Bruce Norris: OC shadow inventory liquidations will reduce price support

Oct 3rd, 2011  
by IrvineRenter  in Library News

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by Perspective
2011-10-03 07:37 AM

I finally know someone who is truly “strategically” defaulting.  I know plenty of people who have defaulted, but I wouldn’t define any one of those as strategic.  Those families all had much stronger forces causing the default unrelated to their underwater position (divorce, income loss, bought a house 4x+ their income, used a neg-am loan, etc.). 

A family I know has just missed their first mortgage payment after trying to find an alternative resolution with their lender for months.  They bought a house they could afford in 2006 and have been doing fine financially, but their OC house is down nearly 40%.

Just an anecdote I thought I’d share.  I have a couple other similarly situated friends that just haven’t found the will to stop making payments.  We’ll see how low long they hold out…

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2011-10-04 07:58 AM

If it circulates around your circle of friends that one of the strategically defaulted, it will give the green light to the others considering the same.

Astute Observation by Walter
2011-10-03 07:50 AM

I have learned a lot listening to Bruce’s radio show. Unlike many in the real estate industrial complex, I think he is well intentioned.

But I have to agree that the notation of higher down payments not reducing default rates is fantastical.

Astute Observation by lee in irvine
2011-10-03 10:59 AM

There will be no bottom and recovery in local real estate until we see a substantial and sustainable increase in sales volume.  We do have pent-up demand in Orange County, yet today’s pricing is still not capable lure these new capable buyers waiting on the fence.

Astute Observation by Chuck Ponzi
2011-10-03 01:22 PM

Bruce is talking his book.

He wants lower downs for investors especially so he can capture more at cash-flow.

Follow the money.

Chuck

Astute Observation by so_scared
2011-10-04 08:38 AM

not exactly what he said.

—-

As a matter of fact, looking at a chart from 1980 to 2000, there is little difference between the performance and the LOSSES from a 20% down program and a zero-down VA LOAN PROGRAM.

—-
he maybe be parsing words to be very specific but nothing that IR showed disproved this particular statement about VA loans and losses from them.

Astute Observation by SanJoseRenter
2011-10-03 07:56 AM

IR:

Thanks for the North Korea towers update!

I was about to request one, but you beat me to the submit button. Makes me laugh all day. smile

Some ideas for the next update:

- have HoAs increased since opening?
- what is the occupancy rate?
- what is reception at auction?
- any liens or construction-related lawsuits?

Regarding Bruce Norris’ comments: they don’t make any sense. Who does he actually represent when he says “we”? Is it RE investors as he claims, or 6 percenters (realtors), who need another bubble inflation?

Anybody who claims zero-down is the same as 20% down is a demagogue who believes that all opinions are equally valid to the public, regardless of supporting data.

Astute Observation by *
2011-10-03 09:25 AM

summary of comments from owners of the north korean towers. source.

i haven’t heard from any of the losers(literally) from north korean towers for a while.

a comment from “dr e”(e for ecstasy?) in 2006:
“I guess you can view Marquee as an Ivory tower. People at the top will always have people commenting about them.”

it took 5 long years to prove this guy/gal was a complete dumb-ass. many of us knew he was a dumb-ass in 2006, but in 2011 all doubt has been removed.

Astute Observation by Duran
2011-10-03 10:54 AM

This is apparently happening more and more…

From Wall Street Journal the other Day:

“Joseph Reilly lost his vacation home here last year when he was out of work and stopped paying his mortgage. The bank took the house and sold it. Mr. Reilly thought that was the end of it.

In June, he learned otherwise. A phone call informed him of a court judgment against him for $192,576.71.

It turned out that at a foreclosure sale, his former house fetched less than a quarter of what Mr. Reilly owed on it. His bank sued him for the rest “

Surely this will cause an even bigger drag on the recovery ?

Astute Observation by Walter
2011-10-03 11:30 AM

In Cali, a short sale should deal with this. Plus all the free rent while the bank takes forever to approve it can make it a win win for the loan owner.

Astute Observation by flyovercountry
2011-10-03 11:50 AM

The bank is simply exercising its contractual option to obtain maximum recovery from the former loan owner. Its just business, not personal.

I guess Californians get to avoid this on first mortgages when the bank uses their one action on forclosure.  But is it possible to get deficiency judgements against people who default on their seconds and HELOCs?

Astute Observation by awgee
2011-10-03 02:25 PM

and those who refied.

Astute Observation by Walter
2011-10-03 12:25 PM

http://preventingforeclosure.org/news/new-california-short-sale-law-having-unintended-consequences/

The recently passed California Senate Bill 458 which disallows second lien holders from pursuing a deficiency judgment on a seller after a short sale seems to have been well intended, but in practice it is killing some short sales according to real estate agents.
***
I was half way through the SS approval process for a buyer when this law hit. Caused the file to go back to the start with both lenders. Finally got approvals for the first and second last week and we are in escrow. Looks like the loan owner walks clean.

Astute Observation by flyovercountry
2011-10-03 01:49 PM

Do banks charge a higher interest rate to California borrowers than they do in the 41 judicial foreclosure states?

If not, it is more evidence that they suck at risk management.

Astute Observation by Perspective
2011-10-03 02:28 PM

Well, there are pros & cons for lenders in CA (a non-judicial foreclosure state).  A lender can foreclose within a few months if so inclined, while in judicial foreclosure states it can take much longer.

Astute Observation by SanJoseRenter
2011-10-03 12:46 PM

Charlie Rose interviewing Warren Buffett on Sept. 30, 2011:

When will the economy improve? If we create more households than houses ...

Are we entering a second recession? We won’t enter a second recession ... my portfolio of 70 businesses is doing fine, just not galloping.

When will American economy start growing again? A lot of times when people talk about growth, they really mean inflation.

We have a deficit of 10% of GDP. That’s a lot of stimulus.

The American economy is really strong, though it may take 5 years to see it.

The Europeans tried an experiment. The imperfections have become manifest. [To succeed, 17 countries would need a shared culture.]

It’s always easy to tell the other guy to adopt austerity.

I’ve never called the President. Occasionally he calls me.

Do we need a third party? I don’t know how that works.

Charlie Rose with Warren Buffett

Astute Observation by *
2011-10-03 04:27 PM

watched the episode. good one. thanks.

Astute Observation by Brian Gray
2011-10-03 06:51 PM

You could have continued the lyrics…

“If this ain’t love, you’d better let me know”

Perfect representation of the mentality of some former and current homeowners, especially those who bought in the middle of the last decade.

Astute Observation by AZ Cat Herder
2011-10-03 07:14 PM

A little off-topic, but I have been an avid reader for a couple of years now, and have held off buying for a while now in part based on the fantastic knowledge I’ve gained from this site.  This situation has just arised, and would love to know what others think.
We have been looking for a house for quite some time but have not found the one yet.  In the meantime, we have been renting a decent house that meets our current needs but is not a long term solution.  We signed a 1-year lease, but are currently month to month.

We have suspected the owner of the house has not been paying the mortgage, but could never prove it.  Well, last week the notice of trustee sale showed up, along with a debt collection notice; the loser has not paid since January of 2010, all the while cashing our rent checks, and owes somewhere around $32,000.  Yes, he is aware, and yes he knows that we know.  That is a fantastic positive cash flow swing, not paying that amount while collecting more or less the same in rent…

What options do we have?  Legally we know we’re in a tough spot, but having to move to temporary housing while we continue to look for a house to buy is a pain.  We paid the last month up front when we signed the lease which would be aplied to this month if we do decide to leave, so we have not technically paid this month yet as we decide what to do.  He has already told us this is the last month of the month to month arrangement if we don’t pay.

He has a real estate license in Arizona, currently inactive, but the state board does not investigate ethics complaints, but he is not a member of AAR, which does investigate ethics claims.  Naturally.

He claims to be a CFP, but the College of Financial Planning has no record of him.  He does work for/as a financial planner, and I plan on filing an ethics complaint directly with his employer, not that it will do much good.

I did go directly to his bank today, lease and 2 years worth of utility bills in hand to prove residency but they shook their heads and said sorry, there’s nothing they can do at this point.  I suspect, but cant prove, he is claiming this house as a primary residence and failing to tell the bank of the monthly rental income.  Again, a great scam.

Until the bank takes posession (the auction is scheduled for mid-December) I know we have to continue to pay him, as distasteful as that is, or move, as inconvenient as that is.  Given how much the note is for, and how underwater he is given current sales in the neighborhood, I dont think it will actually be sold.  So, are there any avenues worth pursuing or should we just pack up and move?

A little off-topic, I realize, but since we have tried to play it safe and rent while looking for a house to buy, and since this is taking place in Phoenix, I figure I am not the only reader here who has seen or heard of this before.

It is frustrating to play by the rules, only to see so many others take advantage and game the system like this guy is doing.

And if this isn’t enough, we moved out of the previous house we were renting for the exact same reason. 

It may not be the best time to buy, but the costs and hassles of moving to another rental sure make buying a little more appealing, if only there was something even remotely close to our needs and cost preference.

Astute Observation by *
2011-10-03 07:33 PM

post your question on the patrick.net:
http://patrick.net/forum/housing-market/

also this question has already been asked on patrick.net. so you can do a search for more info.

Astute Observation by AZ Cat Herder
2011-10-03 07:49 PM

Thank-you, I didn’t think of that.

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2011-10-03 07:33 PM

Not much chance of ever getting your damage deposit back.

Astute Observation by AZ Cat Herder
2011-10-03 07:52 PM

I know, and that’s what kills me. 
It’s not the money in of of itself, it’s the fact that short of taking him to court, he’ll get away with it.  Stealing from the bank, and stealing from me.  What a great scam.

Astute Observation by Walter
2011-10-03 08:00 PM

Was in a similar, not as bad situation. We were so sick of renting we bought earlier this year. Most likely did not get the bottom, but so glad the waiting is over.

With interest rates where they are, we are at about rental parity so things have worked out so far…

Astute Observation by flyovercountry
2011-10-03 08:09 PM

The bank’s loss isn’t your concern.  If they are lousy at business, don’t sweat it.

As for your damage deposit and last months rent.  You do have leverage.  Its unlikely that he’ll be able to get a tenant for the last couple months before the bank auction, so negotiate a reduced rent and / or your damage deposit returned to you.

Be prepared to leave, but how quickly could he really evict you if he wanted to?

If I was the sleazy landlord, I’d be willing to take a reduced rent vs no rent.

Astute Observation by wheresthebeef
2011-10-03 09:03 PM

That’s a tough spot to be in.  That sucks that this douche is just cashing your rent check and not paying the mortgage, I have heard of people doing this with MULTIPLE properties.  Water in the bridge, there’s not a whole lot you can do about this.

You’re in for some hassle, but fortunately you won’t be out of much money.  If this place really will go to auction in December…you need to think about finding another place regardless.  Just to stall, I would tell him we are currently looking for another place and will pay 50% of the rent for the remainder of the year…tell him you either get SOME money or ZERO money.  I can almost guarantee you he is not claiming any of the rent as income, dodging taxes.  Doesn’t the IRS have a tip hotline…he might change his tune if you threaten him with that.

Sounds like the Phoenix market is still a mess.  If you’re not comfortable buying why don’t you rent an apartment for 6 months and let the dust settle.  At least you won’t be forced to move again…I guess that all depends on your situation.

Astute Observation by AZ Cat Herder
2011-10-03 09:38 PM

The original deed of trust stipulates that once a notice of default has been delivered, he no longer has claim to the rents and that they are to be delivered directly to the lender.  (Chase is the note-holder, California Reconveyance is the Trustee, so I am not sure who actually is entitled to those monies.)
The lease itself has a NTS clause, so he technically violated the lease, so we’re thinking of setting up an account to pay the rent into and let him know we’re doing so.  If the bank comes looking for it, we’ll have it ready to go and if no one comes looking for it, more down-payment for us.
We will ask him for the info on the escrow account that holds the last month’s rent and security deposits so we can inform the bank of that as well.
Apartments dont work for us as we have 3 cats.  2 seems to be the line apartment complexes draw between normal and crazy.  Again, we feel we are so close to finding a place to buy…

Astute Observation by Anonymous
2011-10-03 07:30 PM

Low-end homesellers asking for ’09 prices
http://lansner.ocregister.com/2011/10/03/low-end-homesellers-asking-for-09-prices/127293/

Astute Observation by Foreclosed Renter
2011-10-08 07:27 AM

Our previous rental went through foreclosure.  When we revieved the NTS, we contacted our landlord and negotiated to get our security deposit back by deducting $500 per month in rent.  We also changed the rent due date to the day after the trustee sale gets continued.  The landlord wanted to list the home for sale as a short sale and wanted us to show the home, so we negotiated $200 off the monthly rent for this.  It took about 9 months for the bank to foreclose and by that time we had recouped our security deposit and were not out any money. Under Federal law, banks have to give renters 90 days notice.  It took about 2 weeks for the bank to contact us and another 2 weeks for them to make a cash for keys offer.  Mesnwhile, we are not paying rent to anyone.  We negotiated $10,000 to move out in 4 weeks (again, a rent free 4 weeks).  Being foreclosed on as a renter isn’t so bad…

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main