Replying to:

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 04:40 AM

OK, do we have a medical bills person today?  A post like this would not be complete without someone interjecting the possibility that maybe these people had medical bills to pay.  Anyone?

WhereDidAllTheHELOCGo.jpg

Posted by G in INdiana on 10/09/08 at 03:40 AM

The same thing almost happened to my parents, but it was due to medical bills not spending sprees or drug addiction. From the kitchen and the out dated window treatments, you know damned well they didn’t upgrade the property. It doesn’t look like a crack den either, given how clean the place looks on the inside and out.

Posted by CapitalismWorks on 10/09/08 at 04:18 AM

Judging by the pics, I’d say they did themselves a favor getting kicked outta this dump.

Posted by r€nato on 10/09/08 at 04:45 AM

I know you were just trying to make a cute remark, but I’m not laughing.

I’m sure they’d much rather be in this ‘dump’ than wherever they are renting now.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 10/09/08 at 05:13 AM

They had a chronic case of kool aid addiction that did not surface until the real estate bubble hit. It required $100,000 a year to treat the symptoms.

Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch on 10/09/08 at 05:15 AM

Sigh.  I’m not going to jump on the “medical bills” bandwagon.  I’m just going to note that this sounds suspiciously like a couple that recently retired, say within the last couple of years, and didn’t save anywhere near enough for retirement.  It’s okay, though, because HELOCs are as good as cash, right?  Get ready to see a lot more of these:  out here in Dallas, you’re already seeing similar longterm residences popping up on the market, and all because the owners watched the Joneses do all of the things in retirement that they dreamed of doing.

In a related aspect, expect the whole market for reverse mortgages to implode in the next few weeks.  The last thing any bank is going to want is to take over houses when their owners die, when the sale value is a fraction of what the bank paid for it during the boom.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 05:24 AM

Indeed. 

All these people with HUGE medical bills that just coincidentally arose during the bubble rally. 

How did people with medical bills ever manage to get by before the bubble without the house their stepping up and chipping in?

Posted by Larrygg on 10/09/08 at 05:59 AM

What makes the Kool-Aid very tasty is the fact that the money is tax free. You take out a $150K HELOC and you get to spend it all. Not like a lottery win or a win at a casino where you get taxed by Uncle Sam. It’s all yours to spend as you wish. I wonder where they live now?

Posted by Bubble Popper on 10/09/08 at 06:22 AM

Home prices weren’t the only things to skyrocket during the last five years.  Medical costs and college tuition probably increased more on a percentage wise than any piece of real estate during the housing bubble time.

Posted by ipoplaya on 10/09/08 at 06:32 AM

Hey AZ, remember this place featured here around a month ago?

22 Ninos

It was a property you said would rot on the market, was way overpriced, etc:

Astute Observation by AZDavidPhx

2008-09-09 12:00 PM

No, I don’t.  Under your logic, if they priced it at 749K then it would have sold within a couple of days.  Instead it is now going to rot on the market and chase it down.

Astute Observation by ipoplaya

2008-09-09 12:03 PM

Yes it likely would have, probably for $750-760K.  Why take $750-760K off a list of $749K when you can get $780-800K instead?  They may chase the market down but I doubt it.  If they take what the market offers them, they’ll be in escrow within weeks…

WELL, IT JUST CLOSED, IN LESS THAN A MONTH, FOR $780K.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 06:46 AM

I know -

I clearly underestimated the pool of stupid buyers (and lenders) that are still out there.

I’m curious how much of a down payment the buyer put into the toilet.  Do you have any way of finding that out?

Posted by r€nato on 10/09/08 at 06:48 AM

AZDavidPhx, I like you. I really do. So, please, don’t let it be true that you are one of these cruel conservatives who assumes that if some unforeseeable misfortune befalls someone, it’s their fault because they are a fuckup and they deserve everything that happens to them.

Were plenty of people irresponsible with HELOC intoxication? Absolutely. But it’s also true that shit happens in life. People get sick and we have a health care system which is geared towards providing terrific care to those who can afford it, and everyone else gets thrown to the wolves should they make the irresponsible decision to get cancer.

Posted by HebrewHammer on 10/09/08 at 06:52 AM

.....That’s nice raspberry

Since today is Yom Kippur maybe the buyer and the lender can atone for the sin they just committed of propping up a ridiculous price on a house that will be a REO within a year.

Posted by ipoplaya on 10/09/08 at 07:03 AM

The asking price on this REO is not too much above CMV.  It should be able to sell for $650K for sure, likely $675K I’d think…

Some fool will think it’s got to be a great deal because it is an REO and pay $690K.  I think you put too much faith in the auction process IR.  Properties get missed there.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 07:06 AM

Well we all know that. 

Ipoplaya isn’t concerned with the big picture.  He just wants to have his “I told you so” little-man moment to overcome his insecurity that has been building up for the last year as the market has been tanking despite all of his bullish Pollyanna “Prices will never drop we are all rich” hubris.

He can’t argue that prices won’t crash anymore so he has re-arranged the goal posts, headed for the hills alongside his cronie IrvineRealtor, and switched to “houses are still selling” which is a lot safer for him because houses are always going to sell (by law of average).  It’s a good strategy - the broken clocks get to be right twice a day.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 07:11 AM

I never said that at all.  I think that those kinds of the people are the ones who do need to be helped.  And I will be the first one to voluntarily pay more in taxes to make sure that my neighbors have health insurance.

But at the same time you have to look around.  Whenever we get one of these posts, there is someone who comes by and plays the medical bills card.  I don’t believe that medical bills are the normal explanation for this home-equity extraction that is being documented day after day on here.

And many times when you see media stories about troubled home-owners, they always say “We took out the money to pay bills” which is code for “We took out the money to pay credit card bills”.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 10/09/08 at 07:12 AM

If they can turn a quick $100K from the auction price, you won’t see too many more that get “missed.“

Posted by ipoplaya on 10/09/08 at 08:01 AM

IPO = someone with a decent understanding of the Irvine RE market.

AZDave = a blowhard chicken little with not much understanding or experience with regard to most on which he posts.

Stick to the funny pics AZ, that’s about the extent of your usefulness here…  When houses like Ninos are still selling in the $600s a year from now, I’ll make sure to remind you then too.

Posted by ipoplaya on 10/09/08 at 08:04 AM

I’ve seen a few in recent months that have turned profits of $50-100K in less than three months holding time…  I’m tracking a couple of more in escrow that could be $50-100K flips as well.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 08:55 AM

What was the down payment on that house, Ipoplaya?

It will be a good property and case study to track.  I look forward to coming back and looking at the prices of the neighboring houses 1 year from now to estimate how much money those knife catchers blew. 

It would be nice to know how much of the loss was theirs and how much of the loss was the lender’s.  Find out the info and post it.

Posted by HebrewHammer on 10/09/08 at 09:10 AM

IPO = someone with a decent understanding of the Irvine RE market.

...lets take a look at that statement for a moment shall we

While Irvinerenter supports his statements with sound economic theory and historical data of the Orange County housing market, you just simply justify your David Lereahish assertions because some schmuck payed way too much for a house, not giving any real analytical insight beyond that.

Not to mention you’re the one who does most of the name calling around here :D

Doesn’t really add to your creditability much now does it?

Posted by Sammy on 10/09/08 at 09:10 AM

People should insure against medical problems or save enough money to insure themselves against any medical misfortune BEFORE they buy a house, a new car, a boat, college educations for their kids, big screen TVs, new landscaping, etc.

Its all about priorities.

Posted by Medical Broker on 10/09/08 at 09:36 AM

Many people choose not to get medical insurance until they get sick.  They can afford to drive Hummers, get fake boobs and buy expensive clothes, but decide they don’t need insurance…... until it is, they get cancer.  Well, guess what?  Too late!  Could you drive without car insurance, get in a huge accident, then apply for car insurance and expect the insurance to pay for your accident?  Yes, there are some people that truly cannot afford insurance (and there are government programs that deal with this) but many choose a lifestyle over medical insurance.  It is a choice. ....And many choose to have fun & drink kool aid, rather than pay for security.

Posted by asdf on 10/09/08 at 09:44 AM

Douche.  You have no idea the situation they were in.

Posted by abdul rahim on 10/09/08 at 10:03 AM

lotsa stores and eateries will go bye bye as those with heloc money vanish from the face of the earth. linens ‘n’ things is going under—not just bankrupt but out of business.

anybody predict any other chains about to take the dirt nap forever?

Posted by BubblePopper on 10/09/08 at 10:12 AM

I’m tired of people being so judgmental without having all of the information.

If you’ve never been sick or had a broken ankle or known anyone who has been the hospital, you really have no idea how much hospital bills cost these days.  I have an aunt who was recently diagnosed with cancer.  The bills are astronomical.  She’s retired from a government job, with health insurance and her husband at age 70 is still working so he can keep his health insurance.  Without the double insurance, they would be taking equity out of their home or moving in with their kids. 

I suppose they should have saved $1,000,000 extra in addition to their expected retirement so they could pay for these unforeseen circumstances.  They do not own a flat screen TV nor do they drive new expensive cars.  Both of their children went to public universities and one worked his way through school and the other had full scholarship.

Posted by ipoplaya on 10/09/08 at 10:18 AM

I said this house would sell for $780-800K and also quoted high $700s.  That’s what it sold for…  That’s enough cred for me.  Any frequent posters here, even AZ, will have admit that my take on current market RE pricing in Irvine, is as sound if not better than anyone’s, including IR.

Early this year I started posting above the slowing rate of home price declines in Irvine and prices leveling out.  I suggested back then that continued annualized declines rates of 15-20% that many here trumpeted would never occur.  People dismissed those notions then but what I postulated has come to pass.  Now we’re into October and homes are selling for what they did in March and for what they did in June.  RE prices in Irvine have fallen 3-5% at most since early this year…

The only real claim I make about future prices is that they will be higher than that AZ predicts, as he is a serial under-estimater.  I don’t claim to know the future, just what is happening today.

Posted by ipoplaya on 10/09/08 at 10:21 AM

I’ll see if my cronie IrvineRealtor will be so gracious as to dig up that info.  Eventually he will since he tracks every closed Irvine sale and the down payment amount…

http://www.irvinerealtorsite.com/IrvineDowns.xls

Posted by alan on 10/09/08 at 10:40 AM

I side with ipop here, he does know what current selling prices in Irvine are.


That said, I have no idea how these prices are being sustained and I suspect there will be crash in the not too distant (< 6 month) future.

Posted by Genius on 10/09/08 at 10:43 AM

I’m somewhat shocked it went for $343k in 1991.  Isn’t that a bit on the high side?  I could be mistaking Irvine for some other place I was researching.

There’s really no use arguing over prices and speculation guys(I know, kinda funny coming from me right?).  All will be revealed in due time.

Posted by Genius on 10/09/08 at 10:47 AM

Ack, I should read the entirety of the blog post before commenting.

“peak of the last bubble”

In 30 years will the homes built today look as ugly as this one does to me right now?  I hope not.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 10:47 AM

Not only are they expensive, the slimebag insurance companies “decline” to pay for as many things as they can weasle their way out of.

Fortunately, I have not had a health crisis yet but it’s pretty disgusting to see how others are treated.  I certainly wouldn’t want to be treated like that.

I’ll be the first to support higher taxes for universal health care “just because” it is the right thing to do.

Posted by Woodbury Renter on 10/09/08 at 10:48 AM

Ipo - you are right about the market refusing to acknowledge the obvious.  I am frustrated with the slowness of the decline in house prices.  My bet is that the Option ARM implosion (well documented and predicted by IR) over the next several years will finally be the spark that wakes people up and sends prices down towards income and cash flow equivalecy fundamentals.  In the meantime I have told my wife to hunker down and be patient as it looks like we will need to keep renting at least one more year.

Posted by Geoff on 10/09/08 at 10:55 AM

Are we just assuming that this person (or family) spent all their equity withdrawl and has been kicked to the curb?  They could have easily used one of their several HELOC withdrawls to make a decent downpayment on a new house.  Am I missing something here, or isn’t this a reasonable explanation?

Posted by Schadendude on 10/09/08 at 10:58 AM

He’s right.  For every cruel conservative, there’s a bleeding heart liberal who’s willing to excuse any behaviour.  I’d be willing to be helocs to pay medical bills are extremely rare.  Who has a mortgage but no medical insurance ?

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 11:00 AM

Ipoplaya -

I don’t have any problem with your knowledge of what a house sold for today.  My point is that that knowledge is meaningless.

I am looking at where the prices are going in the long run.  Not at where they are right now.

It is not hard to look at the income numbers alongside California’s spending deficit and conclude that something is not quite adding up.

When you come on here and boast about how some house sold for some inflated number - all it tells me is that the lenders have not learned anything and are still making the same loans that got them into trouble to begin with.

Let’s see the down payment numbers on all of these properties that you are profiling.  That will be a lot more telling.

Posted by Schadendude on 10/09/08 at 11:04 AM

ipo - pull your head out of your @ss buddy and look around…  this is the perfect economic storm.. once and a lifetime event.  the only thing that will save the RE asset class is hyperinflation..

Dow is down another 223 as I write this.

Were you ditching the day they taught situational awareness ?

Posted by BubblePopper on 10/09/08 at 11:09 AM

My point was you can still have insurance, even double insureance, and still have to pay a huge out of pocket fee.

You can also have insurance and a mortgage but have relatives who are not so unlucky.  Now I would agree it would be stupid to do so, but there are people who would pull equity out of their home in order to help siblings, children, parents or childhood friends.

I know if you live in South OC or if you watch Flip This House & Property ladder, you think that every single person who has a HELOC is busy flipping homes or buying things they do not need in order to look good, but believe it or not there are people who have had bad luck, lost a job, or had a spouse die who tapped into their home value for immediate cash.  Sure they should have had an emergency fund, but sometimes life is not so simple and clear cut.

Posted by camsavem on 10/09/08 at 11:16 AM

As Jim Morrison liked to say, “were all just a bunch of slaves”.

I think the HELOC abusers had the right idea,take the money while you can get it. Being honest and saving has brought me nothing but pain and misery. I got to watch the entire OC party likes its 1999, and now I am left holding the bag as my business slows and my investments get flushed.

I have lost over a 100K the last 18 months.

At least the HELOCer’s got to have some fun with that 100K loss, plus they dont have to pay the taxes on the forgiveness of debt.

Sweet.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 11:25 AM

Ipoplaya -

I had a look over your data sheet.  It looks like the majority of people buying in your area are definitely not first time buyers.

One loan in particular did stand out and strike me as very strange.

3 weeks ago,
26 Dewey 92620
sold for 735,000$ with 0% down.

3 days later
39 Secret Garden
Sold for $738,852 with a whopping 13,448$ 2% down payment.

Granted, these are exceptional cases, but it is still pretty obvious that the lenders are gambling on prime borrowers.

Posted by alan on 10/09/08 at 11:31 AM

91 was the height of the last bubble.  Prices declined 20% over the next few years so by the mid 90’s properties like this could have sold for $275k.

Posted by alan on 10/09/08 at 11:34 AM

“that knowledge is meaningless.“

“I am looking at where .... in the long run.“

Hey AZ…

In the long run, were all dead!

You should just admit you were wrong, I’ll forgive you.

Posted by garbler on 10/09/08 at 12:00 PM

Sadly, I agree with you. Doing things the right way never got me anywhere. Washington only cares about amoral thiefs or lazy losers.

Posted by Major Schadenfreude on 10/09/08 at 12:10 PM

“... the slimebag insurance companies “decline” to pay for as many things as they can weasle their way out of”

And if that business unit is so successful at that tactic, they treat themselves to $500 million “resort weekends” for the mid level managers - even if their parent company has to be propped up by taxpayers.

That’s some industry.

Posted by houseonlegs on 10/09/08 at 12:17 PM

Public records are showing no mortgage data on 26 Dewey, that does not mean $0 down financing.

39 Secret Garden is correct per public records, FHA loan.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 10/09/08 at 12:19 PM

If they had pulled their equity out in one lump sum, we all could speculate on uses for the money other than consumption. However, since these owners showed a pattern of incremental withdrawals, it is far more likely they simply took out the money and spent it.

Posted by Major Schadenfreude on 10/09/08 at 12:24 PM

$735,000 with ZERO DOWN???!!!

You’ve gotta be kidding me?!  I’m speechless!

(Actually, I’m not and just wrote a post with unprintable words, but erased it.  I’ll try and be cool).

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 10/09/08 at 12:31 PM

It says 0% (not ‘No Data’) on the link that Ipoplaya provided.

Very sketchy.

Posted by Dave on 10/09/08 at 12:35 PM

I agree with David.

The Berkeley Hills just peaked in 2008, or may still be going up. 

Which makes no difference whatsoever.

They will lose 65% of their current list price with a few years.

What is happening now in Irvine has very little bearing on what will be happening in next year.

If these buyers didn’t put down 20%, and cannot swing the mortgage at 3x gross on a single income in a secure job on 35% DTI, classical, historically supported underwriting standards very strongly suggest these buyers will eventually default. 

These underwriting standards were developed for a reason.

Posted by Dave on 10/09/08 at 12:38 PM

Berkeley Hills is still going up, or just peaked.  Lot of houses now coming on the market though.  A whole lot of them last sold in 2008… and marked up 10-20% from last sale.  Marked up like $200,000 since July.

Beginning of the end for the Berkeley Hills in my opinion.

Posted by ipoplaya on 10/09/08 at 12:52 PM

Here’s the situation today Schadendude:

Listed Irvine housing inventory is quite low relative to recent past and recent sales.  Months inventory for the city is perhaps 4-5 months of product on the market which typically means a fairly stable price environment.

Mortgage rates are still at or near historical lows.

Government intervention continues to enable historically lower underwriting standards, e.g. FHA doing loans for only 3% down up to 41% B/E ratio.

My “awareness” of these facts allows me to view current market dynamics more realistically.  Does yours?

Only hyperinflation of wages will save the RE class, not hyperinflation of commodities, consumer goods, food, etc.  Hyperinflation there will kill RE further.

Posted by vicstah on 10/09/08 at 12:53 PM

On a different note, since IR brought up Nickelback today… Please check out this video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbCzGt7S7M4

Its pretty sad how these guys use the same chords for their 2 biggest hits.

Posted by mmg on 10/09/08 at 02:16 PM

I have a question for the smart bunch over here, what is the effect of the last 4 weeks on home buying esp locally, what does that do to home priced while intoxicated (with koolaid   LOL ), is this winter going to be the capitulation phase?

I know I have been busy following the market but just got to thinking, what happens locally?

Posted by camsavem on 10/09/08 at 02:41 PM

Uh, then why havent you bought?

Posted by ventouxbob on 10/09/08 at 02:43 PM

- I have one that I think may Tank. it’s a subsidary of home depot.

HOME GOODS. I went in there last week on the week-end Man was it empty.

we were having a ball lauging at the 4k refrigeraters, 1.5k esspresso maker. etc etc..

they will tank.

IKea on the other hand? they may be one to grow.
cheap stuff. 350 for a fridge.

Posted by BH in HB on 10/09/08 at 02:56 PM

To MMG,
I have had a number of buyers put their purchases on hold til after the election. Their are many wealthy individuals opting to rent high-end homes because of the uncertainty of the market. The general public is probably not looking at this market as a great buying opportunity. It may be a good time to buy it may not but if you can buy based on cash flow you can’t go wrong.

Posted by mmg on 10/09/08 at 03:01 PM

thanks, here in OC if I were to buy based on cash flow, the seller would get Screw#d LOL

Also what happens to bank’s psychology, any lenders out there to share what they are seeing. will banks be lending 1 mil for McPOS in IRVINE or south OC?.

Posted by Kirk on 10/09/08 at 03:27 PM

And it’s nice to see the Fed and Treasury wage a war against fixed income investors. This is a risky time and they seem to think it’s okay to have low yields on loans. Now the Treasury is going to buy a bunch of CP, because the companies think it is their constitutional right to borrow at low rates. The private sector is buying CP when it’s priced right. This is no different from home sellers that refuse to lower their price and then end up getting foreclosed on. These low rates and government handouts are making things worse. Just nationalize the f*cking banks and let the rates soar. If the rest of corporate America keeps crying about having to actually pay to borrow money then nationalize them too. I’m sick of supporting a bunch of whining “free market” a**holes that can’t seem to accept what an actual free market is.

Posted by Barren_Irvine on 10/09/08 at 04:09 PM

No sympathy for people like this.  I wanted a home in early 2000, but could not afford it.  Now I know why, because people like this were driving the price up.  Now they can spend next 10 years in a 900 sq ft Irvine apartment.

Posted by Schadendude on 10/09/08 at 04:19 PM

“Government intervention continues to enable historically lower underwriting standards, e.g. FHA doing loans for only 3% down up to 41% B/E ratio.“

...and yet prices continue to fall…

You don’t get it, do you ?

You are now dubbed, the US economic information minister.  The entire economy is beginning to collapse around your ears and you’re still cheerleading for the asset class that lead the charge. 

Rates at historic lows ?  Guess you better pay inflated prices while you can, cause LIBOR and TED spreads are growing.  Time is running out to catch that machete. 

When unemployment spikes, RE is going to get destroyed even worse than it is now.
Count on it.

Posted by Matt on 10/09/08 at 04:26 PM

People, people, people.

Honestly, I think you’re debating a semantic point. People could be buying houses now at the prices they are posted at.
AND
Houses could not be objectively worth as much as they are paying for them and go down in the future.

Let’s face it: a cause of this bubble was very large numbers of people buying things for more than they were worth.

Where we all might have a real disagreement is one where we think the prices people will be willing/able to pay are going to go from here. But, I’m not going to lose any sleep if I say “nobody in their right mind would pay that much for that” and someone does. Nor will I lose any sleep if generally accepted market indicators don’t predict accurately; anyone who tells you they can predict everything without error is generally lying.

Posted by Schadendude on 10/09/08 at 04:26 PM

ipo - It’s a bit country, and there are lots of economic players.  What should concern you is not what you can observe individuals doing, but what you observe the herd doing.  For what the micro giveth, the macro will taketh away.

Watch the LIBOR and TED spreads grow along with unemployment rates.  RE is done, but dumb folks can always be sold by a clever salesman. 

So what exactly is your theory then, that we’re close to a bottom ? 

LOL cmon dude, seriously.

Posted by Schadendude on 10/09/08 at 04:31 PM

Flipping right now is playing russian roulette.

Posted by Matt on 10/09/08 at 04:47 PM

My thinking (ie, what someone who is possibly smart but not informed thinks):

I’m not sure. I see a few different strands, and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts.

1) As stocks plummet, people become more nervous about making any kind of investment, including a house. This could either hurt the high end more than the middle or lower (as people with money who want to buy play a more conservative card), or just hurt all markets.

2) As stocks plummet, some people might choose to invest there instead, figuring there must be some undervalued assets. Context: what took the housing market a year to drop, the Dow did in a week. Some of that might have been panic selling.

3) As stocks plummet, someone’s down payment fund might be shrinking. This one’s simple: less money available, buy less house or no house.

4) As stocks get more volatile, people leave the market and want a safe haven for their money. Some of those people might figure they’ll sink their nest egg into a house for retirement on equity instead of on dividends. Might lead to price support, in this case.

5) As the whole economy goes to hell in a handbasket, a lot of folks will be scared and fear doesn’t lead to wanting to make the most expensive investment you’ll ever make.

6) Fear over the market might lead to owners trying to sell while they can (fearful they hold a depreciating asset). Seems unlikely to me; you gotta figure these people would already be selling.

7) Rate cuts could filter into mortgages or might not. THey might not because banks are still scared houses are overvalued and don’t want to foreclose (which a recession makes more likely, even for a good borrower). So, they might not lower rates to cover those expenses (and recoup losses from the last 4 years). On the other hand, competitive pressures might lead to lower rates. I’m totally unsure on this.

Those are the 7 that come most readily to my mind. In the end, I think the net is that it hurts any housing market, but possibly hurts OC less than other markets (simply because so many people buy here with less down and care about rates more, so the underlying rate cuts might have the larger effect. However, the more I think about it, the more I realize I don’t know.

Posted by pixel on 10/09/08 at 06:09 PM

Hey even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Posted by MalibuRenter on 10/09/08 at 06:18 PM

I think an observation from people who win lotteries may also apply to many people who took out tons of home equity.

Many of them do things that aren’t quite selfish and irresponsible, but they sure go through a lot of money.  Some of the not-so-bad things lotto winners often do are: pay for a relative’s tuition; pay for a relative’s tuition; loan money to someone in need (might as well just kiss it goodbye); open that business they’ve always dreamed of (that failed, otherwise these stories don’t end with a foreclosure).

Posted by make sense on 10/09/08 at 06:32 PM

Why it is right when the market is going up, it is a crisis when it goes down, it makes no sense to me. everything develops as circle, peak comes from bottom, vise versa…..I don’t think there is a crisis but some people want to say it is crisis, crisis is crisis no matter you speak out or not. ..let the market tell and do its own job…...price is equal to value only when a couple with $150k can aford a decent house in Irvine
http://yousaymesay.blogspot.com/search/label/Tell My Son what to do

Posted by HAH on 10/09/08 at 08:13 PM

The election won’t change a thing. The government has already shown all its cards, there’s nothing left to do but sit it out the ride and wait to see what happens.

Posted by Priced_Out_IT_Guy on 10/09/08 at 08:18 PM

Bwhahaha. That would be opinion, not fact.

Posted by LC on 10/09/08 at 09:33 PM

People are going to realize that it was a sucker’s rally in Irvine. Quick.

Posted by Jake on 10/09/08 at 09:55 PM

Wow, I grew up on this street.  I remember that house, although I wasn’t living there anymore when these people bought it.

Even though I don’t know the owners, this one is definitely hitting “close to home”.

Posted by mickeyc on 10/09/08 at 11:00 PM

Hi,
Would you mind adding me to your blog roll?  I have been writing this for about a year and a half as emails to friends and I’ve decided to put it up in a blog format.
I have read your blog since early 2007 and it helped me out immensely.
Thanks,
Mike
www.slycapital.com

Posted by Mikee on 10/10/08 at 03:13 AM

I’m thinking college tuition.  They’ve been there 17 years, so they probably just got through the college tuition years.
My Dad did the same thing, but only took the minimum he needed and (we) paid it off quickly. 

USC is over 40K a year now!! If you have three kids going through college, with no scholarships and make too much money for assistance, then a HELOC makes sense.
Not saying this is the case here, but may be one explanation.  And get this, they don’t have to pay it back!!  Win-win (for them.)

Posted by Sammy on 10/10/08 at 09:38 AM

$500Million?  I believe AIG spent $400K on that weekend resort and it was for independent salesmen.  Only 10 employees of the company were invited.

Posted by ! on 10/10/08 at 11:50 AM

$40,000 per person?  That’s even worse!

Your reply:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.