Are You Smarter than a Real Estate Agent?

Jan 22nd, 2009  
by IrvineRenter  in Price Rollback

Astute Observations

Astute Observation by LC
2009-01-22 06:27 AM

Great quiz. It reminds me that I should be studying.

Astute Observation by NanoWest
2009-01-22 07:18 AM

great quiz, I was really surprised by the interest deduction not being of value because of the standard deduction.

I believe there is a typo in the answer to 12, it should be 29% after 15 years.

Astute Observation by SocalianInIowa
2009-01-22 07:30 AM

I was also surprised by that… when doing my taxes after buying my first home for about that amount, 2 years ago.  I was expecting a whopper of a refund, but did the math and found myself owing a few K as well as owing the state of CA under-withholding penalties.

FWIW, the realtor never made any statements implying that the purchase was an investment or even financially wise.

Astute Observation by MalibuRenter
2009-01-22 09:15 AM

Isn’t that what question 12 currently says?

“2. If you have a 30 year fixed rate loan at 6% interest, how much of the principal will you have paid off after 15 years?  __under 25%, __25-35%, __35-45%, __45-55%, __over 55%.

A.  25-35%.  At the end of 15 years, at 6% you would have paid off 29.4% of principal.  At 5% interest, you would have paid off 32.5%.  At 7% interest you would have paid off 26.6%.”

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-01-22 09:44 AM

I fixed it. It originally said 25 years.

Astute Observation by awgee
2009-01-22 07:19 AM

Thanks MR.  That was fun.

Astute Observation by george8
2009-01-22 07:27 AM

I wonder how much rent today’s featured condo can fetch? Is there anyone renting in Turtle Ridge?  Can anyone post a rental ad there?

Astute Observation by NanoWest
2009-01-22 08:10 AM

I follow the rental market in Huntington Beach where I rent now. All I can say is that the inventory of rentals on CL is going up substantially. My bet is we will see dramatic drops in rent over the next two years…...10 to 15 percent.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-01-22 09:16 AM

and as rent falls, so does the realistic asking price of a home based on the Irvine Renters gold standard: price to rent ratio. Encouraging news that waiting is the wise choice to those wanting to buy and having to live within a budget!

Astute Observation by Soapboxpolitico
2009-01-23 02:52 AM

Hi George. I think I’m well placed to answer your question.
I currently rent a “luxury” townhome in Foothill Ranch. The similarities to my place and this featured property are very close indeed. I’m at 1400 sq.ft, 2bd/2.5 bths, attached 2-car garage etc.
I am paying just over $2200/mo. for our place.  At a GRM of 160 that puts the sale value of this joint closer to $355K or $400K at a generous 180 GRM.  Clearly the “owner” is still K-A intoxicated and the realtard is mailing it in.  $600K asking price isn’t just grossly overpriced it’s flat insulting. Even the $495K sale price in 2004 was a joke but hey ... a fool and her money are soon parted. This chick is just betting the next fool is right around the corner. Dare to dream honey, dare to dream!

Astute Observation by Kool_Aid_is_my_Hero
2009-01-26 11:14 PM

Astute Observation by Kool_Aid_is_my_Hero
2009-01-26 11:18 PM

That didn’t quite work.  Let’s try that again….
<object width=“425” height=“344”><param name=“movie” value=“http://www.youtube.com/v/ZP1USaPMXpI&hl=en&fs=1”></param></param></param><embed src=“http://www.youtube.com/v/ZP1USaPMXpI&hl=en&fs=1” type=“application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=“always” allowfullscreen=“true” width=“425” height=“344”></embed></object>

Astute Observation by brea
2009-01-22 07:45 AM

Fun quiz.  On Question #5, there will be some benefit for itemizing deductions.  Since we are able to also deduct state taxes, income and property, the mortgage interest will throw him over the standard deduction by some amount.

Astute Observation by MalibuRenter
2009-01-22 09:13 AM

This is true.  If you use the median income of $60k for a CA couple, they pay $3276 in CA income taxes. 

At 1% property tax, their property tax deduction is $2000.

So, $10,740 + $3276 + 2000 = $16,016.  The portion over the standard deduction is $4616.  At at 25% tax rate, that’s a net federal tax reduction of $1154.

With over $16k spent on mortgage payments and property taxes, that’s a small mortgage interest deduction.

Astute Observation by No_Such_Reality
2009-01-22 08:58 PM

No. No. No. 

$2000 more in taxes (property) less $1154 “savings” (income tax) is $846 more tax!

Astute Observation by FairEconomist
2009-01-23 12:10 AM

But the questions was about the value of the interest deduction, not of the home purchase. The interest deduction would be saving this hypothetical family money - they’d be worse off without it. They’d still have to pay their property tax if they took the standard deduction.

Astute Observation by mav
2009-01-22 09:10 PM

The tax deduction is mostly for the well to do.  If you get a large bonus each year… that has a 50% tax rate.

Astute Observation by RahRahGrl
2009-01-22 09:02 AM

Did I read that Redfin posting correctly?  That condo has been on the market since June 2006!!  Time to fire that agent.

Astute Observation by Texas Triffid Ranch
2009-01-22 09:38 AM

Somehow, I get the feeling that the house has had multiple agents, because each and every one gave up in disgust at the owner’s delusions.  I’ve been watching this game of musical chairs with one property near my house:  the owner bought a horribly overpriced older house, started renovations, and then “accidentally” knocked out the supports during the gutting so he could build a McMansion in its place.  Unfortunately for him, he couldn’t get the loan nor the permits for the new house, so now he wants to take his toys and go home.  Problem is, he’s still paying off a mortgage for what’s essentially an empty lot with an obscenely expensive stone wall around the front and sides, so he’s been advertising for the last year to find someone dumb enough to pay that much for that small a space.  Three agents and counting, and I suspect that he’ll go through more realtors than there are stars in the known universe before he finds someone dumb enough to buy at the rate he’s asking.

Astute Observation by Tempted
2009-01-22 09:12 AM

Stories: 3+

How exactly does one fit 3+ stories in 1400 sq ft?

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-01-22 09:47 AM

There is so much wasted space with staircases that it must feel very tiny. However, it is Turtle Ridge in Irvine, so it must be worth at least $600K… Not.

Astute Observation by Forbear
2009-01-22 12:41 PM

“How exactly does one fit 3+ stories in 1400 sq ft?”

Picture living on a ladder.

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2009-01-22 02:45 PM

Hey IR, when are you gonna use “I wanna marry a lighthouse keeper”, from A Clockwork Orange? Seems appropriate for the 3 story models.

Astute Observation by Soapboxpolitico
2009-01-23 02:59 AM

Well. If you count the attached garage as a floor ... voila, three stories!  Referring to my earlier post response to George8, my current rental is a townhome, 1400 sq. ft. with the garage beneath my main floor. I dunno if they describe it as a 3 floor or merely 2 floor with attached garage. I suppose I should check.

Point is, I have a garage, main floor and then the bedrooms on the top floor. Stacked as it is, it could technically be described as a three story townhome.

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 10:23 AM

I’m terrible at math and need some perspective. Anybody want to play as Suze Orman for me???

I’ve got 190k left on my condo that I bought in ‘01 for $300k @ 5.75%. I make over 90k a yr and have no other debt. Since I don’t plan on living in my condo indefinitely, is it worth even trying to pay it off? Or is it? I hate the idea of losing 10k a year in interest.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-01-22 10:45 AM

In order to obtain the tax benefit you must be spending money on interest. It is NEVER a good idea to spend a dollar to save a quarter. Everyone who tries to concoct a reason why the HMID is good forgets this basic fact.

The personal exemption is free. It costs you nothing. Spending a great deal of money on interest in order to give up something you are given for free doesn’t make sense (or cents).

The home mortgage interest deduction makes interest less painful, but it is still a pain.

Pay off your mortgage. You will be better off.

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 11:07 AM

If I pay it off won’t it take me over 10 years to even make my money back ?(assuming I can keep it rented and not assuming rent will go up)

Should I just try to sell it and take the little equity I have left and rent?  Prices are only going to go down further. 

I don’t even believe housing is a good long term investment anymore.

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 11:14 AM

btw, can you explain the “personal exemption”? What do oyu mean by free?  I’m bad with taxes.

Astute Observation by SouthBayRenter
2009-01-22 11:38 AM

He means that you can always take the standard deduction, whether or not you did anything that would qualify you for itemized deductions.  Even if you make less than the deduction you can still claim its full value.  It is a free offset to your tax that requires no participation in any of the social encouragements that itemized deductions attempt to encourage.

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-01-22 12:11 PM

2009 is going to be the last year I will probably recommend to people to sell and rent for a while. As prices get closer to the bottom, there isn’t enough to be made on the “short trade” to make it worth while.

Since you bought your house as a place to live, and since you have been conservative with your mortgage, I would forget about the resale price and live your life. There is no compelling reason for you to sell.

Also, since you said you have a $300,000 condo, properties in these price ranges have already seen significant depreciation, and they are probably closer to the bottom than to the top. The people who are at most risk of continuing depreciation are those with much more expensive properties. Their pain is yet to come. This is the group I would advise to sell.

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 01:09 PM

my only worry is that the condo is in a high-end area (appraising at 380000) still too high IMOP.
I fear when the high end defaults start rolling in with the Alt-A’s resetting in the coming years,our condo community will turn into a ghost town. The HOA’s will go through the roof or worse…go into bankruptcy like in Vegas.  I HATE HOA’s. What do you do if 50% of your community is owned by the banks?  Clearly the banks won’t pay the HOA’s.  So the load is left on the remaining owners.

Astute Observation by Bitter Renter
2009-01-22 05:18 PM

My understanding is that the banks are legally required to pay the HOAs on REOs, though I have heard of cases where associations have had to take them to court to get the money out of them.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-01-22 01:06 PM

I assume you have a 30 yr fixed interest (5.75%) loan, put nothing down and therefore have a monthly payment of about $1750/mo.
You also bought just as prices were starting to go up. There’s no way of knowing how much more they will drop but I doubt seriously that prices on nice units (condo or home) in a desireable area will drop much below the 2000 price since that was the last year of normal appreciation. (Just for interest sake, I’d check to see what units comparable to yours are renting for. Use the price to rent ratio of 180 to multiply the monthly rent. That will give you a ballpark figure for what units might sell for in normal times).
Bottom line: If I were you, I’d stay put for now.
You might consider paying down the principal on you loan (if there is no prepayment penalty) since you’ll be saving 5.75% on each prepaid dollar. That saving is a lot better than the 1% you currently get on a savings account. (if you do decide to pay down the principal, I suggest writing a second check just for the principal - and designate it as such - to send with your monthly mortgage check.That way there is a separate record of each additional principal payment. Good luck!

Astute Observation by freedomCM
2009-01-22 02:27 PM

wrong!

the bubble began in 1998, by 2001 it was already as high as the bubble in 1991, overpriced by 30% (just not the 300% of 2006)

and wrong!

rents are currently in a small bubble, which is just starting to deflate.  rent bubble started in 2001, so look at rents from then to run your GRM numbers

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 02:29 PM

Thanks for the advice. Yes it is a 30yr fixed. And since you put it that way, I will continue to contribute more to the principle. My only worry was this deflation period ending too soon. I assume it would be prudent to pay off the condo before inflation settles in. As for prices crashing..my most depressing guess would be that housing prices drop another 15-25% when the Alt-A’s go through. 

Seriously, how long do you think this society can last without loans from the banks? This country is broke.

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 02:31 PM

how do I look up that info?

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2009-01-22 02:49 PM

You should also consider refinancing.  Considering your equity position you could potentially bring that rate down well below 5%.  Makes the paying off go alot faster…

Astute Observation by SeattleDave
2009-01-22 04:38 PM

Refinancing makes no sense if he is paying extra principle every month.  He doesn’t need a lower monthly payment, and the additional transaction fees (assuming he pays them upfront instead of financing them with the new loan)would be better spent on applying it to the principle.  In most cases, refinancing does not save any money in the long run.  The lower monthly payments are offset by the transaction costs and the additional time that you must make a mortgage payment.

Astute Observation by thrifty
2009-01-22 05:19 PM

FreedomCM: I think the bubble we’ve been discussing doesnot include 1991. My suggestion to compare current rents was to give idmkurm… the tool to see if rents in his/her area are in line with traditional price/rent ratios. They definitely are not in the San Clemente area.
Question for you: Care to make a guess in percentage terms where the current prices will land relative to 2000; i.e., % above or % below the 2000 price?

Astute Observation by Bitter Renter
2009-01-22 05:24 PM

“Additional time that you *must* make a mortgage payment”?  There’s nothing stopping you from paying extra principle after refinancing (again, assuming no prepayment penalty on the new loan).  Your point about the transaction costs is a good one, but depending on how high those are, a cut in your interest rate could certainly outweigh them, assuming you’re going to pay down extra principle either way.

Astute Observation by brea
2009-01-22 07:15 PM

In the 90’s as rates were dropping, I refinanced with no points or fees.  The rate was higher than if I had paid points, but lower than I had.  That meant that I had no risk or cost.  As rates continued to drop I continued to refinance.  During this time I was also prepaying my loan.

Astute Observation by Bitter Renter
2009-01-23 01:47 AM

Argh, I was parroting an error there—that’s “principal”, not “principle”.

Astute Observation by alan
2009-01-22 12:16 PM

I am in a house with no mortgage.  It’s so great not to make a monthly payment.  I highly recommend it.  Don’t worry about returns on other investment.  The peace of mind is priceless.

Astute Observation by awgee
2009-01-22 12:53 PM

Congratulations.  You are my hero.  And I am not being sarcastic.  My goal is to pay cash for our next home.

Astute Observation by CapitalismWorks
2009-01-22 02:50 PM

Yeah, that’s my goal too, unfortunately that would necessitate a move to Yuma!

Astute Observation by darms
2009-01-22 03:06 PM

Yah, me too. Received a good-sized inheritance back in the early 90’s & after failing to find a reasonable safe investment I used $100K, about half, to buy my current house. Given a 30yr fixed note back then would have cost me around $1K/month, after the property taxes ($2K - $4K/year) my $100K investment in effect has returned between 8% & 10% annually since that time & will continue to so do even in these bleak times. (As property taxes have risen in my area over the decades, it’s probable that I would have been required to send larger amounts of money to my escrow account over this time as well making my annual return closer to that 10% number) The money I do not have to send to some mortgage company is money we get to keep (hence return on investment) and for that matter, given that my standard deduction is more than my mortgage interest + property tax, this “interest” money is in effect tax free to boot. Not to mention the “peace of mind” thing as I seem to have joined the ranks of the long-term unemployed. If you like where you live and aren’t subject to massive HOA fee hikes (caused by REO units), by all means pay off your home if you can, especially if you purchased it at a pre-bubble price. (Bubble prices in my neighborhood were as much as $350K for a house like mine w/one more bedroom & a pergraniteel kitchen)). I am grateful to be fortunate. (& thanks again, grandmother, but I do wish you were still here…)

Astute Observation by brea
2009-01-22 08:16 PM

idrnkurmlkshk,

I might make a different decision if I had a 3brm condo that I could raise a family in and could live in indefinitely than if I was living in a 2brm condo.

Since a 2brm could truly be too small for a family with girl and boy children, I may want to save on the side for my next downpayment instead of having all my money tied up.  My fear would be that I may need to rent the small condo rather than sell and borrowing against it may not be possible.

Basicly, if I knew I would be moving, rather than wishing for a move up opportunity, I would plan to have the most flexablity and options.

Astute Observation by Soapboxpolitico
2009-01-23 03:16 AM

idrnkurmlkshk - I don’t mean to muddy the waters for you but one other thing to consider is what to do with your “extra cash” as it were. I agree with those who say sit tight, maybe add an extra payment to principle each month to accelerate your pay-off.  It is always better to own something outright, regardless of it’s future value than to be making payments on something ... regardless of it’s future value.

HOWEVER, if you can find some stable and lucrative municipal bonds to invest your extra wampum into, that might prove a better hedge against inflation than simply paying down your mortgage. A financial advisor friend of mine mentioned that he had seen some muni bonds, I don’t know which ones, offering 6% return. That’s pretty solid AND muni bonds are tax deductible!

One last thing, you are only about 8 years or so into your 30 year amortization schedule.  I’d dig that schedule out and see how much of your current and near future payments are going to interest and how much to principle. If more is going to principle than interest, you may consider just paying the normal monthly payment as you are incrementally improving your situation. It is also good to know where you stand in the amort schedule when considering refinancing.  The further along you are, the less sense it makes.

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 10:25 AM

..let me add that all my costs (mortgadge, HOA, taxes etc) come to $18000 /mo.  This about where rent for a place like mine goes for.

Astute Observation by MalibuRenter
2009-01-22 11:54 AM

Something is off.  I’m guessing either it’s really $1800/mo or $18000/yr.

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 01:03 PM

sorry typo…it’s $1800/mo

Astute Observation by Cubic Z
2009-01-22 10:28 AM

YAY! I am smarter than a realtard! Of course I knew this:-)

There were three questions that I answered incorrectly- but know the correct answers now.

Thanks for sharing guys!

CZ

Astute Observation by idrnkurmlkshk
2009-01-22 10:31 AM

after taking that test, I feel stupid.  # 5 killed me.  Anybody willing to share some advice for my situation…see post above

Astute Observation by socalhousingbubble
2009-01-22 10:43 AM

Nice quiz and good citations, MR.  Thanks.

SCHB

Astute Observation by MalibuRenter
2009-01-22 12:00 PM

Thanks.  Feel free to have your friends try this and see how they do.  I personally would have missed a couple of these questions before doing all of the research, and I’m a housing nerd.

I would LOVE to see some of these questions on the CA Real Estate Exam.  I also think it is a good list of things for prospective homeowners to know.

Astute Observation by MalibuRenter
2009-01-22 12:04 PM

Open questions regarding the quiz.

1. For anyone who has dealt with real estate agents lately, did they tell you answers to any of these questions?

2. If they did, were they right? 

3. Did anyone else involved tell you answers to any of these questions (e.g., mortgage broker, banker, escrow agent, title insurer)?  Were they right?

Astute Observation by QualityPicks
2009-01-22 12:54 PM

Question 5 brings up a point I like to tell my friends: “I rather buy a home with a low price and a really high interest rate, than a highly priced home with a very low interest rate”.

As we approach 0% interest rates, we get to deduct nothing from our taxes, but guess what? because low interest rates inflate home prices, you get to pay higher property taxes.

Not only that, but if interest rates go down you get to refinance. But if rates are so low, you get almost no benefit, not to mention that it is unlikely that rates go below 0% smile.

Finally, if you get a sudden influx of have cash like a bonus or an inheritance and you use it to pay down your loan, it would have a much bigger impact than if your interest rate is low and your mortgage big.

So I hate the fact that the Fed wants to force interest rates down to 4.5% or lower. I believe interest rates should be more like 8% to compensate the banks for the risk they are taking. Can’t you see they are going bankrupt left and right? Can’t you see that if the risk of default is high and the interest rate is low, the banks are in more trouble?

Astute Observation by Chris
2009-01-22 05:53 PM

Don’t worry. Unemployment will lead to more home price drop, foreclosures, and bank closures.

If only we have an ETF to track unemployment/jobless claims….it’ll skyrocket by now.

Astute Observation by brea
2009-01-22 07:34 PM

“I believe interest rates should be more like 8% to compensate the banks for the risk.”

Someone suggested to me that the government should cap credit card rates because they are too high.  I told him that since the risk of non-payment was so great, they seem right to me.  Also, I would rather see the users of credit pay more to recapitalize the banks.  Consider it a user fee. 

It burns me everytime I hear someone say that our economy runs on credit.  Who thought that was a good idea?

Astute Observation by Soapboxpolitico
2009-01-23 03:28 AM

Excellent point that I was making to anyone who would listen that last few years.  I kept saying price is STILL a major factor when buying anything, especially your house!  Instead, all these fools fell in love with “low monthly payments” and never once considered the actual COST of the damn thing.

I said exactly the same thing ... I’d rather buy a house for $300K and pay 10% interest than the same house for $600K and pay 5% interest. Why? Same reasons you list, not the least of which is property taxes and all other assessments based on the sale price. (And of course the actual monthly payment on $300K vs. $600K) The real benefit is as you stated, if interest rates go down then BINGO ... ole Jed’s a millionaire!!!  Refi and you win both ways! Low home price AND lowered rates.

How did this country get so stoopid?  :-D

Astute Observation by lynn pelletier
2009-01-22 12:56 PM

Thanks for this great test.  I failed badly but learned a lot.

Astute Observation by Cubic Z
2009-01-22 01:00 PM

Open questions regarding the quiz.

1. For anyone who has dealt with real estate agents lately, did they tell you answers to any of these questions?
>> Yes and No. My realtard that I hired before gave me all wrong data on tax deductions and other stuff. My realtor OTOH told me that I shouldn’t expect to flip this since the market isn’t going up anytime soon.

2. If they did, were they right?
>>Realtor is right.

3. Did anyone else involved tell you answers to any of these questions (e.g., mortgage broker, banker, escrow agent, title insurer)?  Were they right?
>> They didn’t initiate any of these questions. When asked, they either told me that they would get back to me with an answer since they are with a client right now, or gave me wrong answers.

My realtor was good. He did read what is written on IHB, what is written in newspapers and was very aware of the market sliding down. He gave us no such notions that Irvine is heaven, and the fury of hell can’t touch it.

CZ

Astute Observation by Jeff H
2009-01-22 01:11 PM

Thanks IR & MR,
60% correct. Along with “Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader?”, I now have one more reason to come to grips with my mediocrity.

Astute Observation by asianinvasian
2009-01-22 01:32 PM

adjusted for inflation

lol

Astute Observation by IrvineRenter
2009-01-22 05:47 PM

People believe homes appreciate and provide a return better than the rate of inflation. They don’t.

However, there are many investments that have historically proven to provide returns in excess of inflation. Malibu Renter detailed them in his analysis.

I am not sure what exactly you are trying to mock, but, as usual, it reflects on you.

Astute Observation by asianinvasian
2009-01-22 01:33 PM

adjusted for inflation, how much have oil prices gone up?

Astute Observation by asianinvasian
2009-01-22 01:34 PM

adjusted for inflation, how much has the price of a hamburger at mcdonalds increased?

Astute Observation by asianinvasian
2009-01-22 01:35 PM

adjusted for inflation, how much has the consumer price index increased?

Astute Observation by New Renter
2009-01-22 01:47 PM

Thanks MR and IR for another insightful post.  My husband and I have been following your blog for sometime now.  We also followed your advice and sold our Turtle Ridge townhome (for a relatively small loss) last year.  We now live in a nicer house for less per month, and our saving up to get into Harbor View when prices fall more.  I am proud to say that we sold our TH as for sale by owner and got one of the highest prices in the area at that time (prices have since fallen over 10%).  We had realtors calling us all the time and they still check in from time to time and they still tell us the same thing… “this is a great time to buy.”  My husband is too nice to reply that’s what you told us last year.  Anyway, thanks for the education that we received over the past few years.  I just wish you had been around in 2005 before we bought.

Astute Observation by Soylent Green Is People
2009-01-22 03:17 PM

Greatest. Quiz. EVAR!

Needs to be a stand alone web based quiz. Sent it to CR/Mish, etc.

Astute Observation by tonyE
2009-01-22 03:43 PM

As Bender noted: “Soylent Green, my kind of people…”  wink

Anyhow, I’m not too surprised the families with kids are the most likely to get gigged.  Kids are very expensive, and unless you hit the jackpot and they all get a ROTC scholarship they cost even more of a bundle to get rid of ( priced UC lately? ).

Not surprised the TRidge is finally hitting the skids.  I wonder what Mr. TRidge, aka Hannu Reddy, is doing with his mansion on the ridge…

Astute Observation by brea
2009-01-22 07:55 PM

“Kids are very expensive, and unless you hit the jackpot and they all get a ROTC scholarship they cost even more of a bundle to get rid of ( priced UC lately? ).”

Back in the 70’s, I went to Saddleback. Cost was $5 health fee and books of less than $100 per semester.  Then I transferred to Fullerton for $100 fee and books still at less than $100 per semester.  Sometime later someone got the bright idea that students should shoulder some of the cost of their education through loans.  Now it looks like what happened with housing, if you add more credit, it allows them to charge more.

For the amount we pay in taxes, IMO, there should be a opportunity for a free or almost free higher education.

Astute Observation by Matt
2009-01-22 04:07 PM

The assumption in #5 of “no other deductions” is pretty unrealistic, though. Now, it’s not TOO far off for a person with good health insurance, paid for by their employer. But, those health care costs are generally a pretty penny.

That said, the main thrust behind the question, that the MID really doesn’t matter for a lot of people, is a valid one.

Astute Observation by bltserv
2009-01-22 04:48 PM

Even a RE Moron like me got 60%.

My favorite was the questions about the
results of making “false claims”.

Astute Observation by Chris
2009-01-22 05:51 PM

I’m a moron…..60%.

Oh well…..back to work.

Astute Observation by Bitter Renter
2009-01-22 05:53 PM

I like how 2% of the quiz-takers got question #1 wrong, when both potential answers are marked as correct.  smile  I guess that’s what happens if you fail to answer the question, eh?

The explanation on #4 is misleading, as “If you have no other deductions, the first $11,400 of mortgage interest doesn’t exceed the standard deduction” doesn’t hold for all values of “you”.  That should be fixed to explicitly state that you’re talking about the scenario of a married couple, as in #5. 

As oc_analyst so astutely noted in a comment to “Tax Policy and Housing” the other day, in California if you’re single and make $90K, your state tax is going to be about $6K, so you’ve already exceeded the standard federal deduction of $5,450.  Any mortgage interest deduction will have an immediate value.

Astute Observation by T
2009-01-22 06:01 PM

I disagree with the one about kids going to school although agree with the generally bit.
Down in San Diego there are a lot of mello roos afflicted areas. In one of these areas in north county. They cut a deal where the mello roos gives the owners first dibs on the local school. I only know about this because a poster on a different board, probably Jim the realtor or piggingtons had rented in the area - the units were possibly unsold condos or planned apartments - and was carping about not being allowed to have their kids go to the school across the road, because of something to do with the mello roos funding the land the school was on. As a renter they were invited to take a hike and were mad as hell about it.

Also in or near Carmel Valley, there is some kind of scam going on where fees were collected for a school and then decided that now they don’t need the school and will sell the land off. Unclear on the details but its all connected with the new development = excuse to collect truly staggering mello roos fees. As in more that the cost of the mortgage in your example.

Astute Observation by Barren_Irvine
2009-01-23 01:20 AM

Can someone tell me how can you put two bedrooms in three floors?  I really a very hard problem grin

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main