Login
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- Sylvia Walker on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Casual Observer on Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Astute As It Comes on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Darin on Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Sylvia Walker on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- Casual Observer on Investors Are Busy in Irvine's Low-End Housing Market
- irvine_home_owner on Tustin, but Irvine Schools
- cynthia curran on Mendocino and Saragota in Stonegate and the Irvine Development Map (Winter 2012)
- irvine_home_owner on Woodbury Open House Review: 75 Fanlight
Recent Posts
- Closed Sales from 5/10/2012-5/16/2012
- Open House Review: 52 Secret Garden
- Irvine Housing by the Numbers - May 2012 Update
- Paired Living with Privacy in Woodbridge
- Beige Ruth Sisters
- Closed Sales from 5/3/2012 to 5/9/2012
- Open House Review: 35 Bella Rosa
- Investors Are Busy in Irvine’s Low-End Housing Market
- Artist in Residence: Turtle Rock Glen Townhome
- Tustin, but Irvine Schools
Categories
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- Rest of archives
Browse Homes
Irvine Homes
- Airport Area Homes
- El Camino Real Homes
- Northpark Homes
- Northwood Homes
- Oak Creek Homes
- Orangetree Homes
- Portola Springs Homes
- Quaill Hill Homes
- Rancho San Joaquin Homes
- Turtle Ridge Homes
- Turtle Rock Homes
- University Park
- University Town Center Homes
- West Irvine Homes
- Westpark Homes
- Woodbridge Homes
- Woodbury Homes
Newport Beach Homes
- Newport Coast Homes
- Crystal Cove Homes
- Corona Del Mar / Spyglass
- East Bluff / Harbor View Homes
- Lower Newport Bay / Balboa Island
- Balboa Peninsula Homes
- West Bay / Santa Ana Heights
- West Newport / Lido Homes
Other Cities
- Aliso Viejo Homes
- Anaheim Hills Homes
- Brea Homes
- Costa Mesa Homes
- Coto de Caza Homes
- Dana Point Homes
- Huntington Beach Homes
- Ladera Ranch Homes
- Laguna Beach Homes
- Laguna Hills Homes
- Laguna Niguel Homes
- Lake Forest Homes
- Mission Viejo Homes
- Orange Homes
- Rancho Santa Margarita Homes
- San Clemente Homes
- San Juan Capistrano Homes
- Santa Ana Homes
- Tustin Homes
- Villa Park Homes
- Yorba Linda Homes
Contact
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Foreclosures
Housing
- Talk Irvine
- IHB Forum Archive
- OC Housing News
- Coto Housing Blog
- Housing Kaboom
- Patrick.net
- Housing Chronicles
- Housing Doom
- Dr. Housing Bubble
- Manhattan Beach Confidential
- Burbed
- SoCal RE Bubble Crash
- Professor Piggington
- Real C'ville
- Westside Bubble
- Bubble Meter
- Portland Housing Blog
- Sacramento Land(ing)
- OC Register Blog
Econ/Finance/Other
- Calculated Risk
- The Big Picture
- Economist's View
- Mish's Blog
- Matrix
- Bakers' Stock
- ML-Implode
- Eschaton
- Best Mortgage Rates
- Crackerjack Finance
Latest REOs
- $349,900 :: 10 Greenleaf 16, Irvine CA, 92604
- $439,900 :: 61 Olivehurst, Irvine CA, 92602
- $889,900 :: 14 Upland, Irvine CA, 92602
- $429,900 :: 56 Great Lawn, Irvine CA, 92620
- $465,000 :: 212 Garden Gate Ln, Irvine CA, 92620
- $329,000 :: 1006 Terra Bella, Irvine CA, 92602
- $199,000 :: 3125 Watermarke Pl, Irvine CA, 92612
- $579,900 :: 8 Star Thistle, Irvine CA, 92604
- $458,500 :: 3 Ultimo Dr, Irvine CA, 92620
- $398,900 :: 191 Lockford, Irvine CA, 92602
One gets punch drunk after reading IHB for awhile. The daily listing of abuse is relentless.
The place does look like a bit of a dump—SFR on a 3500 sq ft lot (I don’t mean to knock anyone who would pay a fair price for it—but this guy extracted half a million dollars). Does that really even qualify as a ‘SFR’—isn’t it a ‘condo’?
Anyway, Redfin indicates a sale on July 23, 2009 for $422,100. Was that the bank taking it over? The ad makes it look like it is still owned by the HELOC abuser.
No, the bank does own the property now. They bought it back in 2007 when they loaned this guy $520,000 on this POS. The bank didn’t realize they bought it then, but they did. They picked it up at auction a couple of months ago, so now it is officially their problem.
They picked it up? More like they got a POS dumped onto them after the auction
The bank owns this and they think it’s worth $350/sqft?
Realistic prices in realistic cities are hitting the $85-$90/sqft price range. Is there anything that really makes this area four times more expensive?
People are willing to pay four times as much. That’s why.
$350 per square foot is still realistic (i.e. people will pay it for some reason) in the best neighborhoods in Irvine. A realistic price for this home would be $250 per square foot, or about $300K. (I expect prices to fall substantially more, but they haven’t yet.)
The location is not as bad as IrvineRenter makes it out to be. Sure, it’s not secluded and it’s close to a major intersection, but it’s also pretty centrally located, and close to everything. Some people like short commutes.
There’s a Kenneth Harney article in the LA Times on strategic default (of which this is definitely not an example, strategy home-ATMing maybe). What are your thoughts on whether these people will be pursued? If they’re already trying to identify those who might strategically default, then presumably they can try to ID those with other assets or a good enough income stream to attempt to tap, or force bankruptcy.
The story clearly identifies the bulk of strategic defaulters as being in a serious negative equity position on realistic valuations. As such they are much closer to renters and their “landlord” is simply charing them too much for the property and market. I don’t think you’ll see many of these folks pursued at all. If they have big seconds or HELOCs, maybe, but if it just a first they will likely be left alone, excluding the credit score hit. And the credit score hit is going to look pretty excuseable in a couple of years for loans that have otherwise solid underwriting.
That actually looks like a nice little house, at least from the outside. It’s not dominated by a garage. That makes a house look ugly, to me anyway.
I’m not saying that I’d want to buy it. The location, as IR points out, is terrible. And I’m not looking to buy a house anyway. I already own one in a different state. But the house does have “curb appeal.”
Part of the problem with this house is that there is not road in front of it. You can’t see the house from the curb. It has 100’-down-the-sidewalk appeal.
This is one of the Cottage homes in a different phase than the one profiled weeks ago. It could look a lot better if they had fixed up the outside with some of the HELOC money. This model is long and narrow. I drive through that intersection at Culver and Main every day. The traffic is especially heavy in the morning of school days.
you definition of curb appeal is certainly different from my definition of curb appeal.
I’ll take a McMansion over that owl house with windows any day of the wk.
I think it has the potential to be very cute. However as it stands now, it has surpassed ugly - it is fugly.
Of course, that’s because there is no garage. No air conditioning either.
And why do people keep saying you need a/c in Irvine - with that wonderful ocean breeze and equable climate??
I that a facetious question?
Partly
There do seem to be some who think a/c isn’t needed. Having lived in San Clemente for a couple of decades, I found that a/c was needed about 4-6 weeks a year. Lately, I think that is increasing. Since Irvine is further inland, I assume it is at least as or warmer than S.C.
Can anyone estimate the fees all these refis generated? A good portion of the equity ‘extracted’ will have stayed with the bank.
I think tax value getting reset with refi appraisal would have slowed this type of abuse.
What bank refi’d this home’s 1st for 520 in April 2007? The Bear hedge funds had already imploded by then and the writing was becoming visible to all.
With the recession & bailouts, taxpayers are reaping what the lenders sowed. Many are out of business, but their trail of damage is long and wide, and touches many who did not participate.
The tax value did not get reset.
Per Prop 13 the tax value gets modified only when you pull working permits and add to the property or when you sell.
I understand that, and why prop 13 is there. The ‘we can’t afford the higher taxes’ excuse dies when you accept higher P&I payments. I think laws like Prop13 are ok, but can be modified to discourage refi abuse, or at least have municipalities get a little more to offset future decreases.
My point is that I’d like to see laws like that changed to have agreed-to appraisals for refi reflected for tax value purposes.
Well, if you refinance correctly:
(1) You simply refinance your existing mortage. Hence there is no ATM. No gain.
(2) The IRS allows you to cash out $100K over your purchase price, which is sort of an advance when you sell your house. Since there is no sale, I suppose you could argue for the additional tax, but since there was no value added to the house you might have some problems with an RE tax.
(3) Refinance for a remodel. In this case you add value to the house and you are subject to a tax increase to the tune of the “additional value at current market rates”, so in that case, yes, you pay more tax.
Of course, I understand your point about refinance abusers. The LA Times carried a blurb this weekend were the IRS is being asked to look into it to make sure that people who take out more than 100K over their purchase price in cash do not deduct that part of the mortgage.
The spirit of prop 13 seems to be that property appraisals for tax purposes should reflect market prices, except where those increased taxes would adversely affect a long-term homeowner. When people refi & increase the balance on the loan, they are choosing to increase their payment, and an associated increase in property taxes is fair.
As IR said, this would probably not have stopped many heloc abusers, but think. You buy for 300k, taxes 3k. You refi to 600k It would add $250/month to the payment. That’s a decent small car.
Maybe you cap it at the total loan value, so that if you want a heloc for 25k or something you dont’ get hit with the full reappraisal, but the view of a home as unimpeachable collateral was not helpful.
I didn’t know there were houses in Irvine this small. Condos, sure. Other cities, sure. But in Irvine the smallest house is normally about twice this size.
Banks = Grocers
Homes = Bananas
Have you ever been to the supermarket and seen the nearly empty banana display with a minimal amount of overripe bananas on their way to becoming rotten?
It’s not like the store is out of bananas. Rather, if they put the nice fresh ones out first, nobody would buy the spotted ones.
This POS isn’t even worthy of banana bread.
> Have you ever been to the supermarket and seen the nearly empty banana display with a minimal amount of overripe bananas on their way to becoming rotten?
Um… no. At least not in many many years. Where the heck are you shopping?
At the markets I go to, the majority of the (large pile of) bananas are green, with a handful of bunches getting close to the point of losing all their green. Definitely no brown, rotting bananas.
Reply is in spam bucket awaiting IR’s approval.
$30 billion home loan time bomb set for 2010
Thousands of Bay Area homes have a ticking time bomb embedded in their mortgage. The homes were purchased with loans known as option ARMs, short for adjustable rate mortgages.
Joey Amacker in the backyard of his Newark home, which is…ARM recast for the Bay Area metropolitan statistical area…Joey Amacker makes dinner at his Newark home, underwater ...
Next year, many option ARM payments will begin to readjust, slamming borrowers with dramatically higher monthly mortgage bills. Analysts say that could unleash the next big wave of foreclosures - and home-loan data show that the risky loans were heavily used in the Bay Area.
From 2004 to 2008, “one in five people who took out a mortgage loan (for both purchases and refinancing) in the San Francisco metropolitan region (San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin and San Mateo counties) got an option ARM,” said Bob Visini, senior director of marketing in San Francisco at First American CoreLogic, a mortgage research firm. “That’s more than twice the national average.
“People think option ARMs (will be) a national crisis,” he said. “That’s not really true. It’s just in higher-cost areas like California where you see their prevalence.”
Of the 10 metro areas nationwide with the most option ARMs, three are in the Bay Area, according to Fitch Ratings, a New York research firm. They are the East Bay counties of Alameda and Contra Costa, the South Bay area of Santa Clara and San Benito counties, and the counties of San Francisco, Marin and San Mateo.
Together, these areas account for the second-most option ARMs in the country, although they are still far behind the greater Los Angeles area (including Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino and Orange counties), according to Fitch data.
First American shows more than 54,000 option ARMs issued here with a value of about $30.9 billion. Fitch shows more than 47,000 option ARMs here with a value of about $28 billion. Both say their data underestimate the totals.
Nothing new here for readers of this blog and Mish, just makes it more “readable” for popular consumption.
IR…wish there was an IDENTICAL blog like this for the bay area, but irvine is a “special” place and can’t imagine you writing for any other city/locale. keep up the good work!
As for this home…I’d rather take this little home than the Ave1 condos directly facing jamboree. Culver, while essentially being a freeway, is decidedly less so. Since Main terminates at the loop right there, there’s less through traffic than Alton, Barranca, or Irvine Ctr. Drive. Still a mess though, but you can do worse….granted, I think the properties on Culver and Alton/Barranca/IVC are all apartments.
In the CalculatedRisk comments on this article, a mortgage-professional type in Florida mentioned that she had arranged plenty of neg-am loans with a 10-year fixed-payment period.
I have trouble believing that there are more than a few of these sleeping land mines, but if there are, here’s hoping that the holders capitulate early.
10 years: Were banks really that stupid?
Honestly, what’s 30 Billion when our Gov threw like 1.5 trillion into Wall Street and the banks last year.
Perhaps the way out of this mess will be to give money to every taxpayer this year. And to stop helping the banks.
Helping the banks helps the investors, many of them foreigners.
Helping the taxpayers puts the money into the banks as deposits (helping the balance) and into spending.
I think that works out to $1.487 trillion divided by 156.3 million equals $9,513.76 per U.S. taxpayer.
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/news/0901/gallery.money_summit/index.html
30 Billion probably doesn’t sound like much until you consider the derivatives that were spun off by the wall street crooks.
Do the math:
1. If they give the money directly to the taxpayer/citizens, how much campaign contributions will the two parties get? I
2. If the govt gives the money to the banks and WS how much campaign contributions will the two parties get?
3. If the US banks defaults on the loans, who’s going to lend the new US banks money? The citizens must lend (no choice) to the US banks by the use of US dollars, deposit, and taxes.
We stuck with the system and their not much we can do about it except work financially within that system.
Well, that kind of thought sure helped Benedict Arnold back in 1776, huh?
If we all thought like that we’d be part of the British Commonwealth and the US-Mexico Border would be somewhere in St. Louis, not San Diego.
Actually, since I live in Irvine, I wouldn’t be part of the British Commonwealth but -hopefully- some rich white gabacho in a nice hacienda.
Tonye, Old BA was just one against many. Just think if the Brits paid off the entire contintential congress instead of going head to head, but then again the Brits were going up against fanatical Christians who beleived that God made man in his image and thus has God given rights. Look how far the USA has progressed.
I don’t agree with what’s going on, I just try to deal with it the best I can.
Actually, the federal government made a profit with its equity injections into the banking system. The $1.5 trillion stabilized the industry and will probably be returned to the taxpayer with interest. It is arguably true that the banks are still underestimating their problems and will be slammed by another wave, but I wouldn’t assume (as most people do) that the $1.5 trillion is a sunk cost.
First NOD 1/17/08. Meaning they stopped paying ~Oct 2007.
10/07->7/09 = 21 months of being in the house for free. 18 months from NOD->REO.
Thats the timeline I think is becoming more and more ‘the norm’. If you add an attempt at a shortsale in there, you can stretch that NOD->REO timeline to 24mo pretty easily.
IR, I’ve told ya before - I dont think our old NOD->REO=12mo timeline exists anymore. For those that dont try *at all*, yes. I believe most people are trying to stay in their homes, therefore extending their stay.
Yes, that is what I am seeing. It is also why the cure rates are so low. It certainly throws off my attempts to calculate shadow inventory.
IR or anyone,
can you clarify this or tell me if I’ve got it right?
When I see “notice of default” on 1/17/08, does that mean the owner has missed roughly 3 months of payments already? If so, does the “notice of rescission” mean that the loan was modified by the lender at the last second? And finally, with the final “notice of sale” on 3/6/09 the bank obviously took back the property. Is it possible that this owner has not made a payment since late 2007? I hope not cuz that would be another huge chunk of money this owner squeezed out his cottage.
da fox beat me to the punch.
I love how the walkway has two parts that don’t line up.
http://failblog.org/2009/02/27/sidewalk-fail-2/
Wish I could see the face of this homeowner.
In a way he makes us renters look like fools. This owner lived rent free for almost two years, HELOC’ed the heck out of the house. In 7 years his credit will be clean and he home prices should be low enough for him to repeat this scam again.
The state and county lose out on two years worth of taxes. Bankers made the money off of his loan and refi’s. Eventually someone has to pay for for this mess..any guesses?
The property taxes will be paid, with penalties and interest. If counties could have huge numbers of people be just late enough to get the penalties, they would be overjoyed.
This is unbelievable. This little house is a piece of garbage by Irvine standards. It looks like the ticky-tacky you see in rapidly deteriorating south Cook County Post WW2 suburbs. I’m surprised it was allowed to be built as late as 1980.
I’d give the price of the lot for this dump, because it’s a tear-down. You’d want to buy it and the one beside and kick them both down to get a decent house lot. What would be a fair price for the lot it’s sitting on, do you think?
That “house” is like “poor people’s housing” in the midwest. Rent at $500-$560 per month or $50K-$70K purchase price (depending on the neighborhood).
Here in Chicago, where the prices are steeply higher than the rest of the midwest, it would fetch perhaps $100K in some rundown south suburb. More if it were some rundown north suburb, but as a teardown.
It’ exactly the kind of housing no one wants anymore, a dated, tiny, nondescript one-story house.
Yeah, but do Midwestern “Poor People’s Housing” have cable TV, fast Internet and an HOA?
Tonye,
Yes to all your questions. I had an cable with a little under a T3 speed (not too many heavy users) and HOA of $50 per year (included a common lake and beach), but house 3 times the size and 4 times the price.
Poor people’s housing don’t have the HOA fee nor common lake, but will have cable TV and high speed internet.
One plus of this house is only on one floor, but the location street noise will be unchangable unless you can get the city remove the traffic light, add speed bumps, then reroute the traffic. Won’t happen without a lot of juice and if they had that much juice to spare, they wouldn’t live in that house.
Ah, please don’t be so harsh on this little house. It’s only one picture. I live nearby and it’s on a really nice street in Woodbridge near all 3 schools (elem, middle, HS). Many of these cottage homes have been remodeled on the outside. This little guy just needs some love. It probably looks better from the side angle.
Let’s be fair. The house is in Irvine, not Chicago, and accordingly should command a better price. Chicago is a great place, but I don’t know anyone who wants to move there for their retirment.
Did you know that Irvine is competing with Australia for foreign cash buyers?
Foreign buyers blow out the housing bubble
The causes of Australia’s ever-inflating housing bubble are many ?—?artificially low interest rates, government stimulus and a real-estate industry devoted to an ever-increasing house price to name but a few. However, a less well-publicised factor may also be at play, that is the influence of foreign buyers.
In December 2008, the federal government, whose primary goal appears to be maintaining property prices at unsustainably high levels, introduced legislation relaxing rules for foreign buyers of Australian property. The rules were especially helpful for property developers, who coincidentally happen to be large donors to the Labor party.
Previously, developers were able to offload no more than half of the new dwellings in a development to overseas buyers. This would mean that companies such as Central Equity, Becton or Mirvac would develop extensive overseas distribution networks and sales teams to offload half of their over-priced, off-the-plan apartments to gullible and foolish overseas buyers (usually based in Asia, but also in the United Kingdom and US).
Thank you for that comment about Australia. We lived in Sydney for three years (2006 - 2008) and people thought I was crazy for saying what is self evidently true to an outsider—that property prices there are unsustainable. I would ask people when they thought the ‘bubble’ would burst—they would answer, “oh, it already did, back in 2003.” Prices, you see, were flat that year and have been increasing ever since.
The part about foreign buyers is important. Australia is a relatively small country, and a few thousand rich immigrants per year from Hong Kong and Taiwan have driven the prices in upper-middle class Australia. Australians don’t get a tax deduction for home mortgage interest, so mortgage interest can’t be justified on a ‘net tax’ basis, but the ‘bigger fool’ theory prevails. Prices cannot be justified by the available earnings to pay debt - cash from rich foreigners has been keeping the market humming. The only thing I can’t figure out is why the bubble hasn’t burst yet. If they let foreign investors in (not just immigrants), the bubble may still have another couple of years to run, but when it bursts, it is going to be really ugly.
New Zealand is competing, too. Big ads in the Singapore papers entreating Singaporeans to buy new “executive” condos in Auckland.
There’s still pent-up demand for safe real estate investments worldwide, but most Singaporeans can’t afford to buy in Singapore. Hence the attraction of extra-national homes. But this is only because 1) people save a lot of money; 2) there’s no HELOC here; 3) Singapore banks yield laughable interest (CDs max out at .5% [yes, one half of one percent] for a five-year commitment).
It was meant to be a loose analogy.
I’ve noticed that many of the homes that IR profiles have pretty extreme location issues.
I also notice that in my neighborhood in L.A. (Hancock Park) that the majority of the homes that have already been foreclosed on are on Highland (The busiest street in the neighborhood).
I doubt that people with toxic loans only bought homes on arterials.
So…basically…what I was trying to say is that from what I see, the banks foreclose on the shitty properties first as if they put the nice homes on the market, the subpar ones wouldn’t find their knifecatchers as easily.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/738-S-Highland-Ave-90036/home/7091959
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/633-S-Highland-Ave-90036/home/7091798
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/267-S-Highland-Ave-90036/home/7095095
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/106-N-Highland-Ave-90036/home/7094668
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/364-N-Highland-Ave-90036/home/7101505
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/507-N-Highland-Ave-90036/home/8090731
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/525-N-Highland-Ave-90036/home/7101277
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/628-N-Highland-Ave-90036/home/7101126
Are you seeing a pattern here?
Oh, meant to say yesterday thanks for the Stolen Babies song, IR—a great local band.
Apropos of this discussion, an update on a previous article about HELOC abuse in San Clemente. I was foolish enough to bid on one of the properties you listed (239 Neblina). What a mess!!!
1.) Owners (husband and wife) got >$1M in HELOC loans by setting themselves up as a ‘company’ (she was CEO, he was Exec. VP).
2.) They declared bankruptcy in August, so NO bank would commit to any house offer until that was done.
3.) Now that BofA has our offer and the docs, they have NO incentive to close this deal - they stand to lose >$300k and have already gotten $40billion of Federal money.
Until assets like this are cleared off the books, this mess isn’t going away.
I’ve been following the prices in San Clemente having previously owned there from 1978-99 (I know - sold at exactly the wrong time
The prices for similarly sized homes are about the same as Irvine and recently there’s been a significant majority shift to homes in the $750K - $1.5M range. The only short sale and REO area where values seem semi-reasonable is Talega (but still high). I can’t imagine how far all the buyers with the required down payment and annual income would have to commute if buying at these asking prices. I wouldn’t be surprised to see at least another 35% or more drop in asking prices now that the second wave of adjustable rate mortgages involving prime borrowers is starting to occur.