Replying to:

Posted by Soylent Green Is People on 11/19/08 at 10:49 AM

Fraud. Cannot be anything else. Why? First of all it’s not just the buyer here that is at fault. There had to be a seller willing to price the home that high, a REALTARD who agreed to take the listing, a Broker REALTARD who OK’d the transaction through their office, and Appraiser who listed the home on the appraisal as a PUD (likely) allowing higher comp PUD homes in the area to add “value”, along with a Mortgage Loan officer who managed to trick not just one but two lenders into believing this property was worth that kind of coin. Imagine the income needed to qualify for this? Using average rates of 6.0% in 2006 you can imagine the cutting and pasting it took to structure this deal.

The parties involved were crafty, not stupid.

Posted by cara on 11/19/08 at 06:19 AM

I don’t know if it’s fraud or not, but somebody “stole” the frig and stove.

Maybe the contrasting stainless steel appliances were that 3 month $140,000 difference. Oh, and a little staging.

Minus this, it’s just a rat-hole.

(I actually kind of like the layout of the kitchen with the extra cabinet area on the side and a balcony for an outdoor table. Seems practical for the area)

Posted by Lee in Irvine on 11/19/08 at 07:05 AM

These habitual wealth pretenders make me want to vomit!

Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch on 11/19/08 at 07:37 AM

I think what we should be asking is whether or not the bank, or at least the underwriter who oversaw this loan, was in on it, too.  I’m sorry, but $.8 million for a condo?  $150k I might be able to understand, it being in Irvine and all, but either someone was collecting a percentage of the sale price to get it to go through, or someone at the bank really needs to stop freebasing Preparation H.

Posted by Cosmo Kramer on 11/19/08 at 07:40 AM

Even Adolph H. drank the kool aid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNmcf4Y3lGM tongue wink

Posted by Forbear on 11/19/08 at 08:40 AM

The one thing I’ve always disliked about Irvine is the large number of “pretentious posers”, a.k.a. “pp heads”.

Posted by LC on 11/19/08 at 09:40 AM

Forget the past. Half a million for a 1500 sq ft condo in Irvine? Bwahahahaha.

I think those condos have a vomitorium near the baths.

Posted by lunatic fringe on 11/19/08 at 09:45 AM

If this was indeed a case of mortgage fraud, how many levels does it go? Does it stop at just a simple straw buyer situation or did the lender also make a bad loan knowing they would sell off the loan to investors? And did the investors buy the loan knowing they’d be made whole by the US taxpayer in the event of a default?

Hard to say but I do know as a taxpayer it really chaps my butt that I will be paying for messes such as this.

Posted by buster on 11/19/08 at 09:46 AM

About three miles down Sand Canyon there are some older condos in the low $200,000 at 1,050 sf.  That would put it at just above $200/sf.

And these clowns what HOW MUCH?  Half a million.  Yeah, let me cash out my 401(k) for the $100,000 down payment—oops, no money left there either.

The sellers at some point need to realize that the property needs to be priced so an entry-level buyer, with 20% down, can afford it with a little struggle.  At half a million, these people are dreaming.

Posted by Jwinston2 on 11/19/08 at 09:49 AM

I have seen many places in the Quail Hill area. My question to everyone that has been there as well is do you really believe this place is even worth the 500k?

I ask this because most of these condos in this area are three stories and have wide stairs, drastically reducing the actual usable square footage. Plus they are in very close proximity to many neighbors, due to the three stories, effectively making the feeling more Irvine Company apartment living than anything else. Lastly this area has a pretty decent association fee plus Mello-Roos. I just do not understand how anyone seeing these places could justify 500K, does anyone else agree?

Posted by tazman on 11/19/08 at 09:54 AM

Hey, can did the realtard even look at this place before listing?  The listing states it is a 1 story condo, yet stairs are clearly visible.  Talk about fraud!

Also, why do realtards put up 15 photos of amenities, etc. and not one of the bathrooms, bedrooms and closets?

Posted by nefron on 11/19/08 at 10:00 AM

Agree, 100%.  Funny how the collective public has already forgotten about that $700 billion gift to the financial services industry.  There they were, just teetering on the brink of the apocalypse one day, nary a peep out of them a month later. 

I feel like Paulsen did his buddies on Wall Street a huge favor, herded up our congressional ‘leaders’ like a bunch of cows for the slaughter to get them their money, and now we can’t even get out of them how they’re spending our money.  But, try to get a loan, at roughly 1/30 the value of the bailout for the bankers (who don’t produce a thing that we can sell for hard cash), for our auto industry, on which 2 million jobs depend, and our ‘leaders’ can’t figure out whether that’s a necessity or not.  There’s all of this talk about cleaning up the audo industry, let them go bankrupt, blah blah blah, and I haven’t heard word one about all of the fraud perpetrated by the financial industries.  What is wrong with this country?

Posted by dooker7 on 11/19/08 at 10:09 AM

FDIC opening office in Irvine
http://www.dailynews.com/ci_11022149?source=rss

Posted by Dano on 11/19/08 at 10:10 AM

What exactly is “custom” about the paint in this place? Does “custom paint” mean there is at least one color other than white?

Dano

Posted by ockurt on 11/19/08 at 10:12 AM

Try going to Newport.  It’s even worse.

Posted by ockurt on 11/19/08 at 10:16 AM

I agree.  Quail Hill has some nice things going for it but for the most part it’s cramped, over-priced, and far from the IBC.

They won’t get $500k for this place.

Posted by Forbear on 11/19/08 at 10:56 AM

True, although there’s more real money in Newport.

Posted by ockurt on 11/19/08 at 11:17 AM

Regarding that Westpark property that was profiled yesterday…

My r/e agent said the bank received a 50% down offer over asking.

The kool-aid is still flowing.

Posted by Forbear on 11/19/08 at 11:47 AM

Sounds like the agent is full of $hit!!!!!  Why would anyone offer more for a property in a declining market if they were putting 50% down?

Posted by . on 11/19/08 at 11:49 AM

I don’t like the codos in Quail Hill, but this one seems a little nicer than some of the other cramped ones in the area.  I remember climbing the stairs at one open house there and it sounded like it was a 40-year-old own because the floors creaked so loud.  It seemed to be very poorly constructed.

Posted by Jim Jones on 11/19/08 at 12:06 PM

Agree.

I’ve been through this area and the impression I get is that these are just nice apartments. Ignoring all the traditional value calulations (price per square foot, ect) I personally wouldn’t feel comfortable paying more that 300k for something like this. Of course units like these may never drop to this level. If I am going to make a huge financial committment for a home purchase its going to be for an SFR and not an apt. I was amazed by the huge financial burdens people were willing to assume in order to purchase apartments.

Posted by Quail Hill Renter on 11/19/08 at 12:56 PM

I’ve rented in Quail Ridge for half a year now and gone to some open houses around here. The place is cramped like Woodbury but with a markup for being in Quail Hill even though the house looks exactly the same as Woodbury. The area is nice if you like jogging up steep hills and trails, but who has time to do that. Ha!

Posted by Major Schadenfreude on 11/19/08 at 01:59 PM

I wish I had a lot of spare time and brass balls.  If I did, I would start a web site called THE PILLORY where I would copy and paste IR’s posts AND reveal the names of all the players.

“Upset about your 401k dissolving and the 700B going to banks?  Step right up to The Pillory and see part of the reason why we are where we are today!”

Posted by ockurt on 11/19/08 at 02:56 PM

Who knows…I can’t believe it either.

I said let’s wait and see what happens.  Sometimes it’s just puffery, sometimes the deals just fall through.

Posted by SnowKat on 11/19/08 at 03:55 PM

“I don’t know if it’s fraud or not, but somebody “stole” the frig and stove.”

I know of someone who had a nasty divorce who’s in which her husband came back after she moved out of the house and stole ALL of the fixtures and appliances.  CLASSY!

...no, I’m not kidding LOL

Posted by SnowKat on 11/19/08 at 03:58 PM

vomitorium

LOL

Posted by Chipper on 11/19/08 at 04:17 PM

FRAUD!

Your suspicions are correct IR that this is total fraud.

This is all from public records and can be easily verified.

Buyer No. 2 is Marco Hamza Tredicini (a.k.a. Said Hamza Yasser).  He declared bankruptcy in Santa Ana courts on 10/16/2002.  Yet on 3/23/2006, he buys this house for $660,000, all on credit.
He was involved in an outfit called Dana Capital that apparently shut down in 2007 under the force of multiple lawsuits, consumer complaints, and government action. (just google Dana Capital)

4 months later he “sold” the house to buyer no. 3.

Buyer No. 3 is Farah Alihassan—who then changed her name to Farah Hamza.  Does “Hamza” ring a bell?  Perhaps he (buyer no. 2) sold it to his wife-to-be (buyer no. 3) knowing full well that she’ll then declare bankruptcy.  (she indeed declared bankruptcy in 04/15/2008)

Looks like buyer no. 2 used his girlfriend/wife-to-be as his straw buyer to rip off the bank/taxpayers of a quick $160,000 in 4 months.

Posted by Eat it in the OC on 11/19/08 at 04:25 PM

umm..if you can find this out…then why aren’t these to scum in jail?

Posted by Chipper on 11/19/08 at 04:40 PM

No kidding.

I just searched public records (property + bankruptcy) and a little google-ing.

People spend more time in jail for shoplifting at the dollar store.

Posted by ockurt on 11/19/08 at 04:42 PM

I think there was an article in the OC Register a few weeks back about these folks.

If it’s the same people I’m thinking of, they also did the same thing with a bunch of properties in Santa Ana.

Posted by Mixy on 11/19/08 at 05:00 PM

That was different family, but the same M.O.

Isn’t it worth it for the integrity of the mortgage industry to go after some of the more obvious fraud cases, like this one?  Why would anyone invest in the shares of a lender when they don’t protect shareholders’ money?

Posted by @TheEndoftheDay on 11/19/08 at 05:57 PM

That is, indeed, some real Kool-Aid!

Posted by @TheEndoftheDay on 11/19/08 at 05:58 PM

That didn’t quite work…. here it is:

Posted by IR2 on 11/19/08 at 09:19 PM

Bcuz the banks will just get paid back by the US taxpayers. Why waste time in court when you can just hold out your hand and get welfare.

Posted by The quick and the stupid on 11/19/08 at 09:34 PM

In the coming generations, Irvine will be known as the mortgage fraud capital of the world.

Posted by zubs on 11/20/08 at 12:15 PM

Can someone alert the FBI? write their congress men?  round up the posse?  How do we know if the perps are getting their due?

Posted by lowrydr310 on 11/20/08 at 01:18 PM

Aside from the fraud going on with all the homes being sold in Irvine, think of all the mortgage companies that are (or were) based in Irvine that share some of the blame for causing this mess.

Posted by tlc8386 on 11/23/08 at 08:50 PM

The mortgage broker was paid in commission based %—so the higher the price of the property—-the higher amount of money he made—-

Posted by tlc8386 on 11/23/08 at 08:58 PM

Everyone was in on this fraud scheme—
Raise the price of all the homes everyone collects-
city gets higher taxes
hoa gets more money
surrounding homes go up in value—higher prices
future higher selling prices
mortgage brokers collected high commissions

bankers sold off the loans 30 times their value

and we tax payers who rent will pay for years to come—

And best part no reduction in melloroos , city or state taxes but Arnold wants to raise—-lol

Irvine is the biggest scam of them all—

Posted by toy screening on 12/11/08 at 03:35 AM

I don’t know if it’s fraud or not, but somebody stole the frig and stove.But I actually kind of like the layout of the kitchen with the extra cabinet area on the side and a balcony for an outdoor table.
toy screening

Your reply:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.