Replying to:

Posted by Larrygg on 12/02/08 at 08:14 AM

Can you imagine someone actually paid over a million for this place? On second thought it does have some lovely palm trees out front though!

Posted by Kelly on 12/02/08 at 05:15 AM

One other important part of all those who jumped in when there was 100% financing - the worry that if they did not jump in right then they would be forever priced out of the market.  People were so convinced that the house values would rise in double digits ad infinitum that they really had no choice.  Why save up for a year when you will have to pay another 20%? 

For many buyers it seemed very rational to jump in when they could afford it.  Even for people who knew there was a bubble did not know how high things would rise or how far everything would fall.

Posted by granite on 12/02/08 at 06:56 AM

I knew it was a bubble when co-workers who make half my salary bought houses I couldn’t afford. I am hard pressed to think of anybody who doesn’t own a house at work. Now who is holding the bag?

Posted by Chris on 12/02/08 at 07:52 AM

And I had JUST gotten that tune out of my head.  Thanks a lot.  wink

Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch on 12/02/08 at 07:55 AM

Me, I knew it was a bubble when all of my in-laws started repeating the mantra of “there’s never been a better time to buy.”  Back in the very early Nineties, when the baseball and trading card bubble was in full swing, a guy I knew who was cashing out told me “When your grandma calls you up and tells you about the current ‘chase’ cards and how much they’re worth, it’s time to get out.”  I knew the same thing was happening in real estate when the little church at the end of my street was promising a “faith-based investment plan” that involved flipping houses.

Posted by no_vaseline on 12/02/08 at 07:59 AM

The auto business has been stealing forward customers for years.

The current situation for the big 3 isn’t just a failure of managment to get thier labor costs in check - it’s a failure of managment to eat consequences of falling sales since 2001.

There might be a bigger lesson for the housing market than we think.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 12/02/08 at 08:01 AM

At first, this price struck me as WTF.  But then I re-read the description and saw that the price includes “INSIDE LAUNDRY” and then it all made sense.

Posted by Kelja on 12/02/08 at 08:11 AM

So, the Fed is buying U.S. Treasuries. Isn’t that simply printing money out of thin air?

They are attempting to restart the housing bubble.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 12/02/08 at 08:17 AM

Yes, when the FED buys US Treasuries, they are printing money out of thin air. I think their primary concern is restating the economy by adding money to the money supply. Right now, all the bank losses are causing money to evaporate even faster than they are printing it.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 12/02/08 at 08:18 AM

“the little church at the end of my street was promising a “faith-based investment plan” that involved flipping houses.”

Real estate is a religion after all…

Posted by Walter on 12/02/08 at 09:32 AM

Wonder if this is the lender:
http://www.zerodownmortgagepro.com/

They have some cheesy graphics on the site some of our Photoshopers might have some fun with.

Posted by Priced_out_IT_guy on 12/02/08 at 09:59 AM

There’s nothing better than risky investment plans except for holy risky investment plans.

Personally, I never want to hear the word “faith” in relation to any of my investments…

I can hear the investment preachers now:

“Just have faith, faith my brothers, faith my sisters, that thy WaMu stock shall rise up, soar like a righteous spirit, and ascend to gates of heaven, to speakuth with the lord, and He shall redeem stock to a mighty $800 per share. Can I get an amen! Now who shall step forth first to and buy thy stock?”

Posted by nefron on 12/02/08 at 10:04 AM

IR, don’t you think that there is another pool of buyers waiting to get in the market…the people who really did save and waited for the bubble to break and who are now renting?  How can you assume that there are none of those buyers?  The problem is, with our population, we have a nearly limitless supply of potential buyers (most people want to buy, right?) and we cannot assume that none of them have been saving and waiting.  Maybe there are plenty of buyers out there.

Posted by Perspective on 12/02/08 at 10:12 AM

For more than a decade, the auto industry hasn’t been selling vehicles for transportation; they’ve been selling them for aspirational status.

Posted by Walter on 12/02/08 at 10:14 AM

I am one of those buyers. Been saving since 2000, I have a 6 figure job and a score in the 800s. I also work with a collection of co-workers in the same position.

Thing is, all we do is talk about how much further housing is going to fall over the next few years.

Also, for everyone I know that can buy, I know 2 that bought in the last 3 - 4 years and are screwed.

I am with IR on this one. Of course there are some buyers out there, but they are out numbered and scared to death to buy in the foreseeable future.

Posted by no_worries on 12/02/08 at 10:15 AM

LA Times ran this article today:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/12/orange-county-f.html

“Orange County: foreclosures 45% of inventory”

...which had already been covered here, but I thought this prediction was interesting:

“Thomas [Steven, broker in Aliso] is calling a market bottom for Orange County in June, 2009. Affordability is being helped by the foreclosure inventory as well as lower interest rates, he contends. Thomas said he expects ‘the doomsayers, a.k.a bloggers, will eat me alive’ for his bottom-calling.”

Houses will be affordable in 6-months, good news!

Posted by Perspective on 12/02/08 at 10:20 AM

I’m one who left the queue, and even though we had 10% saved, we took on an 80/20 mortgage because the rates were too attractive. The second mortgage is fixed for 30 at 8.5% (adjusted for tax consequences closer to 5%) and we’re paying it down early.

Posted by Alan on 12/02/08 at 10:31 AM

Maybe you meant to write: in the forecloseable future? wink

Posted by Eat it in the OC on 12/02/08 at 10:46 AM

Doom sayers, you say?  How about “people who have been right, while I (Steve Thomas) have been dead wrong for years.”  Everyone needs to ask Steve Thomas: Why some many homes below $500K are selling and then ask what happens when nearly no homes are selling above $750K?  I predict that Steve Thomas will say that December 2009 will be the bottom for OC in June of 2009.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 12/02/08 at 11:02 AM

I don’t know that I would waste the keystrokes on roasting him. He has been consistently wrong, and it is obvious to everyone he is cheerleading for his own self-serving purposes. If he had any credibility to go after, I might bother, but at this point it is like debating Gary Watts. What is the point?

Posted by SeattleGameboy on 12/02/08 at 11:24 AM

WARNING!!!

One of the linked YouTube Videos on this site is infected with Actns/Swif.T virus. If you see any pop-up for a “Antivirus 2009” program, you should decline it.

I would recommend that you remove all links to YouTube videos until this is sorted out.

Posted by beerdude on 12/02/08 at 11:35 AM

Walter - that’s so funny as I was looking for them as well.

There’s a mortgage shop on the east side of the 405 right across from the ill-fated CPW development (just north of Jamboree) that is called 10% Down Mortgage or something.

I thought maybe the Zero Down guys had to change their business model!  Maybe next month it will be 20% down!

Posted by WestparkRenter on 12/02/08 at 11:43 AM

IR, the asking price is $839K not $829K. I passed up 6 or 8 Arbusto at $860K. Good to know this house is lower than the one I passed in Oct 2004.

i knew it was a bubble when my unemployed friend bought a house for $900K.

Posted by T!m on 12/02/08 at 11:45 AM

I love the street name - Arbusto, as in:
You ar bust-o if you buy this now.

Posted by Walter on 12/02/08 at 11:46 AM

Here is a winning business model:

All Cash Mortgage!

They can just charge the fees and not worry about the nasty underwirting standards screwing everything up.

Posted by dafox on 12/02/08 at 11:48 AM

hey.. they prayed that gas prices would come down. I guess it really does work!

Posted by ET on 12/02/08 at 11:56 AM

This is a question and not snark…..

but why do people who have been foreclosed on take the refrigerator? Do they have another house they bought that doesn’t have one? Does their rental (which usually have one - right?) unit not come with one? Are they going to try and sell it? I don’t get this.

Posted by Chuck on 12/02/08 at 11:56 AM

Funny, I first read this as “absurdo”.....but I like u-r-busto better….

Posted by Genius on 12/02/08 at 12:39 PM

Yet another house that is being gang raped by the houses next to it.  This is practically a townhome.

I knew the bubble was bad when people at night clubs were trying to sell me mortgages.  “It will reset, but you’ll adjust.  You’ll find a way to make more money.”

Posted by tlc8386 on 12/02/08 at 01:09 PM

There are buyers out there but the prices are still way too high. This house is so similar to my old home in the Bay Area but mine was 3,000sq. feet with a 10k lot. And it was bought for $450k in 97’ and sold much less than this one wants.

This home is worth 700k or less—no new work, small lot, no pool—nothing for this price—No one would buy it here.

way over priced—

Posted by buster on 12/02/08 at 01:25 PM

Can you believe some wingnut actually wants $850,000 for this tract home?

Posted by tlc8386 on 12/02/08 at 01:34 PM

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/Arbusto-Irvine-CA-92606/25475617_zpid

this house on zillow

Posted by Bitter Renter on 12/02/08 at 02:53 PM

Hmm, not really possible unless the virus were exploiting unpatched Flash Player vulnerabilities, and someone had figured out a way to craft (e.g. MPEG) video files in such a way that YouTube’s transcoders would create an SWF that would conduct the exploit.  In other words, incredibly unlikely.  Sounded to me like a false positive by anti-virus software, and sure enough:

http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/actnsswift-virus-affecting-embedded-youtube-vids/

If you try to play The Fixx’s video above, it says “We’re sorry, this video is no longer available.”, so I thought maybe YouTube or the owner had taken it down as a misguided precautionary measure, but I see, IR, that it’s just that Universal Music Group doesn’t allow embedding of that video.

Posted by southbay lurker on 12/02/08 at 02:56 PM

Many rentals, including mine, do not include a refrigerator.  One less appliance the landlord has to worry about maintaining, I guess.  I doubt they could get much trying to sell it.  You can get one for free sometimes on Craigslist.

Posted by Bitter Renter on 12/02/08 at 03:04 PM

Yeah, I think it’s now standard for the IAC complexes to include a refrigerator, but my IAC complex did not before it was renovated a few years ago (and there are still a lot of complexes with no refrigerator in lower-rent areas).  Had to sell my fairly new fridge when the renovations were done, and managed to get $300 for it on craigslist.

Posted by Jim Jones on 12/02/08 at 03:34 PM

Maybe I’m just old school but my thought has always been that when you buy a home you do so with financing that results in you owning progressively more of your home over the course of the loan.

It seems like the bubble brought in a huge number of buyers that were very different from traditional home buyers. Old School meant you bought a home who’s payments didn’t exceed 3x income with 20% down and a 30 year fixed. Very simple and straight forward with no surprises awaiting you at some point in the future. Then the bubble buyers came along and purchased homes with exotic zero down loans with payments that they could barely “afford” prior to the eventual Arm reset\teaser rate expiration. To use the bubble years as a point of reference for where prices should be today seems silly at best. It was an abberation that was not sustainable.

Of course there will always be people who will purchase beyond their means. But I’m wondering if after the craziness of the bubble years that a majority of buyers will refuse to buy until prices allow 3x income purchases. I’m trying to understand how people can prepare for the future when your mortgate payments prevent you from saving and contributing to retirement accounts.

Posted by caliguy2699 on 12/02/08 at 03:48 PM

IR nailed it. I found it funny how Thomas’ old blog posts - some talking about a rebound in 2007 - suddenly began to “disappear.”

Posted by DeathToSinan on 12/02/08 at 05:42 PM

I knew it was a bubble when stupid people—with abundant confidence but no education or knowledge—kept trying to sell me mortgages.  When the salesperson needs to sell their product more than a buyer needs to have it, then it’s a sure sign of a bubble.

Posted by lunatic fringe on 12/02/08 at 06:04 PM

Having been in the tract residential construction business, I know exactly how much houses like these cost to build and I will never get over the fact that someone paid over 7 figures for a crummy tract home with shitty rotary cut plywood recessed panel cabinets. Now I don’t know what the land and site development costs were but I could build these places all day long for under $65 a square foot or roughly $160k to build this house.

Posted by Matt on 12/02/08 at 07:06 PM

Given historical home ownership rates, I tend to buy IR’s argument. Home ownership is now something like 3% higher than it is normally (63% in 2008 in the West, compared to 59-60% in the 1980s and 1990s, and around 60-61% before then). It peaked at 64.9% in 2005Q1.

There ARE plenty of buyers out there. But, in the grand scheme of things, there are fewer of them relative to homes to be sold than there used to be.

Posted by Matt on 12/02/08 at 07:11 PM

Actually, here in North County, I didn’t find a single apartment or home for rent with a fridge when I last looked 2 years ago.

And, sometimes, people get desperate and they don’t want to “give up” on something. My guess is that a lot of the folks who engaged in HELOC abuse bought actual items to fill their large houses with, and they are now renting storage units to store it all in. If you’re storing a bunch of stuff, what’s one more fridge in there?

Posted by darms on 12/02/08 at 07:18 PM

‘Arbusto’ hmmmm, wasn’t that the name of GW’s first oil company, the one that couldn’t find oil in Bahrain?

IR - your “Reply to this astute observation” link seems to be hosed

Posted by Robert on 12/02/08 at 08:08 PM

I knew it was a bubble when 2 years ago at the teaching hospital I work at Med Students would say it really does not matter how much your student loans are. Just buy a house zero down and in 2 years sell it using the proceeds to pay off entire loans.

That and last year when my Brother-in-law asked me
to borrow 70k, co-sign on a 15% down adjustable loan because the Mortgage Broker assured him he could pay me back in 2 years using a cash out refi when prices return. Said sorry to the Brother in Law.  Next week he signs a lease smile

Robert

Posted by zoiks on 12/02/08 at 09:52 PM

Maybe Thomas uses the same ISP as the GOP?

There are some mighty useful computer service companies out there, if you ask me.

Posted by Bitter Renter on 12/02/08 at 09:59 PM

Yup.  My understanding is that 4x income had been standard in California prior to the bubble, however.  Would be great to go to 3x like most of the country, but not holding my breath.

Posted by Bitter Renter on 12/02/08 at 10:01 PM

I’ve always wondered what tract houses actually cost to build—thanks for that.

Posted by peter pan on 12/02/08 at 10:27 PM

Well .. we bought a house couple years back (not in Cali.) for 350 (larger lot, larger size and much nicer and better construction). Your comment on $65 per-sqft makes me feel a bit better about my purchase.

At the same time, when we bought we accepted the fact that housing market would eventually turn and we would loose part of our down payment (if we had to sell).

Posted by Soapboxpolitico on 12/02/08 at 11:20 PM

Let’s not forget one very important OTHER aspect to zero down financing ... no money in the deal and a seemingly infinite pool of cash removed price from the discussion.  No one gave a damn the actual price of something because it was all silly money to them so why care what the actual cost of something was?

Do you suppose price will be ignored in the future?  Nope. Folks are about to care a great deal about what something costs and that’s not just the acquisition price either.

Just my two point two cents.  :-D

Posted by DeathToSinanO on 12/02/08 at 11:22 PM

Arbusto was also George W Bush’s first oil company, that he started with his trust fund money and ran into the ground.  Again, a fitting name for a bankrupt endeavor…

Posted by Soapboxpolitico on 12/02/08 at 11:28 PM

Indeed. What really galls me about this strategy is that, to me, it’s akin to giving a guy who’s down 10 large at the crap’s table another 10 grand to piss down the drain.

Am I alone here or does the idea of giving “investment banks” and “financial firms” yet more and more money after their track record of late make your head explode?

I really wish someone would explain to me how giving billions in my tax dollars to the reckless, greedy bastards on Wall St. makes this all better?  I would rather our billions be used in a program similar to the WPA of the Depression era.  Uncle Sam should be spending our tax dollars on rebuilding roads, bridges and investing in mass transit projects and other large, long term infrastructure projects that not only would provide jobs but show dividends over decades to come.

Posted by Alan on 12/03/08 at 03:28 AM

Ah-ha! I thought those cabinets looked like plywood. And on Redfin it still states that the floors are (presumably were, when built) linoleum. I guess it is indeed safe to imagine that the construction quality for everything else was not any higher. $1 million, or $830k, or anything remotely close to that is such a sad joke.

This place will be bought by the homeowner equivalent of those people who charged into Walmart last Friday and trampled a guy to death. Shop ‘till you drop - it’s a fun recreation activity!

Posted by Walter on 12/03/08 at 09:49 AM

A friend of mine got this virus and it is a nasty one. They claim they never go to sites that they are not familiar with and still got it. So it appears there is an exploit out there in Flash or the browser.

Posted by doug r on 12/04/08 at 01:15 PM

I hate car ads that only state monthly payments. If they can’t state the total price straight up, they don’t want my business.

Your reply:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.