Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
- cynthia curran on Mendocino and Saragota in Stonegate and the Irvine Development Map (Winter 2012)
- irvine_home_owner on Woodbury Open House Review: 75 Fanlight
Recent Posts
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Investors Are Busy in Irvine’s Low-End Housing Market
- Artist in Residence: Turtle Rock Glen Townhome
- Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Categories
- Community Profile
- HELOC Abuse
- House Flips
- IHB Property Listing
- Investment Property
- Library
- Mortgage Fraud
- New Homes
- News
- Price Rollback
- Property Rental
- Real Estate Analysis
- Real Estate Owned
- Schools
- Short Sale
- Special Essays
- Special Irvine Homes
- Uncategorized
- WTF
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $199,000 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $458,500 :: 3 Ultimo Dr, Irvine CA, 92620
- $398,900 :: 191 Lockford, Irvine CA, 92602
California expands its foreclosure relief effort
The California Housing Finance Agency will now allow homeowners who refinanced their properties for cash or took out home equity lines of credit to participate in three of its four programs. They had initially been excluded.
http://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/la-fi-keep-your-home-20110406,0,2942301.story?track=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+latimes/mostviewed+(L.A.+Times+-+Most+Viewed+Stories)
You have to work really hard to come up with a $2 Billion dollar fund that has -100% return.
Only the California government is capable of such a feat. It helps when you aren’t spending your own money I suppose. All of us responsible folks have a share. The debtors can thank us for making this possible. All you renters out there make sure to send the check, oh wait never mind they will take it out of your pay automatically. The bills are coming due for the debtors that stuck around and they need a nice house to live in.
Thank god this is federal money, it’s nice to know the Laura Louzaders in the non bubble fly over states are lending their hand in this great time of need.
Whoever said life was fair was either not playing the game or making the rules.
I have news- Chicago experienced a massive bubble and our laughably overbuilt condo market has totally collapsed. Cook County has about 1200 REO houses and condos on the multilist, and a “shadow” inventory of over 28,000 REO properties.
Yes, these are REOs, already bank owned. That figure does not include deeply underwater properties, properties delinquent on payments but not yet being foreclosed, properties in some stage of foreclosure, or short sales. There are many, many developer foreclosures on converted buildings in my neighborhood, and on massive 60 story 600 unit buildings in the South Loop, River North and South Streeterville. Here, too, one bank has published a list of buildings that it will not write mortgages in because these buildings, mostly new construction or new conversions, are so burdened with foreclosures and unpaid assessments that it’s inevitable that more of their paying owners still there will be driven underwater and out the door by the extra assessments to offset all the non-paying delinquent owners.
I waited for the bubble to break from 2002 to 2004, by what time it was glaringly evident that there was, as Paul Volker put it in 2004, “excessive risk” in the system, and the tower of debt and debt derivatives was utterly out of control, with something like $400 Trillion (that’s not a typo) worth of debt derivatives against $40 Trillion worth of overvalued mortgages.
The bubble and its fallout not only deprived me of a decent place at a decent price, but destabilized my job and endangered my retirement, left millions of other unemployed, and deprived our children of a decent future. It is profoundly depressing to consider what awaits young people who’ve gone deeply into debt to finance educations in demanding professions such as engineering and the hard sciences, just to confront rapidly shrinking opportunity with fewer job niches every year, stuck my elderly mother with stratospheric property taxes while reducing her interest income on her savings to nearly zero, the better to induce her to invest in a stock market that looks rigged to blow any day.
We who are not the bonus boyz of the financial cartel are paying and will keep on paying for this in thousands of ways- taxes, losses, lost opportunity, a destabilized job market, higher property taxes, and a reduced standard of living for at least another 20 years.
Another backdoor giveaway to mortgage Pimps.
Note that the change of heart is supposedly unemployment of Californians. Yet nobody is talking about creating makework for the unemployed. No no, the money is earmarked and set aside for mortgage payments. They don’t want to just hand everyone a check because then the people might spend the money on food rather than the mortgage.
As usual, unemployed renters need not apply for any “help”. Go find a homeless shelter. Throw another rat on the barbie.
Yes, it is all about that pesky unemployment. It has nothing to do with squatters not paying the mortgage or way too many foreclosures that banks can’t handle. Yes, it is all about unemployment, starving children, and AIDS in Africa when the Politicos need to launder some money to their buddies.
Get ready for another round of “disappointment” and righteous indignation in the coming months when the foreclosures continue to skyrocket despite all of the “help” with the bankers and the politicians crying right along with the masses and laughing it up on the Golf Course.
David, everyone needs to pitch in to get them current on their mortgages.
It will help out the children.
The children of the bankers.
Sad but true,
Heads they win, tails you lose.
Money controls everything.
What I found interesting during the price increases of the bubble was that even as prices and values were increasing, overall equity as a % of total household real estate assets was decreasing. This was also happening as households were aging. IMO, as you age, your equity position in your home should increase not decrease.
On an aggregate, you can increase the price of debt-fueled assets by just decreasing the equity. If we had $20 Trillion in assets and 50% in equity, we could keep the same dollar value of equity, but have $40 Trillion in assets with a shift to 25% equity.
A good way to measure Ponzi-Factor is how many households are paying > 30% (or an even higher %) towards a mortgage. There are many reasons why someone would devote that much of their income to a mortgage, but the main one is the hope for appreciation.
For a given property most MLS listings will quote a $price/sqft value.
I have often wondered if it would be possible to calculate (in an automated way) $debt/sqft and $equity/sqft.
If Ziprealty or Redfin or others could calculate,
it sure would help to evaluate a specific property.
In aggregate, such data would provide some very interesting trendline statistics.
Can anybody explain?
I pay a huge sales tax when I buy a used car, and then pay annual taxes on it. And the seller has already paid sales tax on the car when it was registered.
But a house buyer pays no sales tax; though, it’s used to pay salaries to teachers, firefighters, police who increase the value of the home.
A sales tax will discourage flippers from speculations.
In NC, you do pay a ‘sales tax’, but it is the cost of the ‘document stamp’ on the deed transfer. However, that is only 0.2% (2$ for each 1k of sale price). A larger real-estate transfer tax was proposed, and you can guess who was against it whole-heartedly (NAR & NCAR).
I would also like to see a tax on a sale of a mortgage note (or other financial instrument) as well, by the same logic. If flipping homes is bad, why is flipping stocks good?
You can’t avoid taxes when you flip stocks.
I think you have to pay 25% of your profit if you don’t keep stocks for long enough time.
Yeah, different lobbies are killing America.
* Banking lobby
* Military lobby
* Real Estate lobby
* Medical lobby
...
But no Renter Lobby.
Huh? Short-term capital gains (< 1 year) are taxed at the seller’s ordinary income tax rate.
The last thing we need in California is more taxation.
There is a huge difference in a transactions tax and a capital gains tax. (Using a bank-centric example) If you borrow $1Billion to end up making 1% on a transaction, that is $10M in cap gains, for a tax in the ballpark of $2.5M. If there was a 1% transactions tax, you would not make the transaction because that 1% gain would not have been there. Lots of banks and financial players make their money picking up nickels in front of a steamroller (nod to Lowenstein). Good business until the steamroller catches up.
These types of small profits in highly leveraged situations are destabilizing. Who pays for the eventual stabilization needed? Taxpayers. That is the justification for taxing those transactions.
How funny!
They asked people in NC to vote if they wanted new taxes. Certainly, everybody voted against taxes.
Only a dictator will be able to balance the US balance.
Gotta wonder about that. it’s raise taxes, cut spending, or just print it and let the debt inflate away. Can’t help notice gold & stock market rising lately ... perhaps in anticipation of the answer.
At some point, the economy will actually improve. At that point, interest rates will rise, and there will be real pressure on the deficit. Then taxes will go back up, and much spending will already have gone down (less unemployment to pay when UE is at 5% than when it’s at 10%). Interest rates rising will be the precipitating factor causing tax rates to go up.
That would be a massive tax bill… I guess it’s because they consider a home an essential good, like milk & bread, which is not taxed either. Not opposed to sales tax on real estate, but I think that might have to come with a revised sales tax rate. Or at least a much more controlled process of rate revision. It’s much too easy for the state govt to play around with it right now.
flippers are not the problem. government involvement is the problem.
another tax will solve nothing.
Who will cover the losses of “innocent victims of predatory lending” if there are no new taxes?