For What It’s Worth

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by John
2008-12-10 05:21 AM

As long as the sponsored posts are identified as such, I think it’s a fine idea.  After all, if you can’t monetize your site, what’s the point?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-12-10 07:44 AM

Yes, we would clearly identify each post as a sponsored post.

It is funny that we at the IHB are so concerned about monetization. Zovall started this site as a public service, and I have always tried to give freely to the IHB community. There is a purity of purpose that none of us want to lose. I think we all recognize that if we try to become commercial, we will lose what makes the IHB special.

Astute Observation by Forbear
2008-12-10 06:16 AM

IR,

I like the idea of profiling properties outside of Irvine; you deserve some financial reward for your service.  I would especially like seeing properties in the South Huntington Beach area, after living/renting in Irvine for 5 of the last 8 years we’ve decided it won’t be where we buy.  I’ve worked in Irvine for the last 17 years and it’s not as nice as it once was.

“The high end of the market is still in denial.”

Regarding your chart today, where do you think the mid range is?  Some colleagues of mine are seriously considering 9 Pinebrook in Irvine, they seen a flattening of prices on Zillow and of course figure this is bottom.

Astute Observation by AbroadThankGod
2008-12-10 06:53 AM

IR,

Just clearly identify the sponsored posts and I’m all for it. You’ve put a lot of time, hard work and diligence into this site. As long as you are upfront about what you do, you won’t lose any credibility. You’ve earned our trust.

Astute Observation by Mikee
2008-12-10 06:57 AM

Before I saw your analysis, I thought - “you could probably get 1,750 for this place, which should be a net positive”.
Then I saw the association fees…$370!!
WTF!?!  Probalby because this is a 1983 condo and there needs to be some capital improvements, but wow!
I am really glad I never bought the “starter” condo and straight for an old bungalow as a starter.  $370 just about kills any cost/benefit analysis on this one.

Astute Observation by buster
2008-12-10 01:21 PM

I rented in this complex until a few months ago and was paying $1,775/mo.  And that was low compared to many neighbors.  These are actually really nice and it’s kept up very well.  They put on new roofs, new parking lot, new fences and revamped all the landscaping just in the five years I rented there.

The complex boarders IVC, lots of open space, no traffic.  Great place for $1,775/mo. Wish I was still living there but changed jobs.  At $2,000 per month to own, I’d do it but not if I had to plop $54,000 (which I don’t have) as a down payment.

Astute Observation by Priced_Out_IT_Guy
2008-12-10 04:23 PM

I disagree that $1775 is FMV for this condo. Perhaps a year or two ago, but not today. Rents are falling, I know mine did.

I just leased an equivalent apartment, same sq ft. for $375 less plus a free month not more than two blocks away in a nice area. Since this place has an extra bath its worth maybe $75/mo more because more people are willing to rent if they get their own bath.

Someone would jump on this place for $1475-$1500 max assuming things don’t deteriorate much more.

If it was next door to UCI it could fetch more, but IVC is just a community college. More than half of the people who go to IVC go at night. The majority that go during the day are younger students living at home.

Astute Observation by Priced_Out_IT_Guy
2008-12-10 04:25 PM

“I just leased an equivalent apartment”

meant to say

“I just leased an equivalent apartment as the feature property”

Astute Observation by maureen
2008-12-10 07:01 AM

I would be fine with this idea IR.  A lot of people on this blog are looking at other cities and besides, you more than deserve the extra income.

Astute Observation by Texas Triffid Ranch
2008-12-10 07:05 AM

Okay, this description was just plain lazy.  C’mon, realtors:  either follow proper capitalization rules or capitalize every blasted word.  This just looks like something written with a cell phone.

Astute Observation by ocrenter
2008-12-10 07:42 AM

Sounds like a great idea IR! You deserve it!  Writing blogs daily takes much time and research.  You should have some compensation.  Also, it would be nice to actually see properties that would cashflow positive. I wonder how long it will take to see more of that in Irvine!

Astute Observation by scott
2008-12-10 07:59 AM

I think it would be a great idea to apply the analytics on this site to other markets and would be valuable.

Astute Observation by Belle Waring
2008-12-10 08:02 AM

as a reader who mostly lurks, I think you deserve some money for all the time and analysis you’ve put in…and I’ve actually been curious to see your skills applied to an area other than the OC. seems like a fine idea.

Astute Observation by No_Such_Reality
2008-12-10 08:45 AM

Showing properties outside the area would be good.  Are we talking about OC/Riverside properties?  I would assume so or there’s no likely target market for the Realtor to sponsor.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya
2008-12-10 08:49 AM

Property taxes are overstated on your calc.  Monthly tax burden with special assessments, which are quite low due to the age of the unit, would be around $235 per month at list price.  That’s $110 lower per month than the calculation depicts.

I am assuming that you left off taxation on the lost income from down payment also so that line item is overstated as well.  For an owner occupant, a tax-effected rate of 3% would probably be more appropriate, so the forgone income on down payment is around $140 instead.  This overstates the monthly cost by around $90.

So instead of a cost of $2007 per month it is probably more like $1807.  If it costs less than the $229 per month you have to maintain the unit, it would likely be below rental parity for the owner-occupant. 

Do you really think also $3K per year for a unit such as this is appropriate for maintenance?  On these apartment style units the roofing and exterior paint are covered by association typically.  There is no landscape to maintain.  The only material things to maintain are the flooring, appliances and AC/heater.  Can someone really spend the equivalent of $3K per year on those things?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-12-10 09:15 AM

Those are all good points. I would note that the tax savings is probably also exaggerated by $200 per month given the income level of an owner occupant.

The maintenance costs would probably be lower for an owner occupant because they would take care of the place. A landlord would be wise to assume they will need to replace carpets and repair damages when a renter leaves.

I don’t know if there are any Mello Roos still applicable to this property, so the special assessments might be either too high or too low.

Astute Observation by buster
2008-12-10 01:28 PM

As posted above, I rented there and knew the owner.  No Mello Roos, association covers EVERYTHING including insurance (and earthquake insurance).  When we moved in, he threw in some paint and that was it.  The place had (fake) hardwood floors and granite counters, so there was nothing else to do. 

BTW, we had some termites and the association even came in and took care of that.  I think they do everything.  If I still lived in the area, I’d buy it (or I’d buy my the downstairs unit I lived in w/ a 500sq patio) if I could work a deal for 10% off the price and only 10% down.  That gets real close to rental parity.

Astute Observation by tlc8386
2008-12-10 06:19 PM

Well I look at this property another way what will it appreciate to? It’s already pretty old if it has no mello roos. So all you are doing is really paying off a loan and your money is not earning anything. And the older a property gets less value as it ages.
This is one area many may have not looked at appreciation is lost now for quit sometime because of the age of some of these places. Sure it’s nice to own something but if you cannot make it better (fixing it up and getting that money back ) than it’s not worth buying from my investment point of view. Take the money and buy stocks (the right ones of course).

Or buy yourself a old home fix it up or tear it down. These old townhouses are worth much less in resale but for rental usage you can take off depreciation and that is about the only reason to own this or any old property. JMO—

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-12-10 09:18 AM

Does anyone seriously think the foreclosure problems are behind us or that the problem is overstated?

Forecast: 8 Million Homes Could Foreclose in Coming Years

http://www.housingwire.com/2008/12/10/forecast-8-million-homes-to-foreclose-in-coming-years/

Astute Observation by ConsiderAgain
2008-12-10 11:22 AM

“Does anyone seriously think the foreclosure problems are behind us or that the problem is overstated?”

No chance, either here or elsewhere.  Here is a notable story from Denver:

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/dec/10/november-home-sales-in-metro-area-worst-on/

Astute Observation by cosmo kramer
2008-12-10 11:54 AM

Another one.  They’re “surprised.?”  Really?

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0847256620081208

Astute Observation by SacRenter
2008-12-10 09:51 AM

I actually like the idea of seeing some properties profiled that are at rental parity or lower.  As someone who is currently renting and would like to buy when it makes sense, I value the exercise of running the numbers.  While it’s entertaining to see the extreme disconnect it is very helpful to see examples where it does make sense.

My two cents - whether it’s sponsored or not I’m looking forward to seeing the pro-purchase posts.  If you can make some money off of them then more power to you.  You’ve consistently been open and honest with us and the integrity with which you and Zovall have managed this blog to date speaks well for you both.

Astute Observation by Purplehaze
2008-12-10 09:54 AM

Hey IR,

Thank you for inviting our opinions about the sponsorship opportunity. I definitely support you on this one. Irvinehousingblog has come a long way and opportunities like these will only embellish the rational view points promoted by this blog; it is then likely that more people will shed denial and face up to reality.

Regards,
PH

Astute Observation by irsx02
2008-12-10 10:05 AM

IR,
  As a long time silent lurker, I’m all for the weekend advertisements.  You’ve done a great service with IHB and deserve some of its rewards.  I always intuitively knew prices were high, but through your site I now have to vocabulary to describe why its too high.  And the insight that goes with it too.
  I would recommend to follow some advertising ground rules though (and everyone here should contribute.) Otherwise, soon you’ll find yourself chasing some advertising dollar kool-aid.

  1.  Clearly mark that this is advertisement.

  2.  Continue with your deep analysis on why this would make a good rental property.  I learned a lot through your “rent vs buy” analysis.  Now I would like to see details on why this is a good investment.

  3.  The day you push a POS place that even a poor college kid wouldn’t live in, regardless of how profitable the investment may be, you’ve jump the shark.  Don’t jump the shark.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-12-10 10:13 AM

“3.  The day you push a POS place that even a poor college kid wouldn’t live in, regardless of how profitable the investment may be, you’ve jump the shark.  Don’t jump the shark.”

Unfortunately, this is the very type of property trading at or below rental parity at the moment in most markets.

Astute Observation by irsx02
2008-12-10 10:46 AM

IR,
  I use to live in a city known as Gun Point.  And a good college friend of mine live in a place he called “crackhouse”  Poor college kids don’t have the same standards as of many of your readers.  But if the places profiled can’t pass the “poor college kid (with poor parents) wouldn’t live here” test, then there’s some problems.

Astute Observation by Fermi Pyle
2008-12-10 05:19 PM

In Irvine the bad area is known as “Gunne Pointe” and by HOA rules all guns must be stainless.

Astute Observation by Bitter Renter
2008-12-10 09:19 PM

LOL.  LOL

IR, the plan sounds like a good idea to me, assuming you won’t have trade in your objectivity for profits when analyzing these properties.  Irvine is not the only place in O.C. I’m considering buying, so it’ll be good to get your analysis on other areas as well.  And the daily similar Irvine properties can get a little monotonous, so it’ll be good to have these non-Irvine properties to spice things up.

Astute Observation by Alan
2008-12-10 10:07 AM

I think it is a great idea, if done with moderation (as in only on the weekends). It is much easier and way too tempting to mock overpriced mediocrity, then to identify and analyse something that is worth the money. And if restricted to Irvine, there just isn’t any of that to find for now. I would like to see such posts.

Astute Observation by movingaround
2008-12-10 10:19 AM

Go for it - aside from the fact that I totally support the IHB group getting some money - I think I would enjoy reading information on some housing outside of Irvine.  Personally I would love to see this extended to other areas of the country.  I feel like we are getting to the point where some areas of the country have started to find a bottom - while Irvine is still in la la land a bit.  It would be interesting to get a fuller perspective on things as we head in to the next few years!

Astute Observation by phil
2008-12-10 10:38 AM

I think your idea is a win-win.  There may actually be people on this site who would consider properties outside of Irvine if the location was decent and the price was right.  This benefits the readers and the Realtor.

Astute Observation by Woodbury Renter
2008-12-10 10:53 AM

I think receiving money from a realtor to finance the work on this site is officially known as “coming full circle”.

It is honorable to seek the concurrence of your long time members before accepting this offer.  Combined with the fact that the sponsorship will be clearly revealed will make this palatable to most.  After all, we can’t wait forever for Irvine properties to actually reach rental parity or a reasonable income multiple.

If there are IE properties that investors should consider fine, but I think most people on this blog would never live there anyway.  What we are anxiously awaiting is an Irvine, Laguna Niguel, CDM, HB or even Lake Forest property that is at parity.

Astute Observation by zoiks
2008-12-10 11:23 AM

“a realtor that would like us to profile properties outside of Irvine and provide our unbiased opinion of the investment potential.”

Unbiased - LOL

Astute Observation by zoiks
2008-12-10 11:38 AM

You guys are sick. $275k for this thing is way overpriced. It’s only 1000 sqft! You could build it for less than $150k. Any land title that comes with it is near worthless.

Do you guys even realize what you’re saying?

For the median household in Irvine, gross income = $84000, monthly gross = $7000.

Even $1800 rent represents 26% of gross income for this median family, barely under the 28% guideline.

So, a median Irvine household (including dual earner families) deserves to rent a less than 1000 sqft 2 bedroom POS boxshack with a carport? Are you kidding me? Keep dreaming. $1800-$2000 is too much for rent of this place, even if *today’s* renters are crazy enough to pay it.

Astute Observation by freedomCM
2008-12-10 02:37 PM

Right on zoiks!

$1750 rent, while it may be going now, is outrageous for a 25 year old attached with no garage, and it won’t last.  Even two IVC students aren’t going to pay $875 plus utilities each to live here.  So you get 4 students?

A small house (2bd/2ba/2g) next to me, 4 blocks from the beach in HB, is looking for tenants at $1900, and I suspect it will drop some before it gets rented.

Would you rather live 2 blocks from IVC, or 2 blocks from the beach?

Astute Observation by LC
2008-12-10 10:00 PM

What? Are they high? I know that it is up only one flight of stairs, Mr. Realtor Man. I said high, as in loaded, zonkers, zoinks, flip city.

Astute Observation by trrenter
2008-12-10 11:55 AM

IR,

On the Psychology of the Bubble the time line needs to be extended and some new indicators need to be added.

There will be flat periods or slight bumps upward every time a new “hope for homeowner” plan is announced.  So most recently it the indicator would be Fannie and Freddie put a moratorium on foreclosures.  Prior to that there would be a bump for the stimulas plan and so on.

These mini bumps would look a lot like the bull crap (i mean bull trap) that is there now.

Astute Observation by Jim Jones
2008-12-10 12:02 PM

I have always thought that the rental parity equation, without qualifiers had dubious value. For me the most important qualifier is the type of property, IE nice place you would enjoy living in for an extended period and would have some pride of ownership verses crappy apt. When it comes to crappy apts like the one I currently rent there is no way I would want to own it even at rental parity. Maybe if owning resulted in a 30 percent discount over renting otherwise forget it.

When it comes to rentals there is value in not being finacially tied to the property and having the options to simply give notice and leave with minimal hassles plus you don’t suffer the opportunity costs that result from tying up money in a down payment.

To me the rental parity equation only begins to become applicable for a property that I would like to live in for an extended period like a decent SFR. Todays property is another crappy apt that I would never consider purchasing even at rental parity.

It seems like folks underestimate the responsibilities, costs and hassles of homeownership. Plus unless you have sold a home people don’t understand what a huge, time consuming hassle that can be. In my opinion these factors need to be included in any cost verses rent equations.

Astute Observation by SacRenter
2008-12-10 12:34 PM

“It seems like folks underestimate the responsibilities, costs and hassles of homeownership.”

Amen. Amen. And Amen.

Astute Observation by zubs
2008-12-10 12:07 PM

You may be worried about selling out, but as long as it’s transparent, no one will mind.  I believe fark has sponsored headlines as well.

I also like the idea of profiling other cities because not everyone who reads this blog wants to move to Irvine.

Astute Observation by OPEDThyme
2008-12-10 12:17 PM

(daily lurker, enjoyed book) There is only so much Schadenfreuden(sp?) I can deal with.  Applying your analytical skills to real world REOs worth buying would be beneficial to us renters who have never done more then window shop for houses.  As someone who puts a premium on renting (yard work thumbs down) i’m real curious about when i should jump into the market to save money (2012, but specific houses demonstrating said rentsaving thumbs up).  The same principles apply to future 330K houses worth purchase as too the crack houses currently worth leasing to people you don’t like.

As previous posters state, as long as it is clearly labeled I have no problem with you making money off giving us a fuller picture of the housing market.

Astute Observation by Robert
2008-12-10 12:40 PM

IR, If one is receiving money to do rental parity analyses? Wouldn’t one be more willing to fudge the “parity” numbers?

What would be the business model/trigger for income for a weekend-featured/analyzed property (e.g., if property is sold - a percentage, number of page views, click throughs, etc)?

Inquiring minds want to know…

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-12-10 02:39 PM

That is where personal integrity meets the desire for money. My attitude is simple: I will do an analysis as if I was considering buying the property and show it to the sponsor. If he likes what I write, he will pay for it. If he doesn’t he will not. I don’t need the money (and it’s not that much anyway) so I won’t fudge the figures to make it work.

Astute Observation by Workdrone
2008-12-10 12:45 PM

IR,

As a daily lurker, you’re doing a great service to us (and saved me a ton of cash from diving into this crazy market).  I think making a few bucks off your website is great, please just identify the sponsorship stuff so we know it’s an ad.  Thanks again for all your insights to date!

Astute Observation by Jon Alexander
2008-12-10 12:45 PM

Larry,

Of course you deserve to make some coin.  I read you blog daily.  After moving here in 2004 and witnessing the craziness of the housing bubble firsthand, your blog helped keep me sane. 

Thanks for all of your hardwork.

Jon Alexander

Astute Observation by Dawn
2008-12-10 01:08 PM

As a mostly lurker, occasional commenter, I would welcome your forays into markets other than Irvine. (Not that Irvine isn’t infinitely interesting!) Go forth and be rewarded for your outstanding efforts! I’d love to see your analyis of the Orlando market.

Astute Observation by LC
2008-12-10 01:38 PM

Seriously, money changes everything. Resist the temptation. It is why Consumer Reports does not take advertizing. You cannot even allow the appearance of duplicity. I would consider your reputation to be a much more valuable thing.

It seems very unethical to take money from the seller for an unbaised analysis. Such a report would instantly lose credibility if it was revealed that the seller paid for it. Yet, I can imagine a scenario where a buyer would pay for such a report. A big “no dice” to a potential expensive hit on your reputation.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2008-12-10 02:41 PM

That is the dilemma I wanted to discuss today. As I said above, I will analyze the property as if I were thinking about buying it and let the chips fall where they may. You are absolutely right that the small amount I might make from a sponsored post is not worth giving up my reputation. I would rather tell the truth and make nothing than lie for a few pennies.

Astute Observation by LC
2008-12-10 09:55 PM

I can see the dilemma…imagine if it were stocks, or medicine…I think that has to be a certain distance between the payer and the analyst. I think that they also want to pay you for the publicity. And what are the liability issues?

But I like the idea of venturing outside of Irvine. You really do some good analysis. I think that you could be objective, regardless. But what goes into reputation is not always rational.

Astute Observation by nefron
2008-12-10 01:49 PM

Actually, it would be helpful to us readers, too, to be able to gauge the level of craziness in Irvine.  If these other properties are in Orange County, what a revelation to see what comparable houses are listing for in other OC locations.  It adds another dimension to the analysis, actually.

Of course I echo what everyone else here has said about you deserving it.  Most of us suspected that there was something seriously wrong with the housing market in Irvine, but you put a frame around it, explained what was happening and why, and gave us perspective on what we saw and heard on a daily basis.

Astute Observation by MalibuRenter
2008-12-10 02:37 PM

“I thought Washington Mutual was supposed to be a conservative lender”

You’re kidding right?  They were the biggest advocate of option arms.  They owned Long Beach Financial, which wrote plenty of subprime.  “Out of WaMu’s $231.1 billion loan portfolio, it’s $52.9 billion in option ARMs and another $62.5 billion in home equity loans and lines of credit”  http://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/22/wamu-59-billion-provisioned-for-losses-during-q2/

Astute Observation by renterDave
2008-12-10 04:07 PM

IR-
Thanks again for a great post.  I’m sure you know that many people all over Orange County (and SoCal) read your posts.  Do you think that you would ever consider doing a week on Newport Beach, HB, or Laguna?  It would be interesting to hear some perspective on the other towns adjacent to Irvine.

Astute Observation by Bitter Renter
2008-12-10 09:29 PM

I concur—I’d be interested in seeing analyses of O.C. cities besides Irvine in more than just in the sponsored weekend posts.

Astute Observation by tlc8386
2008-12-10 07:25 PM

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/housing/2008-12-09-homeowners-late-mortgage_N.htm?POE=click-refer

and now we have these fantastic honest folks who have decided not to pay their mortgages because what is in it for me mantra——LOL

Astute Observation by zubs
2008-12-11 12:41 PM

I think due to the way the blog is set up, if you do take money for a sponsored housing post, it will be ok, because there will be a lot of comments below from us….analyzing it even more.

So if you are fudging any numbers, the readers will call you out anyway.  So it would be bad to do it…..your site is self-policing.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main