Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Lee Campbell on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Kelja on Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Recent Posts
- Open House Review: 34 Redwood Tree Lane
- Uncovering the History of the Secret Garden
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Investors Are Busy in Irvine’s Low-End Housing Market
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $199,900 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $398,900 :: 191 Lockford, Irvine CA, 92602
- $750,000 :: 69 Lakeview 6, Irvine CA, 92604
Finally! (Update on the Simi Valley psycho couple). Sorry, slightly off topic.
http://www.vcstar.com/news/2010/oct/26/simi-family-locked-out-of-their-foreclosed-home/
So the new owner lost their prospective buyer. I think Conejo Capital Partners may have a lawsuit against Michael “Were gonna sue everybody…” Pines.
At the very least, shouldn’t he get disbarred for advising his clients to commit a felony.
I had the same question. Why is this lawyer being allowed to practice some form of alternate universe law?
He even claimed that he was going to have armed people escort the family back to break into the house again. LOL. That’s not a dumb idea at all! I’m sure the cops will see your guns and quiver in their boots!
re: the article. who the f would rent a house to these people? what’s their FICO? 390?
Why does the mainstream press continue to categorize the foreclosure problem as one of ‘sloppy’ paperwork?
They broke laws and knew they were breaking laws - it was fraud. How come so few actual notes are turning up? Note, note, where’s the note? They were burned, shredded or buried (or all three). The notes will not be found.
Yes, the borrower who isn’t paying should be foreclosed on. But, by whom? Who actually is in possession of the note?
I am assuming that you aren’t a lawyer. Or, in any event, you aren’t familiar with foreclosures in California.
You do not need possession of the note to effect a lawful non-judicial foreclosure in California. In fact, one attorney who was behind this movement lost his law license after filing thousands of these lawsuits in California. He also settled with the state of California by agreeing to pay over $1 million dollars in restitution to defaulted borrowers who paid him.
I was a lawyer representing servicers and lenders in many of these lawsuits that were filed against my clients. I will tell you that we had EVERY SINGLE NOTE in our possession in these cases in the event some judge actually said that we had to “produce the note.” But, that is not the law and we were NEVER, not one time, required to “produce the note.”
This is a dead movement. The argument has shifted to one of assignments (this is why the paperwork is an issue). This argument will also fail for these defaulted borrowers. At best for these defaulted borrowers, it will simply delay lawful foreclosures.
I am genuinely curious.
If you are not required to produce the paperwork… exactly what stops someone from foreclosing on property for which they do not hold the mortgage.
I mean, if I don’t have to show documentation that I’m the person owed money on the mortgage on the property… this seems like a serious problem. Even if I could prove that the mortgage isn’t being paid, if I don’t hold the mortgage, I certainly shouldn’t be allowed to take possession of the property.
Does this all rest on the supposed “good faith” of bankers not to make claims related to mortgages that they don’t hold?
Well for all of this obvious “fraud” that ignited the nation’s righteous indignation a couple of weeks ago - it sure is becoming less and less of a story these days. You know the media is out there looking for victims to create a great sensational story. It seems that they sure aren’t finding a whole lot…
So what if the paperwork was “robosigned” - it doesn’t change the fact that you stopped paying your damn mortgage 2 years ago.
I am tired of hearing about this non-issue. Let the foreclosures resume immediately. Hire more robosigners and get these people out of our houses.
“Hire more robosigners and get these people out of our houses.”
Love it.
10,000 lawyers at the bottom of the sea. LOVE IT!!! Make it all of them in the world.
You are absolutely right - I am not a lawyer. But what happens if all the notes were purposely destroyed?
I also think the foreclosure process will be drawn out even further than it already is. And, what will be the repercussions of that? I think it will be bad for the market - it introduces more uncertainty on top of what is already out there.
Buyers will become more reluctant. More people will do strategic defaults (after all, they can stay in their homes for years and not pay).
And all those holders of the securitized mortgages will attempt to put those back to the banks.
One thing for sure, it good for your business!
There are legal procedures and mechanisms in place in the event that a note is lost or destroyed. It’s an easy fix. But again, I never handled a case where we didn’t have possession of the note and I handled a lot of cases.
Based on what you have stated, I’m not sure what grounds there are for your statement that “all of the holders of the securitized mortgages will attempt to put those back to the banks.” Simply because there are delays in foreclosures and uncertainty in real estate markets?
But you are right, this is good for the legal business right now.
What if it is found that those foreclosing have doctored the notes or have destroyed them on purpose?
Explain to me what a “doctored note” is. The first thing that comes to mind is that BOA sees that AZDavidPhx paid cash for his place. They didn’t like that so they conjured up a mortgage note and foreclosed him in order to steal his property.
Is that what you are claiming the banks are up to?
Or are you just playing games with semantics? The debtor signs the note and the bank destroys it. So what? That does not entitle Joe Deadbeat to stop paying the loan. The bank then reconstructs the note. OOOOOO! Scandalous!
This “Show Me The Note” garbage reminds me of the old miranda rights myth that went something along the line of if the police did not read you your rights then you cannot be convicted of a crime. The criminal sitting in court admitting that he committed the crime but arguing that his rights were not read to him so he should be free to go.
Same difference, the house debtors admitting that they are in default but claiming they should not be evicted because the original note was not read to them.
And all these sheeple going along with this nonsense because they are so blinded by their banker-hatred.
Ridiculous.
What incentive would drive a bank to destroy a note? As in, what do the bank get in return for making a note “disappear?” I cant think of a good reason.
Much more painful in Spain where bankruptcy doesn’t wipe out mortgage debt, and banks can tack on any fees, charges, and interest they like and garnish your income forever.
In Spain, Homes Are Taken but Debt Stays
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/world/europe/28spain.html?pagewanted=1&hp;
Mortgage debt in Spain is like student loan debt here - it’s yours, forever!
I feel sorry for the 23 year old jobless daughter who co-signed as guarantor for her Dad’s apartment loan. Her life is ruined now.
Can she move to Portugal, France or Italy to avoid the debt and start over? Or will the debt follow her if she moves to another EU nation?
How barbaric! How are these folks supposed to borrow and spend money on things they cannot aford when they are forced to pay it all back? This is crazy!
http://realestate.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=25923795>1=35010
“The average length of time from default to eviction is 400 days in California, Fredman says.”
I’m waiting for a website to come along that will take your zip code and lender and give you “Average Squatting Time” based on your situation. The real time AST could help individuals decide whether or not to squat. Advertisement space on the site could be sold to attornies, BMW dealerships and RV dealerships.
That’s a reasonable business idea. You also want to buy that shiny new car before your credit is shot (because you won’t be able to after a couple missed payments, but also, to help rebuild your credit score faster).
What’s the average eviction time for renters? Couple months?
Depends on the jurisdiction. Local laws and ordinances apply. In Chicago, it will almost certainly take at least 4 months if the lessor moves on the situation very quickly and follows procedure to the letter, and evictions cannot take place during the deep winter months, particularly if children, elders, or disabled or ill people are involved.
In St. Louis, it took perhaps 3 months at the most for non-payment.
Best to know your local rental laws very well if you want to play landlord with your underwater house. A procedural error can result in the tenant poaching an entire year’s free housing off you, or suing you for a largish sum of money. Any landlord who tries to negotiate this situation without competent legal assistance is suicidal.
“Anyone who is not already over-indebted, has a job, and has good credit can borrow plenty.”
I. R. I am one who meets those criteria, but I just don’t want to borrow again. After 2 1/2 years of readership, I am on a continuous path of de-leveraging that will last several more years. I often observe here that my generation is held liable for much of this mess, but I am of the opinion that we do not represent the majority of the HELOC abusers. That said, I beleive that my generation has committed some dreadful errors in planning (not planning) for retirement, bordering on magical thinking. By the simple act of long term de-leveraging, I am keeping a portion of my income out of the economy. Aggressive savings takes more out.
Had I not sipped some Kool-Aid earlier, I wouldn’t be engaged in such a thrifty regime now. What saved me was never exceeding a 50% LTV at any time. Better late than never.
S.B.
S:
In my experience, each and every one of the heloc abusers I’ve personally met is a member of your generation.
Every one.
From paying their kids’ student loans and college costs (rather than require their kids to work through school or earn grants) to plastic surgery to spa vacations to Escalades or tricked-out Explosions with spinner rims to $100k per year living expenses to continue the facade despite a job loss - yep - your generation did it all.
It was as though these people were either tempting fate or trying to establish their own reality….very sad and I fear for my country.
Way things are going, it might be possible to get foreclosed on, have your good credit ruined but then have your credit repaired by the time you’re kicked out of your own house.
Made me laugh
Hee-hee!
Banks make money by lending it. If there is a lack of customers with sufficiently high scores, the banks will adjust their standards downward accordingly. If nearly everyone has garbage credit, then garbage is the new normal, and will be deemed creditworthy.
I believe what you propose in jest will actually be the case. Borrowers more than 2 years out of foreclosure will be eligible for decent rates.
Yes, with each new loan, the banks are indeed literally making money ( out of thin air ). Why aren’t the lawyers for these defaulters barking up the “unlawful consideration” tree?
The entire real estate “lending” game now is all about what the banks can dump on the taxpayer if things don’t work out. If too many people have bad credit scores then the tax payer will have to insure more “loans”. The Government shall step right up and do so for the sake of “helping” us continue to prop up prices.
I suppose at some point nobody will want to use our currency, but let future administrations deal with that problem when the time comes.
“That is one of the first acknowledgments of the plight of new buyers I have seen in the media. Everyone is so focused on helping out the deadbeats being foreclosed on that we forget that a new buyer—a buyer willing to pay the mortgage—is waiting to move in to their new home. The idea that delinquent borrowers should have their debts forgiven because of a procedural error is ridiculous.”
Hey, that is definitely a move in the right direction!
How about a Class action against the banks who resisted (most of them!) the market correction to allow buyers to buy a house at a fair price by withholding inventory from the market? I’m sure will be plenty of victims, I’m one! IR, you have hundreds of examples of properties with troubled mortgages that are not timely foreclosed on, aren’t you?! Any lawyers out there want to tackle a case like that?
Where were you when we were discussing about knife catching will result in deep and serious personal financial losses? Because of your knife catching action, the market stays at the same elevated WTF level. Could we sue you and the knife catchers for keeping the market at such elevated WTF level?
Regret is not an excuse.
Dude,
WTF are you talking about?
Can’t you read?
I sad I’m a victim because I don’t want to buy a house at the WTF price and banks prevent prices from coming down! I’ve been renting since 2004 and patiently waiting for the unavoidable correction. Now, thanks to amend-extend-pretend by the banks and all this foreclosure-gate bulls…t lately, who knows how much longer this will drag. What knife catching action are you talking about? I could buy the house I rent in Irvine for cash - but I refuse, because of the above…. So, thanks for adding insult to the injury!
Now the next level down begins to appear. Newport Coast, Laguna, and anything coastal - oh and Irvine are now slowly experiencing what took only months to happen in other areas. These area owners have more resources and will hold on longer and endure more pain in general. Prices may ‘spike’ lower but, are more likely to experience a slow grind lower to a true equilibrium with income and savings.
I’ve said it before. This is the worst time to buy a house in our area in 100 years. You can buy now and get an artificially low rate of 4.25% on a 30 year fixed only to try and sell 10 years from now to someone who has to buy with a 7.5% 30 yr fixed. This will take 30% plus of purchasing power and carrying costs. You will loose money after a decade of owning! Don’t believe it??? Look at Japan! We are becoming Japan… 25 years of slowly depreciating RE.
Tell me why it’s not so…
BD
I can’t say whether it is so or not, but there is a notable difference between the U.S. and Japan. We are experiencing population growth—and in particular, population growth of young people.
While we have our own demographic mess coming, it is much less severe than Japan’s.
Our population-growth ponzi scheme may work for many more decades before leaving some (potentially as-yet unborn) generation holding the empty bag.
Or it may all blow up in the next couple of decades if we do something to make the U.S. an undesirable place for immigrants. (Since our birth rate isn’t high enough even to keep a constant population, let alone a growing one).
Not sure if this was posted earlier but you can now get title insurance on REOs based on CR’s post:
REO Title Insurance
Go get your REOs while the price is hot
I’m definitely an amateur here, since I was still in school the last time buying property made a lick of sense…
But, the article says that people will be able to buy title insurance on these properties… but does title insurance routinely protect against all possible problems? Or are there exceptions, like in all of the other types of insurance that I carry?
Also, limitations? Is the coverage just for purchase price? Would it also cover the cost of any legal action?
The Robo-Signing Terminator stuff was cute, IR.