Feeble Justifications for Government Manipulation of the Housing Market

Sep 30th, 2010  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by OrangeRenter
2010-09-30 06:47 AM

Two observations:

1. You chose to profile FHA financing here. FHA is extremely strict on condo financing right now. Projects must be FHA approved (certain % sold; not in control of the developer; etc.). Could one even get FHA financing on this?

2. If it weren’t for the ridiculous HOA (800+/mo.!), I’d totally but this smile

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-09-30 08:10 AM

The analysis spreadsheet I use defaults to FHA below a certain price point. I suspect FHA financing may be available in there because the HOA is not in default. The builder still owns most of the unit, and they are paying their own HOA dues. It isn’t until HOA delinquencies go over 25% that it becomes difficult to get FHA or GSE financing.

The HOA is definitely what hurts these units. If you take $600 a month off the cost of ownership, the purchase price becomes much more reasonable.

Astute Observation by rkp
2010-09-30 08:22 AM

IR-why do you use the minimum down payment vs the conventional 20%?  You have written about the need for conventional financing and I imagine you advocate people saving a bit for their housing.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2010-09-30 08:42 AM

I am trying to reflect the reality of how people are actually buying at these lower price points. 20% down is certainly better, but few first-time buyers have saved that much money, so the lower price points are dominated by 3.5% down FHA buyers.

Astute Observation by mike
2010-09-30 09:53 AM

not surprising, but sad and irresponsible to get a loan for $400k+ and not even have $88k for the down payment.

$88k should be easy to save.
$2100/month mortgage payment+$900HOA = $3000/month. save this sum over 30 months(2.5 years) prior to getting the mortgage and you have your $88k.

Astute Observation by mike
2010-09-30 09:57 AM

hmm, i think the $3,369 monthly cash outlay is a more realistic number to use. you’d have the down payment in only 26 months (2 years 2 months)

Astute Observation by rkp
2010-09-30 09:59 AM

agree its sad but agree with IR’s point of it being a reality

however, when discussing rental parity, do you assume 3.5% down or 20% down?  it makes a big difference right?  also, if using income in appraisal, would the loan monthly cash outlay be less than or equal to the income?

Astute Observation by ripcord
2010-09-30 10:24 AM

So, Mike, is your fictional buyer living at home with their family for 26 months to save up 88k?  That would royally suck; I’d rather rent forever. 

A married couple living in coastal OC with a kid would need a two-bedroom apt, about $2k or so in Tustin.  Then they could save roughly 1k per month if all the extra went to the down payment.  They would take 88 months or over 7 years.  I don’t think saving 20 percent down is easy in Irvine, especially if you have a family.

A single guy or gal with a really good job could do it in a few years, but most families could not.  It costs a lot to live in OC, you know.

Astute Observation by rkp
2010-09-30 11:07 AM

I disagree.  I come from a saving culture and I see how much my friends spend and how easy it is to save if they tried.  A married couple with a kid renting for 2k a month and wanting to buy a 400k place should be making 70k a month after taxes at the minimum.  Rent + living should be 48k (2k rent+2k living) so they should be able to set aside $20k+ per year.  4-5 years of saving and they have their downpayment.  Frankly their rent and monthly living is way to high so I think they can save 88k faster.  People just don’t know how to save…

Astute Observation by Renter1
2010-09-30 11:36 AM

I don’t think a lot of households have a $150k pre-tax income. Also $2k living is very tight for a family. The daycare alone is $1k per month. Add on food ($500), 2 cheap cars ($500), very basic travel/vacation ($300), clothes/insurance/beauty/entertainment/etc ($300), cable/web/phone ($200) and you get very close to $3k for a fairly basic, no frills lifestyle. Even if you made $150 k, you only save $10k per year. The only solution is to move to a cheaper state, will lower rents and without income tax. That’s my plan.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2010-09-30 12:29 PM

Most people are horrible savers.  Regarding our fictious young family living in OC, once you add up all the monthly expenses listed above and add in savings for retirement, student loans, existing credit card debt…there isn’t a whole lot left over to save for a downpayment.  Even saving $1500/month would take almost 5 years to save the 84K.  Few people are willing to sacrifice like that and put their lives on hold for 5 years to save that magic downpayment.

Astute Observation by FoolishRenter
2010-09-30 07:26 PM

With reoccuring monthly expense like that there very little chances of saving enought for a 20% down.  Time to get real and live within one means.  The only one that I might agree with is $500 for food.  Who needs cable when free digital TV is available.  With a one income family, I rarely break $150k per year, but save about $30k.  That even with $12 to 15k for donations.  Granted not many expensive vacations in the last 20 years, running the cars until they are in the ground, buy only when on deep discount sales (harder now with the low inventory at the stores).  I know many who make much less than me, but save more.

At the grand opening, the agent said the first year’s HOA was included in the price.  So, they should have no defaults on the HOA.  If the units are not complete, then they may also qualify for mostly owner occuppied, since those other units are not yet available.

As for time on the market as an indicator for being overbuilt, I think the number of vacant units are more accurate.  A investor buy lots of vacant unit will decease the time on the market, but their still not enough people to live in them.

The traffic noise was too much for me.  RE agent had background music to cover the noise.

Astute Observation by Saving downpayment
2010-10-01 09:58 AM

Those numbers are very close to what our expenses are but don’t forhet health insurance where many employers don’t pay for health insurance of family members so that comes out of the paycheck as well, so add at least $500 to cover family members. Add some $ for car insurance, registration, and maintenance - all necessary - and you end up with at least $4,000 monthly expenses which means a family needs to make at least $70,000 a year to be left with that much money. Now, if you have two family members working and each is making say $70,000 a year, then it’s possible to save maybe $2,000 / month after the added expense of child care depending on whether you have one or two kids…. It’s not easy for most people but not so hard for some.

Astute Observation by toshi
2010-10-01 12:52 PM

I agree with the others that saving 88K is a lot harder in reality than it is in some idealized situation.  Even if you have a good income and you live well within your means, things aren’t always so simple.  You may get laid off and lose a few months worth of income.  You may need to buy a new car.  Or, you may decide that you want to further your education.  Lot of things happen.

Among my friends who have bought homes in recent years, almost all of them received sizable contributions from their parents for their down payments.  I think most of these parents have wholeheartedly embraced the “housing is always a great investment” mantra, and in many cases, they were the ones who were pushing their reluctant kids to buy a house.

A friend of a friend bought a house about a year ago and he had lived at home for several years (even shared a car with his mom) in order to save for a big down payment on this boring 500K tract house in the burbs.  While I think he should be commended for his prudence, I wish he would have stopped to think about whether or not this house was really worth half a mill.

Astute Observation by FoolishRenter
2010-09-30 07:44 PM

I expect 0% HOA deliquency with the builder paying the first year’s HOA as part of the purchase price.

I friend just purchased a new Irine house.  The builder required 20% down.  Likely to prevent squatter from lowering the price of the other houses.  HOA will have leverage with enforcement.  The HOA has no leverage with zero or negative equiltiy squatters.  Is the HOA going to do foreclose on someone with no equility? :(

Astute Observation by rkp
2010-09-30 08:17 AM

My friend just rented out his 2B+loft 1200 sq ft place in avenue 1 for 2000 a month.  From pure rent per sq ft, the astoria unit should rent for $2618.  obviously rent doesn’t go up linearly but I think this could rent for $2300-2500.

Astute Observation by IR_Fan
2010-09-30 10:34 AM

avenue 1 and this place are vastly differently. I used to live in watermarke and have a coworker who lives in Avenue 1. Also saw these units.
No comparison between the two.

Astute Observation by rkp
2010-09-30 11:08 AM

I imagine astoria is much nicer.  Ave 1 is overrun by
college students.  Hence the rent of 2300-2500.  Do
you think it can rent for more?

Astute Observation by Perspective
2010-09-30 01:25 PM

That’s fitting considering it feels like a college dorm when you’re walking through the hallways.

Astute Observation by FoolishRenter
2010-09-30 07:38 PM

Usually rents can be higher with students cause the rent is shared and wear and tear seems to be higher. 

A co-worker was renting a TIC 2 bd apt or $1600 in Irvine.  The renting of 3/4 bd duplex/fourplex or houses for a good price seems to be the luck of the draw.  Seems like $2500 to $3200 is a very popular range.

Astute Observation by Foreign Cash Buyer
2010-09-30 08:18 AM

$2,545 .......... Monthly Cost of Ownership

is not much at all considering The Essex Skyline in Santa Ana is renting smaller units for well over $3,000 a month.

Astute Observation by Planet Reality
2010-09-30 08:41 AM

Don’t try to suggest this is at rental parity or that Irvine inventory is only 860.

Instead invest in the slam dunk Las Vegas trustee sale market.

Astute Observation by no worries
2010-09-30 09:49 AM

PR, posts like this sound very childish.

If you have a point to make, just make it.

I enjoy when you spot properties selling near rental parity, and point them out. I don’t yet believe that’s the general scenario, but some properties seem to cross that line (for various reasons).

Astute Observation by mark g
2010-09-30 08:43 AM

Amen-ities.. as in ‘Dear God please let this be enough to dump this onto someone else!’

Astute Observation by tenmagnet
2010-09-30 10:10 AM

These Condo tower projects don’t seem to work in Irvine.
No surprise that the developer is losing money.
It’s like swimming against the tide.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2010-09-30 10:11 AM

Can anyone imagine what would happen to Orange County real estate prices if the gov’t completely got out of the mortgage business?

Astute Observation by Perspective
2010-09-30 01:28 PM

That could be said for the price of anything, really, no?

Can you imagine how low tuition would be if the government didn’t provide its own loans and subsidize private student loans?

Astute Observation by SanJoseRenter
2010-09-30 08:12 PM

Perspective:

The government does not support prices for everything.

For strategic reasons, most governments do support agricultural pricing.

In the case of housing, we’ve seen what happens when they meddle.

I don’t know about school loan subsidies, but that seems different conceptually than supporting house prices.

Astute Observation by FreedomCM
2010-09-30 10:51 AM

I’m not sure about using FHA financing for this purchase.

As well as I’ve been able to find from the FHA website, two criteria must be met:

1.  less than X% deliquent (25%?)

2.  more than 51% owner-occupied.

This last point kills any FHA financing in many newer, incompletely sold projects (see FLA and lawyerliz).  It also kills many older projects that have original owners renting out their ‘starter’ units (see south coast plaza).

But of course, I am not a pro.

Perhaps SGIP could comment?

Astute Observation by rkp
2010-09-30 10:58 AM

I imagine astoria is much nicer.  Ave 1 is overrun by college students.  Hence the rent of 2300-2500.  Do you think it can rent for more?

Astute Observation by Marc
2010-09-30 01:24 PM

It might be nicer inside but there is no way that I will live that close to the toxic 405. These units should be priced 30% below Ave One/Watermarke to account for the health hazard and the high HOA.

Astute Observation by SanJoseRenter
2010-09-30 08:02 PM

San Jose has an analog to North Korea Towers.

It’s called the Onyx, located one block from eBay Graylands, and was finished after the crash.

What’s interesting is that although the asking price of $500,000 for a 2/1.5 is similar to North Korea, Onyx has a great location for yuppies.

Another thing in common is that at nite, the windows are black as coal - hardly an occupied unit.

The only thing that keeps the Onyx from selling like hotcakes is that pesky asking price.

Astute Observation by Swiller
2010-09-30 09:52 PM

I’m mad as hell!!! Prisoners should never get to live this well. We get to live like scrubs, but this prison in Irvine proves our incarcerated are treated overly well.

Is that a green illuminated EXIT sign in the background by the door?

Astute Observation by BD
2010-09-30 11:18 PM

....they must be kidding.  An HOA of $800 - $1000 / month?  They should just throw in a Ferrari for ever with purchase. 

Realtarded… good luck.

BD

Astute Observation by George Williams
2010-09-30 11:27 PM

Lennar will no doubt take a huge loss on this development: it is located in a highly-trafficked (read noisy) area, school district is Santa Ana, so that rules out those with kids, the HOA’s are riduculous - and they are butt ugly!

One would think they would have done better research regarding what Orange County residents are looking for in such a dense development.

Astute Observation by BD
2010-10-01 12:30 AM

I know this means little to most but, have you ever contempated what you can afford monthly on your retirement (IRA, 401K, SS, Other)? 

Most cannot afford 5-600 dollars a month!  I’m talking about people with non-gov benefits!  Unless you are a retired fire-fighter making 90% of your salery in pension the rest of your life most will be hard pressed to just stay in OC. 

The average American retires with less than $50K in savings… sad. 

BD

Astute Observation by BD
2010-10-01 01:09 AM

Does anyone ever think of paying off their house??

You really think you are going to be 70 yrs old (40 and a 30 year mortgage) paying 4K a month with mortgage and taxes etc. 

I make a great living but, I don’t see this for myself making 250K+ a year.  How do all the others???

BD

Astute Observation by groundhogdaze
2010-10-04 02:52 PM

BD, I wonder about this as well.  When one is retired and not working, how does one sustain themselves if one has to pay thousands in property tax on top of everything else (insurance, hip surgery, etc…)?  I’d rather be using that money to go traveling and avoiding needy friends and family who weren’t so prudent and looking for handouts.  We reap what we sow and it appears folks are sowing Soylent Green.  If you don’t wanna be on the menu, you’d better start running like Logan…  Only time will tell if all roads lead to dystopia like the road we are on now seems to.

Astute Observation by gepetoh
2010-10-01 07:25 AM

Net monthly cost of $2,545 for a 2/2 @1500+ sf in Irvine?  That looks pretty consistent (favorable, actually) with what I’m finding for the nicer apartment complexes in Irvine…  What am I missing?

Astute Observation by toshi
2010-10-01 12:57 PM

@IrvineRenter: Why do you refer to these towers as “North Korea Towers”?  I’ve seen you blog about them in the past, but I’ve never understood why you called them that.

Astute Observation by toshi
2010-10-01 01:08 PM

Here in downtown San Diego, we have our own problems with luxury condo towers, but none is more emblematic than the Vantage Pointe.  It’s downtown San Diego’s largest condo building with 679 units.  Even though it was completed in 2008, they haven’t sold a single unit and it is currently sparsely occupied by renters.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vantage_Pointe_Condominium

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main