,580

2008
Oct ~ $467,850
Nov ~ $455,774
Dec ~ $444,087

Ponzi scheme banking and accounting take hold

2009
Oct ~ $456,856
Nov ~ $449,760
Dec ~ $458,475

Ponzi scheme banking and accounting FAIL

2010
Oct ~ $447,000
Nov ~ $432,600
Dec ~ $423,722

Source ~ Housing Tracker

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-01-18 02:50 PM

So lets see.

From 2006 to 2007, Dec to Dec, 12% drop. From 2007 to 2008, 23% drop again. “Ponzi” scheme implemented and price go UP from 2008, to 2009 and then in 2010, prices have come down 5% from the 2008 PRE Ponzi Scheme days.

double digit drop, double digit drop, then up then single digit drop.

yes, it looks like an EPIC, I mean EPIC, fail according to this….they stop rapid decline in asset prices or deflation as per their own objective. EPIC FAIL!

Obviously if you are statement is going to be that prices will continue to fall further and just as fast as it did in 2006 and 2007, then it will turn into an EPIC FAIL.

But NOTHING you have provided so far points to a failed policy against their stated objective.

not a statement of whether fed should have or shouldn’t have…nor a statement of FED causality or even FED correlation but your EPIC FAIL statements are EPIC UNSUPPORTED by your own data points.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-01-18 03:17 PM

I just don’t have the energy to argue.

Here’s what matters!  From 2005 until late 2007, many people said there was no such thing as a housing bubble.  Some insisting that it was impossible for prices to decline.  They were proven wrong.  When 2008 started, many housing bears thought it would get a lot worse (me being one), because we never anticipated that The Federal Reserve with the US govt would blatantly throw capitalism out the door, in an attempt to manipulate the economy.

The big question is, how/why did so many bears miss the govt/Fed ability to manipulate the economy on such a vast level?  Answer ~ Because we’ve NEVER seen the govt/Fed take on these actions before.  This has been unprecedented, and it’s mocked our once free markets, and jaded many American’s!

Astute Observation by Perspective
2011-01-18 03:59 PM

I remember commenting on this blog in 2007 that I would expect our government to do everything possible to arrest a serious decline in housing prices (because of the negative feedback loop the decline would create).  Many shot-back that there was not much they could do; that they don’t “control” interest rates and that was really their only tool.  I think we’re all shocked at the many tools they have and have used.

There’s still the tool of mass-refinancing through the agencies regardless of LTV with the prospect of adding underwater portions to the end of a loan (balloons).

We’ll see…

Astute Observation by FreedomCM
2011-01-18 11:07 AM

(IR-your cost accounting of “hidden equity” assumes that prices remain steady nominally.  do you really think this is likely?)


only $3k/month to “own” this tiny 3/2 that hasn’t been updated since Nixon? 

whadda bargain!

Astute Observation by ltokuda
2011-01-19 02:58 PM

I see that 6 delamesa is off the market now.  Any info on what happened?  Did it get an all cash offer?

Astute Observation by WTF Finance
2011-01-25 11:54 PM

Foreclosure filings will only increase if the banks actually foreclose. There’s no doubt that the number of people defaulting on their mortgages increases though. But thanks to accounting regulations everything is possible.

You can read about Non-Foreclosure Crisis

http://www.wtffinance.com/2011/01/the-non-foreclosure-crisis-2/

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main